Week 2 Hydraulic Jump
Week 2 Hydraulic Jump
1
It was first observed and documented by Leonardo da Vinci in 1500s.[1] The
mathematics were first described by Giorgio Bidone when he published a paper in
1820 called Experiences sur le remou et sur la propagation des ondes.[2]
The phenomenon is dependent upon the initial fluid speed. If the initial speed of the
fluid is below the critical speed, then no jump is possible. For initial flow speeds which
are not significantly above the critical speed, the transition appears as an undulating
wave. As the initial flow speed increases further, the transition becomes more abrupt,
until at high enough speeds, the transition front will break and curl back upon itself.
When this happens, the jump can be accompanied by violent turbulence, eddying, air
entrainment, and surface undulations, or waves.
2
There are two main manifestations of hydraulic jumps and historically different
terminology has been used for each. However, the mechanisms behind them are
similar because they are simply variations of each other seen from different frames of
reference, and so the physics and analysis techniques can be used for both types.
The different manifestations are:
• The stationary hydraulic jump – rapidly flowing water transitions in a stationary
jump to slowly moving water as shown in Figures 1 and 2.
• The tidal bore – a wall or undulating wave of water moves upstream against
water flowing downstream as shown in Figures 3 and 4. If one considers a
frame of reference which moves along with the wave front, then the wave
front is stationary relative to the frame and has the same essential behavior as
the stationary jump.
3
Figure 1 Figure 2
4
Figure 3 Figure 4
5
1 Classes of hydraulic jumps
Hydraulic jumps can be seen in both a stationary form, which is known as a
"hydraulic jump", and a dynamic or moving form, which is known as a positive
surge or "hydraulic jump in translation".[16] They can be described using the same
analytic approaches and are simply variants of a single phenomenon.
6
Figure 3 shows a tidal bore with the characteristics common to shallow upstream
water – a large elevation difference is observed. Figure 4 shows a tidal bore with the
characteristics common to deep upstream water – a small elevation difference is
observed and the wavefront undulates
In both cases the tidal wave moves at the speed characteristic of waves in water of the
depth found immediately behind the wave front. A key feature of tidal bores and
positive surges is the intense turbulent mixing induced by the passage of the bore
front and by the following wave motion.[20]
7
Another variation of the moving hydraulic jump is the cascade. In the cascade, a
series of roll waves or undulating waves of water moves downstream overtaking a
shallower downstream flow of water.
A moving hydraulic jump is called a surge. The travel of wave is faster in the upper
portion than in the lower portion in case of positive surges
8
Comparing the characteristics before and after, one finds:
Descriptive Hydraulic Jump Characteristics[7][8][13][15]
The other stationary hydraulic jump occurs when a rapid flow encounters a
submerged object which throws the water upward. The mathematics behind this form
is more complex and will need to take into account the shape of the object and the
flow characteristics of the fluid around it.
9
Analysis of the hydraulic jump on a liquid surface
In spite of the apparent complexity of the flow transition, application of simple
analytic tools to a two dimensional analysis is effective in providing analytic
results which closely parallel both field and laboratory results. Analysis shows:
• Height of the jump: the relationship between the depths before and after the
jump as a function of flow rate[18]
• Energy loss in the jump
• Location of the jump on a natural or an engineered structure
• Character of the jump: undular or abrupt
10
They all reach common conclusions that:
• The ratio of the water depth before and after the jump depend solely on the ratio
of velocity of the water entering the jump to the speed of the wave over-running
the moving water.
• The height of the jump can be many times the initial depth of the water.
For a known flow rate q, as shown by the figure below, the approximation that the
momentum flux is the same just up- and downstream of the energy principle yields an
expression of the energy loss in the hydraulic jump.
Hydraulic jumps are commonly used as energy dissipators downstream of dam
spillways.
11
Applying the continuity principle
In fluid dynamics, the equation of continuity is effectively an equation of conservation
of mass. Considering any fixed closed surface within an incompressible moving fluid,
the fluid flows into a given volume at some points and flows out at other points along
the surface with no net change in mass within the space since the density is constant.
In case of a rectangular channel, then the equality of mass flux upstream (𝜌𝑣0 ℎ0 )and
downstream (𝜌𝑣1 ℎ1 ) gives:
ℎ0
𝑣0 ℎ0 = 𝑣1 ℎ1 = 𝑞 𝑜𝑟 𝑣1 = 𝑣0 ,
ℎ1
With 𝜌 the fluid density, 𝑣0 & 𝑣1 the depth-averaged flow velocities upstream and
downstream and ℎ0 and ℎ1 the corresponding water depths.
12
In rectangular channel, such conservation equation can be further simplified
to dimensionless M-y equation form, which is widely used in hydraulic jump analysis in
open channel flow. Link given below. There are examples for hydraulic jump problems
given as well in this link towards the end. Please view.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dimensionless_momentum-
depth_relationship_in_open-channel_flow
Jump height in terms of flow Dividing by constant {\displaystyle \rho } and introducing
the result from continuity gives
2
ℎ0 𝑔
𝑣0 2 ℎ0 − + ℎ0 2 − ℎ1 2 = 0
ℎ1 2
which, after some algebra, simplifies to:
1 ℎ1 ℎ1
+ 1 − 𝐹𝑟 2 = 0
2 ℎ0 ℎ0
𝑣0 2
Where 𝐹𝑟 2 = . Here 𝐹𝑟 is the dimensionless Froude number, and relates inertial
𝑔ℎ0
to gravitational forces in the upstream flow. Solving this quadratic yields:
13
8𝑣0 2
−1 ± 1+
ℎ1 𝑔ℎ0
=
ℎ0 2
Negative answers do not yield meaningful physical solutions, so this reduces to:
8𝑣0 2
−1 + 1+
ℎ1 𝑔ℎ0
= 𝑠𝑜
ℎ0 2
ℎ1 1 + 8𝐹𝑟 2 − 1
= ,
ℎ0 2
14
𝑣0 2 ℎ
• When = 1, then ℎ1 = 1 (i.e., there is no jump)
𝑔ℎ0 0
𝑣0 2 ℎ1
• When < 1, then < 1 (i.e., there is a negative jump – this can be shown as
𝑔ℎ0 ℎ0
not conserving energy and is only physically possible if some force were to
accelerate the fluid at that point)
𝑣0 2 ℎ
• When > 1, then ℎ1 > 1 (i.e., there is a positive jump)
𝑔ℎ0 0
This is equivalent to the condition that 𝐹𝑟 > 1. Since the 𝑔ℎ0 is the speed of a
shallow gravity wave, the condition that 𝐹𝑟 > 1 is equivalent to stating that the
initial velocity represents supercritical flow (Froude number > 1) while the final
velocity represents subcritical flow (Froude number < 1).
15
Undulations downstream of the jumpPractically this means that water accelerated by
large drops can create stronger standing waves (undular bores) in the form of
hydraulic jumps as it decelerates at the base of the drop. Such standing waves, when
found downstream of a weir or natural rock ledge, can form an extremely dangerous
"keeper" with a water wall that "keeps" floating objects (e.g., logs, kayaks, or kayakers)
recirculating in the standing wave for extended periods.
16
Location of hydraulic jump in a streambed or an engineered
structure
In the design of a dam the energy of the fast-flowing stream over a spillway must be
partially dissipated to prevent erosion of the streambed downstream of the spillway,
which could ultimately lead to failure of the dam. This can be done by arranging for
the formation of a hydraulic jump to dissipate energy. To limit damage, this hydraulic
jump normally occurs on an apron engineered to withstand hydraulic forces and to
prevent local cavitation and other phenomena which accelerate erosion.
In the design of a spillway and apron, the engineers select the point at which a
hydraulic jump will occur. Obstructions or slope changes are routinely designed into
the apron to force a jump at a specific location. Obstructions are unnecessary, as the
slope change alone is normally sufficient. To trigger the hydraulic jump without
obstacles, an apron is designed such that the flat slope of the apron retards the rapidly
flowing water from the spillway. If the apron slope is insufficient to maintain the
original high velocity, a jump will occur.
17
Saint Anthony Falls on the Mississippi
River showing a pronounced hydraulic
jump.
19
Air entrainment in hydraulic jumps
The hydraulic jump is characterised by a highly turbulent flow. Macro-scale vortices
develop in the jump roller and interact with the free surface leading to air bubble
entrainment, splashes and droplets formation in the two-phase flow region.[23][24] The
air–water flow is associated with turbulence, which can also lead to sediment
transport. The turbulence may be strongly affected by the bubble dynamics. Physically,
the mechanisms involved in these processes are complex.
The air entrainment occurs in the form of air bubbles and air packets entrapped at the
impingement of the upstream jet flow with the roller. The air packets are broken up in
very small air bubbles as they are entrained in the shear region, characterised by large
air contents and maximum bubble count rates.[25] Once the entrained bubbles are
advected into regions of lesser shear, bubble collisions and coalescence lead to larger
air entities that are driven toward the free-surface by a combination of buoyancy and
turbulent advection.
20
Tabular summary of the analytic conclusions
Hydraulic Jump Characteristics[7][8][13][15]
22
References and notes[edit]
1. ^ "Household phenomenon observed by Leonardo da Vinci finally
explained". Retrieved 2018-08-08.
2. ^ Cabrera, Enrique (2010). Water Engineering and Management
through Time: Learning from History. CRC Press. ISBN 978-0415480024.
3. ^ a b Douglas, J.F.; Gasiorek, J.M.; Swaffield, J.A. (2001). Fluid
Mechanics (4th ed.). Essex: Prentice Hall. ISBN 978-0-582-41476-1.
4. ^ a b Faber, T.E. (1995). Fluid Dynamics for Physicists. Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-42969-6.
5. ^ a b Faulkner, L.L. (2000). Practical Fluid Mechanics for Engineering
Applications. Basil, Switzerland: Marcel Dekker AG. ISBN 978-0-8247-
9575-7.
6. ^ a b Fox, R.W.; McDonald, A.T. (1985). Introduction to Fluid
Mechanics. John Wiley & Sons. ISBN 978-0-471-88598-6.
7. ^a b c d Hager, Willi H. (1995). Energy Dissipaters and Hydraulic Jump.
Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. ISBN 978-90-5410-198-7.
8. ^ a b c d Khatsuria, R.M. (2005). Hydraulics of Spillways and Energy
Dissipaters. New York: Marcel Dekker. ISBN 978-0-8247-5789-2.
23
9. Lighthill, James (1978). Waves in Fluids. Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press. ISBN 978-0-521-29233-7.
10. ^ a b Roberson, J.A.; Crowe, C.T (1990). Engineering Fluid Mechanics.
Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company. ISBN 978-0-395-38124-3.
11. ^ a b Streeter, V.L.; Wylie, E.B. (1979). Fluid Mechanics. New York: McGraw-
Hill Book Company. ISBN 978-0-07-062232-6.
12. ^ Vennard, John K. (1963). Elementary Fluid Mechanics (4th ed.). New
York: John Wiley & Sons.
13. ^ a b c d Vischer, D.L.; Hager, W.H. (1995). Energy Dissipaters. Rotterdam:
A.A. Balkema. ISBN 978-0-8247-5789-2.
14. ^ White, Frank M. (1986). Fluid Mechanics. McGraw Hill, Inc. ISBN 978-0-
07-069673-0.
15. ^ a b c d e f g h Chanson, H. (2004). The Hydraulic of Open Channel Flow: an
Introduction(2nd ed.). Butterworth-Heinemann. ISBN 978-0-7506-5978-9.
16. ^ a b c d e f Chanson, H. (2009). "Current Knowledge In Hydraulic Jumps And
Related Phenomena. A Survey of Experimental Results" (PDF). European
Journal of Mechanics B. 28 (2): 191–
210. Bibcode:2009EJMF...28..191C. doi:10.1016/j.euromechflu.2008.06.004.
24
17. Murzyn, F.; Chanson, H. (2009). "Free-Surface Fluctuations in
Hydraulic Jumps: Experimental Observations". Experimental Thermal
and Fluid Science. 33 (7): 1055–
1064. doi:10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2009.06.003.
18. ^ a b c d e f Chanson, Hubert (April 2012). "Momentum
Considerations in Hydraulic Jumps and Bores" (PDF). Journal of
Irrigation and Drainage Engineering. 138 (4): 382–
385. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0000409.
19. ^ "Hydraulic Jump -Types and Characteristics of Hydraulic
Jump". The Constructor. 2016-06-17. Retrieved 2019-12-26.
20. ^ Koch, C.; Chanson, H. (2009). "Turbulence Measurements in
Positive Surges and Bores" (PDF). Journal of Hydraulic Research. 47 (1):
29–40. doi:10.3826/jhr.2009.2954.
21. ^ This section outlines the approaches at an overview level only.
22. ^ "Energy loss in a hydraulic jump". sdsu. Retrieved 1 July 2015.
23. ^ Chanson, H.; Brattberg, T. (2000). "Experimental Study of the Air-
Water Shear Flow in a Hydraulic Jump" (PDF). International Journal of
Multiphase Flow. 26 (4): 583–607. doi:10.1016/S0301-9322(99)00016-
6.
25
24. Murzyn, F.; Chanson, H. (2009). "Two-phase gas-liquid flow properties in
the hydraulic jump: Review and perspectives". In S. Martin and J.R. Williams
(ed.). Multiphase Flow Research (PDF). Hauppauge NY, USA: Nova Science
Publishers. Chapter 9, pp. 497–542. ISBN 978-1-60692-448-8.
25. ^ Chanson, H. (2007). "Bubbly Flow Structure in Hydraulic
Jump" (PDF). European Journal of Mechanics B. 26 (3): 367–
384. Bibcode:2007EJMF...26..367C. doi:10.1016/j.euromechflu.2006.08.001.
26. ^ a b Bhagat, R.K.; Jha, N.K.; Linden, P.F.; Wilson, D.I. (2018). "On the origin
of the circular hydraulic jump in a thin liquid film". Journal of Fluid
Mechanics. 851:
R5. arXiv:1712.04255. Bibcode:2018JFM...851R...5B. doi:10.1017/jfm.2018.55
8.
27. ^ Kostic, Svetlana; Parker, Gary (2006). "The Response of Turbidity
Currents to a Canyon-Fan Transition: Internal Hydraulic Jumps and
Depositional Signatures". Journal of Hydraulic Research. 44 (5): 631–
653. doi:10.1080/00221686.2006.9521713.
28. ^a b Clément, Jean Marie (2015). Dancing with the wind. Pivetta
Partners. ISBN 978-8890343247.
29. ^ "Cloud-surfers ride Morning Glory in north Queensland". Retrieved 12
June 2018.
26