Scribd
Upload
52 views1 page

IBAA Vs Boromeo

Uploaded by

Eme
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
52 views1 page

IBAA Vs Boromeo

Uploaded by

Eme
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

Close Reader

SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 081

Information | Reference
Copy Selection
Case Title: Select some text within a
INSULAR BANK OF ASIA AND paragraph and click here to
AMERICA (FORMERLY FIRST copy the selected text. Citation
INSULAR BANK OF CEBU) and included.
GREGORIO J. WALWAL,
petitioners, vs. HON. ISIDRO C.
BORROMEO, Presiding Judge, CFI
of South Cotabato, Branch II,
VOL. 81, JANUARY 1
and CIRIACO JABIDO, 23, 1978
respondents.
Insular Bank of Asia and
Citation: 81 SCRA 167 America vs. Borromeo
More...

No. L-39037. January


*
23
Search Result 1978.

1. proceedings be set aside and INSULAR BANK OF AS


a new trial ordered. The
remedial measure need not go AND AMERI
that far. It would suffice that the (FORMERLY FIR
proceedings held on the date in
question be set aside, and INSULAR BANK OF CEB
thereafter the trial be conducted and GREGORIO
strictly in accordance with the
Rules of Court. So we decide.
WALWAL, petitioners,
The facts disclose, as noted, that HON. ISIDRO
due to the rather prolonged BORROMEO, Presid
absence of the respondent Judge
from his station in Marbel, Judge, CFI of Sou
Koronadal, South Cotabato, the Cotabato, Branch II, a
records of Civil Case No. 183
were transferred to Branch I of CIRIACO JABID
the Court of First Instance of respondents.
South Cotabato sitting at General
Santos City, where it was first
scheduled for trial on February 4,
1974. [2Petition, par. 2.] There Constitutional l
was a subsequent notification to Procedural due process; No
petitioners’ counsel
of hearing, concept of; Failur
notify a party or his counse
the change of venue of c
constitutes denial of procedu
due process.—To be m
precise, there was a disregard
the “indispensability of a no
for a hearing.” It is true that
time for the resumption of
trial was mutually agreed up
Notice to be meaningful,

______________

*SECOND DIVISION.

© Copyright 2020 Central Book Supply, Inc. All rights

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy