Carnicom Institute Research

2000 - Part 1
 Acknowledgements

Mission Statement:

Carnicom Institute is a non-profit organization working solely for the

benefit of humanity. Our goal is to provide the public with beneficial
and responsible information through scientific,
educational,environmental, and health research for the public welfare.
The Institute has devoted significant effort to the important issues of
geoengineering and bioengineering.

Disclaimer:

The Carnicom Institute is a non-profit health and environmental

educational and research organization serving the public welfare. CI is
not a clinic and does not perform any medical diagnosis, medical
treatment, or prescription of therapy. We do not advocate any
proprietary products, protocols, or therapies. All studies conducted by
the Institute are for research purposes only. Our purpose is to provide
information and education to the public.

License:

Carnicom Institute by is licensed under a Creative CommonsAttribution-

NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
 Table of Contents
Jan 1
AN OPEN INVITATION 1
ABC NEWS 20/20 SAYS 'UNFORTUNATELY' IT WAS NOT CHOSEN 2
WORLD NET DAILY 'PASSES' FOR THE TIME BEING 5
REPRESENTATIVE UDALL FAILS TO RESPOND 6
PORT COLUMBUS AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL RESPONSE 9
ATMOSPHERIC PLASMA - KINETIC ENERGY MODEL 10
FIRST CALL FOR CONGRESSIONAL AND STATE GOVERNOR RESPONSES 14
OFFICE OF SECRETARY OF DEFENSE STATES 'NO CAUSE FOR ALARM' 15
Feb 16
SANTE FE FORMATIONS 16
COLORED CLOUDS 18
Defense Bio Testing 1977 19
THIRD GROUND SAMPLE RECEIVED 24
EPA CONTINUES TO BE 'UNAWARE' 29
Mar 31
CAROL M. BROWNER (EPA) RECEIVES GROUND SAMPLE 31
GROUND SAMPLE SENT CERTIFIED MAIL TO EPA 33
BOOM ATTRACTS MAINSTREAM MEDIA 36
MICROSCOPIC PARTICLE COUNT STUDY NEW MEXICO 1996-1999 39
MYCOPLASMA PNEUMONIAE INFORMATION 41
Apr 44
FLEET FORMATION 44
A CITIZEN'S CHRONICLE OF INQUIRIES 46
ULTRAVIOLET LIGHT INVESTIGATIONS 62
GEL FALLOUT REPORTS 65
SATELLITE IMAGE; WEST COAST, US April, 2000 69
REPRESENTATIVE MIKE THOMPSON, CA ALL IS 'NORMAL' 72
RADAR & SATELLITE IMAGES; DISPARITY BETWEEN SATELLITE AND RADAR IMAGES 74
May 76
POISONED SPRINGTIME 76
UNUSUAL TRUCK ACTIVITY 78
BIOLOGICAL COMPONENTS IDENTIFIED 81
UNUSUAL TRAIL 94
A MECHANIC'S STATEMENT 96
AN AIRLINE MANAGER'S STATEMENT 99
FBI CONTACTED 101
RADAR IMAGE 103
Jun 104
EPA DEEMED NEGLIGENT 104
SYNTHETIC CLOUDS REVEALED 107
SOUTH AFRICA FIBERS; NEWS REPORT CORROBORATES U.S. FINDINGS 112
INQUIRY : RAINWATER ANALYSIS 114
EPA REFUSES TO IDENTIFY SAMPLE 120
 Jan
AN OPEN INVITATION

Jan
AN OPEN INVITATION
Jan 1, 2000

AN OPEN INVITATION:

The following invitation remains open to ANY individual that challenges the veracity of evidence
presented on www.carnicominstitute.org:

If the individual will arrange an interview on CBS 60 minutes, or an equivalent national

counterpart, evidence gathered thus far will be submitted to the nation for review.
Evaluation of the evidence requires participation
by independent experts in biochemistry, photography, videography, meteorology, physics,
chemistry, aviation,
photogrammetry, microbiology and spectral analysis.
A visual medium is required for sufficient examination and analysis.

This invitation is open to ANYONE with doubt of the evidence presented.

Please let me know when the time and date is

arranged.

Thank you.
Clifford E Carnicom

1
 Jan
ABC NEWS 20/20 SAYS 'UNFORTUNATELY' IT WAS NOT CHOSEN

ABC NEWS 20/20 SAYS 'UNFORTUNATELY' IT WAS NOT CHOSEN

Jan 5, 2000

ABC NEWS 20/20 SAYS ‘UNFORTUNATELY’

IT WAS NOT CHOSEN

—–Original Message—–
From: ABCTV News 20-20 Online PF <ABCTV.News.20.20.Online@abc.com>
To: destini@softdisk.com <destini@softdisk.com>
Date: Wednesday, January 05, 2000 8:11 AM
Subject: RE: ’20/20? via ABCNEWS.com

>Dear 20/20 Viewer:

>
>Thank you for your recent e-mail suggesting a story for 20/20. Given
the high volume of letters we receive daily, we apologize for the delay in
>responding to your e-mail.
>
>As you know, each 20/20 broadcast features three subjects, which we
must select from hundreds of ideas. Your e-mail was forwarded to the Story
>Editor. It has been read and discussed but unfortunately, it was not
chosen to become one of our show segments.
>
>Thank you for being in touch with 20/20. We appreciate you thinking of
us.
>
>Sincerely,
>
>The Story Editor
>ABC News 20/20

>
>—–Original Message—–
>From: destini@softdisk.com [mailto:destini@softdisk.com]
>Sent: Monday, November 08, 1999 7:37 PM
>To: ABCTV.News.20.20.Online@abc.com
>Subject: ’20/20? via ABCNEWS.com
>
>from = destini@softdisk.com
>name = STACEY THORNTON
>question = Hi~
>I wanted to ask if you guys have already, or would be interested in
>investigating the mysterious chem trails that have been appearing in
our skies over the last 10 months, and getting to the bottom of just
exactly what it is that’s being released into the atmosphere, who is
responsible for it, and why no one is willing to take responsibility for it.
>These chemical trails are being sprayed out of high altitude aircraft
on a regular basis, and unlike the usual airline con trails, these criss
cross the skies, are thick, dense, and expand, fanning out into a sort of
wispy, cirrus type cloud that blankets the sky, and remains for upwards of an

2
 Jan
ABC NEWS 20/20 SAYS 'UNFORTUNATELY' IT WAS NOT CHOSEN

hour.
>
>They can be seen frequently south of Shreveport (Louisiana) and
originate over the base (about 8 miles east of where I am)…yet when folks at
the base (Barksdale Air Force)have been asked, they *know nothing*, *have
no idea what it is we’re talking about*, and *never saw anything*. We as
>residents who observe this know better and don’t appreciate being
>stonewalled. It’s the BASE for god’s sakes. It’s not like they AREN’T
gonna know it when a large number of aircraft are in the skies over the base
and surrounding area spraying out miles of thick dense substances…upwards
of 15+ streaks at a time, criss crossing each other.
>I became aware of this in February this year. I watched the spraying
>continue for several months before it was brought to my attention that
this spraying is going on all over the country, always within 10 miles of an
air base, and speculation has it it’s either some kind of covert anthrax
>innoculation or some kind of weather manipulation nonsense.
>I was directed to a huge website concerning this stuff and was
mortified to see what I am seeing.
>(www.contrailconnection.com I believe is the url). This is bizarre. I
>thought it was just local but it isn’t. It’s all over the place, even
in other countries and it’s got a huge number of people alarmed…and
no one is talking about what it is, where it’s coming from or who’s doing it.
>Whatever it is, there IS some unknown chemical being released and it IS
>becoming more common, and there are scores of photos coming in from all
>over, as well as VIDEO FOOTAGE we personally took this passed Thrusday
>afternoon, Nov. 4th. for about an hour with this going on. Also have
photos from Feb/March this year.
>
>The folks at the base aren’t talking even tho it’s plainly obvious
they’re going to be aware of it.
>I have contacted the other local news stations and some other consumer
>organizations to bring this to light.
>WHAT is being sprayed?
>WHY is it being aprayed?
>WHO is responsible for it and WHY are they NOT copping to it?
>WHY is the public at large NOT being notified?
>Is this chemical toxic? Is it responsible for the increase in viral and
>upper respitory infections coming into local hospitals? Increasing
>complaints of headaches, hacking coughs and bodily aches?
>This is all happening within a day or two of the spraying, from many
folks who’d been outside during the times it was falling.
>
>Please contact me for more info, and if there’s any investigators there
who are actually willing to dig and not choke down convenient answers. This
>might effect all of us.
>I, and my neighbors, and a whole slew of other people want to know
what’s going on here.
>
>We need someone to look into this.
>Thanks for your time.

3
 Jan
ABC NEWS 20/20 SAYS 'UNFORTUNATELY' IT WAS NOT CHOSEN

>I have video available for anyone interested.

>
>Stacey Thornton
>destini@softdisk.com

>
>
>subj = ’20/20? via ABCNEWS.com
>

4
 Jan
WORLD NET DAILY 'PASSES' FOR THE TIME BEING

WORLD NET DAILY 'PASSES' FOR THE TIME BEING

Jan 13, 2000

WORLD NET DAILY ‘PASSES’ FOR THE TIME BEING

Notice has been received on 01-13-00 that the World Net Daily, a leading internet newspaper, will be
‘passing’ on the presentation of an article on the aerosol issue. Two days prior to this announcement,
an impending article on the aerosol issue was indicated by this same newspaper. No specific reason for
the cancellation or postponement of the article was stated, other than that the issue had been forwarded
to higher editorial management.

The particular journalist reporting on the status of the article provided the above information to me as a
courtesy, and the decision of retraction at this time is apparently a decision of higher staff at this
newspaper.

Clifford E Carnicom
01-13-00

5
 Jan
REPRESENTATIVE UDALL FAILS TO RESPOND

REPRESENTATIVE UDALL FAILS TO RESPOND

Jan 19, 2000

REPRESENTATIVE UDALL FAILS TO RESPOND

A prominent Santa Fe media person delivered a comprehensive briefing package on the aerosol issue to
Representative Thomas Udall of New Mexico on September 2 1999. This 3 ring binder package of
materials was directly delivered to him in person, and it included photographs, testimonies, research
references and petitions for congressional action. The request for prompt evaluation of the material and
for response to the citizens of New Mexico was made at that time.

No response of any type was forthcoming through November of 1999. On November 30 1999 a second
letter was sent to Mr. Udall by this same citizen, reiterating the need for a prompt and thorough public
response to the issues raised.

No such response by Mr. Udall has been received to this date. A third letter has now been generated to
once again emphasize the duty and obligation of Mr. Udall to respond to the materials and
correspondence which have repeatedly been delivered to him.

Until action is provided to the contrary, it is now to be interpreted by the citizens of New Mexico that Mr.
Udall refuses to respond to information provided to him on the aerosol issue. Full disclosure is
demanded on the part of all public servants surrounding this national controversy. This lack of action by
Mr. Udall, even though the requests have been made in a courteous and formal fashion, is now to be
publicly disclosed to the widest audience possible. Citizens of New Mexico as well as of the United
States are encouraged to seek full accountability for Mr. Udall’s delays, and to continue to seek his
immediate and prompt reply to the materials which have been made available to him.

Clifford E Carnicom

January 19 2000

REPRESENTATIVE TOM UDALL, NM

CALLS FOR OVERSIGHT HEARINGS
The following letter was received by a citizen on March 13 2000:

6
 Jan
REPRESENTATIVE UDALL FAILS TO RESPOND

REPRESENTATIVE UDALL RECANTS

A spokesperson for Representative Udall has commented on this letter within an article

7
 Jan
REPRESENTATIVE UDALL FAILS TO RESPOND

published in the Santa Fe New Mexican newspaper in the Spring of 2000. The spokesperson has
stated that Mr. Udall has not personally requested that any such congressional hearings take
place, and that Mr. Udall has only “forwarded” such a request to Congress on behalf of the
original constituent, and that he personally has not asked for hearings to be held. Readers may
judge for themselves the intent of the formal letter posted above.

Clifford E Carnicom
July 10 2000

8
 Jan
PORT COLUMBUS AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL RESPONSE

PORT COLUMBUS AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL RESPONSE

Jan 19, 2000

PORT COLUMBUS AIR TRAFFIC

CONTROL RESPONSE

The following account was received on Jan 19 2000:

When queried about the many x’s and gridlines being laid down over
downtown Columbus, Ohio, a representative of the Port Columbus Air
Traffic Control Operations Station put me on hold indicating “It might
just be normal traffic.” However, when the representative came back on
the line he told me that “They [the aircraft] are doing photographic
work [over downtown Columbus, Ohio].”

9
 Jan
ATMOSPHERIC PLASMA - KINETIC ENERGY MODEL

ATMOSPHERIC PLASMA - KINETIC ENERGY MODEL

Jan 21, 2000

ATMOSPHERIC PLASMA – KINETIC ENERGY MODEL

Clifford E Carnicom
Jan 21 2004

EARTH ENTERING UNCHARTED WATERS

“There are significant risks of rapid and irreversible changes”
BBC Article January 20, 2004
www.rense.com

Opening Remarks:

This page contains a model that attempts to describe the kinetic energy that can be accumulated
within a plasma state. A plasma is an electrically conductive gas; considerable evidence now
exists that our atmosphere now exists in that state as a result of the aerosol operations that have
been conducted openly without consent for more than five years. The model is based upon an
examination of plasma physics and the propagation of electromagnetic energy within a plasma
state.

[Editors note: The Java Applet that used to appear here in the document no longer seems to work in
modern browsers. Therefore, we are attaching the source code originally used, and perhaps someone
can get it working again. 3/26/16]

The model presented is reasonably complex, and additional information on the development will
be presented in the future. It is offered in this preliminary state so that users can begin
investigating the effect of various conditions and alterations of the atmosphere. This model of
kinetic energy of the atmosphere is dependent upon the following variables at the present time:

1. The electron density of the gas (atmosphere), which can be increased by the user with a
scaling factor. The electron density will increase from lower elevations to upper elevations.

2. The thickness and location of the atmospheric shell above the earth where the electron density
exists. This is expressed in meters in a range from 0 to 300,000 meters (~200 miles). The upper
and lower limits of the shell can be varied such that the effect of the location and size of the shell
can be studied.

3. The electrical field strength of the atmosphere. The effect from the electrical field strength of
the atmosphere will decrease significantly with altitude. It will be seen that the LOWER
atmosphere plays an important role in the accumulation of energy, due to the increased electrical
field strength of the atmosphere at lower elevations. The importance of this fact should be
considered carefully with any assessments of the intent or motive of the aerosol operations.

4. The plasma frequency, or the “resonant” frequency of the electrically conductive gas, plasma,
or atmosphere in this case.

5. An introduced Extremely Low Frequency (ELF) modulating wave into the plasma. The following
statement can be considered carefully in the exploration of this model:

10
 Jan
ATMOSPHERIC PLASMA - KINETIC ENERGY MODEL

“A high-frequency wave whose amplitude is slowly modulated is a simple type of wave that
builds up gradually in time and thus serves well in calculating electric energy density”.1

6. A reference point of equivalency of kinetic energy; in this case the kinetic energy change that
results from a one second per year decrease in the rotational rate of the earth. Other reference
points of energy, such as that contained in fossil fuels may be presented in the future.

7. An efficiency factor of conversion of kinetic energy to that of another form, such as the energy
changes associated with any rotational rate changes of the earth. As one example of conversion
efficiency, the HAARP (High Altitude Active Auroral Research Program) facility mentions a
conversion rate efficiency of 1 in 100 million to produce ELF radiation.

8. The existence of abundant photons in the upper atmosphere.

9. The existence of metallic aerosols of low work function in the atmosphere.

10. The conversion of photons to electrons via the photoelectric effect.

It may be insightful for the user to consider the following questions when exploring the effects of
changes in the model:

1. What has the most influence in the accumulation of kinetic energy in the plasma (i.e., modified
atmosphere) – electron density as changed with the scaling factor, electron density as a function
of altitude, the ELF modulation frequency, the location of the atmospheric shell or the thickness
of the atmospheric shell, the photon density, the photoelectric effect and the conversion of
photons to electrons, or the work function of various metallic aerosols? Are all of the above
important factors in the accumulation of kinetic energy within the atmosphere?

2. Is the accumulation of kinetic energy within the plasma greater at altitude or closer to the
earth’s surface? If so, why?

3. Where is the effect of the electrical field strength of the earth the greatest – at lower elevations
or higher elevations? What is the effect of this upon the kinetic energy that can be accumulated
within the plasma?

4. Where is the electron density the greatest – at lower elevations or higher elevations? What is
the effect of this upon the kinetic energy that can be accumulated within the plasma?

5. Which has a greater effect and at what altitude is the effect the greatest – the accumulation of
energy through modulated ELF in conjunction with the plasma frequency and the electric field, or
the conversion of photos to electrons in combination with metallic aerosols of low work
function?

6. What effect would an increased energy state of an atmosphere have? What could the energy
be used for? Would an increase in kinetic energy of a surrounding plasma shell influence the
kinetic energy state of the earth itself? If there is an effect upon the earth, what type of
conversion efficiency is expected?

11
 Jan
ATMOSPHERIC PLASMA - KINETIC ENERGY MODEL

7. What is the source of any ELF energy that might be introduced into the plasma? How large of a
region does ELF effect? Does ELF have any effect upon biology as well?

8. Is the sun an additional source of energy into a plasma? If so, can this energy source also be
incorporated into the model?

9. What is the source of electrons within a plasma? What are the sources of ionization within a
plasma? What is the work function of a metal? Can some metals be ionized with the energy of
ultraviolet light? If so, what metals? What about the influence of high energy solar radiation,
such as gamma rays? What is the effect of solar storms upon a plasma?

10. Are there any similarities in the concepts embodied within this model and of HAARP ? If so,
what are the shared principles?

11. What methods could be used to increase the electron density of a plasma, i.e., the
atmosphere?

12. What are some other examples of reference energy levels that can be used for comparison,
beyond that of changes in the earth rotational rate? What are levels of energy involved with
geophysical processes, such as volcanoes? How much energy is contained within solar storms
and sunlight itself? What about the energy of fossil fuels? Is it conceivable that the kinetic
energy state of the earth could be modified? If so, what would it take to accomplish it? How
much energy can be accumulated within a plasma? What are the primary factors that affect this
energy density?

13. Is there any evidence that the energy of the earth has changed more recently? What is the
relationship between the magnetic field of the earth and the rotational rate change of the earth?
Is the magnetic field of the earth increasing or decreasing, and if so, by how much? Is this
change a constant? The same questions are to be asked for the rate of rotational rate changes of
the earth. Are there any anomalies in the data that is available to the public? Is the magnetic and
rotational rate data consistent with each other? How is the Schumann frequency affected by
electron density? Has the Schumann frequency been increasing or decreasing in the recent
past? Is the Schumann frequency affected by solar radiation, and if so, how?

14. Does the consideration of the kinetic energy state change of the atmosphere obviate or
strengthen the consideration of environmental, biological, military or electromagnetic
applications of an altered atmosphere? Are there relationships between each of these
considerations, especially as they pertain to the management and control of energy?

15. What are the effects of aerosols upon the heating of the atmosphere? What is specific heat
and how can it be used to interpret the effects of sunlight upon particulates? Does it matter
where the aerosols are located in their effect upon the heating of the earth? What is the effect of
the location of the plasma shell upon the heat balance of the earth? How does this compare to
the location of the most prominent electromagnetic effects? Are thermal energies,
electromagnetic energies and kinetic energies of equal concern in the evaluation of the motives
behind the aerosol operations? Could one form of these energies be of greater concern or
interest in terms of motive than another?

This model and page and supplementary documents that support the development of the model
will be revised and modified as is appropriate. Future considerations will attempt to include solar

12
 Jan
ATMOSPHERIC PLASMA - KINETIC ENERGY MODEL

thermal effects upon the earth within the model. . It is anticipated that revisions will occur to this
presentation and model in the future. The mathematics of the model will be presented on a
separate page at a later date. Please allow fair time and patience to evaluate the effects of
variables in the model; some fairly complicated dynamics are contained within it. Please feel free
to discuss and mention any significant deficiencies that may be observed to exist within the
modeling process. This model exists as an ongoing project to assist in the interpretation of one
important potential aspect of the aerosol operations.

1. Charles Herach Papas, Theory of Electromagnetic Wave Propagation, (Dover Publications,

1988), 180.

FURTHER DISCUSSION

13
 Jan
FIRST CALL FOR CONGRESSIONAL AND STATE GOVERNOR RESPONSES

FIRST CALL FOR CONGRESSIONAL AND STATE GOVERNOR RESPONSES

Jan 26, 2000

FIRST CALL FOR CONGRESSIONAL

AND STATE GOVERNOR RESPONSES:
January 26 2000

The process of submitting protest letters via www.carnicom.com began on Nov 20 1999, and thus
far includes over 1700 letters sent to federal and state officials. This statement affects letters that
have been sent to state officials only.

The following number of protest letters on the aerosol issue have been delivered via
www.carnicom.com to the individual senators and governors of each state:

AL 16 AR 6 AZ 42 CA 36 CO 12 FL 4 GA 6 HI 3 IN 4 MO 6 MI 21 MN 3 MO 3 NC 18 NJ 6 NM 24 NV
12 NY 6 OH 3 OK 6 PA 9 SC 2 SD 3 TN 3 TX 14 UT 3 VA 4 WI 6 TOTAL 281

The majority of auto responses from the senators and governors declare that a personal reply
will be sent to the sender if the individual’s name and address has been provided. Such is the
case.

No responses from original senders have been forwarded to me as of this date. If any individual
has received a response from the submission of a protest letter via www.carnicom.com please
forward it to me by email if you wish to have it posted in a public forum. Individual identities of
individuals will be held confidential as requested.

If positive identification of receipt has been made and if it can be verified after 60 days that the
original sender has not received a reply from the appropriate official, such lack of action by the
government official will be posted in a public forum. All efforts will be made to allow for sufficient
time for response. Public posting of any responses that have been received is encouraged and it
will be supported.

Public servants and government officials will be held accountable on the aerosol issue in a
public fashion for their actions or inactions on a timely basis. It will be beneficial if all senders of
original protest letters will make any responses received available for the public to evaluate.

Thank you.

Clifford E Carnicom

14
 Jan
OFFICE OF SECRETARY OF DEFENSE STATES 'NO CAUSE FOR ALARM'

OFFICE OF SECRETARY OF DEFENSE STATES 'NO CAUSE FOR ALARM'

Jan 28, 2000

OFFICE OF SECRETARY OF DEFENSE STATES

‘NO CAUSE FOR ALARM’

The following message by the Department of Defense was recently

posted on the Chemtrail Tracking Club at Yahoo

January 28, 2000

Dear Mr:

Thank you for your message to President Clinton regarding aircraft

vapor trails. Owing to the nature of your concerns, officials at the
White House forwarded your e-mail to the Department of Defense for reply.

I am familiar with some of the reports on this issue, but find them
unsubstantiated by the facts. There is certainly no cause for alarm.

Sincerely yours,

Harold Heilsnis
Director for Public Communication
Office of the Secretary of Defense (Public Affairs)

15
 Feb
SANTE FE FORMATIONS

Feb
SANTE FE FORMATIONS
Feb 8, 2000

SANTE FE FORMATIONS
February 8 2000 0945

16
Feb
SANTE FE FORMATIONS

17
 Feb
COLORED CLOUDS

COLORED CLOUDS
Feb 9, 2000

COLORED CLOUDS

The
following account was received on Feb 9 2000 along with the photographs above:

“I was outside filming today and happened to catch these photos. You couldn’t see the colors with the
naked eye. At first I thought there was something wrong with the camcorder, but it wasn’t the camera.
This rainbow chemcloud only lasted approx. 2 minutes and then dissipated. It was very bright pink,
green, yellow and purple! There was a distinct smell of geraniums and peaches in the air at the same
time. I haven’t smelled that since last summer when we had yellow rain. So far, I haven’t found anyone
who has seen this. Note that it was 2:30 in the afternoon and overcast (no reflection from sunrise or
sunset).

If you know of anyone else who has seen similar I’d be interested. Thanks.”

Vicki Henry
McAlester, OK

18
 Feb
Defense Bio Testing 1977

Defense Bio Testing 1977

Feb 9, 2000

Defense Bio Testing 1977

19
Feb
Defense Bio Testing 1977

20
Feb
Defense Bio Testing 1977

21
Feb
Defense Bio Testing 1977

22
Feb
Defense Bio Testing 1977

23
 Feb
THIRD GROUND SAMPLE RECEIVED

THIRD GROUND SAMPLE RECEIVED

Feb 10, 2000

THIRD GROUND SAMPLE RECEIVED

FEBRUARY 10 2000

24
Feb
THIRD GROUND SAMPLE RECEIVED

25
Feb
THIRD GROUND SAMPLE RECEIVED

26
 Feb
THIRD GROUND SAMPLE RECEIVED

This ground sample has recently arrived from California. There is limited information available
regarding the conditions of sampling at this time. Magnification provided is 200x. The material is
white and of powder or granular form. It’s presence was regarded as being unusual by the
collector of the sample. It is immediately soluble in sulfuric acid. The characteristics of this
material are in no way similar to the microscopic fibrous material which has been received
earlier. Additional information will be provided on this sample as it becomes available or as
further analysis of the material warrants. The average measured size of the particles shown is
approximately 200 microns, or approximately 2-3 times the thickness of a human hair.

27
 Feb
THIRD GROUND SAMPLE RECEIVED

The above two photographs depict the referenced ground sample with a normal camera lens. The
significance of this ground sample, as well as the identification of it, remains unknown. The material
shown apparently is on the inside of a garage wall, and therefore even exposure to the elements
remains an uncertainty at this time. If a more complete description of the conditions of sampling and
photographing become known, this information will be presented. In contrast, if further clarifying
information does not become available, it is not expected that it will be investigated further than that
which is shown herein. It will be maintained as a reference should any further similar materials be
received. The following statement regarding the samples shown on this page has been received Feb 27
2000:

“The enclosed are the photos I took before collecting the sample. The white substance was approx. 7-10
days old and most was stuck to the concrete. I used a piece of typing paper to scrape as much up as
possible. I cannot say, for certain, than any contrails were observed on the day I first noticed the sample.
I can say, however, that I have observed numerous contrails in the Sacramento area.”

28
 Feb
EPA CONTINUES TO BE 'UNAWARE'

EPA CONTINUES TO BE 'UNAWARE'

Feb 25, 2000

EPA CONTINUES TO BE ‘UNAWARE’

FEBRUARY 25 2000

—–Original Message—–
From: Chet France[SMTP:BORUSHKO.MARGARET@epamail.epa.gov]
Sent: Friday, February 25, 2000 6:22 AM
To: xxxxxxx
Subject: Response to AX0000628

Dear Ms. Ray:

We have been asked to respond to your E-mail of January 19,

2000, to Carol M. Browner, Administrator, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), expressing your
concern about fibers the Chemtrail Research Fund state are *falling from the sky,* following aircraft
flights. We appreciate this matter being brought to the attention of the EPA. We are not aware of any
program to disperse fibrous material on U.S. population centers or other parts of the country from jet or
any other type of aircraft. What we can do is briefly explain how jet engine exhaust occasionally forms
contrails, and what EPA is doing to reduce the emissions from these aircraft engines as a byproduct of
fuel combustion.

Jet aircraft engines emit tiny particles that serve as condensation nuclei. High-altitude water vapor
collects on these particles, crystallizes, in turn creating streaks of frozen water vapor, otherwise known
as contrails, from airplanes operating at high altitudes. Some contrails join with other contrails and
expand into huge, natural-looking clouds of cirrus characteristics that can cover large areas of the sky.
(Cirrus clouds are wispy white, usually a natural phenomenon, consisting of minute ice crystals formed at
high altitudes of 20,000 to 40,000 feet.) Research by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration
(NASA) has recognized this process of jet aircraft cloud formation as a potential problem for blocking
sunlight, but not solar heat reaching the earth, thereby acting as a thermal blanket and perhaps
contributing to global warming.

A 1999 report issued by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, entitled, Aviation and the
Global Atmosphere, discusses contrail formation and its effects in more detail. A copy of this report
(ISBN number 0 521 66300 8) may be ordered through Cambridge University Press* website at
www.cup.org. The influence of contrails on cirrus clouds is noted as a key area of scientific uncertainty
that limits the ability to project aviation impacts on climate and ozone. Further work is required to reduce
scientific and other uncertainties of aviation impacts. EPA and the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA)
fully support continued research to address these issues.

In regard to air quality impacts, although jet aircraft contribute much less air pollution than that from
motor vehicles, their overall emissions are increasing every year as air travel becomes more popular. In
addition, jet aircraft can contribute significantly to ground-level ambient air pollution in the immediate
vicinity of an airport, especially emissions of oxides of nitrogen (NOx) and hydrocarbons (HCs) which
contribute to the formation of ozone. Additional, detailed information on aircraft emissions can be found
in a recently published EPA Office of Mobile Sources (OMS) report, Evaluation of Air Pollutant Emissions
from Subsonic Commercial Jet Aircraft, April 1999. This report is available at OMS* Aviation Emissions

29
 Feb
EPA CONTINUES TO BE 'UNAWARE'

web site (www.epa.gov/oms/aviation.htm). It provides an estimation of the contribution of aircraft to air

quality emissions in ten urban areas.
The aircraft emission standards for gas turbine (jet) engines
which power civil aircraft have been in place for about twenty years.
Before an engine type can be sold or installed on an aircraft, the
manufacturer must test its emissions on the ground by simulating in-use conditions. EPA sets the
emission standards for the engines, and the FAA monitors the certification process and enforces the
standards. Emission standards apply to essentially all commercial aircraft, comprising scheduled and
freight airlines. Two classes of aircraft, military and general aviation, are presently not covered. Controls
on engine smoke and prohibitions on fuel venting were instituted in 1974 and have been revised several
times since then. Beginning in 1984, limits were placed on the amount of unburned HCs * also termed
volatile organic compounds (VOCs) * which turbine engines can emit per landing and takeoff cycle.

In May of 1997, EPA adopted the current emission standards for gas turbine engines of the International
Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) for NOx and carbon monoxide (CO). In addition, in the near future,
EPA plans to adopt the more stringent NOx standards expected to be formally accepted by ICAO later
this year, for implementation in 2004. EPA is committed and working to reduce emissions from jet engine
exhaust. I hope this letter will help answer your questions. Please feel free to contact us if you have any
further questions.
Sincerely,

Chester J. France, Director

Assessment and Standards Division

30
 Mar
CAROL M. BROWNER (EPA) RECEIVES GROUND SAMPLE

Mar
CAROL M. BROWNER (EPA) RECEIVES GROUND SAMPLE
Mar 1, 2000

CAROL M. BROWNER (EPA) RECEIVES GROUND SAMPLE

NO RESPONSE TO DATE

Certified Receipt of Delivery of Ground

Sample by Carol M. Browner’s Office Jan 20 2000

31
Mar
CAROL M. BROWNER (EPA) RECEIVES GROUND SAMPLE

32
 Mar
GROUND SAMPLE SENT CERTIFIED MAIL TO EPA

GROUND SAMPLE SENT CERTIFIED MAIL TO EPA

Mar 1, 2000

GROUND SAMPLE SENT CERTIFIED MAIL TO EPA

33
Mar
GROUND SAMPLE SENT CERTIFIED MAIL TO EPA

34
Mar
GROUND SAMPLE SENT CERTIFIED MAIL TO EPA

35
 Mar
BOOM ATTRACTS MAINSTREAM MEDIA

BOOM ATTRACTS MAINSTREAM MEDIA

Mar 1, 2000

BOOM ATTRACTS MAINSTREAM MEDIA

RECENT ARTICLE FROM THE COLUMBUS, GEORGIA
LEDGER ENQUIRER FEB 11 2000
SUBMITTED TO www.carnicom.com
BY A CONCERNED CITIZEN

36
Mar
BOOM ATTRACTS MAINSTREAM MEDIA

37
Mar
BOOM ATTRACTS MAINSTREAM MEDIA

38
 Mar
MICROSCOPIC PARTICLE COUNT STUDY NEW MEXICO 1996-1999

MICROSCOPIC PARTICLE COUNT STUDY NEW MEXICO 1996-1999

Mar 23, 2000

MICROSCOPIC
PARTICLE COUNT STUDY
NEW MEXICO 1996-1999
Clifford E Carnicom March 23 2000

Clifford E Carnicom March 23 2000

A study of the airborne microscopic particle count data from the State of New Mexico covering the years
1996-1999 has been conducted. Approximately 175,000 observations of hourly monitored data from five
stations in the state have been analyzed; this represents a sizable statistical sample. The statistical test
that has been designed questions the difference between the data of 1999 vs. the combined data of the
three previous years: 1996, 1997 and 1998. The data which has been measured is the airborne particles
which measure less than or equal to 10 microns in size (PM10) ( a human hair is approximately 60-100
microns in thickness). The design of this test results from the fact that aerial spraying over the United
States has been repeatedly observed and documented with photographs and personal testimony
through the course of 1999 and 2000. Records of such spray activity are not available on any
widespread basis for the years 1996-1998, and that lack forms the basis for statistical investigation of the
relevant data.

The results show that there is a significant statistical difference between the magnitudes, averages, and
variances of the two data sets in the state of New Mexico. There is an increase of 16% in the magnitude
of the average microscopic particle count data of 1999 vs. the average of the combined years of
1996-1998. The differences between the averages of these two data sets is significant at the 99.9% plus
level. Lastly, the differences between the variances (indicative of data distribution) are also equally
significant at the 99.9% plus level. Normal distributions are assumed in the analysis.

The conclusion to be reached from this study is that the microscopic air particle count in the state of New
Mexico in 1999 is significantly different from that of the preceding three years, and that this difference is
directly correlated with the observations of aerial spraying that have taken place during this same time
period. The results of this study form a further basis for criminal investigation of the documented spray
activity, and for congressional hearings on this subject. This initial study further substantiates those
findings that have been presented which document the crimes of aerial spraying against the American
people without their informed consent. These findings include numerous telephotos of offending aircraft
with extensive spray methods easily visible, cloud progression photographic series, meteorological
studies in an arid environment that defy any basis for cloud formation, a certified receipt ground sample
which to this date has not been identified by Carol M. Browner, Administrator, United States
Environmental Protection Agency, repeated letters of denial and discount by official agencies of the
United States government, refusal of or inadequate response by William Jefferson Clinton, William
Cohen (DoD), Janet Reno (Attorney General), Carol M. Browner (EPA) , and Jane Garvey (FAA),
repeated refusal of response by the various state senators and governors, as well as hundreds of
thousands of eye witness accounts and testimony recorded from the beginning of 1999 to the present
day.

Clifford E Carnicom
March 23, 2000

APPENDIX:

39
 Mar
MICROSCOPIC PARTICLE COUNT STUDY NEW MEXICO 1996-1999

Source of data : New Mexico Environment Department – Air Quality

No. of observations from five monitoring stations 1996-1998 : 129410
No. of observations from five monitoring stations 1999 : 43449
Measured quantity : PM10(<=10microns)
Mean of observations 1996-1998 : 39.42 micrograms/cubic meter
Mean of observations 1999 : 45.70 micrograms/cubic meter
Standard deviation of observations 1996-1998 : 111.69micrograms/cubic meter
Standard deviation of observations 1999 : 134.57micrograms/cubic meter
Zm Statistic : 11.65
F Statistic : 1.45

Readers from other states are encouraged to request similiar data for further analysis. Please feel free to
contact me (Clifford Carnicom) for additional assistance in this matter.

40
 Mar
MYCOPLASMA PNEUMONIAE INFORMATION

MYCOPLASMA PNEUMONIAE INFORMATION

Mar 23, 2000

MYCOPLASMA PNEUMONIAE INFORMATION

Source : Microbiology, Eugene W. Nester, 1978

41
 Mar
MYCOPLASMA PNEUMONIAE INFORMATION

Source : The Merck Manual, 1982

The main divisions of the respiratory tract.

Source: Basic Histology, L.C. Junqueira, 1977

42
 Mar
MYCOPLASMA PNEUMONIAE INFORMATION

Mycoplasma Pneumonia : X Rays

Source : Essentials of Roentgen Interpretation, John H. Juhl, 1981

43
 Apr
FLEET FORMATION

Apr
FLEET FORMATION
Apr 1, 2000

FLEET FORMATION
April 1 2000
Santa Fe NM

44
Apr
FLEET FORMATION

45
 Apr
A CITIZEN'S CHRONICLE OF INQUIRIES

A CITIZEN'S CHRONICLE OF INQUIRIES

Apr 6, 2000

A CITIZEN’S CHRONICLE OF INQUIRIES

AEROSOL COMPLAINT SUMMARY
(4/6/00 – INCOMPLETE)

CONTACT INQUIRIES RESPONSES

Bill Clinton 2 0

Al Gore 2 0
Barbara Boxer 12 0

Dianne Feinstein 12 0

Mary Bono 3 0

Henry Waxman 3 1

L.A. Times 4 0

L.A. Weekly 3 0
CA. Attorney General 2 1
KABC TV 7 8 0
KTLA TV News 3 1
AQMD 10 2

EPA 2 1

Santa Monica 2 1

City Officials 7 3

Unfortunately I did not save all letters or reponses when I sent or

received them, naively thinking that I wouldn’t need a record of this
later when the problem was solved (yeah, right!).

For the sake of brevity I won’t include all emails, but a sampling of
those I sent and received.

I would like to preface this by saying that the strident tone of some of
these letters is not really typical of my nature, but a result of my
frustration. Most of my original letters which I did not save were
merely cordial and inquisitive.

46
 Apr
A CITIZEN'S CHRONICLE OF INQUIRIES

Boxer Letters:

Boxer: 3/11

Dear Senator Boxer,

You must be as sick of me as I am of you (no, actually that’s not

possible). Its me, you know, the crackpot who is convinced that the
government is engaged in a massive and illegal campaign to spray an
unknown substance on it’s own citizens.

Here’s a couple of photos from today (Santa Monica, 11:00 A.M. – Just
normal jet traffic right?).

Not that you will check it out, but here are links to several of the
over 100 websites investigating this crime independently of our elected
officials. Sure are a lot of us uninformed nut cases – and thousands
more every week, many of them California voters who want to know why you
are silent on this issue. I’ll make it my business to
report your inactivity on as many websites as possible, especially the
California ones.

And I’m a former supporter – others won’t be as kind as I am.

Rick Moors

—————————————————————–

Boxer 1/25

Dear Senator Boxer,

Please see the attached link and video still from a recent ABC News
program shot in Rogers, Ark. The program was about how Latinos are
changing the face of politics in America. I don’t know about you, but I
see something else in the photograph that will be changing the face of
politics as well. Check the link, if you dare:
http://www.neosoft.com/~cshramek/.

While you still have any credibility, please tell us (remember us, your
constituents?) what’s going on. You do not represent the military, or
the CIA, or whoever else is perpetrating this. You should be telling US
what is going on.

Sincerely,

Rick Moors

—————————————————————-

47
 Apr
A CITIZEN'S CHRONICLE OF INQUIRIES

1/12/00

Dear Senator Boxer,

Sorry about the “Big Contribution” in the subject area of this e-mail. I
thought it might increase my chances of someone actually reading this.
I am a big fan of Democracy and I know you are too, so I am hoping you
can help me locate the wording of this law quoted below which was
repealed recently. It has to do with the use of human beings as test
subjects in chemical and biological experiments. I’ve tried everywhere,
and belive it or not, I can’t find out for the life of me WHAT was
repealed. Here it is:

CHAPTER 32 – CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL

WARFARE PROGRAM
US Code as of: 01/26/98

Sec. 1511. Repealed. Pub. L. 104-106, div. A, title X, Sec. 1061(k),

Feb. 10, 1996, 110 Stat. 443

Sec. 1520. Repealed. Pub. L. 105-85, div. A, title X, Sec.

1078(g), Nov. 18, 1997, 111 Stat. 1916

As one of your ardent supporters, I’d really appreciate any help you can
give me on this matter. Oh, by the way, I’ve attached a couple of photos
I took outside my house on Christmas day with my new digital camera.
Wacky weather we’re having, eh?

Sincerely,

Rick Moors
—————————————————————

EPA Response to formal complaint:

Thu, 13 Jan 2000 11:37:48 -0800

From:
Lo.Doris@epamail.epa.gov
To:
rick@labridge.com
CC:
Hitchon.Frances@epamail.epa.gov

Dear Mr. Moors,

Frances Hitchon has forwarded to me the information you provided on

contrails in the LA area and asked me to respond to you. I have checked
with various people at EPA and believe that the photographs you provided
appear to represent normal situations (italics mine). Attached is a
sample of a letter that EPA has sent to several citizens that have also

48
 Apr
A CITIZEN'S CHRONICLE OF INQUIRIES

inquired about contrails. Hopefully the information in this letter will

help address some of your concerns. Please email me at
lo.doris@epa.gov or call me at 415-744-1287 if you have further
questions.
-Doris Lo, EPA Region 9 Air Division.

(See attached file: contrails.WPD)

Frances Hitchon
01/12/2000 11:37 AM

To: Doris Lo/R9/USEPA/US@EPA

cc: David Tomsovic/R9/USEPA/US@EPA, Sara Segal/R9/USEPA/US@EPA, Paul
Carroll/R9/USEPA/US@EPA
Subject: Suspicious contrails in Los Angeles during Dec/Jan

Doris,
Here’s the information that I requested from the citizen from the
Los
Angeles area about the contrails. He’s taken many more photos, but I
think he said that the jets were too far away to be able to make out who
owns them. He could provide a general description of what it looked
like.

Frances
———————- Forwarded by Frances Hitchon/R9/USEPA/US on
01/12/2000
11:30 AM —————————
—————————————————————-

Here’s my latest go-around with Fox TV11 (In reverse order, of course!)

Dear Fox,

Sorry to hear that you won’t be putting the team on this one. And I had
you pegged as real pit bulls!! I guess when Uncle Sam turns up the
heat, you get out of the kitchen pronto!

Glad you liked my photos anyway. Here’ s several more I took

yesterday. If you really like them, why not get a camera and take some
for yourselves? You won’t have to wait long for a good shot!

Rick Moors

P.S. If you ever change you mind about this subject “not warranting an
investigation,” here’s several thousand people (Pilots, scientists,
retired people, students, moms, etc) who can provide you with some
info. If you can’t find what you need here, there are only about 100
more sites on the subject:

49
 Apr
A CITIZEN'S CHRONICLE OF INQUIRIES

http://www.kenwelch.com/
http://www.contrailconnection.com
http://clubs.yahoo.com/clubs/chemtrailtrackingusa
http://clubs.yahoo.com/clubs/cachemtrailreports
http://www.gilanet.com/wallace/
http://www.carnicom.com/contrails.htm
http://www.sightings.com/ufo6/chemcon.htm
http://www.sightings.com/ufo6/chemnews.htm
http://www.sightings.com/politics6/guineapigs.htm
http://www.neosoft.com/~cshramek/.
http://clubs.yahoo.com/clubs/chemtrailsphotos

Fox Undercover

Dear Rick,

Thanks for writing and for your interest in Fox Undercover. The
attached photos were very good, but I’m afraid it doesn’t appear to be
anything that would warrant an investigation.

Sincerely,
Fox Undercover

Rick Moors wrote:

> Here’s a really tough nut to crack. Find out who’s been doing this!!
> (See attached photos all taken recently in Santa Monica).
>
> I’m sure you’ll be keeping me posted on your progress.
>
> Rick Moors

—————————————————————–
Hal Fishman (KTLA TV News Anchor) Non-Response

Subject:
Re: Attn Weather and News Dept
Date:
Tue, 29 Feb 2000 06:13:38 -0600
From:
<ktla-am-news@tribune.com>
To:
Rick Moors <rick@labridge.com>, hfishman@tribune.com

Your message has been forwarded to Mr. Fishman.

______________________________ Reply Separator

_________________________________
Subject: Attn Weather and News Dept
Author: Rick Moors <rick@labridge.com> at Internet_TCO

50
 Apr
A CITIZEN'S CHRONICLE OF INQUIRIES

Date: 2/28/00 5:30 PM

Today you predicted partly cloudy weather. Is this what you meant? (See
attached photos). I took these shots today 2/28 in Santa Monica each
about an hour apart. Basically I watched a perfectly blue sky turned to
a gray hazy overcast. The cause? At least 20 high flying jet aircraft
leaving contrails that eventually spread out and covered the sky. I
photgraphed this today and will be happy to send you more photos if you
want proof. I also saw the jets through binoculars and they were of two
types: the most common was a large white 2 engine jet with no markings,
the second was a smaller 2 engine jet with an orange fuselage and white
wings and tail, also no markings.

Why do you not mention this either on the news or weather? I’m sure I’m
not the first person to have written you about this phenomenon. I have
great respect for Mr. Fishman and I understand he is also a pilot. I
would like to hear his comments about these photos. I would also like to
request that you place this correspondence in your public file so that
it can be referred back to.

Thank you,

Rick Moors

—————————————————————-

Letter to Santa Monica City Council Member Robert Holbrooke (no

response)

City council letter

Dear Mr. Holbrooke,

I am sending two photos typical of the 100 or so I have taken in Santa

Monica since Dec ’99. What you see in the photos is now pretty much a
24 hour a day occurance. These are not commercial aircraft, and the
substance they are spraying is making a lot of people sick. What are
you doing to investigate this?

Please do not suggest I call airport officials, AQMD, EPA etc. I have
tried all of them. This is going on over all our heads, and we all
breathe the same air.

Please respond.

Sincerely

Rick Moors

P.S. Photo #2 taken on 12/29/99 actually shows city hall being hit with
a big dose. I took this photo near Hill and 2nd street facing north

51
 Apr
A CITIZEN'S CHRONICLE OF INQUIRIES

towards city hall and downtown S.M.

cc: All council members

Mayor’s office
S.M. Police

—————————————————————-
Santa Monica City Council Member Mike Feinstein’s response to the above
letter:
(he has responded with several follow up letters, and I believe he is
interested)

Mike Feinstein Response

Mon, 28 Feb 2000 23:58:43 -0800

From:
Mike Feinstein <mfeinstein@feinstein.org>
To:
Rick Moors <rick@labridge.com>
References:
1,2,3,4,5,6,7

Rick

based on yours and my exchange

our staff is working on a simple vertical grid that is supposed to help

even the untrained eye distinguish what
aircraft are up there and what they are likely doing

I will let you know when they finish this

(this isn’t meant to refute anyone’s concerns, but I think it is a good

idea in and of itself, because of the concerns that people have about
these things all of the time)

————————————————————–

Other Santa Monica City Council Members/Officials responses to the same

letter:

Kevin McKeown: Responded twice, believes these are normal jet trails.
Mayor Ken Genser: Responded and asked what I thought the trails were
composed of. I emailed him back with my ideas and web links. Never
heard back from him.
Pamela O’Connor: No Response
Paul Rosenstein: No Response
Richard Bloom: No Response
James Butts, Chief of Police: No Response
—————————————————————-

52
 Apr
A CITIZEN'S CHRONICLE OF INQUIRIES

Response from L.A. Mayor Richard Riordan’s office:

Subject:
Re: Hazardous air due to jet contrails
Date:
Fri, 14 Jan 2000 12:28:06 -0800
From:
Lynda CUDLIP <lcudlip@mayor.ci.la.ca.us>
To:
rick@labridge.com

We have not received any calls or other communications like yours. You
may wish to contact the Duty Officer at the Department of Airports,
(310) 646-4265, to check on any unusual activity.

I hope this referral will be of assistance to you.

Lynda Cudlip
Mayor’s Office

>>> Rick Moors <rick@labridge.com> 01/13 2:32 pm >>>

Dear Mayor Riordan,

Have you received any complaints about increased and/or unusual

jet contrail activity in Los Angeles over Dec/Jan? On Jan 7th
we were completely inundated by jet trails at 7:00 A.M. Within
several hours, my family and neighors were ill with identical symptoms:
runny eyes, sore throats, and breathing difficulties. I am not
imagining this, nor am I a conspiracy nut. If you don’t believe me look
up. I guarantee within two days you will agree that something very
strange is going on. Please see the two attached “before and after”
photos I took at my home in Santa Monica. The first I took at 7:00 A.M.
and the second at 9:00 A.M. You’re an honest man. Have you ever seen
anything like this before in L.A?

Please don’t suggest I email the AQMD, or Sen Boxer, etc. This is going
on over your city and it’s making lots of people sick. If you need
further evidence I will send you photos from almost any given day in the
last month of similar unusual activity.

Thanks for your time,

Rick Moors

—————————————————————-
L.A. Times Letter 1/00

Most of my previous letters to the Times were not this sarcastic, but
this is after about 4 previous emails to which I received no response.

53
 Apr
A CITIZEN'S CHRONICLE OF INQUIRIES

1/12/00

Times letter

Has anyone at your “newspaper” bothered to go outside and look up within

the last month? If not, I am attaching two photos which will save you
the trouble. They were shot two hours apart on the morning of 1/7 in
Santa Monica.. Get the picture? This has been happening almost
constantly since early December and has made my family, neighbors and I
ill.

Maybe one of your “crack” reporters could be assigned to watch the sky
for a few days and see what he/she observes.

Thanks for your time,

Rick
Moors
—————————————————————–

My Response to Rep. Henry Waxman’s suggestion that I contact the Air

Resources Board:

Waxman 1/17

Thank you for responding to one of my earlier emails to you regarding

the appearance of suspicious contrails over the Los Angeles area. After
not hearing from you in over a month I sent a couple of more somewhat
pointed emails. If you have received them, I hope you take no offense.
I am extremely frustrated with elected officials in terms of getting a
response to this complaint at this point.

In your reply, you suggested that I contact airport authorities, etc. I

apparently did not make it clear that these contrails can in NO WAY be
confused with normal air traffic. The source lies elsewhere, and is of
such a scope that I’m sure even if you knew the real reason, you would
still be powerless to do anything about it.

I’m sure, even though you can’t admit it, it’s obvious to you like it is
to everyone else that something is being sprayed on everyone in every
major population area of this country. I re-iterate: if you would like
photographic evidence, I have photos from almost every day since early
December. If you saw the photos you would be convinced, but I have the
feeling that you already are.

Thanks for your time.

Rick Moors

—————————————————————-

54
 Apr
A CITIZEN'S CHRONICLE OF INQUIRIES

Letter to the New Scientist (No Response)

Has anyone there done any tests or studies on the stuff that is raining
down on every population center in the U.S? I am referring to a
systematic campaign involving huge numbers of high flying non-commercial
jet aircraft which leave enormous contrails which expand into clouds,
and slowly descend. When this happens, you will notice a salty,
metallic or even soapy taste in the mouth, usually followed by
respiratory problems.

I know by now you are aware of this crisis, as I’m sure it’s happening
in your city as well. My question to you is, how can we protect
ourselves from this assault. Can you somehow test this stuff after it
drifts down, or can you collect it from a plane? This is not a joke,
nor am I a conspiracy nut. This is a MAJOR HEALTH CRISIS OF CRIMINAL
MAGNATUDE!!!

Please do what you can to help. No media will touch this story.

Please see attached “before and after” photos shot in Santa Monica on
1/7. The first was shot at 7:00 A.M., the second one at 9:00 A.M. At
6:00 A.M., the sky was blue.

Thanks for your help in advance.

Rick Moors

—————————————————————

kabc tv 7 letter 2/00 (N0 Response)

Several weeks ago I emailed you what I thought were rather convincing
photos of a systematic spraying campaign by unidentified aircraft over
the Los Angeles area. Since I have not heard back from you I assume
that you are not interested in investigating this story. I would like
to request that you delete my photos from your files.

I am not surprised that you have neither the courage nor the
journalistic integrity to pursue this lead. What does surprise me is
that this is not a tough nut to crack. JUST LOOK UP!!! How much
“journalistic” training do you have to have to simply observe what has
been happening in our skies over the last month and a half?

I find it ironic that the true journalistic “heroes” of today are the
Larry Flints and the National Enquirers. They will be my next stop – at
least they’ll give me a hearing. Best of luck on your next freeway
chase or celeb scandal stories. Oh, and I’d keep my kids and pets
inside where it’s less likely they’ll get sick from this “non-event.”

Sincerely,

55
 Apr
A CITIZEN'S CHRONICLE OF INQUIRIES

Rick Moors
—————————————————————–

Mary Bono Email 2/24/00 (No Response)

It seems whenever I visit Palm Springs lately the beautiful blue sky I
used to remember is always obscured by what appears to be very unnatural
jet trails. Is there some type of missile testing in the desert going
on? Every time I come to visit, it seems to get worse. I’m about ready
to scratch Palm Springs off my vacation list.

Can you explain what this is and why aren’t you trying to stop it? It
can’t be very good for tourism.

Thanks,

Rick Moors

KABC TV7 letter 4/12/00

How could you guys have failed to publicize this great event in
advance? I’m talking about the great Air Show that was held in Santa
Monica on Sunday, April 9th. (see attached photos). There was some
amazing stunt flying and as you can see, a lot of skywriting.
Unfortunately, the skywriters must have been dyslexic or illiterate, as
it was hard to make out the writing. All in all however, a great show.
You guys are usually on top of these kinds of stories – I’m sure if you
had publicized it there would have been a wider audience.

Oh, you missed another great story also. I’m talking about the
quadruple missile launch from Vandenberg AFB last night, 4/10 (see last
photo). You all are really slipping.

Rick Moors
—————————————————————–

Dianne Feinstein 5/2/00

Dear Dianne,

Just wanted to mention what a wonderful job you are doing in making the
world safe from arch-villains such as the bloodthirsty and treacherous
Wen Ho Lee. I for one will sleep better knowing he is firmly shackled
in solitary confinement.

Just one small criticism however. I notice that in your zeal to fall all
over yourself appearing to be “patriotic” that you have overlooked an
even more insidious plot. I’m talking about the relentless spraying of
an unknown noxious substance on every populated area in the U.S. since
last December. Thousands of people like myself have tons of photos and

56
 Apr
A CITIZEN'S CHRONICLE OF INQUIRIES

water samples, etc. to back this up. But guess what? With the
exception of Sen. Udall from New Mexico, who is calling for hearings, no
other politicians have responded. I guess when the bad guy is Uncle Sam
and not some bogus paper tiger, you get out of the kitchen pretty
pronto. I’ve attached a couple more photos of what is now an every day
occurance here in Los Angeles. Call me a nut, but I consider myself a
citizen. And I consider you a coward.

Your cowardice and inaction are being documented on the following

websites. Give them a visit some time. I think the combined hits on
these sights is over a million a week.

http://www.carnicom.com/contrails.htm
http://clubs.yahoo.com/clubs/chemtrailtrackingusa
http://clubs.yahoo.com/clubs/ricksgardeningtips
http://www.sightings.com

Sincerely,

Rick Moors

__________________________________________________________________
Boxer 3/1/00

Dear Ms. Boxer,

Snapped these photos yesterday between rainstorms. These shots are

typical of any given day in Santa Monica the last two months. What the
hell is going on and why are you so cowardly as to ignore this issue?
I’m a former supporter, and not only will I never vote for you again, I
will actively campaign for the first “public servant” who addresses this
issue (and something tells me that ain’t you).

By the way, the chemical spraying in these photos can easily be seen
with binoculars. The planes involved in laying these particular trails
on 2/26 in Santa Monica were: KC 135’s painted all white w/ no markings,
727 2 engine type jets, white with orange under-fusleage, no markings,
and at least one small white military trainer type aircraft, w/ no wing
mounted engines visible. All were leaving huge contrails, while other
normal jet traffic, apparently at a higher altitude were leaving no
trails.

Obviously you are aware of this activity. I have utter comtempt for
your cowardice. You and other hypocrites like you make me ashamed to be
a member of the same species. No matter what you have been told about
this, your obligation is to serve the people you represent. AND THAT
MEANS KEEPING US INFORMED!!!! You have failed miserably in this basic
task. Two months ago I was a liberal Democrat and an ardent supporter.
Now I’m just sorry I ever believed in you and want you to go away.

57
 Apr
A CITIZEN'S CHRONICLE OF INQUIRIES

Sincerely,

Rick Moors

__________________________________________________________________

Doris Lo EPA office 9 Complaint 4/10/00

Dear Doris,

I’d like you to see this activity I photographed in Santa Monica two
days ago. Previous to this day, there were 5 days of clear skies with
NO JET TRAILS whatsoever. The weather on the day I took the photos was
identical to the previous 5 days, clear and warm. Since you maintain
that every previous photo I have sent you represents “normal” jet
trails, there can only be two explanations for the huge contrails in the
photos you are looking at:

1. There was NO air traffic whatsoever in the Los Angeles area during
the 5 days prior to the photographs being taken; Or,

2. Los Angeles was mistakenly targeted by a massive fleet of skywriters

who became lost on the way to an air show.

You must be very proud of the work you’re doing, “protecting” the
environment and all. Here’s hoping we can all survive your
“protection.”

Rick Moors

P.S. Oh, by the way, here’s a guy in Orange County who coincidentally
took lots of the same pictures down there on the SAME DAY I took mine in
Santa Monica. Those wayward skywriters sure get around

http://www.no-fi.com/chemtrail000409/index.html

P.S. As usual, I’ll be posting your replies (or lack therof) on numerous
large websites where concerned Americans like myself are demanding
accountability from our elected officials and government agencies.
__________________________________________________________________

Doris Lo 4/12 in response to my above complaint:

Mr. Moors:

I have reviewed some of the many internet websites associated with

contrails/chemtrails. As you know, this issue has been around for awhile
and has been raised to several high level elected and government
officials. I will try contacting some Department of Defense personnel
and will let you know if I find any useful information.

58
 Apr
A CITIZEN'S CHRONICLE OF INQUIRIES

I am not someone at EPA who is able to initiate an EPA investigation of

military flight operations. I will forward your concerns about
potential military flight operations which may be violating EPA rules or
endangering the health of the citizens to EPA Headquarters staff. They
should get back with you directly if they have any comments.

I am sorry I’m not able to help you any more.

__________________________________________________________________

My response to Doris Lo @ EPA office 9 4/14/00

Dear Doris,

Every time I receive one of your courteous replies to my sarcastic

letters I feel guilty. I believe you may be sincere and really want to
help get to the bottom of this, but if you are expecting any
co-operation from the DOD you are dreaming. This is a classic case of
the fox (The military) being put in charge of the chickens (that would
be you and I).

I may be fatalistic, but I believe neither you nor anyone at the EPA can
do anything to change this situation. Whatever they are trying to do,
it appears that they have gotten away with it. It’s a shame to see that
health of our kids, old people and those with compromised immune systems
jeopardized in this fashion. Know this for a fact: These are not normal
jet trails, and they are making many people sick. This is behavior I
would have expected from Nazi Germany, but never in America.

There are thousands if not millions of us now who are aware of this
crime (yes, that’s the right word). If someone from the EPA were to
contact the news media regarding these complaints to you it would be a
good start.

Thanks again Doris, and I didn’t mean to come off like a jerk. I’m just
very frustrated with this whole situation.

Rick Moors

Posted June 30 2000:

——————————————————————–

CITIZEN’S CHRONICLE UPDATE (In which Bill Kelly of the AQMD flawlessly
executes the famous “AQMD to EPA handoff play.”)
———————————————————————
TO: Air Quality Management District

Dear Sirs,

59
 Apr
A CITIZEN'S CHRONICLE OF INQUIRIES

I would like to submit a formal complaint about unidentified jet

aircraft spraying an unknown toxic substance over the Los Angeles area
for the past 3 months. This would definitely be a violation of AQMD
rule 402 (listed below, for your information). These jets leave trails
which are not normal. Instead of fading away like most jet trails, these
expand and form clouds, sometimes covering the entire sky. I have seen
and photographed as many as 12 jets at a time systematically laying down
patterns over the Los Angeles area (See attached photos).

I do not want to hear a standard lecture on how jet contrails are

formed. I know how they are formed, and they have nothing to do with
the activity I am reporting. I want to know what action you are going
to take to halt this threat to our health, not to mention the
desecration of what little is left of our clear skies.

Until you demonstrate that you have the courage to take action against
this crime, I suggest you refer to yourselves as “The Air District”,
since the terms “Quality” and “Management” don’t really apply.

Rick Moors

Adopted May 7, 1976)

RULE 402. NUISANCE

A person shall not discharge from any source whatsoever such quantities
of air contaminants or other material which cause injury, detriment,
nuisance, or annoyance to any considerable number of persons or to the
public, or which endanger the comfort, repose, health or safety of any
such persons or the public, or which cause, or have a natural tendency
to cause, injury or damage to
business or property.

The provisions of this rule shall not apply to odors emanating from
agricultural operations necessary for the growing of crops or the
raising of fowl or animals.

cc/ Barbara Boxer

Dianne Feinstein
Los Angeles Times
Office of the State Attorney General
Doris Lo, EPA regional office 9
Mayor Richard Riordan

—————————————————————————

Subject:
RE: Formal complaint about bad air due to jet activity
Date:
Tue, 28 Mar 2000 09:39:41 -0800

60
 Apr
A CITIZEN'S CHRONICLE OF INQUIRIES

From:
Bill Kelly <BKelly@aqmd.gov>
To:
‘Rick Moors’ <rick@labridge.com>

Dear Mr. Moors:

Thank you for your complaint. AQMD has called for tighter emissions
standards for jets, however, it is up to the federal Environmental
Protection Agency to set those standards. My understanding is that EPA
is examining standards, though I do not know the status. I suggest you
contact the federal EPA, since AQMD does not have legal jurisdiction
over jets flying over the area. Thanks for your concern.

-Bill Kelly,

AQMD Web Editor

61
 Apr
ULTRAVIOLET LIGHT INVESTIGATIONS

ULTRAVIOLET LIGHT INVESTIGATIONS

Apr 17, 2000

ULTRAVIOLET LIGHT INVESTIGATIONS

Original Ground Sample Received Nov 1999. Shown under microscope, top lit stage 60x.
Described previously and as delivered certified mail to U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
Distinguishing characteristics : sub-micron in diameter, adhesive, elastic. Remains chemically
unidentified.

Original Ground Sample Received Nov 1999 under black light (UV) and microscope (60x). Level of
fluorescence is NOT especially notable with this material. Distinguishing characteristics are
adhesiveness, microscopic wave forms, and sub-micron diameter of individual fibers.

62
 Apr
ULTRAVIOLET LIGHT INVESTIGATIONS

A common synthetic fiber (type unidentified) photographed under the microscope with visible light at 60x.

The same synthetic fiber shown above under the microscope at 60x, illuminated with black light (UV).
Extreme fluorescence, but bears no similarities to earlier ground sample. Fiber diameter significantly
greater than 1 micron, and by all appearances one of thousands of similar fibers (i.e., lint) in this
residential environment.

63
 Apr
ULTRAVIOLET LIGHT INVESTIGATIONS

Another synthetic fiber with notable fluorescence under the black light. Microscopic photograph taken
with visible light at 60x.

The same synthetic fiber shown above under the microscope at 60x, illuminated with black light (UV).
Extreme fluorescence, but bears no similarities to earlier ground sample. Fiber diameter significantly
greater than 1 micron, and by all appearances one of thousands of similar fibers (i.e., lint) in this
residential environment.

In addition, several fibers which appear to be of cotton also exhibited marked fluorescence under the
black light. These were also examined under the microscope and also did not exhibit any of the unusual
characteristics of the ground sample referenced earlier.

Allowance is made for the fact that the material emitted from active aircraft could be highly variable.
Caution is advised in the meantime, however, of using UV fluorescence as an identifying characteristic.
More data must be made available to assist in the process of identification, such as microscopic
photographs. Also consider the presentation of chemical testing previously described in order to
make further comparisons of materials. Although hundreds to thousands of fluorescent fibers
under the black light (UV) have been identified locally under this preliminary investigation, none
of them have been found to be of an especially unique nature.

Additional data and feedback of the current investigations underway with UV light is most welcome.
Hopefully these can be accompanied with some level of microscopic and or chemical evaluations. Thank
you.

Clifford E Carnicom April 17 2000

64
 Apr
GEL FALLOUT REPORTS

GEL FALLOUT REPORTS

Apr 24, 2000

GEL FALLOUT REPORTS

65
Apr
GEL FALLOUT REPORTS

66
 Apr
GEL FALLOUT REPORTS

The following email description was received along with the photographs posted above. The
individual that has submitted this information prefers to remain anonymous:

On the afternoon of April 24, 2000, I received a phone call from a friend who stated that around 12 PM
while driving East on Highway 50 between Shingle Springs and Cameron Park CA, her windshield was
splattered with
a honey like substance. When she glanced in the rear view mirror, she noticed that the car behind her

67
 Apr
GEL FALLOUT REPORTS

had turned on their windshield wipers smearing the same material everywhere. I told her not to touch
anything until some
photographs could be obtained and to try to save a small sample of the material.

Later that afternoon she photographed the windshield ,and with a macro lense ,shot some close ups of
the honey like splatters. Turning a zip lock plastic bag inside out, a small amount was scraped off the
glass probably less than 1/8 of a teaspoon . The liquid was clear with the consistency of honey. I noticed
some fiberous material , but the most obvious was a brown glob in the liquid about 1/16th of an inch in
diameter. Looking at the photos, it was obvious that there were larger brown globs in other locations on
the windshield but they were not saved. The microphotographs were obtained by attaching a Nikon FM-2
to an Olympus stereo microscope.

Although the sample was photographed while still in the plastic bag, I got some decent photos of
the of the brown substance along with a sample of the fiberous material. I showed the photos to
a retired airline pilot and he assured me that nothing like this would ever come out of a
commercial airliner. Maby some hydraulic fluid but nothing like this. At the location where this
occured, There were no overpasses within a half mile , no trees
within a few hundred feet., just clear blue skies.
Posted by Clifford E Carnicom on behalf of the individual submitting the above information.
July 31 2000

Note: This information is being posted because an additional incident has occurred which
corroborates the appearance of the physical material described above. The first involves a a
similiar event in Albuquerque NM which was experienced and witnessed by myself on April 24
2000. Material of similiar form and color also hit the windshield of the car my wife and I were
driving on the freeway through Albuquerque on that day. The material was of a dark amber color
and of the same consistency described above. I did inspect the material visually after pulling off
to the side of the road, but sample tests were not conducted due to schedule limitations of that
particular trip. By all indications the samples from these two events appear identical in form and
description.

Clifford E Carnicom
July 31 2000

The following information has also been made available through a member of the message board
attached to www.carnicom.com on August 1 2000:

Mr.Carnicom I just wanted to let you know that approximately a month and a
half ago my husband and I were driving home and it seemed that it started to
rain..Only for a few moments,it was dark and we were not far from home..We
were not under trees or an overpass..The next morning when I went to my car
there were little raindrop type spots of some clear substance stuck all over
my windshield and car..It looked almost like the windshield picture you have
posted except smaller drops..I did not get any sample but it did have a honey
or clear glue like texture..Here in my area North Carolina we have witnessed
a lot of the fallout the angel hair type and also the fluffy white fallout
that I and several witnesses watched fall from very high altitudes..You can
still see the spots on my car where this stuff had stuck to it…I just
wanted to add this to your report….(msswv)

68
 Apr
SATELLITE IMAGE; WEST COAST, US April, 2000

SATELLITE IMAGE; WEST COAST, US April, 2000

Apr 26, 2000

SATELLITE IMAGE;
WEST COAST, US
April, 2000

(Satellite image above submitted by observant users of the message board)

AND

The Jetstream for the Same Period:

69
 Apr
SATELLITE IMAGE; WEST COAST, US April, 2000

Comments noted by a user of the message board that made the jetstream information above
available:

“Talk about a “back door ” delivery. Due to a dominant high pressure cell, this material is being swept
NE to hit the coastal BS/Washington area and follows clockwise flow back into California. Very
systematically done.”

APRIL 26 2000
OREGON

70
 Apr
SATELLITE IMAGE; WEST COAST, US April, 2000

The above image was forwarded to www.carnicom.com by an astute observer. This satellite photograph
shows extensive and systematic grid spraying activity over the state of Oregon on April 26 2000.

71
 Apr
REPRESENTATIVE MIKE THOMPSON, CA ALL IS 'NORMAL'

REPRESENTATIVE MIKE THOMPSON, CA ALL IS 'NORMAL'

Apr 26, 2000

REPRESENTATIVE MIKE THOMPSON, CA

ALL IS ‘NORMAL’
The following letter was recently received by a California citizen:

72
Apr
REPRESENTATIVE MIKE THOMPSON, CA ALL IS 'NORMAL'

73
 Apr
RADAR & SATELLITE IMAGES; DISPARITY BETWEEN SATELLITE AND RADAR IMAGES

RADAR & SATELLITE IMAGES; DISPARITY BETWEEN SATELLITE AND RADAR

IMAGES
Apr 29, 2000

RADAR & SATELLITE IMAGES;

DISPARITY BETWEEN SATELLITE AND RADAR IMAGES
The following images were collected from earthwatch.com and weathertap.com on 04/29/00 at
0200. There is a marked disparity between the satellite imagery and radar formations as can be
seen between these images. These events were revealed by observant users of the message
board attached to www.carnicom.com, and their research is appreciated. The top image is
animated so please allow some time for this dramatic display to load into your browser.

74
Apr
RADAR & SATELLITE IMAGES; DISPARITY BETWEEN SATELLITE AND RADAR IMAGES

75
 May
POISONED SPRINGTIME

May
POISONED SPRINGTIME
May 8, 2000

Poisoned Springtime: What Will You Do?

by
Diane Harvey

Not everyone lives and works hidden away inside buildings, wholly apart from nature, even now. There
are those of us, here and there, for whom the reality of daily life is deeply bound up in the natural world
and the quiet powerful dynamos of the seasons. I, for one, have always spent as much time as possible
under a tree, on a beach, or in a garden. I have lived in and with and from the heart of the natural world.
As an artist, I paint the sky, letting my mind’s eye roam the pure healing blue of the light of day, and the
mysterious night’s stupendous starry infinity. As a gardener, I dip my hands in the equally sacred soil,
planting food for the body’s nourishment, and the beautiful flowers whose perfume nourishes the angels.
And springtime has always meant the bouyant uprising, simultaneously, of all the inner and outer
energies of physical and spiritual renewal. Springtime: the time of the year when the essence of
freshness and regeneration rises in our hearts, in the earth itself, and in the sweet blue sky at dawn.

This year is different. There is no ineffable joy in the dawn of a perfect spring day. There is no
pleasure in sowing the seeds of the future crops. There is no happiness in my life’s work of
contemplating the beauty of the skies. There is only grief, indignation, debilitation and
exhaustion. In short, this is another poisonous Chemtrail Spring. We wake here as usual in
central Arizona to noxious grey haze, settling down like death over the outer veneer of
burgeoning springtime. Instead of morning dew flavoring the air, there is a toxic metallic taste on
the tongue. Above the slick frankenfog, the soldiers of the New Roman Legions go back and
forth in the sky, sowing salt in the fields of heaven. And then? If we do not cower inside our
houses, we enter the great outdoors, and breathe the insult of slow death for inceasingly
overworked immune systems. And who on earth has the right to rob us of this sacred ground we
stand on, to destroy the marvellous working of the bodies we inhabit, and to spew chemical
venom into the very air we must breathe? Where are our lives in all this? Mine is here now,
reduced to writing from quiet fury: and what then? Are we to acccept being forced to live out our
lives in electronic corners, wondering about who is destroying our very existence, and why?

And does it really matter so much why so many of us are obliged to dwell in virtual chemical
dumps? Personally, I no longer care what the evil hare-brained “reasoning” is behind all this. Are
so many of us are merely acceptable numbers of damaged goods in a vast experiment to patch
the ozone holes? Or are the criminally insane frankenfolk we allow to run our lives deliberately
toying with second degree murder and genocide? Are the heartless, mindless, soulless
scientists playing with their weather modification games? Is the answer “none of the above”,
“some of the above, or “all of the above”? I don’t care anymore. The point of all this to me is that
we, collectively, are allowing these blantant “secret” experiments to have their nasty way with
us. We can look around and see how few human beings, in full possession of their wits,
unhypnotized by the wholesale dark paradigm, are left standing in the here and now. And those
of us who retain sufficient consciousness to see what is in front of our faces, being shoved down
our increasingly inflamed throats, are forcing the issue, demanding to know, writing the endless
letters, enduring the ridicule, and in general devoting ourselves to giving these monstrous
inhuman secret cartels as hard a time as we possibly can. And then?

76
 May
POISONED SPRINGTIME

The gist of all our lives is simple enough: there is a war being waged for the soul of humanity.
This war is everywhere, in everything. It is in the water, the air, the earth, the food, the structures
of our marketplaces, cultural activities, and in our forms of government. On one side of this
battle is the soul of humanity, and on the other side: the corporate-financial-military-industrial-go
vernmental-medical-pharmaceutical-agricultural-educational-religious-scientific-entertainment
complex. (Did I leave anything out? No matter.You know who they are.) And at the very core of
this dark mess is The Rule by Secrecy versus the Ideal of Democracy. As a whole, humanity is
clearly on the brink of complete enslavement, and is going along willingly, blindly into the dark it
cannot see. Humans are at present, as a whole, acting like the three monkeys of sheer denial:
seeing no evil, hearing no evil, and speaking no evil. All very well, except that at the same time,
the monkeys are chained, hypnotized, gassed, enfeebled, dumbed down, and devoured where
they sit. But after all, the stock market is still ballooning nicely, we can all go shopping, and
there’s something wonderfully stupifying on the tube tonight, so all feels perfectly comfy to most
of us.

So then here we all are. The soul of humanity, our free will, is quietly being chewed to the nub as
we watch. What will we do about this, those of us who have eyes to see? Shall we just sit quietly
in front of our monitors until the chemical and electromagnetic manipulation of the human mind
is perfected, and all our troubled thoughts and feelings will suddenly be over? Is it so far-fetched,
given what we factually know already about this technology, to contemplate waking up one
morning in a state of total acquiescence in things as they are? Shall we just wait patiently until
there is nothing left between our ears capable of registering all this interlocking darkness? I
don’t think so. I think we will fight to the last raspy breath in our bodies, in every way we
possibly can. Especially, we will fight lies by stating the truth as often as we can, in whatever
venue our efforts can find a place. This war is best fought at present on mental levels, in the
“sky” of our minds. We are fighting first of all for the conscious attention of our fellow human
beings. Just as chemtrails are being laid out behind a veil of secrecy in the physical sky, we will
lay out the counter-trails of reality and truth openly,on the internet and everywhere else we can
find a hearing, in the minds of as many people as we can find to listen.

All of us who care about what is happening to humanity see it from our own small point of view,
and we differ, sometimes radically, in our particular personal collection of thoughts and ideas
about all this. We differ in temperament, background, education, talents, limitations,
predispositions, and in every other way that expresses our unique individualities. For this
reason, it isn’t possible for those of us engaged in this great war to equally like, understand, and
agree with all those fighting on our own side- let alone being able to have compassion and
understanding for all our fellow beings trapped in the dark paradigm. But we can try to remember
the larger picture: this vast global multidimensional landscape in which we are all equally living,
suffering and striving for what we believe in. We can fight to the death, if need by, without the
virulent poison of hatred in our hearts, and without the spiritual childishness of separatism in our
minds. In the end, if humanity survives spiritually and materially, in some far-off time there will be
no “us” and “them”: we will know ourselves to be one humanity. In the meantime, we have no
choice but to wage an interspecies war toward that very end. The truth is, we are fighting for
everyone, and for every child born in the future. If we don’t fight, no one will. There is no one
else here. There is no one else to care about the soul of human beings except…you and me.

Diane Harvey
merak@sedona.net
May 8 2000

77
 May
UNUSUAL TRUCK ACTIVITY

UNUSUAL TRUCK ACTIVITY

May 8, 2000

UNUSUAL TRUCK ACTIVITY

The following information was reported recently on the message board attached to www.carnicom.com:

Photograph of the truck referred to in the message board post

Following Message Posted May 8 2000:

An interesting event happened last Friday

(5/8/000 on a trip down Northern California’s main
highway (I-5). Somewhere around Yreka,
California, I was passed several times by a tanker
truck as we went up and down the mountain
grades. This truck did not display any DOT
placards giving the code of its contents (such as
the 1206 = gasoline). It was obviously a chemical
hauler and obviously was carring a load. As I
pulled into the Weed, California, rest area this
truck pulled in next to my rig. The cylindrical silver
stainless steel had an expanded metal walkway
running the full length of the top of the tank,some
type of gauge on its left side, a conical rear
section and was dripping yellow-amber-brown
sticky-looking fluid from the top vents down the
sides of the tank. This is the same fluid
appearance of the stuff that hit my windshield
last June 10th, and burned my exposed skin, and
caused sun coronas, so I didn’t touch or sample

78
 May
UNUSUAL TRUCK ACTIVITY

this fluid and returned to the road. The tanker and

I continued to pass each other on down the
highway and as we drew up to the Northern
California Highway Patrol Truck Inspection Station
at Dunsmuir, California. I expected to lose my road
companion as “ALL TRUCKS MUST STOP FOR
INSPECTION” and all trucks were pulling in, except
this tanker! This was in broad daylight, there are
three sets of truck monitoring equipment;
cameras, radars, and height infra-red lights just
prior to this station, and the station never closes
as it is the northern portal of entry to California.
This tanker slowed down to 50 mph on the
highway, the driver looked directly at the station
office and cruised by all the trucks in line. I laid on
the horn for one half mile as this went down, so
the truckers waiting in line could see this. Again,
there was no bypass signal on and trucks in front
of, and behind this tanker, pulled into the station.

Now this truck had my full attention, and as I

passed I photographed it and got its numbers.

Tractor unit = dark blue Ray Booth, Cottonwood,

California
Tank unit = Trimac Western, McMinnville, Oregon?
Tank unit’s licence plate = Tennessee Apportioned
#006 197 T
Tank serial number = 481016 “Non-SPEC”

As I was getting this truck’s numbers, I got

tagged by a very dark blue new Chevy Caprice
with an anti-sway bar under the rear axle and a
man in his late 30’s early 40’s with blond hair and
a stone glare and wrap around sunglasses.
Although we were now in a 70 mph zone around
Redding, California, this car paced me at 75, 45,
35, 55, 35, 75, etc. etc. etc. for about 20 miles
until I forced it to either crash into me or get in
front of me. Then I paced him and made a very
abrupt exit and changed my course.

On my return trip Sunday I came around a bend at

Vollmers, California, on Highway I-5 to find a
similar tanker, Trimac Western, with a different
tractor and driver going north, broken down on
the side of the road. I stopped to assist the driver
and found he was hauling “paint” (the sky?). He
also had no DOT placards, also had Tennessee
Apportioned plates, but his tank was freshly

79
 May
UNUSUAL TRUCK ACTIVITY

washed and not dripping goo.

www.dsiti.com/

“Trimac is the fifth largest tank company in the

United States, with a system of tanks, ships, tank
farms, rail car tanks, highway tankers and
terminals serving the chemical industry. Trimac is
owned by Rentokil Initial of the UK which employs
140,000 people in over 40 countries.They haul
pesticides and chemicals for BASF,DuPONT,BAYER,
and all the other big chemmies.

No Department of Transportation placards.

No stopping for California Highway Patrol

inspection that all trucks must stop for.

And escorted by spooks?

The following additional information has been received by email on Jan 16 2001:
(The name of the submitting party will be withheld unless permission for posting is granted)

“Regarding your page:

http://www.carnicom.com/truck1.htm

The Dunsmuir I5 scales had prepass installed in late 1994.

http://www.prepass.com/what_is.html

This is now very common. It allows trucks to be weighed electronically without stopping.”

80
 May
BIOLOGICAL COMPONENTS IDENTIFIED

BIOLOGICAL COMPONENTS IDENTIFIED

May 11, 2000

BIOLOGICAL COMPONENTS IDENTIFIED

copyright 2000 by Clifford E Carnicom

Biological components have now been identified in the two ground samples previously analyzed
on www.carnicom.com. Numerous red blood cells, white blood cells, and unidentified cell types
have been found within the sub-micron fiber sample previously presented and submitted on Jan
20 2000 to Carol M. Browner, Administrator of the United States Environmental Protection
Agency. To date, Ms. Browner has refused to identify the sample delivered to her by certified
mail, and to disclose those results to the American public. A visual analysis has now been
conducted with a professional quality microscope on May 7 2000 that reveals the important
discovery above. More information and images from this analysis will be presented in the future.
Depicted above is one of two remarkable discoveries of clustered red blood cells which become
readily visible after being subjected to immersion oil. The cells appear to be of a freeze-dried or
dessicated nature in their original form within the microscopic fibers. Isolated and individual
blood cells are interspersed throughout both of the samples which have previously been
described. The surface of the cells appear to be modified in some way, but electron microscopy
will likely be required to establish further detail. Professional medical analysis of the images and
chemical analysis of the fibers, and the subsequent disclosure of those results, now exists as a
fundamental need.

The individual that provided the images herein and those that will follow shall remain anonymous. I was
a witness to the events that have been recorded. The source material for the images presented herein
has been duplicated and distributed to numerous locations across the United States, and it is secured by
various methods.

The ramifications of this recent discovery establish sufficient cause for widespread involvement of the
American people in this issue, and for subsequent criminal investigations and Congressional hearings.

81
 May
BIOLOGICAL COMPONENTS IDENTIFIED

Clifford E Carnicom
May 11 2000

ADDITIONAL MICROPHOTOGRAPHS OF
BIOLOGICAL COMPONENTS IDENTIFIED
Posted May 15 2000

Red Blood Cells Identified in Ground Samples

BROADCAST DISSEMINATION OF TRACE QUANTITIES

OF BIOLOGICALLY ACTIVE CHEMICALS : PATENT

PHARMACEUTICAL COMPOSITIONS
CONTAINING HOLLOW FINE TUBULAR
DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEMS

ADDITIONAL MICROPHOTOGRAPHS OF
BIOLOGICAL AND UNIDENTIFIED COMPONENTS FROM
MAY 7 2000 VIDEO SESSION
Posted June26 2000

82
 May
BIOLOGICAL COMPONENTS IDENTIFIED

Several of the objects within the video stills from the microscopic session posted within this series
remain unidentified. These include the double cells, as well as the blue and green materials shown
above. The object in the upper left of this series has been tentatively identified as a white blood cell.
Repeated observations of each cell type or object shown here occurred and were recorded within the
microscopic video session.

RECENT POST FROM THE SOURCE ON THE MESSAGE BOARD:

MAY 25 2000

Cell Antigen Fixative

83
 May
BIOLOGICAL COMPONENTS IDENTIFIED

I did some digging about the web and found that there are several preparations
that are used to “fix” cells so that thier antigenic structure stays intact. The
antigenic sites or structures on the surface of a cell are the parts of the cell or
micro organism ( infection) our immune system codes to. One particular fixative
is known as Bouins Fix. It’s ingredients are as follows:

2% picric acid – an explosive!

Glacial Acetic Acid

o
37 Formaldehyde

Such chemicals are fairly typical of antigen fixative preparations and are quite
toxic to say the least.

This may account for why some people have reported being burned when
handling some of the material that has been sprayed on us. It would also
account for the sterility of the samples that were recently microscopically
examined. This is a good place to start an analysis if someone so desired.

338glo

RECENT CORRESPONDENCE ON THE MESSAGE BOARD:

MAY 13 2000

Blood Sample Photomicrograph Questioned

Dear Mr. Carnicom:

I read. your post two days ago, and I have some

serious concerns about its validity (not its veracity – I
know that you are an honest man). I believe your
interpretation of the photomicrograph in question is
inaccurate. Your post’s excerpts in “quotes”, my
comments in[brackets].

“Biological components have now been identified in the

two ground samples previously analyzed on
www.carnicom.com.”

[The fact that the subjects evaluated are “ground

samples” sends up a red flag. “Ground samples” could
be samples that are not from aircraft, or, if they are,
could be contaminated by foreign matter. Note that I
am not saying they AREN’T from aircraft or ARE
contaminated, but that they COULD be. In other
words, they were not collected “in situ”, that is,
collected in the air from the contrail itself.]

“An [sic] visual analysis has now been conducted with

84
 May
BIOLOGICAL COMPONENTS IDENTIFIED

a professional quality microscope on May 7 2000….”

[I am not sure what kind of professional microscope

was used, but it appears to me that, based on the
apparent size of the erythrocytes (red blood cells) that
the photomicrograph was taken at between 900X and
1200X. This is borne out by your later statement
“readily visible after being subjected to immersion oil”.]

[However, another inconsistency here is that

immersion oil is not used to provide additional detail to
erythrocytes. Instead, it is used to maintain the same
refractive index between the subject matter and the
objective lens. At the extremely close gap between
objective and subject with a high-power oil immersion
lens, an air gap would cause severe diffraction
problems — thus distorting the view — even with an
fluorite or apochromatic lens.]

[To my experience (and I am not a professional

microscopist), there is nothing that will increase the
‘visibility’ of an erythrocyte. Safranin, methylene blue,
Gram’s, and Gentian Violet stains work wonders, but
only on leukocytes and leukoblasts (white blood cells)
— and I did not see any of them in that picture.]

[But there is a more serious problem. We know that

the microscope used was a optical and not an electron
microscope — else, there would be no mention of
immersion oil (an electron microscope works by
completely different principles). We also know that an
oil immersion lens has a focal length of less than 0.5
mm, which gives a depth-of-focus (or depth-of-field)
in the range of microns. This means that, at the
magnifications involved, you would have almost no
depth perception, and would not be able to maintain
focus past the depth of a single erythrocyte
thickness.]

[Yet we can see in the picture that there are several

layers of erythrocytes, and all are in focus! There is no
way I know of (with an optical microscope) to have
that depth of focus. Also, you can see from the
photomicrographed (especially if enhanced by a
program like Corel Photo-Print or Adobe Photoshop)
that there is no fall-off in the clarity and focus of the
objects.]

[Further, an examination of the photomicrograph, as

well as the shadows in the erythrocyte indentations,

85
 May
BIOLOGICAL COMPONENTS IDENTIFIED

shows that they appear to be top-lighted at an oblique

angle. This is patently impossible with an oil-immersion
lens — it is designed for a light source from either an
Abbe or dark-field substage condenser ONLY.]

[This leads me to believe that the photomicrograph

was made with a methodology that takes advantage of
a technology with which I am not familiar — or it is
faked.]

“The cells appear to be of a freeze-dried or dessicated

nature in their original form within the microscopic
fibers. Isolated and individual blood cells are
interspersed throughout both of the samples that have
previously been described. The surface of the cells
appear to be modified in some way, but electron
microscopy will likely be required to establish further
detail.”

[Based on my limited expertise, I will agree with the

above paragraph to an extent. The erythrocytes
certainly do not exhibit the isotonicity that cells in
fresh blood do, but that’s what happens when blood
dries anyway. I don’t see any evidence for either
freeze-drying or induced dessication, but, like Mr.
Carnicom says, “electron microscopy will likely be
required to establish further detail.”]

“Professional medical analysis of the images and

chemical analysis of the fibers, and the subsequent
disclosure of those results, now exists as a
fundamental need.”

[Absolutely! I have told you in previous

communications that the only thing that will take the
entire chemtrail/contrail business out of the realm of
conspiracy-mongering is for:

(1) Contrail residue to be collected while airborne and

tied to the contrails;

(2) A reputable laboratory to perform the analysis

under strict laboratory methodologies;

(3) The entire analysis, results, and corresponding

data to be published for both lay and peer review.

“The ramifications of this recent discovery establish

sufficient cause for widespread involvement of the
American people in this issue, and for subsequent

86
 May
BIOLOGICAL COMPONENTS IDENTIFIED

Congressional hearings.”

[I disagree. Until we have some serious evidence,

uncontaminated test material, a recognized laboratory
working from valid data, and full disclosure of any
reports (whether they agree with a chemtrail agenda
or not), there is NO sufficient cause for widespread
ANYTHING, and CERTAINLY not for us to spend more
money to send those Bozos in the Congress out on a
tail-chasing exercise.]

[If chemtrails are to be taken seriously, its proponents

must take them seriously themselves, and replace
hysteria, innuendo, gossip, and conspiracy with
evidence, data, and facts.]

“The individual that provided the images herein and

those that will follow shall remain anonymous.”

[That costs him his credibility.]

[Mr. Carnicom, I am one hundred percent convinced

that you are an honest person, but your trust of
people like this will only hurt your own credibility and
give the anti-conspiracy folk more ammunition that
chemtrail believers are all nuts (which I am sure is not
the case). I implore you, for the sake of these people
in this forum if no one else, to provide us with real
evidence if such is available.]

Regards,

Duncan Kunz / duncan.kunz@prodigy.net

A STATEMENT FROM THE SOURCE:

Blood Sample Photomicrograph Questioned

The microscope was a darkfield. The immersion oil was

used directly on the sample to reconstitute the dried
cells. No immersion oil was in a traditional sense except
under the slide to couple the slide to the condensor.
At first water was added to the sample for
observation, but all that showed was the fibers in situ.
The cells in the sample only reconstitute in certain
types of oil. A light machine oil similar to 3 in One oil
was tried with limited success. Also tried was WD 40,
(which was worthless ) and kerosene. The kerosene
did seem to reconstitute the cells, but quickly
bleached them of color. There is a rather sticky

87
 May
BIOLOGICAL COMPONENTS IDENTIFIED

adherent matrix that the fibers are encased in. This

includes the odd blue fiber.

Nearly all the videomicroscopy was done with no more

than a 40X dry objective. A 4X optical coupler is
connected to the video camera. There exists some
portions of the tape that shows individual blood cells
quite clearly. What cannot be seen clearly in the
capture is that this collection of cells is actually
arranged in nice rows. Further, these cells are not fully
reconstituted and are much smaller than their true
size.

There are not as many WBC’s in the sample , but they

certainly do exist. They do not reconstitute well , but
their appearance is unmistakable. Also present are a
least three other types of as yet unidentified cells.
Some with very clearly defined nuclei.

We tried to get a clear picture of the cells in that large

accumulation Clifford posted using the 100X objective,
but were unsuccessful. It was the lack of light passing
through the specimen that limited our ability and not
the actual depth of field. Above 40X, darkfield
objectives must either have a funnel stop or internal
iris. This cuts down on the light dramatically. There are
a few 100X examinations of the material on the video
tape that show individual cells with dramatic clarity.

In spite of the fact that this was collected from the

ground, and in one case off a car that had driven 1000
miles, the sample was sterile! No bacteria , mold or
fungus was found. There was of course some dirt, and
other contaminants in the sample along with some
spores. I do consider the spores to be contaminants
and not part of the original mix.

Two separate samples from different parts of the

United States, dropped on different days, were
examined. Both were identical. One of the samples had
considerably more blood cells, and cells of all types, in
it than the other.

FWIW – there is a method I’ve discovered to enhance

resolution and contrast in any microscope by at least
20 %. It has to do with preparation of the slide itself.
This method was used to prepare all the slides that
were examined.

I hope Clifford posts more captures off the tapes that

88
 May
BIOLOGICAL COMPONENTS IDENTIFIED

he has. Just let me say your jaw will drop when you
see some of what is in that material. My posting this
has more to do with revealing how the cells were
found, than answering your post. It is important that
confirmation can be made by others independent of
me.

[Editors Note: Additional Photographs

Posted May 15 2000;
more to follow]

I won’t get into all the physiologic possiblities that

inhaling blood, or other cells might produce. I’ll just say
for starters that let’s hope this is type “O” blood.

338glo

The following email and subsequent post on the message board was received on June 10
2000:

Hello.

I wish to make a comment on some of the areas discussed, especially

by a certain 338glo. Firstly, fixatives such as Bouins are not used to keep,
“antigenic structures intact.” Fixation causes cross linking of
macromolecules which arrests biological activity, at the same time
rendering the cells amenable to staining. It’s purpose is to
preserve cell ultrastructure to be stained and viewed by light
microscopy, usually by a pathologist, to help diagnos disease.
In other words, 338glo’s implications that your samples might provoke an
immune response is a grossly misleading exaggeration, not to mention
impossible. You will not initiate an immune response to anything that
has been fixed.
By the way:

1)picric acid- is a yellow crystalline substance that is explosive only

when dry and subject to a shock of some kind, such as a blow from a
hammer(not an electric shock). It’s used to precipitate
(separate from solution) proteins, and as a dye.
2)Glacial acetic acid-is just a highly(almost pure) form of acetic acid,
and highly reactive organic acid. %5 is good on your french fries,
99% will burn out all of your mucous membranes. This substance
is used in many laboratory tests.
3)Formaldehyde-another fixative that hardens tissue, and preserves it
for histological examination(staining).

Kunz’s comment about immersion oil is correct. If you want to

reconstitute the cells, try using isotonic saline(approx %0.95 salt in
water). No oil of any kind is going to help you there. You will not
see anything but large structural changes by light microscopy anyway.

89
 May
BIOLOGICAL COMPONENTS IDENTIFIED

You will not be able to judge anything about surface antigens, which, by
the way, were destroyed by the fixation process. That cluster of red
cells looks to be viewed at about x1000. There only appears to be one
fairly visible layer of red cells, if that’s what they are, and not all
of them are in focus. It is impossible to comment on the light source,
but you can view objects under a microscope with light comming from
another source other than the bulb/condenser. As long as it reflects
off the object viewed, travels up the objective to the eye piece, and is
bright enough to see, you will see it. It is also impossible to tell if
the cells(?) were freeze-dessicated or whatever. Cellular specimens can
be frozen, if done correctly, and have their structures preserved; this
statement is nonsense. Also, adding just water(a hypotonic solution)
to those cells won’t help you much either, and will only alter their
structure more if they are at all able to be reconstituted(unlikely).

It is mentioned later that the sample is sterile, BUT it contains

some spores. Do you know what spores are? They’re
a reproductive cell produced by plants and some protozoons. Certain
bacteria(ie: antrax bacilli) also form spores, but
for environmental protection, not reproduction. Another tidbit for
you-type “O” blood accounts for almost half the population,
and is compatible with the other major blood groups, A, B, and AB.
That’s why group “O” is called the universal donor, with
AB being the universal recipient. Inhaling dry blood might make you
cough, but otherwise will do nothing, let alone
initiate an immune response.

This type of fear mongering does nothing but stimulate unfound

paranoia. Please have people that know what they’re talking
about review samples of any significance, or you’ll never be received as
credible. There’s something going on here, and this type of nonsense
isn’t helping anyone find out what it is. I also doubt this sample came
from where you think it did. I hope this helps your readers.
Good luck with the research, and thank-you for
taking the time to read this. I’ve just worked all night, so please
excuse any typing errors. If anything I’ve said needs clarification,
just let me know. Again, thanks.

Shayne Dixie M.L.T.

(Medical Laboratory Technologist)
Brockville General Hospital
Brockville, Ontario Canada.
K6V 1S8
(in case you wonder where I’m coming from)

A STATEMENT FROM THE SOURCE:

Posted June 14 2000

On June 12, Shayner made a post and my first reply

was lost when I tried to post it. Hopefully this

90
 May
BIOLOGICAL COMPONENTS IDENTIFIED

individual message will post.

Bouins fix has many uses, please see the following

quotes from the listed web sites for it use as an agent
to fix antigen sites on cells.

www.emsdiasum.com/ems/his…ative.html
Bouin’s Solution
Bouin’s solution can be used as a fixation and a
staining fluid. Bouin’s
fixative is excellent for use on biopsy specimens of the
gastrointestinal
tract. Tissue from the endocrine system are well fixed
and many antibodies
react well with tissue fixed in Bouin’s.

www.cmbm.org/Conference98…s/205.html
Next one, please. We can detect the cancer cells by
immunocytochemistry
using the same type of antibodies. Here we have tumor
cells detected with
one of the antibodies. This was again the free beta
subunit. The way in
which this tissue is fixed for cytochemistry is different.
We don’t fix in
formalin. To have a result in immunocytochemistry,
when you’re dealing with
hCG, aldehydes kill glycolipids and carbohydrates, so
we have to use a
picric acid type of fixative, Bouin’s fixative

www.alzforum.org/members/…table.html

Immune system response occurs for many reasons, and

involves many different methods. The deciding factor
in initiating an immune response is that something
foreign has come into contact with the interior of the
body, or the external mucous membranes of the body.
This could be a piece of wood, dirt, metal, mold,
bacteria, viruses, pollen, chemicals, or cellular tissue
for example.

Many people have seasonal allergic responses to

pollens, grasses, molds, and so on. Some people have
inhallation type allergies that will initiate asthmatic
bronchospasms that can be life threatening. Some of
the recent postings regarding eye, throat, and lung
irritation following spraying are typical of an immune
system response. Foreign blood cells of the wrong type
will cause an immune system response. If the outer

91
 May
BIOLOGICAL COMPONENTS IDENTIFIED

membrane of the cell has been changed in some

manner this will cause an immune system response.

Foreign cellular tissue will cause a dramatic immune

system response. Transfuse the wrong blood type,
implant a new organ, and your immune system will
immediately go to work, clot the blood,and reject the
organ.

I mentioned Bouin’s fix as merely an example of a

known fixative agent that will preserve antigenic sites
on blood cells. The ingredients in the mixture are all
toxic, some are known carcinogens and one when dried
is explosive. This is a place to start analysis of the
material. Samples of this stringy , sticky material have
been collected by people across the US. There are
reports of physical contact causing people to become
ill and thier skin to be burned. Some of ingredients in
Bouin’s fix could easily cause such symptoms.
Here is the EPA haz mat paper on Bouin’s fix.

www.mastertechs.com/msds/…FXBOU2.TXT
C. FIRST AID (EMERGENCY PROCEDURES)

1. EYE CONTACT: Remove contact lenses if necessary,

and immediately flush
eyes with copious amounts of water. Buffered saline
eye wash
solution may also be used. Seek medical attention
immediately.

2. SKIN CONTACT: Immediately wash contaminated

area thoroughly with
mild soap and water. Remove contaminated clothing if
necessary.

3. INHALATION: Remove to fresh air. If symptoms

persist, seek medical
attention.

At the moment of course there is no proof that the

cells in the sample have been treated with any fixative
agent. Nor is there any proof that any of the
ingredients in Bouins fix are in the sample. This needs
to be determined. Mr. Carnicom spent over 400 dollars
of his own money having a government licensed lab
analyze some of the samples. The report he recieved
was essentially worthless. [Editors Note: Lab fees of
$450 were paid for the lab tests referenced, however,
I was not personally the source of those funds. CEC]

92
 May
BIOLOGICAL COMPONENTS IDENTIFIED

The reason immersion oil was used, is that the sticky

matrix that held the cells would not dissolve in water.
Water was useless to dissolve the matrix and allow the
cells to reconstitute. Immersion oil however worked
very well for this purpose.

My comments about the spores were only that due to

thier paucity, I felt that these were contaminents and
not native to the sample.

My posting was not to incite fear, it was to promote a

starting point to analyze what has been sprayed on
some parts of the US. The facts are that this material
has been seen and collected from different sites
around the US, and like it or not it does exist.

338glo

93
 May
UNUSUAL TRAIL

UNUSUAL TRAIL
May 12, 2000

UNUSUAL TRAIL
May 12 2000
Submitted from Magalia, CA

Photo taken Friday, May 12th at approx. 1945 hr., while going out to
gather firewood. I just looked up, a regular habit these days, and observed a
snake like pattern within the trail. I have no other words to describe this.
I was facing east as I stood outside the back deck. The trail points
north — south. The whole trail was NOT in the shape of a snake, just the
area I photographed. Points north and south of the snake appeared like the
normal progression of chemtrails. I estimate the trail to be about 15 – 20
minutes old when photo was taken and again NO sound of acft. The trail drifted
slowly to the East and the snake pattern disappeared within the rest of it’s
trail. The sky had a light haze, as spraying commenced in the early hours and
continued through the day.

The black line in the photo is just that! Our power line to the house.
Our tree tops on the left and right. I also have another photo where I
zoomed all the way in, targeting the snake pattern.

PHOTO INFO
Olympus Digital C-2500L 2.5 Mpixel Progressive CCD 3x zoom
Camera set to take SHQ /JPEG @ automatic exposure
Original image size: W 23.778? by H 19? 3.7MB
Resolution: 72
Pixel Dimension: W 1712 pix H 1368 pix

94
 May
UNUSUAL TRAIL

Nothing else was done to the photos.

Only size was changed to accommodate this e-mail.

Richard Malone,
Magalia, CA

95
 May
A MECHANIC'S STATEMENT

A MECHANIC'S STATEMENT
May 19, 2000

A MECHANIC’S STATEMENT
Posted by C.E. Carnicom on behalf of A Concerned Citizen
May 19 2000

For reasons you will understand as you read this I can not divulge my identity. I am an aircraft mechanic
for a major airline. I work at one of our maintenance bases located at a large airport. I have discovered
some information that I think you will find important.

First I should tell you something about the “pecking order” among mechanics. It is important to my story
and to the cause to which you have dedicated yourself.

Mechanics want to work on three things. The avionics, the engines, or the flight controls. The mechanics
that work on these systems are considered at the top of the “pecking order”. Next come the mechanics
that work on the hydraulics and air conditioning systems. Then come the ones who work on the galley
and other non-essential systems. But at the very bottom of the list are the mechanics that work on the
waste disposal systems. No mechanic wants to work on the pumps, tanks, and pipes that are used to
store the waste from the lavatories.

But at every airport where I have worked there are always 2 or 3 mechanics that volunteer to work on the
lavatory systems. The other mechanics are happy to let them do it. Because of this you will have only 2
or 3 mechanics that work on these systems at any one airport. No one pays much attention to these
guys and no mechanic socializes with another mechanic who only works on the waste systems. In fact I
had never thought much about this situation until last month.

Like most airlines we have reciprocal agreements with the other airlines that fly into this airport. If they
have a problem with a plane one of our mechanics will take care of it. Likewise if one of our planes has a
problem at an airport where the other airline has a maintenance base, they will fix our plane.

One day last month I was called out from our base to work on a plane for another airline. When I got the
call the dispatcher did not know what the problem was. When I got to the plane I found out that the
problem was in waste disposal system. There was nothing for me to do but to crawl in and fix the
problem. When I got into the bay I realized that something was not right. There were more tanks, pumps,
and pipes then should have been there. At first I assumed that the system had been changed. It had
been 10 years since I had worked on one. As I tried to find the problem I quickly realized the extra piping
and tanks were not connected to the waste disposal system. I had just discovered this when another
mechanic from my company showed up. It was one of the mechanics who usually works on these
systems. I happily turned the job over to him. As I was leaving I asked him about the extra equipment.
He told me to “worry about my end of the plane and let him worry about his!”

The next day I was on the company computer to look up a wiring schematic. While I was there I decided
to look up the extra equipment I had found. To my amazement the manuals did not show any of the extra
equipment I had seen with my own eyes the day before. I even tied in to the manufacturer files and still
found nothing. Now I was really determined to find out what that equipment did.

The next week we had three of our planes in our main hanger for periodic inspection. There are
mechanics crawling all over a plane during these inspections. I had just finished my shift and I decided to
have a look at the waste system on one of our planes. With all the mechanics around I figured that no

96
 May
A MECHANIC'S STATEMENT

one would notice an extra one on the plane. Sure enough, the plane I choose had the extra equipment!

I began to trace the system of pipes, pumps, and tanks. I found what appeared to be the control unit for
the system. It was a standard looking avionics control box but it had no markings of any kind. I could
trace the control wires from the box to the pumps and valves but there were no control circuits coming
into the unit. The only wires coming into the unit was a power connection to the aircraft’s main power
bus.

The system had 1 large and 2 smaller tanks. It was hard to tell in the cramped compartment but it looked
like the large tank could hold 50 gallons. The tanks were connected to a fill and drain valve that passed
through the fuselage just behind the drain valve for the waste system. When I had a chance to look for
this connection under the plane I found it cunningly hidden behind a panel under the panel used to
access the waste drain.

I began to trace the piping from the pumps. These pipes lead to a network of small pipes that ended in
the trailing edges of the wings and horizontal stabilizers. If you look closely at the wings of a large
airplane you will see a set of wires, about the size of your finger, extending from the trailing edge of the
wing surfaces. These are the static discharge wicks. They are used to dissipate the static electric charge
that builds up on a plane in flight. I discovered that the pipes from this mystery system lead to every 1
out of 3 of these static discharge
wicks. These wicks had been “hollowed out” to allow whatever flows through these pipes to be
discharged through these fake wicks.

It was while I was on the wing that one of the managers spotted me. He ordered me out of the hanger
telling me that my shift was over and I had not been authorized any overtime.

The next couple of days were very busy and I had no time to continue my investigation. Late one
afternoon, two days after my discovery, I was called to replace an engine temperature sensor on a plane
due to take off in two hours. I finished the job and turned in the paperwork.

About 30 minutes later I was paged to see the General Manager. When I went in his office I found that
our union rep and two others who I did not know were waiting on me. He told me that a serious problem
had been discovered. He said that I was being written up and suspended for turning in false paperwork.
He handed me a disciplinary form stating that I had turned in false paperwork on the engine temperature
sensor I had installed a few hours before. I was floored and began to protest. I told them that this was
ridiculous and that I had done this work. The union rep spoke up then and recommended that we take a
look at the plane and see if we could straighten it all out. It was at this time that I asked who the other
two men were. The GM told me that they were airline safety inspectors but would not give me their
name.

We proceeded to the plane, which should have been in the air but was parked on our maintenance
ramp. We opened the engine cowling and the union rep pulled the sensor. He checked the serial number
and told everyone that it was the old instrument. We then went to the parts bay and went back into the
racks. The union rep checked my report and pulled from the rack a sealed box. He opened the box and
pulled out the engine temperature sensor with the serial number of the one I had installed. I was told that
I was suspended for a week without pay and to leave immediately.

I sat at home the first day of my suspension wondering what the hell had happened to me. That evening
I received a phone call. The voice told me “Now you know what happens to mechanics who poke around
in things they shouldn’t. The next time you start working on systems that are no concern of yours you

97
 May
A MECHANIC'S STATEMENT

will lose your job! As it is I’m feeling generous, I believe that you’ll be able to go back to work soon”
CLICK. Again I had to pick myself from off the floor. I made the connection that what had happened was
directly connected to my tracing the mysterious piping. The next morning the General Manager called
me. He said that due to my past excellent
employment record that the suspension had been reduced to one day and that I should report back to
work immediately. The only thing I could think of was what are they trying to hide and who are THEY!

That day at work went by as if nothing had happened. None of the other mechanics mentioned the
suspension and my union rep told me not to talk about it. That night I logged onto the Internet to try to
find some answers. I don’t remember now how I got there but I came across your site. That’s when it all
came together. But the next morning at work I found a note inside my locked locker. It said, “Curiosity
killed the cat. Don’t be looking at Internet sites that are no concern of yours.”

Well that’s it. THEY are watching me.

Well you already know what they are doing. I don’t know what they are spraying but I can tell you how
they are doing it. I figure they are using the “honey trucks”. These are the trucks that empty the waste
from the lavatory waste tanks. The airports usually contract out this job and nobody goes near these
trucks. Who wants to stand next a truck full of sh–. While these guys are emptying the waste tanks they
are filling the tanks of the spray system. They know the planes flight path so they probably program the
control unit to start spraying some amount of time after the plane reaches a certain altitude. The spray
nozzles in the fake static wicks are so small that no one in the plane would see a thing.

God help us all,

A concerned citizen.

98
 May
AN AIRLINE MANAGER'S STATEMENT

AN AIRLINE MANAGER'S STATEMENT

May 22, 2000

AN AIRLINE MANAGER’S STATEMENT

Posted by C.E. Carnicom on behalf of the author
May 22 2000

Mr. Carnicom:

I read the email you received from the anonymous mechanic and felt
compelled to respond to it. I, too, work for an airline, though I work
in upper management levels. I will not say which airline, what city I
am located, nor what office I work for, for obvious reasons. I wish I
could document everything I am about to relate to you, but to do so is
next to impossible and would result in possible physical harm to me.

The email from the anonymous mechanic rings true. Airline companies in
America have been participating in something called Project Cloverleaf
for a few years now. The earliest date anyone remembers being briefed
on it is 1998. I was briefed on it in 1999. The few airline employees
who were briefed on Project Cloverleaf were all made to undergo
background checks, and before we were briefed on it we were made to sign
non-disclosure agreements, which basically state that if we tell anyone
what we know we could be imprisoned.

About twenty employees in our office were briefed along with my by two
officials from some government agency. They didn’t tell us which one.
They told us that the government was going to pay our airline, along
with others, to release special chemicals from commercial aircraft.
When asked what the chemicals were and why we were going to spray them,
they told us that information was given on a need-to-know basis and we
weren’t cleared for it. They then went on to state that the chemicals
were harmless, but the program was of such importance that it needed to
be done at all costs. When we asked them why didn’t they just rig
military aircraft to spray these chemicals, they stated that there
weren’t enough military aircraft available to release chemicals on such
a large basis as needs to be done. That’s why Project Cloverleaf was
initiated, to allow commercial airlines to assist in releasing these
chemicals into the atmosphere. Then someone asked why all the secrecy
was needed. The government reps then stated that if the general public
knew that the aircraft they were flying on were releasing chemicals into
the air, environmentalist groups would raise hell and demand the
spraying stop. Someone asked one of the G-men then if the chemicals are
harmless, why not tell the public what the chemicals are and why we are
spraying them? He seemed perturbed at this question and told us in a
tone of authority that the public doesn’t need to know what’s going on,
but that this program is in their best interests. He also stated that
we should not tell anyone, nor ask any more questions about it. With
that, the briefing was over.

99
 May
AN AIRLINE MANAGER'S STATEMENT

All documents in our office pertaining to Project Cloverleaf are kept in

locked safes. Nobody is allowed to take these documents out of the
office. Very few employees are allowed access to these documents, and
they remain tight-lipped about what the documents say.

Mr. Carnicom, I am no fool. I know there’s something going on. And

frankly, I am scared. I feel a high level of guilt that I have been
aware of this kind of operation but unable to tell anyone. It’s been
eating away at me, knowing that the company I work for may be poisoning
the American people. I hope this letter will open some eyes to what’s
happening.

Again, I wish I could give you documented information, but you have to
understand why I must remain totally anonymous.

Thank you.

100
 May
FBI CONTACTED

FBI CONTACTED
May 26, 2000

FBI CONTACTED

The United States Federal Bureau of Investigation has been contacted regarding certain actions
publicly committed or proclaimed against me, including impersonation, libel, hacking, and
threats against my livelihood. Additional information has been provided concerning recent
publicly proclaimed death threats against a separate individual.

Clifford E Carnicom
May 7 2000
May 19 2000
May 26 2000

Criminal Message Board Terminated

Message Posted on June 9 2000

Credit is given to the managerial staff of Looksmart, Ltd. (InsideTheWeb.com) for

their recent and prompt decision to terminate the existence of a message board
which has prompted the filing of criminal reports to the Federal Bureau of
Investigation.

This message board has fostered unchecked criminal activity including death
threats, publicly claimed hacking, impersonation, fraud and libel.

The public is encouraged to keep a watchful eye for any re-emergence of this
activity.

Clifford E Carnicom

Criminal Activity Continuing

Message Posted on www.carnicom.com June 13 2000

The following message has been posted by myself on

the Chemtrail Tracking Club Message Board as No.
24193 on June 13 2000. All participants of this board
are encouraged to continue to force truthful disclosure
on all accounts. Appreciation is extended to those
readers and users that have brought this matter to my
attention.

****************************

Please note that the criminal actions of libel, slander,

and impersonation are continuing. Newspaper
accounts recently encountered regarding me are
fictitious and they are the basis of criminal
complaints that I have filed recently with the FBI.
Such fictitious accounts are contributing grounds

101
 May
FBI CONTACTED

for the recent termination of a message board by

operated by LookSmart, Ltd. as described below.

Readers are encouraged to keep a watchful eye for all

such crimes that are being committed, to work
diligently to trace their source, to eliminate falsehoods,
and to file formal reports with the authorities
as is appropriate.

Clifford E Carnicom
June 13 2000

Acknowledgement :
Posted June 28 2000

A second message board that participated (possibly unknowingly) in the criminal actions of libel has
been terminated. Appreciation is extended to the owners of www.hostedscripts.com for their prompt
decision to terminate the board upon notification of the severity of the crimes. This brings to a total of
three those
message boards which have been managed decisively when confronted with clear evidence of extremist
libel and fraud.

Any notification of further criminal action against researchers or activists involved with the aerosol issue
is appreciated.

Sincerely,

Clifford E Carnicom

Acknowledgement :
Posted June 30 2000

Re: Criminal Activity Continuing

A fourth message board that has been the recipient of libelous and fraudulent information
against me has removed the material as well as the offending party. Appreciation is extended to
www.gulfwarvets.com for acting decisively and with integrity on this matter, and to the alert
participants of this message board that nullified the repeated attempt of defamation.

Clifford E Carnicom
June 30 2000

102
 May
RADAR IMAGE

RADAR IMAGE
May 30, 2000
RADAR IMAGE
MAY 30 2000
The following radar image was reported by email notification on 05/30/00. Please allow time for
the animated image to load into your browser, and notice the extraordinary ring structure in
southwestern Utah.

103
 Jun
EPA DEEMED NEGLIGENT

Jun
EPA DEEMED NEGLIGENT
Jun 9, 2000

EPA DEEMED NEGLIGENT

The following letter has been sent to Carol M. Browner,
Administrator of the United States Environmental Protection Agency
via certified mail. Receipt of this letter has been acknowledged by the office
of Carol M. Browner on June 9 2000.

104
Jun
EPA DEEMED NEGLIGENT

105
Jun
EPA DEEMED NEGLIGENT

106
 Jun
SYNTHETIC CLOUDS REVEALED

SYNTHETIC CLOUDS REVEALED

Jun 22, 2000

SYNTHETIC CLOUDS
REVEALED
Santa Fe NM June 22 2000

These photographs (video stills) taken on June 22 2000 reveal the synthetic nature of the cloud base
which developed over Santa Fe NM on that day. The first four photographs show the effects of a plane
which recently passed, or “cut through” the cloud layer which was in the process of formation at this
time. No direct spraying had been observed at this time, and these clouds rapidly entered into the Santa
Fe skies at the jet stream level. The first two photographs of the set of four are enhanced for brightness
and contrast. The material that constitutes these “clouds” has been pushed away, or evacuated, with
the passage of the aircraft. The aircraft itself left no trail whatsover, only the visible after effect of its
passage was noted and recorded. This particular aircraft shows the effect of the absence of mass after
passage, and it therefore provides us with a different perspective of the substances overhead. The
material of the “clouds” is shown to have density, form and behavior unbecoming of water vapor, and it
has all the appearances of being at least in part of a synthetic nature. This material and form of “cloud”
has been observed on numerous occasions in Santa Fe NM during the past year and a half of the
spraying program, and has always been suspect because of the unusual textures observed. The
patterns and textures referred to have frequently been described as “cottage cheese” or “tortoise shell”
in nature by some observers (a classical assumption would be alto-cumulus). This is the first case that I
am aware of that visibly demonstrates the disturbance of this material, and which reveals that it simply is
not water vapor under the conditions recorded.

As can be seen throughout the progression, this “cloud layer” would conventionally be described in
terms of cirro-stratus and alto-cumulus categories, and later can be seen to merge with cumulus
formations over the mountains of Santa Fe. The last photograph shows the progession during mid-day.

The material that is shown in the earlier part of this progression commonly leads to the circular
rings around the sun, as described earlier on this site and within the Real Media reports as
resulting from hexagonal crystals of uniform size. The “clouds” themselves can often be seen to
be colored at the edges from refractive effects of the material within, especially through polaroid
or sunglasses.

107
 Jun
SYNTHETIC CLOUDS REVEALED

The “clouds” that are frequently seen in combination with spray operations are not composed fully of
water vapor as may be commonly assumed. The photographs presented herein are further
demonstration of this fact.

A video segment of this session will be presented later if time permits. Professional meterological
comments on the message board are always welcome.

Clifford E Carnicom
June 27 2000

108
Jun
SYNTHETIC CLOUDS REVEALED

109
Jun
SYNTHETIC CLOUDS REVEALED

110
Jun
SYNTHETIC CLOUDS REVEALED

111
 Jun
SOUTH AFRICA FIBERS; NEWS REPORT CORROBORATES U.S. FINDINGS

SOUTH AFRICA FIBERS; NEWS REPORT CORROBORATES U.S. FINDINGS

Jun 26, 2000

SOUTH AFRICA NEWS REPORT

CORROBORATES U.S. FINDINGS
Received by email June 26 2000
Posted with Permission via the translator

Rapport Newspaper, South Africa, Cape Edition – 25/6/00

Strange, sticky, wiry threads similar to spider’s web falls in the Karoo.

By Maryna van Wyk

Are these sticky, spider web-like materials that are falling on to the Karoo areas from the air and
forming a blanket like appearance across the vegetation, telephone poles and barbed wire,
something falling out of space? Is this waste material falling from space? Or is this something
which has its origins in the aeroplanes that fly so frequently
over the area?

Karoo farmers in the district of De Aar are really puzzled about this. Some of them believe that
the Karoo is becoming the dumping ground for space debris. Some of the cattle in the area have
apparently also become ill after they ate some of the cotton-like fibres which are evident on some
of the feeding vegetation. These cotton-like
fibres look as if they come from the air because of the way they float down to the ground and
pollute the veldt and vegetation.

“The Karoo has never looked like this before,” say some of the farmers that have farmed in the
area for a number of years.

Mr. Koos du Toit from the farm Henopskraal has this past week shown to the Rapport newspaper
where the fine fibres of the sticky, cotton-like substance have become stuck to the bushes and
fences on his farm. Recent rain has washed away some of these fibres but he says he is
confident that the debris will again start falling to the ground from the air, as has been the case
for the past month.

The farmers and even one of the town inhabitants who has found fibres in his garden believe its
origins are from the aeroplanes which cross the area between Cape Town and Johannesburg on
a daily basis. It was mentioned that it could even be the chemicals which are used to dissolve the
human excrement and toilet paper in the aeroplanes. Or
it is even speculated as being some space debris with its origins from the satellites circling the
earth.

Du Toit says that these strange objects have fallen on to his farm for the second time recently.
Some of these fibres are up to two metres long and he found some hanging over the telephone
poles on his farm. When it is rubbed between the fingers the texture of the substance becomes
fragmented and even disappears. It appears to have no smell whatsoever.

“Two of my best cows have fallen ill this past month, ever since the debris started falling on to
my farm. These cows showed the symptoms of the illness by large bumps appearing on their

112
 Jun
SOUTH AFRICA FIBERS; NEWS REPORT CORROBORATES U.S. FINDINGS

hides, they became extremely listless and even became blind.”

These sticky, spider web-like fibres seem to be a threat to Mr.Du Toit’s Lucern lambs as his
Lucerns seem to be exposed to this fallout and the chances of their becoming poisoned with this
can lead to further illnesses amongst his animals and lead to monetary loss.

Mr. Petrus van Rooyen (48) is a farm worker for Mr.Du Toit who first noticed these strange sticky
fibres and he maintains that he saw bundles of these fibres falling out of an aeroplane crossing
above the area. After these fibres fell out of the aeroplane they spread over a wide area and
landed in the veldt. Now Mr. Van Rooyen maintains that even the children have been in contact
with these fibres and that these fibres make their hair sticky.

Some of these wiry fibres have also apparently fallen on the adjacent farm next to that of Mr.Du
Toit.

Mr.Willie Pool also found some of these fibres in the town in his garden.

A certain Mr. Coenie Muller was in his car when some of the debris landed on his car during
transit.

It is reported that a lot of these fibres have been washed away by the recent rain in the Karoo
area.

Rapport found a piece of this fibre on Thursday last week and sent it to Professor Derek Litthauer
who is the Head of the Department of Microbiology at the FreeState University for his information
and analysis. He humoured the situation by suggesting this may be a piece of Manna falling out
of the heavens.

“It looks as if these wires are synthetic but we will have to investigate and analyse before we can
comment any further.”

End of article.
Posted by C.E. Carnicom
with permission via the translator
July 6 2000

113
 Jun
INQUIRY : RAINWATER ANALYSIS

INQUIRY : RAINWATER ANALYSIS

Jun 27, 2000

INQUIRY :
RAINWATER ANALYSIS
Santa Fe NM June 27 2000

The following message has been posted by C.E. Carnicom on July 21 2000 on the message board:

Re: INQUIRY : RAINWATER ANALYSIS

Actually, this inquiry has been re-opened due to a recent anonymous message indicating that pine pollen
has been used as a vehicle for clandestine genetic engineering experiments. This message will be
posted within the web page
referenced below when it has been recovered.

The first task that exists will be to identify the pinyon pine and ponderosa pollen grains which are
dominant in the region of rainwater collection, and then to identify the specific species that is common
within the samples collected. Those with botanical and microscopy backgrounds are encouraged to
participate.

Clifford E Carnicom
July 21 2000

No identifying statements have been received since the posting of this inquiry on June 27 2000.
My research now indicates that the objects microphotographed are most likely pine pollen
grains. CSIRO Atmospheric Research company in Australia has made information available on
the internet which appears to be of value with this inquiry. The following photograph and link to
their site shows a microphotograph in the lower left of pine pollen which is a match both visually
as well as for size. The stated size of the pollen grain shown is 56 microns, I have measured
40-50 microns. Pine is also reasonably common in the Santa Fe region, although Juniper is more
common in the actual location of rainwater collection. I will assume no further research on this
topic is required unless someone provides information to the contrary to that which I have found.
The web page will be maintained but reduced in rank on the website index listing. With the
exception of these objects now identified, there is no additional material of unusual interest that I
have identified within the two rainwater samples analyzed.

The following image originates from CSIRO Atmospheric Research

and a link to the company web page is as follows:
http://www.dar.csiro.au/info/airwatch/Appendix_3.htm

114
 Jun
INQUIRY : RAINWATER ANALYSIS

Clifford E Carnicom
July 6 2000

115
 Jun
INQUIRY : RAINWATER ANALYSIS

Santa Fe NM (El Dorado) received the first substantial rains of the year 2000 on June 26 and 27.
Rainwater samples from these storms have been analyzed under the microscope. The water was
collected within a clean cookie sheet on both days separately and placed in separate clean glass jars.
Both samples are showing the following structures which I am requesting identification assistance with.
They appear to be a double celled structure; no movement is apparent under the microscope. The cells
or objects measure approximately 40-50 microns in diameter. In general, two denser spherical volumes
appear to be connected by a less dense material that channels between the end spheres. Magnification
of these images is at 200x. Contrast and brightness have been enhanced to further reveal the structure.
The cells occur individually as well as within clusters; the former arrangement is more common.

Identification from those knowledgeable in microbiology and microscopy, or suggestions for identification
of these images would be beneficial. These cells or objects are the primary objects which have been
identified within both rain samples, other than what appear to be infrequent fibers and/or debris. Thank
you for any assistance on this matter.

It would be of much interest if any other readers in other parts of the country are able to duplicate the
results shown on this page.

Any comments or statements regarding identification of the cells, objects, or structures shown
on this page are welcome. Comments can be posted on the message board attached to
www.carnicom.com, or email sent directly to info@carnicominstitute.org. Thank you for any
assistance in identification.

116
 Jun
INQUIRY : RAINWATER ANALYSIS

Image Magnification approx. 200x

Clifford E Carnicom
June 27 2000

Additional Microphotographs
Posted June 30 2000

Magnification on left is approx 500x, on right is approx 1000x

A dominant and striking characteristic of the unidentified cells or objects

is the separation of two denser spherical volumes by a region of
relatively clear mass. There is an encircling sheath or envelope around the
dual-celled structures or organisms.

117
 Jun
INQUIRY : RAINWATER ANALYSIS

A slight curve can sometimes be seen in the overall shape, somewhat

similar to the outline of a Lima bean. Notice that the typical relatively clear
region between two denser masses is seen in the lowest object of this set.

Effective Magnification is approx. 500x.

The line encircling the object is an air bubble
and is to be disregarded.

This is a cluster of the binary cells or objects, and shows some of the
variability as well as the common feature of two denser regions
separated by a region of more translucent material.

118
 Jun
INQUIRY : RAINWATER ANALYSIS

Any comments or statements regarding identification of the cells, objects, or structures shown
on this page are welcome. Comments can be posted on the message board attached to
www.carnicom.com, or email sent directly to info@carnicominstitute.org. Thank you for any
assistance in identification.

Clifford E Carnicom
June 30 2000

119
 Jun
EPA REFUSES TO IDENTIFY SAMPLE

EPA REFUSES TO IDENTIFY SAMPLE

Jun 28, 2000

EPA REFUSES
TO IDENTIFY SAMPLE
The following letter dated June 28 2000 has been received through the office of
Carol M. Browner, Administrator of the United States Environmental Protection Agency.
The office of Carol M. Browner by inaction to previous requests refuses to identify the ground
sample
which has been sent to her via certified mail, and refuses to conduct an investigation on this
matter.

Let this (in)action be a part of the public record.

Clifford E Carnicom
July 27 2000

120
Jun
EPA REFUSES TO IDENTIFY SAMPLE

121
 Jun
EPA REFUSES TO IDENTIFY SAMPLE

122
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)