Answer Key - Chapter 5 - 2020 Edition
Answer Key - Chapter 5 - 2020 Edition
1 C
2 D
3 D
4 B
5 B
6 D
7 C
8 D
9 B
10 C
11 C
12 C
13 A
14 C
15 B
16 A
17 D
18 B
19 B
20 B
21 A
22 C
23 B
24 C
25 C
CASE 1 - Agenor Company
* this follows demolition cost, because you'll not incur the cost if the building is not demolished to construct the new building
**The amount of 120,000 will be used and not 240,000 because the note is the observation and procedure of the auditor, and th
***The expense is capitalized because it is obatined after the building was completed and is not part of borrowing cost under P
**** The purchase discount loss shall be recognized as expense.
***** old building cost are charge to expense as loss on disposal under PIC 2012-02
1
2
3
4
5
OLD NEW
LAND BUILDING**** BUILDING LAND IMP MACHINE EXPENSE
5,250,000 1,750,000 1,750,000
375,000 125,000 125,000
112,500 37,500 37,500
150,000
300,000
410,000
12,000,000
210,000
130,000
290,000
110,000
90,000
200,000
50,000
20,000
200,000
1,210,000
4,900,000 100,000
120,000
280,000
800,000
60,000
150,000
50,000
150,000
350,000
6,147,500 1,912,500 12,990,000 1,700,000 6,360,000 2,782,500
SUMMARY OF ANSWERS:
6,147,500
12,990,000
1,700,000
6,360,000
2,782,500
Note 1:
Cash 5,500,000
Shares 1,500,000
Total 7,000,000 x45/60 5,250,000
7,000,000 x15/60 1,750,000 charge to profit or loss as loss on disposal
Realtor commission:
500,000 x45/60 375,000
500,000 x15/60 125,000 charge to profit or loss as loss on disposal
Legal fees
150,000 x45/60 112,500
150,000 x15/60 37,500 charge to profit or loss as loss on disposal
CASE 2 - Belus Company
Note 1:
Purchased price 30,000,000
ratio 18/25
Allocated to land 21,600,000
Note 2:
Purchase price 1,200,000
Legal fees for purchase contract and recording ownership -
Title guarantee insurance 80,000
TOTAL COST 1,280,000
* the demolition cost of old building is not capitalized since the land if for "future plant site", meaning there is an in
PIC 2012-02 preferably capitalized the cost of demolition as part of the new building, hence, the authors point of vi
OLD
Note 5: LAND BUILDING
Lump sum price (70,000 x 120) x 55% , 45% 4,620,000 3,780,000
Payment to tenants to vacate the building 100,000
Unpaid property taxes on land and building 55%, 45% 143,000 117,000
Assessment by city for sewerage project 50,000
Driveways and parking bays (land improvement)
Cost of grading and leveling 90,000
Cost of new wing attached to the building
Cost of new split type air-conditioning units (machinery)
Professional fees paid in connection to contruct the new wing
Remodeling cost prior to occupancy 200,000
Total 4,903,000 4,197,000
LAND BUILDING
Purchased price 30,000,000
ratio 7/25
Allocated to building 8,400,000 Amounts allocated 21,600,000 8,400,000 charge to P/L as loss on dis
288,000 112,000 charge to P/L as loss on dis
112,000 20,000,000
Legal fees 400,000 150,000
ratio 7/25 TOTAL 22,000,000 20,150,000
Allocated to building 112,000
NEW
BUILDING
840,000
135,000
975,000
charge to P/L as loss on disposal
charge to P/L as loss on disposal
CASE 3 - Chrysaor Corporation
LAND BUILDINGS LI
Beginning balances 400,000 3,200,000 2,000,000
a. 4,280,000 - -
b.* 800,000 2,140,000 -
c. - - -
d. - - 300,000
e. - - 260,000
f. - - -
TOTAL 5,480,000 5,340,000 2,560,000
MACHINERY OLD NEW
2,800,000 * note b LAND BLDG BLDG
- Allocation 800,000 400,000
- 120,000
- 1,600,000
- 144,000
- 232,000
738,000 44,000
3,538,000 800,000 400,000 2,140,000
* note d LI
140,000
160,000
300,000
painting of ceilings is expense because the expected life in not more than one year.
* note f MACHINE
700,000
22,000
16,000
738,000
han one year.
CASE 5- Hercules Company
LAND MACHINERY LI
beginning balance 1,100,000 1,700,000 1,200,000
Land site A 2,740,000
Improvement 820,000
Machine pruchased 970,000
Ending 3,840,000 2,670,000 2,020,000
** Note: interest capitalized is the lower between potential interest and actual interest paid.
Cap. Interest TOTAL
414,000 5,414,000
821,836 4,691,836
1,134,807 3,434,807
2,370,643 13,540,643
Potential Capitalized
414,000 414,000
821,836 821,836
1,134,807 1,134,807
and actual interest paid.
CASE 6 - Minos Company
SUMMARY OF ANSWERS
1 328,056
2 11.11%
3 344,444
4 10,328,056
igthed average rate:
10% 160,000
12% 240,000
400,000
3,600,000
11.11%
Building:
Net balance (8M - 2,268,856) 5,731,144
New deprn rate (2/16) 12.50% 716,393
* New F and F
800,000 x 2.486852 1,989,482
Additional cost 10,518
Total 2,000,000
Accumulated deprn - ME
Beginning balance 4,000,000
Current year deprn 984,333
Disposal (485,833)
Ending balance 4,498,500
Accumulated deprn - FF
Beginning balance 2,472,727
Current year deprn 544,242
Disposal (538,182)
Ending balance 2,478,788
NOTE: Leasehold improvement is depreciated with est. useful life or lease term whichever is shorter.
Estimated useful life (5 x 12) 60 months
Lease term 56 months
Cost 4,200,000
Lease term 56
Monthly deprn 75,000
months 8
Deprn. Exp. / Accum deprn 600,000
whichever is shorter.
CASE 9 - Romulus Company
Fair value less cost of disposal – 12/31/2021 higher than fair value 8,400,000
Carrying amount – 12/31/2021 with impairment 7,600,000
Gain on reversal of impairment for 2021 800,000 lower
CV 12/31/18 1,080,000
RA 12/31/18 1,054,955
Impairment loss 25,045
*** Since no information is given in 2019 for RA, then, RA is equal to CV, P923,086
RA 12/31/20 882,000
CV 12/31/20 738,469
Increase in value of asset 143,532
Limit:
Cv if not impaired 756,000
CV 12/31/20 738,469
Limit on recovery 17,532
2017 Recoverable amount
NRV (1,270,000-50,000) 1,220,000
Value in use:
200,000 x 5.328250 1,065,650
CV
1,350,000
1,215,000
1,080,000
945,000
756,000
RA 12/31/18 1,054,955
CV 12/31/18 (1,220,000 x 8/9) 1,084,444
Decrease in value of asset 29,489
RS (5,000 x 8/9) 4,444
1,054,955 Impairment loss 25,045
923,086
738,469 RA 12/31/20 882,000
CV 12/31/20 738,469
Increase in value of asset 143,532
Impairment loss 17,532
Revaluation surplus 126,000
Value in use:
205,000 x 5.14613 1,054,955
ll to be recovered.
CASE 12 - Pelias MINING
9,011,200
(5,406,720)
3,604,480
(1,843,200)
(51,200)
1,710,080
4,915,200
6,625,280
CASE 13- Memnon MINING
Depletable/Depreciable Cost
Mineral property 26,100,000 120,000 217.50
Building 1,080,000 120,000 9.00
Machinery (1/2) 900,000 120,000 7.50
Machinery (1/2) 900,000 120,000 15.00
P27,000,000 – P900,000 = 26,100,000
P900,000/120,000) x 2 = 15
Year 1
Depletion Depreciation
Mineral property (P217.50 x 6,000) 1,305,000
Building (P9 x 6,000) 54,000
Machinery (1/2) (P7.50 x 6,000) 45,000
Machinery (1/2) (P15 x 6,000) 90,000
1,305,000 189,000
Year 5
Depletion Depreciation
Mineral property (P217.50 x 12,000) 2,610,000
Building (P9 x 12,000) 108,000
Machinery (1/2) (P7.50 x 12,000) 90,000
Machinery (1/2) (P15 x 12,000) 180,000
2,610,000 378,000
Year 6
Depletion Depreciation
Mineral property (P217.50 x 12,000) 2,610,000
Building (P9 x 12,000) 108,000
Machinery (1/2) (P7.50 x 12,000) 90,000
Machinery (1/2) (P15 x 6,000) 90,000
2,610,000 288,000
Year 11
Depletion Depreciation
Mineral property (P217.50 x 6,000) 1,305,000
Building (P9 x 6,000) 54,000
Machinery (1/2) (P7.50 x 6,000) 45,000
Machinery (1/2) -
1,305,000 99,000
Year 1
Depletion Depreciation
Mineral property (P217.50 x 5,000) 1,087,500
Building (P9 x 5,000) 45,000
Machinery (1/2) (P7.50 x 5,000) 37,500
Machinery (1/2) (P15 x 5,000) 75,000
1,087,500 157,500
CASE 14 - Cronus
3. Entry made:
4,000,000
1,000,000
CASE 15 - Poseidon Company
MC CASE 1
1 C
2 A
3 D
4 C
5 B
5 B
MC CASE 2
1 A
2 B
3 A
MC CASE 3
1 B
2 A
3 B
4 D
5 C
MC CASE 4
1
2
3
MC CASE 5
1
2