Principal Professional Development Plan
Principal Professional Development Plan
PL
Goal Professional Learning Goals Rationale/Sources of Evidence
No.
To build capacity and develop a common language in K-7 Analysis of teacher observation(s)revealed that differentiation of
staff in the area of Differentiation of Instruction and instruction using mechanisms such as UDL choice menus are needed
Questioning and Discussion Techniques. Building capacity to raise student engagement in the learning environment.
with will increase student choice, student engagement and Analysis of teacher observation(s) data indicated that teachers need
instructional rigor in the learning environment and professional development support in this area.
1 ultimately prepare students for academic success with the Analysis of teacher observation(s) indicated that teachers need to
Common Core Standards. raise student engagement and rigor in the learning environment
through active questioning and discussion techniques.
Results and feedback of administrative/district walk-throughs
produced evidence and confirmed the need for professional
development in this area.
Support teachers in creating and implementing high-quality SGOs are a requirement of the new evaluation initiative for all
Student Growth Objectives (SGOs). teachers.
This goal aligns with the district’s priority of preparing all educators for
the implementation of the AchieveNJ.
Staff scores on SGO quality using the NJDOE rubric indicated teachers
2 need to improve their skills in this area (reported to the District
Evaluation Advisory Committee (DEAC).
Staff understanding of high quality SGOs need to improve to ensure
rigor and student growth are at the center of the measurement
chosen.
3 To effectively implement all aspects of the Balanced Literacy This goal aligns with the district’s priority of implementing its newly
4 By June 1, 2016 All Math teaching staff will increase the This goal will be measured by a 'sustained and marked' increase in the
degree to which their ‘enacted curriculum’ (the daily curricular following performance indicators as compared to 2015 end of year summative
experience of students within the instructional setting evaluation results and as documented in 2016 end of year summative
exemplified by the actual curricular content that students
evaluation results:
engage in within the classroom) is reflective of standards-
based teaching and learning; whereby 1a: Demonstrating Knowledge of Content and Pedagogy,
(a) learning is made social through collaboration, discussion,
and discourse, 1e: Designing Coherent Instruction,
(b) students are engaged in sense- and meaning-making, and
(c) students are encouraged to employ alternative approaches 3b: Using Questioning and Discussion Techniques,
to mathematical problem solving.
3c: Engaging Students in Learning
3: Essential Resources
PL Resources Other Implementation Considerations
Goal
3 Focused common planning meetings for collaborative teams to Administration to recommend teachers to model lessons.
reflect on artifact evidence of effective practice and share Principals/evaluators should identify teachers who must view model
successes of impact on student learning. lessons by colleagues.
Ensure teachers’ access to videos, webinars, and online Make plan for tracking student progress to assess impact of new
communities via the www.teachingchannel.org teaching strategies.
4 Focused common planning meetings for collaborative teams to reflect Administration to recommend teachers to model lessons.
on artifact evidence of effective practice and share successes of impact Principals/evaluators should identify teachers who must view model
on student learning. lessons by colleagues.
Ensure teachers’ access to videos, webinars, and online communities
Make plan for tracking student progress to assess impact of new
via the What Works ClearingHouse (WWCH).
teaching strategies.
Leverage/utilize Model classrooms within the building to support goals
PL
Goal Mid-year PDP Progress Report Sources of Evidence Review Date
No.
1
2
3