Air-Launch-To-Orbit: Jump To Navigation Jump To Search
Air-Launch-To-Orbit: Jump To Navigation Jump To Search
Contents
1Advantages
2Criticisms
4See also
5References
6External links
Advantages[edit]
The principal advantage of a rocket being launched by a high flying airplane is that it
need not fly through the low, dense atmosphere, the drag of which requires a
considerable[1] amount of extra work and thus mass of propellant. Higher densities at
lower altitudes result in larger drag forces acting on the vehicle. In addition, thrust is lost
due to over-expansion of the exhaust at high ambient pressure and under-expansion at
low ambient pressure; a fixed nozzle geometry cannot provide optimal exhaust
expansion over the full range of ambient pressure, and represents a compromise
solution. Rockets launched from high altitude can be optimized for lower ambient
pressure, thus achieving greater thrust over the entire operating regime.
Propellant is conserved because the air-breathing carrier aircraft lifts the rocket to
altitude much more efficiently. Airplane engines do not require on-board storage of
an oxidizer and they can use the surrounding air to produce thrust, for example with
a turbofan. This allows the launch system to conserve a significant amount of mass that
would otherwise be reserved for fuel, reducing the overall size. A larger fraction of the
rocket mass can then include payload, reducing payload launch costs. It is also possible
to make use of higher-impulse fuels precluded from surface launches due to their
toxicity, such as those containing beryllium or fluorine.
Air launch to orbit offers the potential for aircraft-like operations such as launch on
demand, and is also less subject to launch-constraining weather. This allows the aircraft
to fly around weather conditions as well as fly to better launch points, and to launch a
payload into any orbital inclination at any time. Insurance costs are reduced as well,
because launches occur well away from land, and there is no need for a launch pad or
blockhouse.[citation needed]
Air launch to orbit also works well as part of a combination launch system such as a
reusable air-launched single stage to skyhook launch vehicle powered by a rocket or
rocket/ramjet/scramjet engine.
An additional benefit of air launch to orbit is a reduced delta V needed to achieve orbit.
This results in a greater payload to fuel ratio which reduces the cost per unit mass to
orbit. To further leverage the Delta V advantage, supersonic air launch to orbit has been
proposed.[2]
Criticisms[edit]
According to Aviation Week and Space Technology, air launch to orbit is limited by
aircraft size. Additionally, airplanes may generate large lateral forces which could
damage payloads.[3]
SpaceX CEO Elon Musk argued in a Q&A session that the increase in performance is
not worth the additional complexity and limitations (paragraphs added):
"…it seems like...you're high up there and so surely that's good and you're going at...0.7
or 0.8 Mach and you've got some speed and altitude, you can use a higher expansion
ratio on the nozzle, doesn't all that add up to a meaningful improvement in payload to
orbit?
"The answer is no, it does not, unfortunately. It's quite a small improvement. It's maybe
a 5% improvement in payload to orbit...and then you've got this humungous plane to
deal with. Which is just like having a stage. From SpaceX's standpoint, would it make
more sense to have a gigantic plane or to increase the size of the first stage by five
percent? Uhh, I'll take option two.
"And then, once you get beyond a certain scale, you just can't make the plane big
enough. When you drop...the rocket, you have the slight problem that you're not going
the right direction. If you look at what Orbital Sciences did with Pegasus, they have
a delta wing to do the turn maneuver but then you've got this big wing that's added a
bunch of mass and you've able to mostly, but not entirely, convert your horizontal
velocity into vertical velocity, or mostly vertical velocity, and the net is really not great." [4]
NOTS-EV-1 Pilot
Under development:
DARPA ALASA
AirLaunch LLC
MAKS
Ishim[11]
Svityaz [uk][11]
Orbital Sciences Pegasus II – contracted design/build for Stratolaunch Systems[12]
Swiss Space Systems SOAR
XCOR Aerospace Lynx Mark III
Falcon 9 Air Developed 2011-2012, In partnership
between SpaceX and Stratolaunch systems
See also[edit]
NOTS-EV-1 Pilot
NOTS-EV-2 Caleb
Buoyant space port
Rockoon
Launch vehicle types by launch platform
References[edit]
1. ^ "Flight Mechanics of Manned Sub-Orbital Reusable Launch Vehicles with
Recommendations for Launch and Recovery".
2. ^ "Conceptual Design of a Supersonic Air-launch System" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the
original on 2015-02-10. Retrieved 2014-12-03.
3. ^ Norris, Guy (15 February 2015). "Design Space". Aviation Week and Space
Technology(Volume 177 Number 2).
4. ^ "Transcript - Elon Musk lecture at the Royal Aeronautical Society". Shit Elon Says. Archived
from the original on 11 March 2016. Retrieved 11 March 2016.
5. ^ "Technologies". Archived from the original on 2015-12-08. Retrieved 2015-12-01.
6. ^ ARCA Space, Haas Orbital Rocket Launcher Archived 2012-07-22 at the Wayback
Machine fact sheet, Dec. 2, 2008 (accessed 22 Sept 2014)
7. ^ Leone, Dan (November 26, 2013). "Startup Generation Orbit Launch Service Bets Big on
'Small Space'".
8. ^ Diller, George (September 30, 2013). "NASA Awards First CubeSat-Class Launch Services
Contract". Archived from the original on September 30, 2013.
9. ^ Borys, Christian (7 May 2017). "The world's biggest plane may have a new mission".
BBC. Archived from the original on 20 October 2017. Retrieved 20 October 2017.
10. ^ Gebhardt, Chris (2014-11-26). "SNC, Stratolaunch expand on proposed Dream Chaser
flights". NASASpaceFlight.com. Archived from the original on 2014-11-28. Retrieved 2014-
11-27.
11. ^ Jump up to:a b Russia, Kazakhstan to develop unique space system Archived 2013-02-09 at
the Wayback Machine: "Ukrainian experts moved to develop the Svityaz system based on
the An-225 Mriya (Dream) Cossack jumbo transport plane and the Zenit-2 rocket", "The Ishim
complex will include two MiG-31I aircraft, a three-stage launch vehicle on a streamlined store
between engine nacelles, as well as an Ilyushin Il-76MD Midas surveillance plane."
12. ^ Bergin, Chris (2013-05-25). "Stratolaunch and Orbital – The Height of Air
Launch". NASASpaceFlight.com. Archived from the original on 2013-06-08. Retrieved 2013-
05-24.
External links[edit]
Media related to Air launch to orbit at Wikimedia Commons
A Study of Air Launch Methods for RLVs (AIAA 2001-4619)
Low Cost Launch of Payloads to Low Earth Orbit
Illini Space Jet
Categories:
Air launch to orbit
Rocketry
Space access
Navigation menu
Not logged in
Talk
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Article
Talk
Read
Edit
View history
Search
Search Go
Main page
Contents
Current events
Random article
About Wikipedia
Contact us
Donate
Contribute
Help
Learn to edit
Community portal
Recent changes
Upload file
Tools
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Permanent link
Page information
Cite this page
Wikidata item
Print/export
Download as PDF
Printable version
In other projects
Wikimedia Commons
Languages
العربية
Français
Bahasa Indonesia
日本語
Português
Simple English
中文
Edit links
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Contact Wikipedia
Mobile view
Developers
Statistics
Cookie statement
Launch vehicle
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
"Satellite launch vehicle" redirects here. For the Indian rocket, see Satellite Launch
Vehicle.
This article needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve
this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may
be challenged and removed.
Find sources: "Launch vehicle" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (August
2009) (Learn how and when to remove this template message)
Russian Soyuz TMA-5 lifts off from the Baikonur Cosmodrome in Kazakhstan heading for the International
Space Station
Contents
1Mass to orbit
2General information
o 2.1Launch platform locations
o 2.2Flight regimes
o 2.3Distributed launch
3See also
4References
5External links
Mass to orbit[edit]
Launch vehicles are classed by NASA according to low Earth orbit payload capability:[2]
General information[edit]
Orbital spaceflight requires a satellite or spacecraft payload to be accelerated to very
high velocity. In the vacuum of space, reaction forces must be provided by the ejection
of mass, resulting in the rocket equation. The physics of spaceflight are such that rocket
stages are typically required to achieve the desired orbit.
Expendable launch vehicles are designed for one-time use, with boosters that usually
separate from their payload and disintegrate during atmospheric reentry or on contact
with the ground. In contrast, reusable launch vehicle boosters are designed to be
recovered intact and launched again. The Falcon 9 is an example reusable launch
vehicle.[7]
For example, the European Space Agency is responsible for the Ariane V, and
the United Launch Alliance manufactures and launches the Delta IV and Atlas
V rockets.
Launch platform locations[edit]
Launchpads can be located on land (spaceport), on a fixed ocean platform (San Marco),
on a mobile ocean platform (Sea Launch), and on a submarine. Launch vehicles can
also be launched from the air.
Flight regimes[edit]
See also: Sub-orbital spaceflight, Orbital spaceflight, Trans-lunar injection,
and Interplanetary spaceflight
A launch vehicle will start off with its payload at some location on the surface of the
Earth. To reach orbit, the vehicle must travel vertically to leave the atmosphere and
horizontally to prevent re-contacting the ground. The required velocity varies depending
on the orbit but will always be extreme when compared to velocities encountered in
normal life.
Launch vehicles provide varying degrees of performance. For example, a satellite
bound for Geostationary orbit (GEO) can either be directly inserted by the upper
stage of the launch vehicle or launched to a geostationary transfer orbit (GTO). A direct
insertion places greater demands on the launch vehicle, while GTO is more demanding
of the spacecraft. Once in orbit, launch vehicle upper stages and satellites can have
overlapping capabilities, although upper stages tend to have orbital lifetimes measured
in hours or days while spacecraft can last decades.
Distributed launch[edit]
Distributed launch involves the accomplishment of a goal with multiple spacecraft
launches. A large spacecraft such as the International Space Station can be
constructed by assembling modules in orbit, or in-space propellant transfer conducted
to greatly increase the delta-V capabilities of a cislunar or deep space vehicle.
Distributed launch enables space missions that are not possible with single launch
architectures.[8]
Mission architectures for distributed launch were explored in the 2000s [9] and launch
vehicles with integrated distributed launch capability built in began development in 2017
with the Starship design. The standard Starship launch architecture is to refuel the
spacecraft in low Earth orbit to enable the craft to send high-mass payloads on much
more energetic missions.[10]
See also[edit]
Spaceflight portal
External links[edit]
Wikidata has the property:
space launch
vehicle
(P375) (see uses)
show
Spaceflight
Categories:
Space launch vehicles
Spaceflight
Navigation menu
Not logged in
Talk
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Article
Talk
Read
Edit
View history
Search
Search Go
Main page
Contents
Current events
Random article
About Wikipedia
Contact us
Donate
Contribute
Help
Learn to edit
Community portal
Recent changes
Upload file
Tools
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Permanent link
Page information
Cite this page
Wikidata item
Print/export
Download as PDF
Printable version
In other projects
Wikimedia Commons
Languages
العربية
বাংলা
Deutsch
Español
Français
Bahasa Indonesia
Português
Русский
中文
43 more
Edit links
This page was last edited on 1 February 2021, at 14:32 (UTC).
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using
this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia
Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization.
Privacy policy
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Contact Wikipedia
Mobile view
Developers
Statistics
Cookie statement