Fibonacci
Fibonacci
In [1] some relations between the odd terms F1 , F3 , F5 , . . . were obtained; here we show
that similar relations hold between the terms of any r-subsequence, by which we mean a
subsequence of the type Fn , Fn+r , Fn+2r , . . . .
Recall that the Fibonacci sequence can be extended to the left by rewriting the re-
currence relation as Fn−1 = Fn+1 − Fn . Now,
Fn = 2Fn − Fn , (2)
and Fn+1 = Fn + Fn−1 . (3)
Adding (2) and (3), we obtain
Fn+2 = 3Fn − Fn−2 , (4)
which is the lemma from [1]. If we now add (3) and (4), we get
Fn+3 = 4Fn + Fn−3 , (5)
and so on. The coefficients 2, 1, 3, 4 of Fn in (2)–(5) are recognised as coming from the
Lucas sequence, defined by
So if we continue the above process, we obtain a recurrence relation for any Fibonacci
r-subsequence:
Fn+r = Lr Fn + (−1)r+1 Fn−r . (7)
Indeed, since the Lucas numbers Ln satisfy the same recurrence relation as the Fn , a
similar argument yields
Ln+r = Lr Ln + (−1)r+1 Ln−r . (8)
Note, for future use, that on putting n = r in this, we obtain
1
then an easy induction shows that
!
Fn−1 Fn
A =
n
.
Fn Fn+1
Taking determinants, and noting that det A = −1, we have the well-known result
Surely this must come from another determinant? Indeed it does, and more generally if
we put !
Fn−r Fn
Bn, r =
Fn Fn+r
we shall find the value of det Bn, r , that is, of Fn−r Fn+r −Fn2 , in part (iii) of the proposition
below. Note that Bn, 1 = An ; also, if we put
!
0 1
Cr = ,
(−1) r+1
Lr
then it is immediate from (7) that Cr Bn, r = Bn+r, r . However, to avoid having r separate
induction arguments for each value of r, we need a way of obtaining Bn+1, r (rather than
Bn+r, r ) from Bn, r , which we shall do in part (ii) of the proposition below.
First a couple more results from [2]. The equation Am An = Am+n yields
from which
F−n = (−1)n+1 Fn . (13)
Now put !
−Fr−1 1
Dr = .
(−1)r+1
Fr+1
2
! !
−Fr−1 1 Fn−r Fn
(ii) Dr Bn, r =
(−1)r+1
Fr+1 Fn Fn+r
!
Fn − Fr−1 Fn−r Fn+r − Fr−1 Fn
= .
(−1) Fn−r + Fr+1 Fn (−1)r+1 Fn + Fr+1 Fn+r
r+1
In the first column, we have, by (12), Fn − Fr−1 Fn−r = Fr Fn+1−r , as required; and then
as required. Similarly for the second column, replacing n by n + r. This completes (ii).
(iii) Since F0 = 0, det B0, r = F−r Fr = (−1)r+1 Fr2 , by (13). So the result is true for
n = 0. The general result now follows by induction on n, using (i) and (ii).
(iv) This is an exercise for the reader. (It is not used elsewhere.)
which generalises both (11) and also Corollary 1 of [1]. Next, we generalise the theorem
from [1]. If we substitute into (14) from (7), we get the generalisation
By (9), we deduce
2
Fn+r − L2r Fn2 + Fn−r
2
= 2(−1)n Fr2 . (16)
2
When r = 2 this becomes Fn+2 − 7Fn2 + Fn−2
2
= 2(−1)n , which, in the case where n is
odd, is Corollary 2 from [1].
3
References
1. V. Rajesh and G. Leversha, Some properties of odd terms of the Fibonacci sequence,
Math. Gaz. 88 (2004), 85–6.