This document contains an assessment form for a laboratory demonstration on materials characterization. The form evaluates students on their ability to communicate results in a written report based on three learning outcomes and nine program outcomes. It assesses introduction, results, discussion, conclusion, and report format/writing skills on a scale of 0 to 5. The scores on each section are multiplied by their assigned weightage to calculate the total marks for the report.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0 ratings0% found this document useful (0 votes)
77 views1 page
Lab Demo Rubric
This document contains an assessment form for a laboratory demonstration on materials characterization. The form evaluates students on their ability to communicate results in a written report based on three learning outcomes and nine program outcomes. It assesses introduction, results, discussion, conclusion, and report format/writing skills on a scale of 0 to 5. The scores on each section are multiplied by their assigned weightage to calculate the total marks for the report.
Subject Name MATERIALS CHARACTERIZATION Session/Semester 2 – 2019/2020 Name of Student (1) Learning Outcomes Program Outcomes Able to communicate effectively on complex Display good communication skill on matters engineering activities with the engineering community related to materials characterization in a written and with society at large, such as being able to LO3 PO9 report and presentation comprehend and write effective reports and design documentation, make effective presentation, and give and receive clear instructions.
STUDENTS’ NAME LIST: MATRIX NO.
Score Weightage Marks
INTRODUCTION Clear and brief explanation on the introduction. 4 Acceptable explanation about the introduction. 3 Serious deficiencies in the explanation of introduction. 1 3 No introduction in the report. 0 RESULTS Clear explanation of the results. 4 Acceptable explanation of the results. 3 4 Serious deficiencies in the results. 1 No result. 0 DISCUSSION Clear explanation of the discussion. 4 Acceptable explanation of the discussion. 3 3 Serious deficiencies in the discussion. 1 No discussion. 0 CONCLUSION Clear directions and wrap up connections to objectives. 5 Acceptable conclusion. 3 Serious deficiencies in the conclusion 1 1 No conclusion 0 REPORT FORMAT AND WRITING SKILLS Report is well structured and follows standard format. Report is very clear and sentences are easy to understand. Minor grammatical 5 errors. Report is well written but occasionally some points are not easy to understand. Some grammatical errors are present. Standard format is 3 1 used. Report is not well written with many grammatical errors and/or 1 standard format is not followed. TOTAL