0% found this document useful (0 votes)
129 views5 pages

Bearing Capacity of Driven Pile 20201110

This document summarizes the bearing capacity analysis of a driven pile foundation with the following details: 1. The pile is 400mm in diameter and 35m long, extending from an elevation of 4.8m down to a tip depth of 35.6m. 2. The analysis calculates the pile's compression, tension, and lateral bearing capacities using both theoretical and empirical methods. 3. The theoretical method yields an ultimate compression capacity of 353 tons and the empirical method yields 261 tons. Both meet the required capacity.

Uploaded by

Tuan Le
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
129 views5 pages

Bearing Capacity of Driven Pile 20201110

This document summarizes the bearing capacity analysis of a driven pile foundation with the following details: 1. The pile is 400mm in diameter and 35m long, extending from an elevation of 4.8m down to a tip depth of 35.6m. 2. The analysis calculates the pile's compression, tension, and lateral bearing capacities using both theoretical and empirical methods. 3. The theoretical method yields an ultimate compression capacity of 353 tons and the empirical method yields 261 tons. Both meet the required capacity.

Uploaded by

Tuan Le
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 5

Project: 20Q6599A

Borehole No.: BH-01-BH-28

1. Bearing Capacity of Pile Foundation

Pile Type: Driven Pile SPT N Value


Compression (tons) Tension (tons) Lateral (tons) 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
Vertical Resistance of Individual Pile (tons)
Short-term Short-term Randolph and Worth Method (1979)
Long-term Short-term Ultimate Long-term Ultimate d=1.0cm d=1.5cm 4
(Seismic) (Wind)

118 177 353 48 90 90 257 6 8 (Theoretical Method) 2


Long-term Load Short-term Load Ultimate
87 130 261 36 67 67 188 6 8 (Empirical Method) deformation deformation Capacity 0
118 177 353 48 90 90 257 6 8 (Theoretical Method-NSF) 10.0 mm 15.0 mm 40.0 mm
-2
87 130 261 36 67 67 188 6 8 (Empirical Method-NSF) 102 132 353
-4
2.1. Vertical Bearing Capacity (Theoretical method):
Qu = qp Ap + fs As -6
For sandy soil:
-8
qp=σv' Nq, f s =K σ v ' tan δ ≦ K σ v,critical ' tan δ
-10
For clayey soil:
qp = 9 Su fs = α Su -12

-14
2.2. Vertical Bearing Capacity (Emperical method, Meyerhof, 1976):

Elevation (m),
-16
Qu = qp Ap + fs As
For sandy soil: -18

qp = 30 N <= 1800 t/m2 fs = 1/3 N <= 10 t/m2 -20


For gravel: qp = 30 N <= 1800 t/m2
-22
For clayey soil:
qp = 9 Su <= 450 t/m2 fs = α Su <= 15 t/m2 -24

-26
Input Data:
-28
Pile Type = Driven H.P.P (Elevation) = 4.8 m Critical Depth = 20.0 D
Pile Length = 35 m Ground Elevation = 4.8 m Depth of Top of Bearing Stratum = 10.2 m -30

Pile Diameter = 400 mm Groundwater Depth = 3.00 m Critical Depth = 18.2 m -32
Thickness of Pile = 75 2610 Depth of T.O.P. = 0.60 m F1 = 3.0 2.0
-34
Ap = 0.126 m2 T.O.P (elevation) = 4.20 m F2 = 2.0 2.0
-36
As = 1.257 m Depth of Pile Tip = 35.60 m Compressible bottom layer = 0
W p' = 6.16 ton -38 GEODATA
Pile Length
I= 106489 cm4 -40

By: Vu Tran Khoa


Phone: 0968319168
Theorytical Method Empirical Method
Overburden
Layer No. Type Depth Thickness Pile length SPT-N α Su (t/m2) γ (t/m3) DE φ (°) σv',mid (t/m2) σv',tip (t/m2) K fs (t/m2) Qs (ton) Qs,E (ton) Qp (ton) Qs (ton) Qs,E (ton) Qp (ton)
Depth
(m) (m) (m)
1 Fill 0.00 0.00 0.00 9 0.00 1.85 1.00 31 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2 S-Fill 1.80 1.80 1.20 9 0.00 1.85 1.00 31 1.67 3.33 1.80 1.00 0.72 1.08 1.08 0.00 4.52 4.52 0.00
3 OH/OM 3.00 1.20 1.20 2 0.85 1.30 1.82 1.00 4.42 4.34 1.20 1.11 1.67 1.67 0.00 1.67 1.67 0.00
4 OH/OM 7.80 4.80 4.80 5 0.821 3.10 1.82 1.00 6.30 8.36 4.80 2.55 15.35 15.35 0.00 15.35 15.35 0.00
5 OH/OM 10.80 3.00 3.00 6 0.793 3.80 1.82 1.00 9.59 10.87 3.00 3.01 11.36 11.36 0.00 11.36 11.36 0.00
6 SC-SM 12.10 1.30 1.30 10 0.00 1.80 1.00 26 11.39 11.94 1.30 1.00 4.03 6.59 6.59 0.00 5.45 5.45 0.00
7 SC-SM 13.50 1.40 1.40 10 0.00 1.80 1.00 26 12.50 13.08 1.40 1.00 4.42 7.78 7.78 0.00 5.86 5.86 0.00
8 SC-SM 14.80 1.30 1.30 10 0.00 1.80 1.00 26 13.60 14.14 1.30 1.00 4.82 7.87 7.87 0.00 5.45 5.45 0.00
9 SC-SM 16.10 1.30 1.30 11 0.00 1.80 1.00 26 14.66 15.21 1.30 1.00 5.19 8.48 8.48 0.00 5.99 5.99 0.00
10 SC-SM 17.50 1.40 1.40 11 0.00 1.80 1.00 26 15.77 16.35 1.40 1.00 5.58 9.82 9.82 0.00 6.45 6.45 0.00
11 SC-SM 18.80 1.30 1.30 11 0.00 1.80 1.00 26 16.87 17.42 1.30 1.00 5.97 9.76 9.76 0.00 5.99 5.99 0.00
12 CL 20.60 1.80 1.80 9 0.742 5.60 1.95 1.00 17.42 19.16 1.80 4.16 9.40 9.40 0.00 9.40 9.40 0.00
13 CL 22.40 1.80 1.80 9 0.742 5.60 1.95 1.00 19.16 20.90 1.80 4.16 9.40 9.40 0.00 9.40 9.40 0.00
14 CL 24.20 1.80 1.80 10 0.724 6.30 1.95 1.00 20.90 22.64 1.80 4.56 10.32 10.32 0.00 10.32 10.32 0.00
15 CL 26.00 1.80 1.80 11 0.712 6.90 1.95 1.00 22.64 24.39 1.80 4.91 11.11 11.11 0.00 11.11 11.11 0.00
16 CL 27.80 1.80 1.80 11 0.712 6.90 1.95 1.00 24.39 26.13 1.80 4.91 11.11 11.11 0.00 11.11 11.11 0.00
17 SC-SM 30.80 3.00 3.00 18 0.00 2.00 1.00 30 26.13 29.18 3.00 1.00 10.82 40.80 40.80 0.00 22.62 22.62 0.00
18 SC-SM 32.80 2.00 2.00 18 0.00 2.00 1.00 30 29.18 31.22 2.00 1.00 12.09 30.38 30.38 0.00 15.08 15.08 0.00
19 SC-SM 34.80 2.00 2.00 21 0.00 2.00 1.00 31 31.22 33.25 2.00 1.00 13.41 33.71 33.71 0.00 17.59 17.59 0.00
20 SC-SM 35.80 1.00 0.80 21 0.00 2.00 1.00 31 33.25 34.07 0.80 1.00 14.29 14.36 14.36 102.75 7.04 7.04 79.17
21 SC-SM 36.80 1.00 0.00 22 0.00 2.00 1.00 31 34.07 34.07 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
22 SC-SM 39.80 3.00 0.00 22 0.00 2.00 1.00 31 34.07 34.07 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
23 SC-SM 44.80 5.00 0.00 22 0.00 2.00 1.00 31 34.07 34.07 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
35.00 250.36 250.36 102.75 181.76 181.76 79.17
Qu = 353 261
Qu,E = 353 261
Long Term Condition, Qa = 118 87
Short Term Condition, Qa = 177 130

Effective Long term NSF condition, Qa = 118 87


3. Tension Resistance: analysis Short term load Condition, Qa = 177 130
Ta = λ f s A s / F.S. + W p ' Total Long term NSF condition, Qa = 118 87
analysis Short term load Condition, Qa = 177 130
Input Data: Empirical Long term NSF condition, Qa = 118 87
Deduct Factor, λ = 1 analysis Short term load Condition, Qa = 165 130
Long-term S. F. = 6
Short-term S. F. = 3

By: Vu Tran Khoa


Phone: 0968319168
Deflection curve, (cm) Bending Moment (ton-m) Shear force (ton)
-4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 -6 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 -7 -6 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2
Theoretical Emperical
0 0 0
Long-term Condition, Ta = 48 36
2 2 2
Short-term Condition (Seismic), Ta = 90 67
4 4 4
Short-term Condition (Wind), Ta = 90 67
6 6 6

8 8 8
4. Lateral Resistance: 10
10 10
For Long Term Condition: 12
12 12
K h = α N D -3/4 y -1/2 , β = (K h D / 4EI) α= 5.6
14 14 14
For Short Term Condition: 16 16
16

Elevation (m),
Elevation (m),
Elevation (m),
Kh = α N D -3/4
y -1/2
D E , β = (K h D / 4EI) 1/4
18 18 18

20 20 20
For Driven Pile: 22 22 22
H = (K h D / 2 β ) y, M max = 0.3224 H / β 24 24 24
For Bored Pile: 26 26 26
H = (K h D / β ) y, M max = 0.5 H / β 28 28 28

30 30 30
Input Data: 32 32 32
Connection Type = Hinge (Hinge or Fixed) 34 34 34
Concrete, fc' = 800 kg/cm2 36 Deflection 36 Bending 36 Shear
curve Moment force
Average SPT-N (0m~6D) = 3.5 38 38 38
Deduct Factor for Liquefaction, DE = 1 Chart of Lateral Forces and Moments as External Forces at Lateral Deflection of Pile Head
1.0 cm

H-M Curve
Lateral Long-term or Wind Force Short-term Seismic Force 14.0
Def. of Pile
Head kh β H Mmax kh β H Mmax
3 3
(cm) kg/cm 1/cm ton t-m kg/cm 1/cm ton t-m 12.0
0.2 2.755 0.0050 2.2 1.4 2.76 0.0050 2.2 1.4
0.4 1.948 0.0045 3.4 2.4 1.95 0.0045 3.4 2.4
10.0
0.6 1.591 0.0043 4.4 3.3 1.59 0.0043 4.4 3.3
0.8 1.378 0.0042 5.3 4.1 1.38 0.0042 5.3 4.1 Moment (t-m)
m)

1 1.232 0.0041 6.1 4.8 1.23 0.0041 6.1 4.8 8.0

1.2 1.125 0.0040 6.8 5.5 1.12 0.0040 6.8 5.5


1.4 1.041 0.0039 7.5 6.2 1.04 0.0039 7.5 6.2 6.0
1.5 1.006 0.0039 7.8 6.5 1.0062 0.0039 7.8 6.5
1.8 0.918 0.0038 8.8 7.5 0.9185 0.0038 8.8 7.5
4.0
2.1 0.850 0.0037 9.7 8.4 0.8504 0.0037 9.7 8.4
2.4 0.795 0.0036 10.5 9.3 0.7954 0.0036 10.5 9.3
2.0
2.7 0.750 0.0036 11.3 10.2 0.7499 0.0036 11.3 10.2
3 0.711 0.0035 12.1 11.0 0.7115 0.0035 12.1 11.0 H-M Curve

3.3 0.678 0.0035 12.8 11.8 0.6784 0.0035 12.8 11.8 0.0
2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0 11.0 12.0 13.0 14.0 15.0
3.6 0.649 0.0035 13.5 12.6 0.6495 0.0035 13.5 12.6
Lateral Resistance H (ton)

By: Vu Tran Khoa


Phone: 0968319168
5. Vertical Displacement:
LP: Pile embedment length = 35000 mm
Concrete, fc' = 800 kg/cm2
Ep: Young modulus of pile = 41897.774 MPa
Average SPT-N at Pile Point = 21 21.0
E'S: Modulus at Pile Point = 58.8 MPa
G'L: Shear modulus at pile point = 22.615 Mpa
Average SPT-N at pile embedment LP/2 = 11
E'S: Modulus at at pile embedment LP/2 = 31.0 MPa
G'L/2:Shear modulus at pile embedment LP/2 = 11.926 MPa
rO: Effective pile radius in units of LP = 200.000 mm
Pile shape = Round
rm = K∗ρ∗LP(1-µ) = 32300.008 mm
K= 2.500
ρ= 0.527
Pile-to-soil stiffness ratio, λ = 1852.623
ξ = G'L/Gb = 1 Friction Pile
ζ = Ln(rm/ro) = 5.085 P - tons
η = ds/db = ro/rbase = 1.000 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 550 600 650 700 750 800 850 900
0
µLP = 2.550 5 S~P
Tanh µLP = 0.988 10
15
P: Pile load = 851 tons 20
25
Poisson’s ratio νs = 0.30 30
35
4η = 40

Settlement - mm
5.714 45
(1−νs)ξ 50
55
Settlement of a single pile ∆HP with an embedment depth Lp is as follows (Solutions presented by Randolph and Worth 1978-1979): 60
65
70
75
80
85
90
95
100
⇒ wt = 40.074 mm 105
110
∆ = PL/EPAP = 56.368 mm 115
120
∆HP = wt + ∆ = 96.441 mm 125

Pb = 15.128 tons
S~P Curve
Pb/Pt = 0.018
400mm-35m-GJ

By: Vu Tran Khoa


Phone: 0968319168
Load Load Pt
S (mm) Pb (ton)
Pmax (tons)
353.11 0.000 117.702 0.000 P - tons P - tons
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900
1.000 0.113 0.018
0.0 0.0
6.000 0.680 0.107 5.0 S~P 1.0 Pt~Pb
11.000 1.247 0.196 10.0
15.0 2.0
16.000 1.813 0.284 20.0
25.0 3.0
21.000 2.380 0.373
30.0 4.0
26.000 2.947 0.462
35.0
31.000 3.513 0.551 40.0 5.0
45.0

Pb- tons
Settlement - mm
36.000 4.080 0.640 6.0
50.0
41.000 4.646 0.729 55.0 7.0
60.0
46.000 5.213 0.818 8.0
65.0
51.000 5.780 0.907 70.0 9.0
56.000 6.346 0.996 75.0
10.0
80.0
61.000 6.913 1.084 85.0 11.0
66.000 7.480 1.173 90.0
95.0 12.0
71.000 8.046 1.262 100.0 13.0
76.000 8.613 1.351 105.0
110.0 14.0
81.000 9.179 1.440
115.0 15.0
86.000 9.746 1.529 120.0
125.0 16.0
91.000 10.313 1.618
96.000 10.879 1.707
101.000 11.446 1.795
Vertical Resistance of Individual Pile (tons)
106.000 12.013 1.884
Short-term
111.000 12.579 1.973 Long-term Load Ultimate
Load
deformation Capacity
116.000 13.146 2.062 deformation
121.000 13.713 2.151 10.0 mm 15.0 mm 40.0 mm

126.000 14.279 2.240 102 132 353

131.000 14.846 2.329


136.000 15.412 2.418
141.000 15.979 2.507
146.000 16.546 2.595
151.000 17.112 2.684
156.000 17.679 2.773
161.000 18.246 2.862
166.000 18.812 2.951
171.000 19.379 3.040
176.000 19.946 3.129

By: Vu Tran Khoa


Phone: 0968319168

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy