Individual Performance Commitment and Review

Forms
Employee: MARY ANN FRANCIS A. BELTRAN Name of Rater: PRISCILLA F. ALVIOR

Position: Teacher I Position: Secondary School Principal II

Reviewer Period: June – October 2014 Date of Review: March 2015

Bureau/Center/ Service/ Division: Nueva Ecija

TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED IN DURING EVALUATION

MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE Weight PERFORMANCE OUTPUTS ACTUAL RATING SCORE*
per KRA INDICATORS (Quality, RESULTS
Efficiency, Timelines)
Teaching- 1. Prepared Daily June 2014 – 30% (5)  Daily Lesson
Learning lesson Logs/Plans October  All Daily Lesson Plans/Logs with
Process activities including 2014 Logs/Plans had teaching
appropriate, complete parts strategies
adequate and  Attained 130% above of  Instructional
updated instructional the learning Materials
materials competencies.  Learners
 Instructional materials Manual and
were adequate, updated other resource
and appropriate to the materials by
daily logs of activities. subject area
(4)
 Had 4 of the 5 parts of
the Daily Lesson
Logs/Plans
 Attained 115-129% of
the learning
competencies.
 Instructional materials
were adequate and
appropriate to the daily
logs of activities.
 (3)
 Had 3 of the 5 parts of
the Daily Lesson
Logs/Plans
 Attained 100-114% of
the learning
competencies.
 With adequate
instructional but not
updated.
(2)
 Had 2 of the 5 parts of
the Daily Lesson
Logs/Plans
 Attained 51-99% of the
learning competencies.
 With instructional
materials but
inadequate to daily logs
of activities.
(1)
 Had 1 of the 5 parts of
the Daily Lesson
Logs/Plans
 Attained 50% and below
of the learning
competencies.
 No instructional
materials presented.
(5)
2. Facilitated learning  Has provided individual  Functional
in classroom through learning activities for lesson
functional daily 130% and above of the plans/daily logs
lesson logs/plans and pupils handled for every  Teaching/
innovative teaching rating period with learning
strategies evidences strategies/rating
 Cooperative learning period
 activities/strategies  Portfolio of
applied was 130% and visual aids, LM’s
above effectiveness and other
 Had prepared 130% and instructional
above of updated and aide by subject
adequate visual aids for area/grading
every lesson throughout period
the RPMS cycle  Group activities
 Teaching followed by the
methods/strategies pupils per
produced 130% and learning area
above class interaction
(4)
 Had provided individual
learning activities for
115 – 129% of the pupils
handled for every rating
period with evidences
 Cooperative learning
activities/strategies
applied was 115 - 129%
effectiveness
 Had prepared 115 -
129% of updated and
adequate audio-visual
aids for every lesson
throughout the RPMS
cycle
 Teaching
methods/strategies
produced 115 – 129%
class interaction
(3)
 Had provided individual
learning activities for
115 – 129% of the pupils
handled for every rating
 period with evidences
 Cooperative learning
activities/strategies
applied was 100 - 114%
effectiveness
 Had prepared 100 -
114% of updated and
adequate visual aids for
every lesson throughout
the RPMS cycle
 Teaching
methods/strategies
produced 100 – 114%
class interaction
(2)
 Had provided individual
learning activities for 51
– 99% of the pupils
handled for every rating
period with evidences
 Cooperative learning
activities/strategies
applied was 51 - 99%
effectiveness
 Had prepared 51 - 99%
of updated and
adequate visual aids for
every lesson throughout
the RPMS cycle
 Teaching
methods/strategies
produced 51 – 99% class
interaction
(1)
 Had provided individual
learning activities for
50% and below of the
 pupils handled for every
rating period with
evidences
 Cooperative learning
activities/strategies
applied was 50% and
below effectiveness
 Had prepared 50% and
below of updated and
adequate visual aids for
every lesson throughout
the RPMS cycle
 Teaching
methods/strategies
produced 50% and
below class interaction
(5)
3. Initiated discipline  Pupils were given 130%  Classroom rules
of pupils including and above guidance as and regulations
classroom rules and per class rules and  Records system
guidelines in regulations used in
accomplishing  Had 130% and above recognizing
individual/group task record contained in well-behaved
throughout RPMS individual pupils pupils
cycle ‘portfolio  Report
 Specific and clear card/journal
classroom rules and descriptive and
guidance rating
(4) comments.
 Pupils were given 115 -
129% guidance as per
class rules and
regulations
 Had 115 - 129% record
contained in individual
pupils ‘portfolio
 Specific and clear
 classroom rules and
guidance
(3)
 Pupils were given 100 -
114% guidance as per
class rules and
regulations
 Had 100 - 114% record
contained in individual
pupils ‘portfolio
 Specific and clear
classroom rules and
guidance
(2)
 Pupils were given 51 -
99% guidance as per
class rules and
regulations
 Had 51 - 99% record
contained in individual
pupils ‘portfolio
 Specific and clear
classroom rules and
guidance
(1)
 Pupils were given 50%
and below guidance as
per class rules and
regulations
 Had 50% and below
record contained in
individual pupils
‘portfolio
 Specific and clear
classroom rules and
guidance
Pupils/Student 1. Evaluated June- 25% (5)
s Outcome Pupils/students’ October  130% and above of the  Complete and
progress every rating 2014 pupils/students’ accurate Class
period with analysis progress were evaluated Record
and analyzed with  Documents on
evidences the
 Conducted 130% and achievement
above assessment on level of
the pupils/students’ pupils/students
needs, abilities and per rating
learning styles. period/learning
 Pupils/students’ areas
portfolio contained  Journal of
130% and above of assessment,
his/her analysis per
accomplishments
rating period
 130% and above of the
pupils/students’ ratings
in all subject
areas/rating period
were entered in the
Class Progress Record.
 All kinds of Test were
130% and above
administered with
journals of analysis per
subject area/rating
period.
(4)
 115 - 129% of the
pupils/students’
progress were evaluated
and analyzed with
evidences
 Conducted 115-129%
assessment on the
pupils/students’ needs,
 abilities and learning
styles.
 Pupils/students’
portfolio contained 115-
129% and above of
his/her
accomplishments
 115-129% of the
pupils/students’ ratings
in all subject
areas/rating period
were entered in the
Class Progress Record.
 All kinds of Test were
115-129% administered
with journals of analysis
per subject area/rating
period.
(3)
 100 - 114% of the
pupils/students’
progress were evaluated
and analyzed with
evidences
 Conducted 100-114%
assessment on the
pupils/students’ needs,
abilities and learning
styles.
 Pupils/students’
portfolio contained 100-
114% and above of
his/her
accomplishments
 100-114% of the
pupils/students’ ratings
in all subject
 areas/rating period
were entered in the
Class Progress Record.
 All kinds of Test were
100-114% administered
with journals of analysis
per subject area/rating
period.
(2)
 51 - 99% of all testing
tools were administered
 Conducted 51-99%
assessment on the
pupils/students’ needs,
abilities and learning
styles.
 Pupils/students’
portfolio contained 51-
99% and above of
his/her
accomplishments
 51-99%% of the
pupils/students’ ratings
in all subject
areas/rating period
were entered in the
Class Progress Record.
 All kinds of Test were
51-99%% and above
administered with
journals of analysis per
subject area/rating
period.
(1)
 50% and below of all
testing tools were
administered
  Conducted 50%
assessment on the
pupils/students’ needs,
abilities and learning
styles.
 Pupils/students’
portfolio contained 51-
99% and above of
his/her
accomplishments
 51-99%% of the
pupils/students’ ratings
in all subject
areas/rating period
were entered in the
Class Progress Record.
 All kinds of Test were
51-99%% and above
administered with
journals of analysis per
subject area/rating
period.
2. Attained the 75% (5)
level of achievement  Class had attained
per subject area 130% and above level
of achievement with
evidences
(4)
 Class had attained 115 -
129% level of
achievement with
evidences
(3)j
 Class had attained 100 -
114% level of
achievement with
evidences
 (2)
 Class had attained 51 -
99% level of
achievement with
evidences
(1)
 Class had attained 50%
and below level of
achievement
Community 1. Conducted June 2014 – 25% (5)  PTA
Involvement regular/periodic March 2015  130% and above of the meetings/confer
Homeroom PTA set agreement during ences organized
meetings/conference meetings were  Academic
s following the accomplished with monitoring/Doc
Reduced Class Friday evidences. uments follow-
Program (4) up
 115 – 129% of the  Project/events/
agreements set during activities
meetings were initiated/undert
accomplished with aken
evidences.  Sets of visit to
(3) parents
 100 – 114% of the set  Pupils’ portfolio
agreements during containing
meetings were pupils’
accomplished with
achievement
evidences.
(2)
 59 – 99% of the set
agreements were
planned with minimal
accomplishment
(1)
 50% and below of the
set agreements were
planned of no results
presented.
 2. Visited parents of (5)
pupils/students  130% and above
needing academic accomplishments of sets
monitoring follow up visit to parents resulting
within the RPMS to productive results
cycle with evidences

(4)
 115 - 129%
accomplishments of sets
visit to parents with
partial success upon
implementation of
planned interventions
with evidence
(3)
 100-114%
accomplishments of sets
visit to parents with
minimal results of
planned interventions
with evidence
(2)
 51 - 99%
accomplishments of sets
visit to parents with
agreed planned
interventions with
evidences
(1)
 50% and below
accomplishments of sets
of visit to parents with
interventions
implemented

Professional 1.Participated/Atten June 2014 – 20% (5)  Seminars/

 Growth and ded Division/District March 2015  Participated/Attended Trainings attended
Development and school activities all activities launched by  Participated in
such as Teachers’ the Division/District and different school
Day Celebration, School as per year activities
Independence Day, round plan of activities
Team Building and throughout the RPMS
Others Cycle
(4)
 Participated/attended
activities launched by
the Division but missed
1 activities
(3)
 Participated/attended
activities launched by
the Division but missed
2 activities
(2)
 Participated/attended
activities launched by
the Division but missed
3 activities
(1)
 Participated/attended
activities launched by
the Division but missed
4 activities
*To get the score, the rating is multiplied by the weight
assigned  

MARY ANN FRANCIS A. BELTRAN

TEACHER I TERESITA M. RABUSA
HEAD TEACHER III
PRISCILLA F. ALVIOR
SCHOOL PRINCIPAL II