DESCRIPTIVE STATISTICS

Exercise No: 1

MEASURES OF CENTRAL TENDENCY

OUTPUT:

Output for Median

Output for Mode

Output for Average

Exercise No: 2
MEASURES OF VARIABILITY

OUTPUT:

Quartiles:
Standard Deviation:

Correlation:
Exercise No: 3
MEASURES OF SHAPE

OUTPUT:

Output for Skew:

Output for Kurtosis:
Exercise No: 4
DESCRIPTIVE STATISTICS USING SPSS

OUTPUT:
Exercise No: 5
INDEPENDENT T- TEST USING SPSS

.
OUTPUT
Exercise No: 6
ONE-WAY ANOVA USING SPSS

OUTPUT:

Descriptives
Skills Fully Used
95% Confidence Interval for
Mean Minimu Maximu
N Mean Std. Deviation Std. Error Lower Bound Upper Bound m m
18-25 yrs 7 4.43 .535 .202 3.93 4.92 4 5
26-40 yrs 74 3.80 1.110 .129 3.54 4.05 1 5
41-50 yrs 46 3.89 1.059 .156 3.58 4.21 1 5
51-58 yrs 5 3.40 1.342 .600 1.73 5.07 2 5
Total 132 3.85 1.081 .094 3.66 4.03 1 5

ANOVA
Skills Fully Used
Sum of
Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
Between Groups 3.639 3 1.213 1.040 .377
Within Groups 149.330 128 1.167
Total 152.970 131

HYPOTHESIS NON- PARAMETRIC TEST

Exercise No: 7

FRIEDMAN’ S TEST

OUTPUT:

The Ranks table shows the mean rank for each of the related groups, as shown below:

The Test Statistics table informs you of the actual result of the Friedman test, and whether there
was an overall statistically significant difference between the mean ranks of your related groups.
The table looks as follows:

Inference:
Thus, a statistically significant difference in perceived effort depends on, χ2(2) = 7.600,
p= 0.022.
Exercise No: 8
KRUSKAL - WALLIS (KW) TEST
OUTPUT:

Inference
A statistically significant difference between the different drug treatments (H(2) = 8.520,
p = 0.014), with a mean rank of 35.33 for Drug A, 34.83 for Drug B and 21.35 for Drug C.

Exercise No: 9
MANN WHITNEY U TEST
OUTPUT:

Inference:
Thus, the cholesterol concentration in the diet group was statistically significantly higher
than the exercise group (U = 110, p = .014).

Exercise No: 10
 SPSS - CHI-SQUARE TEST

OUTPUT:

Exercise No: 11
WILCOXON SIGNED RANK TEST
OUTPUT:

Inference:

Thus, there is no relationship between the two variables. A statistically significant value Z
= -1.807, p = 0.071. H0 is accepted.

CORRELATION AND REGRESSION USING SPSS

Exercise No: 12
PEARSON’S CORRELATION

OUTPUT:

Inference:

Thus the variables are chosen for analysis and found that the Correlation is significant at
the 0.01 level (2-tailed).

Exercise No: 13
 RANK CORRELATION

OUTPUT:
Correlations

High Long
Jump Jump Shot Put
Spearman's rho High Jump Correlation
1.000 .850(**) -.450
Coefficient
Sig. (2-tailed) . .004 .224
N 9 9 9
Long Jump Correlation
.850(**) 1.000 -.433
Coefficient
Sig. (2-tailed) .004 . .244
N 9 9 9
Shot Put Correlation
-.450 -.433 1.000
Coefficient
Sig. (2-tailed) .224 .244 .
N 9 9 9

** Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).

Inference:

From the above output, we infer that there is a high positive correlation between the
positions obtained by the athletes in High Jump and Long Jump. It is statistically significant at
0.01 levels. There is a negative correlation between the positions obtained by the athletes in Long
Jump and Shot-put.

Exercise No: 14
 LINEAR REGRESSION
OUTPUT:

Exercise No: 15
 MULTIPLE REGRESSIONS

OUTPUT:

Statistical significance

Estimated model coefficients

This is obtained from the Coefficients table, as shown below:

Statistical significance of the independent variables

FORECASTING USING SPSS

Exercise No: 16

TIME SERIES DATA

Exercise No: 17
 AUTO REGRESSION

Aim:

OUTPUT:

Exercise No: 18
 PORTFOLIO SELECTION

OUTPUT:

Microsoft Excel 12.0 Sensitivity Report

Adjustable Cells
    Final Reduced Objective Allowable Allowable
Cell Name Value Cost Coefficient Increase Decrease
Gold in
$D$3 portfolio 0.916666667 0 0.02 1E+30 0.005
Mutual fund
$D$4 in portfolio 0 -0.008333333 0.01 0.008333333 1E+30
Share in
$D$5 portfolio 0 -0.003333333 0.01 0.003333333 1E+30

Constraints
    Final Shadow Constraint Allowable Allowable
Cell Name Value Price R.H. Side Increase Decrease
$G$6 in portfolio 1.1 0.016666667 1.1 1E+30 1.1

RISK AND SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS USING EXCEL

Exercise No: 19
CALCULATION OF PRESENT VALUE

 =PV (12%, 10,-1200, 0, 0)  

OUTPUT:

Exercise No: 20
 CALCULATION OF NET PRESENT VALUE

OUTPUT:

XFormul
a Description (Result)
Net present value of this investment
(1,188.44)
Exercise No: 21

RISK ANALYSIS USING SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS

OUTPUT:

Project X Project Y

Expected cash inflows PV NPV PV NPV

Worst 45636 5636 Nil (Rs.40000)
Most-likely 60848 20848 60848 20848
Best 76060 36060 121696 81696

REVENUE MANAGEMENT USING TORA

Exercise No: 22
 LINEAR PROGRAMMING PROBLEM - MINIMIZATION

OUTPUT:

Exercise No: 23

LINEAR PROGRAMMING PROBLEMS - MAXIMIZATION

OUTPUT:

TRANSPORTATION & ASSIGNMENT MODEL USING TORA

Exercise No: 24
TRANSPORTATION PROBLEM
OUTPUT:

Exercise No: 25
ASSIGNMENT PROBLEM
OUTPUT:

Objective value is 470.00

Exercise No: 26
NETWORKING MODELS USING TORA

OUTPUT:
Forward pass completed – Earliest time 21
Earliest Start - 18

CPM Bar chart

 QUEUING THEORY USING TORA
Exercise No: 27
 QUEUING MODELS – SINGLE SCENARIO

OUTPUT:

Exercise No: 28
 QUEUING MODELS – COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

OUTPUT:

Exercise No: 29
 INVENTORY MODELS USING EXCEL.

OUTPUT: