Consti 2 Syllabus-1-1
Consti 2 Syllabus-1-1
CONSTITUTIONAL LAW II
SYLLABUS
nd
2 Semester 2018-2019
Introduction:
1. Due Process
1
Lumiqued v. Exevea, 282 SCRA 125 (1997)
PHILCOMSAT v. Alcuaz, 180 SCRA 218 (2 Bernas 8)
Ateneo v. Court of Appeals, 145 SCRA 106
Goldberg v. Kelly, 397 U.S. 254 (1970)
U.P. v. Hon. Ligot-Telan, 227 SCRA 342
Estrada v. Sandiganbayan, 369 SCRA 394 (19 November 2001)
People v. Nazario, 165 SCRA 186 (2 Bernas 16)
Agustin v. Edu, 88 SCRA 195 (2 Bernas 43)
Olmstead v. U.S. (Brandeis dissent), 277 U.S. 438
Griswold v. Connecticut, 381 U.S. 479 (1965)
Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973)
Ople v. Torres, 141 SCRA 293
People v. Fajardo, 100 Phil. 443 (2 Bernas 639)
Ynot v. Court of Appeals, 148 SCRA 659 (2 Bernas 21)
Bel-Air Association v. IAC, 176 SCRA 719
EPZA v. Dulay, 149 SCRA 305 (2 Bernas 655)
De Knecht v. Bautista, 100 SCRA 660 (2 Bernas 666)
Manotok v. NHA, 150 SCRA 89 (2 Bernas 674)
Sumulong v. Guerrero, 154 SCRA 461 (2 Bernas 650)
Luz Famrs v. Secretary, 192 SCRA 51 (2 Bernas 1011)
Cariday v. CA (Gutierrez J., dissenting), 176 SCRA 31
2. Equal Protection
2
Alih v. Castro, 151 SCRA 279 (1987)
Nolasco v. Pano, 139 SCRA 152 (1987); 147 SCRA 509 (1987)
People v. Malmstedt, 198 SCRA 401 (1991)
People v. Burgos, 144 SCRA 1 (1986)
Almeida-Sanchez v. U.S., 413 U.S. 266 (1973)
Delaware v. Prouse, 440 U.S. 648 (1979)
Valmonte v. De Villa, 178 SCRA 211 (1989); 185 SCRA 665 (1990)
In re: Umil et al v. Ramos, 187 SCRA 311 (1990); 202 SCRA 251 (1991)
Manalili v. CA, 280 SCRA 400 (1997)
Malacat v. CA, 283 SCRA 159 (1997)
David et al v. Macapagal-Arroyo, 489 SCRA 160 (2006)
Babst v. NIB, 132 SCRA 316 (1984)
IV. RIGHTS OF THE ACCUSED (SECS 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 19, 21)
3
Dela Camara v. Enage, 41 SCRA 1 (1971)
Tolentino v. Camano, 322 SCRA 559 (2000)
Enrile v. Perez, G.R. No. 147785, Resolution of the Court En Banc on May 5,
2001
People v. Sandiganbayan, 491 SCRA 185 (2006)
Bulaong v. People, 17 SCRA 746 (1966)
People v. Relova, 148 SCRA 292 (1987)
Melo v. People, 85 Phil 766 (1960)
4
Reno v. ACLU, 117 S. Ct. 2329; 138 L. Ed. 2d 874 (1997)
Chaplinski v. New Hampshire, 315 U.S. 568 (1942)
Cohen v. California, 403 U.S. 15 (1971)
R.A.V. v. St. Paul, 112 S. Ct. 2538 (1992)
U.S v. Bustos, 37 Phil 731 (1918)
Mutuc v. COMELEC, 36 SCRA 228 (1971)
Tinker v. Des Moines School District, 393 U.S. 503 (1969)
Near v. Minnesora, 283 U.S. 697 (19_1)
Grosjean v. American Press Co., 297 U.S. 233 (1936)
NY Times v. U.S., _0 U.S. 713 (1971)
Ginzburg v. U.S. 363 U.S. 463 (1966)
Miller v. California, 413 U.S. 15 (1973)
NY Times v. Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254 (1964)
Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc., 418 U.S. 323 (1974)
Vasquez v. Court of Appeals, 314 SCRA 46 (1999)
Phils. Journalists, Inc. v. Thoenen, 477 (SCRA 482 (2005)
Newsweek Inc. v. IAC, 142 SCRA 171 (1986)
In Re Jurado, 142 SCRA 171 (1986)
Eastern Broadcasting v. Dans, 157 SCRA 647 (1988)
Gonzales v. Kalaw-Katigbak, 137 SCRA 717 (1985)
MTRCB v. ABS-CBN Broadcasting Corp., 448 SCRA 575 (2005)
NAACP v. Alabama, 357 U.S. 449 (1958)
German v. Barangan, 135 SCRA 514 (1985)
Reyes v. Bagatsing, 125 SCRA 553 (1983)
Navarro v. Villegas, 31 SCRA 731 (1968)
Malabana, v. Ramento, 129 SCRA 359 (1984)
People v. Ferrer, 48 SCRA 382 (1972)
Yates v. U.S., 354 U.S. 298 (1957)
5
XI. EMINENT DOMAIN