Field Theory Notes
Field Theory Notes
............
by
Pin-211004
E-mail: sdt@mnnit.ac.in
Shiv Datt Kumar Field Theory
2
Chapter 1
Field Theory
3
Shiv Datt Kumar Field Theory
√ √ √
3. Q( 3 2) = {a + b 3 2 + c( 3 2)2 |a, b, c ∈ Q} is field extension of Q and
√ √ √ √
[Q( 3 2 : Q] = 3. Basis of Q( 3) = {1, 3 2, ( 3 2)2 } over Q.
Proposition 1.1.2. Let L|K and K|F be finite field extensions. Then L|F is
also a finite field extension and [L : F ] = [L : K][K : F ].
4
Shiv Datt Kumar Field Theory
Pn Pm
0⇒ i=1 ( j=1 αij yj )xi = 0. Since {x1 , x2 . . . xn } is linearly independent,
Pm
j=1 αij yj = 0. Again since {y1 , y2 , . . . , ym } is linearly independent, αij = 0.
5
Shiv Datt Kumar Field Theory
6
Shiv Datt Kumar Field Theory
Theorem 1.1.8. If a, b ∈ K are algebraic over F , then a+b, ab, a/b (b 6= 0) are
all algebraic over F i.e the elements in K which are algebraic over F form a
subfield of K.
7
Shiv Datt Kumar Field Theory
m
Lemma 1.2.3. If a finite field F has pm elements, then the polynomial xp −x
m
in F [x] factors as xp − x = Πλ∈F (x − λ).
8
Shiv Datt Kumar Field Theory
m
Proof. The polynomial xp − x has atmost pm roots in F . Since
0 m −1
f (x) = pm xp − 1 = −1, all the roots are distinct and we conclude that
m m
xp − x = Πλ∈F (x − λ). Thus xp − x can not split in any smaller field
for that field would have to have at least pm elements. Therefore F is the
m
splitting field of xp − x.
Lemma 1.2.4. Any two finite fields having same number of elements are
isomorphic.
Theorem 1.2.5. For every prime number p and for every integer n, there is a
unique field having pn elements.
n
Proof. Consider the polynomial xp − x ∈ Zp [x], where Zp is a field of char p.
m
Let K be the splitting field of this polynomial. Consider F = {a ∈ K|ap =
m d n
a}. Elements of F are roots of xp − x. Since dx
(xp − x) = −1, all the roots
n
of xp − x are distinct and the field F containing all the roots is the splitting
n
field. It is sufficient to show that the set of all roots of xp − x from a field.
n n
Let a, b ∈ F be roots of this polynomial. Then ap = a & bp = b. Then
n n n n n n n
(a + b)p = ap + bp = a + b and (ab)p = ap bp = ab. If a 6= 0, (a−1 )p =
n
(ap )−1 = a−1
n
This shows that a + b, ab, a−1 are all roots of xp − x. This completes the
proof of existence of a field of order pn .
9
Shiv Datt Kumar Field Theory
Proof. Uniqueness: Let F1 and F2 be two fields of order pn . Then both are
n
splitting fields of the polynomial xp − x. Since any two finite fields having
the same number of elements are isomorphic and for every prime p. Therefore
such a field is unique up to isomorphism. Since prime fields are isomorphic
to Zp , F1 ∼
= F2 .
Lemma 1.2.6. Let G be a finite abelian group with the property that the
relation xn = e is satisfied by atmost n elements of G for every integer n.
Then G is a cyclic group.
The general finite abelian group G is isomorphic to the direct sum of finite
cyclic groups. Then G = Sp1 Sp2 . . . Spk , where pi are distinct prime divisor
of o(G), and Spi are Sylow subgroups of G. Moreover ∀g ∈ G can be written
as g = s1 s2 . . . sk , uniquely, where si ∈ Spi . Any solution of xn = e in Spi is
one of the solution of xn = e in G so that each Spi inherits the hypothesis we
have imposed on G. Since each Spi is cyclic. Suppose Spi = hai i, for some
ai ∈ Spi .
10
Shiv Datt Kumar Field Theory
1.3 Exercises
1. Consider the ring C[0, 1] with the operations of pointwise addition and-
pointwise multiplication. Give an example of an ideal in this ring which
is not a maximal ideal.
3. Prove that φ : F [x] → F [a] defined by φ(f (x)) = f (a) is a ring homo-
morphism.
11
Shiv Datt Kumar Field Theory
√ √
4. Show that 2 and 3 are algebraic over Q.
√ √
5. Find polynomial of least degree satisfied by 2+ 3.
√ √ √ √
6. What is degree of (a) 2+ 3 (ii) (b) 2 3. over Q ?
√
• K = Q( 3)
√
• K = Q( 5 7)
Z
1. Show that Fp∗n ∼
=
(pn − 1)Z
√ √
4. Show that (Q[ 4 5, 7]) is finite extensions of Q and find its degree of
extension.
Z[i]
6. Show that is a field How many elements does it have.
(2 + i)
12
Shiv Datt Kumar Field Theory
13