Scribd
Upload
44 views4 pages

NLRC and VA OCTOBER 28 29

The document provides an outline of labor law topics and cases related to claims, appeals processes, the National Labor Relations Commission (NLRC), and voluntary arbitrators. It includes sections on claims with reinstatement, issuance of writs of execution, appeal requirements and processes for the NLRC, the composition and powers of the NLRC, and cases related to voluntary arbitrators. The document is intended to be brief and concise, fitting within one page.

Uploaded by

hellostudents123
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
44 views4 pages

NLRC and VA OCTOBER 28 29

The document provides an outline of labor law topics and cases related to claims, appeals processes, the National Labor Relations Commission (NLRC), and voluntary arbitrators. It includes sections on claims with reinstatement, issuance of writs of execution, appeal requirements and processes for the NLRC, the composition and powers of the NLRC, and cases related to voluntary arbitrators. The document is intended to be brief and concise, fitting within one page.

Uploaded by

hellostudents123
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 4

MAKE YOUR DIGEST BRIEF AND CONCISE.

KUNG KAYA MA ONE (1) PAGE


LANG GO!

ONE DOCUMENT LANG PAG MAGSEND KAYO GUYS PARA MADALI I-


DOWNLOAD. THANKS

a. Claims with reinstatement - 224(a)(3); RA 7730, 128; RA 8188;


NLRC En Banc 01-19

San Miguel v. NLRC, May 31, 1988


COCOFED v. Trajano, Feb. 15, 1995
Callanta v. Carnation, Oct. 28, 1986

h. Issuance of writ of execution

Ilaw v. Nestle, September 23, 2015—AMPATUAN (see execution)

1. Appeal of decisions of Labor Arbiters – 224(b), 229;


Rule VI of NLRC Rules; NLRC En Banc 06-18;
NLRC En Banc 08-18 (pauper litigant)

a. Requirements for a valid appeal

1. Compliance with 10-day period; NLRC Rules, Section 4(b),


last par, Rule III
ASSIGNMENT (OCTOBER 22,2020)
 Vir-Jen v NLRC, July 20, 1982-- SOSOBAN
Murillo v. Sun Valley, June 30, 1988-TENG
 Aquino v NLRC, September 3, 1993-VIVA
 Cervantes v City Service, April 18, 2016-AMPATUAN
 Narag v. NLRC, Oct. 28, 1989-AMPOG
 Republic v Guinmapang, August 24, 2009--BANOSAN

2. Grounds- Section 2, Rule VI NLRC Rules

3. Where filed- Id. at Sec. 3


4. Requisites for perfection- Id. at Sec 4

5. Appeal fees- Id. at Sec. 5; NLRC En Banc 08-18 (pauper litigant)

Tan v. NLRC, Feb. 19, 1989 AMPATUAN


Philamlife v Perez, February 21, 1989 AMPOG

6. Appeal bond- Id. at Sec. 6; NLRC En Banc 06-18

Rosewood v. NLRC, May 21, 1998 BANOSAN


Quiambao v. NLRC, 254 SCRA 211 BANOSAN
Rada v. NLRC, 205 SCRA 69 BANOSAN
Blancaflor v. NLRC, 218 SCRA 366 ESMAEL
Yourbus v. NLRC, 190 SCRA 160 ESMAEL
Fernandez v. NLRC, Jan. 28, 1998 ESMAEL
Star Angel v. NLRC, Sept. 20, 1994 FRIAS
Lasam Trading v. Leogardo, Sept. 20, 1986 FRIAS
Halite v. S.S. Ventures, February 4, 2015 FRIAS

7. Effect of perfected appeal-Id. at Sec. 9

8. Frivolous Appeal- Id. at Sec. 10

Bongay v. Martinez, March 14, 1988 MAHUSAY


Garcia v. NLRC Nov. 18, 1986 MAHUSAY
Dela Cruz v Blanco, June 8, 1942 MAHUSAY

9. Execution - 230

Ilaw v. Nestle, September 23, 2015 AMPATUAN

A. National Labor Relations Commission- Composition

Mayor v. Macaraig, March 5, 1991 MALICAY

1. Powers

a. Rule-making Power- 225(a)

Espanol v. PVA, 137 SCRA 314 MALICAY


Rizal Empire v. NLRC, 150 SCRA 588 MALICAY

b. Issue Compulsory Processes – 225(b)

c. Investigations and Dispute-Resolution – 225©

d. Contempt Power – 225(d), Rule X, Sec. 2, NLRC Rules

e. Conduct Ocular Inspection – 226

f. Appellate Adjudicatory Power – 129, 224(b)

Pondoc v. NLRC, Oct. 3, 1996--MARTINEZ

g. Original Adjudicatory Power – 225(e), 278(g)

h. Temporary Restraining Orders/Injunctions – 225(e), 266, 279,

1. TRO/Injunction by Arbiter
2. Requisites for issuance of TRO/Injunction

IBM v. NLRC, June 27, 1991- PENAMANTE


BPI v. Hontanosas, June 25, 2014- MARTINEZ
Brizuela v. Legaspi, April 30, 2008- MARTINEZ
The Namaris Philippines v. CA, February 3, 2014 -PENAMANTE

2. Appeal/Review of NLRC decisions

St. Martin v. NLRC, Sept. 16, 1998 PENAMANTE


Sugarsteel v. Albina, June 6, 2016 -AMPATUAN
Pacios v. Tahanang, November 18, 2018- PICOT
Sara Lee v. Macatlang, January 14, 2015- PICOT
Malayang v. NLRC, August 28, 2018 - PACLIBAR
Philippines v. Legaspi, June 10, 2013 -PACLIBAR

B. Voluntary Arbitrators – 224©, 274, 275, 276, 277, 292(f)

San Jose v. NLRC, August 17, 1998 -VIVA


Maneja v. NLRC, June 5, 1998 -VIVA
Mantrade v. Bacungan, 144 SCRA 510 VIVA

Sime Darby v. Magsalin, Dec. 15, 1989- AMPOG


Atlas v. NLRC, Nov. 18, 2002 -AMPOG
Goya, Inc. v. Goya Union, January 21, 2013- SOSOBAN
Octavio v. PLDT, February 27, 2013- SOSOBAN
Ace v. Fernandez, October 10, 2012 -TENG
7K Corporation v. Albarico, June 26, 2013 _TENG
Guagua v. Guagua Faculty, July 13, 2016- SINSUAT
Agustin v. Bartolome, January 28, 2019-SINSUAT

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy