BMD SM Detailedoutlinewithsessionplan
BMD SM Detailedoutlinewithsessionplan
Course objectives
• Orient the students towards a methodical analysis of strategic issues under conditions of incomplete and
imperfect information.
• A student should be able to understand what allows certain organizations to make a profit while other
organizations fail to do so.
• Why certain organizations can sustain their economic profits over long periods of time in comparison to
other organizations
Textbook for the course: Strategic Management by Frank T. Rothaermel, 3rd Edition, McGraw Hill
Education. (References to chapters in the course outline, refer to this textbook)
Evaluation
End term- 30% Case based- Case will be shared on the 19 th session
Assignment – 20%- 18 groups of 4/3 members each- each group can focus on any one topic discussed in
any of the sessions. For the selected topic, the groups can analyse any firm/s using data available from
your previous experience or from websites/secondary information. The output required is a report of
about five to six pages- 1.5 spacing of 12 size font with one inch margin on all sides. Whatever you
gather from other sources (i.e not in your own words) can be added in separate appendix.
Quizzes and in class submissions/presentation- Of this, 10% would be a quiz towards the end of the
course on case discussions. The remaining 10% would be based on the group presentations in the class
and on my perceptions of your class participation. The topics for these group presentations is given
below.
Session wise readings and cases
1. Concept of strategy
a. Reading: Chapter 1
b. Reading: Hambrick, D.C. & Fredrickson, J.W. (2005), Are you sure you have a strategy?
c. Case (from chapter in book) Does twitter have a strategy? (page 6, 23)
2. The process of strategy
a. Reading: Chapter 2
b. Mini Case: How the strategy process kills innovation at Microsoft (pages 435 to 436)
c. Mini Case: Michael Phelps (pages 428 to 429)
d. Mini Case: Strategy and serendipity: a billion-dollar business (pages 438 to 439)
3. Industry analysis
a. Reading: Porter, M.E. (2008), The five competitive forces that shape strategy, HBR
b. Reading: Chapter 3: pages 72 to 90.
c. Case: Volvo Trucks A, Volvo Trucks B
4. General environment
a. Chapter 3: pages 66 to 72
b. Mini Case: Tesla Motors- pages 65, 93
5. Competitive environment
a. Reading: Brandenburger, A.M., & Nalebuff, B.J. (1995), The right game: Use game
theory to shape strategy, HBR
b. Reading: Chapter 3: Pages 91 to 94
c. Mini Case: Flipkart is fulfilling its wish and beating Amazon.com (page 494-496)
6. Internal environment analysis, value chain
a. Reading: Collis, D.J. Montgomery, C.A. (2008), Competing on resources, HBR
b. Mini Case: Starbucks: Schultz serves up a turnaround.
c. Mini Case: Apple: what’s next? (Page 440- 442)
7. Competencies, core competencies
a. Reading: Chapter 4
b. Mini case: Mini case: Strategy and serendipity: a billion-dollar business (Page 438-439)
c. Mini case: Nike’s core competency: The risky business of fairy tales
8. Generic strategies- differentiation
a. Reading: Ghemawat, P., & Rivkin, J.W. (2006), Creating competitive advantage
b. Reading: Chapter 6, Pages 174 to 182, 191-192
c. Case: When will P&G play to win again? (pages 449-450)
9. Generic strategies- cost leadership
a. Porter, M.E. (1996), What is strategy? HBR
b. Reading: Chapter 6 Pages 183-190, 193
c. Case: Quick Medx
10. Generic strategies – integrated cost leadership
a. Case: Calvetta
b. Reading: Chapter 6: pages 194 to 201
c. Mini Case: Trimming fat at whole foods market (page 452)
d. Mini Case: Cirque du Soleil- searching for a new blue ocean- pages 462-464
11. Corporate growth
a. Reading: Porter, M. E. (1987). From competitive advantage to corporate strategy
b. Reading: Chapter 8: pages 252-256
c. Case: Options for growth: The case of Haier (A)
d. Case: Options for growth: The case of Haier (B)
12. Growth through innovation
a. Reading: Chapter 7
b. Mini Case: Competing on Business Models: Google vs Microsoft (page 465 to 468)
13. Vertical integration
a. Reading: Osegowitsch, T., & Madhok, A. (2003). Vertical integration is dead, or is it?
b. Reading: Chapter 8: pages 257 to 271
c. Case: De Beers group: exploring the diamond reselling opportunity
14. Diversification
a. Reading: Collis, D. J. & Montgomery, C. A., (1998), Creating Corporate Advantage.
b. Reading: Chapter 8: pages 271-2882
c. Reading: Campbell et al. (1995). Corporate strategy: The quest for parenting advantage
d. Case: Alphabet eyes new frontiers
15. Mergers and acquisitions
a. Reading: Christensen, C. M., Alton, R., Rising, C., & Waldeck, A. (2011). The big idea:
The new M&A playbook. Harvard Business Review, 89(3), 48-57.
b. Reading: Chatper 9: pages 309 to 316
c. Case: Group PSA: Acquisition of Opel/vauxall from Turnaround to profitable growth
d. Case: Fnac Darty Merger: from bidding wars to Entity Integration
16. JVs and alliances
a. Reading: Dyer, J. H., Kale, P., & Singh, H., (2004), When to Ally and When to Acquire
b. Chapter 9- pages 279 to 306
c. Case: Eli Lily in India: rethinking the joint venture strategy
17. Internationalization
a. Reading: Porter, M. E. (1990). Competitive Advantage of Nations. Harvard Business Review.
b. Reading: Ibarra, H. (1996). National cultures and work-related values: The Hofstede study.
c. Reading: Chapter 10
d. Case: Globalization of Cemex
18. Strategy in emerging market context
a. Reading: Khanna, T. & Palepu, K. G., (2006), Emerging Giants: Building World-Class
Companies in Developing Countries, Harvard Business Review, 84(10): 60-69.
b. Ramachandran, et al (2013), Why Conglomerates Thrive (Outside US)
c. Case: Leading the Tata group A- the Ratan Tata years
19. Structure, culture, processes
a. Reading: Chapter 11.
b. Case: FBI
20. Evaluation of strategy and firm performance
a. Reading: Kaplan, R.S. & Norton, D.P. (1996) Linking the Balanced Scorecard to Strategy
b. Reading: Chapter 4
c. Case: TWA parts (abridged)