Scribd
Upload
91 views2 pages

Ipcrf Summary - Sir Ben

This mid-year review form summarizes the performance of Teacher I Ben Joseph C. Capistrano for the 2020-2021 school year at Pili National High School in Camarines Sur, Philippines. The form rates Mr. Capistrano's performance on 4 key result areas and 13 objectives using a quantitative scale of 1 to 5. Overall, Mr. Capistrano received a numerical rating of 3.8125 and an adjectival rating of "Very Satisfactory" for his accomplishments of the key result areas and objectives. The form was completed by his rater, Master Teacher I Bernardita M. Lagumbay.

Uploaded by

Ben Joseph Capistrano
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
91 views2 pages

Ipcrf Summary - Sir Ben

This mid-year review form summarizes the performance of Teacher I Ben Joseph C. Capistrano for the 2020-2021 school year at Pili National High School in Camarines Sur, Philippines. The form rates Mr. Capistrano's performance on 4 key result areas and 13 objectives using a quantitative scale of 1 to 5. Overall, Mr. Capistrano received a numerical rating of 3.8125 and an adjectival rating of "Very Satisfactory" for his accomplishments of the key result areas and objectives. The form was completed by his rater, Master Teacher I Bernardita M. Lagumbay.

Uploaded by

Ben Joseph Capistrano
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

MID-YEAR REVIEW FORM (MRF)

Teacher I-III, SPET I-IV, Special Science Teacher I-II, (Proficient Teacher)

Name of Employee: BEN JOSEPH C. CAPISTRANO Name of Rater: BERNARDITA M. LAGUMBAY

Position: Teacher I Position: Master Teacher I


Bureau/Center/Division: Pili National High School-Camarines Sur Date of Review:
Rating Period: SY 2020-2021

PART III. SUMMARY OF RATINGS PER DISCUSSION


Weight per Adjectival
WEIGHT PER Numerical Rating
KRAS OBJECTIVES Objectives Score Rating
KRA
Q E T Ave
Objective 1 7.50% 3 4 3.500 0.263 Very Satisfactory
KRA 1: 22.50% Objective 2 7.50% 3 4 3.500 0.263 Very Satisfactory
Objective 3 7.50% 3 4 3.500 0.263 Very Satisfactory
Objective 4 7.50% 3 4 3.500 0.263 Very Satisfactory
KRA 2: 22.50% Objective 5 7.50% 3 4 3.500 0.263 Very Satisfactory
Objective 6 7.50% 3 4 3.500 0.263 Very Satisfactory
Objective 7 7.50% 4 4 4.000 0.300 Very Satisfactory
KRA 3 22.50% Objective 8 7.50% 4 5 4.500 0.338 Outstanding
Objective 9 7.50% 4 4 4.000 0.300 Very Satisfactory
Objective 10 7.50% 4 4 4.000 0.300 Very Satisfactory
KRA 4: 22.50% Objective 11 7.50% 4 4 4 4.000 0.300 Very Satisfactory
Objective 12 7.50% 4 4 4 4.000 0.300 Very Satisfactory
Plus
10% Objective 13 10% 4 4 4.000 0.400 Very Satisfactory
Factor
Final Rating
FINAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS Accomplishments of KRAS and Objectives 3.8125
Adjectival Rating

BEN JOSEPH C. CAPISTRANO BERNARDITA M. LAGUMBAY ERMA D. ESCURO, Ph.D SALVACION E. LARGO, Ed.D
Ratee Rater
Rater Approving
Approving Authority
Authority Validator
Validator

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy