The Deep Grammar of Augustine S Convers PDF
The Deep Grammar of Augustine S Convers PDF
VOL. LXX
Edited by
MARKUS VINZENT
Volume 18:
St Augustine and his Opponents
PEETERS
LEUVEN – PARIS – WALPOLE, MA
2013
Table of Contents
ABSTRACT
In light of the growing consensus that the doctrine of creatio ex nihilo is foundational
for Augustine’s thought, it would be fruitful to consider more fully its role in the Con-
fessions, especially its role in how Augustine understands his conversion in Book
Eight. In this short communication, I will argue that Augustine situates his conversion
narrative within the context of the Trinity’s creative act. His understanding of the onto-
logical distinction between God and the world as well as the creational notion of imita-
tion are the keys to understanding this in Book Eight. They make up the deep grammar
of his conversion story. For Augustine, the Word is the Image of the Father, the perfect
Imitation, through whom all things are made from nothing in a trinitarian act of crea-
tio, conversio, formatio. All things, then, imitate, in varying degrees, the perfect Imita-
tion because they bear the mark of this creative act in their ontological make up. In
Book Eight, God puts before Augustine a series of exempla to imitate – Victorinus,
Anthony, the two agentes in rebus, the children of Lady Chastity – who are presented
as men and women converted through and con-formed to the Incarnate Word, that is,
they are presented as those who have been re-created in Christ by imitating the Imita-
tion. Through these re-created imitators, Augustine sees what he was created to be and
is led by the Word into imitation of the Word, who effects his conversion and forma-
tion, thereby re-creating him after the pattern of his original creation.
2
See Marie-Anne Vannier, Les Confessions de Saint Augustin (Paris, 2007); Robert McMahon,
Prayerful Ascent: An Essay on the Literary Form of the Confessions (Athens, 1989); Luigi
Pizzolato, Le ‘Confessioni’ di Sant’Agostino: Da biografia a ‘confessio’ (Milan, 1968). See also
Jared Ortiz, Creation in Saint Augustine’s Confessions (Diss. Catholic University of America,
2012).
3
Book Eight is the dramatic center, but not the center in other ways. For one illuminating
suggestion on the structure of the Confessions, see Frederick Crosson, ‘Structure and Meaning in
St. Augustine’s Confessions’, in The Augustinian Tradition, ed. Gareth Matthews (Berkeley,
1999), 27-38. Crosson deftly illumines Augustine’s creation insight about the non-competition
between God and the world and shows how this understanding determines the structure and
meaning of the Confessions.
4
See Aug., conf. 4.4.7-11.17.
5
See, for example, conf. 3.6.10.
6
See Rom. 1:20: ‘the invisible things of God are understood through the things that are
made’ (‘invisibilia dei per ea quae facta sunt intellecta’). This verse (with slight variation) occurs
six times in the Confessions: 7.10.16; 7.17.23 (2x); 7.20.26; 10.6.10; 13.21.31.
7
Aug., conf. 8.1.2: ‘contestante universa creatura inveneram te creatorem nostrum et ver-
bum tuum apud te deum tecumque unum deum, per quod creasti omnia.’ Latin references to the
Confessions come from James O’Donnell, Augustine: Confessions, 3 vols. (Oxford, 1992). All
translations are my own.
8
See Aug., conf. 7.10.16, the crucial passage where Augustine comes to the distinction
between God and the world for the first time. Importantly, Augustine thinks that creation also
reveals the co-equality of the Word, though it seems to be silent on the Holy Spirit.
The Deep Grammar of Augustine’s Conversion 235
being in the world.9 For example, those who ask what God was doing before
he created the world10 and those who imagine God as a great being who cre-
ates at a distance from himself11 make God subject to time and space, that is,
they make him a being among other beings, albeit a great and powerful one.
But, as Augustine says in Book 13, God does ‘not exist in a certain way, but
he is is’, non aliquo modo est, sed est est.12 By reduplicating the word est,
Augustine invokes Exodus 3:14 and suggests that God is simply, without qual-
ification. All creatures exist in a certain way – the way God made them – but
God is not a part of creation, so he does not exist in a certain way or as a
certain kind of thing. God is est itself, sheer is. This is true of the Son as well.
He is born of God’s substance and so is the perfect Image and Likeness of the
Father.13 This means that, while he is distinct from the Father (because he is
not the Father, but the Son), he shares the est of the Father. This understanding
of God’s divinity means that God is utterly transcendent to the world he cre-
ated while, at the same time, being wholly and intimately present to it without
competing with it in any way.14 God is, as Augustine says, ‘most hidden and
most present’ (secretissime et praesentissime).15
Creation, on the other hand, is not born of God’s substance, but is created
from nothing. It is therefore distinct and, at least initially, unlike God.16 For
Augustine, creation can only be like God if it turns toward him, if, in Augus-
tine’s words, it ‘converts’.17 According to Augustine, God creates all things
from nothing in a threefold, simultaneous trinitarian act which he describes
under the terms creatio, conversio, and formatio.18 ‘In the beginning, God
created heaven and earth’ (Gen. 1:1) – this refers to the creation of formless
9
This is a temptation not always resisted in Augustine scholarship either. Vernon Bourke, in
Augustine’s View of Reality (Villanova, 1964), speaks of a ‘triple-layered scheme of reality. At
the top is God, in the middle is the human soul, and at the bottom is the world of bodies. Apart
from these three levels … there are no other general types of beings’ (3). Robert O’Connell also
speaks of a ‘three-tiered universe’ for which he provides a diagram, an image he calls the Omnia,
‘the all things’. See his Soundings in St. Augustine’s Imagination (New York, 1994), 21, and
Images of Conversion in St. Augustine’s Confessions (New York, 1996), 105-06. Bourke and
O’Connell each make God the highest being within the universe, thereby (perhaps unwittingly)
reducing him to one being among other beings. Their discussions on this point have been fol-
lowed by Leo Ferrari, ‘Cosmology’ and Ronald H. Nash, ‘Wisdom’, in Augustine through the
Ages: An Encyclopedia (Grand Rapids, 1999), 246-8 and 885-6, respectively.
10
See Aug., conf. 11.10.12.
11
See Aug., conf. 12.27.37.
12
conf. 13.31.46. James O’Donnell, Augustine: Confessions III (Oxford, 1992), 411, suggests
the translation ‘he is “he is”’.
13
See Aug., vera rel. 34.63, 36.66, 43.81.
14
This is the meaning of Augustine’s oft-repeated phrase, ubique totus (conf. 1.3.3, 6.3.4);
see also, ep. 187.5.16: ‘God is everywhere present through his divinity’ (‘ubique esse deum per
diuinitatis praesentiam’).
15
conf. 1.4.4.
16
See conf. 13.2.3.
17
See conf. 13.2.2-3.
18
See conf. 13.1.1-4.5.
236 J. ORTIZ
matter from nothing.19 God calls this formless matter back to Himself through
His Word (revocatio): ‘Let there be light’ (Gen. 1:3). This calling back
through the Word constitutes the conversion of formless matter from unlike-
ness to God to some kind of likeness.20 In the Holy Spirit, the formless crea-
ture simultaneously receives its form as whatever it is supposed to be – ‘and
there was light’ (Gen. 1:3). ‘In this conversion and formation’, Augustine
says, ‘the creature, in its own way, imitates God the Word’.21 For rational
creatures, formation means illumination which, Augustine says, means being
made in God’s image and likeness and having the capacity to participate in
the light of his wisdom.22
Now, what does all this have to do with Augustine’s conversion in Book
Eight? The very fact that Augustine is speaking of conversion at all puts his
narrative in the context of creation. All conversions, according to Augustine,
have their foundation in God’s original creative act, for God re-creates in the
same way he creates.23 In sinning, we have turned away from God, aversio
instead of conversio, and, in a very real sense, this un-makes us: aversio de-
forms the image of God in us and dissipates the unity of our being, making us
like that formless abyss out of which we were created. But God calls us back
again through the Word, now Incarnate, who converts us, and in the Spirit re-
forms us after the pattern of our original creation. In Book Eight, Augustine
presents a kind of ‘interior view’ of this converting and reforming Trinity who
calls Augustine to enter into the Word, that perfect Image toward which he
was made.
Book Eight begins with a conflicted Augustine hearing a number of conver-
sion stories after which, he says, he was ‘on fire for imitating’ (exarsi ad
imitandum).24 This phrase gives an insight into how Augustine understands the
process of his conversion, for imitation is a category of created being and the
language of ‘fire’ points us to the creative role of the Holy Spirit (that is, to
formatio). All things are created through the Son, the true Image of God, and
so all things imitate God because they bear the creative mark of the Image
through whom they were made.25 They are like God because they are created
19
See conf. 12.8.8.
20
See conf. 13.2.2.
21
Gen. litt. 1.4.9.
22
See conf. 13.2.3.
23
See conf. 5.7.13 where Augustine says that we are saved by ‘your hand remaking what You
have made’ (‘manum tuam reficientem quae fecisti’); see lib. arb. 3.7 and 3.22.
24
conf. 8.5.10.
25
It is important to note that the Son does not convert. Thus, creatures do not imitate the
Son’s turning, but bear the mark of the Son’s perfect Likeness so that they reflect God in some
way. Creatures convert by being made like God; they are turned by being created through the
Word. Compare Plotinus, Ennead V 2.1, where the Nous does, in fact, convert. It is unclear
whether Augustine knew this passage, but either way it is clear that he has a different understand-
ing than Plotinus on this point. In Augustine’s metaphysics, the notion of the Son converting
would be ontologically Arian.
The Deep Grammar of Augustine’s Conversion 237
through the Likeness. Thus, imitation is written into the very structure of
things; it is what makes a thing like God and enables it to exist as that thing.
Imitation is not only a category of creation, but also of re-creation. Follow-
ing St. Paul, Augustine says that conversion does not begin by imitating Christ
directly, but ‘by imitating the imitators of your Christ’ (imitando imitatores
Christi tui).26 Those who have achieved the imitation of Christ become his
image and thus become imitable images for others; the imitators imitate the
Exemplar and so become examples themselves. In Book Eight, Providence
puts before Augustine a series of examples to imitate – Victorinus, Anthony,
the two government officials, the children of Lady Continence – who are pre-
sented as men and women converted through and con-formed to the Word, that
is, they are presented as those who have been re-created in Christ.27 The Holy
Spirit sets Augustine on fire to imitate them, for the Spirit is that bond of love
between the one imitating and the one imitated.28 By inspiring rightly ordered
desire, the Holy Spirit re-forms the distended soul, focusing it on God (inten-
tio), ‘stretching’ it (extensio), and thus ‘making room’ for God to enter in.29 It
is no accident, then, that the last examples offered for Augustine’s imitation
are the children of Lady Continence, for continence is that reforming virtue by
which, Augustine says, ‘we are collected together and brought back into the
One from whom we have been dissipated into many things’.30
The rest of Augustine’s conversion story is well known: he struggles,
weeps, hears children playing, reads the Scriptures, and is flooded with light.31
But what has happened here? The Word being imitated by others prepares
Augustine to hear the Word speaking through the children’s words, which
leads to the Word of the Scriptures, which leads to the Word made flesh. In
each of these temporal events, the unchanging Word beckons Augustine to
conversion, to increased likeness to Christ. When Augustine hears the tolle
lege, he remembers Anthony’s conversion and is moved to imitate him.32 This
detail sheds light on the ‘mechanics’ of how creation is operative in Augus-
tine’s conversion: the examples put before Augustine form his memory so that
he begins not to be ‘conformed to this world, but reformed in [his] mind …
Thus, a man is renewed in the knowledge of God according to the image of
26
Aug., conf. 13.21.31.
27
See Lewis Ayres, ‘Into the Poem of the Universe: Exempla, Conversion, and Church in
Augustine’s Confessiones’, Zeitschrift für Antikes Christentum 13 (2009), 263-81.
28
Compare Aug., en. Ps. 37.27: ‘By desiring [Christ] and imitating his passion, we are
renewed’ (‘desiderando eum et passionem eius imitando renovamur’).
29
See conf. 11.29.39, 10.1.1, 1.5.6.
30
conf. 10.29.40: ‘per continentiam quippe conligimur et redigimur in unum, a quo in multa
defluximus.’ See also conf. 13.34.49, Augustine’s commentary – in the form of an allegorical
interpretation of the creation story – on imitation leading to continence.
31
conf. 8.12.29.
32
conf. 8.12.29.
238 J. ORTIZ
him, who created him’.33 The examples participate in the Light and thus
become a light which can shed light for others. By providing new, light-filled
memories, the examples illumine Augustine’s mind so he can see the world in
a new light. The process of reformatio has begun. Augustine is now able to
rightly interpret the children’s words. He interprets them as a divine command
to read the Scriptures and when he sees the Way in the call of the scriptural
Word he is further illumined: it was, he says, ‘as if a light of surety was
infused into my heart’.34 Augustine is exhorted to ‘put on Christ’, to be bap-
tized, which will incorporate him into the Body of Christ, the Church,35 draw-
ing him ever closer to that Image toward which he was made.
Augustine’s description in Book Eight of how God interacts with the world
arises from his understanding of creation. Since God ‘is is,’ he is not a compet-
ing cause in the world; he acts in the world without violating the natural integ-
rity of its events or Augustine’s will. The actors act of their own volition and
the events occur from natural causes while at the same time God works through
them to bring about His own ends. God does not manipulate Augustine’s heart
to get him to convert; rather, through grace, God frees it so that it can be fully
at work while he is fully at work in it.36 The interaction between temporal
events and the eternal God as portrayed in Book Eight only makes sense in
light of Augustine’s understanding of creation.
Augustine’s understanding of creation has shed light on both the metaphys-
ics and mechanics of his narrative in Book Eight. Yet, Augustine’s conversion
and re-formation are not finished in the garden; there is an important sacra-
mental dimension which confirms the process begun there: baptism completes
the process of conversion, making one a ‘new creation’ (2Cor. 5:17),37 while
the Eucharist moves one along the scale of likeness to Christ in the lifelong
process of re-forming the image of God.38 Baptism incorporates one into the
Body of Christ, while the Eucharist con-forms one to the heart of that Body. It
is this ecclesial heart which, Augustine says in the opening lines, was created
33
conf. 13.22.32: ‘nolite conformari huic saeculo, sed reformamini in novitate mentis vestrae
… ita homo renovatur in agnitione dei secundum imaginem eius, qui creavit eum.’ These two
sentences are based on Rom. 12:2 and Col. 3:10, respectively. See also conf. 13.13.14, 13.23.33,
13.26.40, 13.34.49.
34
conf. 8.12.29: ‘quasi luce securitatis infusa cordi meo omnes dubitationis tenebrae
diffugerunt.’ This language clearly refers to illumination, formatio for rational creatures.
35
See conf. 9.6.14.
36
See conf. 9.1.1. Compare spir. et litt. 30.52: ‘Do we, then, by grace empty free choice? Let
that be far from our thoughts! Rather, we establish free choice even more’ (‘Liberum ergo
arbitrium evacuamus per gratiam? Absit, sed magis liberum arbitrium statuimus’).
37
See ep. 98.9, where Augustine calls baptism the ‘sacrament of conversion’ (‘conversionis
sacramentum’).
38
See conf. 10.3.4 and 10.4.5. Also, see Gerhart Ladner, The Idea of Reform: Its Impact on
Christian Thought and Action in the Age of the Fathers (Cambridge, 1959), 32.
The Deep Grammar of Augustine’s Conversion 239
for God and longs for rest.39 This rest is begun in this life and will be accom-
plished in the next when the Church, like the bread and wine, is definitively
taken up and trans-formed into God.40 The Church, both nourished by and
mystically identical to the Eucharist, will be transformed into what she eats:
‘I am the food of grown men; increase and you will eat Me. You will not
change Me into you as food of your flesh, but you will be changed into Me’.41
39
See Aug., conf. 1.1.1. I understand the cor nostrum of this line to be an allusion to the
sursum cor of the Eucharistic prayer (see conf. 12.16.23 and 13.7.8). See also s. 229.3: ‘Lift up
the heart! The whole life of true Christians: Lift up the heart’ (‘sursum cor. tota uita christiano-
rum uerorum, sursum cor’); civ. Dei 10.3: ‘When our heart is up to the Lord, it is His altar’
(‘cum ad illum sursum est, eius est altare cor nostrum’; also, s. 25.7, 53.13, 68.4, 227; vera rel.
3.5; s. Den. 6.3.
40
Compare s. 272 and s. 229.1.
41
conf. 7.10.16: ‘cibus sum grandium: cresce et manducabis me. nec tu me in te mutabis
sicut cibum carnis tuae, sed tu mutaberis in me.’ This passage, importantly, occurs in the context
of Augustine’s coming to the truth of creation for the first time. Augustine presents it as a revela-
tion of the deep meaning of creation. See also s. 272: ‘So if you are the Body of Christ and its
members, it is your mystery that has been placed on the Lord’s table; you receive your own
mystery … Be what you see, and receive what you are’ (‘si ergo uos estis corpus christi et mem-
bra, mysterium uestrum in mensa dominica positum est: mysterium uestrum accipitis … Estote
quod videtis, et accipite quod estis’).
STUDIA PATRISTICA
PAPERS PRESENTED AT THE SIXTEENTH INTERNATIONAL
CONFERENCE ON PATRISTIC STUDIES
HELD IN OXFORD 2011
Edited by
MARKUS VINZENT
Volume 1
STUDIA PATRISTICA LIII
FORMER DIRECTORS
Volume 2
STUDIA PATRISTICA LIV
Volume 3
STUDIA PATRISTICA LV
Volume 4
STUDIA PATRISTICA LVI
REDISCOVERING ORIGEN
Volume 5
STUDIA PATRISTICA LVII
Volume 6
STUDIA PATRISTICA LVIII
Volume 7
STUDIA PATRISTICA LIX
Volume 8
STUDIA PATRISTICA LX
Volume 9
STUDIA PATRISTICA LXI
Volume 10
STUDIA PATRISTICA LXII
HISTORICA
Volume 11
STUDIA PATRISTICA LXIII
BIBLICA
Volume 12
STUDIA PATRISTICA LXIV
ASCETICA
LITURGICA
ORIENTALIA
CRITICA ET PHILOLOGICA
Volume 13
STUDIA PATRISTICA LXV
APOCRYPHA
Julian Petkov, University of Heidelberg, Germany
Techniques of Disguise in Apocryphal Apocalyptic Literature:
Bridging the Gap between ‘Authorship’ and ‘Authority’.....................241
22 Table of Contents
Volume 14
STUDIA PATRISTICA LXVI
CLEMENT OF ALEXANDRIA
Jana Plátová, Centre for Patristic, Medieval and Renaissance Texts, Olo-
mouc, Czech Republic
Die Fragmente des Clemens Alexandrinus in den griechischen und
arabischen Katenen...............................................................................3
Volume 15
STUDIA PATRISTICA LXVII
CAPPADOCIAN WRITERS
Volume 16
STUDIA PATRISTICA LXVIII
Volume 17
STUDIA PATRISTICA LXIX
LATIN WRITERS
NACHLEBEN
Volume 18
STUDIA PATRISTICA LXX