Scribd
Upload
85 views3 pages

How To Measure Polymer's Apparent Melt Density Using A Melt Indexer

The document describes how to measure a polymer's apparent melt density using a melt indexer that performs both Method A and Method B tests. Method A measures mass melt flow rate by weighing extrudate samples, while Method B measures volumetric melt flow rate. By equating the rates from the two methods and solving for density, an apparent melt density is obtained. This value allows Method B tests to approximate Method A results without manual cutting/weighing. The apparent density accounts for test conditions but not minor real-world factors, so it may differ from the true density. The value also depends on temperature and additives.

Uploaded by

AHMED YOUSEF
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
85 views3 pages

How To Measure Polymer's Apparent Melt Density Using A Melt Indexer

The document describes how to measure a polymer's apparent melt density using a melt indexer that performs both Method A and Method B tests. Method A measures mass melt flow rate by weighing extrudate samples, while Method B measures volumetric melt flow rate. By equating the rates from the two methods and solving for density, an apparent melt density is obtained. This value allows Method B tests to approximate Method A results without manual cutting/weighing. The apparent density accounts for test conditions but not minor real-world factors, so it may differ from the true density. The value also depends on temperature and additives.

Uploaded by

AHMED YOUSEF
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 3

How to Measure Polymer`s Apparent Melt Density using a Melt Indexer

Azadeh Farahanchi, Rheological Scientist, Ph.D


07.09.2019
Method A/B is a test that can be performed in a melt flow rate tester in order to calculate the value of
the polymer`s melt density at a specific temperature. In a method A/B test, both a “method A” test and
“method B” test are performed on the same charge of material. The melt flow rate derived from
method A, is equated to the method B flow equation and solved for apparent melt density. The value
in doing this test is obtaining a valid apparent melt density which can later be used in a solo method B
test (there is no manual cuts of extrudate or weighing in method B) to achieve results equivalent to
method A (operator must make manual cuts and weigh sample in method A).
The mass melt flow rate from Method A is calculated based on the mass of the extrudate(s) as
equation below:

Where (g) is the mass in grams of material collected over time (sec). The value of “600” is taken into
account in order to convent the unit of MFR to g/10 min

Mass measurement of MFR using a Dynisco LMI5500 series

The melt volume flow rate (MVR) from Method B is calculated as equation below
Where R is standard piston radios (R= 0.477 cm), tB is the time of the piston travel for a distance.
Based on ASTM D1238 can be set to be 0.635 +/- 0.025 cm or 2.540 +/- 0.025 cm measuring range
depending on the expected MFR of the samples. The value of “600” is taken into account in order to
convent the unit of MVR to cm3/10min

Volumetric displacement measurement of MVR using a Dynisco LMI5500

The ratio of the two values (MFR from Method A and MVR from Method B) is a measure of the melt
density of the polymer in g/cm3 as below

Figure 1 shows the results for apparent melt density for two different EVA materials using a Dynisco
LMI series melt indexer (test temperature: 190 C, weight: 2.16 kg). For this test 3 cutes were
collected within 1 minute time interval for Method A part as well as acquiring 3 flags with flag length of
6.35 mm for Method B part.
Fig. 1. Apparent melt density results from Dynisco LMI series.

This apparent melt density definition forces the two test methods to agree. It is called an “apparent”
melt density since it is actually a correlation coefficient which forces Method A and Method B to
agree. If there were no leakage past the plunger tip and the extrudate were bubble free and few other
minor factors were taken into consideration, then a true melt density could be assessed. This
apparent melt density value can be used for Method B tests to obtain MFR values without manual
cutting and weighing of the samples. Please note that the melt density of the polymer is a function of
temperature. Also, fillers, reinforcing agent. Etc. tend to change the melt density of the material.

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy