Policy Brief Impact AI OSH 0
Policy Brief Impact AI OSH 0
However, cobots’ increased mobility and decision-making autonomy, based on self-learning algorithms, could make their
actions less predictable for the workers collaborating with them. This may result in an increased risk of accidents through
collision or arising from the equipment used by cobots. Over-reliance on technology could also lead to deskilling and safety
risks. As cobots are connected to the internet of things, there are cybersecurity issues and associated risks of functional safety.
Workers having to keep up with a cobot’s pace and level of work may be put under pressure to achieve the same level of
productivity. Increased working with robots may also significantly reduce contact with human peers and social support. This
may have negative impacts on workers’ safety and health, particularly their mental health.
With the increasing use of AI, automated systems are now able to carry out not only physical tasks but also a variety of
cognitive tasks, such as driving autonomously or assisting with, for example, legal casework or medical diagnoses. The use
of AI-based systems is, therefore, anticipated in many different sectors and settings, from manufacturing and agriculture to the
care sector, hospitality, and transport and services, including customer-facing jobs. As the content of these jobs and the tasks
to be performed will change, new challenges for OSH may arise.
For example, automation of tasks can be associated with more sedentary work and with less variation of tasks, with workers
being left with repetitive work. Automation of tasks can result in cognitive underload and boredom, in performance pressure
and intensification of work and certain risk factors, such as isolation and lack of interaction with peers, and can have a negative
impact on teamwork, all of which are known psychosocial risks.
Data can be collected about workers through mobile devices, wearable or embedded monitoring devices (in clothes, PPE, or
even on the body). They include keyboard clicks, the content of emails, websites visited, number and content of telephone
calls, information from social media, locations through GPS tracking, body movements, vital signs, indicators of stress and
fatigue, micro-facial expressions, tone of voice and sentiment analysis.
The data collected are used to inform management and make automated or semi-automated decisions based on algorithms
or more advanced forms of AI. This may allow employers to increase control over their workers and the workplace, incorporate
rating systems or other metrics into performance evaluation, improve workers’ performance and productivity, rationalise the
organisation of work and production, reduce the cost of monitoring and surveillance, profile workers, influence their behaviours,
discipline them or improve HR management. In that context, novel fields emerge, such as people analytics and gamification.
These novel forms of monitoring and managing workers may give rise to legal, regulatory and ethical questions, as well as
concerns for OSH, in particular for workers’ mental health. Indeed, they may result in workers losing control over their jobs
and to increased micromanagement, performance pressure, competitiveness, individualisation and social isolation. Workers
may feel that their privacy is being invaded, also a source of anxiety and stress. They may be unable to take breaks when
they need to, which may cause accidents and health issues such as musculoskeletal disorders and cardiovascular diseases.
Unstable work schedules, such as the short-term schedules established automatically by algorithms, have a variety of negative
impacts on workers, including increased work–family conflict and work stress and income uncertainty. The use of workers’
data to reward or penalise them could lead to job insecurity and stress. As the key operational components of AI-based forms
of managing workers often comprise a ‘black box’, workers and their representatives may lack information on and power over
strategies adopted and decisions made.
But ethical decisions and effective strategies and systems are needed for handling the large quantity of sensitive personal
data that can be generated. Adequate legal provisions giving national labour inspectorates access to anonymised data could,
provide an opportunity for evidence-based prevention and policy-making. The need to collect data about workers should be
balanced against the rights of workers to privacy and their safety and health. It is important to ensure transparency in collecting
and using such data, and workers and their representatives should be empowered through the same access to information.
Since 2016, the European Agency for Safety and Health at Work (EU-OSHA) has been undertaking extensive foresight
research on digitalisation and OSH. From 2020, an EU-OSHA ‘OSH overview’ builds on this foresight work to provide further
information for policy, prevention and practice on the challenges and opportunities for OSH as a result of digitalisation. An EU-
wide Healthy Workplaces Campaign to be launched in 2023 will also be dedicated to digitalisation and OSH. More practical
resources will be published on EU-OSHA’s website as part of this campaign.