Chapter 4 Meetings Skills PDF
Chapter 4 Meetings Skills PDF
Chapter 4
Role of Meetings
A well organised, well-aimed and well-led meeting can be extremely effective in many
different contexts.
Executive decision making; for example, by a group of directors, managers, or
government officials.
The relaying of decisions and instructions (downward ‘briefings’)
The provision of advice and information for management planning and decision-making
(upward ‘briefings’ or reporting)
The participation in problem-solving discussions by consultation with people in different
departments or fields, such as through task force, working party, committee or quality
circle.
Brainstorming: free exchanges with a view to generate new approaches and ideas.
10
‘Nailing colours to the mast’ Meetings can also be used to put individuals on the spot in
public (and in the written minutes of the meeting) They can enforce commitment, or at
least indicate where the battle lines are drawn.
Inspiration. Some meetings can be inspirational, if they are used to persuade, cajole or
encourage a sense of values.
Unification: Bringing people together underlines the fact that they belong to the same
organisation, and in theory should be working to the same purpose.
Structure of Meetings
A meeting generally conforms or responds to a measure of organisation and procedure.
There is the chairperson or least an organiser, who guides the proceedings of the meeting
and aims to maintain order. A meeting can hardly function efficiently if everybody talks
at once and nobody listens.
There is often a sequence of business, or at least of speeches, to express points of view or
reach decisions on the common purpose of the meeting. It is not essential to formalise this
point with an agenda, but meetings usually do have one.
The purpose of the meeting is achieved by reaching some decision or expression of
opinion at the end of the discussion. In some circumstances this may lead to taking a vote
to determine what is the majority view.
Types of Meetings
An informal meeting, such as might be called from time to time by a department head or
working party, may take the form of a discussion ‘chaired’ by a leader, and informally
documented: notes handed round or taken during the meeting, a summary of arguments and
decisions reached provided afterwards.
Formal meetings, however, are governed by strict rules and conventions (and generate
formal documentation) for the announcement, planning, conduct and recording of the
proceedings. The documents are:
Notice: the announcement of and ‘invitation’ to the meeting.
Agenda: the list of items of business to be discussed at the meeting.
Minutes: the written record of a meeting, approved by those present.
The chairperson
The chairperson of a formal meeting will have complex responsibilities. He or she has to:
Ensure that correct procedure is observed in convening and constituting the meeting and
in the conduct of the debate. In the event of enquiries or complaints regarding procedure
(points of order) he must give immediate ruling.
Preserve order and harmony (or at least courtesy), and dealing firmly with irrelevance,
long-windedness, interruptions and improper language.
Guide the meeting through its business, making sure that each item is valid within the
regulations and stated purpose of the meeting (as expressed by the notice and agenda).
Make sure that only those entitled to speak do so, and that there is adequate discussion of
each item.
11
Ascertain the ‘sense of the meeting’ (the consensus view or decision of the meeting) by
summing up, or putting the issue to the vote and declaring the result.
Checking and signing the minutes of the meeting.
Qualities of a Chairperson
There are a number of recognised qualities of a good chairperson.
The chairperson has to be able to give immediate ruling points of dispute or doubt, the
chair should have:
- sound knowledge of the relevant regulations
- an ability to make up his mind without dithering
- skills in communicating his ruling clearly, but tactfully and in a courteous manner.
The chairperson has to be, and be seen to be, impartial, giving all parties a reasonable
opportunity to express their views, including any minority interests at the meeting.
The Secretary
The secretary is the administrative support for the meeting. Duties of a secretary may include:
fixing the date and time of the meeting
choosing and preparing the location of the meeting
preparing and issuing various documents
assisting the chairman to take down notes
preparing minutes, acting on and communicating decisions.
The Quorum
A minimum number of persons called a quorum must be present, usually throughout the
meeting. By definition, a meeting usually requires at least two individuals to be present.
The notice of meeting will be prepared in advance and circulated in the form of a
memorandum (memo).
The agenda of the meeting is often included with the notice, to give participants a guide to
the business to be discussed and the preparations they will need to make. The minutes of the
previous meeting may also be attached so that any objection or queries relating to them may
be prepared in advance of the present meeting.
12
To: The Annual Dinner Committee
From: Lau, secretary
Subject: Notice of meeting
The next meeting for the Annual Dinner Committee will be held at the
Conference Room on Thursday, 22 May 2003 at 9 a.m.
Agenda: reports from the different units on the preparation for the annual
dinner.
Attached is the minutes of the previous meeting for your perusal.
Lau
For a formal meeting, the agenda will usually contain the following elements:
Membership: this is an optional item, which allows the chair to introduce new members
or allude to retirements or resignations.
Apologies for absence: once the meeting has been declared open, apologies sent to the
secretary by members unable to attend are read out.
Minutes of the last meeting. The previous minutes are read out, or have more probably
been sent in advance to the members. It is then considered whether or not the wording of
those minutes is accurate in fact and implication, and a true record of the meeting. If so,
the chair signs the minutes as approved; if not, amendments may be made.
The minutes may be signed by the chairperson without discussion, if the members
have already seen the minutes and they are fairly routine and cause no difficulties.
The minutes are then said to have been ‘taken as read’ and signed.
Matters arising: if a situation has developed or action taken in response to the previous
meeting, the fact should be reported. This item should not be an excuse for disputes to be
re-opened.
Fresh business: this may include plans to be made, reports to be delivered and discussed,
or particular proposals to be debated and decided on. The chairperson should avoid a
lengthy list of matters, which will allow only superficial coverage of each – or a very long
meeting. It will be up to the chairperson to decide whether to get routine business ‘out of
the way’ first or whether to tackle complex/important matters early, while the members
are fresh.
Any other business (AOB): if the topic has been overlooked, or has risen between the
drafting of the agenda and the meeting, it may be dealt with at this point. AOB should not
be considered an excuse to spring items on an unprepared meeting. If the matter is
sufficiently important, it may be carried over to the next meeting.
Date of the next meeting: the meeting is then formally declared closed.
13
Chairperson’s Agenda
The Chairperson’s agenda is slightly different from the one circulated to the members.
Each item on the agenda is followed by brief notes such as, information updates,
background detail, explanations etc.
This means that the chairperson is fully prepared to provide all necessary information to
the meeting, and can also conduct the proceedings with tact and authority.
For the meeting held at the Conference room on Thursday, 22 May 2003 at 9 a.m.
1. Membership:
Mr Sim would be the addition to the stage management team
4. Matters arising:
Item 2: Ms June has agreed to present the prizes at this year’s annual dinner
Conduct of Meeting
A meeting, which has been properly convened, may only proceed to business if it has:
a chairperson
enough quorum
The proposal put to a meeting is called a motion. It should have someone to propose it and
another to second it (although this is not essential). If a decision is decided, the motion has to
be put to a vote. If it is ‘carried’ (or approved) the motion becomes a resolution (or decision).
The original motion is sometimes amended (or altered) in the course of debate and may then
be carried in the meeting as a ‘substantive motion’. An amendment is a proposal to alter a
motion, which has been put before a meeting, but has not been put to the vote. Any
amendment made must be agreed by the meeting. An amendment, which simply adds words
to the original motion, is called an addendum.
14
Checklist: Motion
A motion:
It must:
Adjournment
An adjournment is an interruption of the proceedings of a meeting before they have been
completed. It may be:
an adjournment of a particular debate, to be resumed later in the same meeting or
an adjournment of the meeting itself, with a view to its resumption at some later date.
However, it is not possible to postpone or cancel a formal meeting, once a notice to convene
it has been issued. If there are reasons for not holding it at the appointed time, the correct
procedure is to hold the meeting but propose a motion for an adjournment before any
business is done. The secretary may issue an advance notice to members that the adjournment
will be proposed, so that they do not waste time by coming to the meeting.
The debate
If there is more than one item in the agenda, and each is to be considered and voted
separately, the chairperson’s task is to guide the meeting through a sequence of short debates.
15
Interruptions must be controlled. If someone seeks to intervene in the debate, he must be
told to wait until it is his turn to speak, or until the relevant motion comes before the
meeting.
As a general rule no one may speak more than once in a debate on a particular subject.
There are three main exceptions.
- the person who propose a motion is sometimes permitted to reply to the debate before
the vote is taken.
- The Chairperson may request a speaker to give an explanation.
- Anyone may raise a point of order at any time, even interrupting the speaker.
The Chairperson may find it tactful to allow a person who has no right to speak a brief
opportunity to make his point.
The chairperson may have to cut short the debate (since there could be a number of
remaining items on the agenda) if he considers that every point of view has had enough of
an airing. The Chairperson may call on the person who made the proposal to reply to the
debate or sum it up him or herself.
Voting
It is the means by which participants in a formal meeting inform the chairperson of their
decision with regard to a motion. There are methods of voting and they are the:
Showing of hands. At the invitation of the Chairperson, those ‘in favour’ raise their hand
and ‘Those against’ would do the same, and the Chairperson declares the result by the
count of hands raised. This is a ‘one man, one vote’ system.
16
Having a poll. Each person entitled to vote does so in writing indicating the number of
votes, which he is entitled to cast. This is not necessarily ‘one man, one vote’.
Having a ballot. This is similar to the vote but the individual voting paper is put into a
ballot box so that it can be counted later.
A division. Those present rise from their place and walk to separate ‘lobbies’ where their
numbers are counted by ‘tellers’ and reported to the Chairperson. (a method used in the
synod of the Church of England)
Once the Chairperson declared the results, it should be entered in the minutes. Once the item
of business is concluded, it cannot be raised again, nor the debate re-opened, in the same
meeting.
Minutes
It is a written record of a meeting and it is extremely important if it is to be an effective
means of communication in an organisation. The function of the minutes is to:
- be a point of reference
- check on ill-considered contributions
Format of Minutes
The format varies but the following is the common components in a minute.
1. Start with the time and place of the meeting
2. List those present
3. Work through the items on the agenda by using numbers, headings and giving spacing
and indentation so as to help readers refer to it easily.
4. Get the names and designations of speakers right, and make sure that each reported
statement is clearly attributed to the appropriate individual.
5. Use a wide right-hand margin labelled ‘Action’ and make notes in this margin the name
of individuals to whom the follow-up action has been delegated.
6. Finish with the Chairperson’s signature, name and designation.
Present:
1. Ms Lyn Chong – (Chairperson)
2. Mr. Allen Koo – (Secretary)
3. Mr. Rama Chandran – (Treasurer)
4. Mdm Tengku Lydia Tengku Ahmad
5. Mr Rahmat Roslan
Absent:-
1. Mr Oh Beng See (with apology)
17
Minutes of Meeting
18
Prepared by: Approved by:
…………………… ………………………
Allen Koo Lyn Chong
Secretary Chairperson
19
Elements of Effective Persuasive Speaking
Ethos, Pathos, Logos
The Roman orator Cicero identified five elements of persuasive speaking: (1) inventing or
discovering evidence and arguments, (2) organizing them, (3) styling them artistically, (4)
memorizing them, and finally, (5) delivering them skillfully.
The Roman theorist Quintillion said, “A persuader has to be a ‘good man’ as well as a good
speaker.”
Aristotle defined rhetoric as the faculty of observing the available means of persuasion in any
given case.
Aristotle was a remarkable teacher. His father had been a court physician, so Aristotle received
the finest education. He studied with Plato for twenty years and was then selected by
Alexander the Great to be the secretary of education. Aristotle developed a fantastic cataloging
system and used the methods of Platonic dialogue. He became the first great librarian and
researcher of Greece. Developing his expertise in researching assisted him in writing a book
called Rhetoric, which is the single most important work on the study of speech making.
Aristotle also developed a theory called artistic proofs or appeals. The three major types of
artistic proofs are described below.
1. Ethos is charisma and credibility. The audience perceives all people in some way, so the
ultimate perception would be to have ethos: honesty, knowledge, experience, and a sense of
humor. Aristotle labeled these qualities “reputation.” After ethos is achieved, additional
characteristics, such as voice quality, word choices, eye contact, and gestures become more
familiar.
For example, some public figures like Rosanne Barr, Howard Stern, and Dennis Rodman
intentionally offend their audiences. They seem to have no interest in achieving ethos or a “good
reputation.” On the other hand, Maya Angelou, Bill Cosby, and Stephen Covey have a presence
about them that instills confidence and admiration from almost everyone they encounter. These
people have all of the traits that create ethos, or “credibility” and “charisma.”
2. Pathos is completely related to the emotions. It creates strong appeal to the passionate side
of our human nature. An example of persuading through pathos is the McDonald’s commercial
that shows a young boy in the starting blocks at a track meet and then shows him running as an
adult Olympian and looking back into the face of the child he was. Persuasion through pathos
appeals to the love of our families and other emotional and psychological attachments; it
follows the motto “Reach Out and Touch Someone.” The question that you should ask yourself
is this: “What is the emotional state of the audience or of the individual that I am trying to
reach?”
If you are speaking to a group of recovering alcoholics or abuse victims or anyone who has
experienced the loss of a loved one, you can reach out to them through your own personal
experiences. What is created between the two communicators is pathos.
3. Logos appeals to the rational part of a human being. When speakers rely on logos, he or she
uses things like testimony, statistics, data, and examples to persuade. The audience then has
the opportunity to process this information and draw some conclusions.
So how does the persuader fit into all of this? The persuader must have ethos, using powerful
language, eye contact, and strategically planned gestures. Also, the persuader must assess
pathos, or the emotional state of the audience and then give reassurance to the audience that
he or she is credible and connected to the emotions of the audience. Lastly, the persuader must
use logos and appeal to the rational sides of his or her listeners. This enables the audience to be
able to predict the outcome or come to a conclusion.
Help the audience remember your message by using vivid word pictures and a
striking conclusion
The following word picture would make a great start to a speech about fire safety:
Visualize this: You are driving a hunter green Ford Explorer down a mountain path with
beautiful tall pines on either side and a crystal clear blue sky above. You can see a deer peering
through the trees and squirrels scampering after acorns. You can hear a mountain stream as it
flows down the canyon with you. Wanting to experience the outside air, you roll down the
window. To your dismay, a strong smell of burning trees hits your nostrils. A good exercise to
get you thinking in a visual sense is to sit down with a piece of paper and pencil and literally
draw the content of your speech. If you are going to talk about a Ford Explorer and a forest fire,
you can incorporate all of this in one picture. You could also draw the positive and the negative
aspects of your speech content. A positive image would involve using water to put out the fire; a
negative image would be watching the fire continue to burn out of control. It is your personal
call as to where you want to take the image. This all has to do with how you feel at the moment.
You may feel cynical, picked on, and mad at the world. You can use that intensity to your
advantage by funneling it into something vivid and striking. But you must always have
integrity—you cannot leave the audience in the negative. You must give them a resolution.
Ensure enduring change by stirring deep feelings and connecting them with
powerful reasons
You must give your audience compelling reasons to change their attitudes and above all to take
the risks associated with taking action. You have already established to your audience the need
for change (for example, the need to be in good health, to invest their money wisely, or to
enhance their spiritual paths). Now this is where you use personal experience and testimony to
validate your strong belief of taking action. You must use personal experience to really
connect with your audience; if you don’t, it will only be hearsay. If you can show how your
experience has made a personal impact, it will empower the audience for change. If you state
that it happened to someone else, then the audience will say, “Good for her. Why isn’t she the
one talking to us?” They want to hear things from a firsthand source. Everyone has the right to
express his or her opinions. This holds true regardless of how unpopular the topic may be. The
audience has a responsibility to hear the persuasion and make a choice.
As a speech instructor, I feel very strongly that if a controversial topic is presented, the
audience should show respect to the speaker through open body position—in other words,
arms unfolded, legs uncrossed, and eye contact with the speaker. Next the audience has a
responsibility to listen instead of simply filtering out the things they don’t want to hear. A
disrespectful audience creates a feeling of chaos and commotion in the room, and the speaker
feels that he or she has lost the audience and cannot recover them. How sad that an experience
like this can affect a person’s desire to be involved in public forums, or even to give public
opinion. Because persuasive speaking involves emotions, it carries a heavy ethical burden and
is therefore different from informative speaking.
Guidelines for Speaking to Inform
We offer ten guidelines for the informative speech. Use them as a checklist during your speech
preparation, and you will deliver an excellent informative speech.
Be Objective
One of the most important criteria for an informative speech is objectivity. If you take a stand, you
become a persuader. Informative speakers are committed to presenting a balanced view. People
representing political parties, charitable organizations, business associations, and special interest
groups are understandably committed to the objectives and policies of their groups. Your research
should take into account all perspectives.
If, as you develop and practice your speech, you find yourself becoming a proponent of a particular
viewpoint, you may need to step back and assess whether your orientation has shifted from
information to persuasion. If you do not think you can make your speech objective, save the topic for
a persuasive speech.
Nothing betrays the image of objectivity that is essential in an informative speech as quickly as the
inappropriate use of language. For example, in an informative speech on the pros and cons of
juvenile curfew laws, one of our students used language that telegraphed his personal opinion on
the issue. Even when explaining the arguments for such laws, he described them as “silly,” “costly,”
and “unenforceable.” In an informative speech, your language should be descriptive, rather than
evaluative or judgmental.
Be Specific
At times we have had students tell us they will deliver a brief informative speech on “sports.” This
topic is far too broad and reflects little or no planning. Many of us know a little about a lot of subjects.
An informative speech gives you the perfect opportunity to fill in the gaps by telling your audience a
lot about a little. Narrow your topic. To help you do that, we have suggested in this chapter that you
focus on specific people, objects, places, activities and events, processes, concepts, conditions, and
issues. Your “sports” topic could be narrowed to sports commentators; the history of AstroTurf;
Forest Hills, former home of the U.S. Open Tennis Championships; competitive team sports and
male bonding; and so on. The more specific you are about your topic, your purpose, and the
materials you use to support your speech, the more time you will save during your research. Your
specific focus will also make your speech easier for the audience to remember.
Be Clear
If you choose your topic carefully and explain it thoroughly, your message should be clear. Do not
choose a topic that is too complex. If your speech topic is Boolean polynomials or the biochemistry
of bovine growth hormone, you run the risk of being too technical for most audiences. You would
never be able to give your audience the background knowledge necessary to understand your
presentation in the limited time you have. At the same time, be careful about using jargon.
Impressing the audience with your vocabulary is counterproductive if they cannot understand your
message. The purpose of informative speaking is not to impress the audience with complex data,
but to communicate information clearly.
Be Accurate
Information that is inaccurate does not inform; it misinforms and has two negative consequences.
First, inaccuracies can hurt your credibility as a speaker. If listeners recognize misstatements, they
may begin to question the speaker’s credibility: “If the speaker’s wrong about that, could there be
other inaccuracies in the speech?” Accurate statements help you develop a positive image or protect
one you have established earlier.
Second, inaccurate information can do potential harm to listeners. Such harm can be mental or
physical. For example, you give an informative speech on the life threatening reactions some people
have to sulfites, a common ingredient in certain food preservatives. Your audience leaves the class
worried about their health and the damage they may have suffered. You neglected to mention that
these reactions are rare. Your misinformation has harmed your audience. If audience members are
unaware of factual errors, they may form beliefs that are not valid or make decisions that are not
wise.
Not only should your information be accurate, but you must accurately cite the sources you used to
develop your speech. Some speakers assume that because they do not take a controversial stand in
an informative speech, they need not cite sources. An informative topic may require fewer sources
than you would use to establish your side of a debatable point. Demonstrating the truth of your ideas
and information is nevertheless important. Also, you must cite the sources for any quotations.
Be Relevant
As you research your topic, you will no doubt discover information that is interesting but not central
to your thesis. Because it is so interesting, you may be tempted to include it. Don’t. If it is not
relevant, leave it out.
One student, Larry, delivered an intriguing informative speech on the Jains, a tribe of monks
in India whose daily life is shaped by reverence for all living things. As you might guess, the
Jains are vegetarians. But they don’t eat vegetables that develop underground because
harvesting them may kill insects in the soil. Larry had done a good deal of research on this
fascinating topic, including his own travels in India. His firsthand knowledge was both a
blessing and a curse. Listening to a speaker who had visited the Jains’s monasteries
certainly made the topic immediate and compelling. But because he knew so much about the
country, Larry included a lot of information about India that was interesting but irrelevant to
his main point. His speech became much too long.
To avoid this problem and to keep yourself on track, write out your central thesis and refer to it
periodically. When you digress from your topic, you waste valuable preparation time, distort the
focus of your speech, and confuse your audience.