Rock Cutting by Disc Cutters
Rock Cutting by Disc Cutters
(1) Diameter, D = 100, 125, 150, 175, 200 mm; The experimental procedure involved setting the
(2) Penetration, P = 2, 4, 6, 8, 10 mm; disc at the required level of penetration and then
(3) Edge angle, ~b = 60, 70, 80, 90, 100°; moving it, under power, into and across the surface of
(4) Cutting speed, v = 76, 102,127, 152, 178 mm/sec; the rock specimen. The thrust and rolling forces acting
(5) Spacing, S = 12, 24, 36, 48, 60 mm. on the disc during cutting were continuously measured
and recorded.
Variables (1-4) are c o n c e r n e d with single unrelieved Instrumentation included a solid plate dynamometer
disc operation, whereas (5) spacing, involves a capable of resolving the force acting on the disc into 3
determination of the optimum separation of adjacent mutually perpendicular components. This was equip-
tools in an array. ped with 24 resistance strain gauges arranged in 3
Since there is a strong possibility of interaction networks. Outputs from the 3 bridges were fed via
between some of the variables, it would normally be amplifying an integrating circuitry to a S.E. System
necessary to undertake a full factorial experiment 4000 u.v. galvanometer recorder. Power input to the
involving all interacting variables. Full factorial system was from a 5.8 V, 3 kHz stabilised supply.
coverage of 5 variables each at 5 levels would have
involved 12,500 cutting tests, allowing a minimum of 4
T H E O R E T I C A L ANALYSIS OF DISC FORCES
replications.
An experiment of this size was unmanageable and It is not difficult to appreciate that the forces
recourse was made to partial factorial planning. involved in cutting with a disc will be influenced by its
P r o t o d y a k o n o v & T e d e r have developed a technique geometry and the strength of the rock it is required to
of systematic sampling of an experimental matrix penetrate.
based on orthogonal Latin Squares and their method An elementary analysis of the mechanics of disc
was used for this experiment. A full description of the operation can be provided by invoking several assump-
method, which includes procedures for establishing tions and approximations, none of which depart too
empirical equations, appears elsewhere[6, 7]. far from reality, but the introduction of which
The parameters of disc performance are listed and considerably enhances mathematical simplicity.
defined: Consider, as shown in Fig. 1, a disc of edge angle 4~
(a) Thrust force F T - - t h e average force required to and diameter D, penetrating a rock surface to a depth
be applied perpendicular to the direction of rolling, to ' p ' under the action of a force F~.
maintain the disc at the prescribed level of penetration As penetration increases, so does the chord length
(units kN). of contact 'l' such that
(b) Rolling force F R - - t h e average force required to
be applied in the direction of cutting to cause the disc I = 2V'Dp - p2. (1)
to roll at the prescribed level of penetration (units kN).
(c) Yield, Q - - t h e volume of rock excavated by the It is assumed that the resistance to penetration is
disc per unit distance cut (units m3/km). essentially compressive and that the force FT is
(d) Specific energy, E s - - t h e work done per unit equivalent to a compressive stress acting over the
volume of rock cut (units M J/m3). projected area of disc contact " A ' . A precise
determination of area A involves a complex expres-
sion, which to a first approximation can be simplified
CUTTING RIG AND INSTRUMENTATION
with negligible loss of accuracy to:
The cutting rig used in these experiments was an
extensively modified linear shaping machine. A stiff
A = 2 p l tan -~ (2)
box-sectioned f r a m e w o r k had been fitted over the 2
cutting table to provide a track to both constrain and
guide the disc during its forward motion. The frame The thrust force to effect a penetration ' p ' m a y ,
limited the deflection of the tool during cutting to therefore, be written:
under 0.5 mm at vertical loads of up to 50kN. A
further modification was the replacement of the F~- = 4or tan ~ X/Dp 3 - p ", (3)
normal driving mechanism by a power pack and
hydraulic ram providing a stroke of 800ram and
maximum in-line force of 50 kN. Hydraulic power was
supplied by a swash plate pump driven by a 7.5 kW
motor and capable of generating cutting speeds of up
to 200 mm/sec.
A rock specimen of maximum dimensions 0-5 m
square by 0-3 m high could be a c c o m m o d a t e d by the
machine. The disc, mounted in a bearing housing, was
bolted to a triaxial force d y n a m o m e t e r which was
firmly attached to the end of the machine crosshead. Fig. 1. Geometry of disc penetration.
Rock Excavation by Disc Cutter 363
30 Cutting direction
Fig. 2. Ultra-violet trace of thrust force for stationary and rolling conditions.
- p
/\ Fr = •fD
P -- • (7)
( FR 1 + / Z ~ / p
y
magnitude with the measured data, although the fact Z
4C Fr ~ ~c
that the theoretical FR is greater than the measured ) . 2 ~ ~"
E
value should be noted. Reasons for this will be
u
considered later. o
u
2O 9r ~
EL 2C
Rock yield as shown in Fig. 4b is independent of G
(o)
Meosured
Fig. 6. Effect of disc edge angle.
6C - ( b )
--- Theoreficol
3C
E Theoretical values of rolling force follow the same
4C O O 02 -.. trend as the measured data, but as was also the case
FT/ /
. 2c
c x~x
with diameter and penetration, the magnitude differs.
u
o u 2( O.I --~
The persistently higher theoretical rolling force
LL
)- derives from the assumption that the resultant force in
FR . . . . . . . . . . Fig. 3 acts at the mid point of the arc of contact acb. In
I ~ I
50 ioo 150 200 "~0 I00 150 200 reality R will originate at a point somewhere between
Disc diometer, mm DiSC d i o m e t e r , c and b. The effect of this shift will be to increase of
and reduce oe therereby producing an increase in the
Fig. 4. Effect of disc diameter.
FT/FR ratio. A small movement of this origin would
clearly result in an appreciable change of ratio.
2. Effect of penetration Figure 6b shows that yield is independent of edge
Penetration, as shown in Fig. 5a, causes a rapid angle implying that the breakout angle of the rock is
increase in both F r and FR. constant and, therefore, specific energy can be
Both of the measured curves agree quite well in expected to, and does, increase in similar fashion to
magnitude and trend with the theoretical equations F,.
%
-.. 5 c - (b] Fs = F cos
Fso
--O u' C, O "'
4o[- (o) 4(
Q o F r
and (8)
',-' o ~ 3( x ,~ O x m
x ^ E
• 2o ®
,Q 2d 9~
.,,=_ FT = 2 F sin ~b
FR ~, ,o P_ 2
>-
h / I I I
so that
050 i~ I o 200 °~o Ioo 15o 2
with S/P.
As SIP increases from zero, the yield ratio 0"5
increases and reaches unity (i.e. QR = Qu) at SIP = 3.
Continuing beyond this point, the yield ratio increases I I I
to a clearly defined maximum of about 2 when S[P is io 20 5o
.~L:.!o_~o°
the experimental work of breaking by 'slabbing' of the ( 90*
rock between adjacent grooves when the disc spacing
ratios were between roughly 3 and 7, which coincides ~, 40 70 °
Z
60
/j/o60°
/ / 60
/~:90 ~
40
- // // 40--
o
7 qb =60 °
20 _
20-
JE
//<z
'0"/ l 1 I
2 4 6 0 2 4 6
Penetration, mm Penetration, mm
Fig. 9. Comparison of disc force analysis with the results of Morrell, Bruce and Larson.