US Vs Ching - Case Digest
US Vs Ching - Case Digest
Ah Sing
Issue: Has the crime of illegal importation of opium into the Philippine Islands been
proven?
Ruling: Yes. Section 4 of Act No. 2381 states that any person who shall unlawfully
import or bring any prohibited drug into the Philippine Islands. "Import" and "bring" are
synonymous terms. The mere act of going into a port, without breaking bulk, is prima
facie evidence of importation. The importation is not the making entry of goods at the
custom house, but merely the bringing them into port; and the importation is complete
before entry of the Custom House. As applied to the Opium Law, we expressly hold
that any person unlawfully imports or brings any prohibited drug into the Philippine
Islands, when the prohibited drug is found under this person's control on a vessel which
has come direct from a foreign country and is within the jurisdictional limits of the
Philippine Islands. In such case, a person is guilty of illegal importation of the drug
unless contrary circumstances exist or the defense proves otherwise. Applied to the
facts herein, it would be absurb to think that the accused was merely carrying opium
back and forth between Saigon and Cebu for the mere pleasure of so doing. It would
likewise be impossible to conceive that the accused needed so large an amount of
opium for his personal use. No better explanation being possible, the logical deduction
is that the defendant intended this opium to be brought into the Philippine Islands. We
accordingly find that there was illegal importation of opium from a foreign country into
the Philippine Islands. To anticipate any possible misunderstanding, let it be said that
these statements do not relate to foreign vessels in transit, a situation not present.