The parties agreed to submit position papers to a voluntary arbitrator regarding a labor dispute between Luzon Development Bank and its employees' association. However, LDB failed to submit its position paper despite a reminder. Without hearing LDB's side, the arbitrator ruled against the bank. LDB petitioned to set aside the ruling, questioning the arbitrator's jurisdiction. The Supreme Court ruled that voluntary arbitrators perform a state function delegated by the Labor Code, making them quasi-judicial instrumentalities. As such, their rulings can be appealed to the Court of Appeals, consistent with appeals of other quasi-judicial bodies. This does not conflict with allowing direct appeals of NLRC rulings to the Supreme Court
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0 ratings0% found this document useful (0 votes)
207 views2 pages
Luzon Dev Bank Vs Assoc of Luzon Dev Bank
The parties agreed to submit position papers to a voluntary arbitrator regarding a labor dispute between Luzon Development Bank and its employees' association. However, LDB failed to submit its position paper despite a reminder. Without hearing LDB's side, the arbitrator ruled against the bank. LDB petitioned to set aside the ruling, questioning the arbitrator's jurisdiction. The Supreme Court ruled that voluntary arbitrators perform a state function delegated by the Labor Code, making them quasi-judicial instrumentalities. As such, their rulings can be appealed to the Court of Appeals, consistent with appeals of other quasi-judicial bodies. This does not conflict with allowing direct appeals of NLRC rulings to the Supreme Court
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2
LUZON DEVELOPMENT BANK vs.
ASSOCIATION OF LUZON DEVELOPMENT BANK EMPLOYEES
G.R. No. 120319 October 6, 1995
ROMERO, J.:
Facts:
At a conference, the parties agreed on the submission of their
respective Position Papers. LDB, on the other hand, failed to submit its Position Paper despite a letter from the Voluntary Arbitrator reminding them to do so. ithout LDB's Position Paper, the Voluntary Arbitrator rendered a decision aganst the Bank. Hence, this petition for certiorari and prohibition seeking to set aside the decision of the Voluntary Arbitrator and to prohibit her from enforcing the same.
issue:
Whether or not the Labor Arbitrator has jsdctn v ths cas.
Ling:
The voluntary arbitrator no less performs a state function pursuant to
a governmental power delegated to him under the provisions therefor in the Labor Code and he falls, therefore, within the contemplation of the term "instrumentality". The fact that his functions and powers are provided for in the Labor Code does not place him within the exceptions to the law since he is a quasi-judicial instrumentality as contemplated therein. A fortiori, the decision or award of the voluntary arbitrator or panel of arbitrators should likewise be appealable to the Court of Appeals just like those of the quasi-judicial agencies, boards and commissions. This would be in furtherance of, and consistent with, the original purpose of Circular No. 1-91 to provide a uniform procedure for the appellate review of adjudications of all quasi-judicial entities not expressly excepted from the coverage of Sec. 9 of B.P. 129 by either the Constitution or another statute. Nor will it run counter to the legislative intendment that decisions of the NLRC be reviewable directly by the Supreme Court since, precisely, the cases within the adjudicative competence of the voluntary arbitrator are excluded from the jurisdiction of the NLRC or the labor arbiter.