Linguistics & Philology
Linguistics & Philology
At any rate, facts weigh more than fancies, and whoever wants to establish the
etymology of a word must first ascertain all the historical facts available with regard
to the place and time of its rise, its earliest signification and syntactic construction,
its diffusion, the synonyms it has ousted, etc. At any rate, facts weigh more than
fancies, and whoever wants to establish the etymology of a word must first
ascertain all the historical facts available with regard to the place and time of its
rise, its earliest signification and syntactic construction, its diffusion, the synonyms
it has ousted, etc. A Samuel Johnson or ‘dictionary- Sam’ is needed.
Linguistics is the systematic, study of the properties of natural language. Philology
seeks to make sense of written texts. The focus of linguistics is the systematic,
scientific study of the properties of natural language. Philology is referring to a
configuration of skills that are geared toward a historical text curatorship that refers
exclusively to written texts. Accordingly philological practice has an affinity with
those historical periods that see themselves as following a greater cultural
moment. Philology’s two-part core task is the identification and restoration of texts
from each cultural past. It establishes a distance with respect to the intellectual
space of hermeneutics and of interpretation as the textual practice that
hermeneutics informs; and lastly, philology plays a particularly important and often
predominant role within those academic disciplines that deal with the most
chronologically and cultural remote segments of the past.
Gumbrecht (2003) identifies five basic philological practices: identifying
fragments, editing texts, writing historical commentaries, historicizing (that is,
the awareness between different historical periods and cultures), and teaching
by using the texts and cultures of the past.
Early modern textual philologists agreed broadly on the kinds of problems to
address and on methods to resolve them. They also developed characteristic
instruments for keeping track of information and for spreading knowledge
(such as commentaries and editions). In this sense textual philology formed a
discipline. However, early modern disciplines were far from exclusive. By the
1920s modern disciplines grew much more strictly subdivided because of
specialization focused on subvariants of philology and its offshoots.
.
Philology has a common mode of knowledge and common methods typified by the
following features. They are:
i) interpretative in method,
ii) comparative in interpretation,
iii) sensitive to cultural, textual or visual contexts,
iv) use historical lineages for understanding,
v) shape products of history (ideas, texts, paintings, institutions, artifacts,
languages) by their historical context.
According to Turner (2014) and Pollock (2015), whereas the philological family is
interpretive, empirical, probable, and historical, philosophy, by contrast, is logical,
deductive, precise in conclusions, and dismissive of change over time.
o Linguistics deals with how the language works, and philology tries to make
sense of what texts mean.
o Linguistics and philology should and do serve each other, but the disciplines
of linguistics and philology are quite different.
o Philology can involve all manner of study and background—whatever you
need to make sense of the words that have been put together in a particular
context.
o The object of linguistic study is language (and languages); the object of
philology is making sense of texts. (Edward Greenstein, BarIlan).
...The study of the philologist is the written word, and his particular concern the
structure and history of languages, while the study of the linguist is speech, and
his particular concern the use of sound to convey meaning. Languages were
spoken for thousands of years before anyone thought of writing them down, so to
that extent the raw material of the linguist came into existence first, but language
study did not begin until languages had been written down...the proper study of
the philologist is the written word, and his particular concern the structure and
history of languages. The proper study of the linguist is speech, and his particular
concern the use of sound to convey meaning. Languages were spoken for years
before anyone thought of writing them down, so the raw material of the linguist
came into existence first, language study began after writing began.