Scribd
Upload
27 views2 pages

DWDD

The document discusses consequences of agreements obtained through undue influence and coercion. It discusses that such contracts are voidable and courts have powers to set aside such contracts either absolutely or with conditions. It also discusses that the party seeking rescission must do equity if they received benefits under the contract.

Uploaded by

Mujassim
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
27 views2 pages

DWDD

The document discusses consequences of agreements obtained through undue influence and coercion. It discusses that such contracts are voidable and courts have powers to set aside such contracts either absolutely or with conditions. It also discusses that the party seeking rescission must do equity if they received benefits under the contract.

Uploaded by

Mujassim
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

• Section 19 A deals with consequences of agreement obtained by undue influence.

• sThe court in such cases has been empowered to set aside the contract either absolutely or
upon such terms and conditions as the Court may deem just.

• A party who seeks rescission of the contract must also do equity and, if he has received any
benefit under the contract.

• case has been obtained by coercion.

• Case: Ranganayakamma v. alwar sethi

• have already received some benefit under contract. The court in such cases has been
empowered to set aside the contract either absolutely or upon such terms and conditions as the
Court may deem just.

• A party who seeks rescission of the contract must also do equity and, if he has received any
benefit under the contract.

• Section 19 A deals with consequences of agreement obtained by undue influence.

• Voidable at the option of party whose consent was so caused.

• Because of undue influence one party to the contract may have taken an undue advantage
under the contract, or the party entitled to avoid the contract may have already received some
benefit under contract. The court in such cases has been empowered to set aside the contract
either absolutely or upon such terms and conditions as the Court may deem just.

• A party who seeks rescission of the contract must also do equity and, if he has received any
benefit under the contract.

• case has been obtained by coercion.

• Case: Ranganayakamma v. alwar sethi

• have already received some benefit under contract. The court in such cases has been
empowered to set aside the contract either absolutely or upon such terms and conditions as the
Court may deem just.

• A party who seeks rescission of the contract must also do equity and, if he has received any
benefit under the contract.
• Section 19 A deals with consequences of agreement obtained by undue influence.

• Voidable at the option of party whose consent was so caused.

• Because of undue influence one party to the contract may have taken an undue advantage
under the contract, or the party entitled to avoid the contract may have already received some
benefit under contract. The court in such cases has been empowered to set aside the contract
either absolutely or upon such terms and conditions as the Court may deem just.

• A party who seeks rescission of the contract must also do equity and, if he has received any
benefit under the contract.

• case has been obtained by coercion.

• Case: Ranganayakamma v. alwar sethi

• have already received some benefit under contract. The court in such cases has been
empowered to set aside the contract either absolutely or upon such terms and conditions as the
Court may deem just.

• A party who seeks rescission of the contract must also do equity and, if he has received any
benefit under the contract.

• Section 19 A deals with consequences of agreement obtained by undue influence.

• Voidable at the option of party whose consent was so caused.

• Because of undue influence one party to the contract may have taken an undue advantage
under the contract, or the party entitled to avoid the contract may have already received some
benefit under contract. The court in such cases has been empowered to set aside the contract
either absolutely or upon such terms and conditions as the Court may deem just.

• A party who seeks rescission of the contract must also do equity and, if he has received any
benefit under the contract.

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy