GFRC vs. Green Wall Systems: Which Works More Efficiently?
GFRC vs. Green Wall Systems: Which Works More Efficiently?
Green Wall
Systems
Which works more efficiently?
Often cost by square foot on an “FOB The value of a building with a Green wall system is very
valuable it adds 15% to 20 % to a buildings value.
Job Site” (materials only) or
The cost of a vertical garden per say is $65 per square
“Installed” cost basis (Materials and
foot. Very expensive compared to GFRC
Installation).
It’s easy to install a green wall.
Generally depends on the number of The process is similar to
factors, including the project size, Protection of all floors and surfaces
the size and complexity of the
panels, and repetion of the skins. Install frames
Install irrigation controller and hardscape
Also will depend on Location of site. Install pre-planted panels
Interestingly, NYC is more expensive
than Dallas. Install irrigation drip lines and sensors
Test the irrigation system of the living wall construction
An estimated material cost would be Initiate plant maintenance
$30-$35 per square foot.
Construction Time & Cost
GFRC Green Wall System
After
L’Oasis d’Aboukir
Design and Installation Process
Vertical gardens are built typically on solid
metal, PVC and non-biodegradable felt frame
that prevents damage to walls and allows plants
to grow on the wall without the need of soil.
They have built in water systems and require
limited maintenance.
Environmental Implications &
Sustainability Green Wall System
Reduction of thermal loading to buildings, Low
heating and cooling cost for the building.
Reduction of heat island effect
Air purification- plants are efficient filters the
pollution of the surrounding air
Plants are capable of cleaning indoor air of toxic
chemicals that are common on modern buildings.
GFRC
This cladding system is a sustainable assembly simply
because it includes materials taken from the soil and
there never is an effect on this cladding arrangement for
the environment. Compared to the mix of regular
reinforced concrete this concrete mix uses lightweight
and recycled materials. It is durable and the materials
last a long time. It reduces the time for replacement,
maintenance and repair. The lightweight panels use 80%
less material than precast. Reduces fuel and cost of
transportation to job site. A study was done by United
Kingdom’s DETR/Concrete Industry Alliance Partners in
Technology project compared GFRC to traditional precast
concrete and found that is a much lower environmental
impact by a factor of 60%
System Joints and Connections
GFRC
GFRC
Because the GFRC skin is thin, some form of water
drainage system from behind the skin should be
incorporated in the panels. Additionally, the space
between the GFRC skin and the panel frame should
be freely ventilated to prevent the condensation
of water vapor. This is generally not a requirement
in precast concrete curtain walls. A two-way joint
sealant system may be used at panel junctions
similar to that for PC curtain walls.
Rain Penetration and Moisture Control
Green Wall System
Since new technology is used in
Green Wall System such modular
trellis systems, cables, and
netting, there is a certain
distance green wall system and
the building. The rain penetration
of Green Wall System really
depends on the base wall system,
such as concrete wall.
Hydronic System
It is a hydroponic system fed by nutrient rich
water which is re-circulated from a manifold,
located at the top of the wall, and collected in
a gutter at the bottom of the fabric wall system.
Plant roots are sandwiched between two layers
of synthetic fabric that support microbes and a
dense root mass. These root microbes remove
airborne volatile organic compounds (VOCs),
while foliage absorbs carbon monoxide and
dioxide. The plants’ natural processes produce
cool fresh air that is drawn through the system
by a fan and then distributed throughout the
building. A variation of this concept could be
applied to green façade systems as well, and
there is potential to apply a hybrid of systems
at a large scale.
Thermal Insulation & R values
GFRC
The R-value of GFRC system really depends
on the thickness of the wall. The thicker
wall the more R-value will have.
Thermal conductivity of GFRC is dependent
upon composite density and moisture
content. The typical range of thermal
conductivity is 3.5 to 7.0 BTU/in./hr./ft.2/
deg F.
*Urban beautification
*Health and Welness
*Temperature Regulation
*Urban wildlife
*Property Value
*sound insulation
Bibliography
http://www.strombergarchitectural.com/materials/gfrc-leed
http://www.slate.com/blogs/the_eye/2013/09/18/patrick_blanc_s_newest_vertical_garden_gr
eening_urban_walls_around_the_world.html
http://www.ambius.com/green-walls/services/installation/index.html
http://www.ambius.com/green-walls/index.html?gclid=CIjy3tDtm7oCFROZ4AodWiYAoQ
http://gfrccladding.com/?&p=faq&q=400
http://buildipedia.com/aec-pros/from-the-job-site/zaha-hadids-heydar-aliyev-cultural-centre-
turning-a-vision-into-reality
http://xavier-architectonic.blogspot.com/
http://www.architecturenewsplus.com/project-images/32406
http://www.pearsonhighered.com
www.stonewear.com