This document compares radiographic testing (RT) to alternative non-destructive testing methods such as conventional ultrasound testing (UT), time of flight diffraction (TOFD), and phased array (PAUT). It discusses that while RT is widely used, it has health and safety hazards from ionizing radiation. Newer methods like PAUT and TOFD provide higher probabilities of detection and more accurate assessments without health risks. The document concludes that codes and standards are increasingly accepting PAUT and TOFD as safer and more reliable replacements for RT and conventional UT.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0 ratings0% found this document useful (0 votes)
477 views14 pages
RT VS PAUT - General
This document compares radiographic testing (RT) to alternative non-destructive testing methods such as conventional ultrasound testing (UT), time of flight diffraction (TOFD), and phased array (PAUT). It discusses that while RT is widely used, it has health and safety hazards from ionizing radiation. Newer methods like PAUT and TOFD provide higher probabilities of detection and more accurate assessments without health risks. The document concludes that codes and standards are increasingly accepting PAUT and TOFD as safer and more reliable replacements for RT and conventional UT.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 14
RT vs Conventional UT vs PAUT
Te c h n i c a l & F i n a n c i a l C o m p a r i s o n s Contribution of Radiography….
Flaws in materials can lead to costly remediation and lost productivity.
These flaws can also lead to costly component replacement and process bypasses that create more problems for production and maintenance teams. During World War II, radiography for industrial purposes began to develop, and isotopes such as caesium-137, iridium-192 and cobalt-60 became available for industrial radiography. Fruits of RT but with catch…. Radiographic testing is widely used in a variety of industry sectors including aerospace, power generation, construction, petroleum, chemical and automotive, and for all types of components and parts. The technique is commonly used on welded parts, castings, forgings, composites and is also used for corrosion mapping and the measurement of wall thickness. The benefit of using radiography is that it requires minimum surface preparation and provides a permanent record of testing. Radiographic testing using X-rays and gamma rays are hazardous and as such are controlled by stringent legislation. When radiography carries out in site that you should have complete assurance that all legal requirements and legislative notifications are adhered to, including the transportation of isotopes, protective enclosure barriers and warning systems. Health Hazards of RT…. Since this method uses ionizing radiation, it is important to ensure not only the quality of product, but also the safety of the technician and the general public, as well as the protection of the environment. Improper practice could result in the technician and the public being exposed to a large dose of radiation in just a few seconds. Moreover, contamination from a corroded or damaged source can cause additional radiation hazards to radiography personnel. Therefore, a high degree of care and professionalism is required for radiography work. Financial Hazards of RT…. In 2017, the global radiography test equipment market was valued at USD 858.6 million and is expected to reach a value of USD 1451.12 million by 2023, registering a CAGR of about 9.14% during 2018-2023 (the forecast period). It’s a profitable Industry in the point of Contract companies. But as a Manufacturer & client its a loss per time. Depending on location, preparation for radiographic inspection may require permits and clearing the area of other personnel to ensure they are not accidentally exposed to radiation. Assessing the welding area to be inspected, the technician evaluates the best locations for the x-ray generator and image plate so that the generator and image plate are aligned properly. Financial Hazards of RT…. Frankly Speaking you need to halt your total Production in that specific region in order to perform RT. Which can cause thousands of USD loss per shift. Its also time consuming since total coverage of the component in a single go is not possible, Optimum inspection quality requires the radiation to be directed to the middle of the section being inspected and be normal to the material surface. Exposure time varies depends upon component thickness & Curie strength. Once the image has been captured, the negative needs to be developed and interpreted. The trained technician then examines the negative for subtle variations that indicate any defect, its location, and size. De-laminations and planar cracks can be very difficult to detect using radiography, particularly to untrained technicians. Replacement for RT…. As the restrictions in the use of Industrial Radiography (RT) has increased over the years, the need for alternative weld inspections methods and techniques such as Conventional UT, Time of Flight Diffraction (TOFD) and Phased Array (PA) has become more evident. Where most codes & Standards directly mentioned about RT Replacements while some codes are still in process of establishments. Up until now The direct replacement of RT is Conventional UT. Reason is that Ultrasonic Testing is the only other volumetric Testing method apart from RT. Need Skilled Replacement…. First generation of Conventional UT is based on A-Scan presentation only which indeed very difficult to interpret a discontinuities. Conventional UT has its own merits & Demerits. For an example Where Conv.UT has a low risk of health hazard, High Probability of detection for Highly Severe defects like Through thick Cracks, Lack of Fusion & Many Planar defects, but all those defects can only be detected if operator properly select his UT Equipment & its calibration. Wrong calibration or poor Probe selection may lead to missed call. Which is the reason why you need a highly skilled & experienced UT Inspectors. More importantly that lack of technology for storing a permanent record in Conv.UT Is always a risky choice. Conv.UT Alternative…. Although it is on the decline, many NDT analysts still use radiography for inspections. However, phased array ultrasound testing (PAUT) is rapidly replacing radiography, Conv.UT and other less effective NDT methods as the new standard emerges and for good reason also. When Phased Array and Time of Flight Diffraction techniques are performed correctly, the quality of performance is superior when compared with radiography. This means that the confidence level of the structural integrity of products inspected with TOFD or PA is higher than those inspected using radiography. Because phased array & TOFD inspections are entirely digital, inspection results are instantaneous, providing immediate feedback to enable faster inspections, Permanent storage, confirmation of weld quality or detailed identification of defects & Without affecting its surroundings. Costly Alternative…. The inspection costs of PA and/or TOFD are typically higher than the costs of conventional RT, however, because dangerous radiation is not a factor when using the advanced techniques, there can be huge savings associated preventing the disruption of works within the area. In addition, the speed of PA and TOFD shortens overall inspection time and also eliminates the lost time associated with RT. An inherent factor of using a more accurate inspection technique is the higher repair rate due to the more stringent acceptance criteria of PA and TOFD. Increased confidence in the integrity of the product offsets the relatively small rise of repairs thereby decreasing any significant influence total costs. Reliable Alternative…. Unlike radiography, phased array inspection techniques don’t involve hazardous materials or supplies, require additional licensing or certification, or generate waste. Phased array inspections can be conducted safely while other work is being done in close proximity. PAUT instruments can easily generate detailed standardized inspection reports that can be printed or saved as digital records to meet compliance requirements. Additional advantages of phased array inspections techniques include: High probability of detection (POD) for planar flaws such as fatigue and stress corrosion cracks. Ability to assess through-wall depth attributes to accurately determine the location defects. Calculation of defect height measurements as an indicator of flaw severity. Ability to discriminate among defects stacked throughout the material thickness in a proximate circumferential location. Conclusion…. 120% 100% 80% 60% Probability of Detection 40% False Call Rate Reliability 20% 0% PAUT TOFD Conv.UT X-ray & Gamma ray
Various codes have accepted PAUT and TOFD as volumetric examination
technique. Higher POD, lower FCR, higher accuracy in sizing and discontinuity characterization, digital records, less dependency on operator, less regulatory requirements attract the industry to think PAUT and TOFD to replace conventional volumetric NDE methods. Continuous advancements in technology is driving Oil & Gas / power industry to use higher efficient operating systems which led to selection and manufacturing new and advanced materials.
These advanced materials are very critical in nature. Such
advancements in designs and materials deserves advancements in discontinuity detection. Thank You