Individual Performance Commitment and Review Form (Ipcrf) For Teachers Elementary Level
Individual Performance Commitment and Review Form (Ipcrf) For Teachers Elementary Level
ELEMENTARY LEVEL
(1st Semester)
Name of Employee VERVINA T. VILLONES Name of Rater MEDELINA B. BESARIO
Position TEACHER III WEIGHT Position MASTER TEACHER 1
ACTUAL
Review Period KRA 1st Semester ( May-October)TIMELINE
OBJECTIVES PER Date of Review
QUALITY OCTOBER 27, 2017
EFFICIENCY TIMELINESS RATING SCORE
RESULT
Bureau/Center/Service/Division San Isidro ES/ Sta. Fe District/ Leyte Division
KRA
MFO
KRA 1 I. Teaching 35%
Learning
Process
Q E T A 1. Prepared at least 90 (May- 5% 5 - Prepared 90 and above 5 - submitted before Q-90 0. 250
complete DLP/DLL October) complete and the 1st period of E- -
5 - 5 5 throughout the rating congruent set of lesson classes T-during
1st period
period. plans/DLL 4 - submitted during
4 - Prepared 68-89 the 1st period of
complete and classes
congruent set of lesson 3 - submitted during
plans/ DLL the 2nd period of
3 - Prepared 67 complete classes
and congruent set of 2 - submitted during
lesson plans/DLL the 3rd period of
2 - Prepared 24-45 classes
complete and 1 - submitted during
congruent set of lesson the 4th period of
plans/DLL classes or beyond
1 - Prepared 23 and below within the day
complete set of lesson
plans/DLL
Q E T A
4 4 - 4
2. Utilized at least 3 (May- 6% (Refer to DepEd Order 5 - Utilized 5 or more Q-
Varied Learning October) No. 42, s. 2016) appropriate IMs Audio,
Resources that are 5 - ICT/Multimedia, 4 - Utilized 4 & 0.240
appropriate to the Audio, Visual and
Page 1 of 18
lesson’s objective Printed and appropriate IMs Visual
daily. Manipulative 3 - Utilized 3 E- 4
(ICT/Multimedia, instructional materials appropriate IMs T- -
Visual and Printed were utilized through- 2 - Utilized 2
Materials, out the lessons. appropriate IMs
Manipulative) 4 - Audio, Visual and 1 - Utilized only 1
MOV: Printed and IM
- IMs Checklist manipulative
instructional materials
were utilized through-
out
the lessons.
3 - Visual, Printed and
other Manipulative
instructional materials
were utilized through-
out the lessons.
2 - Printed materials were
Q E T A utilized throughout the
lessons.
4 4 - 4 1 - Innovative instructional
materials were not
utilized throughout the
lessons.
5. Taught all
competencies in the 5% 5 - with 90-100% 5 - 90-100% in line
Budget of Lesson per mastery With the LCD Q- 89%
quarter in all subject 4 - with 80-89% mastery 5 - 95% - 100% and 4 - 80-89% in line E- 85%
areas with at least 75% 3 - with 70-79% mastery above of the with the LCD T- 89%
mastery. competencies for 3 - 70-79% in line 0.200
2 - with 60-69% mastery
MOV: the quarter were with the LCD
Lesson Plan 1 - with 59 and below taught 2 - 60-69% in line
mastery 4 - 85-94% with the LCD
LCD (Learning
Competency 3 - 75-84% 1 - 59 and below in
Directory)/Budget of 2 - 65-74% line with mastery
Lessons
1 - 64% and below
Curriculum Guide
Teacher’s M&E
Report (SMEA)
Q E T A
6. Constructed/Enhanced (May- 4% 5 - Constructed/enhanced 5 - indexed Q- -
- 3 3 3
40 complete varied October 60 or more IMs/eIMs E- 4 0.120
indexed IMs/e- 4- daily T-
IMs/Learning 3 - constructed/enhanced 4 - indexed weekly
Page 4 of 18
Resources. 40-49 only IMs/eIMs
(Note: Acknowledge 2 - constructed/enhanced every other
the source of the 30-39 only day
copied materials and 1 - constructed/enhanced 3 - indexed
show the enhanced 29 and below IMs/eIMs
materials) weekly
2 - indexed
IMs/eIMs
monthly
1 - indexed
IMs/eIMs
quarterly
5 - - 5
Quarterly Test. SMEA T- -
2nd & 3rd
(Note: To be Quarter
implemented in SY Result
2017-2018)
Page 5 of 18
MOV: Quarterly Test
Result
Q E T A
3. Attained a 0 drop-out (May- 2% 5 - 0 dropout rate Q- 0
1 - - 1
rate in all classes October 4 - 0.1-1.0% dropout rate drop-out
handled for the for E- - 0.100
attainment of the 3 - 1.1-2.0% dropout rate T- -
Grades 2-
objectives of the 6 only) 2 - 2.1-3.0% dropout rate
School Banner Project.
1 - above 3.0% dropout rate
MOV: LIS
(transfer to KRA on
access)
Q E T A
1 - - 1
Q E T A 5 - 0 non-reader Q- above
3.0%
4. Zero-out non-readers (May- 2% 4 - non-reader is only 0.1- (11)
3 - - 3 (for grades 1 to 6) October 1.0% of E- -
(Based on EGRA/ Phil for the class T- -
IRI result) Grades 2- 3 - non-reader is only 1.1- 0.020
6 only) 2.0% of
MOV: Phil-IRI Result, the class
SMEA Report 2 - non-reader is only 2.1-
3.0% of
the class
1 - non-reader is above
3.0% of the
class
Q- 3.0%
0f the class
5. Zero-out non – (May- 2% (11)
5 - 0 non-numerates E- -
numerates (based on October) 0.020
the EGMA and other 4 - non-numerates is only T- -
test) 0.1-1.0% of the class
3 - non-numerates is only
MOV: Numeracy Test 1.1-2.0% of the class
Result, SMEA Report 2 - non-numerates is only
2.1-3.0% of the class Q- 3
readers
Page 6 of 18
1 - non-numerates is above E- -
3.0% of the class T- -
5 - increased 5 or more
6. Increased number of readers from current
readers from non- 3% reading level to the next
reader to frustration higher reading level 0.090
level; from frustration 4 - increased 4 readers from
to instructional/ current reading level to
independent level in the next higher reading
all classes handled level
(Note: Non-adviser 3 - increased 3 readers from
will take the reading current reading level to
performance of the the next higher reading
classes handled) level
2 - increased 2 readers from
MOV: Phil-IRI current reading level to
Result, SMEA Result the next higher reading
level
1 - increased 1 reader from
current reading level to
the next higher
Page 7 of 18
performance-
3 - Compiled complete
students written
and product/
performance-based
output
2 - Compiled complete
written output with
no performance/product-
based output/not
properly labelled
Speaker/Trainer, E- -
T- -
Facilitator,
Curriculum writer,
Sports Officiating
Officials
MOV: Certificates
Q E T A.
A 100% Daily 100% attendance in 1% 5 - Perfect Attendance Q- perfect
attendance
Attendance academic classes and 4 - 1 to 2 absences 0.050
non- academic activities 3 - 3 to 5 absences E- -
5 - - 5
of the school 2 - 6 to 8 absences T- -
1 - 9 or more absences
Page 16 of 18
Rater- Ratee Agreement
The signatures below confirm that the employee and his/her superior have agreed on content of this appraisal form and the performance rating.
Signature Signature
INSTRUCTIONS:
1. For teachers who have served at least a year of service in DepEd, they must fill-out the two (2) sets of IPCRF (1 st Semester and 2nd Semester). To
come-up with the Overall Rating for SY 2017-2018, they must add-up the initial rating for the two (2) rating periods and divide it by 2, for
example: 4.3 (initial rating for the 1st Sem.); 4.6 (initial rating for the 2nd Sem.):
4.3 + 4.5 = 8.8
Page 17 of 18
8.8/2 = 4.4
4.4 = Final IPCRF rating for SY 2017-2018
2. For newly hired teachers, they have to fill-in the semesters applicable to their ACTUAL date of service. For example:
a. Teacher A, hired August 6, 2017, IPCRF to be filled-in should be both 1 st Semester and 2nd Semester;
b. Teacher B, hired November 8, 2017, IPCRF to be filled-in should be for the 2 nd Semester only, therefore, the initial rating for
the 2nd Semester shall become the FINAL rating.
3. This IPCRF ready-to-print and is consisting of 13 pages. YOU ARE NOT ALLOWED TO MAKE ANY CORRECTIONS/ALTERATIONS/ADDITIONS to the
template. Any comments/suggestions will be treated separately.
Page 18 of 18