Final
Final
Rationale
The primary text used in this unit of work is Shakespeare’s Romeo and Juliet, and it was designed for year 9. The predominant pedagogical
approaches used when designing this unit were the inquiry-based and collaborative approaches. Often in large group discussions students
avoid contributing due to the fear of being wrong. Wright (2012) suggests that working in pairs allows children to explore concepts of the texts
in an environment “where they don’t feel too exposed” (p. 7). The think-pair-share model was used in the lesson planning as it allows students
to work autonomously without major input from the teacher; the students are bouncing ideas and theories off each other instead of relying on
teacher-directed learning. The outcome of this strategy is often an enriched and authentic analysis of a text rather than just parroting what the
teacher says: this is an example of a collaborative approach to pedagogy. Milner and Milner (2008) state that a teacher is a “guide on the side,
not the sage on the stage” (p. 467), this statement encourages student-directed or inquiry-based learning. Fostering creativity and imagination
are important in education, there were three main creative tasks that approached the text from a new perspective. Firstly students were
tasked with creating a Facebook profile for a character from Romeo and Juliet, which allowed students creative liberty. Rather than filling out a
character analysis worksheet students were able to connect with the text in a more accessible format. By changing the format of the lesson,
and making it personally relevant to the students, allows the potential for the content to “penetrate and hold fast” (Milner and Milner, 2008,
p. 467). The second task that was created to ignite imagination was the poster lesson. This lesson students needed to create an advertisement
that will persuade people to see the production of Romeo and Juliet, encouraging students to analyse the text and find the key themes of the
text as well as punchy headlines. Lastly, the puppet show at the end of the unit. The task could have been a comparative essay, or another
writing task that can dissuade students from embracing Shakespeare in their education. While these tasks are useful, in order to foster
creativity and imagination in students the task set was a collaborative task that most students will find entertaining. There are a lot of
elements to this task, and it probably should have been set as summative assessment however with the unit length being quite short I decided
1
18208782 – Katherine Grant
to run it within lessons. Overall this unit shows a range of pedagogical approaches, favouring the student-directed tasks over the teacher-
directed lessons.
Unit Description
In this unit students explore the nature of conflict in Shakespeare’s Romeo and Juliet, with particular attention to how relationships are
constructed, in a range of texts. They will examine both the external conflicts and the internal emotional conflict. Through the analysis of
certain scenes students are able to see the literary techniques Shakespeare used to develop memorable characters, solidifying his place as a
canonical writer. Students are given the chance to explore human connection and relationships, as well as the overarching theme of conflict,
through creating their own adaptation of Romeo and Juliet. This task fosters creativity and imagination within the students.
Outcomes
Outcome 1: responds to and composes increasingly sophisticated and sustained texts for understanding, interpretation, critical analysis,
imaginative expression and pleasure
Outcome 2: effectively uses and critically assesses a wide range of processes, skills, strategies and knowledge for responding to and
composing a wide range of texts in different media and technologies
Outcome 3: selects and uses language forms, features and structures of texts appropriate to a range of purposes, audiences and contexts,
describing and explaining their effects on meaning
Outcome 4: effectively transfers knowledge, skills and understanding of language concepts into new and different contexts
Outcome 5: thinks imaginatively, creatively, interpretively and critically about information and increasingly complex ideas and arguments to
respond to and compose texts in a range of contexts
2
18208782 – Katherine Grant
2 Outcome 9 Student will complete a questionnaire that hints at the main Resource 1 -Questionnaire Formative assessment:
understand the learning themes and plot of Romeo and Juliet. teacher will evaluate
purposes, specific Resource 2 – Printed copy students’ analysis of
requirements and Teacher will make clear the expectations of the unit prior to of prologue the prologue to ensure
targeted outcomes of commencement of reading the play. they are linking back to
tasks The intrinsic question that needs to be answered by the end the text.
of the unit is: why are Shakespearean texts considered
timeless?
3
18208782 – Katherine Grant
3 Outcome 1 Students will observe how vocabulary choices in the text Resource 3 Formative assessment:
identify how vocabulary contribute to the distinctive writing style of Shakespeare. by collecting the
choices contribute to student’s ‘dictionaries’
specificity, abstraction As a class we will hypothesise the main barrier Shakespeare’s it allows the teacher to
and stylistic style of writing creates in the modern reader, and think of reflect on the
effectiveness ways to break the barrier. effectiveness of the
task, whilst ensure
Think-Pair-Share. Students will be given a list of common students are
Shakespearean terms, they will individually convert to completing the work
modern English. The students will be paired to compare set.
answers and fill in any blanks, then come together as a class
to ensure everyone has filled in all areas.
4 Outcome 3 As a class we will create a plot summary for Act 1. Resource 4 Formative assessment:
analyse and explain collecting the students
how text structures, In order to familiarise themselves with the characters in social media profile will
language features and Romeo and Juliet students will be playing a guessing game. show where students
visual features of texts The teacher will read aloud the character descriptions and are excelling or
and the context in students will guess based on these clues. struggling with
4
18208782 – Katherine Grant
6 Outcome 6 Students are asked how they would define conflict. Give the Resource 5
explore and students a few minutes to write down a definition, discuss as
appreciate the a class. Romeo and Juliet opening
similarities and Students are shown the two images in resource 5, the class fight scene:
differences between will discuss how these images are similar/different. https://www.youtube.com
and among more /watch?v=SEzskNtFnIY
demanding texts Independently students identify 3 examples of conflict either
5
18208782 – Katherine Grant
6
18208782 – Katherine Grant
9 Outcome 1: As a class we will finish our plot summary, we will now have a Resource 6
present an argument clear summary of all the important/notable parts of the play.
about a literary text This will help us for later activities.
based on initial
impressions and In the prologue Romeo and Juliet are described as star-
subsequent analysis of crossed lovers. From the beginning they are running against
the whole text the clock, and seem to be attempting to defy fate. Reflect on
the previous lesson regarding fate vs free-will, students will
now be arguing whether the blame can be placed on other
characters.
7
18208782 – Katherine Grant
8
18208782 – Katherine Grant
12 Outcome 4 : Flashbacks improve narrative, the task this lesson will build
appreciate and value on their skills in writing creative narratives, it will show them
the ways language how to add depth to their character development.
concepts, ideas and
information can be Using the knowledge you have regarding the themes reshape
shaped and the tone of the story by writing an imaginative piece starting
transformed for new with “It wasn’t meant to go this way…”. The aim of this task is
and different context to take on the perspective of a regretful Romeo or Juliet. The
point is to transform the text into a new context.
Outcome 6:
research and explore This allows students to recap the text from their own point of
the texts of specific view.
composers, e.g. a
novelist, poet,
filmmaker or dramatist,
considering themes,
language techniques
and similarities and
differences in their
works.
13 Outcome 6: Intertextuality. Reaffirm the definition of intertextuality and
investigate, hypothesise how it is used in literature. Refer to the fact that the story of Luhrmann’s 1996 pool
and explain the ways a Romeo and Juliet was not created by Shakespeare, that he in scene:
concept may be fact used intertextuality to recreate a known story with such https://www.youtube.com
9
18208782 – Katherine Grant
14 Outcome 6 Students will be advised of the puppet show they are working Resource 7: scaffold
create imaginative texts towards. Students will form groups of 4 to create a script
that make relevant backdrop and finger puppets. This group will choose a scene
thematic and from Romeo and Juliet to recreate a modern adaptation of
intertextual the text. Using the Scaffold provided students work
connections with other collaboratively to construct an original idea using themes and
texts generalised plot.
10
18208782 – Katherine Grant
deliver presentations,
selecting and Students will work on their script this lesson, as well as their
sequencing appropriate finger puppets and backdrop. Teacher will provide craft
content and multimodal materials to create the puppets. Students will create scene
elements to influence a backdrops with either create a A4 sheet of paper or a digital
course of action image.
16 Outcome 5: Students will perform their plays for the class. Resource 8
understand and explain Students will be given feedback cards where the will grade
the ways in which their peers, resource 8.
composers transform
ideas and experience Lastly we will wrap up the unit by discussing why
into and within texts, Shakespeare’s plays are considered timeless. Focus heavily on
including consideration the way Shakespeare represents the depth and complexity of
of their insight, human interactions.
imaginative powers and
ingenuity
Outcome 2:
review, edit and refine
students’ own and
others’ texts for control
of content,
organisation, sentence
structure, vocabulary,
and/or visual features
to achieve particular
purposes and effects
Resource 1
11
18208782 – Katherine Grant
True or False
Answer the following questions with a true or false. Be prepared to justify your responses.
2. Do you believe your parent or guardian knows what’s best for you?
12
18208782 – Katherine Grant
Resource 2
13
18208782 – Katherine Grant
Resource 3
thou =
ye =
thee =
thine or thy =
art = hence =
dost = oft =
doth = yea =
'ere = ay =
hast = aught =
14
18208782 – Katherine Grant
wast = marry =
whence = nay =
wherefore = hie =
15
18208782 – Katherine Grant
thou = you (subject, singular, informal) e.g. "Thou wast in the next room."
ye = you (subject, plural) e.g. "Ye all came forth from the room."
thee = you (object... "to you" ) e.g. "I saw thee in the other room."
16
18208782 – Katherine Grant
Resource 4
17 Who am I?
18208782 – Katherine Grant
Resource 5
18
18208782 – Katherine Grant
Resource 6
Changing Fate
As a class discuss who could have prevented Romeo and Juliet’s death.
List the characters below.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
19
18208782 – Katherine Grant
Resource 7
20
18208782 – Katherine Grant
Resource 8
Feedback forms
1. Did the play address one of the key themes in Shakespeare’s Romeo and Juliet? If yes
please state the theme used.
______________________________________________
______________________________________________
3. What were the similarities and differences between this adaptation and the original play?
_________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________
21
18208782 – Katherine Grant
References
HISTORY. (2016, April 05). Retrieved May 03, 2019, from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HUHEPo_g0AQ
Milner, J. O., & Milner, L. F. (2008). Bridging English. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson/Merrill/Prentice Hall.
Movieclips. (2013, July 30). Retrieved May 03, 2019, from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m7xTvb-FAhQ
Robson, S. (2014, March 25). Retrieved May 03, 2019, from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SEzskNtFnIY
Wright, T. (2012). How to be a brilliant English teacher. Routledge.
22