Wireless Channel Modeling and Performance Analysis Based On Markov Chain
Wireless Channel Modeling and Performance Analysis Based On Markov Chain
Abstract: High altitude platform station (HAPS) is a new means of wireless communication,which operate in stratosphere
whose altitude is about 20km.The wirless communication network of HAPS are researched Markov chain model is proposed in
the HAPS wireless channel model.The performance of the wireless communication channel and channel model are analyzed.The
simulation results shows that the performance of coded HAPS wireless channel is better than the uncoded channel.The signal
level is different when the radio spacing distance is different.
Key Words: Wireless Communication,Markov Chain,Channel Model,High Altitude Platform Station
978-1-5090-4657-7/17/$31.00 2017
c IEEE 2256
routing, and traffic management HAPS communication node. 3.CHANNEL MODELING
It can be implemented with a laser or microwave The model of channel tap delay in HAPS wireless
communication between them.It is a challenging problem communication network can be expressed as:
about the link between HAPS[29-30].
N
h(t ,τ ) = c0 ⋅ δ (t − t0 ) + ¦ cn (t )δ (t − τ n ) (1)
n =1
space-based network
Where, c0 is the part of LOS(Line of Sight), cn (t ) shows the
HAPS HAPS
HAPS
HAPS
variable coefficient,which follow the Gaussian distribution. τ n
HAPS is the delay time of n tap.
HAPS HAPS HAPS network
HAPS
The envelope of the signal is plural,which can be shown in:
S (t )e jθ ( t ) = u (t )e jα ( t ) + v (t )e j β ( t )
HAPS
HAPS HAPS
(2)
ground-based network In the above formula, u (t ) is a random variables which obey
Rayleigh distribution. α (t ) obey (0, 2π ) Uniform distribution.
Fig 1. HAPS wireless communication network
v (t ) and β (t ) are the deterministic signals.
The geometric relationships of a communications system of The PDF(Probability Density Function) of S (t ) be expressed
HAPS is shown in Figure 2. as[33-36]:
s2 + v2
s (− ) sv
HAPS f ( s) = e 2σ 2
I0 ( )
σ 2
σ2 (3)
In the above formula, s > 0 , I0 is the Besell function. The
d
h root mean square can be calculated by using this formula:
E[ s 2 ] = v 2 + 2σ 2 (4)
User ε v
Where, is the signal envelope which can receive the direct
r
signal. 2σ 2 is the average power of the HAPS space path.The
Fig 2. The geometric relationships of a communications system properties of the Rice distribution is related to the k factor.
v2
Within the scope of the near-earth space using stable k=
communications platform as a microwave relay station.With 2σ 2 (5)
the ground control equipment,entrance equipment and a k is the average power.Besell function can be approximated
variety of wireless communication system in the composition by:
of the user.High altitude platform can comprehensive network
ex
and satellite ground, also can separate and ground network,as I0 ( x) = ,x →∞
can be seen in Figure 3.The communication platform to keep 2π x (6)
in sync with the earth's rotation,can reside the air for a long
time. High altitude platform communication of good waves Then, f ( s ) can be expressed as:
transmission characteristics[31-36].Through the platform to (−
( s − v )2
s )
realize the ground between the user, platform or platform and f (s) = e 2σ 2
Scatterers
•
If the random process is discrete Markov chain, the variable is
•
•
• r
a collection of finite state. Si denotes the channel condition on
•
• HAPS
• •
the n discontinuous points. The first-order Markov chain is
• • • composed of a series of discrete state random process. For a
n moment state, its probability only depends on the state of
L
the n-1 moment state.It can be expressed as:
P( X n = j / ( X 1 = i1 ,..., X n −1 = in −1 ) = P( X n = j / ( X n −1 = in −1 ) (8)
U1 U2
θ
Where, i1 < i2 < in −1 < j , X n denotes n moments of random
Δl
variable X which value is j ,belong to the state E j
-5
10
-25
10
¦ ʌ =1
i
i (11)
-30
10
ʌe = I (12) -35
Channel transform model
Bad channel
10
In the above formula, I is a unit matrix. e is on behalf of Good channel
-40
§ PAA PAB
PAC · The three-state HAPS channel model system performance is
¨ ¸ shown in Figure 6. The performance of HAPS A state channel
P = ¨ PBA
PBB PBC ¸ (13)
¨P is better than B channel. Similarly, The performance of HAPS
PCB PCC ¸¹
© CA B state channel is better than C channel.
The above formula can be represented by using graphical 0
10
method. A state
PAB -1 B state
10
C state
PAA
-2
PBA 10
A B PBB
-4
PCA 10
C PBC
-5
10
PCC
-6
10
Fig 4. Three state Markov chain
-7
10
In the HAPS wireless communication system.We suppose 0 1 2 3 4 5
E b/No(dB)
6 7 8 9
0
as:
lg(κ )
-0.05
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
l = 1+ 2 s
-20
REFERENCES
Relative received signal level (dB)
-25
[1] J.Choi,J.L.David,T.P.Bidigare,Coded distributed diversity:A novel
distributed reception technique for wireless communication
-30 systems,IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, Vol.63, No.5, 1310-
1321,2015.
-35
[2] J.Acuna,I.Cuinas, Average spectral efficiency of multi-modulation cellular
systems, IET Communications ,Vol.7, No.2, 146 - 151,2013.
-40
[3] X.Y.Liu,C.Liu,W.P.Liu,Wind Shear Target Echo Modeling and
Simulation,Discrete Dynamic in Nature and Society, Vol.2015,No.4, 1-
-45
0 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1 0.12 0.14 0.16 6,2015.
Time (s)
[4] W.Q.Wang,D.Jiang, Integrated wireless sensor systems via near-space and
satellite platforms:A review,IEEE Sensors Journal, Vol.14,No.11, 3903-
(a) Spacing 1/9 λ
3914,2014.
[5] R.R.Zhang,L. Dong,C.Y.Sun, Adaptive nonsingular terminal sliding mode
-15
control design for near space hypersonic vehicles, IEEE/CAA Journal of
Automatica Sinica,Vol.1,No.2, 155-161,2014.
-20
[6] G.Q.Chen,B.Y.Chen,P.F. Li, P.Bai, C.Q.Ji,Study of aerodynamic
Relative received signal level (dB)
-25 configuration design and wind tunnel test for solar powered buoyancy-
lifting vehicle in the near-space,Procedia Engineering,Vol.99, 67-
-30 72,2015.
[7] G.H.Wang,S.F. Zhang,K.S.Wu,TiM:fine-grained rate adaptation in
-35 wLANs,IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing,Vol.15,No.3, 748-
761,2015.
-40
[8]J.Hu,L.L.Yang,L.Hanzo,Distributed Multistage cooperative-social-
multicast-aided content dissemination in random mobile networks, IEEE
-45
0 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1 0.12 0.14 Transactions on Vehicular Technology, Vol.64, No.7, 3075 - 3089,
Time (s)
2015.
(b) Spacing λ [9]N.Tekbiyik,T.Girici,E.U.Biyikoglu,K.Leblebicioglu,Proportional fair
resource allocation on an energy harvesting downlink, IEEE
Fig 8. Relative received signal level under different spacing λ Transactions on Wireless Communications, Vol.12, No.4,1699-
1711,2013.
0
10 [10]J.Fink,A.Ribeiro,V.Kumar, Robust control of mobility and
communications in autonomous robot teams,IEEE Access,Vol.1, 290 -
P r o b a b ilit y t h e a b s c is s a is n o t e x c e e d e d
309, 2013.
-1
[11] J.Y.Su, Near space as a sui generis zone:A tri-layer approach of
10 delimitation, Space Policy,Vol.29,No.2, 90-92,2013.
[12] B.Jiang,D.Z.Xu,P.Shi,C.C.Lim,Adaptive neural observer-based back
stepping fault tolerant control for near space vehicle under control effect
-2
10
or damage,IET Control Theory & Applications,Vol.8,No.9,658-
666,2014.
λ/9 separation
[13] N.Baccour,A.Koubaa,H.Youssef,M.Alves,Reliable link quality
λ separation
estimation in low-power wireless networks and its impact on tree-
-3
10 routing, Ad Hoc Networks, Vol.27, 1-25,2015.
-45 -40 -35 -30 -25 -20 -15
Relative received signal level (dB) [14]M.Zhang, D.J.Atkinson,B.Ji, M. Armstrong,M.Y.Ma, A near-state Three-
dimensional space vector modulation for a three-phase four-leg voltage
Fig 9. Signal level(dB) source inverter,IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, Vol.29,No.11,
5715-5726,2014.
As can be seen from Figure 9,the signal level is different
[15] J. J.Galvez, P.M.Ruiz,Joint link rate allocation, routing and channel
when the spacing distance is different. The smaller the assignment in multi-rate multi-channel wireless networks, Ad Hoc
interval,the better of the signal level. Networks, Vol.29, 78-98,2015.
[16] A.Rajandekar,B,Sikdar, A survey of MAC layer issues and protocols for
6.SUMMARY machine-to-machine communications,IEEE Internet of Things
Journal,Vol.2, No.2, 175 - 186, 2015.
Through the analysis of the wireless communication network [17] Rodolfo Feick,Mauricio Rodríguez,Luciano Ahumada,et al, Achievable
channel model of HAPS,some conclusions can be got.First of gains of directional antennas in outdoor-indoor propagation
all, the Markov chain is effective.The relative received signal environments, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications,Vol.14,
No.3, 1447-1456,2015.
level is related to the spacing distance. Second, the more state
[18]G.Min,G.Qing,G.Xuemai,Performace evaluation of coverage and wireless
of the Markov chain,the better of the HAPS channel link characterstic for HAPS communication, Chinese Journal of radio
performance.The next step in our research is to focus science,Vol.27,No.4, 832-839, 2012.
on the performance and characteristics of HAPS wireless