Contents

Introduction 4

Chapter 1. Contracts. General characteristics and types 7

1.1. English of documents’ writing 7
1.2. Theoretical problems of the language of documents 13
1.3. The structure of contract and its essential clauses 15
1.4. Types of contracts. Abbreviation 19

Chapter 2. Linguistic peculiarities of contract 23

2.1. Contract as a type of text and its stylistic characteristics 23
2.2. Grammatical peculiarities of contract 26
2.3. Lexical peculiarities of contract 32

Conclusion 38

References 42
 Introduction

The interest to the problem of drawing up contracts is not occasional. Nowadays

more and more people are getting involved in the world of business relationships. As
a result of it, business people need specialists possessing knowledge of the English
language used for writing documents.
Any serious deal should be struck with the help of contracts and agreements. A
written form of agreements is a guarantee that different people, for example Buyers
and Sellers, will cooperate in accordance with a certain business strategy, and their
interests will be taken into consideration by their partners.
A contract makes clear such things as quantity and quality of goods, their prices,
delivery terms, order of payment, and other terms. Contract serves to make a
business operation smooth and logic. It also proves seriousness of contracting parties
and defines their responsibilities before each other. An honest word of a
businessman, as well, should be reflected in a contract of a different kind. It is called
intentions agreement and is a manifestation of a wish to do business. That is, every
step and stage of a business deal should be supported in a legal way, in an official
form.
The chosen problem has appeared to be very urgent, because linguistics lacks its
precise description. There is a clear-cut between formal and informal styles of
English, but there is no strict difference between spoken and written business
English. Obviously, businessmen do not communicate with their companions using
intricate phrases and bookish words. Still, they are obliged to use some formal
clichés which may sound strange to non-business people, but are essential for
conducting business. Anyway, in the research we have been trying to investigate the
written part of business procedure, and to analyse texts of contracts considering their
specific peculiarities.
Another thing to be mentioned is that there are very few scientific researches
devoted to the problem of drawing up business documents. As a result of it, theory
of writing business papers, on the one hand, reflects highly subjective approaches.
On the other hand, such approaches are not unified in accordance with existing rules
of formal English which is also greatly influenced by informal English. Such
influence really exists, but there are no accepted criteria about what changes should
be taken into consideration. That is why people who draw up contracts suffer quite
understandable problems: How should they do it to sound correct in the foreign
language? To what degree should they be formal in the text of contract, if even
English-speaking people meet difficulties of a special kind in drawing a line between
formal and informal English? However, these problems are side problems of making
up contracts here.
The object of the research, thus, is a contract as a part of a business deal and a
type of written business English. Its subject comprises investigation of linguistic
peculiarities of a contract which make technique of its writing obligatory for people
involved in drawing up business documents.
The purpose of the research is to investigate peculiarities in texts of contracts. It is
performed through comprehension, interpretation and analysis of contractual
essential clauses, all of them illustrated by examples from texts of contracts.
The solution of the aim claims for doing away with a number of certain tasks,
such as:
1. to point out main features of formal English as the language of business
correspondence;
2. to describe the structure of contract and to single out its main clauses which are
characteristic of this type of documents;
3. to expose peculiarities of contract dividing them into three general groups of
stylistic, grammatical and lexical peculiarities.
In order to solve these tasks the author of the research has used methods of
studying and analysis of theoretical literature and practical manuals on the problem;
the methods of observation, description, means of syntactic and semantic analyses.
 The research has been performed in four interrelated steps. Analysis of literature
on the problem has logically been the first stage. After it, theoretical basis of the
research has been compiled. Then the author has picked up examples illustrating
grammatical, lexical and stylistic peculiarities of contracts. At last, generalisation of
results of the research and drawing up final conclusions have been performed.
In fact, linguistic peculiarities of contracts in comparison with their structure and
functioning in the business world have not been investigated thoroughly enough yet.
There are either economic papers on forms and types of contracts, or linguistic
researches on stylistic peculiarities of formal English. To state a connection between
those kinds of data and make links between them describing texts of contracts and to
analyse their distinguishing features are the main factors of scientific novelty of the
research.
The practical significance of the research is in possible application of its results in
practice by people who are interested in drawing up contracts and in the way of
doing it correctly. It can be also be of an interest for people studying problems of
style in English and functional usage of formal and informal styles. The results of
the research can be taken into consideration by students and instructors of English
and English stylistics. As well they can be used as material for special courses on
business English for students of linguistic and economic departments.
The examples for analysis have been selected by the method of overwhelming
excerption from texts of contracts dated different years. This fact can be a basis for
comparison of linguistic devices used in them. In order to make analysis of examples
more precise, the author has used data not only of linguistic, but those ones of
economic dictionaries as well.
The structure of the research includes introduction, two chapters, seven
paragraphs, conclusion and references. The total volume of the research is 43 pages.
Chapter 1. Contracts. Their general characteristics and types
1.1. English of documents’ writing
A document in its any appearance has always been an important part of business
doing. Business contracts are impossible without correspondence all over the world.
It does not matter, whether you communicate with your partner on the phone (orally)
or through telexes (in writing). All decisions and terms must be confirmed by
documents.
All business papers, both correspondence (letters), telexes, enquiries, offers,
claims (complaints) and contracts (agreements) are normally associated with striking
business deals and their procedure. Such documents are made up and signed “by a
judicious authority and are of legal importance” [5, P.7]. As a result of it, business
documents are written in accordance with some officially accepted forms, common
for everybody who wants to do business.
The official business language is sometimes called officialese and differs from
other kinds of the English language, mostly because of specific character of its
functional usage, which can be illustrated in classical terms of style, its
predestination, and main features.
A functional style of a language is characterised by the greater or less typification
of its constituents and supra-phrasal units, in which the choice and arrangement of
interdependent linguistic means are calculated to secure the purpose of
communication [3, P.312].
The style of official documents is divided into sub-styles of the language of
business documents, legal documents, diplomacy, and military documents. The aim
of the style of official documents is to state conditions binding two parties in an
undertaking and to reach agreement between them.
General features of the style of English of documents’ writing are the following:
1) conventionality of expression;
2) absence of emotiveness;
3) encoded character of the language system (including abbreviations);
4) general syntactical mode of combining several pronouncements into one
sentence [3, P.316].
The syntactical pattern of business correspondence style is made up from
compositional patterns of variants of this style which have their own designs. The
form of a document itself is informative, because it tells something about the matter
dealt with. From the viewpoint of its stylistic structure, the whole document is one
sentence. It looks like separate, shaped clauses often divided by commas or
semicolons, and not by full stops, often numbered. Every predicate construction
begins with a capital letter in the form of a participial or an infinitive construction.

e.g. 3. Claims
3.1. In case of non-confirmity of the quality of the goods actually delivered by
Sellers with the contract specification, any claim concerning the quality of the goods
may be presented within two months of the date of delivery;
3.2. No claim to be considered by Sellers after expiration of the above period;
3.3. No claim presented for one lot of the goods shall be regarded by Buyers as a
reason for rejecting any other lot or lots of the goods to be delivered under the
present contract;
3.4. ……… [6, P.202].

This structurally illogical way of combining definite ideas has its sense. It serves
to show the equality of the items and similar dependence of participial and infinitive
constructions or predicate constructions.
One of the most striking features of this style is usage of words in their logical
dictionary meaning. There is no room for contextual meanings or for any kind of
simultaneous realisation of two meanings. Words with emotive meanings are not to
be found there either [3, P.31].
Every type of business documents has its own set phrases and clichés which may
sound strange in colloquial English, e.g. invoice, book value, currency clause,
promissory note, assets, etc. If a person wants to avoid misunderstanding, he / she
should use glossary of commercial terms, and vice versa.
Indeed, there are many differences in the vocabulary of formal and informal
business correspondence. Much vocabulary of formal English is of the French, Latin
and Greek origin. They are often translated into informal language by replacing them
by words or phrases of the Anglo-Saxon origin.
e.g. Formal style Informal style
commence begin, start
conclude end, finish, stop
prolong, continue go on
Let us compare examples where these words are used in different styles.
e.g. I am informing you that the meeting will commence at 4 p.m. (formal)
I’d like to remind you that the meeting will begin at 4p.m. (informal)
The meeting concluded with signing the contract. (formal)
The meeting ended with signing the contract. (informal)
Phrasal and prepositional verbs are characteristic of informal style, that is why
they are not used in business correspondence. Their formal equivalents are used in
official texts instead.
Formal style Informal style
discover find out
explode blow up
encounter come across
invent make up
investigate look into
e.g. In case of discovering discrepancy of quality and quantity of the product
inform us immediately.
Spoken English is full of various vocabulary, both standard and slangy. We also
have here different connectors, such as well, you see, a kind of which cannot be used
in written business English, both logically and stylistically. They are logically
excluded because of a little amount of information they convey. Business
documents, on the contrary, convey a lot of information in almost any word. Thus, a
person should be aware of these factors and not mix up colloquial and business
English, drawing up a document.
Informal terms have emotive qualities which are not present in formal language.
Formal language often insists on a greater deal of preciseness. But the problem is
that there are not always proper equivalents in formal and informal English. The
informal word job, for instance, has no formal equivalent. Instead of it, we have to
look for a more restricted in usage and a more precise term, according to the context,
among possible variants: employment, post (esp. Br.E.), position, appointment,
vocation, etc. [16, P.12 – 13]
Business English is formal. We use it in business correspondence, official reports
and regulations. Actually, it is always written. Exceptionally it is used in speech, for
example, in formal public speeches. There are various degrees of formality, like in
the examples:
e.g. After his father’s death, he had to change his job. (informal)
On the disease of his father, he was obliged to seek for alternative
employment. (formal)
These sentences mean roughly the same idea, but would occur in different
situations. The first sentence is fairly neutral (common core) style, while the second
one is very formal, in fact stilted, and would only occur in a written business report.
In general, grammar rules of spoken sentences are rather simple and less
constructed than grammar of written sentences, especially in agreements. It is more
difficult to divide a spoken conversation into separate sentences, and connections
between one clause and the other are less clear because the speaker relies more on
the hearer’s understanding of the context and situation, as well as on his ability to
interrupt if he fails to understand. The speaker is able to rely on features of
intonation which tells us a great deal that cannot be reflected in written punctuation.
 The grammar use in business correspondence is also different about the pronouns
who and whom, and the place of prepositions:
e.g. She wanted a partner for her business in whom she could confide. (formal)
She longed for a partner (who) she could confide in. (informal)
In what country was he born? (formal)
What country was he born in? (informal)
Formal written language often goes impersonal style. That means that one doesn’t
refer directly to himself / herself or to his / her readers, but avoids pronouns. Some
of the common features of impersonal language are passive sentences beginning
with the introductory word it and abstract nouns. The effect of the change into a
passive construction is to reverse the focus from the subject to the object of speech.
Abstract nouns, especially amount words (majority, minority, amount), specify
more precisely the meaning of an utterance.
e.g. Announcement from the librarian
It has been noted with concern that the stock of books in the library has been
declining alarmingly. Students are asked to remind themselves of the rules for the
borrowing and return of books, and to bear in mind the needs of other students.
Penalties for overdue books will in the future be strictly enforced. [16, P.13]
It is a very formal and impersonal message which could have been written in a
more informal and less impersonal way, achieved by usage of phrasal verbs,
contractions, colloquial phrases and other linguistic means:
Librarian’s message
The number of books in the library has been going down. Please make sure you
know the rules for borrowing, and don’t forget that the library is for everyone’s
convenience. So from now on, we’re going to enforce the rules strictly. You have
been warned! [16, P.13]
To be tactful is to avoid causing offence or distress in correspondence. Sometimes
it means disguising or covering up the truth. In such a case, the use of imperatives
should be polite:
 e.g. Would you like to stipulate details of the contract?
Let us compare some more examples:
e.g. I suggest that we postponed signing of the contract till tomorrow. (tactful)
Could I suggest that we postponed signing of the contract till tomorrow.
(tentative and more tactful)
In other cases tentativeness is not connected with tact, but is simply an indication
of the speaker’s reluctance to commit himself / herself on a given question. To use of
might is characteristic of business correspondence, because it is a more tentative way
of expressing possibility than may. Let us compare two sentences:
e.g. It may have been an error in a business deal.
It might have been an error in a business deal.
In the second sentence might presupposes a greater degree of uncertainty and sounds
more tactful than may.
Texts of business documents are specific and aimed at a definite purpose. In order
to make one’s business work and work effectively, a person should possess
knowledge of language standards in business letters. Skilful application of this
knowledge is somehow determined by standards of documents’ writing. If a
document is written in an accepted way, it will be assessed by specialists. A unified
business text takes up less time and work to compile in comparison with private
letters.
Since a writer of a business letter has a unified form in front of him / her, this
person follows a set pattern while doing it. All the writer’s attention is focused on
major information and data which represent the subject of the document. In this way,
an addressee can decode the subject-matter faster, because a document is written in
the standardised form.
Moreover, if business documents are drawn up in a unified and, to some extent,
simplified way, it takes less money spending and saves time of the dealing sides, and
shortens the time of business procedure as well. A special branch of English
linguistics, - business English, - is devoted to the purpose of simplifying of business
making.
Written business English has got certain traits and problems of its usage, not only
for foreigners, but for English-speaking business people.

1.2. Theoretical problems of the language of documents

Knowledge of drawing up business correspondence is equal to communicating
with people in a businesslike manner [7, P.4]. A person should know rules of
documents’ writing to make one’s business effective and profitable. All of them are
united under the notion of style.
A style of the language is a system of interrelated language means which serve a
definite aim in communication [3, P.33]. As has already been written, the style can
be formal (business written English) and informal (spoken English). The difference
of formal and informal English is a matter of style and attitude of people to each
other. However, it is not an easy matter to draw an exact line between formal and
informal English [8, P.28], and that is the first, and the most important thing to be
clarified in this paper.
English of business correspondence possesses some important qualities, common
for formal style of English as well.
The language of business correspondence is very bookish and is remarkable for
the usage of larger and more exact vocabulary, in comparison with informal style of
communication. Sentences in documents are longer and their clauses are
grammatically fitted together more carefully, which means a lot of practise for a
person who draws up a contract. It is generally considered and expected that real
business people, experts in their field of activity, should enjoy the preciseness and
careful grammatical construction. It does not mean, of course, that business people
must communicate orally in formal business style.
Formal business correspondence should be more impersonal. It should not
emphasise the individuality of the writer, and takes little account of the personal
qualities of people who are going to make use of it. Thus, the speaker should not
refer directly to himself or his readers, but avoid the pronouns I, we, you, and it may
also be of a difficulty for a person.
One more problem is that formal English lacks force and vividness. The fact that
it is formal implies its great dependence on arbitrary conventions, rather than on
natural speech habits [8, P.29]. That is why it is so hard for non-business people to
keep concentrating their attention on contents of documents all the time, as their
attention is diverted by intricate language use. Some of them will find their long and
complicated sentences rather confusing. Words of formal English may sound nice,
but their meaning is often hard to get through. Very often a person must read
something all over again to make sure what it means.
e.g. This stipulation being of the essence of the contract, default by the buyers
shall entitle the Sellers to load and ship the goods as convenient to themselves
to any of the ports named in this contract and Buyers shall take delivery
accordingly. (Extract from a standard form of contract for the sale of timber
through broker in the U.K.) [6, P.229]
Another chief problem to remember about business correspondence is that it will
be read by busy people who usually have no interest in either one’s personality or his
/ her problems [8, P.280]. Bearing in mind that one should not waste anybody’s time
and try to gain anything by impressing your employers, a person uses formal English
to avoid unnecessary details about matters handled, replacing them by strict routine.
To be as clear and brief as possible without sacrificing clarity is a common trait of
any business document.
e.g. The time of delivery of the Turbine Plant against the above contract expires
on the 1st July.
Please inform us by return of post of the progress of manufacture of the
Turbine [6, P.260].
Anyway, in some important business correspondence we may find deviations
from what is called official English of the business world. For example, if a person
wants to get a job or to sign a contract, to make a sale or to ask somebody for special
advice, he / she is likely to want to make a definite impression on the interlocutor,
like in the example:
e.g. So I spent my green years first in East Germany that influenced on me greatly
(they say I look like a German, joke), then we moved to live in Siberia where I
played an ice hockey, entered the Secondary School and fell in love with
British rock music. [4, P.35]
This person was applying for a journalist and tried to show his writing skills.
It does not mean, however, that a person in charge will be much concerned about
one’s personality without knowing a way of using it. If a person is starting business
correspondence on an important matter, the first thing to do is to consider it all
carefully from the other person’s probable viewpoint, and to go on making business
in the same way.
These are some of the most frequent problems in the theory of business
correspondence which can concern a person who is likely to get involved in a
business undertaking.

1.3. The structure of contracts and their essential clauses

Contract is a business document presenting an agreement for the delivery of
goods, services, etc., approved and signed by both the Buyer (exporter) and the
Seller (importer) [5, P.131]. By law contracts are made in writing. When striking a
deal, standard contracts are widely used. Standard contracts are not a must. Some
articles can be altered and supplemented [10, P.12].
The following items are of the greatest importance in any contract:
- contract No.;
- place and date of signing;
- names of the Sides which signed the contract;
- subject of the contract;
- quality of goods;
- price (per unit and total price);
- destination;
- delivery time;
- requirements for packing and marking;
- payment terms;
- conditions of submission and acceptance of goods;
- transport conditions; warranty conditions and sanctions;
- arbitration conditions;
- force majeure;
- judicial addresses of the Sides;
- signatures of the seller and the buyer.
All appendices form an integral part of contract. Contract is drawn up in
accordance with the established form, often on special printed forms filled in with
basic information by one-time writing. Sometimes, when a transaction is small in
volume, a contract may be concluded by telex [5, P.131].
Now the most significant clauses of contract should be regarded.
The subject-section names the product for sale or purchase. It also indicates the
unit of measure employed in foreign trade for specific commodities.
The quality of machines and equipment is to be conformed with the technical
specification of the contract. The quality of raw materials and foodstuffs is
determined by standards, samples, and description.
The price stated in a contract may be firm, fixed or sliding. Firm prices are not
subject to change in the course of the fulfilment of the contract. Fixed price governs
in the market on the day of delivery or for a given period. Sliding prices are quoted
for machinery and equipment which require a long period of delivery.
There are some kinds of payment. A cheque is a written order to a Bank given and
signed by someone who has money deposited there to pay a certain amount
mentioned in the cheque to a person named on it. In the place of the cheque system
Banks provide an international system of bank transfers. A draft is another order to
pay. It is made out by an exporter and presented to the importer. It is also called a
bill of exchange. A sight draft is a bill which is paid immediately on presentation. A
bill is to be paid at a later date is called a term draft. There are 30-day, 69-, 90- and
120-day drafts. The payment is guaranteed with a letter of credit or a revolving letter
of credit.
Transport and delivery terms. The so-called door-to-door (multimodal) transport
is wide-spread in shipping now. It involves a transfer of the goods from one kind of
transport to another. The main carrier often prefers to assume through responsibility
for the cargo he caries. In a through movement of the gods a combined transport
document is issued instead of a traditional Bill of Lading.
Packing goods for export is a highly specialised job. If the goods are improperly
packed and marked, the carrier will refuse to accept them, or will make
qualifications about the unsatisfactory condition of packing in the bill of lading.
Packing can be external (crate, bag) or internal (box, packet, flask, etc.), in which the
goods are sold. In case of consumer goods packing had a double function. On one
hand, it is for protection. On the other hand – it serves to advertise a product and
attract a customer.
Marking should be in indelible paint with recognised kind of marks. The cases in
which the equipment is packed are to be marked on three sides: on the top of the
case and two non-opposite sides. The marking shall be clearly made with indelible
paint in the languages of the dealing sides.
Insurance of goods. The export trade is subject to many risks. Ships may sink or
collide; consignment may be lost or damaged. All sensible business people now
insure goods for the full value. The idea of insurance is to obtain indemnity in case
of damage or loss. Insurance is against risk. While goods are in a warehouse, the
insurance covers the risk of fire, burglary, etc. as soon as the goods are in transit they
are insured against pilferage, damage by water, breakage or leakage. The insured is
better protected if his goods are insured against all risks. The goods may be also
covered against general and particular loss or damage.
 Force majeure is a force against which you cannot act or fight. Every contract has
a force majeure clause. It usually includes natural disasters such as an earthquake,
flood, fire, etc. It can also include such contingencies as war, embargo, sanctions.
Along with this there are some other circumstances beyond the Sellers’ control. The
Seller may find himself in a situation when he can’t fulfil his obligation under the
contract. When negotiating a contract a list of contingencies must be agreed on and
put into the contract.
When a manager makes up a contract he must not think only of his one-side
interest. He must think in terms of common interest with his counterpart. Only then
will he prove loyal to his partner. In case of a contingency the Seller must notify the
Buyers of a force majeure right away. If it is done in due time the Buyer may take
immediate action to protect his interest.
A force majeure must be a proven fact. The Seller is to submit to the Buyer a
written confirmation issued by the Chamber of Commerce to this effect. The
duration of a force majeure is, as a rule, 4 or 6 months. After that the Buyer has a
right to cancel the contract. The Seller in this case has no right to claim any
compensation for his losses.
Claims and sanctions. A contract defines rights and obligations of the parties
involved. Most often the Buyer makes quality and quantity claims on the Seller. The
cause for complaint may be poor quality, breakage, damage, short weight, leakage,
etc. The Buyer must write a statement of claim and mail it to the Seller together with
the supporting documents: Bill of Lading, Airway and Railway Bill, Survey Report,
Quality Certificate are documentary evidence. Drawings, photos, samples are
enclosed as proofs of claims. The date of a complaint is the date on which it is
mailed.
Claims can be lodged during a certain period of time, which is usually fixed in a
contract. During the claim period the Seller is to enquire into the case and
communicate his reply. He either meets the claim or declines it. If a claim has a
legitimate ground behind it the parties try to settle it amicably. The Seller in turn is
entitled to make a claim on his counterpart if the Buyer fails to meet his contractual
obligations. The Seller may inflict penalties on the Buyer if there is a default in
payment. Financially, legitimate claims are in large part settled by debit or credit
notes [10, P. 12 – 28].

1.4. Types of contracts. Abbreviations

In order to speed up the preparation of contract documents and to minimise
possibility of errors in them, a unified standardised form of contract documents, the
Master Pattern for Contract Documents, has been developed. It establishes principles
and regulations for the construction of standardised forms of documents used in
foreign trade, like Supplement to contract, Order and Order confirmation.
Supplement to contract is a business document which is an integral part of the
contract, containing amendments or additions to the previously agreed contract
conditions. The supplement should also be agreed on and signed by both the exporter
and the importer.
Order is a business document presenting the importer’s offer for dealing which
contains specific conditions of a future transaction.
Order Confirmation is a business document presenting the exporter’s message
containing unclaused acceptance of the order conditions. The Master pattern has also
been accepted as a basis for standardised forms of enquiries and offers, used at pre-
contract stages of dealing [5, P.131 – 132].
Different firms and organisations trading regularly, work out standardised forms
of contracts for typical deals. Such standardised contracts are printed and include
typical rights and trading of the contracting sides in selling and buying some goods
and services. There are special columns for the names of the Buyer and Seller,
names of goods, their quantity, prices and delivery terms. In case of declining or
adding some terms, people use supplementary columns in a contract form.
Standardised forms of export and import deals differ greatly and it makes them
two general types of contracts [13, P.146]. Thus, there are export and import
contracts. They reflect different positions of buyers and sellers in trading. Contracts
in import trade are called orders, and their submission warrancy, and delivery terms,
as well as sanctions are much harder towards the sellers than those ones in export
trade. Standardised forms of import contracts are sent to potential buyers before
getting commercial proposals and, actually, before striking a deal. The languages of
contracts are agreed upon on the both sides. It goes without saying that information
and style are kept the same not depending on the language of contract.
As textual varieties, contracts are divided into administrative-managerial,
financial-economical, advertising, scientific-technical, and artistic-publicational
∗
contracts . Functional spheres of their circulation can be easily guessed from names
of contract types in this classification, and are the subject of economic, rather than
linguistic, study.
Contracts may be differentiated by the subject of a deal. There are export
contracts for the sale of oil products, machinery tools, grain, timber, the supply of
goods, etc. Orders in import trade deal with ordering and purchasing goods. They are
often supported with requests, remindings, verifications of different terms, guarantee
and waving inspection letters, and many others.
Goods in international trade are transported with the help of multimodal (door-to-
door) shipment. In contracts delivery and acceptance terms are marked with the
International Commercial Terms (Incoterms) [10, P.16]. So, contracts can be
classified in accordance with the way of delivery. Most of Incoterms are represented
as abbreviations.
The usage of abbreviations, conventional symbols and contractions is typical of
all kinds of documents. Abbreviations are abundant, and there are special
dictionaries to decode them. They serve as signs of the code supposed to be known
only to the “initiated” [3, P.316].
On the whole, there are 14 official Incoterms of deliverance. They denote:


Лозинская Р.Г. Документ как тип текста и его стилистические характеристики / Тезисы к 7-му зональному
совещанию Восточно-Сибирского региона. – Часть1. – Иркутск, 1983.
 1. The point of deliverance. EX Works means that the seller’s only responsibility
is to make the goods available at his premises. EX Ship means that the seller shall
make the goods available to the buyer on board the ship at the destination named in
the sales contract. EX Quay means that the seller makes the goods available to the
buyer on the quay at the destination named in the sales contract.
2. The way of deliverance. FOB means Free on Board. The goods are placed on
board a ship by the seller at a port of shipment named in the sales contract. FAS
means Free Alongside Ship. That means that goods should be placed alongside the
ship to fulfil the seller’s obligations. FOR / FOT mean Free on Rail / Free on Truck.
Truck here relates to the railway wagons, and that makes these abbreviations
synonymous. FOB Airport is based on the same main principle as the ordinary FOB
term. The seller fulfils his obligations by delivering the goods to the air carrier at the
airport of departure.
3. Payment terms. C & F means Cost and Fright. The seller must pay the costs and
fright necessary to bring the goods to the named destination, but the risk of loss or
damage to the goods is transferred from the seller to the buyer when the goods pass
the ship’s rail in the port of shipment. CIF means Cost, Insurance and Fright. This
term is basically the same as C & F but with the addition that the seller has to
procure marine insurance against the risk of loss or damage to the goods during the
carriage.

Thus, in Chapter 1 we have made an attempt to clarify some items of the topic.
They are the following:
The nature of the English of documents writing is determined by its stylistic
realisation in written English. The style of official documents possesses its own
features which are reflected in standardised forms of different documents. They are
peculiarities of the vocabulary, grammar and syntactic constructions, which are the
subject of consideration in the practical part of this paper.
 The main problem of writing contracts is embodied in the notion of stylistic use.
Formal style of business English is rather hard to obtain and to follow. It remains
mostly in written form, and its peculiarities should be strictly observed. Some
theoretical problems of its functioning have already been considered. Nevertheless,
informal English influences it greatly, and even in routine papers we may find
deviations from the accepted form.
It can be explained by the fact that business is made by people, and not robots. A
person’s individuality, as well as emotions and feelings, more and more often peer
into a cool and logical world of business, creating new problems and possibilities of
business English functioning in texts of contracts and other documents.
We have also defined contract as a typical realisation of formal business English
which possesses the same stylistic features and follows the same goals as other kinds
of business correspondence.
Contents of contract also have specific clauses, and they ensure division of
contracts into certain types in accordance with a side initiating a deal, a sphere of
making a deal, types of goods and their delivery terms. Very often a way of
deliverance is encoded with the help of special abbreviations. Contracts also possess
remarkable linguistic features revealed in their texts, and they are the subject of
Chapter 2.
Chapter 2. Linguistic peculiarities of contracts
2.1. Contract as a type of text and its stylistic characteristics
From the linguistic point of view, a contract is a type of a document, because any
agreement is a completed document fixing some information. As a type of text,
contract has its own specific characteristics. Stylistic peculiarities of all document
texts are:
1. concreteness, conciseness, clearness of the stated idea;
2. high capacity of information;
3. strict logic;
4. clear rhythm of sentences;
5. accenting on the main idea with the help of word repetitions;
6. absence of connotational information;
7. a special system of clichés and stamps;
8. usage of abbreviations, conventional symbols and marks;
9. usage of terms in their direct semantic meaning; preferential usage of
monosemantic words;
10. division of a text into chapters, paragraphs, points, often numbered (clear
compositional structure of a document);
11. usage of definite syntactic models;
12. graphic decoration of a document: quality of paper, quantity and quality of
illustrations, size and kind of print.
The main features of the style of contract are:
1. steady system of linguistic means in the text of contract;
2. lack of emotional colouring;
3. decoding character of language;
4. usage of a special symbolic system;
5. definite syntactic structure (the 12 above-enumerated items).
The style of contract defines some peculiarities and techniques of its writing.
Making contracts is different in some points from writing business letters, such as
an offer, an inquiry, a complaint, etc. Some considerations important for business
letters are not important for contracts, and v.v. The main difference is that any
contract is made up by two contracting parties and contains information about many
subjects. So all points are to be approved by both parties. There are certain clearly
definable requirements for how to write contracts.
Generally, contracts should be formal, complete, clear, concrete, correct and
∗
concise. In contracts all possible informational details are not suitable. So, while
writing contracts we must observe all peculiarities of standard English grammar,
vocabulary use and stylistic appropriation. A formal contract or agreement requires
considerations of neatness and attractive arrangement. Completeness of any
contract suggests the scope of all significant facts that have reference to the issue of
the agreement. Actually, you are expected to explain what, how, and when you are
going to deal with your partner.
The next element, - clearness, - is one of the most important, because much
depends on it. Clearness could be reached by the use of simple short words, phrases
and paragraphs where the both parties of a contract explain their intentions and
issues. Clearness of any arguments actually defines your striking a deal or not.
The component which is closely connected with the previous one is concreteness.
Concreteness of a contract or an agreement is a part and a parcel of any legal
document. Besides that, the longer the document is, the more attractive and vivid its
contents should be.
The next two components are also significant. They are correctness and
conciseness. Correctness involves proper grammar use (tense-aspect forms of the
verb, verbals, articles, etc.), vocabulary use, punctuation and formal style. Grammar
should be checked with a special care, otherwise it may produce a poor impression
of the document and non-seriousness of your interests. Conciseness is usually
achieved by the use of minimum words to express maximum of information.


Лукьянова Н.А. Настольная книга бизнесмена. Курс английского языка по коммерческой деятельности и
формам деловой коммуникации. – М.: ВТИ-Дейта Пресс, 1993.
 As it has been noted above, any contract should be simple and clear, concise and
brief. Commercial correspondence often suffers from an old-fashioned, pompous
style of English which complicates the message and gives the reader the feeling that
he is reading a language he does not understand. Though the language of contract is
perhaps the most formal among all kinds of business correspondence, and the
vocabulary of such correspondence is very specific, which is connected with its
character and a great number of legal terms, it should not be archaic. It should be
clear enough in its meaning.
The style, however, should not be too simple as it may become discourteous and
sound rude. Linguists (G. Leech, J. Svartvik, Ch. Fries, O. Jespersen, M. Joos, I.V.
Arnold, B.A. Ilyish, E.M. Gordon, etc.) recommend the following stylistic devices
that might make agreements and contracts more polite: complex sentences joined
with conjunctions are preferable, rather than short sentences; passive constructions
rather than active; full forms rather than abbreviated forms, where necessary.
The right tone should be neutral, devoid of a language on one hand, and an
informal or colloquial language on the other hand. Therefore, inappropriate
vocabulary, idioms, phrasal verbs are not allowed at all.
The both contracting parties should not experience any difficulties in obtaining
information, they should be able to understand what is written. Misunderstandings
are caused by a lack of thought and care. It may happen if we use a lot of
abbreviations, figures and prepositions.
Abbreviations are very useful, because they are very quick to write and easy to
read. But the both parties are expected to know what the abbreviations stand for. If
one of the partners is not absolutely certain that the abbreviations are easily
recognised he / she should not use it.
The symbol &, which means in English and, is used in some terms like C&F
(Cost and Fright), C&I (Cost and Insurance). But is marked as # in contract texts.
The symbol № is used instead of the word number. In American English the symbol
# means number as well, but it is used in different tables and graphics, and not in
the text. It is never used, however, to denote numbers of houses.
Very often in contracts Latin abbreviations are used, for example e.g. (for
example), et al. (and others), etc. (and so on), v.v. (quite the opposite), i.e. (that
means). Also they use English abbreviations ltd. (limited), Bros. (brothers), encl.
(enclosed), dols. (dollars), etc. [4, P.45 – 46].
The use of figures instead of words for sums can create many problems for
people. To avoid any possibility of confusion, it is necessary to write sums in both
figures and words, e.g. $ 9.897.44 (nine thousand, eight hundred and ninety-seven
dollars, forty-four cents). It is also a norm to put only dollars (pounds, etc.) in
words and cents (pence, etc.) in figures only, e.g. $ 100.50 (one hundred dollars and
50 cents). From the above-written it is clear that the symbols £ (pounds) and $
(dollars), in documents in particular, are put before the sum and their usage is not of
any mistake.
Spelling rules, punctuation and grammar use should all be checked over
thoroughly. Still, there are some other ways in which inaccuracy may spoil the
contract paper. A special attention should be paid to titles, names, addresses,
references, prices, specifications, enclosures, etc., which are also of a great
importance in texts of contracts.

2.2. Grammatical peculiarities of contracts

On the whole, grammar of any contract may be characterised as rather simple and
formal. Simple here means lack of diversity of variants which occurs in every
document which is not legal. As for the grammar tenses which are used in
agreements, the most widespread are the Indefinite and the Perfect tenses, both in
the Active and Passive Voices. In many points their usage is already part and
parcel.
e.g. Sellers have sold and Buyers have bought… (Present Perfect)
The Agents shall bear all transport expenses from… (Future Indefinite)
 Our firm informed the Suppliers that the general conditions were not
contained in the order. (Past Indefinite Active / Passive)
Complex analytical forms of the verb, such as the Continuous and Perfect
Continuous Tenses, are absolutely not used in no way. The specific character of any
contract provides rare usage of the past tenses.
One of specific features of contract is usage of the verb shall [5; 6; 14; 15].
Though it is not used in Modern English, in business correspondence and
documents it keeps being used.
e.g. The result shall be considered. = The result is to be considered / will be
considered.
Buyers can pay for the goods from the first person or from the third one, both in
the plural and singular number.
e.g. Each party shall have the right to refuse any further fulfilment of the
obligations. (3d person, sing)
The Buyers shall obtain the import licence. (3d person, pl.)
We shall have the right to assign to you… (1st person, pl.)
The combination of the verb should and the infinitive also shows a future action,
but with a less degree of probability. This construction usually occurs in
subordinate clauses.
e.g. …if a delay in the delivery should exceed 3 months.
In many cases shall and should are equal in meaning.
e.g. …if the actual cost to us shall / should increase.
The peculiarity of contract is also omitting if in subordinate clauses with should,
and in this case should becomes the first element in the sentence.
e.g. We hope that you will send as enquires should you need.
Should the above circumstances continue to be in force…
Should Buyers fail to open the letter of credit in time…
One of the most striking features of Business English is a wide use of verbals,
and their study might be interesting for those who learn and teach English. The
system of non-finite forms of the verb comprises the infinitive, the -ing-form and
the participles. It is common knowledge that verbals are widely used in social
English, but they are often used in business and commercial correspondence as
well. The usage of verbals, however, is very specific and presents certain
difficulties.
One of the most frequently used verbals in business letters is the infinitive. It
may serve as an adjunct to verbs, nouns and adjectives. Accordingly, infinitive
constructions are subdivided into infinitives as verb adjuncts, infinitives as noun
adjuncts and infinitives as adjective adjuncts [3, P.58]. The most interesting and
important for the research is the first group, so we shall consider only it.
There are six types of patterns in which the infinitive is to be regarded as a verb
∗
adjunct:
1) an adjunct to an active verb;
2) an adjunct to a passive verb’
3) a complex adjunct to an active verb;
4) a prepositional complex adjunct to an active verb;
5) a wh- infinitive adjunct;
6) an adjunct to a verb in a sentence with a function of the subject.
The groups of the infinitive as an adjunct to an active verb, the infinitive as an
adjunct to a passive verb and the infinitive as a complex adjunct to an active verb
are used in commercial correspondence and in contracts in particular. The last three
types of the infinitive are very rarely used in business correspondence or might be
used just occasionally.
The infinitive as an adjunct to an active verb always follows a head-verb. In
business correspondence it is lexically dependent and commonly found after the
following verbs: to agree, to appear, to arrange, to continue, to decide, to expect,
to fail, to hesitate, to hope, to intend, to like, to manage, to need, to offer, to omit, to
plan, to prefer, to prepare, to propose, to regret, to secure, to try, to want, to wish.


Трофимова А.С. Синтаксические единицы современных английских текстов делового стиля. Автореф. дис. на
соиск. учён. степ. канд. филол. наук / ОГУ им. И.И. Мечникова. – Омск, 1998.
 e.g. They have arranged to produce the equipme nt.
We won’t fail to provide full particulars as soon as possible.
We propose to settle by bill of exchange at 60 days, documents against
acceptance.
In the case the suppliers want to have any additional information you should
contact us immediately.
Generally in contracts and agreements the infinitive adjunct to an active verb is a
simple infinitive. Sometimes, however, it may be followed by the perfect infinitive,
indicating an action which precedes that one of the predicate verb. As for the
continuous infinitive in this function the analysis of contracts has proved that it is
hardly ever used.
e.g. Property in goods, to have passed to Buyers when goods have been put a
board.
You don’t appear to have taken into account the annual summer works’ shut-
down.
The delivery of goods was to have taken place last month and we have been
caused serious inconvenience through the delay.
We expect to have been informed by Feb. 15th.
It should also be noted that in commercial correspondence the subject of the
infinitive adjunct is a person (e.g. we, they) or a thing denoted by the subject of the
sentence (e.g. our firm).
e.g. We look forward to your early reply.
The Suppliers inform the Buyers that there had been a fire.
Our enquiries with your representative whom we asked…
The infinitive in business correspondence may also serve as an adjunct to a
passive verb. In this case it always follows its head-verb and is lexically restricted.
The infinitive in this function follows the following verbs: to consider, to expect, to
instruct, to prepare, to repute, to require.
 e.g. The national Bank of Argentina has been instructed to open a credit valid
until 30 November.
The goods are considered to be in conformity with the certificate.
The delivery date is understood to be the date on which the Suppliers apply to
the Buyers’ Shipping Agents.
The use of the infinitive adjunct to a passive verb is stylistically restricted. It
frequently occurs in newspapers, scientific prose and business correspondence, but
it is not characteristic of literary style, and in social English it is not common at all.
The infinitive may serve as an adjunct to an active verb followed by a noun or a
pronoun which stands to the infinitive in the relation of a subject. The combination
is lexically restricted, because in business correspondence it may be found only
after the definite verbs from the following list: to advise, to allow, to ask, to enable,
to expert, to help, to prefer, to urge, to want, to wish.
e.g. We would advise you to take an all-rich insurance policy.
If the period of guarantee has not expired we will ask you to replace the
machine by another one.
Should the Buyers fail to keep this rate of unloading…
We agree to accept this shipment on condition that you…
The complex infinitive adjunct to an active verb is not restricted stylistically and
is in extensive use in scientific and fiction literature and also in commercial and
business correspondence.
The Indefinite Infinitive occurs in contracts in the function of the predicate,
expressing obligation and a future action.
e.g. Delivery to commence in six to eight months and to be completed in twelve
to sixteen months (to commence = will commence).
Date of shipment to be determined by date of Bill of Lading (to be
determined = will be determined).
It is allowed only in texts of contracts and other business documents.
Each contract also has constructions with participles.
 e.g. The letter of credit is to be valid for 90 days, all bank charges being at the
expense of the Buyers.
Here is a construction with Participle I where it refers to the noun in the General
Case, which goes before the participle. It is not common in speech, but it occurs in
contracts.
Constructions with the Perfect Participle, however, are rare in contracts and show
an action prior to another one expressed by the predicate.
e.g. We have included in our claim only the cost of material and labour, all other
expenses connected with the repair not having been taken into consideration.
Some participles which have no explanatory words in contracts can either
precede or follow a noun. Mostly they are constructions with Participle II:
e.g. the required specification vs. specification required;
the enclosed letter vs. the letter enclosed.
The Past Participle Passive always follows a noun if it has explanatory words.
e.g. a telegram received from London;
the cheque attached to the letter.
If a participle shows only an action which is made upon the subject, it follows a
noun.
e.g. The sellers are to inform us of the quantity of the goods loaded.
Buyers are to accept or pay for the quantity shipped.
The participle showing the quality, if there is one, precedes the noun:
e.g. illustrated catalogue; damaged goods;
within six weeks of the stipulated time of shipment.
The definite article the in contract has its own peculiarities.
In every contract there are Buyers and Sellers and these words can be used either
with the definite article or without it. Nevertheless, they are always capitalised:
Buyers, Sellers.
e.g. This contract is made between Rossexport, hereinafter called Sellers…
…and India Electric Company, hereinafter referred to as the Buyers…
 Although in Russian it is always singular, in English it can be either singular or
plural. That is why all variants are possible: the Buyers – the Sellers; the Buyer –
the Seller; Buyer – Seller. The most common is the first variant though the others
are also possible.
e.g. Should the Seller fail to notify the Buyer of a contingency…
If, however, they are to be shipped to Buyer who lives a considerable
distance away… (absence of article)
The goods sold under the present contract are to be delivered by Sellers and
accepted by Buyers. (absence of article)
The definite article is also used with ships.
e.g. The S.S. Svir is to arrive on July, the 5th.
Also the definite article is rarely used after prepositions of the Latin origin per
and ex.
e.g. The goods were shipped per S.S. Svir.
The wheat was delivered ex S.S. Svir.
The definite article is never used with nouns which are followed by a number in
sizes, codes, etc.:
e.g. under Contract № 25; Order № 1015; our account No. 100/1066;
under paragraph 9 of your General Conditions of the order;
in accordance with clause 6 of the agreement.
From the above-written we can conclude that contract has its own grammatical
and stylistic peculiarities which have much in common with the ones of business
correspondence. However, they are unique enough to consider contract a specific
type of business correspondence.

2.3. Lexical peculiarities of contracts

From the lexicological point of view contracts are of great interest. The lexicon of
contract has its own specific features. First of all, it is rather stable. As a rule, words
have their only exact meaning. There are no words which are emotionally coloured.
As a result of it, we can point out the words, which are present practically in every
contract. They are the following.
Whereas expresses every man’s idea of how a contract begins. One must be
careful about mixing up recitals of history with what is actually being agreed on. It
would be wrong to write *Where as A admits owing B $ 1000, because the admission
may later haunt one. Rather less damage would be caused by using of the proper
word. Whereas means that the parties have been engaged in a series of transactions
resulting in a dispute over accounting between them.
e.g. The surplus is to be paid for by the Buyers, whereas shortweight is to be
refunded by the Sellers.
One more compound word with the adverb where is whereby, which means by
which and refers to the present contract.
e.g. We have concluded the present contract whereby it is agreed as follows…
The usage of compound words with adverbs here / there and prepositions is also
typical of written formal style of English. Their meaning is made up from meaning
of their components. There is no principal difference, though, between meanings of
here- / there- compounds.
e.g. If shipment of the whole or part is thereby rendered impossible… (thereby =
by it; by that means; in that connection)
We are sending you herewith statement of your account. (herewith = with it /
that)
All expenses connected therewith being born by… (therewith = with it)
The examination of the goods and objection thereto… (thereto = to it)
Subject to General Conditions on Sale endorsed hereon… (hereon = on this
document)
The goods to be shipped as soon thereafter as suitable tonnage obtainable.
(thereafter = from that time)
The Sellers shall not be responsible for any damage resulting to the Buyers
therefrom. (therefrom = from it / them)
 Hereinafter is a very useful word, doing the job of the six, referred to later in a
document. Hereinafter frequently sets up abbreviated names for the contracting
parties.
e.g. Knightsbridge International Drapes, Ltd. hereinafter the Buyer.
The wood goods hereinafter specified subject to a variation in Sellers’ option
of 20 per cent.
The aforesaid is a cliché which is more preferable in texts of contracts instead of
its less formal equivalents: the above-mentioned, the above-written, as was written /
said before, and the like.
e.g. The aforesaid documents should contain references…
The aforesaid guarantee shall end for the following vehicles…
It is understood and agreed. On one hand it usually adds nothing, because every
clause in the contract is figurally understood and agreed. On the other hand, it adds
an implication that the other clauses are not backed up by this phrase. By including
one you exclude the other.
e.g. The prices in this contract are understood and agreed upon.
The delivery date is understood and agreed to be the date…
Including without limitation. Usually people want to specify things underscored in
contracts, and this phrase indulges the prediction.
e.g. You may assign any and all your rights including without limitation your
exclusive British and Commonwealth Rights.
Assignees and licensees. These are important words on which acceptability
depends from one’s point of view.
e.g. Knightsbridge, its assignees and licensees…
This beginning suggests that Knightsbridge may hand you over to somebody else
after contracts are signed. If you happen to be Knightsbridge, you will want those
particular rights and should use the phrase.
Without prejudice. The British use this phrase all by itself, leaving the reader
intrigued: without prejudice – to what exactly? Americans use it more elaborately.
Legal rights, for example, are not the same thing as remedies in the offers to enforce
them. Thus it’s the American right to write:
e.g. Without prejudice to any of my existing or future rights or remedies.
We have carefully examined the samples from this consignment and offer you,
without prejudice, an allowance of 50 USA cents per 50 kilos.
As between us – it is a useful phrase because people are always forgetting or
neglecting to mention that a great many interests may be involved in what appears to
be a simple dialogue. A is controlled by investors, and B – by a foreign parent
company. That’s why it will be useful to say in such a situation as between us…
e.g. We confirm the exchange of telexes as between us follows…
Solely on condition that – it’s one of a few phrases that can be considered better
than its short counterparts. One might ask: “Why not use just if instead of the
phrase?” If by itself opens a possibility of open contingencies.
e.g. If Baker delivers 1000 barrels I will buy them.
But it is unclear if you will buy them only from Baker. Therefore, we can use only if
as a synonym. Sometimes it works out, but not always. In this case more than an
elaborated phrase is justified.
e.g. I will buy 1000 barrels solely on condition that Baker delivers them.
The phrase makes the conditions of the deal clear.
e.g. We can accept the goods solely on condition that you grant us allowance of…
per…
In contracts there are other prepositional phrases made up from words. They are
complex, and one must be attentive using them. The prepositions also provided are
the following: on conditions that; on the understanding, etc.
e.g. We agree to this only on the understanding that the rate of freight does not
exceed.
Claims against the quality of vehicles may be submitted on conditions that the
defects are found within 40 days.
Such prepositional phrases are practically equal in meaning.
 Subject to – a few contracts do without this phrase. Many promises can be made
good only if certain things occur. The right procedure is to spell out these plausible
impediments to the degree that you can reasonably foresee them.
e.g. Our agreement is subject to the laws of Connecticut.
The wood goods hereinafter specified subject to a variation in Sellers’ option
of 20 per cent…
But there is another meaning of the prepositional phrase. It may express some
condition.
e.g. We offer you, subject to your acceptance by cable, 1000 tons of ore.
The Sellers have sold and the Buyers have bought on the terms and conditions
set forth and subject to General Conditions on Sale endorsed…
Exclusive – it’s important in contracts. English is vast and its usage creates
difficulties in many cases. Exclusivity as a term means that somebody is bored from
dealing with another one in a specified area.
In the lexicon of contracts there are many foreign words, first of all, Latin ones,
such as pro rata and pari passu. Pro rata proves helpful when payments are to be in
proportion refuting prior formulas in a contract.
e.g. Demurrage is to be paid per day and pro rata for any part of the running day.
Pari passu is used when several people are paid at the same level or time out of a
common fund.
e.g. Fractions to be considered pari passu.
Still there are such words as inferior / superior, they are often used to describe the
quality of goods.
e.g. Should the natural weight be superior or the contents of foreign admixture
inferior…
We had specially selected the goods which were superior to the samples in
every respect.
Complaints and claims may arise in connection with inferior quality of the
goods, late delivery or non-delivery of goods.
 Ad hac is also a Latin word, not often used in contracts nowadays. It means now
an arbitrary court for a concrete trial. Such Latin words as ultima, proxima are now
archaic and rarely used.
e.g. If the excess is discovered only on arrival of the goods at their ultima
destination in the U.K.
On the contrary, such a Latin adjective as extra, which means additional, keeps
being widely used in official English, and is quite common for the colloquial style.
e.g. In order to obtain delivery we have had to incur extra expenses for which we
hold you responsible.
No extra payment is to be effected for any excess weight.
Very few words are borrowed from French. The most widespread of them are
force majeure, which is an essential clause of almost any contract and serves to
describe some unpredictable events that may happen to goods while being delivered
or other reasons, and amicably, which means friendly.
e.g. Very often the parties amicably agree upon a settlement of the claim in
question.
The Sellers and the Buyers shall take all measures to settle amicably any
disputes.
So, in contracts a person can come across a definite number of words and word
combinations which make up lexical peculiarities of their texts. They all are rather
bookish and belong to formal style of written English, not being used in informal
English and rarely used in spoken formal English.
 Conclusion

The research has allowed to reveal a specific character of contract as a type of

business correspondence. The first, and most important of all, reason for considering
contract business correspondence is formal style of its language. It means that in
texts of contracts we can find a bright example of formal written English.
Formal style of English has such main features as conventionality of expression,
absence of emotiveness, encoded character of the language and general syntactic
mode of combining several ideas within one sentence. All that is revealed in texts of
contracts through their vocabulary, grammar and style.
Stylistic peculiarities of business correspondence are based on the following
factors. The syntactic pattern of business documents is one long sentence which
consists of separate numbered clauses divided by commas and semicolons. Every
clause is capitalised. That is done to show the equality of items of a document.
Written business English goes impersonal style. It means there are no direct
addressees, passive constructions are used instead of active, a great number of
amount words, modal verbs might and could instead of can and may. This all is done
for a document to sound tentative and tactful.
No connectors are used in business correspondence as they convey a little
information. In formal style whom is used instead of who. If there is a need in
prepositions, they go before whom, which is not typical of informal style at all.
Stylistic peculiarities of formal written English also imply usage of words in their
primary logic meaning and absence of contextual meanings. Formal English is
characterised by usage of special terms. They all are precise in meaning and rather
bookish. Among them there are a lot of words of the Latin, Greek and French origin,
replaced in spoken English by words of the Anglo-Saxon origin.
These factors make up the standard of documents’ writing. Special forms help to
focus readers’ attention on major information and simplify process of making a deal.
 There are the following theoretical problems in studying the problem. First of all,
there is a difficulty to draw a line between formal and informal English, as the latter
influences formal style greatly. Sentences in documents are too long and bookish to
be used freely. Documents are devoid of personal pronouns I, we, you. The language
of documents lacks force and vividness to keep strict to the point. Meanwhile, it is
hard to keep one’s attention while reading them due to this trait.
Contract is a type of a business document presenting an agreement for the delivery
of goods, services, etc., approved and signed by the Buyer and the Seller. Its aim is
to state conditions binding two parties in a deal and to reach agreement between
them.
Contract has a written standard form. It also has some essential clauses, such as
contract number, subject of contract, quality and price of goods, delivery terms,
packing and marking, transport conditions, arbitration, force majeure, judicial
addressees of the sides and their signatures. Some articles may be supplemented and
altered. Every clause has its own specifics.
Besides a contract form, there are other forms related to it: Supplement to
Contract, Order and Order Confirmation. The Master Pattern as a basis for
standardised forms of enquires and offers is used at pre-contract stages of a deal.
Contract is supported with requests, remindings, verifications of different terms,
guarantee, waving inspection letters, etc.
Contracts differ in the point of deliverance, the way of deliverance, payment
terms. Delivery terms are marked with the International Commercial Terms
(Incoterms), which are mostly abbreviated. Abbreviations serve as signs of the code
of documents.
Contracts can be export and import (orders). Import contracts include harder
conditions towards sellers than export ones. As textual varieties contracts can be
administrative-managerial, financial-economical, advertising, scientific-technical
and artistic-publicational by sphere of circulation. The subject of a deal may be
ordering and purchasing of oil products, machinery tools, grain, timber, and
whatever possible.
As a type of a document, contract fixes some information. Stylistic peculiarities of
contract are concreteness, conciseness, clearness of the idea, high capacity of
information, strict logic, clear rhythm of sentences, word repetitions which accent
the main idea, no connotations, cliches and stamps, usage of monosemantic words
and words in their direct logical meaning, division of text into chapters, paragraphs,
points, presence of definite syntactic structure.
The major difference of contract from other business papers is that it is made up
by two sides, and information in them is approved by them both. All informational
details are not suitable. Contract is formal, complete, clear, concrete, correct and
concise. It is also neat and has an attractive arrangement. The tone of contract is
neutral and devoid of both pompous and informal language. It means there are no
colloquial words and expressions, idioms, phrasal verbs. Abbreviations are not used
if possible. Full forms of words are preferable. Sums are written both in figures and
words.
Grammatical peculiarities of contact are characterised by high usage of verbals.
Its text is presented mostly with infinitive and participial constructions. Among
infinitive constructions are singled out those ones with the Simple / Indefinite and
Perfect Infinitives as adjuncts to active and passive (only in newspapers and
contracts) verbs and the Simple Infinitives as complex adjuncts to active verbs.
Participial constructions are of the following types. Participle I refers to a noun in
the General Case which goes before the participle. Perfect Participles are rare.
Participle II either follows or precedes a noun.
As for the tense-aspect forms of the English verb, the Indefinite and Perfect
tenses, both in the Active and Passive voices, are used instead of analytical forms.
The past tenses are rarely used.
Shall and should are used with all numbers and persons. Omitting if in
subordinate clauses is another feature of contract. The definite article is used with
ships, the words Buyers and Sellers. It is not used, though, after prepositions of the
Latin origin per and ex, with nouns followed by a number in sizes, codes, etc.
Lexical peculiarities of contract are the following. The lexicon of contract is
stable. All words are used in their exact meaning. There is no emotional colouring of
words. Practically in every contact there are compounds with where-, here-, there-
(whereas, thereby, herewith, thereto, etc.), hereinafter, the aforesaid, phrases: (it’s)
understood and agreed, including without limitation, assignees and licensees,
without prejudice, as between us, solely on condition that, on conditions that, on
understanding that, subject to, and others. In contracts are used words of the Latin
origin: pro rata, pari passu, inferior, superior, ultima, proxima, extra, and French
words: force majeure, amicably.
In such a way, all the formulated tasks have been solved and the purpose of the
research has been reached. Linguistic peculiarities of contract, a kind of written
business English, have been studied as groups of stylistic, grammatical and lexical
peculiarities.
 REFERENCES

1. Англо-русский экономический словарь. – М., 1976.

2. Арнольд И.В. Лексикология современного английского языка. – М.: Изд-во
лит-ры на иностр. языках, 1959. – 351 с.
3. Арнольд И.В. Основы лингвистических исследований: Учеб. пособие. – М.:
Высш. шк., 1991. – 140 с.
4. Бурмистрова Н., Котляр В. Английский язык для эффективного
менеджмента. – М.: “Технологическая школа бизнеса”, 1994, 264 с.
5. Гальперин И.Р. Стилистика английского языка. – М., 1981. – 336 с.
6. Голденков М. Азы английского сленга и деловой переписки. – Мн.:
издательский дом, 1994. – 128 с.
7. Деловая перемена с иностранными фирмами. Практическое пособие. – М.:
“Имидж”, 1991, 431 с.
8. Демидова А.К., Смирнов Э.А. Русская коммерческая корреспонденция (для
говорящих на английском языке). – М.: Русский язык, 1993. – 323 с.
9. Израилевич Е.Е. Учебник коммерческой корреспонденции и документации
на английском языке. – М.: Внешторгиздат, 1964. – 447 с.
10.Котий Г.А., Гюльмиссаров В.Р. Деловые письма на английском языке.
Образцы с переводом на русский язык (Практическое пособие). – М.: 1
Федеративная Книготорговая Компания, 1998. – 1998. – 192 с.
11. Лозинская Р.Г. Документ как тип текста и его стилистические
характеристики. / Тезисы к 7-му зональному совещанию Восточно-Сибирского
региона. Часть I. – Иркутск, 1983.
12.Лукьянова Н.А. Настольная книга бизнесмена. Курс английского языка по
коммерческой деятельности и формам деловой коммуникации. – М.: “ВТИ –
Дейта Пресс”, 1993, 570 с.
13.Майерс Л.М. Пишем по-английски: руководство по грамматике и письму на
английском языке. – СП б.: Лань, 1997. – 448 с.
14.Новый англо-русский словарь под общим руководством проф. А.М.
Смирницкого. – М., 1995.
15.Русско-английский словарь / В.М. Мюллер, В.А. Камлан, В.А.
Дашевская. – М., 1995.
16.Сальникова Л.В. Английский язык для менеджеров. – М.: Метод,
1992. – 183 с.
17.Современный английский язык (Слово и предложение): Учеб. метод.
пособие для студентов педвузов и фак-тов иностр. яз. – Иркутск,1997.
– 409 с.
18. Gordon E.M., Krylova I.P. The English Verbals.- M.: Международные
отношения, 1973. – 215 с.
19. Dear Sirs! Деловая переписка по-английски. – М.: Культура,1993. – 328 с.
20. Everyday and Business English. – СП б.: Содействие,1992. – 192 с.
21.The Issues in English Philology (Study Manual): For advanced students and for
teachers of English. – Irkutsk, 1998. - 140 p.
22. Leech G., Svartvik J. Communicative Grammar of English. – М.: Просвещение,
1983. – 304 с.
23.Longman Dictionary of Contemporary English. – M., 1992.