Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal

Elements of a Theoretical Framework for Public Sector Accounting

June Pallot,
Article information:
To cite this document:
June Pallot, (1992) "Elements of a Theoretical Framework for Public Sector Accounting", Accounting, Auditing &
Accountability Journal, Vol. 5 Issue: 1, https://doi.org/10.1108/09513579210008244
Permanent link to this document:
https://doi.org/10.1108/09513579210008244
Downloaded on: 08 June 2018, At: 08:30 (PT)
References: this document contains references to 0 other documents.
To copy this document: permissions@emeraldinsight.com
The fulltext of this document has been downloaded 4235 times since 2006*
Users who downloaded this article also downloaded:
(2008),"Public sector to public services: 20 years of “contextual” accounting research", Accounting, Auditing &
Accountability Journal, Vol. 21 Iss 2 pp. 129-169 <a href="https://doi.org/10.1108/09513570810854383">https://
Downloaded by University of Reading At 08:30 08 June 2018 (PT)

doi.org/10.1108/09513570810854383</a>
(1989),"Financial Accounting Knowledge, Conceptual Framework Projects and the Social Construction of the
Accounting Profession", Accounting, Auditing &amp; Accountability Journal, Vol. 2 Iss 2 pp. - <a href="https://
doi.org/10.1108/09513578910132268">https://doi.org/10.1108/09513578910132268</a>

Access to this document was granted through an Emerald subscription provided by emerald-srm:289728 []
For Authors
If you would like to write for this, or any other Emerald publication, then please use our Emerald for Authors service
information about how to choose which publication to write for and submission guidelines are available for all. Please visit
www.emeraldinsight.com/authors for more information.
About Emerald www.emeraldinsight.com
Emerald is a global publisher linking research and practice to the benefit of society. The company manages a portfolio of
more than 290 journals and over 2,350 books and book series volumes, as well as providing an extensive range of online
products and additional customer resources and services.
Emerald is both COUNTER 4 and TRANSFER compliant. The organization is a partner of the Committee on Publication
Ethics (COPE) and also works with Portico and the LOCKSS initiative for digital archive preservation.

*Related content and download information correct at time of download.

Downloaded by University of Reading At 08:30 08 June 2018 (PT)
Downloaded by University of Reading At 08:30 08 June 2018 (PT)
Downloaded by University of Reading At 08:30 08 June 2018 (PT)
Downloaded by University of Reading At 08:30 08 June 2018 (PT)
Downloaded by University of Reading At 08:30 08 June 2018 (PT)
Downloaded by University of Reading At 08:30 08 June 2018 (PT)
Downloaded by University of Reading At 08:30 08 June 2018 (PT)
Downloaded by University of Reading At 08:30 08 June 2018 (PT)
Downloaded by University of Reading At 08:30 08 June 2018 (PT)
Downloaded by University of Reading At 08:30 08 June 2018 (PT)
Downloaded by University of Reading At 08:30 08 June 2018 (PT)
Downloaded by University of Reading At 08:30 08 June 2018 (PT)
Downloaded by University of Reading At 08:30 08 June 2018 (PT)
Downloaded by University of Reading At 08:30 08 June 2018 (PT)
Downloaded by University of Reading At 08:30 08 June 2018 (PT)
Downloaded by University of Reading At 08:30 08 June 2018 (PT)
Downloaded by University of Reading At 08:30 08 June 2018 (PT)
Downloaded by University of Reading At 08:30 08 June 2018 (PT)
Downloaded by University of Reading At 08:30 08 June 2018 (PT)
Downloaded by University of Reading At 08:30 08 June 2018 (PT)
Downloaded by University of Reading At 08:30 08 June 2018 (PT)
Downloaded by University of Reading At 08:30 08 June 2018 (PT)
 This article has been cited by:

1. Oraphan Nakmahachalasint, Kanogporn Narktabtee. 2018. Implementation of accrual accounting in Thailand’s central
government. Public Money & Management 2, 1-10. [Crossref]
2. Silvana Karina de Melo Travassos, José Carlos de Lacerda Leite, Jose Isidio de Freitas Costa. 2018. Contingent Valuation
Method and the beta model: an accounting economic vision for environmental damage in Atlântico Sul Shipyard. Revista
Contabilidade & Finanças 29:77, 266-282. [Crossref]
3. OthmanRadiah, Radiah Othman, LaswadFawzi, Fawzi Laswad, NathNirmala, Nirmala Nath. 2017. Local councils’
environmental sustainability reporting: who really counts?. Pacific Accounting Review 29:4, 469-489. [Abstract] [Full Text]
[PDF]
4. GaiaSilvia, Silvia Gaia, John JonesMichael, Michael John Jones. 2017. UK local councils reporting of biodiversity values: a
stakeholder perspective. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 30:7, 1614-1638. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
5. Jane Andrew, Damien Cahill. 2017. Rationalising and resisting neoliberalism: The uneven geography of costs. Critical
Perspectives on Accounting 45, 12-28. [Crossref]
6. Tommaso Agasisti, Giuseppe Catalano, Angelo Erbacci. 2017. How Resistance to Change Affects the Implementation of
Accrual Accounting in Italian Public Universities: A Comparative Case Study. International Journal of Public Administration
12, 1-11. [Crossref]
7. Alexandre Rambaud, Jacques Richard. The “Triple Depreciation Line” Accounting Model and Its Application to the Human
Capital 225-252. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] [PDF]
8. Kerry Jacobs. 2016. Theorising Interdisciplinary Public Sector Accounting Research. Financial Accountability & Management
Downloaded by University of Reading At 08:30 08 June 2018 (PT)

32:4, 469-488. [Crossref]

9. Anthony Wall, Ciaran Connolly. 2016. Implementing IFRSs in the UK devolved administrations. Accounting, Auditing &
Accountability Journal 29:2, 198-225. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
10. Yuri Biondi. 2016. The HM ‘Treasure's Island’: The Application of Accruals-based Accounting Standards in the UK
Government. Accounting in Europe 13:1, 81-102. [Crossref]
11. Francesca Manes Rossi. Public Sector Accounting 1-13. [Crossref]
12. Cristina Silvia Nistor, Adela Deaconu. 2016. Public accounting history in post-communist Romania. Economic Research-
Ekonomska Istraživanja 29:1, 623-642. [Crossref]
13. Yulia Kasperskaya. Asset Management 1-10. [Crossref]
14. H. W. Lampe, D. Hilgers, C. Ihl. 2015. Does accrual accounting improve municipalities’ efficiency? Evidence from Germany.
Applied Economics 47:41, 4349-4363. [Crossref]
15. David Heald, Ron Hodges. 2015. Will “austerity” be a critical juncture in European public sector financial reporting?.
Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 28:6, 993-1015. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
16. Giuseppe Grossi, Ileana Steccolini. 2015. Pursuing Private or Public Accountability in the Public Sector? Applying IPSASs
to Define the Reporting Entity in Municipal Consolidation. International Journal of Public Administration 38:4, 325-334.
[Crossref]
17. Marco Bisogno, Serena Santis, Aurelio Tommasetti. 2015. Public-Sector Consolidated Financial Statements: An Analysis
of the Comment Letters on IPSASB’s Exposure Draft No. 49. International Journal of Public Administration 38:4, 311-324.
[Crossref]
18. Christine Ryan, Janet Mack, Stuart Tooley, Helen Irvine. 2014. Do Not-For-Profits Need Their Own Conceptual
Framework?. Financial Accountability & Management 30:4, 383-402. [Crossref]
19. Francesco Capalbo, Alex Frino, Vito Mollica, Riccardo Palumbo. 2014. Accrual-based earnings management in state owned
companies. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 27:6, 1026-1040. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
20. Lucia Biondi, Irvine Lapsley. 2014. Accounting, transparency and governance: the heritage assets problem. Qualitative Research
in Accounting & Management 11:2, 146-164. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
21. Lasse Oulasvirta. 2014. The reluctance of a developed country to choose International Public Sector Accounting Standards
of the IFAC. A critical case study. Critical Perspectives on Accounting 25:3, 272-285. [Crossref]
22. Natalia Aversano, Johan Christiaens. 2014. Governmental Financial Reporting of Heritage Assets From a User Needs
Perspective. Financial Accountability & Management 30:2, 150-174. [Crossref]
23. Lotta-Maria Sinervo. 2014. Interpreting financial balance in local government: a case study from Finland. Public Money &
Management 34:2, 123-130. [Crossref]
24. Silvia Gardini, Giuseppe Grossi. 2014. Voluntary adoption of the consolidated financial statement and fair value accounting by
italian local governments. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management 26:2, 313-344. [Abstract] [PDF]
 25. Prae Keerasuntonpong, Keitha Dunstan, Bhagwan Khanna. 2014. Examining statements of service performance: Evidence
from wastewater services in new zealand. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management 26:4, 614-642.
[Abstract] [PDF]
26. Egan Matthew. 2014. Making water count: water accountability change within an Australian university. Accounting, Auditing
& Accountability Journal 27:2, 259-282. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
27. Andreea Cîrstea. 2014. The Need for Public Sector Consolidated Financial Statements. Procedia Economics and Finance 15,
1289-1296. [Crossref]
28. Alessandro Lombrano, Luca Zanin. 2013. IPSAS and local government consolidated financial statements—proposal for a
territorial consolidation method. Public Money & Management 33:6, 429-436. [Crossref]
29. Nives Botica Redmayne, Fawzi Laswad. 2013. An Assessment of the Impact of IFRS Adoption on Public Sector Audit Fees
and Audit Effort - Some Evidence of the Transition Costs on Changes in Reporting Regimes. Australian Accounting Review
23:1, 88-99. [Crossref]
30. Johan Christiaens, Jan Rommel, Allan Barton, Patricia Everaert. 2012. Should all capital goods of governments be recognised
as assets in financial accounting?. Baltic Journal of Management 7:4, 429-443. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
31. Nola Buhr. 2012. Accrual accounting by Anglo-American governments: Motivations, developments, and some tensions over
the last 30 years. Accounting History 17:3-4, 287-309. [Crossref]
32. Yuri Biondi. 2012. Should Business and Non-Business Accounting be Different? A Comparative Perspective Applied to the
French Central Government Accounting Standards. International Journal of Public Administration 35:9, 603-619. [Crossref]
33. Lisa Evans, Bill Thornton, Janet Usinger. 2012. Theoretical Frameworks to Guide School Improvement. NASSP Bulletin
96:2, 154-171. [Crossref]
Downloaded by University of Reading At 08:30 08 June 2018 (PT)

34. Kathryn Trewavas, Nives Botica Redmayne, Fawzi Laswad. 2012. The Impact of IFRS Adoption on Public Sector Financial
Statements. Australian Accounting Review 22:1, 86-102. [Crossref]
35. Steven Toms, Matthias Beck, Darinka Asenova. 2011. Accounting, regulation and profitability: The case of PFI hospital
refinancing. Critical Perspectives on Accounting 22:7, 668-681. [Crossref]
36. Huguette Blanco, John Lennard, Sylvain Lamontagne. 2011. Annual Reporting and Accountability by Municipalities in
Canada: An Empirical Investigation*. Accounting Perspectives 10:3, 195-224. [Crossref]
37. Berit Adam, Riccardo Mussari, Rowan Jones. 2011. THE DIVERSITY OF ACCRUAL POLICIES IN LOCAL
GOVERNMENT FINANCIAL REPORTING: AN EXAMINATION OF INFRASTRUCTURE, ART AND
HERITAGE ASSETS IN GERMANY, ITALY AND THE UK. Financial Accountability & Management 27:2, 107-133.
[Crossref]
38. Noel Hyndman, Ciaran Connolly. 2011. Accruals accounting in the public sector: A road not always taken. Management
Accounting Research 22:1, 36-45. [Crossref]
39. Stephen J. Bailey, Darinka Asenova, John Hood, Melina Maria Manochin. 2010. An Exploratory Study of the Utilisation of
the UK’s Prudential Borrowing Framework. Public Policy and Administration 25:4, 347-363. [Crossref]
40. Michael John Jones. 2010. Accounting for the environment: Towards a theoretical perspective for environmental accounting
and reporting. Accounting Forum 34:2, 123-138. [Crossref]
41. Brian West, Garry D. Carnegie. 2010. Accounting's chaotic margins. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 23:2,
201-228. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
42. Jean Shaoul, Anne Stafford, Pam Stapleton. 2010. Financial black holes. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 23:2,
229-255. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] [Supplemental Material]
43. Grant Samkin, Annika Schneider. 2010. Accountability, narrative reporting and legitimation. Accounting, Auditing &
Accountability Journal 23:2, 256-289. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
44. Michela Arnaboldi, Irvine Lapsley. 2009. On the Implementation of Accrual Accounting: A Study of Conflict and Ambiguity.
European Accounting Review 18:4, 809-836. [Crossref]
45. Umesh Sharma, Stewart Lawrence. 2009. Global remedies for local needs. Pacific Accounting Review 21:3, 260-285. [Abstract]
[Full Text] [PDF]
46. Robyn Pilcher. 2009. Deconstructing local government performance and infrastructure measurement. Asian Review of
Accounting 17:2, 163-176. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
47. Giuseppe Grossi. 2009. New development: Consolidated financial reporting as a stimulus for change in Italian local
government. Public Money & Management 29:4, 261-264. [Crossref]
48. Giuseppe Grossi, Susan Newberry, Andreas Bergmann, Daniel Bietenhader, Torbjörn Tagesson, Johan Christiaens, Philippe
Van Cauwenberge, Jan Rommel. 2009. Theme: Whole of government accounting— international trends. Public Money &
Management 29:4, 209-218. [Crossref]
 49. Jane Broadbent, James Guthrie. 2008. Public sector to public services: 20 years of “contextual” accounting research. Accounting,
Auditing & Accountability Journal 21:2, 129-169. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
50. Johan Christiaens, Jan Rommel. 2008. ACCRUAL ACCOUNTING REFORMS: ONLY FOR BUSINESSLIKE (PARTS
OF) GOVERNMENTS. Financial Accountability & Management 24:1, 59-75. [Crossref]
51. E.J. Buch Gómez, R. Cabaleiro Casal. 2008. “HERITAGE ASSETS” E INFRAESTRUCTURAS PÚBLICAS: ¿CÓMO,
DÓNDE Y POR CUÁNTO?. Investigaciones Europeas de Dirección y Economía de la Empresa 14:1, 103-116. [Crossref]
52. MARK CHRISTENSEN. 2007. What We Might Know (But Aren't Sure) About Public-Sector Accrual Accounting.
Australian Accounting Review 17:43, 51-65. [Crossref]
53. Sheila Ellwood, Susan Newberry. 2007. Public sector accrual accounting: institutionalising neo‐liberal principles?. Accounting,
Auditing & Accountability Journal 20:4, 549-573. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
54. Bernardino Benito, Isabel Brusca, Vicente Montesinos. 2007. The harmonization of government financial information systems:
the role of the IPSASs. International Review of Administrative Sciences 73:2, 293-317. [Crossref]
55. Monir Zaman Mir, Abu Shiraz Rahaman. 2007. Accounting and public sector reforms. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability
Journal 20:2, 237-268. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
56. MARK CHRISTENSEN. 2007. What We Might Know (But Aren't Sure) About Public-Sector Accrual Accounting.
Australian Accounting Review 17:41, 51-65. [Crossref]
57. Susan Newberry, June Pallot. 2005. A Wolf in Sheep's Clothing? Wider Consequences of the Financial Management System
of the New Zealand Central Government. Financial Accountability and Management 21:3, 263-277. [Crossref]
58. Allan Barton. 2005. Professional Accounting Standards and the Public Sector-a Mismatch. Abacus 41:2, 138-158. [Crossref]
59. Irvine Lapsley. 2005. June Pallot: from architect to accountant. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 18:1, 160-163.
Downloaded by University of Reading At 08:30 08 June 2018 (PT)

[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

60. Susan Newberry. 2005. June Pallot: contribution to New Zealand public policy debate. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability
Journal 18:1, 164-167. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
61. Richard Laughlin. 2005. In memory of Professor June Pallot. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 18:1, 168-170.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
62. Mark Christensen. 2005. The ‘third hand’: Private sector consultants in public sector accounting change. European Accounting
Review 14:3, 447-474. [Crossref]
63. Johan Christiaens *. 2004. Capital assets in governmental accounting reforms: comparing Flemish technical issues with
international standards. European Accounting Review 13:4, 743-770. [Crossref]
64. Allan D. Barton. 2004. How to Profit From Defence: A Study in the Misapplication of Business Accounting to the Public
Sector in Australia. Financial Accountability and Management 20:3, 281-304. [Crossref]
65. Michael John Jones. 2003. Accounting for biodiversity: operationalising environmental accounting. Accounting, Auditing &
Accountability Journal 16:5, 762-789. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
66. Vicente Pina, Lourdes Torres. 2003. Reshaping Public Sector Accounting: An International Comparative View. Canadian
Journal of Administrative Sciences / Revue Canadienne des Sciences de l'Administration 20:4, 334-350. [Crossref]
67. Ram Karan. 2003. Selective Commercialisation of Public-Sector Accounting and its Consequences for Public Accountability.
Australian Accounting Review 13:31, 15-25. [Crossref]
68. Mark Christensen. 2003. Without ‘Reinventing the Wheel’: Business Accounting Applied to the Public Sector. Australian
Accounting Review 13:31, 22-27. [Crossref]
69. Susan Newberry, June Pallot. 2003. Fiscal (ir)responsibility: privileging PPPs in New Zealand. Accounting, Auditing &
Accountability Journal 16:3, 467-492. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
70. Mark Christensen. 2003. Without `Reinventing the Wheel‘: Business Accounting Applied to the Public Sector. Australian
Accounting Review 13:30, 22-27. [Crossref]
71. Sheila Ellwood. 2003. Bridging the GAAP across the UK public sector. Accounting and Business Research 33:2, 105-121.
[Crossref]
72. Johan Christiaens, Els De Wielemaker. 2003. Financial Accounting Reform in Flemish Universities: An Empirical Study of
the Implementation. Financial Accountability and Management 19:2, 185-204. [Crossref]
73. Mark Christensen. 2002. Accrual accounting in the public sector: the case of the New South Wales government. Accounting
History 7:2, 93-124. [Crossref]
74. Allan D. Barton. 2000. Accounting for public heritage facilities – assets or liabilities of the government?. Accounting, Auditing
& Accountability Journal 13:2, 219-236. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
75. George D. Thompson. 1999. Cultural capital and accounting. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 12:4, 394-412.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
 76. Karen A. Van Peursem. 1999. A theory of public health sector report: forging a new path. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability
Journal 12:4, 413-440. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
77. David Coy, Michael Pratt. 1998. An insight into accountability and politics in universities: a case study. Accounting, Auditing
& Accountability Journal 11:5, 540-561. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
78. Patricia Stanton, John Stanton. 1998. The questionable economics of governmental accounting. Accounting, Auditing &
Accountability Journal 11:2, 191-203. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
79. Roger L Burritt, Stephen Welch. 1997. Accountability for environmental performance of the Australian Commonwealth public
sector. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 10:4, 532-561. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
80. P.J. Stanton, P.A. Stanton. 1997. Governmental accounting for heritage assets: economic, social implications. International
Journal of Social Economics 24:7/8/9, 988-1006. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
81. Abu Shiraz Abdul‐Rahaman, Sonja Gallhofer, Jim Haslam, Stewart Lawrence. 1997. Public Sector Accounting and Financial
Management in Developing Countries: A Critical Assessment of the Literature. Asian Review of Accounting 5:2, 38-65.
[Abstract] [PDF]
82. David G. Woodward, Pam Edwards, Frank Birkin. 1996. Organizational Legitimacy and Stakeholder Information Provision1.
British Journal of Management 7:4, 329-347. [Crossref]
83. Peter Young. 1994. Market Valuation with No Market – Valuing Properties with Little Evidence. Journal of Property Valuation
and Investment 12:3, 9-27. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
84. Cristian Carini, Claudio Teodori. Potential Uses and Usefulness of Italian Local Government Consolidated Financial Reporting
68-89. [Crossref]
85. Tarek Rana. New Public Management Reforms and Modernization Changes in Australia 1-17. [Crossref]
Downloaded by University of Reading At 08:30 08 June 2018 (PT)