Sample Commissioning Spec Aec
Sample Commissioning Spec Aec
projects for new and existing schools. The sample document was provided to
Adams 12 Five Star Schools by Architectural Energy Corporation
www.archenergy.com. Modify the document to meet your requirements. For
further information, contact Jack Dempsey 720-972-4340, email
jack.dempsey@adams12.org
Commissioning Specification
Introduction
PART 1 - GENERAL
1.0X Commissioning
PART 1 - GENERAL
PART 1- GENERAL
1.0X Commissioning
PART 1- GENERAL
1.0X Summary
A. Prior to notifying the architect that the project is complete according to the
construction and contract documents, the Contractor shall submit to the
Architect:
PART 1- GENERAL
1.0X Summary
1.0X Schedule
PART 3 EXECUTION
A. Content and Format. List specific content and format requirements for
operations and maintenance manuals in this section.
01810 Commissioning
PART 1 - GENERAL
1.1 Summary
1.2 Coordination
B. Management.
Define the management and contractual model for the commissioning provider.
The CP is typically under contract with the owner, but commissioning can also
be provided under management by the design team or general contractor.
1. Scoping Meeting. All members of the design and construction team that will be
involved in the commissioning process meet and agree on the scope of work,
tasks, schedules, deliverables, and responsibilities for implementation of the
Commissioning Plan.
2. Commissioning Plan. The commissioning plan provides guidance in the
execution of the commissioning process. The Specifications take precedence
over the Commissioning Plan.
3. Submittals. Equipment documentation is submitted to the CP during normal
submittals, including detailed start-up procedures.
4. Start-Up/Pre-Functional Checklists. The CP works with the Subs to develop
startup plans and documentation formats, including providing the Subs with pre-
functional checklists to be completed during the startup process.
5. Functional Performance Testing . The CP develops specific equipment and
system functional performance test procedures. The Subs review the
procedures. The procedures are executed by the Subs, under the direction of,
and documented by the CP.
6. Deficiencies and Resolution . The CP documents items of non-compliance in
materials, installation or operation. The items are corrected at the Sub’s
expense and the equipment or systems are retested.
7. Operations and Maintenance Documentation . The CP reviews the O&M
documentation for completeness.
8. Training. The CP reviews and coordinates the training provided by the Subs and
verifies that it is completed.
9. Seasonal Testing. Deferred or seasonal testing is conducted, as required.
1.5 RESPONSIBILITIES
Warranty Period
Coordinate and supervise required seasonal or deferred testing and
deficiency corrections.
Assist in the development of a preventative maintenance plan and review as-
built documentation.
Warranty Period
Ensure that any seasonal or deferred testing and any deficiency issues are
addressed.
Warranty Period
Ensure that Subs execute required seasonal or deferred functional
performance testing.
Ensure that Subs correct deficiencies and make necessary adjustments to
O&M manuals and as-built drawings for issues identified during the warranty
period.
Warranty Period
Execute seasonal or deferred functional performance testing, as necessary.
Correct deficiencies and make necessary adjustments to O&M manuals and
as-built drawings for issues identified during the warranty period.
H. Equipment Suppliers
A. All standard testing equipment required to perform startup and initial checkout
and required functional performance testing shall be provided by the Division
contractor for the equipment being tested.
PART 3 - EXECUTION
3.1 MEETINGS
3.2 REPORTING
B. The CP will regularly communicate with all members of the commissioning team,
apprising them of commissioning progress and scheduling changes through
memos, progress reports, etc.
B. The CP may submit written requests for additional information from contractors
to facilitate the commissioning process.
C. The CP may request additional design and operations narrative from the design
team and Controls Contractor.
1. Subs and equipment suppliers schedule startup and checkout with the PM,
GC and CP.
2. The CP shall observe, at minimum, the start-up procedures for each piece of
primary equipment. If there are multiple units, a sampling strategy may be used
according to the commissioning plan.
1. The Subs shall clearly list any items of the start-up and pre-functional
procedures not successfully completed at the bottom of the form or on an
attached sheet. The procedures form and any outstanding deficiencies are
provided to the CP within two days of test completion.
2. The CP reviews and verifies all pre-functional inspection checklists and start-
up reports and recommends approval to the PM. The CP assists the Subs and
vendors to correct and retest deficiencies or uncompleted items, involving other
members of the commissioning team as necessary.
The test procedure forms developed by the CP shall include the following
information:
A. Documentation.
The CP witnesses and documents the results of all functional performance tests
using forms developed for that purpose. Prior to testing, these forms are
provided to the PM for review and approval.
B. Non-Conformance.
1. The CP records the results of the functional test on the procedure or test
form. All deficiencies identified during the verification testing are documented on
a standard form and reported to the project manager, contractors, and sub-
contractors. The deficiency report includes all details of the components or
systems found to be non-compliant with the parameters of the test plans. The
report details the adjustments or alterations required to correct system operation,
and identifies the responsible party.
2. Corrections of minor deficiencies identified may be made during the tests at
the discretion of the CP. In such cases the deficiency and resolution will be
documented on the procedure form.
3. Every effort will be made to expedite the testing process and minimize
unnecessary delays, while not compromising the integrity of the procedures.
4. For identified deficiencies:
C. Cost of Retesting
1. The cost for the Sub to retest a pre-functional or functional test, if they are
responsible for the deficiency, shall be theirs. If they are not responsible, any
cost recovery for retesting costs shall be negotiated with the GC.
2. The time for the CP and PM to direct any retesting because a specific pre-
functional checklist or start-up test item, reported to have been successfully
completed, but determined during functional testing to be faulty, will be
backcharged to the GC.
D. Approval.
The CP makes formal approval of the functional performance test after review.
The CP recommends acceptance of each test to the PM. The PM gives final
approval on each test.
A. Unforeseen Deferred Tests. If any test cannot be completed due to the building
structure, required occupancy condition, or other deficiency, the functional
testing may be delayed upon approval of the PM. These tests are conducted in
the same manner as the seasonal tests as soon as possible.
PART 1- GENERAL
1.0X Summary
PART 3 EXECUTION
PART 1- GENERAL
1.0X Summary
PART 1 - GENERAL
1.0X Commissioning
Division 16 — Electrical
PART 1 - GENERAL
1.0X Commissioning