Scribd
Upload
51 views5 pages

Course Completion Times (Hours) : Current Training Proposed Training Current Training

1.) The document contains data on course completion times under current and proposed training methods. Statistical analyses were conducted to compare the mean completion times and variances between the two methods. 2.) Hypothesis testing using a z-test showed no significant difference between the population means of current and proposed training. However, an F-test found a significant difference between the population variances. 3.) Based on the statistical analyses, the proposed training method has a more consistent completion time compared to the current method, as evidenced by the significantly different population variances between the two. Therefore, the proposed training method is preferred.

Uploaded by

Hope Trinity Enriquez
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
51 views5 pages

Course Completion Times (Hours) : Current Training Proposed Training Current Training

1.) The document contains data on course completion times under current and proposed training methods. Statistical analyses were conducted to compare the mean completion times and variances between the two methods. 2.) Hypothesis testing using a z-test showed no significant difference between the population means of current and proposed training. However, an F-test found a significant difference between the population variances. 3.) Based on the statistical analyses, the proposed training method has a more consistent completion time compared to the current method, as evidenced by the significantly different population variances between the two. Therefore, the proposed training method is preferred.

Uploaded by

Hope Trinity Enriquez
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 5

Course Completion Times (hours)

Current Training Proposed Training


76 74
76 75 1.) Current Training
77 77
74 78 Column1
76 74
74 80 Mean
74 73 Standard
77 73 Median
72 78 Mode
78 76 Standard
73 76 Sample Va
78 74 Kurtosis
75 77 Skewness
80 69 Range
79 76 Minimum
72 75 Maximum
69 72 Sum
79 75 Count
72 72
70 76 Similarity: Values of mean, m
70 72 Difference: Values of variance
81 77
76 73
78 77 2.) Ho: There is no difference betw
72 69 H1: There is difference betwee
82 77
72 75
73 76
71 74
70 77
77 75
78 78
73 72
79 77
82 78
65 78
77 76
79 75
73 76
76 76

81 75
69 76
75 80
75 77
77 76
79 75
76 73
78 77
76 77
76 77
73 79
77 75
84 75 3.) Hypotheses are formulated to
74 72
74 82 Ho: Population variances are e
69 76 H1: Population variances are n
79 76
66 74 F-Test Two-Sample for Varian
70 72
74 78
72 71 Mean
Variance
Observati
df
F
P(F<=f) on
F Critical

F statistic is equal to 2.47729. P


level of significance). Thus, nu
significant difference between
Current Training Proposed training

Column1 Column1

75.0655737704918 Mean 75.4262295082


0.505093646275282 Standard Error 0.320909752216
76 Median 76
76 Mode 76
3.94490748712403 Standard Deviation 2.506385288242
15.5622950819672 Sample Variance 6.281967213115
-0.069325276438235 Kurtosis 0.586940413874
-0.220533558110778 Skewness -0.28748624289
19 Range 13
65 Minimum 69
84 Maximum 82
4579 Sum 4601
61 Count 61

Similarity: Values of mean, mode and median are same.


Difference: Values of variances and standard deviation are different.

Ho: There is no difference between population mean.


H1: There is difference between population mean.

Population Variance
Current 16.2628501077255
Proposed 6.41243459526008

Mean
Current 75.0175438596491
Proposed 75.3859649122807

z-Test: Two Sample for Means


Variable 1 Variable 2
Mean 75.0655737704918 75.4262295082
Known Variance 15.307 6.17898
Observations 61 61
Hypothesized Mean
Difference 0
z -0.607687327405413
P(Z<=z) one-tail 0.271697434770869
z Critical one-tail 1.64485362695147
P(Z<=z) two-tail 0.543394869541738
z Critical two-tail 1.95996398454005

z statistic is equal to -0.607687. P value is 0.54339 which is greater than 0.05 (value of
level of significance). Thus, null hypothesis cannot be rejected. There is no difference
between population means.

Hypotheses are formulated to test the euality of population variances.

Ho: Population variances are equal.


H1: Population variances are not equal.

F-Test Two-Sample for Variances

Variable 1 Variable 2
75.0655737704918 75.4262295081967
15.5622950819672 6.28196721311475
61 61
60 60
2.47729645093946
0.000289015769198
1.53431417981236

F statistic is equal to 2.47729. P value is 0.0005 which is less than 0.05 (value of
level of significance). Thus, null hypothesis has been rejected. There is
significant difference between population variances.
indicatin- that this method is more
4.)
consistent with the completion time.
Based on the data available the
proposed method is  preferred.

Yes I would suggest to interchange the


5.)
data, then conduct same data. If still
test gives same results. Then there is
need for new training program.

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy