Module 1A - Metacognition & Metacognitive Knowledge
Module 1A - Metacognition & Metacognitive Knowledge
INTRODUCTION
Definition of Metacognition
1
consequent regulation and orchestration of these processes concerning the cognitive objects or
data on which they bear, usually in the service of some concrete goal or objective" (Flavell,
1976). Simply stated, metacognition is "knowledge and cognition about cognitive phenomena"
(Flavell, 1979). The meaning metamorphosed into "thinking about thinking,” “knowing about
knowing," and “cognition about cognition."
Components of Metacognition
Conditional knowledge or strategy knowledge refers to the ability to know when and
why various cognitive acts should be applied. It involves using strategies to learn information
(knowing how to know as well as adapting them to novel contexts (knowing when a strategy is
appropriate). This knowledge is evident in a learner who seeks the help of a school nurse to
make a report on the communicable diseases prevalent in the community as well as this
learner's knowledge that the best way to gather the information is to interview a nurse and to
go over the health records of the Municipal Health Office of the town.
2
Metacognitive knowledge is the result of an individual's metacognitive experiences.
Flavell (1979) explained them as experiences that "an individual has through which knowledge is
attained, or through regulation occurs." A learner who obtained low scores in knowledge and
skills test becomes aware that he or she has low declarative and procedural knowledge. In
contrast, a learner who has always scored highest in both the content and skills tests has strong
confidence in his adequacy of knowledge in the subject.
EXPERIENCE
Metocognitive thinking among learners provides avenues for them to learn more. Two
aspects of metacognitive instruction is content knowledge (concepts, facts, procedures) and
strategic knowledge. It is essential that to think through a process, learners must have the
knowledge to think about something. One also needs to have a heuristic (shortcut) or algorithm
(formula) to follow in developing the skill (Medina et al., 2017). Instruction should have a
content component and direct instruction on how to work through a process.
Another consideration is the potential of cooperative learning in teaching metacognition.
Engaging learners in collaborative discussion of the learning task enables them to enhance their
learning. During the discussion, learners think about their way of thinking and their reflection
after the lesson demonstrates a metacognitive way of thinking. The learners identify the main
components of the learning strategy and realize how the strategy helps them to learn (Eldar et
al., 2012). Collaborative teaching strategies are, therefore, useful tools to enhance learners'
reflective thinking.
ASSESS
Activity 1: Use the Frayer vocabulary definition model to explain the three metacognitive
knowledge (e.g. declarative knowledge as shown below. With this as a guide, explain your
definition to the class.
Definition: Characteristics:
Examples: Non-examples:
3
Activity 2: Identify if the following thoughts are more a declarative, procedural, or conditional
knowledge. Write your answers on a separate sheet of paper.
1. I know that the context of this problem is not suited to the theory.
2. There are three ways to solve this problem.
3. This fact is essential to recall for the situation presented.
4. ROYGBIV makes it easy for me to remember the colors of the rainbow.. 5. This is an
irregular verb, thus adding –ed to the word to make it past tense does not apply.
CHALLENGE
HARNESS
1. Considering your subject specializations, choose one competency related to a topic from
a textbook used in a particular grade level, then identify the metacognitive knowledge
necessary or you to include in teaching the desired competency. Use the matrix below as
a guide.
Competency:
Subject Matter:
Metacognitive Knowledge Specific Skills to Develop in the Lesson
Declarative Knowledge
4
Procedural Knowledge
Conditional Knowledge