The Nature and Concept of Alternative Dispute Resolution
The Nature and Concept of Alternative Dispute Resolution
RESOLUTION:
The Mechanism of Alternative Dispute Resolution System does not have single
form or rigid application in one particular way. There is an array of hybrid
procedure for settlement of disputes outside the Court. The ADR consists of
various alternative techniques and forms. For example Arbitration, Conciliation,
Negotiations, Mediation, Judicial Settlement, Mini Trial, Med-Arbitration and
Settlement Conferences and Neutral Evaluation are the forms of ADR
techniques. These techniques are much acceptable both to the judiciary and
common man. The ADR resolved under the law, by agreement or mutual
settlement between the parties techniques may be used in contentious matters,
which are capable of being resolved under the law, by agreement or mutual
settlement between the parties.
3)The Alternative Disputes Resolution System covers civil and commercial
nature of Disputes:
The ADR is a generic term and refer to a wide array of practices in different
forms. The settlement with judicial help and min-trials are also the forms of
ADR system apart from conciliation, negotiation, and mediations. The judicial
settlement and min-trial are important to settle the disputes in business venture.
What so ever may be the techniques used, the basic concept in ADR is to
manage and resolve disagreements between the parties at lowest cost and with
little adverse impact on business activities. The dispute resolution in ADR
system does not mean temporary settlement but to end the controversy in
perpetuity. It maintains cordiality and harmonious relationships between the
parties. The alternative methods of dispute resolution are non-adversarial and
reach speedier results because the neutral person, whether Arbitrator,
Conciliator or Mediator, as the case may be, always help to formulate the result
oriented discussions during the process settlements.
The litigation in the Court is always governed by the set of rules and regulations
under the substantive or procedural laws. For example criminal trials are
governed by Criminal Procedure Code and cases of civil nature are governed by
Civil Procedure Code or other subsidiary laws like Revenue or Land Laws,
House Rents Acts etc. But there is always scope of further litigation by way of
appeals, reviews or revisions. But the scope of further litigation in any form is
not available in the concept of ADR techniques. These techniques are applied
and used keeping in view business environment and other allied activities,
issues involved and likelihood of settlement apart from the nature of
relationship between the parties. These are the main considerations in
compromise settlement in order to end the litigation on permanent basis. The
ADR techniques terminate the litigation on permanent basis and prevent future
scope of litigation, which is an unending process in the judicial trials. Moreover,
the Mechanism of ADR System works in dispute resolution in accordance with
compromise agreement. Because the compromise agreements between the
parties are pre-requisites of their claims with reference to the performance of
promises and these are contained in that document, which is an effective
instrument in ending the controversy permanently.