Comminution Handbook Edited by Alban Lyn
Comminution Handbook Edited by Alban Lyn
COMMINUTION
HANDBOOK
Published by:
THE AUSTRALASIAN INSTITUTE OF MINING AND METALLURGY
Ground Floor, 204 Lygon Street, Carlton Victoria 3053 Australia
© The Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy 2015
The Institute is not responsible as a body for the facts and opinions
advanced in any of its publications.
Dirk Bass
Dirk has been working in the field of instrumentation and control for over 20 years. In
the last 16 years he has specialised in optimising process control systems in a wide range
of industries including food and beverages, manufacturing and mineral processing. Dirk
joined PanAust Ltd in November 2011 as the Senior Advisor – Process Control, where his
current role is to develop the advanced control solutions and process control standards
for the company. He believes that mineral processing plants should be highly automated,
elevating the control room operator’s role from adjusting set points to ensuring process
objectives are achieved.
Hakan Benzer
Hakan is the Head of Mining Engineering at Hacettepe University, where he also attained
his PhD, and is Director of its International Mining Center. He leads the Hacettepe
Comminution Group and is a member of the Global Comminution Collaborative (GCC),
a research collective addressing the sustainability of comminution in the mining
industry. Hakan has been a visiting academic at JKMRC at the University of Queensland,
and is currently running several projects for the cement and minerals industry. His main
interest is on comminution and classification circuits, where his major research topic is
the modelling of dry grinding and classification circuits.
Alain Broussaud
Alain holds a Master’s degree in Physics and an Engineering degree from the School of
Mines in Nancy, France. He is currently Vice President, Virtual Plant Simulation program
at Metso Minerals and co-founded Metso Cisa (originally Cisa) in 1990. Cisa developed,
marketed and implemented original optimising technology for the mineral processing
industry, including vision systems, acoustic sensors and advanced process control
systems. While being Cisa CEO for 23 years, Alain remained involved in technical matters
and contributed to advanced control projects worldwide. His earlier assignments
include being Plant General Manager at a phosphate company in Senegal, and Deputy
Head of BRGM’s Mineral Technology Department in France, where he created the
UsimPac simulation software package in mineral processing in 1986.
Hakan Dundar
Hakan is currently an Assistant Professor in the Department of Mining Engineering
at Hacettepe University in Turkey, where he received his Bachelor, Masters and PhD
degrees in mining engineering. While comminution was the main focus of his Masters
and PhD, he also studied cement grinding (Masters) and high-pressure grinding rolls
in the minerals industry (PhD). Hakan specialises in comminution circuit design and
modelling, and is skilled in the use of modelling and simulation tools to design and
optimise a crushing and grinding circuit, as well as model development. Energy saving
and capacity improvement in a comminution circuit form his main areas of interest.
Udo Enderle
Udo graduated in Mechanical Engineering from the Technical University Munich where
he specialised in design and development. He later joined Netzsch Feinmahltechnik the
same year, and managed projects for paint and ink production plants in Europe, China and
Russia. Udo then spent several years as Head of Mill Design and was later Technical Director
for Netzsch. Since July 2009 he has been Managing Director of Netzsch Feinmahltechnik
where his focus is on technology and development. Udo holds over 100 patents and was
co-inventor of the IsaMill.
Cathy Evans
Cathy is a mineral processing engineer with over 30 years’ experience in the minerals
industry. Since graduating in Mineral Technology from Imperial College, London, she
has worked as a metallurgist in mines in South America and Australia and as an industry-
focused research metallurgist at the Julius Kruttschnitt Mineral Research Centre
(JKMRC) at the University of Queensland. During her career at JKMRC she has applied
her knowledge of processes and ore mineralogy to develop practical methods for
optimising mineral processing operations. Understanding mineral liberation is the key
to optimising comminution and separation processes as an integrated process chain,
and through Cathy’s consulting and research for industry partners while measuring and
modelling mineral liberation, she has developed a broad range of expertise in this area.
Matthew Fitzsimons
Matthew studied a Bachelor of Mechanical Engineering (Aeronautical) at the University of
the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg and graduated in 2001 with four distinctions. He began
his working career at the CSIR in the Defence Aeronautics division where notable
achievements include project managing the upgrade of the High Angle of Attack (HAOA)
capability in the Transonic Wind Tunnel Facility and being nominated for a Technological
Scientific Excellence Award as part of the Continuous Force Development and HAOA
Capability Testing Team. In 2008 he went to Murray and Roberts Steel as a Specialist
Engineer to manage research and development; this encompassed projects involving
product development, capital asset management and production optimisation. Matthew
has been at Multotec as Technical Manager for the past five years.
Bodo Furchner
Bodo earned his degree in Process Engineering at the Technical University Munich. After
his studies he worked as a scientist at the Institute for Process Engineering in Munich,
where he undertook his Doctor’s degree. In 1987 he began work for Hosokawa Alpine
in research and development and in 1995 was appointed Manager of the Test Centre
Mechanical Processing. Since 1999, he has been General Manager of the Technical
Division.
Olivier Guyot
Olivier is currently Vice President of Metso Minerals Center for Advanced Technology
(MCAT), and before that was the General Manager of Metso-Cisa. He holds a degree in
Mining Engineering from the Ales School of Mines in France, and possesses 26 years
of experience in creating and delivering innovative technology for the minerals and
metallurgical industry, including modelling, simulation and advanced sensing. Olivier
created OCS© software, a leader in advanced control for mineral processing optimisation,
as well as a series of pioneering vision and audio-based sensors, VisioFroth™ and
VisioRock™.
Cathy Hewett
Cathy is a Materials Consultant Engineer in Perth, Australia and has over 18 years’
experience within the materials, mining and manufacturing spheres. She holds a PhD
in Engineering Science from Monash University, a Bachelor’s degree in Applied Physics
(RMIT University) and a Master of Business Administration (Deakin University). The
common thread in Cathy’s career has been the mitigation of erosive and abrasive wear
using innovative materials solutions alongside engineering design.
Rick Hughes
Rick is Managing Director and Principal Consultant of Microanalysis in Perth, Australia. He
graduated from Robert Gordon University in Aberdeen, Scotland with Honours in Physics,
and has over 27 years’ experience in the industry in all facets of particulate characterisation
and sizing. Rick specialises in forensic particulate science, assisting clients from a broad
spectrum of areas to identify and understand their particulate matter and how this
impacts on their processes.
Deon Kok
Deon obtained his Metallurgical Engineering degree from the North-West University,
South Africa in 1993 and Master’s degree in Business Leadership from the University of
South Africa in 2003. He worked in various industries and capacities (gold, manganese,
steel) before joining Newmont Ahafo Ghana in 2008. He is currently the Process and
Commissioning Manager for the Ahafo mill expansion project.
Geoffrey Legrand
Geoffrey graduated from the Ecole Nationale Supérieure de Géologie in Nancy, France, and
joined Metso in 2007. He was first involved in several research and development projects
related to the VisioFroth™ technology and then in advanced process control projects
covering grinding, crushing, flotation, thickening and pelletising. Geoffrey has been
involved in projects for companies such as Rio Tinto, Newmont and AngloGold Ashanti in
more than 15 countries. He has extensive expertise in MCAT advanced sensors including
VisioFroth™, VisioRock™ and AudioMill™, and manages the APC engineering team based
in France, which supports Europe, the Middle East and Africa, as well as the hardware
production team providing vision and audio advanced sensors around the world.
Aubrey Mainza
Aubrey has a great deal of experience in the area of comminution and classification. In
addition to a year at Zambia Consolidated Copper Mines, he has spent more than 17 years
working in the comminution research group in the Centre for Minerals Research at the
University of Cape Town. Aubrey has also participated in the design and optimisation of
many mines including all the major platinum and gold mines in Africa and overseas. He is
currently working as an Associate Professor in the Department of Chemical Engineering
at the University of Cape Town and is the Head of Comminution Research and Deputy
Director for the Centre for Minerals Research.
Gunter Metzner
Gunter started his career with the Measurement and Control Division at Mintek in South
Africa as part of the team that implemented the first successful multivariable controllers
for milling. He joined the De Beers Group in 1994 to build a research group focusing on
automation, monitoring and diagnostics, and was instrumental in developing an expert
control system that successfully increased throughput and stability in diamond recovery.
Gunter has been the Manager of Process Research and Development of DebTech, has
spent some time with the Advanced Systems Group of SGS and is now the Advanced
Process Control Regional Manager for Australasia at Metso’s Minerals Centre for Advanced
Technology (MCAT), where he is involved in technologies for the control and optimisation
of minerals processing plants.
Chris Morley
Chris has 43 years’ experience in design, commissioning, operation and control of
metallurgical and materials-handling plants covering diamonds, coal, gold, silver, iron
ore, vanadium, base metals, platinum and uranium. He has experience in Australia and
internationally, and has established a recognised level of expertise in the engineering of
comminution circuits, especially in the application of high-pressure grinding rolls (HPGR)
systems for several commodities. Working on the Boddington feasibility study, Chris was
involved in the development of a practical high-capacity HPGR-based circuit – one of the
first of its kind – that demonstrated project viability and enabled project execution.
Steve Morrell
Steve is a minerals processing engineer with over 30 years of specialist experience in
comminution, where he has been involved with the design and optimisation of most
major comminution circuits in the world. In 1980 he graduated with a Bachelor's degree
(Honours) in Engineering Science from Imperial College, London, majoring in Metallurgy
and spent the next seven years working on mines throughout Africa. He subsequently
moved to Australia and completed Masters and Doctorate theses in grinding mill
simulation and power draw modelling at JKMRC. Up until 2000, when he left JKMRC to
start his own consultancy (SMCC Pty Ltd), Steve oversaw world-leading research projects
such as the AMIRA P9, High-pressure Grinding Rolls, Fine Grinding and Mine-to-Mill
programs. In 2003 he founded SMC Testing to license the SMC Test® that he developed.
Marc Revalor
Marc received his PhD in Engineering Science (design, optimisation and control of rolling
mills) in 2008, and also holds an Engineering degree from the Ecole Centrale in Lyon and
a Master’s degree in Industrial Automation. He has had four years’ experience in process
modelling and control (rolling mills, steel making) at Alcan and ArcelorMittal in France,
before joining Metso Minerals Center for Advanced Technology (MCAT) in January 2009.
Since then, Marc has been involved in advanced process control and modelling projects
worldwide, particularly for concentrators and induration plants. As Technical Expert
for Advanced Process Control and Modelling, he spent a year seconded at Rio Tinto’s
Processing Excellence Centre in Brisbane, and now leads real-time dynamic process
modelling efforts for Metso MCAT.
Etienne Roux
Etienne graduated from the University of Stellenbosch in South Africa, then joined Anglo
American Base Metals in 2003 before going to Newmont Mining Corporation in 2010.
He was responsible for the client-side implementation of the Advanced Process Control
system for the gold mill at Newmont’s Ahafo Project in Ghana, and has been involved
in technical and production roles in commodities such as zinc, copper, lead, titanium
and gold in several countries. Etienne is currently Senior Operations Superintendent at
Horsehead Corporation’s Mooresboro zinc project, where he manages operations of the
Waelz oxide leaching, solvent extraction, bleed treatment and lead recovery plants, as
well as technical support for the zinc electrowinning and casting operations.
Spike Taylor
Spike studied a Bachelor of Science (Engineering Extractive Metallurgy) at the University
of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg and graduated in 1977. He then worked for De Beers
for seven years before moving through the Graduate Metallurgist program and working
in research and development. This was followed by three-and-a-half years at Debswana
Jwaneng commissioning and operating the main treatment plant as an Assistant Plant
Superintendent. Spike has now been at Multotec for over 30 years: the first 18 years in
the sales and marketing of polyurethane and wedge wire screening media and trommel
screens for Multotec Manufacturing, followed by Sales Director for Multotec Rubber from
2002 until 2009 and then Managing Director.
Thomas E Warne
Tom is the President of Schutte-Buffalo Hammermill in Buffalo, New York, who manufacture
over 250 different models of size-reduction equipment. He served as General Manager of
Buffalo Hammermill Corp from 1991 to 2001, and became President of Schutte-Pulverizer
in 2001 where he spearheaded the acquisition of his former employer Buffalo Hammermill
Corp later that year. In 2004, Tom purchased the assets of the combined companies along
with partner James N Guarino. As President and CEO of Schutte-Buffalo Hammermill, he
guided the company to over 300 per cent growth with sales to more than 50 countries
worldwide. In December, 2014 they sold the company, though Tom continues to serve in
the role of Company President.
Mark V Weaver
Mark has been a registered professional engineer since 1989. He earned his Bachelor
of Science in Mechanical Engineering in 1984 and a Master of Engineering from the
University of Alabama, Huntsville, in 1991 while working as Spacelab Mission Lead for the
USMP-series of Spacelab Missions. He joined Polydeck Screen Corporation as Engineering
Manager in 2005, served as Director of Engineering and is now the Director of Research
and Development. During his tenure as Engineering Manager, Mark developed new
designs for trommels now used throughout the world that utilise modular synthetic
screening media.
Jobe Wheeler
Jobe has a Bachelor of Science in Mechanical Engineering from the University of
Buffalo, New York. His industrial experience in manufacturing began at Motorola,
concentrating on equipment maintenance/reliability and process improvements. He
entered the mineral processing industry in 2007 with Derrick Corporation, a leader in
fine-screening technology, with a focus on iron ore processing and comminution circuit
improvements. Since starting at Derrick, Jobe has worked on comminution projects in
the Minnesota Iron Range, Labrador Iron Trough (Canada) and several countries around
the world with a focus on improving classification efficiency and product grade, and
increasing recovery of valuable minerals.
Bob Yench
Bob originally trained as an electrical engineer in Melbourne before moving to Mount
Isa Mines in 1966 where he commenced work as an instrument engineer. He spent the
following 48 years working in instrumentation and process control, primarily in the mineral
processing industry. In 1997 Bob became the inaugural CEO and Managing Director of
MIPAC Engineering (later MIPAC Pty Ltd), a Brisbane-based specialist process control
group. His many roles in the industry over this period have included design, installation
supervision, commissioning and maintenance of process plant control systems. Bob
has had a long-term interest in promoting greater process control knowledge for plant
operators.
Acknowledgements
STEERING COMMITTEE
CONTRIBUTORS
Along with the primary contributors listed in the previous pages, the people listed below
assisted with the compilation of this book by providing contributions, comments and
advice. Their involvement in this project is greatly appreciated.
While contributions came from many sources the opinions presented in this book are the
responsibility of the Editor.
Geoffrey Barnett Managing Director, Minco Tech Australia Pty Ltd, Cardiff,
Australia
Miron E Boris Process and General Audits, Thrane Teknikk CJSC, Electrostal
(Moscow), Russia
Rob Coleman MAusIMM, Head Mineral Processing Solutions, Outotec
South-East Asia Pacific, Brisbane, Australia
Eddie De Rivera Managing Director, MIPAC Pty Ltd, Brisbane, Australia
Chris Greet FAusIMM(CP), Manager Minerals Processing Research,
Magotteaux Australia Pty Ltd, Adelaide, Australia
Yaqun He Mineral Processing Manager, China University of Mining and
Technology, Jiangsu, China
Rajiv Kalra MAusIMM, Global General Manager, CITIC Heavy Industries,
Sydney, Australia
Amit Kumar Consultant / Mineral Processing Engineer, Vancouver,
Canada
Suzanne Lynch-Watson MAusIMM, General Manager, Process and Grinding,
Multotec, Brisbane, Australia
Jeff McKay Manager, Expert Systems Global, Metso Mineral Center for
Advanced Technology (MCAT), South Jordan, Utah, USA
Mark McVey Managing Director, MMD Australia Pty Ltd, Narangba,
Australia
Gavin Pasin Regional Product Manager Asia Pacific – Mill Lining
Solutions, Metso Minerals, Brisbane, Australia
Marc Piccinin Grinding Process Engineer, The Cement Grinding Office,
Verona, Italy
Jerome Portal Export Sales Manager, Fives FCB, Lille, France
Rolf Steinhaus Sampling Specialist, Director – Multotec Process Equipment,
Kempton Park, South Africa
Ron Wiegel Mineral Processing Consultant, Lakeland, Florida, USA
Heather Wilt Director of Marketing and Communications, McLanahan
Corporation, Hollidaysburg, Pennsylvania, USA
Peter Wulff TowerMill Business Development, Eirich Group
Headquarters, Hardheim, Germany
Jawahar M Yardi Cement Engineer, Brisbane, Australia
REVIEWERS
We wish to thank the following reviewers for their helpful feedback.
Principal Sponsor
Major Sponsor
General Sponsors
Constancia copper-molybdenum project, Peru
www.ausenco.com
Major sponsor profile
JKTech
JKTech Pty Ltd is the technology transfer company for the Sustainable Minerals Institute
(SMI) at The University of Queensland, commercialising research outcomes from the
Centres of the SMI, including the Julius Kruttschnitt Mineral Research Centre.
From JKTech’s formation in 1986, comminution has been the cornerstone of its suite of
product and service offerings, including comminution consulting, JKSimMet simulation
software, breakage characterisation and training. Design and optimisation studies have
been undertaken in hundreds of mineral processing plants around the world, thereby
developing an extensive global database.
JKTech’s consulting services now utilise specialist JKTech software, equipment and
methodologies across comminution, flotation, mineralogy, mining and geometallurgy,
supported by laboratory testing and training courses.
Operating from its Australian head office in Brisbane, JKTech has subsidiary companies
in Chile and South Africa and representatives worldwide.
Contents
Chapter 1
Comminution – An Overview ....................................................................................... 1
Chapter 2
Mineral Liberation ..........................................................................................................11
Chapter 3
Particle Measurement Techniques............................................................................25
Chapter 4
Ore Comminution Measurement Techniques ......................................................43
Chapter 5
Tumbling Mills..................................................................................................................61
Chapter 6
Compression Machines ................................................................................................79
Chapter 7
High-speed Impact Mills ..............................................................................................99
Chapter 8
Stirred Mills .................................................................................................................... 107
Chapter 9
Mill Liners ........................................................................................................................ 125
Chapter 10
Classifiers ........................................................................................................................ 145
Chapter 11
Comminution Circuits for Ores, Cement and Coal ........................................... 167
Chapter 12
Milling Circuit Calculations....................................................................................... 191
Chapter 13
Modelling Comminution Circuits........................................................................... 215
Chapter 14
Process Control ............................................................................................................. 227
Chapter 15
Case Studies of Control Systems ............................................................................ 245
Chapter 16
Circuit Design ................................................................................................................ 265
Chapter 1
COMMINUTION – AN OVERVIEW
Alban Lynch
INTRODUCTION
Comminution is the process of crushing and grinding solid materials into products that
range in size from pebbles to minute particles. It is used in a multitude of industries
worldwide, including high-volume, low-product-cost industries that use ores, coals and
cements, to low-volume, high-product-cost industries that use pigments, confectionery,
cosmetics and pharmaceuticals.
This handbook is concerned with high-volume ores, coals and cements – brittle
materials for which similar machines are used for grinding and sizing classiÀcation.
These materials can be ground dry or as slurries with water. Cement and coal are both
ground dry; however, ores are crushed dry and usually ground wet as this has been
found to be more energy efÀcient. *rinding aids are used in the cement industry to
improve breakage efÀciency by minimising ball coatings. TechniTues such as this,
coupled with the sustainable need to reduce water consumption, has resulted in dry
grinding being reconsidered for ores. The total energy reTuired to grind cement, coal
and ore is high as immense amounts of these materials are used. In 2010, 4 billion tonnes
%t of ore, . %t of cement and %t of coal were ground to Àne powder in comminution
circuits. These consumed about three per cent of the electrical energy generated
worldwide. Tonnages will continue to rise, and it is expected that by 2040 they will have
increased by 2 per cent above the 2010 value.
6emi-autogenous grinding mills 6$* mills have replaced crushers and primary ball
mills in high-capacity ore plants, and high-pressure grinding rolls +3*5s and vertical
roller mills are used in cement clinker grinding circuits. Comminution machines have
become immense; large 6$* mills are now driven by 2 0: motors and large +3*5s
by 11 0: motor pairs.
CONTEXT
Comminution is usually the most energy-intensive and expensive stage of processing,
but is an indispensable stage to meet product reTuirements. This handbook is designed
to aid the selection and operation of the most efÀcient comminution circuit; however,
it assumes that the design engineer is Àrst certain that they are processing the right
material, and to the right size. Before proceeding to comminution design, the engineer
should Àrst check the following to maximise overall efÀciency
• The role of blasting in comminution in this application. Blasting is theoretically
more energy efÀcient at size reduction than crushing or grinding see Table 11.1.
The optimum balance between blasting and downstream comminution will vary
between different ores and different sites, but can have a signiÀcant impact. This
balance should be considered in the early design stages to achieve the most efÀcient
integrated site design. :hile operating sites can subseTuently improve the balance
blasting and comminution often referred to as ¶0ine to 0ill·, and described
in Chapter 11, the beneÀts are limited by the constraints of the already installed
eTuipment for ore handling and comminution. Therefore the beneÀts are likely to be
lower than those from an initial ¶holistic· design.
• The ability to exploit coarse liberation before comminution. :hile most attention
is placed on mineral liberation, site conceptual design should Àrst consider gangue
liberation. If signiÀcant gangue waste can be liberated at a coarse size see for
example )igure 2.4, it is possible to reMect a signiÀcant tonnage before energy-
intensive comminution. The energy for subseTuent mineral liberation can be
signiÀcantly reduced when techniTues such as gravity separation, dense medium
separation, particle sorting or even coarse screening can be used to remove coarse
low-grade waste. These options must be designed in the Áow sheet early since they
dictate the design of ore handling and selection of comminution eTuipment. )or
example, dense medium separation may reTuire a crushing plant and usually cannot
be retroÀt to a large 6$* milling operation.
• :hether ore heterogeneity can be exploited to reMect coarse waste. (merging
developments seek to exploit the natural grade heterogeneity of ore deposits by
reMecting low-grade pockets early in mining operations. The development of grade
sensors for coarse rocks could allow identiÀcation of low-grade intervals of ore
during early ore handling. $lternatively, ¶differential blasting· could be used to blast
low-grade zones coarser and high-grade zones Àner, with coarse low-grade removed
by screening. At the time of writing, these concepts are emerging and undergoing
large-scale site trials, but are yet to be in operation.
The purpose of this handbook is to present a summary of the information available
about the application of comminution to ore, coal and cement, and about the machines
used, which will be useful to engineers who wish to become acTuainted with the
technology.
BACKGROUND
Comminution is an ancient technology dating back to the Stone Age. This can be seen
in 20 000-year-old rock paintings in which pigments were ground Àne to form a durable
surface coating. These could only have been produced by the abrasion and attrition of
coloured minerals such as hematite red, malachite green, limonite yellow and ochres
brown using handstones, activities that had parallels in the ancient methods of grinding
seeds for food preparation. Comminution evolved slowly over several millennia with
emphasis on the more efÀcient use of muscular energy human and animal, the only
energy available to break materials. Sources of energy that replaced muscular power –
water, steam, electricity – brought step changes to comminution technology; however,
the demand for energy continued to lead supply. 0achines were invented or modiÀed
to make best use of the limited energy available, and this continued until the latter part
of the 20th century when electricity became plentiful. At this time rapid increases were
occurring in the demand for ores, cements and coals, and ample energy was important in
the rush to build larger machines. A brief chronology of the development of comminution
machines is given in Table 1.1 /ynch and 5owland, 200.
TABLE 1.1
The development of comminution machines.
Era Period Machine
Muscular power Stone Age Mortars and pestles; handstones
2000 Saddlestone mills
Before the Common Era (BCE)
500 Rotary querns for grains
200 Manual edge-roller mills
Common Era (CE)
800 Manual stamp mills for ore
1000 Water-powered rotary querns for grains
Water power
1500 Water-powered stamp mills for ore
1804 Horizontal roller mills (Cornish rolls) for ore
Steam power 1858–1881 Jaw and gyratory crushers for ore
1874–1877 Ball mills; air classifiers for cement
1900 Vertical roller mills for coal
1904 Hydraulic classifiers for ore
1930 Cone crushers for ore
1932 Autogenous mills for ore
Electricity 1948 Hydrocyclones
1960 Semi-autogenous grinding (SAG) mills for ore
1982 High-pressure grinding rolls (HPGR) for cement
1985 High-efficiency air classifiers for cement
1995 High-intensity bead mills for ore
FUNDAMENTALS OF COMMINUTION
Comminution can be deÀned as the reduction of solid materials from a coarser particle
size to a smaller particle size, by crushing, grinding and other processes, and as the
action of reducing a material, especially a mineral ore, to smaller particles or fragments.
In the past it referred to Àner particles rather than coarser pebbles, but it now refers to
both pebbles and particles.
2bMectives of comminution processes for mine waste, ores, cement and coal are to
reduce
• mine waste to a size where it is transportable by conveyor to a deposition area
• coarse rocks to a size at which particles of valuable minerals are liberated and can be
concentrated efÀciently
• the pebbles of clinker leaving the cement kiln to a size at which the surface area is
large enough to optimise the reaction of cement with water
• the size of mined coal to particles with surface area that will optimise the burning
rate.
Waste breakage is a special case that is typically carried out in a single stage using a
sizer breaker and is only practised where the waste characteristics and the geography
are suitable. :ith ores and waste, the extraction of rock from deposits by blasting or
excavators is the Àrst stage of breakage. 2re comminution then takes place in a seTuence
of crushing and grinding processes.
Crushing reduces the particle size of run-of-mine 520 ore to such a level that
the grinding mill can produce mineral and gangue as separate or liberated particles.
Crushing occurs by compression of the ore between rigid surfaces, or by impact of rocks
against surfaces. It is dry and is performed in several stages; reduction ratios being small
and ranging from three to six in each stage. The reduction ratio of a crushing stage is
deÀned as the ratio of maximum particle size entering the crusher to the maximum
particle size leaving the crusher. Crushers in use include Maw, gyratory, cone, roll and
impact crushers.
Grinding occurs by compression in roller mills and by abrasion and impact in tumbling
mills when the ore and media are in free motion, such as rods, balls or pebbles. *rinding
is a dry process for cement and coal but usually wet with ores as most concentration
processes are carried out as slurries, although dry grinding does have limited
applications. There is an overlapping range of particle sizes at which it is possible to
choose to crush or grind the ore. At the Àne end of crushing, an eTuivalent reduction
to grinding can be achieved for roughly half the energy and costs reTuired by grinding
)lavel, 1.
Depending upon size and energy considerations, grinding media include tumbling
mills with steel rods, steel balls, or sized ore A* and SA* mills. Stirred or agitated
mills represent the broad category of mills that use a stirrer to provide motion to the
steel, ceramic or rock media. Both vertical and horizontal conÀgurations exist, and since
they can operate with smaller media sizes, they are far more suitable for Àne-grinding
applications than tumbling mills. Stirred mills are thought to be more energy efÀcient
by up to 0 per cent than conventional ball mills Stief, /awruk and :ilson, 1.
They are now widely used for Àne comminution.
Principles
The initiation and propagation of cracks in rock occurs at the atomic level and was
described over 100 years ago Inglis, 11. Similarly, the energy consumed in breakage
occurs when rock fabric is disrupted at the atomic scale. Cracks propagate rapidly
through rock as the stress front moves through the matrix ahead of the crack tip. At the
macro level, rock breakage is achieved by compression, impact and attrition, as has been
discussed.
:hen a particle is broken by compression the products fall into two distinct size ranges
coarse particles, resulting from induced tensile failure, and Ànes from compressive failure
near the points of loading. 0inimising the area of loading can reduce the amount of Ànes
produced. This is often done in compressive crushing machines by using corrugated
crushing surfaces 3artridge, 1. In impact breaking, due to the rapid loading, a
particle experiences a higher average stress while undergoing strain than is necessary
to achieve a simple fracture, and tends to break apart rapidly, mainly by tensile failure.
The products are often very similar in size and shape. Abrasion produces particles that
are much smaller than the rocks involved; these rocks are rounded as rougher edges are
smoothed off. /ong-term abrasion can occur when pebbles cannot get out of a SA* mill.
This results in smooth, even polished surfaces.
Theory
Comminution theory focuses on the relationship between energy input and the particle
size produced from a given feed size. The greatest problem is that the machine itself
absorbs most of the energy input to a crushing or grinding machine, and only a small
fraction of the total energy is available for breaking the material. There is a relationship
between energy reTuired for breaking the material and the new surface area produced
in the process; however, this relationship can only be explained if the energy consumed
in creating the new surface can be separately measured. All theories of comminution
assume that the material is brittle, so that no energy is adsorbed in processes such as
elongation or contraction, which is not Ànally utilised in breakage.
n
The general eTuation E = - J.dx/x , in which the energy used is related to change in
particle size, describes the process. Three versions of this eTuation are discussed
1. 9on 5ittinger 1 proposed that
1 - 1
E = k. ` j
x2 x1
ie the energy consumed is proportional to the new surface area produced. E is the
energy input, x1 is the initial particle size, x2 is the Ànal particle size and k is a constant.
ϭϬϲ
ϭϬϱ
ϭϬϰ ZŝƚƚŝŶŐĞƌ͕
ŶĞƌŐLJ/ŶƉƵƚ;ŬtŚͬƚͿ ŶсϮ 'ƌŝŶĚŝŶŐ
ϭϬϯ
ƌƵƐŚŝŶŐ
ϭϬϮ
ϭϬ ŽŶĚ͕ Ŷсϭ͘ϱ
ϭ
<ŝĐŬ͕ Ŷсϭ
ϭϬͲϭ
ϭϬͲϯ ϭϬͲϮ ϭϬͲϭ ϭ ϭϬ ϭϬϮ ϭϬϯ ϭϬϰ ϭϬϱ ϭϬϲ ϭϬϳ
WĂƌƚŝĐůĞ^ŝnjĞ;ŵŝĐƌŽŶͿ
FIG 1.1 – How the theories of Rittinger, Kick and Bond compare with operating practice (image courtesy Hukki, 1961).
10.Wi - 10.Wi
W =c m
P F
where
Wi is the :ork Index
Grindability
Ore grindability refers to the ease with which materials can be comminuted, and data
from grindability tests are used to evaluate crushing and grinding efÀciency. The most
widely used parameter to measure ore grindability is the BB0:i, which is explored
further in Chapter 4. A variation of this reTuires the use of a reference ore of known
grindability (r that is ground for a known time and the power consumption is recorded.
An identical weight of the test ore (t is then ground for a length of time such that the
power consumed is identical with that of the reference ore (r. If t is the ore under test,
then from Bond·s eTuation
10.Wir - 10.Wir 10.Wit - 10.Wit
c m=c m
Pr Fr Pt Ft
The sizing distributions and Wir are known so Wit can be calculated (Berry and Bruce,
1. :hile the Bond test is the best-known grindability test for rod and ball mills, other
grindability tests have been developed that are suitable for the size reduction techniTue
being used. Some of these include
• the Hardgrove test for coal, which uses balls rotating in a groove
• the Drop :eight Test for ores, which uses data from breakage tests carried out with
known impacts
• the SA* 3ower Index (S3I® test, which is based on the Bond test and uses data from
tests carried out in a batch tumbling mill
• a compression grindability test (see Chapter 4.
Testing for grindability Àne feed sizes, typically less than 0. mm, is more difÀcult and
often controversial. 0ore commonly, this work is carried out in a small version of the
Ànal machine, with power being measured directly during the test.
BREAKAGE MECHANISMS
Comminution machines can be classiÀed according to the mechanisms working inside
the machine. Particles are broken by different mechanisms of impact, compression,
attrition and abrasion. A schematic view of the mechanisms is shown in Figure 1.2.
Impact Abrasion/shear Attrition Compression
FIG 1.2 – Mechanisms by which particles are broken (image courtesy Hakan Dundar).
In most cases more than one breakage mechanism occurs inside the mill, with one
generally being dominant. Impact and compression are more effective for coarse
particles, while attrition and abrasion (or shear are effective methods for Àne particles.
Impact breakage – this refers to the size reduction of a particle achieved by forces acting
on the particle, resulting from the kinetic energy of the grinding media.
Abrasion (or shear) – this occurs when particles rub against each other and the shear
forces create Àner particles. *rinding media can also promote abrasion by rubbing.
Attrition – similar to abrasion, attrition occurs when a smaller particle gets trapped
between larger particles. As the particle edges are chipped and abrasion occurs, the
combination is called attrition.
Compression breakage – breakage by applying compression to a bed of particles is the
most efÀcient method of size reduction in terms of energy utilised. (nergy is transferred
to particles by means of surrounding particles, hence interparticle breakage occurs.
COassiÀcation (si]ing) – in continuous comminution machines smaller particles
are discharged and larger particles are retained for further breakage. This internal
classiÀcation process should not be confused with external classiÀcation in which Àne
particles are separated from coarse particles after they have been discharged from the
mill and the coarse fraction is returned to the mill for further grinding. Other mechanisms
occurring inside mills include disagglomeration of clays and weakly bound particle
aggregates, and delamination of platy materials such as mica and graphite.
CLASSIFICATION MECHANISMS
ClassiÀcation in mineral processing circuits refers to the continuous separation of
particles using techniTues that exploit differences in shape, speciÀc gravity or size. The
mechanisms used for separation are screening and hydraulic and pneumatic separation.
Screening
Screening is the historical method of separating particles on the basis of size. It involves
presenting a stream of particles in either a dry form or as a slurry to a vibrating surface
containing apertures through which only the smaller particles can pass. :hen used
in a closed grinding circuit the small particles are the product and the larger particles
are recycled for further breakage. Screening is more efÀcient with slurries than with
dry particles; however, conventional vibrating screens have not been efÀcient when
aperture sizes are less than about 200 microns. High-freTuency vibrating mechanisms
enable screens with aperture sizes as Àne as 40 microns to operate efÀciently in plants.
COMMINUTION MACHINES
0any of the machines now used in comminution circuits were invented in the late
19th century because by then water wheels were large enough to provide sufÀcient,
continuous power. Jaw and gyratory crushers, vertical roller mills, ball mills, continuous
classiÀers using both sedimentation and cyclonic separation techniTues were in use by
the early 20th century. Today they are much larger and suit a wide variety of purposes,
including Àne grinding.
This handbook is concerned with ore, cement and coal, all of which have common
processing characteristics
• they are brittle
• they are processed at 4 Bta and are ground to approximately 0 per cent passing
0 microns for further use
• similar eTuipment is used for grinding and classiÀcation whether processes are wet
or dry
• eTuipment size varies from small to immense.
0achines that will be discussed in this handbook are listed in Table 1.2 and include
impact mills, sizers, low-speed and high-speed crushers, tumbling mills, stirred mills,
roller mills, Àne crushers and cyclonic and screen separators.
TABLE 1.2
Comminution machines.
Mill type Breakage Reduction F30 to P30 Maximum power (kW) Maximum mill size
Tumbling mills
Rod mill 30 mm – 500 μm
Ball mill – ore
Primary 15 mm – 70 μm 22 000 8.5 m × 13.4 m
Regrind Impact/abrasion 100 μm – 30 μm 740 3.2 m × 4.8 m
Ball mill – cement 50 mm – 70 μm 11 500 5.8 m × 19 m
Ball mill – coal 50 mm – 90 μm 2760 5.5 m × 8.2 m
AG/SAG mills 400 mm – 75 μm 28 000 12.2 m × 8.8 m
Stirred mills
TowerMill – Eirich 3 mm – 20 μm 1120
Vertimill – Metso 6 mm – 20 μm 2300
HIGmill – Outotec 300 μm – 20 μm 5000
Attrition
SMD – Metso 200 μm – 5 μm 1100
IsaMill – Xstrata 500 μm – 10 μm 8000
EiSA mill – Netzsch 250 μm – 10 μm 710
Roller mills
Roller press (HPGR) 80 mm – 40% <1 mm 11 500
Vertical Compression 200 mm – 80% <40 μm 11 000
Horizontal 38 mm – 1 mm 15
High speed crushers
Barmac – Metso 30 mm 600 60 m/s rock speed
MAG’Impact® –
130 mm 400 70 m/s rock speed
Magotteaux
Impact/attrition
Hammer mill 25:1 reduction 1800 75 m/s tip speed
Hammers 52 m/s
Atrita mill – Riley power 75 mm – 35 μm 670
Mill clips 100 m/s
Primary crushers
Gyratory 150–250 mm discharge 1200 5000–9000 mt/h
Compression
Jaw 100–300 mm CSS 400 700–1400 mt/h
Cone crushers
Standard 350–35 mm 1500 2350–2900 mt/h
Shorthead 100–6 mm 1500 1000–1400 mt/h
Compression
Rhodax – Fives FCB 150 mm 900 600 Mt/h
Vibrocone – Sandvik 150 mm 400 400
AG/SAG – autogenous/semi-autogenous grinding; SMD – Stirred Media Detritor; HPGR – high-pressure grinding rolls.
The energy efÀciency of machines varies widely, with compression machines being
the most efÀcient. Approximate values that have been suggested are (Fuerstenau and
Han, 200
• autogenous grinding (A*semi-autogenous grinding (SA* mills – three per cent
• primary ball mills – Àve per cent
• high-pressure grinding rolls (HP*5 – 2 per cent
• cone crushers – 0 per cent
• gyratory crushers – 0 per cent.
Production rates may vary widely for the same machine as they depend on the material
processed and the reduction ratio achieved.
Power intensity (k:m can be applied to mills with enclosed breakage zones.
Approximate values are
• Isa0ill – 00
• high-intensity grinding (HI* mill – 200
• Stirred 0edia Detritor (S0D – 10
• hammer mills – 20
• tower mills – 40
• tumbling mills – 21.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Berry, T F and Bruce, 5 0, 19. A simple method of determining the grindability of ores, Can
Min J, July.
Bond, F C, 192. The third theory of comminution, Trans AIME, 1944.
Flavel, 0 D, 19. Control of crushing circuits will reduce capital and operating costs, Min Mag,
0arch20.
Fuerstenau, 0 C and Han, . 1 (eds, 200. Principles of Mineral Processing, p (Society for
0ining, 0etallurgy, and (xploration /ittleton.
Hukki, 5 T, 191. Proposal for a Solomonic settlement between the theories of von 5ittinger,
Kick and Bond, Trans AIME (Mining), pp 40–410.
Inglis, C (, 191. Stresses in a plate due to the presence of cracks and sharp comers, Proc Inst Nav
Arch, /9219–20.
Kick, F, 1. 'es Geset] der Proportionalem Ziderstand und 6eine AnZendung (Principle of
Proportional 5esistance and Its Application, (Felix /eipzig, (in *erman.
Lynch, A J and 5owland, C A, 200. The History of Grinding (Society of 0ining, 0etallurgy,
and (xploration /ittleton.
Partridge, A C, 19. Principles of comminution, Mine and Quarry, (JulAug0.
Stief, D (, /awruk, : A and :ilson, / J, 19. Tower mill and its application to Àne grinding,
Min Metall Proc, 4(14–0.
Von Rittinger, P 5, 1. Lehrbuch der Aufbereitungs Kunde ((rnst and Korn Berlin, (in *erman.
Wills, B A and 1apier-0unn, T J, 200. Wills Mineral Processing Technology: An Introduction to the
Practical Aspects of Ore Treatment and Mineral Recovery, seventh edition ((lsevier Amsterdam.
Chapter 2
MINERAL LIBERATION
Cathy Evans
INTRODUCTION
The purpose of comminution is to break rock into smaller fragments as part of a process
for which the ultimate aim is to create a product to sell. Considerable amounts of energy
and capital equipment are employed to achieve this in the minerals industry. In some
industrial applications, such as aggregate production, the objective of the comminution
processes is the si]e reduction of rock to a speciÀed particle si]e to create a saleable
product. In mining and mineral processing, the purpose of the overall process is to
produce a saleable mineral concentrate, which, as the name ‘concentrate’ implies, is
higher in grade than the ore being fed into the concentrator.
In mineral processing operations, the purpose of the comminution circuit is to prepare
the ore as a suitable feed for separation processes that upgrade the material by rejecting
the particles that do not contain economic amounts of the target mineral. The implication
is that comminution changes the ore from a population of particles with a relatively
uniform grade (similar to the feed ore), to particles with a range of compositions that
allow them to be separated by composition into high-grade and low-grade streams.
Mineral liberation is the name of this phenomenon, where parent particles with a given
mineral composition break into progeny particles with a range of mineral compositions.
A simple representation of mineral liberation during breakage is shown in Figure 2.1.
As Figure 2.1 demonstrates, a single breakage event can break a particle that consists
of two minerals into progeny particles that vary both in size and mineral composition.
The composition of the progeny can vary from 100 per cent valuable mineral to
100 per cent gangue (that is, waste) mineral. The characteristics of these progeny depend
on factors such as which minerals are present in the ore, their physical properties
and how the minerals are arranged relative to one another; for example, size, shape
and spatial arrangement of the mineral grains, also described as the ore texture and
determined by mineralogical studies.
This chapter describes the aspects of mineral liberation that are of importance in
mineral processing operations.
FIG 2.1 – A simple representation of mineral liberation during breakage (image courtesy Cathy Evans).
Liberation terminology
As in any technical Àeld, the world of mineral liberation has a vocabulary that uses
common words in very speciÀc ways. Table 2.1 deÀnes some common terms used in
describing mineral liberation.
TABLE 2.1
Some common terms used in mineral liberation (images courtesy Cathy Evans).
Liberated particles
Contain only one mineral
Grade = 100%
Simplest texture
Composite particles
Contain two or more minerals. If two minerals are present, particle may be
described as ‘locked binary’; if three or minerals are present, may be described
as ‘locked ternary’
0% < grade of mineral of interest <100%
Texture of particle varies depending on relative scale of particle size and original
texture in ore
Comminution circuits are often the most energy-intensive part of a concentrator. There
is usually a balance that must be struck between grinding the feed Ànely enough to
liberate the minerals and the energy required to achieve this. In all cases, knowing what
liberation characteristics are required is an important part of determining where this
balance lies. Typically, multiple stages of comminution and separation processes are
employed to reject liberated waste minerals from the process as early as possible to
minimise grinding energy requirements. This strategy is discussed in more detail later
in the chapter.
The effectiveness of the separation process depends not just on the mineral composition
distribution of the feed particles generated through breakage and liberation, but also on
the mineral texture of the particles. If a particle is fully liberated, it will be recovered in
separation processes that use surface properties, particle density or chemical leaching
to recover the valuable mineral; however, for some ores – such as low-grade copper
porphyry ores – it is not cost-effective to grind the entire concentrator feed stream to
achieve complete liberation of the target mineral. Therefore, a signiÀcant proportion of
this valuable mineral is present in composite particles. Mineral processing engineers
need to understand how these unliberated particles, which can vary in both composition
(that is, grade of each mineral) and texture, behave in different types of separation
processes.
To illustrate the importance of mineral texture an example is provided in Table 2.2,
where three unliberated particles with quite different textures are shown in cross-
section (as would be measured by an optical microscope or automated mineralogy
system). Although the three particle types contain similar amounts of valuable mineral
(shown as the dark phase), Table 2.2 shows how the recovery of this valuable phase in
a range of mineral separation processes depends on the texture of each particle, not just
its composition. Clearly the design or optimisation of a comminution circuit to generate
a product with an appropriate level of liberation must consider what type of separation
process will be used to separate the ore.
Note that most separation processes do not require the feed stream to consist of
liberated mineral particles. In Áotation, for example, particles with as little as ten per cent
of the mineral on the particle surface can be recovered (Sutherland, 1989). Heap and
column leaching is a special case in which the feed preparation is designed to generate
relatively large particles, with intensive microfractures that allow the leach solution to
reach the surfaces of the target mineral grains. In this special case, the liberation does not
TABLE 2.2
The effect of particle texture on the recovery of unliberated minerals (image courtesy Cathy Evans).
Which unliberated particle texture allows the valuable phase to be recovered?
(All particles are same grade)
Typical particles of
valuable (dark phase)
and gangue (light phase)
shown in cross-section
By flotation DRecovered Not recovered Not recovered
By density separation DRecovered DRecovered DRecovered
By leaching DRecovered Not recovered Not recovered
physically divide the grains into separate particles; the microfractures are sufÀcient for
the chosen chemical concentration process to be effective.
:hile mineral liberation is one of the key ore characteristics considered during the Áow
sheet design stage, either explicitly with liberation measurements of the ore or implicitly
in combined grinding/separation tests, it is not often considered in the daily operation
of mineral processing plants. Concentrators generally grind the feed to a selected particle
size distribution because size can be measured easily (including online if required), while
the liberation distribution of the feed cannot. As a result, the importance of measuring
the liberation characteristics of ores in operations tends to be forgotten. Now, with the
increasing availability of liberation distribution data through measurement systems
such as the scanning electron microscope (SEM)-based automated mineralogy systems,
mineral processors are able to conÀrm whether required size and liberation distributions
are being achieved based on quantitative data. Similarly, process optimisation can be
performed in a holistic way, simulating the various parts of the process chain as an
integrated system that is linked by information about the composition of the particles in
the process streams (Wiegel, 1976; Evans et al, 2011, 2013).
One or more of these non-random fracture processes can affect the liberation
occurring during breakage and therefore the particle composition distribution of the
progeny particles.
Some comminution devices have been observed to promote non-random breakage of
the target mineral in the comminution product with subsequent beneÀts to separation.
At the industrial scale, high-pressure grinding rolls (HPGR) have been shown to
enhance breakage around mineral grain boundaries. As a result, operators have seen
improved gold and copper recovery from leach circuits and Áotation circuits ('unne,
Goulsbra and 'unlop, 1996). The diamond industry has also exploited the grain
boundary breakage of HPGRs to recover large diamonds in ‘a single comminution step,
where all diamonds of all sizes are liberated and preserved’ ('aniel and Morley, 2010).
Researchers have identiÀed other technologies that enhance liberation by promoting
non-random breakage. These include fragmentation by high voltage electrical pulses
(Andres, 1977; Wang, Shi and Manlapig, 2012) and thermal pre-treatment (Veasey and
Fitzgibbon, 1990), both of which enhance liberation by promoting fracturing around
mineral grain boundaries; however, to date neither of these technologies has made the
transition to full-scale industrial adoption.
In designing process Áow sheets, mineral processing engineers commonly seek
to minimise capital and operating costs by rejecting waste minerals as early in the
process route as possible. Process designers exploit the fact that the particle size at
which liberation occurs may differ for different minerals or groups of minerals within
the same ore. This is typically achieved by using a primary grinding stage that grinds
the ore just Àne enough to create liberated gangue particles, and composite particles
that contain enough of the target minerals to be recovered in the primary (or rougher)
separation process.
The concentrate from this Àrst separation stage passes to a further grinding stage
(typically called regrinding); here this smaller tonnage of solids is ground to the Àner
particle size required to liberate the target minerals to the stage where a saleable
concentrate grade can be achieved in the Ànal (or cleaner) separation process. This
‘liberate–separate–liberate–separate’ strategy is shown schematically in the simpliÀed
concentrator Áow sheet (Figure 2.2), where a relatively coarse primary grinding product
is produced, allowing a signiÀcant proportion of the feed mass to be rejected to Ànal
tail in the rougher Áotation section. The rougher Áotation section is operated to obtain
high recovery of the target mineral and the resulting lower grade rougher concentrate
must be ground further to create particles that are of sufÀciently high grade to meet
the Ànal concentrate grade speciÀcations. (Note that the separation processes shown in
the example are 100 per cent efÀcient, a situation that is never true in real operations.)
The beneÀts of applying this strategy can be seen in the example of low-grade porphyry
copper sulÀde ores where, at typical feed grades of less than 1.0 per cent copper, more
than 90 per cent of the feed mass must be rejected to Ànal tail. A further example of this
approach is the platinum industry in South Africa, where several grind-separate stages
may be employed to minimise the overgrinding of gangue minerals and maximise the
recovery of platinum-bearing minerals.
Clearly the strategy shown in Figure 2.2 requires much less energy and is more cost-
effective than the alternative of grinding 100 per cent of the concentrator feed to the size
required to liberate the target minerals to the level where a high-grade Ànal concentrate
can be produced.
FIG 2.2 – A concentrator flow sheet showing multiple stages of liberation-separation (image courtesy Cathy Evans).
Another example of how process design exploits liberation at different size scales can
be seen in the Mount Isa lead-zinc ore, which undergoes two distinct stages of liberation,
allowing a preconcentration stage to be deployed before the ore is ground. The texture of
the ore at the scale of centimetres can be seen in Figure 2.3, where the darkest bands are
gangue minerals and the lighter-coloured bands contain the valuable sulÀde minerals
galena and sphalerite.
The process designed to treat this ore crushes the material to the size at which the dark
waste rock is liberated (approximately 13 mm). It then uses density separation to reject
the lower-density liberated waste rock, removing approximately 30–35 per cent of the
feed mass at this early stage in the size reduction process with relatively little loss of
valuable minerals (Munro and Pease, 1988).
The product of this preconcentration stage goes on to a conventional grinding circuit
that grinds the feed to an 80 per cent Àner than 80 m to liberate the galena, sphalerite
and intergrown waste minerals prior to Áotation separation. The installation of the
preconcentration stage in 1982 increased production capacity of the Mount Isa lead-zinc
concentrator from 2.5 to 4.2 Mt/a (Black and Mutton, 1986), and reduced the energy
intensity (energy consumed per tonne of metal produced) of the operation.
MEASURING LIBERATION
A number of techniques are available to measure mineral liberation and particle
composition distributions and these are now brieÁy described.
Optical microscopy
Optical microscopy has been used for many years as a standard method to quantify
mineral proportions and mineral liberation (Jones, 1987). Generally quantitative
measurements are made on polished sections of ore particles. In the early days of
optical microscopy the data was collected by an experienced operator inspecting the
sample visually. The data collected was restricted to assessments of the proportion
of liberated mineral and the proportion locked in binary and ternary particles with
other minerals (Amstutz, 1961). In recent years the development of automated digital
optical microscopes has allowed data collection to be automated. The digital images
collected by these systems can be analysed using image analysis techniques to obtain
more detailed levels of quantitative data than the previous manual point count and
area count techniques could provide.
FIG 2.4 – Mineral liberation data examples from an automated mineralogy system (image courtesy Cathy Evans).
error does not signiÀcantly affect the usefulness of the data. A common approach to
minimise the stereological error is to measure particulate samples in narrowly sized
fractions and then arithmetically combine the results to estimate the overall particle
composition distribution for the unsized sample.
X-ray tomography
The increasing application of X-ray tomography in mineral processing (Lin and Miller,
1996; Evans et al, 2013) permits particle composition and texture to be measured in
three dimensions, generating results that are not affected by stereological bias. These
systems are becoming more common in research and development centres but have
not been installed in industrial sites to date. The mineral discrimination capabilities
of X-ray tomography systems rely on the minerals of interest exhibiting different
X-ray attenuation values. Whether X-ray tomography can quantify liberation for a
given ore depends on the minerals present in the ore. Some mineral pairs require
special measurement techniques to distinguish between them on the basis of X-ray
attenuation alone; an example here is chalcopyrite and magnetite grains, which require
measurements at two energy levels to differentiate between them. Technical advances
over the next few years – including the addition of high-resolution X-ray Áuorescence
analyses – will improve the mineral discrimination and make these systems useful
tools for measuring mineral liberation.
Heuristic models
In parallel with efforts to develop mathematical models of liberation in comminution,
mineral processing engineers have sought heuristic models (also known as ‘rules of
thumb’) to model liberation in comminution. One simple but powerful heuristic is that
the particle composition distribution in a given size fraction is the same, regardless of the
overall size distribution of the stream from which the sample comes. For example, this
characteristic means that the particle composition distribution in a given size fraction is
the same in both the feed to a comminution device and in its product. This heuristic was
Àrst identiÀed in the literature by Bprubp and Marchand (1984) working with iron ore
but it has also been shown to apply to a wide range of other ore types, including copper
ores and lead-zinc ores. The heuristic also applies irrespective of whether the breakage
device uses impact or compression breakage. The robust nature of the heuristic approach
has seen it used to model liberation in a number of applications, including gold ore and
nickel-copper sulÀde ore (Evans et al, 2011).
thus making the material heterogeneous. This heterogeneity adds to the complexity of
the modelling problem in two ways:
1. it must now cater for the breakage of two phases, which may have different breakage
and selection functions
2. it must also represent the liberation distribution of particles formed when the
unliberated parent particles are broken into both liberated progeny of each phase
and unliberated progeny with a range of compositions.
Figure 2.1 illustrates the breakage of just three classes of particles in a two-phase ore,
with liberated particles of each phase and one composite class of parent particle containing
both phases. This is a simple case where the challenge for researchers has been to develop
a model that describes the breakage from many composition classes of composite parent
particles into many composition classes of composite progeny particles.
The problem has been described mathematically by Andrews and Mika (1975) and
summarised by King and Schneider (1998) in the diagram shown in Figure 2.5. The
‘attainable region’ in this diagram shows the range of size and composition of progeny
particles it is possible to generate in breaking a parent particle of known mass and
composition denoted by point A. Conversely, the ‘feeder region’ shows the possible
range of size and composition of parent particles that could be the source of a given
progeny particle of known mass and composition denoted by point A.
FIG 2.5 – Diagram showing the relationships possible between the mass and assay
of parent particles and progeny particles (King and Schneider, 1998).
The complexity of modelling breakage and liberation is further increased by the fact
that the breakage of the ore may be random or non-random. In random breakage,
the fracture pattern of a particle is independent of its mineralogical composition and
texture. If an ore does break randomly, useful simpliÀcations can be applied to many
of the published models to obtain a solution. Indeed, many models of liberation in
comminution rely on the assumption of random breakage for their validity. Other
models – such as King and Schneider’s population balance model of liberation in
batch grinding (1998) – do not require any assumptions about random or non-random
breakage occurring, but in practice the calculations required to apply the model are
greatly simpliÀed if breakage is assumed to be random.
As mentioned, King and Schneider (1998) summarised six different types of non-
random breakage and of these, preferential breakage is a common phenomenon that
results in the appearance of the preferentially broken phase in the Àner size fractions
after breakage. This can be detected in comminution products by assaying size fractions;
often the sulÀde mineral grade of Àner size fractions is higher than the coarse size
fractions, indicating the presence of non-random breakage. Many (if not most) real ores
and breakage processes exhibit some degree of non-random breakage and the challenge
has been to account for non-random breakage behaviours in modelling liberation.
The mathematical function that describes the transfer of mass from the size and
composition classes of the parent particles to the size and composition classes of
the progeny particles is known as a kernel. In recent times the application of X-ray
tomography in mineral processing has opened up the opportunity to calibrate the
kernel for each ore by measuring the parent particles and their progeny particles in three
dimensions (Bajic, 2014). This, combined with a renewed focus on integrated simulation
capabilities (Evans et al, 2013), may lead to further advances in liberation modelling.
the proportion of the target mineral occupying the particle surface increases, the particle
ÁRWDWLRQ UDWH LQFUHDVHV 7KLV LQIRUPDWLRQ RQ KRZ SDUWLFOH FRPSRVLWLRQ DIIHFWV PLQHUDO
response can provide the basis for separation models used in integrated simulation
FDSDELOLWLHV DOORZLQJ FRPPLQXWLRQ DQG VHSDUDWLRQ FLUFXLWV WR EH VLPXODWHG DV DQ
integrated system (Evans et al
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Amstutz, * & 0LFURVFRS\ DSSOLHG WR PLQHUDOGUHVVLQJQuarterly of the Colorado School of
Mines²
Andres,8/LEHUDWLRQVWXG\RIDSDWLWH²QHSKHOLQHRUHFRPPLQXWHGE\SHQHWUDWLQJHOHFWULFDO
charges, International Journal of Mineral Processing²
Andrews,-5*DQG0LND76&RPPLQXWLRQRIDKHWHURJHQHRXVPDWHULDOGHYHORSPHQWRI
a model for liberation phenomena, in Proceedings XI International Mineral Processing Congress,
&DJOLDULSS²
Bajic, 6 &KDUDFWHULVDWLRQ RI WKH OLEHUDWLRQ NHUQHO 3K' WKHVLV 8QLYHUVLW\ RI 4XHHQVODQG
%ULVEDQH
Barbery, * 0LQHUDO OLEHUDWLRQ PHDVXUHPHQW VLPXODWLRQ DQG SUDFWLFDO XVH LQ PLQHUDO
processing, Les Editions GB4XHEHF
Bartlett,'5DQG0XODU$/'HSHQGHQFHRIÁRWDWLRQUDWHRQSDUWLFOHVL]HDQGIUDFWLRQDO
mineral content, International Journal of Mineral Processing²
Bérubé,0$DQG0DUFKDQG-&(YROXWLRQRIWKHPLQHUDOOLEHUDWLRQFKDUDFWHULVWLFVRIDQ
iron ore undergoing grinding, International Journal of Mineral Processing²
Black,%1DQG0XWWRQ%.7KHGHYHORSPHQWRIWKH+LOWRQPLQH²LQProceedings
13th Congress, The Council of Mining and Metallurgical Institutions6LQJDSRUHSS²
Daniel, 0 - DQG 0RUOH\ & &DQ GLDPRQGV JR DOO WKH ZD\ ZLWK +3*5" LQ Proceedings
Diamonds – Source to Use 2010 ConferenceSS²7KH6RXWKHUQ$IULFDQ,QVWLWXWHRI0LQLQJ
DQG0HWDOOXUJ\0DUVKDOOWRZQ
Dunne, R C, Goulsbra, A and 'unlop, I, 1996. High pressure grinding rolls and the effect on
liberation: comparative test results, in Proceedings Randol Gold Forum 96, 449 p (Randol
International Limited: Golden).
Evans, C L, Andrusiewicz, M A, Wightman, E M, Brennan, M and Manlapig, E V, 2013. Simulating
concentrators from feed to Ànal products using a multi-component methodology, SME Preprint
13–094, SME Annual Meeting, 'enver.
Evans, C L, Wightman, E M, Manlapig, E V and Coulter, B L, 2011. Application of process
mineralogy as a tool in sustainable processing, Minerals Engineering, 24:1242–1248.
Gu, Y, 2003. Automated scanning electron microscope based mineral liberation analysis, Journal of
Minerals and Materials Characterization and Engineering, 2:33–41.
Jameson, G J, 2012. The effect of surface liberation and particle size on Áotation rate constants,
Minerals Engineering, 36–38:132–137.
Jones, M P, 1987. Applied Mineralogy: A Quantitative Approach (Graham and Trotman: London).
King, R P and Schneider, C L, 1998. Mineral liberation and the batch comminution equation,
Minerals Engineering, 11:1143–1160.
Lin, C L and Miller, J ', 1996. Cone beam X-ray microtomography for three-dimensional liberation
analysis in the 21st century, International Journal of Mineral Processing, 47:61–73.
Lin, ', Lastra, R and Finch, J A, 1999. Comparison of stereological correction procedures for
liberation measurements by use of a standard material, Transactions of the Institution of Mining
and Metallurgy, Mineral Processing and Extractive Metallurgy, 108:C127–C137.
Munro, P ' and Pease, J ', 1988. Mount Isa Mines Limited heavy medium preconcentration
plant – six years after commissioning, in Proceedings Third Mill Operators’ Conference, pp 35–42
(The Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy: Melbourne).
Reid, A F and Zuiderwyk, M A, 1983. QEM*SEM: automated image analysis and stereological
applications to mineral processing and ore characterization, Acta Stereologica, 2:205–208.
Sutherland, ' N, 1989. Batch Áotation behaviour of composite particles, Minerals Engineering,
2(3):351–367.
Veasey, T J and Fitzgibbon, K E, 1990. Thermally assisted liberation of minerals – a review,
Minerals Engineering, 3:181–185.
Wang, E, Shi, F and Manlapig, E V, 2012. Mineral liberation by high voltage pulses and
conventional comminution with same speciÀc energy levels, Minerals Engineering, 27:28–36.
Wiegel, R L, 1976. Integrated size reduction-mineral liberation model, Transactions of the Society of
Mining Engineers of AIME, 260:147–152.
Wiegel, R L, 2006. The rationale behind the development of one model describing the size
reduction/liberation of ores, in Advances in Comminution (ed: S K Kawatra), pp 225–242
(Society for Mining Metallurgy, and Exploration: Littleton).
Chapter 3
PARTICLE MEASUREMENT
TECHNIQUES
Rick Hughes
INTRODUCTION
Since the inception of modern mineral processing techniques in 1880 (such as closed
grinding circuits and Áotation the methods of characterising particles haYe remained
fairl\ constant ² sieYing Zet assa\ing optical microscop\ and emission spectroscop\
:ith the adYent and increasing use of computer processing in the 180s neZ techniques
(some of Zhich are discussed in this chapter haYe eYolYed from scientiÀc progress
often championed E\ or deYeloped Zithin mineralprocessingrelated Àelds $ll the
techniques mentioned are currentl\ used in comminution to some degree ,n almost
all stages during e[ploration drilling Elasting conYe\ing EeneÀciation and shipping
there is a need to undertaNe measurements of particle si]e composition contamination
or other intrinsic properties in order to quantif\ ore grade or compliance
)igure 1 summarises the Yarious techniques that are used to measure particle si]e as
a function of particle si]e range
3article measurement starts Zith sampling 7his chapter aims to giYe the reader an oYer
YieZ of the importance of accurate suEsampling Zith particular reference to the anal\tical
techniques mentioned )urther information aEout these techniques can Ee oEtained from
*\·s ZorN (18 Zhich underpins all good sampling practice Zhile a detailed account
of sampling methods and particle si]ing techniques can Ee found in $llen (1
SAMPLING
5elatiYe to scientiÀc anal\sis sampling is the art of remoYing a small representatiYe
e[ample (NnoZn as a suEsample from the originating sample material Zith the aim
of minimising an\ ph\sical or chemical differences EetZeen Zhat Zas taNen and Zhat
remains as is statisticall\ MustiÀaEle ,n other Zords the suEsample should Ee e[actl\
the same in as man\ aspects as possiEle to the sample Eut smaller in Yolume and mass
2ften the purpose of suEsampling is to end up Zith a manageaEle fraction that can Ee
practicall\ characterised Zithin the conÀnes of time and cost ,t should Eest represent
the originating material Zithout haYing to anal\se (often conducted destructiYel\ far
greater quantities of it
$n originating sample from site might taNe the form of an entire quarr\ Eench
stocNpile Àlter caNe or conYe\or and range from tonnes to hundreds of thousands of
tonnes $ suEsample of these originating materials should accuratel\ reÁect the original
si]e and composition Zithin a mass in the range of a Nilogram or tZo
7he receiYing laEorator\ conducting the assa\ (for e[ample anal\sing for iron or gold
content Zill haYe to further suEsample the receiYed suEsample to a Yolume and mass
suitaEle for the anal\tical technique perhaps in the range of milligrams to seYeral grams
$ t\pical ;ra\ diffraction (;5' or ;ra\ Áuorescence (;5) anal\sis for e[ample
onl\ uses EetZeen tZo and ÀYe grams to oEtain a Yalid anal\tical result
SuEsampling from Àeld to laEorator\ is therefore critical in oEtaining Yalues that can
Ee interpreted as representing much larger quantities of sample Zhile anal\sing the
least amount possiEle
7here are tZo golden rules to sampling and conÀdence should onl\ Ee placed in
suEsamples that haYe Eeen acquired as folloZs
1 aEstract a suEsample Zhen the sample is in motion (applies equall\ to poZders and
liquids
sample the entire streamÁoZconYe\orprocess for a short time (or multiple short
times to oEtain the desired suEsample mass
Static suEsampling or stocNpiling Zill ineYitaEl\ lead to Eiases due to segregation
Zhich are harder to oYercome in a static sample compared to a sample in motion
Representative subsampling
2ne of the most crucial areas of anal\sis is the one that is oYerlooNed the most
suEsampling :hether it is acquiring a large enough suEsample to Ee representatiYe
accuratel\ suEsampling a heterogeneous stocNpile or simpl\ ZithdraZing a solution
from a ÁoZ line incorrect suEsampling Zill Eias an\ anal\sis that folloZs often to an
order of magnitude larger than an\ repeataEilit\ limitations of the anal\sis technique
7here are at least ÀYe t\pes of sampling error
1 settling/segregation causing layering that is unaccounted for in the abstracted
subsample
an insufÀcient subsample collected to be representatiYe of the Yariations naturally
present (may be acquisition time or mass dependent
selectiYe Ninetics during subsampling (for example moYing conYeyor sampling and
ÁoZ gradients around Áuid sampling quills/ports
a changing enYironment (is the external/subsample container the same temperature/
pressure/atmosphere as the material being sampled to preYent physical/chemical
changes postsampling"
statistical errors intrinsic to the process of subsampling that are unique to the system
being sampled and may not be minimised beloZ a certain Yalue
,t is important to remember that the stocNpile or ÁoZ line that is being monitored may
haYe tonnes or millions of cubic metres of material present Zhich is to be represented
by a subsample of a feZ Nilograms (or tens of Nilograms in the best case or litres
7his Zill be reduced in the analysis process to a feZ tens of grams or millilitres Zhich
may in turn only lead to a total analysed mass in the order of milligrams or microlitres
,t is difÀcult enough to haYe representiYity from beginning to end for one sample
let alone for the hundreds or thousands that may be being processed eYery day in a
typical laboratory
7here are many Yariations on sampling methods $ brief oYerYieZ of the most common
methods is presented in the folloZing sections
Scoop sampling
$ Yery basic method of extracting a subsample is Zith a scoop or rounded troZel
(see )igure 7his type of handheld deYice does not typically penetrate all the Zay
through a stocNpile or eYen through a smaller mass such as a bucNet it Zill often only
taNe a surface sample Zhich is unliNely to be representatiYe
Chute sampling
&hute sample splitters ()igure come in a range of orientations and sizes from small
handheld units to tabletop deYices 7hey consist of a hopper/feed area Zhere the sample
is placed and alloZed to enter an array of chutes or openings typically there are eight or
more chutes that alternate in directing the falling particulate into receptacles on either
side of the chute (there may be more than tZo receptacles 7he idea is that the chute
splits the sample into tZo representatiYe subsamples that can then be further reduced
by serial chute sampling until the desired subsample mass is obtained hoZeYer bias
can still be introduced into this technique through operators not spreading the incoming
sample oYer all chutes equally or sloZly enough
Spear sampling
$ spear sampler ()igure is designed to abstract a sample at multiple points along
the spear from a poZder held in a container (for example a bag or bucNet ,t is typically
arranged as a concentric tube Zith openings along its length that may be closed or open
depending on the orientation of the inner tube Some spear samplers use an offset in the
openings so that loZer sampling points open Àrst in a sequence alloZing the sampling
spear to only abstract a subsample from the loZer regions of the material being sampled
7hese types of samplers are Yery common in the grain sampling industry as they enable
FIG 3.4 – Concentric tube spear sampler showing holes aligned for sampling (image courtesy Rick Hughes).
the acquiring of representatiYe samples from deep Zithin grain silos or the bacNs of
grain trucNs as Zell as mineral concentrates prior to being dispatched
A B
C D
FIG 3.5 – Coning and quartering subsampling method (image courtesy Rick Hughes). (A) Cone of powdered
material, (B) flattened cone, (C) quartered cone, (D) select one quarter and repeat the cone and quarter process.
Rotary riffler
7he bias introduced by rotary rifÁing a subsample is minimised by folloZing the
golden rules of sampling a moYing poZder and sampling the Zhole stream for short
periods of time 7his produces the loZest bias of Must about all subsampling techniques
$ Yibrating hopper (top right in )igure is used to feed the sample at a set ÁoZ rate
into an arrangement of receptacles ² in this case test tubes ² that are rotating at Yariable
speeds 7he sample is moYing continuously doZn the hopper feed and selectiYely falling
into consecutiYe tubes Zith each tube collecting a representatiYe subsample of the original
7he receptacles used in rifÁers range in size from test tubes to gallon drums Zidely
used to prepare charges for test ZorN
WET/DRY SIEVING
%lindinJ Zhere the sieYe entrains trapped particulates in the mesh is the term used to
describe the limited effects of haYing more blocNed openings than there are open ones
3lacing the sieYe in a sonicating bath reYerse bloZing Zith loZpressure compressed
air gentle tapping of the entire sieYe face (not Must the mesh or one side and as a last
resort brushing trapped particulates may return the sieYe to a nonblinded and useful
state Zithout further effort $ny direct application of force (for example the use of
tZeezers or a spatula Zill undoubtedly place the sieYe beyond acceptable tolerances in
an instant *ood care of sieYes is essential if any reproducibility in the operation is to be
maintained 1o pressure or rubbing of any sort should be applied directly to the sieYe
mesh other than a Zater Met or soft paint brush to moYe the particulate around the sieYe
Basic principles
Laser diffraction particle size analysis inYolYes shining a collimated light source
(typically a 0 nanometre (nm laser through a cell carrying the sample (either Zet or
dry and onto a detector that can determine the diffracted angle 0ie (and historically
)raunhofer theory Zas used to interpret the diffraction angle against NnoZn diffraction
angles but complex matrix integrations are noZ completed by an attached computer to
report the resulting size distribution 2ptical parameters (such as refractiYe index and
absorption coefÀcients are required for optimal reÀning of submicron particles
$ll systems on the marNet today comply Zith ,S2 1000 and most offer
1C353art11 (8S )ood and 'rug $dministration 1 compliance for implementing
the setup of standard operating procedures (S23 operating analyses and record
Neeping of data
,t should be noted that apart from traceable standards there is often more than one
correct result for particle size distribution analysis )or example agglomerated state
sizing may giYe rise to a distribution that quicNly breaNs doZn as deagglomeration
occurs until equilibrium is reached and either discrete particles or the remaining bonded
particulates cannot be further broNen apart
:here carousels are aYailable for automated analyses it should be noted that S23s
are often not intuitiYe enough to fully interpret results before recording them and
disposing of the analysed subsamples Changing agglomeration/aggregation entrained
air bubbles and the settling of coarse fractions all limit the range and Yariety of samples
that may be analysed in this Zay
Instrument comparison
FIG 3.7 – Typical plot from Malvern Instruments MS2000 (image courtesy Rick Hughes).
Coulter LS230
Coulter·s patented polarisation intensity differential scattering (3,'S detector for
nanometre sizing to around 10 nm Zith increased resolution compared to other laser
diffraction instruments is an adYantage in the sizing Àeld if submicron resolution is
important 7rimodal samples at 0 0 and 80 nm can be successfully resolYed using
3,'S technology Zhich complements the loZend sizing capabilities of the laser
diffraction optics
Cilas products
Cilas manufactures a range of laser diffraction size analysers as Zell as an optically
based shape analyser 7he top of the line 110 is able to size particles betZeen 0 nm and
mm and a builtin chargecoupled deYice (CC' camera records images of particles
as they are being sized by the laser optics 7hese images can readily be incorporated into
the size distribution reporting adding Yaluable information on inÁuences of shape and
agglomeration state to the Ànal result
Cilas also produces a dynamic lightscattering instrument called the 1ano 'S Zhich
is a compact instrument capable of measuring size betZeen 0 nm and 10 m
Basic principles
7he basic principle of sedimentation studies reYolYes around the fact that Zhen
distributed homogeneously throughout a liquid and made up of the same material
larger diameter particles fall quicNly Zhile smaller particles settle more sloZly So at
any point after the initial homogenising of the sample in liquid (ie shaNing there Zill
be a population distribution of differentsized particles as a result of their different
Yelocities 7his distribution can be calculated using StoNes· laZ Zhich assumes
spherical particles and a laminar ÁoZ of the Áuid around the particles and exactly
describes the relationship betZeen the diameter of the particle and its sedimentation
Yelocity
Micromeritics SediGraph
7he SediGraph instrument operates by Àring a collimated beam of soft ;rays through
a Yessel containing suspended particles in a liquid and measuring the transmittance of
the beam at Yarious points in the Yessel oYer time By relating the transmittance of the
beam to the concentration of particles at that point and utilising StoNes· laZ a graph
shoZing the percentage of particles that haYe a particular diameter can be calculated
and plotted1
Settling column
7he settling column experiment uses the same relationship of StoNes· laZ betZeen the
speed of settling and the diameter of the particles in suspension $ large measuring
cylinder is Àlled Zith a homogenised suspension of sample and the settling rate is
recorded as sedimentation occurs $fter hours the supernatant liquid is siphoned off
and the total Yolume of settled solids and their Zeight is recorded
HYDROCYCLONE METHODS
Hydrocyclones
$ hydrocyclone is a single or arrayed deYice that imparts centrifugal forces on
particulates in suspension forcing larger or denser particles preferentially toZards the
circumference Zhich can then be split out and collected separately from the Ànes 7he
cut point (size is a function of the hydrocyclone setup particle density suspension
media Yiscosity and density and ÁoZ rate
$ hydrocyclone is shoZn in )igure 8
+ydrocylones are limited in their ÁoZ rate if speciÀc cut sizes are required
BanNs of hydrocyclones running in parallel are normally required for highYolume
applications
1. A far less common instrument is the Quantachrome Microscan, which uses similar principles and virtually the
same construction to the SediGraph to calculate hydrodynamic diameter. At the time of writing, this instrument
was no longer manufactured.
Warman Cyclosizer
7he :arman Cyclosizer (noZ manufactured by 0$5C 7echnologies has been around
in Yarious guises since the 10s ,t is a Yery simple arrangement of ÀYe consecutiYe
hydrocyclones that collect the oYersize at the top of the centrifuge (for collection Yia a
YalYe and pass on the undersize directly to the next cyclone 7he typical cut sizes are
predetermined to a large extent by the density of the particles and the ÁoZ Yelocity
as the cyclones· cut points cannot be Yaried indiYidually and are normally betZeen a
top size of 0 m and an end size of 10 m 7he underÁoZ can also be collected and is
typically in the order of hundreds of litres for a typical 0 g starting mass
$ charge of around 0 g is the maximum starting mass of the :arman Cyclosizer
Zhich means that Nilogram quantities of sample requiring size fractionation must be
processed in multiple batches
PARTICLE COUNTING
Particle counting differs from other more common sizing techniques in that it is looking
at a number distribution as opposed to a mass/Yolume distribution
Hiac/Royco
7he +iac/5oyco particle counter utilises laser extinction to determine a quantitatiYe
size distribution for loZconcentration suspensions 'epending on the detector the
measurement range falls betZeen 0 m and 00 m 7he instrument draZs a knoZn
Yolume of sample through a sampling syringe and through the test cell at a knoZn ÁoZ
rate 7he laser is directed through the sample and the obscuration caused by particles
passing betZeen the laser source and the detector is registered to determine particle
size 7he data is binned into particle count per size range to form a size distribution
Calibration is initially performed using a range of certiÀed reference standards
Yerifying the size signal and the concentration/count Calibration should be reassessed
periodically to take into account any degradation of the laser or detector
5eÁectiYity and transparency of the particles in suspension can affect the measurement
and oYerlapping particles in higherconcentration suspensions may lead to multiple
particles being detected as a single larger particle 'ilution may be necessary for such
highconcentration suspensions 7he morphology of the suspended particulates also
inÁuences the measured particle size as the particles are inÁuenced by the ÁoZ through
the test cell causing them to orient Zith the longest diameter parallel to the direction of
ÁoZ 7he Yiscosity of the suspension medium may also haYe an effect on the ÁoZ rate
and may introduce bubbles to the system Zhich Zould erroneously be measured as
particles 7he limited sample Yolume analysed can cause difÀculties Zith representiYity
so care must be taken Zith sample selection and YeriÀcation of repeatability
+iac 5oyco particle counting can be used to analyse any transparent Áuid including
aqueous samples fuels and oils 7he technique is used for fuel and oil cleanliness
testing by 1$S 18 ($erospace ,ndustries $ssociation 011 and ,S2 01 Zater
quality testing and enYironmental monitoring and many other applications including
troubleshooting Àltration systems
Zetasizer
7he 0alYern =etasizer uses surface charge (zeta potential to excite particles in
suspension using an applied electric Àeld 7he resulting motion of particles can be
picked up by a Yariety of sensors
PHOTOMICROSCOPY-OPTICAL
Basic technique
Limitations Zith the laser diffraction sedimentation and light extinction techniques
such as haYing no information on aspect ratio and relatiYely loZ uppersize limits haYe
seen optical techniques come into their oZn oYer the past decade Computational speed
coupled Zith highspeed highresolution CC' cameras haYe enabled a Zhole neZ area
of rapid analysis preYiously unaYailable
7he technique inYolYes presenting the backlit particles before the camera either as a
falling obMect or on a glass slide and capturing the resulting shadoZ image Controlling
ÁoZ and dispersion are crucial to obtaining meaningful data 'igital images are rapidly
processed to alloZ parameters such as )erret diameter perimeter aspect ratio sphericity
and roundness to all be reported for thousands – if not tens of thousands – of particles
Zithin minutes ,n many instances particle shape analysis by light techniques may
proYide better correlation Zith dry and possibly Zet sieYing and certainly in a highly
reproducible and much faster manner
Manufacturers
Retsch Camsizer
7he 5etsch Camsizer Zill simultaneously measure particle size shape and other
parameters as the dry particulate matter is fed Yia a hopper casting shadoZs onto tZo
highresolution CC' cameras 7he Camsizer has a claimed size range capability of 1 m
to 0 mm but it is likely that coincidences and representiYity Zould affect the ultimate
resolution at either end of the size scale 7he digital images can be recorded and kept for
later reeYaluation if necessary
microscope slide Zhile the stage is automatically rastered to alloZ Zide area scans of
many particles $n added beneÀt is that transmitted or reÁected light may be used as
Zell as incorporating polarisation for added particle information such as birefringence
ELECTRON MICROSCOPY
$s early as the mid180s organisations such as the CommonZealth ScientiÀc and
,ndustrial 5esearch 2rganisation (CS,52 and latterly the -ulius .ruttschnitt 0ineral
5esearch Centre (-.05C at the 8niYersity of 4ueensland had begun to harness the
synergy betZeen automated Zidearea (seYeral square centimetres electron microscopy
imaging and intuitiYe energy dispersiYe spectroscopy (E'S analysis 7he principle
inYolYes potting and polishing or thinsectioning specimens (typically but not limited
to geological samples for analysis and achieYing a Ànal polish that is optically Áat
across particles or regions of interest set in an epoxy resin Particles of carbon/graphite
may be added to the sample particulate mix to aid in particle separation Zithin the
mount 7he resulting particles or regions can be automatically imaged (usually in
backscatter electron mode and softZare can be used to calculate boundaries as Zell as
intraparticle compositional changes 7he same softZare then directs the electron beam
to areas of interest that can be semiquantitatiYely analysed to determine elemental
composition and ratios thus giYing inferred mineralogy E'S systems are often set up
as top of the market options to alloZ for Yery rapid (millions of counts per second
data collection Zhich in turn alloZs for more physical ¶area· to be analysed in a giYen
time Complimentary ;5' (discussed in the folloZing section is alZays recommended
Zhere mineralogy is not fully knoZn Phase liberation efÀciency mineral deportment
and mineral association algorithms can then interpret the particles to determine hoZ
close to the surface (perimeter each phase is for a giYen particle size shape or other
compositional or morphological Yariable
Systems currently on the market include the )E, Company·s 4E0SC$1® (4uantitatiYe
EYaluation of 0inerals by SC$1ning electron microscopy originally deYeloped by
CS,52 Zhich also incorporates elements of -.05C·s 0ineral Liberation $nalysis
(0L$ system 2xford ,nstruments· ,1C$0ineral and 7ESC$1·s ,ntegrated 0ineral
$nalyzer (7,0$ Some such as the )E, and 7ESC$1 systems are supplied on
FIG 3.9 – Wide area mineral phase map (image courtesy Rick Hughes).
X-RAY DIFFRACTION
Crystallographic analysis using ;rays Zas pioneered in the early 100s and Zas soon the
method of choice to rapidly determine mineralogical composition based on crystallinity
7he latest softZare alloZs samples to be rapidly analysed and interpreted against Yast
libraries of knoZn mineral and inorganic/organic phases (see http//ZZZicddcom to
enable fully quantitatiYe analysis for all but the most difÀcult of samples 7he technique
requires that the sample under inYestigation be ground to a Àne poZder as gently as
possible so as not to destroy the crystal structure and effectiYely render the sample
amorphous 7he pressedpoZder sample is then positioned Zithin the instrument and
bombarded Zith monochromated ;rays oYer a range of incident angles $ detector is
then moYed through an arc on the opposite side of the sample through an alignment
knoZn as 'ebyeScherrer geometry to record the ;rays diffracted from the sample
$ny regularity (lattice structure in the crystal/poZder Zithin the grains Zill then alloZ
constructiYe interference to occur and produce a peak Zithin the detector at a speciÀc
takeoff angle 7his angle can be used in Bragg·s laZ to determine the dspacing (or the
separation of the lattice of that particular mineral phase (see )igure 10
FIG 3.10 – Three lattice planes, with d-spacing, showing incoming and diffracted X-rays.
Note the black dots represent atoms (image courtesy Rick Hughes).
0ost mineral phases haYe at least three and as many as seYen or more peaks associated
Zith the lattice structure ;5' is a Yery deÀnitiYe method of determining mineral
composition and relatiYe abundance as long as it is crystalline $morphous material
present in the sample Zill only add to the background and cannot be speciated
$ typical ;5' spectrum is plotted in )igure 11 Zhich shoZs the raZ data (black line
and the interpreted mineral composition based on the dspacing peaks (red calcite
blue magnetite and green magnesite associated Zith the unit cell parameters for the
minerals· crystal structure
FIG 3.11 – Typical X-ray diffraction spectrum, interpreted (image courtesy Rick Hughes).
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Aerospace Industries Association, 011 1$S18 – Cleanliness requirements of parts used in
hydraulic systems 'ecember
Allen, 7 1 Particle Size Measurement, Yolumes 1 and (Chapman and +all London
Gy, P 18 SamplinJ oI Particulate Material, 7Keor\ and Practice (ElseYier $msterdam
Hosokawa Alpine Aktiengesellschaft, 00 +andbooN Powder and Particle ProcessinJ >online@
0 p $Yailable from https//ZZZhosokaZaalpinecom/poZderparticleprocessing/
doZnloadofbrochures/! >$ccessed 0ay 01@
International Organization for Standardization, 1 ,S2 4401 – +ydraulic Áuid poZer –
)luids – 0ethod for coding the leYel of contamination by solid particles 'ecember
International Organization for Standardization, 00 ,S2 1000 – Particle size analysis –
Laser diffraction methods 2ctober
Pike, E 5 1 7he 0alYern correlator case study in deYelopment PK\sics in 7ecKnoloJ\,
10(104–10
Salque, 0 Bogucki P , Pyzel - SobkoZiak7abaka , Grygiel 5 Szmyt 0 and EYershed 5 P
01 Earliest eYidence for cheese making in the sixth millennium BC in northern Europe
>online@ Nature. $Yailable from http//ZZZnaturecom/nature/Mournal/Yaop/ncurrent/
abs/nature118html! >$ccessed 10 -anuary 01@
US Food and Drug Administration, 1 C)5 – Code of )ederal 5egulations 7itle 1 )ood and
'rugs Source )5 144 0arch
Chapter 4
ORE COMMINUTION
MEASUREMENT TECHNIQUES
Alban Lynch, Aubrey Mainza and Steve Morrell
INTRODUCTION
The intrinsic properties of minerals that are important in industrial comminution
processes are grindability, hardness, competence, abrasion resistance and abrasiveness.
Important extrinsic properties are feed rate and feed-sizing distribution. Applying the
general breakage equation, dE = -K.dx/xnWRLQGXVWULDOFRPPLQXWLRQSURFHVVHVLVGLIÀFXOW
because K depends on both the intrinsic and extrinsic properties, and the interactions
may be complicated. The procedure for designing a circuit to comminute a new ore is
GRQHWRGHWHUPLQHWKHLQWULQVLFSURSHUWLHVLQODERUDWRU\WHVWVDQGVHDUFKÀOHVLQRUGHUWR
ÀQGGDWDRQFLUFXLWVWUHDWLQJRUHVZLWKVLPLODUFKDUDFWHULVWLFV(TXLSPHQWVL]HVFDQWKHQ
be selected for the required feed rates and the performance of the circuit can be checked
by simulation. Design companies have databases that are used in the selection process
DQGLWLVXVXDOIRUWKHLUSURFHGXUHVWREHNHSWFRQÀGHQWLDO
BREAKAGE DEFINITIONS
• Grindability LV WKH SURGXFWLRQ RI ÀQHV UHVXOWLQJ IURP WKH FRPPLQXWLRQ RI PDWHULDO
in a standard test. It is important in the selection of rod and ball mills because the
grinding loads in these mills are constant and the product size depends on the feed
rate, feed size and grindability.
• Hardness refers to the resistance of a material to deformation, indentation or
penetration by means such as abrasion, drilling, impact, scratching and/or wear.
Hardness is important in the selection of autogenous grinding and semi-autogenous
grinding (AG/SAG) mills because their performance is dominated by the rate at
which the load breaks down; that is, resistance to deformation.
• Competence is the resistance of the coarser ore sizes to breakage. Ores are usually
UHJDUGHG DV ¶FRPSHWHQW· LI WKH VSHFLÀF HQHUJ\ WKH\ UHTXLUH LQ 6$* PLOOV LV KLJKHU
E = 2.K. (1/ x2 - 1/ x1 )
10 - 10
Plant data W = Wi : c m (1)
P F
where:
W is the energy consumption of the mill in kWh / short ton
Wi is the Work Index
P and F are the 80 per cent passing sizes of the product and feed in μm
44.5
Laboratory data Wib = (2)
0.23
0.82 10 - 10
P1 G bp c m
P F
where:
Wib is the ball mill Work Index in kWh/short ton
Pi is the test sieve aperture size in μm
Gbp is the ball mill grindability in grams/rev
P and F are the 80 per cent passing sizes of the feed and product respectively
Bond’s procedure for mill selection was:
• determine the grindability of the ore in the standard laboratory test
• calculate the laboratory Wi from the grindability and use it as the plant Wi
• knowing Wi and F80, calculate W (kWh/t) for the required value of P80
• calculate the power required for the feed rate and select the mill that delivers the
power required.
The methodology Bond developed for mill selection is still widely used. The
Bond equation was based on data from ball mills used in the 1920s to 1950s that
did not exceed a 4 m diameter. It linked power consumption, mill throughput
and ore grindability, and became widely used for mill selection. Predictions on
the performances of mills that were selected by this procedure were considered
reasonably close to what were observed when variations in the ores being processed
were taken into account.
When 5.5 m diameter ball mills were installed at Bougainville in Papua New Guinea
and Pinto Valley in Arizona in the late 1970s, discrepancies were found to occur.
At Bougainville there were serious disparities between predictions using Bond’s
equation and what were observed, but these were much smaller at Pinto Valley. This led
to a detailed analysis of the performance of large mills (Society for Mining, Metallurgy,
DQG ([SORUDWLRQ :KLWHQ DQG .DYHWVN\ DQG LW EHFDPH DSSDUHQW WKDW WKH
volume of +5.5 mm particles in the feed to the ball mill (fresh feed and circulating load)
was a crucial factor. This was high for the mills at Bougainville and much lower for mills
DW3LQWR9DOOH\%RWKPLOOVZHUHIHGIURPÀQHFUXVKHUVEXWWKHIHHGUDWHIRUWKH3LQWR
9DOOH\PLOOZDVORZHUDQGWKHEDOOPLOOFLUFXLWJDYHDÀQHUSURGXFW2QFHWKHPP
particles were discharged from the mill they were recycled to the mill feed, increasing
the effect of the coarse feed.
When SAG mills and large diameter ball mills were used in series, as is now common,
WKHWUDQVIHUVL]HIURPWKH6$*PLOOWRWKHEDOOPLOOFLUFXLWZDVÀQHUWKDQIURPFUXVKHUWR
ball mill, and the problem presented by 5.5 mm particles was reduced.
The difference between actual and predicted capacities using the Bond equations
highlighted the need to use correction factors in the Bond equation according to
conditions, so design companies developed factors based on their own data; however,
WKH HPHUJHQFH RI YHUWLFDO UROOHU PLOOV DV HQHUJ\HIÀFLHQW FRPPLQXWLRQ PDFKLQHV RYHU
wide ranges of rock/particle sizes may change the concept of how large capacity
comminution circuits are designed.
This discussion has referred to the Bond grindability test and the Bond Work Index for
ball mills. There is a rod mill grindability and a Bond Rod Mill Work Index (BRMWi)
for coarser particles, typically passing 12.7 mm. The test procedure for determining
the rod mill grindability is similar to that for ball mills (Bond, 1961) but the mill
is 0.305 m × 0.610 m (with wave liners of a form described by Bond) and it runs at
40 rev/min. The charge consists of eight rods weighing a total of 33.38 kg. Initially a
PO VXEVDPSOH RI IHHG LV SUHSDUHG IRU XVH LQ WKH ÀUVW EDWFK JULQG DQG JULQGLQJ
proceeds in cycles to develop a 100 per cent circulating load on the screen representing
the desired product. The procedure for rod mill selection is the same as the procedure
for ball mill selection that has been described. Rod mills were used during the 1950s to
VEXWWKH\KDYHQRZEHHQUHSODFHGE\ÀQHFUXVKHUV7DEOHGLVSOD\VWKHUDQJHVRI
BRMWi values that indicate ore hardness.
TABLE 4.1
Typical ranges of Bond Rod Mill Work Index values (Bailey, 2012).
Property Soft Medium Hard Very hard
Bond Rod Mill Work Index 7–9 9–14 14–20 >20
PDQ\\HDUVRQSXOYHULVHUHIÀFLHQF\DQGGHYLVHGDJULQGDELOLW\WHVWIRUFRDOWKDWEHFDPH
an industry standard. Figure 4.1 reveals a part of the testing apparatus.
The test procedure is to place a 50 g sample of coal in a stationary grinding bowl in
which eight steel balls can run in a circular path. This specimen has been taken from a
larger sample of feed with a maximum size of 4.75 mm and prepared in the size range
1.18 × 0.6 mm. A loaded ring is placed on top of the balls with a gravity load of 29 kg.
After 60 revolutions, the ground sample is sieved to determine the amount of material
passing 74 μm. The HGI is calculated from the equation:
where:
W is the weight of the particles smaller than 74 μm in grams (ASTM International,
2012)
The higher the HGI value, the easier it is to pulverise the coal. The HGI value is used as
an indicator for the power consumption by the coal pulveriser. The empirical relationship
0.91
between HGI and the Bond Work Index is Wi = 435/HGI . The usual range of HGI values
is 40 to 70, with easy-to-grind material having the higher values.
FIG 4.1 – Cross-section of Hardgrove Grindability Index test apparatus (AS 1038.20-2002
Figure 1 section AA – reproduced with permission from SAI Global Ltd under Licence 1410-c082).
ZEISEL TEST
In this test, the same apparatus is used as in the Hardgrove test but the grindability
LVH[SUHVVHGLQNLORMRXOHVN-RUNLORJUDPVNJDQGWKHVSHFLÀFVXUIDFHDUHD%ODLQH
number) of the undersized product is measured. The feed is 0.8–1 mm and 30 g of feed
is added to the apparatus at the start of the test. The revolutions are chosen to reduce
the feed to 50 per cent passing 0.125 mm. The undersized is removed and replaced by
new feed. The process is repeated with the number of revolutions selected to produce
50 per cent undersized until a steady state is reached. The Blaine number of the
undersized is then determined. This test is favoured for vertical roller mills because
LW ZRUNV E\ FRPSUHVVLRQ 7KH UHODWLRQVKLS EHWZHHQ VSHFLÀF FRPPLQXWLRQ HQHUJ\
DQGVSHFLÀFVXUIDFHLVVKRZQLQ)LJXUH7KH=HLVHOWHVWLVXVHGWRFKDUDFWHULVHWKH
JULQGDELOLW\RIPDWHULDOVWKDWDUHWREHJURXQGLQDYHUWLFDOUROOHUPLOODQH[DPSOHLV
JUDQXODWHGEODVWIXUQDFHVODJ
ZĞƋƵŝƌĞĚƐƉĞĐŝĨŝĐĐŽŵŵŝŶƵƚŝŽŶĞŶĞƌŐLJ ϮϬϬ
ϭϲϬ
ϭϮϬ
;ŬtŚͬƚͿ
ϴϬ
ϰϬ
Ϭ
Ϭ ϱϬϬ ϭϬϬϬ ϭϱϬϬ ϮϬϬϬ ϮϱϬϬ ϯϬϬϬ ϯϱϬϬ ϰϬϬϬ
^ƉĞĐŝĨŝĐƐƵƌĨĂĐĞ;ĐŵϮͬŐͿ
FIG 4.2 – Relationship between specific comminution energy and specific surface (data from Cemtec).
TABLE 4.2
Drop Weight Test particle sizes and breakage energies.
Particle size Mean size Specific energies (kWh/t)
(mm) (mm) High Medium Low
53 × 63 57.8 0.4 0.25 0.1
37.5 × 45 41.1 1.0 0.25 0.1
26.5 × 31.5 28.9 2.5 1.0 0.25
19 × 22.4 20.6 2.5 1.0 0.25
13.2 × 16 14.5 2.5 1.0 0.25
1. http://www.jktech.com.au/drop-weight-tester-licensees
FIG 4.3 – Drop Weight Tester (image courtesy JKTech Pty Ltd).
7KH UDQJH RI VSHFLÀF HQHUJLHV DUH DFKLHYHG E\ DGMXVWLQJ WKH GURS KHLJKW DQG GURS
head mass.
The product from breaking the rock particles are collected and sized. From the resultant
size distributions a t10SDUDPHWHULVREWDLQHGZKLFKLVGHÀQHGDVWKHSHUFHQWSDVVLQJ
one tenth of the original particle size. Other characteristic tn values can be extracted.
If the tn characteristic values are plotted against t10, a family of curves such as those
shown in Figure 4.4 are obtained.
t10FDQEHFRQVLGHUHGDQLQGH[RIÀQHQHVVDQGLVUHODWHGWRWKHSURGXFWVL]HGLVWULEXWLRQ
that is, if t10 is known, the entire product size distribution can be generated. For a given
rock, t10LVUHODWHGWRWKHVSHFLÀFHQHUJ\DFFRUGLQJWRWKHHTXDWLRQ
ϭϬϬ
ϴϬ
ϲϬ
dϮ
ƚŶ
dϰ
ϰϬ dϭϬ
dϮϱ
ϮϬ dϱϬ
Ϭ
Ϭ ϮϬ ϰϬ ϲϬ ϴϬ
ƚϭϬ;йͿ
^-b.Ecsh
t10 = A (1 - e ) (4)
where:
(FV LVWKHDSSOLHGVSHFLÀFHQHUJ\
t10 is the per cent passing one tenth of the original particle size
A and b are Drop Weight Test parameters that vary according to ore hardness
A detailed description of the Drop Weight Test and the data reduction procedures
that are used can be found in Napier-Munn et al (1996). The parameters A and b have
no physical meaning but it has been found that the product A×b is a useful index of
ore hardness with respect to AG and SAG mills, albeit a qualitative one. Higher values
of A×b indicate softer ore in contrast to most hardness indicators where higher values
indicate harder ores.
To avoid this inverse relationship and to provide more easily understood Drop Weight
Test results, an additional parameter has been included. This parameter, the SAG Circuit
6SHFLÀF(QHUJ\6&6(LVWKHVSHFLÀFHQHUJ\LQN:KWXWLOLVHGE\DVWDQGDUG6$*PLOO
in a closed circuit with a pebble crusher. The standard SAG mill has a 2:1 diameter-
to-length ratio, 15 per cent 125 mm balls, 25 per cent total charge and grate open area
of seven per cent, which is 100 per cent 56 mm pebble ports. The aperture size in the
trommel D50 is 12 mm and the pebble crusher has a closed side setting of 10 mm. The
UHODWLRQVKLSEHWZHHQ6&6(DQG$ðELVVKRZQLQ)LJXUH7\SLFDO6&6(YDOXHVDUH
VKRZQ LQ 7DEOH 7KH 6&6( YDOXHV ZLOO QRW QHFHVVDULO\ PDWFK WKH VSHFLÀF HQHUJ\
required for an existing or planned mill due to the differences in many operating
YDULDEOHV KRZHYHU 6&6( YDOXHV SURYLGH DQ HIIHFWLYH WRRO WR FRPSDUH WKH H[SHFWHG
behaviour of different ores in AG/SAG milling in exactly the same way that the Bond
Ball Mill Work Index is used for ball mill circuits.
FIG 4.5 – The relationship between A×b and specific energy for the standard circuit (image courtesy JKMRC).
The second part of the JK Drop Weight Test is the abrasion-breakage low-energy test,
which uses a tumbling test of a selected single-size fraction.
The standard abrasion test tumbles 3 kg of -55 +38 mm particles for ten minutes at
SHUFHQWFULWLFDOVSHHGLQDPPðPPODERUDWRU\PLOOÀWWHGZLWKðPP
lifter bars. The resulting product is then sized and the t10 value for the product is
determined. The geometric mean particle size of the original size fraction -56 +38 mm
is 45.7 mm and the t10 size is 1/10 × 45.7 = 4.57 mm. The abrasion parameter, ta, is then
GHÀQHGDVta = t10/10. The three parameters relevant to AG/SAG milling are A, b and
ta. A and b are used to characterise the impact breakage of the ore and ta is a measure of
WKHUHVLVWDQFHRIWKHRUHWRDEUDVLRQVHH(TXDWLRQ,QERWKFDVHVWKHORZHUWKHYDOXH
the greater the resistance of the ore to that type of breakage. Table 4.3 indicates some
W\SLFDOÀJXUHVIRUWKH-.'URS:HLJKW7HVWSDUDPHWHUVDQGDUHODWLYHPHDVXUHRIZKDW
they mean.
TABLE 4.3
Typical parameters for the JK Drop Weight Test.
Property Very hard Hard Moderate hard Medium Moderate soft Soft Very soft
A×b <30 30–38 38–43 43–56 56–67 67–127 >127
ta <0.24 0.24–0.35 0.35–0.41 0.41–0.54 0.54–0.65 0.65–1.38 >1.38
SCSE >10.7 10.7–9.7 9.7–9.3 9.3–8.4 8.4–7.9 7.9–6.5 <6.5
SCSE – SAG Circuit Specific Energy.
SMC TEST®
The JK Drop Weight Test requires relatively large amounts of sample. Large core is
often not available as it is relatively expensive; smaller diameter core being much more
common. This precludes the use of the drop-weight test for ore hardness variability
testing and orebody hardness mapping. The SMC Test was originally developed so that
estimates of the parameters A and b could be obtained from small drill core with sample
requirements as low as 2–3 kg (Morrell, 2004a). This is achieved by breaking only one
particle size using the JK Drop Weight Test, typically one of the three smaller sized
fractions used in the standard drop-weight test. Particles are obtained either by cutting
the core using a diamond saw or by crushing the core. The former is used when drill
core availability is severely limited. The SMC Test was developed to provide estimates
of the parameters A and b used in simulation modelling. To date, over 30 000 tests have
been conducted, making it one of the most popular ore hardness tests in use. A range of
60&7HVWSDUDPHWHUVLVQRZDYDLODEOHZKLFKFDQEHXVHGWRSUHGLFWWKHVSHFLÀFHQHUJ\
demand of conventional crushers, high-pressure grinding rolls (HPGR) and tumbling
mill circuits (Morrell, 2009). This is done using this power-based size-reduction equation
(Morrell, 2004b):
W = 4Mi (x 2 - x 1 )
f (x2) f (x1)
(5)
where:
W LVFLUFXLWVSHFLÀFHQHUJ\N:KW
x2 is 80 per cent passing size for the product (microns)
x1 is 80 per cent passing size for the feed (microns)
Mi is index related to the breakage property of an ore and determined by the SMC
Test (kWh/t)
f(xj) is -(0.295 + xj/1 000 000) where j denotes 1 or 2
)RUXVHLQ(TXDWLRQWKH60&7HVWJHQHUDWHVWKUHH0i parameters used as indexers,
namely:
• Mia – for coarser-particle milling and used for rod mills, AG mills and SAG mills
• Mic – for conventional crushing and used for cone, gyratory and jaw crushers
• Mih – for HPGR size-reduction machines.
(TXDWLRQSUHGLFWVWRWDOVSHFLÀFHQHUJ\RIWKHWXPEOLQJPLOOFLUFXLWIRUH[DPSOHLQD
FLUFXLWFRQWDLQLQJD6$*PLOODQGDEDOOPLOOLWSUHGLFWVWKHFRPELQHGVSHFLÀFHQHUJ\RI
the mills. A further parameter, Mib, is obtained from the raw data generated by a standard
%RQG%DOO0LOO:RUN,QGH[WHVWDQGLVWKHLQGH[IRUÀQHUSDUWLFOHPLOOLQJVXFKDVIRXQG
LQEDOOPLOOV7RREWDLQWKHVSHFLÀFHQHUJ\RIWKH$*6$*PLOODIXUWKHUHTXDWLRQZDV
developed using a large database of operating AG and SAG mills:
where:
6 LVVSHFLÀFHQHUJ\DWWKHSLQLRQ
f80 is 80 per cent passing size of the feed
DWi is drop-weight index (from the SMC Test)
J is volume of balls (per cent)
Ø is mill speed (per cent of critical)
f(Ar LVDIXQFWLRQRIPLOODVSHFWUDWLRXQVSHFLÀHG
J[ LVDIXQFWLRQRIWURPPHODSHUWXUHXQVSHFLÀHG
a, b, c, d are constants
K is a constant whose value is dependent upon whether a pebble crusher is used
7KHFRQVWDQWVLQ(TXDWLRQSOXVWKHIXQFWLRQVI$r) and g(x) are proprietary to Citic
SMCC Process Technology Pty Ltd.
SPI® TEST
SPI stands for SAG Power Index. The SPI test is the commercial name given by the
0LQQRY(;7HFKQRORJLHVFRPSDQ\WRDODERUDWRU\RUHKDUGQHVVFKDUDFWHULVDWLRQWHVWWKH
procedure for which was originally developed by John Starkey.
The procedure involves the use of a 300 mm diameter, 100 mm long laboratory mill
loaded with 25 mm steel balls, as seen in Figure 4.6. Two kilograms of feed material are
crushed to -19 mm (P80 is approximately 12.5 mm) and ground in the mill until a product
P80 of 1.7 mm is obtained. The time in minutes to reach this point is the SPI.
The SPI parameter is used in conjunction with the following equation to predict the
VSHFLÀFHQHUJ\RI6$*PLOOV'REE\%HQQHWWDQG&RVLFN
n.
SAG (kWh/t) = K. (SPI/T 800.5) fsag (7)
where:
T80 is a rock size parameter
fsag is the submodel that incorporates effects such as feed size and pebble crushing
This is an empirical equation that predicts power used by a SAG mill from laboratory
data. SPI is determined experimentally. It is the proprietary nature of all these constants
WKDW PDNH WKH SURFHGXUH GLIÀFXOW WR XQGHUVWDQG KRZHYHU OLNH 0RUUHOO·V SURFHGXUH
SAGDESIGN™ TEST
7KH6$*'HVLJQWHVWZDVFUHDWHGVSHFLÀFDOO\IRUWKHVL]LQJRIQHZ6$*DQGEDOOPLOOV
UHIHU WR )LJXUH 7KH WHVW ÀUVW PHDVXUHV WKH 6$* SLQLRQ HQHUJ\ QHHGHG WR JULQG
ore from 80 per cent passing 152 mm to 80 per cent passing 1.7 mm as WSDT in kWh/t.
The second stage of the test measures the Bond Ball Mill Work Index on SAG ground
ore, Sd-BWi in kWh/t. SAGDesign ore feed is prepared from a minimum of 10 kg of
split or whole diamond drill core pieces or run-of-mine ore, by stage-crushing the ore
in a jaw crusher to 80 per cent passing 19 mm. The crushed ore is then ground in a
SAGDesign SAG mill (489 mm inside diameter × 163 mm effective grinding length) that
operates with parameters similar to commercial SAG mills (26 per cent total charge with
11 per cent steel load, 15 per cent ore load and rotation at 76 per cent of critical speed).
The calculated cumulative mill revolutions to 80 per cent passing 1.7 mm is used
WRJHWKHUZLWKWKHPDVVRIWKH6$*PLOOFKDUJHWRFRPSXWHWKH6$*PLOOVSHFLÀFSLQLRQ
energy. The process to determine the revolutions is done in cycles, with the minus
PPPDWHULDOÀQHVUHPRYHGIURPWKHPLOODIWHUHDFKF\FOHXSWRSHUFHQWSDVVLQJ
PP$IWHUWKHÀUVWJULQGLQJWDUJHWLVUHDFKHGWKDWLVSHUFHQWSDVVLQJPP
ERWKWKHÀQHDQGFRDUVHPDWHULDOVDUHUHWXUQHGWRWKHPLOOIRUWKHUHPDLQGHURIWKH6$*
mill-grinding cycles to reach the 80 per cent passing 1.7 mm test end point.
In industrial practice, few if any SAG mills create a product of exactly 80 per cent
passing 1.7 mm. In order to modify this product size to the exact size required for the
FIG 4.7 – SAGDesign mill (image courtesy Starkey & Associates Inc).
design, an energy factor is added or subtracted from the SAGDesign test result. This
factor is calculated using the results of the Bond Ball Mill Work Index Test conducted
as part of the SAGDesign test on SAG ground ore and is a function of the size deviation
from 1.7 mm. Factors can also be applied to model alternative mill feed sizes and/or
pebble crushing.
The 1.7 mm closing screen for the SAG test was chosen because it is close to the feed
size F80 used in a Bond Ball Mill Work Index test and matches the coarse transfer size
T80, which is often over 2 mm in large plants. In this way SAG mill energy and ball mill
energy are measured accurately.
The SAGDesign test has some potential advantages over the SPI test in that the feed
size is coarser and arguably better, indicating that the impact of critical size on SAG mill-
VSHFLÀFHQHUJ\LVFRQVLGHUHGZKLOHWKHIHHGPDVVNJDOORZVD%RQG%DOO0LOO:RUN
Index test to be conducted on the SAG test mill product. The SAGDesign test is available
from 11 laboratories around the world. A list is provided on the Starkey & Associates Inc
website.2 SAGDesign technology is open and is patented by Outotec.
2. http://sagdesign.com/home/worldwide-lab-locater
three cycles. From this data, the results of a completed SAGDesign test can be predicted.
7KLVUHVXOWLVGHÀQHGDV:SVT and is reported in kWh/t to grind from 80 per cent passing
152 mm to 80 per cent passing 1.7 mm.
This test is intended to provide a cost-effective solution for high volumes of samples
for SAG grinding test work. It also has the advantage that SVT samples can be retrieved
from storage so the remainder of the SAGDesign test procedure can be completed later
on the same sample. This allows process engineers to make an informed decision on
selecting the most appropriate samples for further testing in cases where maximum
accuracy is required on key samples for the project.
$ VXPPDU\ RI WKH YDULDEOH GHÀQLWLRQV UHOHYDQW WR 6$*'HVLJQ DQG 6$* YDULDELOLW\
testing is given below:
F80 80 per cent passing feed size (μm)
T80 80 per cent passing transfer size between the SAG and ball mill (μm)
P80 SHUFHQWSDVVLQJÀQDOSURGXFWVL]HP
WSDT SAG grindability from F80 = 152.4 mm to T80 = 1700 μm from SAGDesign test
work (kWh/t)
WSVT predicted SAG grindability from F80 = 152.4 mm to T80 = 1700 μm from SAG
variability test work (kWh/t)
Sd-BWi Bond Ball Mill Work Index on SAG ground ore (kWh/t)
(*/ HIIHFWLYHJULQGLQJOHQJWK
WSAG 6$*SLQLRQHQHUJ\IURPVSHFLÀHGF80 to T80 (kWh/t)
WBM EDOOPLOOSLQLRQHQHUJ\IURPVSHFLÀHGT80 to P80 (kWh/t)
Wtot total pinion energy from F80 to P80 (kWh/t)
6* RUHVSHFLÀFJUDYLW\
COMPRESSION TEST
7KHPRVWHIÀFLHQWPHWKRGWREUHDNSDUWLFOHVLQWHUPVRIHQHUJ\XWLOLVDWLRQLVWRFRPSUHVV
the particle bed between two plates (Schonert, 1982). Breakage by compression occurs
in vertical roller mills, which have been used since 1900 and in high-pressure grinding
rolls, which were patented in 1982.
In the piston and die test for compression grindability seen in Figure 4.8 (Otte, 1988),
QDUURZVL]HG IUDFWLRQV DUH SUHSDUHG DQG FRPSUHVVHG WR D À[HG UDQJH RI GLIIHUHQW
pressures. Particles in the bed start moving through the voids, then breakage occurs and
this continues until the desired force is reached. The change in the height of the material
bed (displacement) during the test is recorded.
From the force-displacement graph the energy levels corresponding to displacement
are calculated from the following equation:
#
h2
W = f (h) dh (8)
h1
where:
W is work
h is displacement
f is force
FIG 4.8 – Piston and die compression tester (image courtesy Hakan Dundar).
Size distributions of the compressed materials are determined by sieve analysis and
the energy–particle size distribution (PSD) relationship can be obtained for the material.
This is used to calculate the PSD for a given energy level.
TABLE 4.4
A selection of Bond Work Index values (Metso, 2012).
Material Value Material Value Material Value
Andesite 18.25 Fluorspar 8.91 Oil shale 15.84
Barite 4.73 Gabbro 18.45 Phosphate rock 9.92
Basalt 17.10 Glass 12.31 Potash ore 8.05
Bauxite 8.78 Gneiss 20.13 Pyrite ore 8.93
Cement clinker 13.45 Gold ore 14.93 Pyrrhotite ore 9.57
Cement raw material 10.51 Granite 15.13 Quartz 13.57
Clay 6.30 Graphite 43.56 Quartzite 9.58
Coal 13.00 Gravel 16.06 Rutile ore 12.68
Coke 15.13 Gypsum rock 6.73 Shale 15.87
Copper ore 12.72 Hematite 12.84 Silica sand 14.10
Diorite 20.90 Lead ore 11.90 Silicon carbide 25.87
Dolomite 11.27 Lead-zinc ore 10.93 Slag 10.24
Emery 56.70 Limestone 12.74 Spodumene ore 10.37
Feldspar 10.80 Magnetite 9.97 Syenite 13.13
Ferro-chrome 7.64 Manganese ore 12.20 Taconite 14.61
Ferro-manganese 8.30 Magnesite 11.13 Tin ore 10.90
Ferro-silicon 10.01 Molybdenum 12.80 Titanium ore 12.33
Flint 26.16 Nickel ore 13.65 Zinc ore 11.56
DSDUWLFXODUPDWHULDOFDQEHTXLWHZLGHO\GLVWULEXWHGVRWKHYDOXHIRUDVSHFLÀFPDWHULDO
must be determined by experiment.
FIG 4.9 – Picture and schematic of Hopkinson bar apparatus (image courtesy Aubrey Mainza).
:KHQWKHODXQFKHULVÀUHGWKHVWULNHUVKRRWVRXWRIWKHEDUUHODQGLPSDFWVDJDLQVWWKH
IDFHRIWKHÀUVWEDUFDOOHGWKHLQFLGHQWEDUJHQHUDWLQJDORQJLWXGLQDOVWUHVVZDYHWKDW
propagates along it. When it interacts with the specimen, a portion of this wave follows
3. Young’s modulus is a standard characterisation parameter that describes the elastic properties of a solid
undergoing tension or compression in only one direction.
WKURXJKWRWKHVHFRQGURGNQRZQDVWKHWUDQVPLWWHUEDUZKLOHWKHUHPDLQGHULVUHÁHFWHG
back along the incident bar. Both bars are mounted with strain gauges, illustrated in red
in the Figure 4.9 schematic. These output voltage signals are recorded through electronic
DPSOLÀHUVZKLFKDUHGLUHFWO\SURSRUWLRQDOWRWKHLQVWDQWDQHRXVVWUHVVDWWKHLUSRVLWLRQ
These signals can be captured and recorded over the entire loading duration by
computer and used to accurately resolve force to fracture, incident strain energy and
the fraction of this energy absorbed by the specimen during impact. For specimens of
known dimensions, deformation characteristics can be calculated, and through imaging
techniques, crack initiation and propagation can also be studied (Gross and Seelig, 2007).
SHPB is normally used to characterise material behaviour at high strain rates, so while
conventional strength tests normally apply to quasistatic-type loading environments,
this data can apply to dynamic environments. This is useful in the case of ballistic
impacts such as the design of Kevlar jackets for the military, but in comminution it is
not directly used for equipment design. In comminution, the usefulness of the SHPB is
in determining fracture criteria such as probability of fracture, cumulative damage and
strain energy of fracture. The work by Bearman, Briggs and Kojovic (1997) also suggests
that the values of Young’s modulus correlate well with parameters such as fracture
toughness (KIC), which is used in rock mechanics.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
ASTM International, 2012. D409/D409M-12 – Standard test method for the grindability of coal
using the Hardgrove machine method.
Bailey, C W, 2012. JKTech Laboratory Services Bond Rod Mill Index Test.
Bearman, R A, Briggs, C A and Kojovic, T, 1997. The application of rock mechanics parameters to
the prediction of comminution behaviour, Minerals Engineering, 10(3):255–264.
Bond, F C, 1953. Work Indexes tabulated, Mining Engineering, 5:315–316.
Bond, F C, 1961. Crushing and grinding calculations, British Chemical Engineering, 6:378–391.
Bond, F C, 1963. Metal Wear in Crushing and Grinding (Allis Chalmers Publication 07P1701).
Dobby, G, Bennett, C and Cosick, G, 2001. Advances in SAG circuit design and simulation applied
to the mine block model, in Proceedings SAG 2001, pp 221–234, Vancouver.
Engineering Toolbox, 2015. Brinell Hardness Number [online]. Available from: <http://www.
engineeringtoolbox.com/bhn-brinell-hardness-number-d_1365.html> [Accessed: 21 May
2015].
Gross, D and Seelig, T, 2007. Fracture Mechanics, with an Introduction to Micromechanics (Springer-
Verlag: Berlin).
Hopkinson, B, 1914. A method for measuring the pressure produced in the detonation of high
explosives or by the impact of bullets, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, 213:437–456.
Kolsky, H, 1949. An investigation of the mechanical properties of materials at very high rates of
loading, Philosophical Proc Phys Soc London, B62:676.
Levin, J, 1989. The Bond standard grindability test and a proposal for a standard grindability test
IRUÀQHPDWHULDOVJ SAIMM, 89(1):13–21.
McKen, A and Williams, S, 2005. An overview of the small-scale tests available to characterize ore
grindability for design purposes, SGS Minerals Technical Bulletin, 2005–06.
Metso, 2012. Basics in Mineral Processing HandbookHGV3(6DQGJUHQ%%HUJOLQGDQG60RGLJK
pp 3–24.
Morrell, S, 2004a. An alternative energy-size relationship to that proposed by Bond for the design
and optimisation of grinding circuits, International Journal of Mineral Processing, 74(1–4):133–
141.
Morrell,6E3UHGLFWLQJWKHVSHFLÀFHQHUJ\RIDXWRJHQRXVDQGVHPLDXWRJHQRXVPLOOVIURP
small diameter drill core samples, Minerals Engineering, 17(3):447–451.
Morrell, 6 3UHGLFWLQJ WKH RYHUDOO VSHFLÀF HQHUJ\ UHTXLUHPHQW RI FUXVKLQJ KLJK SUHVVXUH
grinding roll and tumbling mill circuits, Minerals Engineering, 22(6):544–549.
Napier-Munn, T J, Morrell, S, Morrison, R and Kojovic, T, 1996. Mineral Comminution Circuits –
Their Operation and Optimisation (Julius Kruttschnitt Mineral Research Centre: Brisbane).
Otte, O, 1988. Polycom high pressure grinding principles and industrial application, in Proceedings
Third AusIMM Mill Operators’ Conference, pp 131–136 (The Australasian Institute of Mining and
Metallurgy: Melbourne).
Rowland Jr, C A and Kjos, D M, 1980. Rod and ball mills, chapter 12, in Mineral Processing Plant
Design (eds: A L Mular and R B Bhappu), second edition (Society for Mining, Metallurgy, and
([SORUDWLRQ/LWWOHWRQ
Schonert,.0HWKRGRIÀQHDQGYHU\ÀQHFRPPLQXWLRQRIPDWHULDOVKDYLQJEULWWOHEHKDYLRXU
US patent 4357287, 2 November.
Society for Mining, Metallurgy, and Exploration, 1983. Mill design and grinding performance of
ODUJHEDOOPLOOV,DQG,,SUHVHQWHGWR60(²$,0()DOO0HHWLQJ6DOW/DNH&LW\2FWREHU
Whiten, W J and Kavetzky, A, 1984. Studies on scale-up of ball mills, Minerals and Metallurgical
Processing, May, pp 23–28.
Chapter 5
TUMBLING MILLS
Alban Lynch
INTRODUCTION
%DOOPLOOVZHUHWKHÀUVWWXPEOLQJPLOOV7KH\ZHUHLQYHQWHGLQWKHVWRJULQGFHPHQW
FOLQNHU EHFDXVH WKH KLJK FOLQNHU SURGXFWLRQ UDWHV RI WKH QHZ URWDU\ NLOQV UHTXLUHG
PDFKLQHV ZLWK PXFK KLJKHU FDSDFLWLHV WKDQ VWDPS PLOOV 6LQFH WKHQ EDOO PLOOV KDYH
GRPLQDWHG ÀQH JULQGLQJ 7XPEOLQJ PLOOV DUH URWDWLQJ F\OLQGHUV WKDW DUH OLQHG RQ WKH
LQVLGH7KHEDUVRQWKHOLQHUVOLIWWKHRUHDQGJULQGLQJPHGLDGXULQJHDFKUHYROXWLRQWR
DKHLJKWDWZKLFKWKHPDVVRIRUHDQGPHGLDGHWDFKHVIDOOLQJLQWRWKHWRHRIWKHPLOODV
VKRZQLQ)LJXUH&ROOLVLRQVRFFXUEHWZHHQWKHRUHJULQGLQJPHGLDDQGOLQHUVDQG
VL]H UHGXFWLRQ RI WKH RUH RFFXUV GXH WR WKH LPSDFW DQG DEUDVLRQ IRUFHV 7KH JULQGLQJ
PHGLDFDQEHVWHHORUDOXPLQDEDOOVWKHRUHLWVHOIRUERWK
&DWDUDFWLQJ DQG FDVFDGLQJ ERWK RFFXU GXULQJ WKH PLOO URWDWLRQ &DWDUDFWLQJ FDXVHV
LPSDFWEUHDNDJHZKLOHFDVFDGLQJFDXVHVDEUDVLRQDQGDWWULWLRQ7KHPLOOORDGWHQGVWR
FDVFDGHDWORZHUVSHHGVDQGFDWDUDFWDWKLJKHUVSHHGV7DEOHVKRZVWKHIDFWRUVWKDW
FDQDIIHFWEDOOPLOOSHUIRUPDQFH
FIG 5.1 – An Outotec single-compartment tumbling ball mill (left; image courtesy Outotec) and
the breakage mechanisms that operate in it (right; image courtesy the Cement Grinding Office).
TABLE 5.1
The effects of design and operating variables on ball mill performance.
Design/operating variable Effect on ball mill variables
Mill diameter Capacity, feed size, power draw
Mill length Capacity, power draw
Ball load Capacity, power draw
Ball size and distribution Size reduction
Solids per cent Discharge rate, size reduction, power draw
FIG 5.2 – Examples of two-compartment Polysius mills for grinding cement clinkers –
conventional mill (left) and double rotator mill (right; images courtesy Polysius).
ϭϬϬ
ϵϬ ϭƐƚĐŚĂŵďĞƌ ϮŶĚĐŚĂŵďĞƌ
ϴϬ
ϳϬ
йZĞƚĂŝŶĞĚ
ϲϬ
ϱϬ
ϰϬ
ϯϬ
ϮϬ
ϭϬ
Ϭ
Ϭ ϭ Ϯ ϯ ϰ ϱ ϲ ϳ ϴ ϵ ϭϬ ϭϭ ϭϮ
>ĞŶŐƚŚĂůŽŶŐƚŚĞŵŝůůĂdžŝƐ;ŵͿ
ϰ͘ϳϱŵŵ ϭ͘ϭϴŵŵ Ϭ͘ϰϮϱŵŵ Ϭ͘ϭϬϮŵŵ Ϭ͘ϬϳϮŵŵ Ϭ͘Ϭϯϲŵŵ
FIG 5.3 – Size reduction through a two-compartment cement mill (image courtesy Hakan Dundar).
TABLE 5.2
Size ranges of grinding balls in two compartments in a cement clinker mill.
Ball size (mm) 17 20 25 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
Compartment 1 (%) 5–15 20–25 20–30 20–25 15–20
Compartment 2 (%) 10–30 20–45 10–25 15–20 5–10 5–10
TABLE 5.3
Sizes of ball mills for grinding cement clinker. Mills may have one or two compartments.
KHD Humboldt FLSmidth Polysius PSP CITIC
Wedag Engineering
Mill diameter (m) 3.0–5.8 3.8–5.8 3.4–5.4 3.4–5.4 2.4–5.8
Mill length (m) 10.0–19.0 13.0–17.0 10.1–17.0 11.0–17.0 9.0–19.0
Installed power (kW) 1100–11 500 2570–9560 1600–7800 1600–7500 900–11 500
%DOOPLOOVKDYHEHHQXVHGIRUPDQ\GHFDGHVLQWKHFHPHQWPDNLQJSURFHVVIRUJULQGLQJ
UDZPDWHULDODQGFHPHQWFOLQNHUEXWWKHUHLVQRZDWUHQGWRUHSODFHWKHPZLWKUROOHU
PLOOVEHFDXVHFRPSUHVVLRQEUHDNDJHXVHVHQHUJ\PRUHHIÀFLHQWO\WKDQLPSDFWEUHDNDJH
2I WKH PLOOV VROG WR WKH FHPHQW LQGXVWU\ GXULQJ WKH ERRP \HDUV RI ²
SHUFHQWZHUHYHUWLFDOUROOHUPLOOVDQGSHUFHQWZHUHEDOOPLOOV)RUUDZPDWHULDO
JULQGLQJYHUWLFDOPLOOVZHUHLQVWDOOHGLQSHUFHQWRIQHZSODQWVZKLOHEDOOPLOOVZHUH
LQVWDOOHGLQMXVWSHUFHQWPDLQO\IRUSURFHVVLQJDEUDVLYHPDWHULDO:KLOHEDOOPLOOVVWLOO
DFFRXQWIRUSHUFHQWRILQVWDOOHGPLOOVIRUFOLQNHUJULQGLQJWKHLUPDUNHWVKDUHRIQHZ
PLOOVKDVGHFUHDVHGLQUHFHQW\HDUVIURPWRSHUFHQWZKLOHWKHUROOHUPLOOPDUNHW
VKDUHKDVLQFUHDVHGWRSHUFHQW
,Q VRPH SODQWV KLJKSUHVVXUH JULQGLQJ UROOV +3*5 VHH &KDSWHU DUH LQVWDOOHG
DKHDGRIEDOOPLOOVWRGHFUHDVHHQHUJ\SHUWRQQHE\SURGXFLQJDODUJHDPRXQWRIÀQHV
,QRWKHUSODQWVYHUWLFDOUROOHUPLOOVDUHXVHGWRPDNHÀQLVKHGFHPHQW(QHUJ\XVHLQ
HDFKFLUFXLWLV
• EDOO PLOOV ² N:KW
• +3*5 SOXV EDOO PLOO ² ² N:KW
• YHUWLFDO UROOHU PLOOV ² ² N:KW
%DOO PLOOV KDYH DGYDQWDJHV IRU JULQGLQJ FHPHQW FOLQNHU 7KH\ JHQHUDWH KHDW WR SDUWLDOO\
GHK\GUDWH J\SVXP WKHLU FDSLWDO FRVW LV ORZHU WKDQ IRU UROOHU PLOOV WKHLU DYDLODELOLW\ LV
KLJK DQG WKH\ DUH HDV\ WR RSHUDWH
&ODVVLÀHUV DUH LPSRUWDQW LQ WKH SHUIRUPDQFH RI FOLQNHU JULQGLQJ FLUFXLWV DQG RQH
PHWKRG RI LPSURYLQJ SURGXFWLYLW\ DW ORZ FRVW LV WR UHSODFH ROGHU FODVVLÀHUV ZLWK PRGHUQ
KLJKHIÀFLHQF\ XQLWV &ODVVLÀHUV DUH GLVFXVVHG LQ &KDSWHU
:KHQ ODUJHU PLOOV ZHUH EXLOW LQ WKH V WR JULQG PRUH FOLQNHU WKH VL]HV RI WKH PRWRU
DQG SRZHU WUDQVPLVVLRQ V\VWHPV DOVR LQFUHDVHG UHVXOWLQJ LQ PDLQWHQDQFH SUREOHPV
ZLWK WKH SRZHU WUDQVPLVVLRQ V\VWHPV 7KHVH OHG WR WKH GHYHORSPHQW RI JHDUOHVV
PLOO GULYHV LQ ZKLFK WKH PRWRU URWRU HOHPHQWV DUH DWWDFKHG WR WKH PLOO VKHOO DQG DUH
VXUURXQGHG E\ D VWDWLRQDU\ VWDWRU DVVHPEO\ (OHFWURQLFV FRQYHUW WKH LQFRPLQJ FXUUHQW
IURP +] WR DERXW +] DQG WKH PLOO VKHOO EHFRPHV WKH URWDWLQJ HOHPHQW RI D ODUJH
ORZVSHHG V\QFKURQRXV PRWRU 7KH ÀUVW JHDUOHVV GULYH ZDV LQVWDOOHG RQ D FHPHQW PLOO
DW /H +DYUH LQ DQG PDQ\ ZHUH LQVWDOOHG LQ WKH IROORZLQJ \HDUV *HDUOHVV PLOO
GULYH WHFKQRORJ\ ZDV ZHOO GHYHORSHG E\ WKH WLPH WKDW LW ZDV WUDQVIHUUHG WR ODUJH RUH
PLOOV DURXQG
7KH ÁRZV RI KRW DLU DQG FRDO WKURXJK WKH PLOO DUH VKRZQ LQ )LJXUH ,Q &KLQD PRUH
WKDQ SXOYHULVHUV DUH XVHG LQ SRZHU SODQWV ZLWK SHU FHQW RI WKHVH YHUWLFDO UROOHU
PLOOV ,Q EDOOWXEH PLOOV DQG YHUWLFDO UROOHU PLOOV ZHUH LQVWDOOHG LQ QHZ SRZHU
SODQWV LQ &KLQD
FIG 5.5 – Double-ended ball/tube mill for grinding coal (image courtesy Foster Wheeler Global Power Group).
%HIRUH WKH V KLJK SODQW FDSDFLWLHV ZHUH DFKLHYHG E\ RSHUDWLQJ PXOWLSOH EDOO PLOO
FODVVLÀHU FLUFXLWV LQ SDUDOOHO 7\SLFDOO\ WKH IHHG IRU VXFK EDOO PLOOV LV SUHSDUHG E\ ÀQH
FUXVKLQJ RU URG PLOOLQJ $ ÀQH FUXVKHG IHHG LV IHG E\ FRQYH\RU GLUHFWO\ LQWR WKH EDOO PLOO
IHHG ,I WKH EDOO PLOO LV DIWHU D URG PLOO WKH IHHG ZLOO FRQWDLQ D ODUJH DPRXQW RI ÀQHV DQG
ZLOO DOUHDG\ EH LQ D VOXUU\ ,Q WKLV LQVWDQFH WKH IHHG LV ÀUVW VHQW WR D FODVVLÀHU DQG RQO\ WKH
FRDUVH IUDFWLRQ LV VHQW WR WKH EDOO PLOO &LUFXLWV RI WKLV W\SH DUH VWLOO XVHG EXW QRZ XVXDOO\
UHFHLYH IHHG IURP D VHPLDXWRJHQRXV JULQGLQJ 6$* RU DXWRJHQRXV JULQGLQJ $* PLOO
7DEOH JLYHV WKH GDWD IURP D FLUFXLW LQ ZKLFK RUH ZLWK D %RQG %DOO 0LOO :RUN ,QGH[
%%0:L RI N:KW LV JURXQG LQ D P ð P EDOO PLOO LQ D FORVHG FLUFXLW ZLWK IRXU
PP F\FORQHV $ GLDJUDP RI WKH FLUFXLW LV VKRZQ LQ )LJXUH
7KH HUD RI YHU\ ODUJH EDOO PLOOV VWDUWHG LQ WKH V EHFDXVH QHZ HOHFWULFDO DQG
PHFKDQLFDO HQJLQHHULQJ WHFKQLTXHV PDGH WKHP SRVVLEOH $Q LPSRUWDQW XVH IRU WKHVH
ODUJH PLOOV LV UHJULQGLQJ 6$* PLOO SURGXFW WR HQVXUH DGHTXDWH PLQHUDO OLEHUDWLRQ
7KH ODUJHVW EDOO PLOOV FXUUHQWO\ LQ XVH DUH P LQ GLDPHWHU E\ P ORQJ DQG UHTXLUH
0: RI LQVWDOOHG SRZHU UHIHU WR 7DEOH
TABLE 5.6
Typical stream sizings in a ball mill/cyclone circuit.
Size (mm) Circuit feed Ball mill discharge Cyclone underflow Cyclone overflow
2.36 98.8 98.6 98.5 100
1.18 78.6 96.3 91.5 100
0.60 52.3 90.9 82.2 100
0.30 38.6 76.6 65.3 98.9
0.15 29.9 47.3 35.8 91.3
0.075 23.9 25.4 16.3 72.2
0.038 19.2 16.3 9.9 53.8
Tonnes per hour 110 592 592 110
Solids (%) 95.6 69.4 72.9 34.3
FIG 5.6 – Diagram of the circuit used to gather the data in Table 5.6 (image courtesy Hakan Dundar).
TABLE 5.7
Sizes and motor powers of large ball mills.
Metso Polysius Outotec FLSmidth CITIC
Diameter (m) 7.9 7.3 8.5 8.2 7.9
Length (m) 12.5 12.5 13.4 13.1 13.6
Installed power (MW) 15.0 13.3 22.0 18.6 17.0
$V EDOO PLOOV EHFDPH ODUJHU WKH VL]H RI WKH GULYH V\VWHPV DOVR LQFUHDVHG DQG WKH
VHOHFWLRQ RI D GULYH V\VWHP EHFDPH D FUXFLDO IDFWRU LQ WKH GHVLJQ RI D FLUFXLW 7KH OLPLW RI
SRZHU WUDQVPLVVLRQ WKURXJK JHDUV LV FXUUHQWO\ N: SHU SLQLRQ DQG N: IRU D
GXDOSLQLRQ PLOO 7KH DOWHUQDWLYH WR JHDUV LV D ZUDSDURXQG PRWRU RI WKH W\SH GLVFXVVHG
IRU ODUJH FOLQNHU JULQGLQJ PLOOV 7KHUH LV DQ RYHUODS ]RQH RI ² 0: ZKHUH JHDUHG
DQG JHDUOHVV GULYHV FDQ EH XVHG EXW IRU PRUH WKDQ 0: RQO\ WKH JHDUOHVV GULYH KDV
EHHQ XVHG $V HQJLQHHULQJ DQG PDQXIDFWXULQJ LPSURYH JHDUHG GULYHV ZLOO EH DEOH WR
EH XVHG DW KLJKHU SRZHU OHYHOV &XUUHQW HQJLQHHULQJ GHVLJQV DUH ORRNLQJ DW JHDUHG PLOOV
DSSURDFKLQJ 0:
Ball charge
6WHHO EDOOV DUH H[WUHPHO\ HIIHFWLYH JULQGLQJ PHGLD IRU EUHDNLQJ KDUG RUHV LQ 6$* PLOOV
EHFDXVH WKH\ FDQ JHQHUDWH YHU\ KLJK NLQHWLF HQHUJLHV IRU LPSDFW EUHDNDJH 7KXV WKH
LQWURGXFWLRQ RI VWHHO EDOOV UHVXOWV LQ HQKDQFHG EUHDNDJH DQG WKH LPSDFW EUHDNDJH WKDW
RFFXUV HQDEOHV D PRUH UDSLG EUHDNGRZQ RI FRDUVHU URFNV WKDQ WKH VORZHU DWWULWLRQ DQG
DEUDVLRQ EUHDNDJH PHFKDQLVP $Q LQFUHDVHG EDOO FKDUJH DOVR UHGXFHV WKH DPRXQW RI
LQWHUPHGLDWHVL]HG URFNV W\SLFDOO\ LQ WKH ² PP UDQJH $V D JHQHUDO UXOH JULQGLQJ RI
ÀQHU SDUWLFOHV LV IDYRXUHG E\ WKH XVH RI VPDOOHU PHGLD KHQFH WKH UHPRYDO RI ² PP
URFN SDUWLFOHV ZLOO UHGXFH WKH DELOLW\ RI D PLOO WR JULQG ÀQHU SDUWLFOHV 7KLV HIIHFW RQ WKH
SURGXFW VL]H GLVWULEXWLRQ FDQ EH UHGXFHG E\ LQFUHDVLQJ WKH EDOO FKDUJH YROXPH WR KLJK
OHYHOV W\SLFDOO\ ! SHU FHQW E\ YROXPH :KHQ WUHDWLQJ VRIW RUHV ZLWK D YHU\ ÀQH IHHG
VL]H GLVWULEXWLRQ 6$* PLOOV RSHUDWH PRUH OLNH D ODUJH EDOO PLOO ZKHUH PRVW RI WKH URFN
SDUWLFOHV DUH RU UDSLGO\ EUHDN LQWR D PXFK VPDOOHU VL]H WKDQ WKH VWHHO EDOOV 7KHUH LV YHU\
OLWWOH URFN WKDW LV KDUG DQG ODUJH HQRXJK WR DFW DV JULQGLQJ PHGLD 7KHUHIRUH KLJK EDOO
FKDUJH YROXPH LV UHTXLUHG WR SURYLGH D VXIÀFLHQW VWHHOJULQGLQJ PHGLD VXUIDFH DUHD DQG
XQXVXDOO\ KLJK OHYHOV DUH XVHG LQ VRPH FLUFXPVWDQFHV WR SHU FHQW E\ YROXPH
/LQHU SURÀOHV PXVW EH DGMXVWHG WR EH OHVV DJJUHVVLYH DQG PRUH VLPLODU WR D EDOO PLOO
WR DYRLG OLQHU GDPDJH 7R D ODUJH H[WHQW WKH FKRLFH RI EDOO VL]H ZLOO EH GLFWDWHG E\ WKH
KDUGQHVV RI WKH RUH DQG LWV IHHG VL]H GLVWULEXWLRQ 6RIWHU DQGRU ÀQHU RUH ZLOO UHTXLUH
VPDOOHU EDOOV ZKLOH KDUGHUFRDUVHU RUH ZLOO UHTXLUH ODUJHU EDOOV
Ball size
/DUJHU GLDPHWHU EDOOV SURGXFH JUHDWHU NLQHWLF HQHUJ\ SHU LPSDFW PHDQLQJ WKDW WKH\
FDQ EUHDN ODUJHU DQG KDUGHU URFNV PRUH HIIHFWLYHO\ KRZHYHU WKHUH DUH IHZHU EDOOV
SHU XQLW YROXPH DQG WKXV OHVV IUHTXHQW EUHDNDJH LPSDFWV WKDQ IRU VPDOOHU GLDPHWHU
EDOOV 3DUWLFXODUO\ IRU KDUG RUHV WKH EUHDNDJH UDWH RI ODUJH SDUWLFOHV LV LQFUHDVHG E\
XVLQJ ODUJHU GLDPHWHU EDOOV GXH WR WKH DGGLWLRQDO NLQHWLF HQHUJ\ $V WKH SDUWLFOH VL]H
GHFUHDVHV WKH HIIHFW RI LQFUHDVHG NLQHWLF HQHUJ\ WKDW ODUJHU EDOOV SURYLGH EHFRPHV
OHVV SURQRXQFHG DQG LV RYHUVKDGRZHG E\ WKH UHGXFWLRQ LQ EDOO QXPEHUV 7KLV LV
SDUWLFXODUO\ QRWLFHDEOH LQ WKH LQWHUPHGLDWH RU FULWLFDO VL]H UDQJH RI ² PP ZKHUH
D ODUJHU QXPEHU RI VPDOOHU EDOOV FDQ UHVXOW LQ KLJKHU EUHDNDJH UDWHV GXH WR WKH KLJKHU
IUHTXHQF\ RI LPSDFWV :KHQ WUHDWLQJ VRIW RUHV ZLWK YHU\ ÀQH IHHG VL]H WKDW LV ZKHQ
RSHUDWLQJ OLNH D ODUJH EDOO PLOO VPDOOHU EDOOV DQG D ODUJH VXUIDFH DUHD DUH PRUH HIIHFWLYH
GXH WR WKH LQFUHDVHG IUHTXHQF\ RI LPSDFWV DQG JUHDWHU VXUIDFH DUHD ZKLFK SURPRWHV
DWWULWLRQ DQG DEUDVLRQ EUHDNDJH PHFKDQLVPV
FIG 5.7 – A semi-autogenous grinding (SAG) mill (left; image courtesy FLSmidth) and
a typical SAG mill/ball mill circuit (right; image courtesy Hakan Dundar).
7KH SURGXFW VL]H IURP $* PLOOV WHQGV WR EH ÀQHU WKDQ IURP 6$* PLOOV GXH WR OHVV LPSDFW
DQG PRUH DEUDVLRQ EUHDNDJH EXW ERWK PLOOV DUH XVXDOO\ IROORZHG E\ D EDOO PLOO WR SURGXFH
ÀQH ÁRWDWLRQ IHHG 6$* PLOOV ZLWK EDOOV ÀOOLQJ DV PXFK DV SHU FHQW RI PLOO YROXPH DUH
WKH SUHIHUUHG PDFKLQHV IRU KLJKFDSDFLW\ FLUFXLWV WKDW FDUU\ RXW ÀQH FUXVKLQJ DQG FRDUVH
JULQGLQJ 6RPH VL]H GLVWULEXWLRQV DURXQG D W\SLFDO FLUFXLW FRQWDLQLQJ D 6$* PLOO EDOO
PLOO DQG K\GURF\FORQHV DUH VKRZQ LQ )LJXUH
100
90
80
70
60
ƉĂƐƐŝŶŐй
50 Fresh
Feed
40
SAG
30 Product
Trommel
20 U/S
10 Cyclone
O/F
0
0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000
Ɖ͘ƐŝnjĞ;ŵŵͿ
FIG 5.8 – Typical size distributions in a semi-autogenous grinding (SAG) mill / ball mill circuit. Trommel undersize
(U/S) is the SAG mill product after pebbles are removed. Cyclone O/F – overflow (image courtesy Hakan Dundar).
7KH FKRLFH RI DQ $* RU 6$* PLOO GHSHQGV RQ WKH SURSHUWLHV RI WKH RUH LQ SDUWLFXODU
LWV FRPSHWHQFH ZKLFK LV QRW WKH VDPH DV RUH KDUGQHVV 2UH FRPSHWHQFH LV D PHDVXUH
RI WKH UHVLVWDQFH RI SDUWLFOHV UDQJLQJ EHWZHHQ ² PP WR EUHDNDJH DQG LV UHOHYDQW
WR DXWRJHQRXV JULQGLQJ 2UH KDUGQHVV LV D PHDVXUH RI WKH UHVLVWDQFH RI SDUWLFOHV ÀQHU
WKDQ PP WR EUHDNDJH DQG LV UHOHYDQW WR EDOO PLOOLQJ $Q $* PLOO UHTXLUHV FRPSHWHQW
RUH WR SURYLGH WKH PHGLD LQ WKH PLOO ,I WKHUH LV LQVXIÀFLHQW FRPSHWHQW RUH LQ WKH PLOO
IHHG RU WKH FRPSHWHQFH LV KLJKO\ YDULDEOH 6$* PLOOLQJ PXVW EH XVHG WR HQVXUH WKDW
VXIÀFLHQW JULQGLQJ PHGLD DUH SUHVHQW 6HOHFWLQJ 6$* PLOOLQJ UHVXOWV LQ H[WUD H[SHQVH IRU
VWHHO EDOOV DQG LQFUHDVHG OLQHU ZHDU KRZHYHU EHFDXVH WKH HQHUJ\ LQWHQVLW\ LV KLJK IRU
6$* PLOOLQJ LW LV XVXDOO\ SRVVLEOH WR UHGXFH FDSLWDO FRVW E\ LQVWDOOLQJ D VPDOOHU PLOO RU
IHZHU PLOOV &ULWLFDO VL]H SDUWLFOHV PD\ EXLOG XS ZLWK HLWKHU $* RU 6$* PLOOLQJ EXW WKH\
FDQ EH PDQDJHG E\ LQVWDOOLQJ SRUWV LQ WKH GLVFKDUJH JUDWH WKURXJK ZKLFK WKH SHEEOHV DUH
UHPRYHG DQG VXEVHTXHQWO\ FUXVKHG
&KRRVLQJ JHDUHG RU JHDUOHVV GULYH V\VWHPV LQ ODUJH $* DQG 6$* PLOOV LV RI SULPH
LPSRUWDQFH 7KH DGYDQWDJHV RI JHDUHG GULYHV DUH ORZHU FDSLWDO FRVW HDVH RI LQVWDOODWLRQ
DQG OHVV PDLQWHQDQFH 7KH SUDFWLFDO OLPLW RI PLOO VL]H IRU D JHDUHG GULYH LV FXUUHQWO\
P IHHW $OO PRGHUQ 6$* PLOOV DUH YDULDEOH VSHHG GULYH DQG JHDUHG GULYHV QHHG
WR KDYH WKLV IHDWXUH LQFOXGHG DV D VHSDUDWH LWHP WR WKH PRWRU *HDUOHVV GULYHV KDYH ORZHU
RSHUDWLQJ FRVWV DQG VSHHG FDQ LQKHUHQWO\ YDU\ IURP ]HUR WR SHU FHQW 9DULDEOH VSHHG
UHGXFHV OLQHU GDPDJH E\ VORZLQJ WKH PLOO ZKHQ RUH FRPSHWHQFH IDOOV DQG DOORZV WKH PLOO
WR EH VSHG XS IRU KLJKFRPSHWHQFH RUHV DQG WR PDLQWDLQ WKURXJKSXW DV OLIWHUV ZHDU
/DUJH 6$* DQG EDOO PLOOV DUH RFFDVLRQDOO\ PRGLÀHG WR KDQGOH VSHFLÀF SUREOHPV
([DPSOHV IURP 2XWRWHF LQFOXGH WKH GHVLJQ DQG PDQXIDFWXUH RI DFLGUHVLVWDQW PLOOV IRU
XVH ZKHQ JULQGLQJ LV FDUULHG RXW LQ UHWXUQ OLTXRU IURP DQ DFLG OHDFK6;(: VROYHQW
H[WUDFWLRQ DQG HOHFWURZLQQLQJ SURFHVV DQG RI SXOS OLIWHUV WR LPSURYH WKH GLVFKDUJH RI
VOXUU\ IURP KLJKYROXPH 6$* PLOOV 7KH ODUJHVW 6$* PLOOV RIIHUHG E\ WKH PDMRU YHQGRUV
DUH VKRZQ LQ 7DEOH
TABLE 5.8
Sizes and motor powers of large autogenous and semi-autogenous grinding mills.
Metso Polysius Outotec FLSmidth CITIC
Maximum diameter (m) 12.8 13.4 12.2 12.2 12.2
Maximum length (m) 7.6 6.8 8.8 7.9 11.0
Maximum power (MW) 28.0 25.4 28.0 22.0 28.0
)XOOHU7UD\ORU 6$*$* PLOOV UDQJH LQ VL]H IURP WR P WR IHHW LQ GLDPHWHU
DQG KDYH SRZHUV DV KLJK DV 0: KS 7KH\ IHDWXUH K\GURVWDWLF OXEULFDWLRQ
DQG FDQ DFFRPPRGDWH HLWKHU D JHDUHG RU JHDUOHVV GULYH DUUDQJHPHQW DUH W\SLFDOO\ JUDWH
GLVFKDUJH DQG XVH PHWDO OLQHUV
ROD MILLS
5RG PLOOV DUH VLPLODU WR EDOO PLOOV H[FHSW WKDW WKH JULQGLQJ PHGLD DUH IUHHPRYLQJ VWHHO
URGV WKDW H[WHQG WKH OHQJWK RI WKH PLOO &RQVHTXHQWO\ PLOO OHQJWK VKRXOG EH DW OHDVW
SHU FHQW PRUH WKDQ PLOO GLDPHWHU WR DYRLG GDQJHURXV URG WDQJOLQJ 5RG PLOOV DUH
RSHUDWHG DW D VORZHU VSHHG WKDQ EDOO PLOOV DQG WKH SURGXFW FRQWDLQV IHZHU ÀQHV 7KH IHHG
LV W\SLFDOO\ ² PP DQG UHGXFWLRQ WR ² PP LV FRPPRQ IRU RSHQFLUFXLW PLOOV
5RGV DQG EDOOV LQ SODFH ZHLJK DQG NJP UHVSHFWLYHO\ PHDQLQJ WKDW WKHUH
DUH OHVV YRLGV LQ WKH URWDWLQJ PDVV RI URGV WKDQ LQ WKH URWDWLQJ PDVV RI EDOOV 5RG PLOOV
DUH PRUH VHQVLWLYH WKDQ EDOO PLOOV WR H[FHVVLYH KDUG DQG FRDUVH IHHG SDUWLFOHV DQG WKHLU
WHQGHQF\ WR UHMHFW WKHVH IURP WKH URWDWLQJ PDVV OLPLWV WKH IHHG UDWH 3URYLGHG WKHUH LV
QRW H[FHVVLYH FRDUVH PDWHULDO LQ WKH IHHG URG PLOOV FUXVK WKH FRDUVHU VL]HV SUHIHUHQWLDOO\
DQG SURGXFH FRQVLGHUDEO\ OHVV ÀQHV WKDQ EDOO PLOOV IRU WKH VDPH QRPLQDO JULQGLQJ GXW\
7DEOH VKRZV WKH HOLPLQDWLRQ RI FRDUVHU SDUWLFOHV E\ WKH URG PLOO UHODWLYH WR WKH EDOO
PLOO 5RG PLOOV FDQ EH XVHG ZHW RU GU\ DV WUXQQLRQ GLVFKDUJH RU SHULSKHUDO FHQWUH RU
HQG GLVFKDUJH PLOOV 0LOO VL]HV UDUHO\ H[FHHG P LQ GLDPHWHU ð P ORQJ EHFDXVH
PP GLDPHWHU URGV DUH WKH ODUJHVW VL]H XVXDOO\ DGGHG WR WKH PLOO DQG P LV WKHLU
PD[LPXP OHQJWK IRU VWUXFWXUDO UHDVRQV 7\SLFDOO\ URGV DUH DYDLODEOH LQ GLDPHWHUV XS WR
PP EXW VRPH PP GLDPHWHU URGV DUH DYDLODEOH
5RG PLOOV ZHUH XVHG IRU PDQ\ \HDUV DV WHUWLDU\ FUXVKHUV EXW DUH QRW QRZ XVHG LQ ODUJH
FDSDFLW\ SODQWV WKDW LV PRUH WKDQ WK 6HFRQGDU\ DQG WHUWLDU\ FUXVKHUV LQ VXFK
SODQWV DUH EHLQJ UHSODFHG E\ 6$* PLOOV WR VLPSOLI\ WKH FLUFXLWV DQG RQO\ VPDOO ÁRZV RI
FRDUVH SDUWLFOHV LQ WKH 6$* PLOO GLVFKDUJH UHTXLUH IXUWKHU FUXVKLQJ KRZHYHU URG PLOOV
DUH VWLOO XVHG LQ VPDOOHU SODQWV XS WR WK 7KH\ KDYH EHHQ JLYHQ D QHZ OHDVH RI OLIH
E\ WKH XVH RI FRDO DQG SHWUROHXP FRNH VOXUULHV IRU LQWHJUDWHG JDVLÀFDWLRQ FRPELQHG F\FOH
,*&& HOHFWULF SRZHU JHQHUDWLRQ DQG FRJHQHUDWLRQ IDFLOLWLHV %HFDXVH WKH RSHQFLUFXLW
URG PLOO SURGXFW FRQWDLQV IHZHU ÀQHV WKDQ D EDOO PLOO SURGXFW LW PDNHV D VOXUU\ WKDW KDV
D KLJK SHUFHQWDJH RI VROLGV DQG ORZ YLVFRVLW\ ZKLFK FDQ EH SXPSHG GLUHFWO\ LQWR WKH
TABLE 5.9
Comparison of rod and ball mill feed and product sizings (WI – Work Index).
Rod mill (2.7 m × 4.1 m, 110 t/h WI-14.6) Ball mill (3.2 m × 4.3 m, 155 t/h WI-9.5)
Size (mm) Feed % passing Product % passing Feed % passing Product % passing
19 100 100 100 100
9.5 64 100 86.1 100
4.75 39.2 100 68.5 99.8
2.35 24.1 100 54.2 99.1
1.18 14.4 98.8 40.7 96
0.60 7.7 52.3 27.7 86.3
0.30 3.2 38.6 16.4 68.3
0.15 1.8 29.9 9.3 49.7
0.075 1.3 23.8 5.8 36.5
JDVLÀFDWLRQ UHDFWRU 5RG PLOOV DUH SUHIHUUHG IRU EULWWOH PLQHUDOV VXFK DV VFKHHOLWH DQG
JUDSKLWH WR PLQLPLVH RYHUJULQGLQJ DQG PD[LPLVH ÁRWDWLRQ UHFRYHULHV
FIG 5.9 – Rotary breaker 3.6 m diameter × 8.2 m long prior to installation of
dust cover guard (image courtesy McLanahan Corporation).
WKURXJK WKH VFUHHQ RSHQLQJV WR D FROOHFWLRQ KRSSHU EHORZ +DUG URFN DQG XQFUXVKDEOH
PDWHULDOV DUH GLVFKDUJHG RXW WKH HQG RI WKH F\OLQGHU ZLWK WKH DLG RI D GLVFKDUJH SORZ
7KH EURNHQ FRDO LV W\SLFDOO\ VFUHHQHG DW PP IROORZLQJ WKH URWDU\ EUHDNHU WKH FRDUVH
FRDO LV SXPSHG WR GHQVH PHGLXP VHSDUDWLRQ F\FORQHV DQG WKH ÀQH FRDO LV FOHDQHG E\
ÁRWDWLRQ 7DEOH SUHVHQWV GHWDLOV RI WKH FDSDFLW\ RI %UDGIRUG EUHDNHUV
TABLE 5.10
Capacities of Bradford breakers (McLanahan Corporation).
Breaker Aperture size (mm) and throughput (Mt/h)
Dia × L (m) 38 mm 50 mm 63 mm 76 mm 89 mm 102 mm 127 mm 152 mm 203 mm
2.74 × 5.49 303 409 512 529 544 560 622 699 934
3.35 × 6.40 439 593 744 766 788 811 901 1012 1353
3.66 × 8.23 676 913 1145 1180 1214 1249 1388 1560 2082
SCRUBBERS
7ZR URWDU\ VFUXEEHUV DUH VKRZQ LQ )LJXUH 6FUXEEHUV DUH KLJKFDSDFLW\ PDFKLQHV
WKDW DUH SULPDULO\ XVHG WR UHPRYH ZDWHUGLVSHUVLEOH FOD\V GHOHWHULRXV PDWHULDOV DQG
FRDWLQJV IURP D ZLGH YDULHW\ RI KDUG URFN DQG RUH 7KH\ DUH F\OLQGULFDO GUXPV ZLWK
LQWHUQDO OLIWHUV DQG DUH W\SLFDOO\ VXSSRUWHG E\ WUXQQLRQ UROOHUV VKHOO UROOHUV RU WUXQQLRQ
EHDULQJV DW HLWKHU HQG RU E\ D VHULHV RI SQHXPDWLF W\UHV DORQJ WKH VFUXEEHU OHQJWK 7KH
FRQWLQXRXV OLIWLQJ DQG GURSSLQJ DFWLRQ ZLWK ZDWHU KHOSV DEUDGH VFUXE DQG EUHDN GRZQ
GLVSHUVLEOH RUH FRPSRQHQWV 6FUXEEHUV FRQVLVW RI D VROLG VKHOO VHFWLRQ DQG FDQ EH IROORZHG
E\ DQ RSWLRQDO WURPPHO VFUHHQ VHFWLRQ ,Q WKH VROLG VKHOO VHFWLRQ WKH HQHUJ\ LV LPSDUWHG
WR WKH IHHG LQ ZKDW FDQ EH FRQVLGHUHG D ZDVKLQJ DQG DEUDGLQJ DFWLRQ 'LVFKDUJH GDP
ULQJV FDQ EH FKDQJHG WR LQFUHDVH RU GHFUHDVH F\OLQGHU UHWHQWLRQ WLPH DQG WKH DPRXQW RI
HQHUJ\ LPSDUWHG 7KH WURPPHO VFUHHQ LV VXLWHG WR JHQHUDWLQJ D GHZDWHUHG FRDUVH SURGXFW
RU D SDUWLDOO\ GHZDWHUHG ÀQHU SURGXFW ZKLFK FDQ EH WUDQVIHUUHG WR D YLEUDWLQJ VFUHHQ
IRU ÀQDO VL]LQJ 7KH WURPPHO VFUHHQ VHFWLRQ LV DQ LQWHJUDO SDUW RI WKH VFUXEEHU EHFDXVH
LWV VFUHHQLQJ DQG GHZDWHULQJ FDSDELOLWLHV DUH SURYLGHG WKURXJK LWV FRQWLQXRXV URWDWLRQ
ZLWK WKH VFUXEEHU 7KH WURPPHO VFUHHQ FDQ EH HDVLO\ EDFNZDVKHG DW WKH WRS RI LWV WUDYHO
6FUXEEHUV W\SLFDOO\ RSHUDWH DW ORZ VSHHGV DQG UHO\ RQ WKH RUH FRQWDLQLQJ HQRXJK ODUJH
PHGLD WR SURYLGH WKH QHFHVVDU\ ZDVKLQJ DQG HQHUJ\ LQSXW $ ODFN RI PHGLD FDQ UHVXOW
LQ FOD\ EDOO IRUPDWLRQ ZKLFK FDQ FDXVH SUREOHPV GRZQVWUHDP LQ WKH IRUP RI ORVVHV RU
FRQWDPLQDWLRQ ,I WKHUH LV LQVXIÀFLHQW PHGLD SUHVHQW LQ WKH IHHG D VPDOO TXDQWLW\ RI VWHHO
EDOOV PD\ EH DGGHG SURYLGHG WKDW WKH VFUXEEHU VKHOO LV VXIÀFLHQWO\ VWURQJ $OWHUQDWLYHO\
EDUUHQKDUG ODUJH URFN PD\ EH DGGHG LI DYDLODEOH WR SURYLGH VFUXEELQJ PHGLD 6FUXEEHUV
UDUHO\ KDYH SRZHU LQSXW OHYHOV DERYH DSSUR[LPDWHO\ 0: $W WKLV VL]H D VFUXEEHU FDQ
EHJLQ WR ORRN OLNH D EDOO PLOO ZLWK D SLQLRQ GULYH DQG VKHOOPRXQWHG EHDULQJV
GRINDING BALLS
7KH JULQGLQJ EDOOV XVHG LQ YDULRXV W\SHV RI FRPPLQXWLRQ PDFKLQHV KDYH D ZLGH UDQJH
RI VL]HV DQG FRPSRVLWLRQV FDOFXODWHG E\ WKH HTXLSPHQW YHQGRU $FURVV DOO WKH PDFKLQHV
WKH EDOOV· EUHDNDJH PHFKDQLVPV DUH LPSDFW DEUDVLRQ DQG DWWULWLRQ 7KH ZHLJKW RI D EDOO
FKDUJH LV LPSRUWDQW EXW LW LV DOVR QHFHVVDU\ WR KDYH WKH FRUUHFW VL]H GLVWULEXWLRQ RI EDOOV LI
WKH PRVW HIÀFLHQW XVH RI JULQGLQJ HQHUJ\ LV WR EH DFKLHYHG ,Q WKLV FRQWH[W LW LV QRWHG WKDW
W RI VWHHO EDOOV FRQWDLQV § EDOOV RI PP GLDPHWHU § EDOOV RI PP GLDPHWHU
RU § PLOOLRQ EDOOV RI PP GLDPHWHU *ULQGLQJ FDXVHV WKH EDOOV WR ZHDU DQG QHZ EDOOV
PXVW EH DGGHG UHJXODUO\ WR PDLQWDLQ WKH FKDUJH OHYHO DQG SRZHU GUDZ LQ D WXPEOLQJ
PLOO 7KH SUHIHUHQFH LV IRU WKH WRS VL]H RI EDOOV LQ D EDOO FKDUJH WR EH ODUJH HQRXJK WR
EUHDN WKH WRS VL]H RI SDUWLFOHV LQ WKH IHHG H[FHSW LQ UHJDUG WR 6$* PLOOLQJ %DOOV LQ WKH
FKDUJH ZLOO DVVXPH D VL]H GLVWULEXWLRQ RYHU D SHULRG RI WLPH DV WKH\ ZHDU DQG UHDFK D
VL]H ZKHUH WKH\ DUH HLWKHU EURNHQ GRZQ TXLFNO\ RU GLVFKDUJHG IURP WKH PLOO DV D ¶VFDW·
:KLOH D FRDUVH IHHG FDQ EH UHGXFHG WR D ÀQH SURGXFW LQ D VLQJOH PLOOFODVVLÀHU FLUFXLW
WKH DOWHUQDWLYH SURFHGXUH RI XVLQJ WZR PLOOFODVVLÀHU FLUFXLWV LQ D VHULHV ZLWK ODUJH EDOOV
DGGHG WR WKH ÀUVW PLOO DQG VPDOO EDOOV WR WKH VHFRQG PLOO LV XVXDOO\ PRUH HIÀFLHQW DQG
SUHIHUDEOH
)UHVK LURQ SDUWLFOHV FRPLQJ IURP WKH DEUDVLRQ RI EDOOV DQG PLOO OLQHUV FDQ DIIHFW
GRZQVWUHDP SURFHVVHV VXFK DV ÁRWDWLRQ E\ SURGXFLQJ D UHGXFLQJ VOXUU\ KRZHYHU
SURJUHVV KDV EHHQ PDGH LQ GHYHORSLQJ PDWHULDOV WR PLQLPLVH ZHDU IRU H[DPSOH
• %DOOV PDGH IRU XVH LQ FHPHQW PLOOV KDYH FKURPLXP FRQWHQWV IURP WHQ WR SHU FHQW
DQG GLDPHWHUV IURP WR PP 7KH ODUJHU EDOOV DUH DGGHG WR WKH ÀUVW FRPSDUWPHQW
• )RU ZHW JULQGLQJ PLOOV WKH UDQJH RI FKURPLXP FRQWHQWV LV WHQ WR SHU FHQW %DOOV
ZLWK WKH KLJKHU OLPLW DUH XVHG ZKHQ LW LV QHFHVVDU\ WR PLQLPLVH WKH FRQWDPLQDWLRQ RI
ÁRWDWLRQ SXOSV ZLWK LURQ FRPSRXQGV
• $ ORZ FKURPLXP SURGXFW SHU FHQW &U LV DYDLODEOH LI UHTXLUHG
• .HUDPD[® DUH FHUDPLF EHDGV ² PP LQ GLDPHWHU DQG DUH XVHG LQ VWLUUHG PLOOV WR
SURGXFH YHU\ ÀQH SDUWLFOHV VXFK DV WKRVH UHTXLUHG IRU FDOFLXP FDUERQDWH LQ SDSHU
PDNLQJ DQG IRU WKH SKDUPDFHXWLFDO FRVPHWLF DQG PLQHUDO LQGXVWULHV
• +LJKFDUERQ FKURPLXPDOOR\HG VWHHO URGV DUH DYDLODEOH ZLWK GLDPHWHUV IURP
² PP DQG OHQJWKV IURP ² P
1. The examples given here are products of Magotteaux, a company located in Belgium with global affiliations.
Components of a mill
Mill heads
0LOO KHDGV DUH PDGH LQ VHJPHQWV HJ ð DQG WKHQ EROWHG 7KH PLOO KHDGV WUXQQLRQV
DQG JLUWK JHDUV FDQ EH PDGH IURP HLWKHU VWHHO RU VSKHURLGDO JUDSKLWH LURQ ZKLFK LV D
GXFWLOH LURQ ZLWK LPSDFW DQG IDWLJXH UHVLVWDQFH 0RVW RI WKH ODUJH VWHHO FDVWLQJ VKRSV
DURXQG WKH ZRUOG KDYH FORVHG GRZQ EHFDXVH WKH SULFHV RI VWHHO FDVWLQJV DUH PXFK KLJKHU
WKDQ VSKHURLGDO JUDSKLWH LURQ HYHQ WKRXJK WKH SURSHUWLHV RI VWHHO FDVWLQJV DUH EHWWHU
&,7,& FDVWLQJV IRU 6$*$* PLOOV XS WR P IHHW DUH VWHHO ZLWK FDVWLQJ DQG
FRROLQJ LQ VL[ SDUWV )RU P IHHW EDOO PLOO KHDGV WKH\ DUH SRXUHG LQ D VLQJOH
FDVWLQJ DQG WKHQ PDFKLQHG
7KH VKHOO LV D KROORZ F\OLQGHU WKDW QHHGV WR EH PDGH LQ SLHFHV DQG EROWHG DW WKH VLWH 7KH
GLPHQVLRQV OHQJWK ð ZLGWK ð KHLJKW GHWHUPLQH ZKDW FDQ EH WUDQVSRUWHG WR VLWH WR DYRLG
EULGJHV WXQQHOV HOHFWULF RYHUKHDG FDEOHV DQG WKH OLNH $Q\WKLQJ ELJJHU WKDQ P KDV WR
EH VHFWLRQDOLVHG IRU WUDQVSRUW 7UDQVSRUW UHVWULFWLRQV DQG WKH FDVWLQJ SRXULQJ FDSDFLW\ RI
WKH IRXQGU\ GHFLGH WKH QXPEHU RI VHFWLRQV LQ ZKLFK WKH PLOO KHDGV JHDU DQG VKHOO ZLOO
EH FDVW RU IDEULFDWHG (DFK RI WKH ODUJH JULQGLQJ PLOOV LV PDGH DQG GHVLJQHG HVSHFLDOO\
IRU HDFK ORFDWLRQ
Shells
7KH VKHOO ÁDQJHV DUH PDGH ZLWK FRQWRXUHG FDVWLQJ DQG WKHQ PDFKLQHG WR WKH FRUUHFW
SURÀOH 0LOO VKHOO SODWHV IRU $* PLOOV DUH UROOHG LQKRXVH DQG WKHQ ZHOGHG LQ DXWRPDWLF
*HUPDQ VXEDUF ULJV RQ IRXU P GLDPHWHU UROOHUV )RU EDOO PLOO VKHOO SODWHV WKLV LV GRQH
LQ RQH RI WHQ UROOHUV RI P GLDPHWHU
Trunnions
$V HYHU\ PLOO LV GLIIHUHQW WKH GHVLJQ RI HDFK FRPSRQHQW ZLOO GLIIHU $ VORW RU JURRYH LQ
WKH WUXQQLRQ HQVXUHV WKDW WKH WKUXVW EHDULQJV ÀW QHDWO\ RQWR WKH VLGHV JXDUDQWHHLQJ QR
ODWHUDO PRYHPHQW DV D JLUWK JHDU RU JHDUOHVV GULYH PXVW RSHUDWH RQ D À[HG FHQWUH
Gearless drive
$W SUHVHQW WKH JHDUOHVV GULYH LV PRUH FRVWO\ WKDQ WKH FRPSOHWH PHFKDQLFDO SRUWLRQ
PLOO URWDWLQJ HOHPHQW DQG DFFHVVRULHV VXSSOLHG E\ WKH PLOO PDQXIDFWXUHUV *HDUOHVV
GULYH URWDWLQJ HOHPHQWV DUH KHDYLHU WKDQ DQ HTXLYDOHQW JHDU GULYH JULQGLQJ PLOO WKH
FDVW KHDGV DUH KHDYLHU ZLWK D ORQJHU ÁDQJH WR KROG WKH VHJPHQWHG SROHV DQG WKH SROHV
DUH DSSUR[LPDWHO\ SHU FHQW KHDYLHU DQG QHHG WR EH LQGLYLGXDOO\ LQVWDOOHG DIWHU WKH
URWDWLQJ HOHPHQW LV SXW LQ SODFH RQ WKH IRXQGDWLRQ 7KH IRXQGDWLRQ DQG ORDG GDWD RQ
JHDUOHVV GULYHV DUH KLJKHU $LU JDS YDULDWLRQ EHWZHHQ WKH VKHOOURWRU DQG VWDWRU LV D
VRXUFH RI PDJQHWLF SXOO LPEDODQFH DQG WKH H[DFW UXQRXW LV QHHGHG WR UHGXFH WKH ULVN
RI XQEDODQFHG PDJQHWLF SXOOV DURXQG WKH FLUFXPIHUHQFH $IWHU PRXQWLQJ WKH SROHV WKH
WROHUDQFH UHTXLUHG WR PDLQWDLQ FRQFHQWULFLW\ LV OHVV WKDQ PP 7KH EROWV IRU PRXQWLQJ
WKH SROHV DUH VSHFLDOO\ PDGH VR WKDW WKH SROHV· FRQFHQWULFLW\ UXQRXW FDQ EH DGMXVWHG
ZLWKLQ PP $ JHDUOHVV GULYH KDV PXOWLSOH SROHV ZKLFK UHTXLUH DFFXUDWH DGMXVWPHQW
RI HDFK SROH WR PDLQWDLQ FRQFHQWULFLW\ ZLWKLQ WKH PRWRU VWDWRU 7KH FRPSOHWH URWDWLQJ
HOHPHQW EHFRPHV WKH URWRU RI WKH ODUJH PRWRU DQG WKH VWDWRU DQG URWRU DUH FDOOHG D
JHDUOHVV GULYH
'XULQJ DFWXDO RSHUDWLRQ WKH DLU JDS DW WKH WRS LQFUHDVHV DQG UHGXFHV DW WKH ERWWRP
WKXV FDXVLQJ DQ XQEDODQFHG PDJQHWLF SXOO )RU PLOOV DERYH P LQ GLDPHWHU RU RYHU
0: RI SRZHU WKHUH LV FXUUHQWO\ QR YLDEOH DOWHUQDWLYH WR D JHDUOHVV GULYH )RXU SLQLRQ
GULYHV DUH EHLQJ ORRNHG DW DQG DUH FXUUHQWO\ LQ WKH UHVHDUFK DQG GHYHORSPHQW VWDJH
)RU PLOOV P RU OHVV LQ GLDPHWHU DQG 0: RU XQGHU LQ SRZHU JHDUGULYHQ V\VWHPV
RIIHU D EHWWHU DOWHUQDWLYH WR JHDUOHVV GULYHV GHOLYHULQJ QHDUO\ HTXLYDOHQW HIÀFLHQF\ PXFK
ORZHU FDSLWDO FRVW ² SHU FHQW FKHDSHU HDVLHU LQVWDOODWLRQ VLPSOHU FRROLQJ VKRUWHU
LQVWDOODWLRQ WLPH DQG D TXLFNHU WZR WR WKUHH PRQWKV RYHUDOO SURMHFW VWDUWXS VFKHGXOH
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Allen, 7 Particle Size Measurement &KDSPDQ DQG +DOO /RQGRQ
Austin, / * /XFNLH 3 7 DQG .OLPSHO 5 5 The Process Engineering of Size Reduction: Ball
Milling S 6RFLHW\ IRU 0LQLQJ 0HWDOOXUJ\ DQG ([SORUDWLRQ DQG WKH $PHULFDQ ,QVWLWXWH RI
0LQLQJ 0HWDOOXUJLFDO DQG 3HWUROHXP (QJLQHHUV 1HZ <RUN
Beke, % The Process of Fine Grinding S $NDGHPLDL .LDGR %XGDSHVW
Bickle, : + HG Crushing and Grinding – A Bibliography S 'HSDUWPHQW IRU 6FLHQWLÀF
DQG ,QGXVWULDO 5HVHDUFK /RQGRQ
Bond, ) & 7KH WKLUG WKHRU\ RI FRPPLQXWLRQ Trans SME/AIME ²
Digre, 0 HG Proceedings Autogenous Grinding Seminar, YROXPHV DQG 7URQGKHLP 0D\
$VVRFLDWLRQ RI 1RUZHJLDQ 0LQHV 7URQGKHLP
Gross, - &UXVKLQJ DQG JULQGLQJ US Bureau of Mines Bulletin
Gy, 3 0 Sampling of Particulate Materials: Theory and Practice S (OVHYLHU $PVWHUGDP
Lowrison, * & Crushing and Grinding: The Size Reduction of Solid Materials S %XWWHUZRUWKV
/RQGRQ
Lynch, $ - Mineral Crushing and Grinding Circuits: Their Simulation, Optimisation, Design and
Control S (OVHYLHU $PVWHUGDP
Wills, % $ DQG 1DSLHU0XQQ 7 - Mineral Processing Technology VHYHQWK HGLWLRQ %XWWHUZRUWK
+HLQHPDQQ 2[IRUG
&DWDORJXHV IRU WXPEOLQJ PLOOV DUH DYDLODEOH RQ WKH LQWHUQHW IURP VHYHUDO FRPSDQLHV 7KRVH UHIHUUHG
WR LQ WKLV FKDSWHU LQFOXGH
• )/6PLGWK 'HQPDUN 86$
• 7K\VVHQ.UXSS *HUPDQ\
• 7HQRYD %DWHPDQ 6RXWK $IULFD
• 0HWVR )LQODQG
• &,7,& +HDY\ ,QGXVWULHV &KLQD
• 0F/DQDKDQ &RUSRUDWLRQ 86$
Chapter 6
COMPRESSION MACHINES
Alban Lynch
INTRODUCTION
Compression machines are used to break a wide range of different-sized solids, from
run-of-mine ore to micron particles 7he machines used as the feed becomes Àner
are – in order of particle size – the gyratory crusher, jaw crusher, cone crusher, high-
pressure grinding rolls (HPGRs) and vertical roller mills. The exact sequence of machines
is dependent on the task required, the material types and the necessary throughput.
PRIMARY CRUSHERS
Gyratory crusher
The gyratory crusher was patented in 1881 after years of failure with experimental
machines, and since that time there have been few fundamental changes to the original,
successful design. The crusher consists of a vertical cone suspended at the top and held
by a gyrating eccentric sleeve at the bottom. The eccentric assembly that causes the
gyration gives the crusher an open and closed side setting (OSS and CSS respectively),
and it is this movement that causes rocks to be trapped between the movable surface
(mantle) and the Àxed surface (concave or bowl), resulting in them being nipped and
broken. The mantle then recedes from the concave and the broken particles move down
the chamber. After more crushing cycles, the product is discharged.
A sketch showing how the crusher works is given in Figure 6.1a and an FLSmidth gyratory
crusher is shown in Figure 6.1b. The capacity of the crusher depends on the physical size of
the crusher, the discharge opening (OSS) and the Áowability of the feed. ,n large gyratory
crushers, the crushing chamber is very steep and therefore the Ànes content of the feed
will have a signiÀcant impact on the throughput of a machine. The relationship between
capacity and discharge opening (OSS) is shown in Table 6.1. ,t is important to note that in
Table 6.1, the discharge opening quoted is the OSS. ,n cone crushers, throughput is always
quoted in terms of CSS. Gyratory crushers do not require a feed system as other crushers
do, and trucks can directly discharge their load into the gyratory crusher.
A B
TABLE 6.1
Capacities (Mt/h) of gyratory crushers with different discharge settings (source: Metso).
Feed opening Discharge opening (mm) kW Crusher weight
(mm) 150 175 200 230 250 (t)
1065 2335 2820 375 119
1370 2885 3145 3485 450 242
1525 4540 5295 5805 600 398
1525 5525 7335 8280 8890 1200 553
Jaw crusher
The jaw crusher was patented in 188 after the Àrst crusher had been built in 18 to
prepare rocks for road building. Essentially, the design has changed little since that time.
A jaw crusher consists of converging movable and Àxed jaws as shown in Figure 6..
The moving jaw is driven through a toggle joint, which exerts immense pressure
on the jaw. Figure 6. shows a double toggle jaw crusher conÀguration, which was
traditionally used for crushing harder feed types as the use of the double toggle
arrangement provided a better crushing action. The need for a double toggle jaw
crusher is indicated by unconÀned compressive strength (8CS) measurements a 8CS
measurement in excess of 0Pa requires a double toggle. Single toggle machines
as shown in Figure 6., were commonly reserved for lighter crushing duties. Over
the last years, advances in design and fabrication have allowed single toggle jaw
crushers to become the machine of choice, even for harder applications. They offer
higher throughput and reduced mass compared to the double toggle machines. The
capacity of any size of machine depends on its CSS, which can be adjusted. Data
showing the relationship between capacity and CSS for a hard, dry ore are given in
Table 6.. Capacities are dependent on the ore and do not apply to difÀcult ores such
as those containing sticky clays.
FIG 6.2 – Double toggle jaw crusher (image courtesy Pennsylvania Crushing).
gyratory crusher, but the long-term costs of a jaw crusher tend to be higher. If both jaw
crusher and gyratory crusher can meet the requirements of feed size, range of discharge
openings and processing capacity, it is the initial cost and ongoing operating cost that
are the most important elements in crusher selection. The main advantage of gyratory
crushers is the ability to accept feed directly from trucks; jaw crushers require a feed
system as well as a grizzly to remove oversize rocks.
TABLE 6.3
Relationship between feed rate and closed side setting for FLSmidth Raptor cone crushers.
Crusher Small Small Large Large
Closed side setting Feed range Closed side setting Feed range
(mm) (Mt/h) (mm) (Mt/h)
Shorthead fine 10 250–350
Shorthead medium 13 325–450 13 770–1200
Shorthead coarse 16 400–550 16 870–1250
Standard fine 25 525–770 25 1200–1900
Standard medium 38 650–1050 38 1700–2100
Standard course 45 780–1250 45 1900–2500
FIG 6.7 – Crushing circuit at Bougainville Copper Ltd showing the roles of
compression crushers (image courtesy Bougainville Copper Ltd).
ϭϬϬ
ϵϬ
ĐƵŵƵůĂƚŝǀĞƉĞƌĐĞŶƚƉĂƐƐŝŶŐй
ϴϬ
ϳϬ
ϲϬ
ϱϬ
ƐĞĐ͘ĐƌƵƐŚĞƌĨĞĞĚ
ϰϬ
ƐĞĐ͘ĐƌƵƐŚĞƌƉƌŽĚƵĐƚ
ϯϬ
ƚĞƌ͘ĐƌƵƐŚĞƌĨĞĞĚ
ϮϬ
ƚĞƌ͘ĐƌƵƐŚĞƌƉƌŽĚƵĐƚ
ϭϬ
DĨĞĞĚ
Ϭ
ϭ ϭϬ ϭϬϬ ϭϬϬϬ
ƉĂƌƚŝĐůĞ ƐŝnjĞ;ŵŵͿ
FIG 6.8 – Particle size distributions of flotation feed and secondary and tertiary cone crusher
feeds and products at Bougainville Copper Ltd (image courtesy Bougainville Copper Ltd).
Rhodax crusher
Fives FC%, which makes the Rhodax crusher, is a 00-year-old French company with
expertise in turnkey cement plants, cement and mineral grinding plants and processing
equipment for the cement and mineral grinding industries. The crusher is an inertial
grinder that works on the pressurised bed fragmentation principle. The fragmentation
force is caused by the rotation of unbalanced masses rather than by an eccentric mass
as is the case in a conventional crusher. This makes it possible to achieve very high
reduction ratios. %y controlling the speed of rotation of the unbalanced masses, the
grinding force can be modiÀed, thus changing the product size distribution.
The components of the Rhodax crusher are
x the bowl subassembly (bowl), which consists of a frame supporting the bowl liner
x the cone subassembly (cone), which is a structure supporting the vertical shaft and
the cone (head) protected by the mantle
x the cone, which is attached to the bowl by rods and ball joints
x the bowl, which is supported by elastic suspensions to minimise the transmission
of vibrations.
The driven part of the Rhodax is the bowl, while the cone subassembly is allowed to
deÁect as a result of the applied grinding force. The mantle (cone liner) is free to rotate
around the centre shaft. The variables that are controlled are the gap opening and the
rotation speed of the unbalanced masses. High-pressure Rhodax crushers have motors
from 0–900 kW and produce 600 th of Àne crushed rock from 150 mm feed. Figure 6.9
presents details of the Rhodax crusher.
FIG 6.9 – Rhodax crusher: (A) components, (B) crushing mechanism (image courtesy Fives FCB).
Vibrocone crusher
The 9ibrocone crusher is similar to the Rhodax crusher and its method of operation is
discussed in 8S patent 795475 (%elotserkovsky, 010). The discharge gap and rotor
speed are controlled by internal sensors to produce the maximum feed rate. The main
shaft is supported by a spherical bearing. An unbalanced weight rotating around the
main shaft causes the mantle to swing without restraint, and the rock is crushed by
multiple compressions between the mantle and the concave (Figure 6.10). The crusher
is choke fed and all particles in the moving bed are compressed, resulting in breakage.
8ltrasonic sensors detect the position and angle of inclination of the mantle and the data
are used to control the crusher by varying the discharge gap and rotational speed of the
shaft. A comparison of the Rhodax and 9icrocone bed breakage compression crushers
is shown in Table 6.4.
TABLE 6.4
Comparison of bed breakage compression crushers.
Sandvik Vibrocone crusher Fives FCB Rhodax crusher
Rated power (kW) 400 Up to 900
Capacity (Mt/h) 200–300 Up to 600
Feed size (max) 150 220
Product size 80% passing 6–8 mm, 50% passing 2–4 mm 0–500 μm to 0–40 mm in closed circuit
A B C
FIG 6.10 – Sketches of the Vibrocone crusher (US patent 7954735). (A) The crusher with its sensors
(R, D1) and controller (D4), (B) an example of the angle and deviation of the mantle moving
without restraint, (C) Vibrocone crusher in operation (images courtesy Fives FCB).
ROLLS CRUSHERS
Rolls crushers represent one of the oldest types of compression machine and consist
of two counter rotating rolls, with the feed material fed into the gap between them.
The rolls surface is mostly smooth or has a superimposed pattern of wear protection.
,n some cases, teeth are afÀ[ed to the surface. $n e[ample of a modern rolls crusher is
shown in Figure 6.11.
Due to the wear displayed when crushing abrasive material, rolls crushers fell out of
favour, with gyratory and cone crushers typically preferred. However, over the last ten
years, rolls crushers have begun to regain some favour due to their ability to deliver very
high throughputs and advances in wear materials and teeth change-out procedures.
The main applications for rolls crushers are usually in oil sands, but a recent application
in iron ore in Brazil has been reported.
$ modern development of the rolls crusher is the H3*R crusher, which is discussed in
more detail in a later section.
MINERAL SIZERS
Sizers were developed in the mid-to-late 1970s to break coarse coal efÀciently within
compact dimensions. The basic concept of the sizer is to apply pressure to material and
cause it to fracture along natural planes of weakness. This is done by the use of two
rotors with large teeth on small diameter shafts driven at low speed by a direct high-
torque drive system. This concept is shown in the 00D twin shaft mineral Sizer
illustrated in Figure 6.1.
The rotating shafts in the sizer have large teeth attached to them that form scrolls
similar to Archimedean screws. These help to spread material around the machine.
The interlaced toothed rotor design allows undersize to pass through the gaps
generated by the slow-moving shafts to prevent further degradation of already
undersize material. An adjustable breaker bar is positioned centrally in line with and
below the breaker shafts.
The nature of the crushing mechanism for a sizer is shown in Figure 6.1. The material
is initially gripped by the leading faces of opposed rotor teeth. These subject the rock
to multiple point loading, inducing stress into the material to exploit any natural
weaknesses. From initial breakage, the product is further broken in tension by being
subjected to three-point loading, which is applied between the front tooth faces on
one rotor and rear tooth faces on the other. Any lumps of material that still remain
A B C
FIG 6.13 – Breakage in an MMD Sizer. (A) Stage 1 – initial breakage of large material: teeth closing. (B) Stage 2 – further
breakage of material as the teeth pass each other at the mid-point: teeth passing. (C) Stage 3 – breakage of remaining
oversize from teeth chopping through the breaker bar: teeth chop through breaker bar (images courtesy MMD).
oversize are held by the Àxed teeth of the breaker bar and broken by the chopping
action of the rotors.
The 00D Sizer has a number of sizer, shaft and tooth conÀgurations to enable the
primary, secondary and tertiary reduction of materials. On certain materials, primary
00D sizers can process at rates in excess of 1 000 th. The method of reduction utilising
the weakness of materials in shear and tension offers a controlled three-dimensional
outfeed product with different tooth designs to facilitate different sizes of outfeed in an
efÀcient manner.
A typical reduction ratio in a sizer is 51, and rocks that are 000 mm in size and even
larger can be reduced. Sizers can handle dry hard and wet sticky material simultaneously
through the same machine, even where the moisture content is over 0 per cent. They
are suitable for softer rocks such as bauxite and pisolitic iron ore, but can also process
‘hard rock’ up to 400 0Pa with satisfactory results. For example, metalliferous ores
at CODELCO Andina and El Teniente (approximately 0 0Pa) are currently being
crushed successfully. The rock quality designation (RQD) gives a better indication of
the weaknesses that exist in the rocks to be processed and that can be exploited by the
00D method of reduction.
As Table 6.5 indicates, sizers are smaller than other crushers, with height being a
measure of particular signiÀcance because it is the main parameter deÀning the opening
that must be prepared when a sizer is to be used underground. The 1500 series of sizers,
which is currently the largest series, has a height of 195 mm, but larger capacity sizers
are being developed.
The nominal capacity of each unit is 1000 th of medium-hard limestone. The infeed
size is 750 mm and the product size is 50 mm.
TABLE 6.5
Comparison of primary mineral crushers (MMD).
Equipment Gyratory Jaw Sizer Double roll Impactor
crusher
Dimensions (mm) 11 938 2240 × 1680 1000 series 1800 × 1800 2000 × 2200
Weight (t) 120 170 60 70 85
ROLLER MILLS
%reakage occurs in roller mills by compression, and because this type of breakage is
more energy efÀcient than impact breakage, there is a trend towards using roller mills
for Àne-grinding circuits. The perennial problem with roller mills that limits their use
with hard or abrasive material is wear of the rollers and the grinding surfaces, but this
is now being reduced by the development of new materials for their construction and of
new designs for the wearing surfaces (refer to Figure 6.14).
Roller mills are suitable for grinding friable materials. For example, the Gundlach
machine can grind up to 40 th of 19 mm friable material and yield a 1– mm product.
Sturtevant is another manufacturer of roller mills. Table 6.6 provides some details of
horizontal roller mills.
The largest horizontal roller mills now in operation are those that are used to crush
hot cement clinker, leaving the kiln to the size at which it can be ground in roller mills
A B C
FIG 6.14 – Some crushing roll designs: (A) one inch pin, (B) herringbone roll,
(C) 27 pocket tooth roll (images courtesy Gundlach crushers).
TABLE 6.6
Horizontal roller mills (Sturtevant Inc).
Power (kW) Feed size (mm) Product size Capacity (t/h)
2 19 12.7 mm to 850 micron 0.25 to 2
5 19 12.7 mm to 850 micron 1 to 7
2 × 10 38 19 to 1.6 mm 5 to 44
or ball mills. The hot clinker passes through a cooling zone and is then crushed by
horizontal rolls (refer to Figure 6.15). The rolls have a wide gap to break the coarser
lumps and maintain a high capacity. The kiln and cooling and crushing system operate
at up to 1 500 td. Hot clinker breaks easily, and hammer mills are also used for
breakage.
A B
FIG 6.15 – (A) Cooling system and (B) crushing rolls for hot clinker. Rolls are
up to 4 m long, 8.5 m wide and 0.9 m deep (images courtesy Claudius Peters).
which shows that one roller rotates in Àxed bearings and the other in moveable bearings,
with high pressure applied to the moveable roller via the hydraulic pistons. Table 6.7
presents a comparison of HPGRs in terms of speciÀcations and capacities.
Agglomeration also occurs with compression machines, and a HPGR machine is often
followed by a device to break up the agglomerates. HPGRs are rarely used as stand-
alone machines to produce Ànished cement as HPGR products contain coarse particles
that must be ground further (refer to Figure 6.17). This is easier with compressed rather
than with uncompressed particles because the high pressure forms microcracks that
reduce grindability and minimise the energy required for further grinding. HPGRs
work on similar feed size particles to cone crushers, but the shapes of the product PSDs
differ because of different breakage mechanisms (Figure 6.18).
FIG 6.16 – High-pressure grinding rolls crushing mechanism (image courtesy ThyssenKrupp).
TABLE 6.7
Sizes and capacities of commercial high-pressure grinding rolls.
KHD FLSmidth Koppern Polysius Metso Fives FCB
Diameter (m) 1.0–2.6 0.58–2.7 0.80–2.80 0.95–2.60 0.8–3.0 1.6–4.6
Width (m) 0.5–2.3 0.26–1.85 0.20–1.60 0.65–1.75 0.5–2.0 0.54–1.67
Power (kW) 280–6000 100–5800 150–4000 440–6800 220–11 500 200–3800
Throughput (t/h) 30–4200 100–3000 35–2000 >3000 70–4800 70–1200
The Fives FCB machine refers to the Horomill.
FIG 6.17 – Particle size distribution comparison of high-pressure grinding rolls and cone crushers (image courtesy Weir Minerals).
FIG 6.18 – Feed and product size distributions from high-pressure grinding rolls (image courtesy Hakan Dundar).
As shown in Figure 6.19, HPGRs, ball mills and separators are used in cement clinker
JULQGLQJFLUFXLWVLQYDULRXVFRQÀJXUDWLRQV
6HPLÀQLVKJULQGLQJDQGFORVHGFLUFXLWSUHJULQGLQJDUHWKHPRVWHIÀFLHQWPHWKRGVLQ
WHUPVRIVSHFLÀFHQHUJ\FRQVXPSWLRQ)LQLVKJULQGLQJLVQRWZLGHVSUHDGVLQFHLWJLYHVD
VWHHS36'WKDWUHGXFHVWKHVWUHQJWKRIWKHFHPHQW&ORVHGFLUFXLW+3*5VIROORZHGE\D
EDOOPLOOLVWKHEHVWRSWLRQIRUFHPHQWSURGXFWLRQ
The rolls in HPGRs require periodic reconditioning, and this means extraction and
WUDQVSRUWRIWKHUROOVWKHPVHOYHV$VLQJOHUROODQGDWWDFKHGVKDIWDQGEHDULQJKRXVLQJV
VXEDVVHPEO\ W\SLFDOO\ ZHLJKV RYHU W $ +3*5 UROOV H[WUDFWRU WUDQVSRUWHU GHYLFH
LV DYDLODEOH ZKLFK XVHV ODVHU PHDVXULQJ WR H[WUDFW WKH UROOV HYHQO\ DQG DFFXUDWHO\ VR
WKDWWKHULVNRIGDPDJLQJWKHSUHFLVLRQPDFKLQHG+3*5IUDPHLVHOLPLQDWHG5XVVHOO
Mineral Equipment).
Briquetting is also carried out in compressed beds. Roller diameters in briquette
SUHVVHV DUH IURP ² P DQG SUHVVXUH LV IURP ² N1 $JJORPHUDWLRQ DQG
A B
C D
FIG 6.19 – Alternative flow sheets in a cement plant using high-pressure grinding rolls, a ball
mill and a separator. (A) Open-circuit pregrinding, (B) hybrid grinding, (C) semi-finish grinding,
(D) closed circuit grinding, (E) finish grinding (images courtesy Hakan Dundar).
breakage occurs in compressed bed machines, and it is usual to follow HPGRs with
a de-agglomerating unit. HPGRs were only used with softer minerals for many years
because hard abrasive ores caused wear on the expensive rollers, but better materials
and new designs for the wearing surfaces have reduced this problem.
A Àner size distribution is produced from the centre of the HPGR than the two edges.
Depending on the product size distribution requirements, edge products are sometimes
recycled to the feed for further crushing.
A B
FIG 6.20 – Vertical roller mill: (A) rollers and separator in a Gebr Pfeiffer mill,
(B) typical particle size distribution of product and reject (images courtesy Gebr Pfeiffer).
TABLE 6.8
Sizes and capacities of vertical roller mills.
Power (kW) Feed rate (t/h)
FLSmidth
Cement 800–11 000 35–685
Slag 900–13 200 25–500
Polysius
Cement raw material 580–4800 90–740
Clinker 3000 Blaine 502–3188 33–209
Granulated Slag 4500 Blaine 700–4450 22–139
Hard coal 50° Hardgrove 30–1250 22–96
Loesche
Coal 400–2400 40–300
Cement 2500–7800 60–340
Ore 7800 >2000
Gebr Pfeiffer
Cement raw material 1600–12 000 250–1400
Granulated slag 2000–6000 Blaine 2500–12 000 70–390
Cement 2000–6000 Blaine 2200–12 000 80–550
With each different method of applying pressure, the rollers track differently.
Uncompacted cement tends to aerate so that a compacting roller leads each grinding
roller and forms a compact mass that can be ground. The PSD of cement is sharper
with VRMs than with ball mills and is in a narrower band. A sharper cut potentially
means less variability in product consistency and more predictable results in product
A B
C D
FIG 6.21 – Methods of applying force to grinding rollers. (A) Raymond ring-roller mill, (B) EVT (CE) roller
mill, (C) Loesche roller mill, (D) MPS roller grinding mill, (E) ring-ball mill (images courtesy Loesche).
HOROMILLS
Horomills, seen in Figure 6., were developed by Fives FC% and are a recent addition
to the group of mills that use compression breakage.
The key components of the Horomill are a shell driven at supercritical speed and a roller
compressing the mineral bed at high pressure by means of hydraulic jacks. Capacities
for different product sizes (Blaine numbers) for cement, slag and raw meal are given in
Table 6.9. The electrical power available with the largest machine is 2940 kW.
7KH +RURPLOO GLVFKDUJH LV HOHYDWHG WR WKH FODVVLÀHU DQG WKH FORVHG FLUFXLW ZLWK WKH
DLU ÁRZV LV VKRZQ LQ )LJXUH 7KH PDWHULDO LV IHG IURP RQH VLGH DQG GLVFKDUJHG
from the other after being ground several times between the shell and the roller as it
passes through the mill. The material centrifuges and scrapers remove the compressed,
comminuted bed from the wall and present it in a loosened form to the roller for further
grinding. The material being ground undergoes a multiple and controlled compression
EHWZHHQWKHUROOHUDQGWKHVKHOO·VJULQGLQJWUDFN$VZLWKRWKHUUROOHUPLOOVWKHVSHFLÀF
HQHUJ\FRQVXPSWLRQLVORZ)LJXUHSUHVHQWVWKH36'IRU+RURPLOOVIRUWKHIHHGDQG
various product streams.
TABLE 6.9
Capacity of Horomills.
Size Indicative capacity t/h
Shell diameter Portland cement Blast furnace slag Raw meal
(mm) 3000 Blaine 4000 Blaine 3500 Blaine 4500 Blaine
2000 20 12 12 8 35–55
2800 50 30 30 20 90–140
3600 95 60 60 40 175–275
3800 110 70 130 90 260
4400 160 100 100 70 255–470
FIG 6.23 – Horomill-TSV® classifier closed circuit (image courtesy Fives FCB).
a SAG feed with a top size of approximately 250–400 mm rocks and for the crushing of
pebbles generated by the SAG mill. Several circuits are now used to achieve the same
F80 to P80 for an ore, with all requiring different amounts of energy. Many factors are
considered when choosing a circuit, and Table 6.10 gives an indication of the relative
energy consumption of different circuits.
It is interesting to note that the push to reduce energy consumption in milling and
WKH UHODWLYH HQHUJ\ HIÀFLHQF\ RI FUXVKLQJ KDV OHG WR D UHVXUJHQFH LQ QRQ6$*EDVHG
ÁRZVKHHWV5HFHQWH[DPSOHVRIFUXVKHU+3*5EDOOPLOOFLUFXLWVLQFOXGH1HZPRQW
Boddington and Karara Mining in Australia and Cerro Verde in Chile. There is also a
VLJQLÀFDQWLQFUHDVHLQIXOORUSDUWLDOSUH6$*FUXVKLQJRSWLRQV6HYHUDORSHUDWLRQVKDYH
DOUHDG\GHSOR\HGVXFKDQDSSURDFKLQFOXGLQJ,QPHW7URLOXVDQG1HZFUHVW5LGJHZD\
and wider application is being considered to explore options for further energy saving.
TABLE 6.10
Relative energy consumption of different comminution circuits (Marsden, 2011).
Circuit Decrease (%)
Semi-autogenous grinding mills, ball mills Base case
Semi-autogenous grinding mills, pebble crusher, ball mills 6.4
Autogenous grinding mills, pebble crusher, ball mills 22.1
Three-stage crushing, ball mills 25.7
Two-stage crushing, high-pressure grinding rolls, ball mills 34.6
Two-stage crushing, high-pressure grinding rolls, agitator mills ≈41.4
Improved classification ≈46
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Belotserkovsky, K E, 2010. Method for controlling process parameters of a cone crusher, US
3DWHQW6DQGYLN
Brundiek, + 7KH UROOHU JULQGLQJ PLOO ² LWV KLVWRU\ DQG FXUUHQW VLWXDWLRQ Aufbereitungs-
Technik
Marsden, - 2 ,QQRYDWLRQ DQG HQHUJ\ HIÀFLHQF\ LQ FRSSHU H[WUDFWLRQ SDSHU SUHVHQWHG WR
3URFHPLQ&RQIHUHQFH6DQWLDJR'HFHPEHU
Taylor, J C, 5KRGD[LQHUWLDOFRQHJULQGHUJournal of The South African Institute of Mining and
Metallurgy,2FWREHUSS²
Catalogues for crushers referred to in this chapter are available on the internet. The companies are
x Claudius Peters
x FLSmidth
x Gebr Pfeiffer
x Loesche Gmbh
x 0etso Nordberg (Symons crushers)
x 00D Group (Sizers)
x Pennsylvania Crushing
x Russell 0ineral Equipment (R0E)
x Sandvik (9ibrocone crushers)
x Thyssen.rupp.
Chapter 7
INTRODUCTION
In high-speed impact mills, breakage and shattering occurs by fast-moving hammers
impacting on slow-moving rock, or by the collision of fast-moving rocks with other
rocks or a breaker plate. Machines that use both techniques are available, but there has
been a greater application for comminution of moderate-to-low-hardness material of
low abrasion potential. The reason is because wear is a potentially serious problem.
A rule of thumb is that steel hammers are suitable for materials containing no more than
Àve per cent silica doubtful for a silica content of ten per cent to per cent dangerous
for per cent to per cent and prohibitive if it e[ceeds per cent. 5ock on rock
breakage reduces the problem of wear.
Four common types of high-speed impact mill are reviewed in this chapter.
FIG 7.1 – Barmac vertical shaft impact crusher. The dry stone ‘pump’
(rotating drum) is shown in the centre of the machine (image courtesy Metso).
The product size distribution can be controlled by the rotor speed as shown in
Figure ..
In the Magotteau[ MA*·Impact® 96I crusher Figure ., the material to be crushed
falls onto a distributor at the centre of the rotating table. Particles are accelerated by
impellors on the table and driven toward anvils on the peripheral ring where the impact
causes shattering. The ma[imum table diameter is mm, and four to Àve impellors
and to anvils can be used.
Table . gives an indication of the capacities of 96I crushers for different motor sizes.
&apacities are highly dependent on the characteristics of the material being crushed.
ϭϬϬ
ϵϬ &ĞĞĚ
WƌŽĚƵĐƚͲϰϱŵͬƐƚŝƉƐƉĞĞĚ
ϴϬ WƌŽĚƵĐƚͲϲϱŵͬƐƚŝƉƐƉĞĞĚ
ϳϬ
ϲϬ
WĂƐƐŝŶŐ й
ϱϬ
ϰϬ
ϯϬ
ϮϬ
ϭϬ
Ϭ
Ϭ͘ϭ ϭ ϭϬ ϭϬϬ
^ŝnjĞ ;ŵŵͿ
FIG 7.2 – Product size distribution showing the effect of rotor speed
in a Barmac vertical shaft impact crusher (image courtesy Metso).
FIG 7.3 – Magotteaux MAG’Impact® vertical shaft impact crusher (image courtesy Magotteaux).
TABLE 7.1
Examples of verticle shaft impact crusher specifications.
Barmac MAG’Impact®
Motor (kW) 75–600 200–500
Capacity (t/h) 60–477 200–500
Maximum rock velocity (m/s) 85 65
HAMMER MILLS
Hammer mills work on the principle that most materials will crush, shatter or pulverise
upon impact. The hammer mill is the most widely used crusher with thousands
employed worldwide in a large number of industries for primary and secondary
crushing of various material. In the minerals industry, hammer mills are used to crush
materials such as hard coal and lignite, limestone, bau[ite, phosphate rock and other
soft to medium-hard rocks or ores. Mill sizes range from small laboratory units to very
high capacity machines. A large k: industrial machine is shown in Figure ..
ƌŽƚŽƌĂŶĚƌŽƚŽƌƐŚĂĨƚ
ĐĂƐŝŶŐ
ŚĂŵŵĞƌ
ŐƌĂƚĞ
FIG 7.5 – Method of operation for a hammer mill (image courtesy Hakan Dundar).
TABLE 7.2
Sandvik Mining hammer mills used for coal crushing.
Roll diameter × length (mm) Throughput (t/h)
1000 × 1000 75
1400 × 1800 250
1400 × 2600 400
1600 × 2600 500
1600 × 3400 700
Feed to 250 mm; product size to <1 mm depending on feed material; installed power to 1800 kW.
TABLE 7.3
Schutte Buffalo hammer mills used for coal crushing.
Throughput (t/h) Power (kW) Rev/min (max)
0.25–0.5 7.5 3500
0.5–1.0 15 3500
1.5–5 30 2325
6–15 75 1860
20–50 150 1395
50–100 225 1395
Maximum tip speed is 74 m/s.
FIG 7.6 – Dual Atrita mill where the coal flows through the hammer and attrition
mills using the same horizontal shaft (image courtesy Glenn Schumacher, AGL).
FIG 7.7 – Dual Atrita mill with product size distribution from each section of the mill (image courtesy Glenn Schumacher, AGL).
hammers is estimated to be 52 m/s and the tip velocity of the grinding clips on the
attrition wheel is calculated at 100 m/s. The coal passes through the hammer mill
VHFWLRQWKHQWKURXJKWKHÀUVWDQGVHFRQGDWWULWLRQVHFWLRQVDQGHPHUJHVDVSXOYHULVHG
fuel from the fan section.
very high moisture content up to per cent and tend to be Àbrous in nature. High-
speed beater mills fall into two categories:
. a beater wheel mill in which the comminution element consists of a high-speed
armoured beater wheel alone
2. a hammerbeater wheel mill with a primary hammer section in front of the beater
wheel section.
A beater wheel in effect is an armoured impellor that both impacts directly with the raw
coal feed as well as propelling the coal against the armoured mill casing. These actions both
bring about comminution of the feed and also allow the mi[ing of hot gases with the coal
to dry it. At the same time the beater wheel acts as a fan to provide the means of drawing
hot gas from the boiler furnace, which enters the mill with the feed, and propelling the
pulverised mill product pulverised fuel ² PF and associated carrier gas to the site of
combustion in the boiler furnace. Most have a ¶bo[ classiÀer· if any classiÀer is present
at all, which is actually an inertia-type static classiÀer in which separation occurs by a
change in Áow direction. In nearly all major lignite-Àred power plants, the crude lignite is
dried and pulverised in beater wheel mills.
The high moisture load of these coals requires signiÀcant drying to occur in the mill. The
use of hot gases from the boiler furnace results in very large boiler plant and comple[ burner
arrangements to handle the vapour load and circulating gases. To achieve the necessary
drying, mills pulverising lignite brown coal run very hot with gas temperatures around
2²&. :ith such high moisture loads the mills are required to handle very large gas
volumes as the moisture is converted in water vapour plus the drying boiler furnace
gases and the conditions within the mill are such that corrosion-erosion mechanisms can
occur in these machines. :hilst the coal is generally ¶soft·, the high speeds, high volumes
of material being processed and resulting high velocities when coincidental with some
contaminants in the coal, such as silica, mean that high wear rates can be encountered.
FIG 7.8 – Beater wheel pulveriser at AGL Loy Yang A Power Station,
Victoria, Australia (image courtesy Glenn Schumacher, AGL).
The beater wheel shown in Figure . stands m high, weighs 2 t, spins at appro[-
imately revmin within the mill and operates in temperatures around 2²&.
The pulverised coal is classiÀed and the Àne particles are blown into the boiler to fuel
the furnace Àre. 6ilica in the lignite is abrasive and the beater wheels must be changed
regularly. The largest beater wheel offered by Alstom is mm high.
The Deutsche Babcock combined hammer and beater wheel mills at the Hazelwood
power station in 9ictoria, Australia each has a k: motor and th capacity. There
are in all ² a signiÀcant amount of comminution devices in one place.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Worley, -, 6chumacher, * and -uniper, /, 2. (ffects of coal properties upon mill life and
performance, in Proceedings Tenth Australian Coal Science Conference, Brisbane, ² November
Australian Institute of (nergy: Melbourne.
&atalogues for the high-speed impact mills referred to in this chapter are available on the internet.
The companies are:
• Alstom Beater :heel Mills
• Atrita mills
• Magotteau[ MA*·Impact® 9ertical 6haft Impact &rusher
• Metso Barmac 9ertical 6haft Impact &rusher
• 5iley Power
• 6andvik Hammer Mills
• 6chutte Buffalo Hammermill //&.
Chapter 8
STIRRED MILLS
Udo Enderle, Katie Barns,
Joe Pease and Bodo Furchner
INTRODUCTION
*ULQGLQJ LV GHÀQHG DV EUHDNLQJ XS D VROLG VWUXFWXUH E\ VXEMHFWLQJ LW WR PHFKDQLFDO
HQHUJ\*ULQGLQJSURFHVVHVFDQEHFODVVLÀHGDVWUXHFRPPLQXWLRQGHDJJORPHUDWLRQRU
GLVDJJUHJDWLRQ6WLUUHGRUDJLWDWRUEHDGPLOOVDUHXVHGIRUJULQGLQJSDUWLFOHVZLWKDIHHG
VL]HVPDOOHUWKDQ²P7KH\EHORQJWRWKHFODVVRIPDFKLQHVZLWKIUHHO\PRYLQJ
JULQGLQJPHGLDWKHFODVVLFH[DPSOHRIZKLFKLVEDOOPLOOV,QURWDWLQJPLOOVOLNHEDOOPLOOV
HQHUJ\LVLPSDUWHGWRWKHPHGLDE\WKHURWDWLQJVKHOO7KLVOLPLWVWKHHQHUJ\WRWKHVKHOO·V
FULWLFDOVSHHG,QFRQWUDVWLQVWLUUHGPLOOVWKHVKHOOLVVWDWLRQDU\DQGHQHUJ\LVLPSDUWHG
YLDLQWHUQDOURWDWLQJPHFKDQLVPVUHPRYLQJWKHFULWLFDOVSHHGOLPLW
6WLUUHGPLOOVDUHIXUWKHUFDWHJRULVHGLQWRORZVSHHGVWLUUHGPLOOVDQGKLJKVSHHGVWLUUHG
PLOOV/RZVSHHGPLOOVDUHW\SLÀHGE\PLOOVVXFKDV¶WRZHUPLOOV·ZKLFKXVHVWHHOPHGLD
KDYHHQHUJ\LQWHQVLWLHVFORVHWRURWDWLQJPLOOVDQGDUHXVHGIRUFUHDWLQJSURGXFWLQWKH
UDQJHEHWZHHQEDOOPLOOVDQGXOWUDÀQHVWLUUHGPLOOVEURDGO\²PIRUP+LJK
VSHHG VWLUUHG PLOOV ZHUH GHYHORSHG IRU XOWUDÀQH JULQGLQJ DSSOLFDWLRQV ZLWK SURGXFW
VL]HEHORZPRIP7KH\KDYHVLJQLÀFDQWO\KLJKHUSRZHULQWHQVLW\PD\EHYHUWLFDO
RU KRUL]RQWDO DQG XVH D YDULHW\ RI VWLUUHU GHVLJQV ZLWK ÀQH FHUDPLF PHGLD ,QLWLDOO\
DSSOLHG WR UHODWLYHO\ VRIW LQGXVWULDO PLQHUDOV WKH\ ZHUH WKHQ GHYHORSHG IRU XOWUDÀQH
JULQGLQJLQWKHPLQLQJLQGXVWU\LQUHVSRQVHWRWKHLQFUHDVLQJO\ÀQHJUDLQHGRUHERGLHV
2QO\VLQFHDERXWKDYHVRPHEHHQDSSOLHGWRFRDUVHUJULQGVDERYHPRIP
ZKHUHSUHYLRXVO\ORZVSHHGVWLUUHGPLOOVRUURWDWLQJPLOOVZRXOGKDYHEHHQXVHG
6WLUUHG PLOOV FDQ EH IRU HLWKHU ZHW JULQGLQJ ZLWK D VOXUU\ IHHG RU GU\ JULQGLQJ
:HWJULQGLQJLVPRUHHQHUJ\HIÀFLHQWWKDQGU\JULQGLQJ7KLVLVSDUWO\GXHWRWKHHQHUJ\
WKDW WKH FODVVLÀHU LQ WKH GU\ SURFHVVLQJ FRQVXPHV KRZHYHU IRU VRPH DSSOLFDWLRQV ²
IRU H[DPSOH FHPHQW ² D GU\ SURGXFW LV HVVHQWLDO DQG GLFWDWHV D GU\JULQGLQJ SURFHVV
,Q PRVW PLQLQJ DSSOLFDWLRQV WKH XSVWUHDP DQG GRZQVWUHDP SURFHVVLQJ LV ZHW IRU
H[DPSOH EDOOPLOOLQJÁRWDWLRQRUOHDFKLQJVRZHWJULQGLQJLVW\SLFDOO\XVHG,QRWKHU
applications, some ores are dry ground and combusted before leaching (for example,
treating some Nevada gold ores) while grinding coal for combustion. It is possible for a
wet-grinding process to be employed and the product subsequently dewatered and dried.
This will depend on the relative energy and complexity of milling and drying. As the
slurries in the wet mills are highly concentrated, up to 75 per cent solid content, an energy-
efÀcient drying of the slurry is possible. 6een from the aspect of energy consumption, there
may be an advantage for wet grinding including drying compared to dry processing.
2nly about two to per cent of the energy expended in grinding is efÀciently used
for the generation of new surfaces; most is converted to heat or lost through ineffective
impacts and loads. This emphasises the necessity to improve all grinding practices,
particularly Àne grinding, which is so energy intensive.
Tumbling mills were found to be particularly inefÀcient for Àne grinding because the
slow speed of rotation led to low power intensity and a low rate of ball collisions. In 1928
a stationary grinding chamber was proposed in which spherical grinding media were
moved by a slowly rotating agitator (.wade and 6chwedes 1997). 0ill performance
could be controlled by increasing the agitator speed and using Àner balls.
In 1948 the du Pont Company built a high-speed mill for grinding pigment using
this concept. It was referred to as a ‘sand mill’ because the grinding media originally
consisted of Àne-grained sand fractions. This is why high speed mills are still referred
to as ‘sandmills’ in the 86, although they now use ceramic media si]ed between .1 and
8 mm. The initial stirrer was a vertical cantilevered shaft with solid discs that operated
at speeds of 600 to 800 rev/min (8–11 m/s). The discs were concentric in alignment with
slurry entering from the bottom of the mill and exiting at the top.
FIG 8.1 – Particle size of the feed stock showing the size range where agitator bead mills fit in. The
coarse end of this range is populated by slow-speed stirred mills, the finer end by high-speed stirred mills.
Bead mills are used to disperse both colloidal and coarser particles (image courtesy Hans Rumpf).
,QDJLWDWRUPLOOVWKHEHDGVDUHNHSWLQPRWLRQE\GLVFVRUSHJVDWWDFKHGWRKLJKVSHHG
VWLUUHUVDQGWKHPDLQEUHDNDJHPHFKDQLVPLVWKHDWWULWLRQRISDUWLFOHVE\FROOLVLRQZLWK
HDFKRWKHURUZLWKWKHPHGLD2SHUDWLQJWKHVKDIWDWKLJKHUWLSVSHHGVWUDQVPLWVPRUH
HQHUJ\ IURP PHGLD WR SDUWLFOHV DQG UHVXOWV LQ D ÀQHU JULQG 6RPH DWWDFKPHQWV WR WKH
VKDIWXVHGWRWUDQVPLWHQHUJ\DUHVKRZQLQ)LJXUH)HHGPDWHULDOFDQEHXSWRPP
DOWKRXJKLWLVXVXDOO\PXFKÀQHU3URGXFWVZLOOXVXDOO\EHOHVVWKDQPIRUKLJKVSHHG
VWLUUHGPLOOV0LOOVFDQEHIHGE\VOXUU\ZHWJULQGLQJRUGU\VROLGV*ULQGLQJPHGLD
DUHFKRVHQWRVXLWWKHSURFHVVWKH\FDQEHVPDOOVWHHORUFHUDPLFEDOOVRUVL]HIUDFWLRQV
RILQHUWPLQHUDOV²VRPHWLPHVHYHQDIUDFWLRQVFUHHQHGIURPWKHRUH,QHUWPLQHUDOVRU
FHUDPLFEDOOVPD\EHLPSRUWDQWWRGRZQVWUHDPSURFHVVLQJIRUH[DPSOHÁRWDWLRQRU
SURGXFWVLURQFRQWDPLQDWLRQZRXOGDGYHUVHO\DIIHFWWKHFRORXURIFHPHQW
FIG 8.2 – Attachments to a shaft to create agitation (image courtesy Udo Enderle).
JULQGLQJ DSSOLFDWLRQ WKH VSHFLÀF HQHUJ\ UHTXLUHG FDQ RIWHQ EH UHGXFHG VXEVWDQWLDOO\
'HFUHDVLQJJULQGLQJEHDGVL]HUHGXFHVWKHVWUHVVHQHUJ\RIHDFKLPSDFWEXWLQFUHDVHV
WKHQXPEHURILPSDFWVLQDJLYHQJULQGLQJYROXPHWKDWLVLWLQFUHDVHVWKHVWUHVVUDWH
)RUH[DPSOHWRFUXVKDVROLGEORFNZLWKDKDPPHURQHFRXOGVHOHFWIURPYDULRXVVL]HV
RIKDPPHUDVUHSUHVHQWHGLQ)LJXUH
FIG 8.3 – Crushing a solid block with a hammer (image courtesy Dr Stefan Mende).
$KDPPHUWKDWLVWRRVPDOOZRXOGRQO\WUDQVIHUHQRXJKHQHUJ\WRNQRFNVPDOOFRUQHUV
DQG HGJHV RII WKH EORFN WKHUH ZRXOG QRW EH HQRXJK HQHUJ\ WUDQVIHUUHG WR FDXVH D
IUDFWXUHWKURXJKWKHHQWLUHEORFN7KLVPHDQVWKDWDPLQLPXPVWUHVVHQHUJ\LVUHTXLUHG
WRDGYDQFHWKHFUXVKLQJSURFHVV,IDODUJHVOHGJHKDPPHULVXVHGIRUWKLVH[SHULPHQW
WKHEORFNZRXOGFHUWDLQO\EHFUXVKHG6HYHUDOIUDFWXUHVZRXOGSUREDEO\EHWULJJHUHGLQ
DGGLWLRQWRWKHSULPDU\IUDFWXUHKRZHYHULWLVOLNHO\WKDWWKHWDEOHRQZKLFKWKHEORFN
ZDVVLWWLQJZRXOGDOVREHGDPDJHG7KLVLOOXVWUDWHVWKDWWKHVHOHFWLRQRIJULQGLQJEHDGV
WKDW DUH WRR ODUJH OHDGV WR WUDQVIHUULQJ PRUH VWUHVV HQHUJ\ WKDQ LV UHTXLUHG WR WULJJHU
EUHDNDJH7KHH[FHVVHQHUJ\FDQQRWEHVWRUHGVRLVFRQYHUWHGWRKHDWDQGDVDUXOHWR
LQFUHDVHGZHDURQWKHJULQGLQJPHGLDDQGWKHPDFKLQH
2SWLPXP UHVXOWV FDQ EH H[SHFWHG ZKHQ WKH VWUHVV HQHUJ\ WUDQVIHUUHG URXJKO\
FRUUHVSRQGVWRWKHPLQLPXPDPRXQWRIHQHUJ\UHTXLUHGWRWULJJHUEUHDNDJH6HOHFWLQJ
WKH RSWLPXP JULQGLQJ PHGLD VL]H UHVXOWV LQ D VWUHVV UDWH DW ZKLFK HYHU\ VWUHVV HYHQW
HIIHFWLYHO\ WULJJHUV SDUWLFOH EUHDNDJH 8QGHUVWDQGLQJ VWUHVV HQHUJ\ VWUHVV UDWH DQG
VSHFLÀFHQHUJ\DUHLPSRUWDQWZKHQGHVLJQLQJPLOOVIRUXOWUDÀQHJULQGLQJ
Classifier wheels
,Q GU\ SURFHVVLQJ D FODVVLÀHU VHSDUDWHV FRPPLQXWHG SDUWLFOHV LQWR FRDUVH DQG ÀQH
VWUHDPVDFFRUGLQJWRWKHEDODQFHRIWZRIRUFHVDGUDJIRUFHGXHWRSDUWLFOHPRWLRQLQ
DLUDQGDQLQHUWLDOIRUFHGXHWRWKHURWDWLRQRIDFODVVLÀHUZKHHO7KHVLPSOHVWIRUPRID
FODVVLÀHUZKHHOFRQVLVWVRIWKHKXEWKHYDQHVDQGWKHFRYHUSODWHDVVKRZQLQ)LJXUH
7KHKXEDQGFRYHUSODWHDUHDUUDQJHGLQSDUDOOHOZKLOHDODUJHQXPEHURIYDQHVDUH
PRXQWHGUDGLDOO\RQWKHRXWHUGLDPHWHURIWKHFODVVLÀHUZKHHO7KHVHSDUDWLRQHIÀFLHQF\
RIDFODVVLÀHULPSURYHVZLWKDQLQFUHDVHGQXPEHURIYDQHV7KHVSHHGRIWKHFODVVLÀHU
ZKHHODQGLWVSHULSKHUDOVSHHGGHWHUPLQHWKHPD[LPXPSDUWLFOHVL]HRIWKHÀQHPDWHULDO
FIG 8.4 – Classifier wheel showing the hub (bottom disk), the cover
plate (top disk) and the vanes (image courtesy Udo Enderle).
PHFKDQLFDO FODVVLÀHU PLOO WKH FUXVKLQJ HQHUJ\ LQVLGH WKH ÁXLGLVHG EHG MHW PLOO LV
VXSSOLHGE\JDVMHWV,QWKLVXQLWWKHSDUWLFOHVDUHDFFHOHUDWHGLQWKHMHWVWUHDPDQGFROOLGH
ZLWKRWKHUVORZHUSDUWLFOHV7KH\DUHFUXVKHGRQWKHZD\WRWKHFHQWUHDVZHOODVLQWKH
FHQWUHLWVHOI*ULQGLQJLVFRPSOHWHO\DXWRJHQLFVRWKHUHLVQRZHDURQWKHJULQGLQJWRROV
)LJXUHVKRZVWKH+RVRNDZDMHWPLOOZKLFKHPERGLHVDOORIWKHVHIHDWXUHV
:LWKWKHDLUULVLQJLQWKHFHQWUHWKHSDUWLFOHVDUHWUDQVSRUWHGWRWKHFODVVLÀHUZKHHO
ZKLFKGHÁHFWVWKHSDUWLFOHVWKDWDUHWRRFRDUVHDQGRQO\SDVVHVSDUWLFOHVWKDWPHHWWKH
VHWFRQGLWLRQVFODVVLÀHUVSHHGDLUÁRZUDWH7KHLQWHUQDOFODVVLÀFDWLRQUHVXOWVLQDYHU\
VLPSOH RSHUDWLRQ ZKLOH WKH PDFKLQH GHOLYHUV FRQVWDQW SURGXFW VL]H DQG YDULDWLRQV LQ
IHHGPDQLIHVWLQFKDQJLQJWKHWKURXJKSXWUDWH7KDWLVLIIHHGLVFRDUVHURUKDUGHUDQG
WKHFLUFXODWLQJORDGLQWKHPLOOLVLQFUHDVHGWKLVZLOOLPSDFWWKURXJKSXWRIWKHPDFKLQH
FIG 8.5 – Hosokawa Alpine Air jet mill and wheel classifier (image courtesy Hosokawa Alpine).
)RUWKHWUHDWPHQWRIGU\SURGXFWVWKHÁXLGLVHGEHGMHWPLOOFXUUHQWO\KDVWKHPRVWPRGHUQ
WHFKQRORJ\ IRU SURGXFLQJ WKH JUHDWHVW ÀQHQHVV ZLWK GHÀQHG PD[LPXP SDUWLFOH VL]H
OLPLWDWLRQ2SHUDWLQJFRPSOHWHO\ZLWKRXWPHFKDQLFDOJULQGLQJWRROVLWLVDOVRSRVVLEOH
WRSURFHVVHYHQWKHKDUGHVWSURGXFWVXSWR0RKV'HSHQGLQJRQWKHSURGXFWDQG
PDFKLQHVHWWLQJVSURGXFWVL]LQJUDQJLQJIURPPWRPFDQEHDFKLHYHG
FIG 8.6 – Nanometre scale where 1 mm = 1000 μm, 1 μm = 1000 nm (image courtesy Udo Enderle).
7KH ERWWRPXS DSSURDFK LV PRUH FRPPRQ EXW WKH WRSGRZQ DSSURDFK LV XVHG LI
V\QWKHVLV LV QRW SRVVLEOH RU WRR H[SHQVLYH 7KH +RVRNDZD $OSLQH $+0 PDFKLQH
SURGXFHVSDUWLFOHVGRZQWRQPXVLQJWKLVWRSGRZQDSSURDFK/RQJUHVLGHQFHWLPHV
DQGEHDGVLQWKHWRPPUDQJHDUHXVHGLQDKRUL]RQWDODJLWDWRUPLOODQGVXUIDFH
DFWLYHDJHQWVDUHDGGHGWRPLQLPLVHDJJORPHUDWLRQ
Tower mills
7KHÀUVWVWLUUHGPLOOVIRUJULQGLQJPLQHUDOVZHUHYHUWLFDOPLOOVZKLFKZHUHGHYHORSHG
LQ -DSDQ DERXW 7KHVH PLOOV ZHUH GHVFULEHG DV WRZHU PLOOV DQG LQ WKH RULJLQDO
WRZHUPLOOWKHPLQHUDOVOXUU\DQGVPDOOEDOOVZHUHVWLUUHGE\DYHUWLFDODJLWDWRUVFUHZ
7KH SDUWLFOHSDUWLFOH DQG SDUWLFOHEDOO FRQWDFWV WKDW RFFXUUHG FDXVHG EUHDNDJH E\
DEUDVLRQDQGDWWULWLRQSURGXFLQJYHU\VPDOOSDUWLFOHV)RU\HDUVWKHPDLQXVHRIWRZHU
PLOOVZDVWRJULQGOLPHVWRQHIRUQHXWUDOLVLQJDFLGLFSXOSVEXWLQ&RPLQFRLQ%ULWLVK
&ROXPELD&DQDGDVWDUWHGXVLQJWKHPWRJULQGÀQHJUDLQHGOHDG]LQFRUHVWRVL]HVWKDW
FRXOGQRWEHDFKLHYHGE\EDOOPLOOVWRLPSURYHPLQHUDOOLEHUDWLRQ7KLVZDVVXFFHVVIXO
DQGVWLUUHGPLOOVQRZGRPLQDWHÀQHJULQGLQJWHFKQRORJ\
7RZHUPLOOVZLWKPPEDOOVZHUHIRXQGWRJULQGPPSDUWLFOHVRIKDUGURFNPP
SDUWLFOHVRIVRIWURFNWROHVVWKDQP²ZKLFKZDVÀQHUWKDQSURGXFWVIURPFRQYHQWLRQDO
EDOOPLOOV²DQGHQHUJ\FRQVXPSWLRQZDVUHGXFHGE\²SHUFHQW7KHRULJLQDOPLOOV
DUH QRZ PDUNHWHG ZLWK WKH EUDQG QDPH 7RZHU0LOO E\ WKH (LULFK JURXS LQ *HUPDQ\
0LOO KHLJKWV LQFOXGLQJ WKH VWLUULQJ PHFKDQLVPV DUH WR P DOWKRXJK WKH JULQGLQJ
FKDPEHUVDUHDERXWKDOIWKLVKHLJKW0RWRUVUDQJHIURPWRN:6RPHGHWDLOVRI
WKHWRZHUPLOODUHVKRZQLQ)LJXUH
A B C
FIG 8.7 – Eirich TowerMill (image courtesy Eirich). (A) TowerMill, (B) material flow, (C) components.
Vertimill®
9HUWLPLOOV DUH PDGH E\ 0HWVR DQG RSHUDWH RQ WKH VDPH SULQFLSOH DV WKH RULJLQDO WRZHU
PLOO7KHVFUHZLQHDFK9HUWLPLOOVWLUVWKHJULQGLQJEDOOVDQGVOXUU\DWDFRQVWDQWVSHHG
9HUWLPLOOVDUHPDGHLQPDQ\VL]HVZLWKPRWRUVIURPWRN:0LOOKHLJKWVLQFOXGLQJ
WKHGULYHFRPSRQHQWVDUHIURPWRPRIZKLFKDSSUR[LPDWHO\²SHUFHQWLV
WKH JULQGLQJ FKDPEHU GHSHQGLQJ RQ WKH PRGHO 0LOO GLDPHWHUV DUH IURP DERXW WR
P7KH9HUWLPLOOLVHTXLSSHGZLWK2UHEHGPDJQHWLFOLQHUVZKLFKW\SLFDOO\ODVWIRUWKH
OLIHWLPHRIWKHPLOODVWKHJULQGLQJPHGLDZLOOIRUPDFRQWLQXRXVVHOIUHQHZLQJZHDUOD\HU
SURWHFWLQJWKHOLQHUVDQGWKHPLOOVKHOO)LJXUHVKRZVD9HUWLPLOODQGWKHPL[LQJDXJHU
7KHRQO\UHJXODUZHDULWHPVRQD9HUWLPLOOLQDGGLWLRQWRWKHJULQGLQJPHGLDDUHWKH
OLQHUV ZKLFK PXVW EH UHSODFHG ZKHQ ZHDU LV VHYHUH 7KHVH DUH ODUJH FXUYHG OLQHUV
DQGGHYLFHVKDYHEHHQGHYHORSHGE\5XVVHOO0LQHUDO(TXLSPHQW50(WRPHFKDQLVH
UHOLQLQJZKHUHWKHZHLJKWRIWKHOLQHUKDVFDSDFLWLHVRIDQGNJ
0LOOOLQHUVUHOLQLQJKDQGOHUVDQGUHOLQLQJPDFKLQHVZLOOEHGLVFXVVHGLQ&KDSWHU
FIG 8.8 – Vertimill showing mill component (left) and mixing auger (right) (images courtesy Metso).
HIGmill
7KH+,*PLOOLVSURGXFHGE\2XWRWHF7KHVHPLOOVKDYHEHHQXVHGVXFFHVVIXOO\IRU\HDUV
LQ ÀQHJULQGLQJ DSSOLFDWLRQV IRU OLPHVWRQH DQG LQGXVWULDO PLQHUDOV 7KH\ FRPSULVH
DYHUWLFDOPLOOERG\DVKDIWZLWKJULQGLQJGLVFVVKHOOPRXQWHGFRXQWHUULQJVDQGD
JHDUER[DQGGULYH8SWRSHUFHQWRIWKHJULQGLQJFKDPEHULVÀOOHGZLWKJULQGLQJ
EHDGV5RWDWLQJGLVFVVWLUWKHFKDUJHDQGXSWRGLVFVFDQEHXVHGLQWKHFKDPEHU
GHSHQGLQJRQWKHDSSOLFDWLRQ)HHGVOXUU\LVSXPSHGLQWRWKHPLOODWWKHERWWRPDQG
JULQGLQJRFFXUVE\DWWULWLRQDVLWPRYHVXSWKURXJKFRQVHFXWLYHJULQGLQJVWDJHV7KH
SURGXFW LV GLVFKDUJHG DW WKH WRS RI WKH PDFKLQH ZKHUH LW LV FODVVLÀHG +,*PLOOV DUH
XVHGWRPDNHSURGXFWVRIOHVVWKDQP*ULQGLQJEHDGVDUHFHUDPLFRUVWHHODQG
EHDGVL]HLVLQWKHUDQJHRI²PPGHSHQGLQJRQFDQGP&KDPEHUYROXPHVDUH
IURP/WR/ZLWKGULYHVIURPN:WR0:)LJXUHSUHVHQWVGHWDLOV
RI WKH +,*PLOO LQFOXGLQJ W\SLFDO SDUWLFOH VL]H GLVWULEXWLRQV 36'V 1LQH ð P:
PLOOVDUHFXUUHQWO\RSHUDWLQJLQWKHFDOFLXPFDUERQDWHLQGXVWU\ZKHUHWKHVKDUS36'
WKH\SURGXFHLVQHFHVVDU\7KUHHðP:PLOOVKDYHEHHQVROGWRWKHKDUGURFNPLQLQJ
LQGXVWU\IRUDW\SLFDOFRSSHUUHJULQGSURMHFWLQWKH$PHULFDVZKHUHWKHVKDUS36'LV
DQDGYDQWDJH
A B C
,/'ŵŝůůW^
ϭϬϬ
&ĞĞĚ
ϴϬ WƌŽĚƵĐƚ
WĂƐƐŝŶŐ;йͿ
ϲϬ
ϰϬ
ϮϬ
Ϭ
Ϭ͘ϭ ϭ ϭϬ ϭϬϬ ϭϬϬϬ
WĂƌƚŝĐůĞ^ŝnjĞ;ŵŝĐƌŽŶͿ
FIG 8.9 – Outotec HIGmill (images courtesy Outotec). (A) External view, (B) grinding discs, (C) typical feed and product sizings.
7KH 0: PDFKLQHV DUH P KLJK DQG P LQ GLDPHWHU %HFDXVH RI WKH WDOO DQG
QDUURZYHUWLFDOPLOOERG\DUUDQJHPHQWJULQGLQJPHGLDLVHYHQO\GLVWULEXWHGDQGPLQHUDO
SDUWLFOHVUHPDLQLQFRQVWDQWFRQWDFWVLJQLÀFDQWO\LQFUHDVLQJJULQGLQJHIÀFLHQF\7KHLU
PDLQXVHLVIRUJULQGLQJOLPHVWRQHDQGRWKHUVRIWPLQHUDOVFRQWDLQLQJXSWRSHUFHQW
6L2WRDSURGXFWVL]HRIP7KH\KDYHUHFHQWO\VLQFHEHHQXVHGIRUFRDUVHU
JULQGV DQG IRU UHJULQGLQJ RUH FRQFHQWUDWHV WR LPSURYH OLEHUDWLRQ DQG LQFUHDVH ZDVWH
UHMHFWLRQ 7KH FDVLQJ LV ÁDQJHG YHUWLFDOO\ VR LW FDQ EH VSOLW GRZQ WKH FHQWUH LQWR WZR
KDOYHVWKDWFDQEHPRYHGDSDUWRQDUDLOLQJV\VWHP&KDQJLQJGLVFVDQGOLQHUVHJPHQWV
DVWKH\ZHDUFDQEHGRQHE\WZRVNLOOHGWUDGHSHUVRQQHO7KHW\SLFDOSURGXFWVL]LQJV
EDVHGRQIHHGVL]LQJIRUWKHVHPLOOVLVSUHVHQWHGLQ7DEOH
TABLE 8.1
Feed and product sizings for Outotec’s HIGmill.
Grind classification Feed (F80 μm) Product (P80 μm)
Coarse 100–300 50–100
Fine 50–100 20–60
Ultra-fine <70 <20
ZLWK EHDG VL]H ² PP FDQ EH XVHG IRU YHU\ ÀQH SURGXFW DQG VRIW DSSOLFDWLRQV
VXFK DV OLPHVWRQH ZLWK SURGXFW d P
• LQHUW FHUDPLF PHGLD FDQ EH XVHG
7KH YHUWLFDO (L6$ PLOO LV SULFHG EHORZ WKH KRUL]RQWDO ,VD0LOO EHFDXVH LW GRHV QRW
UHTXLUH D VHDOLQJ V\VWHP ,WV GLVDGYDQWDJHV LQ FRPPRQ ZLWK RWKHU YHUWLFDO PLOOV DUH
SRRU DFFHVV IRU PDLQWHQDQFH DQG D KLJKVWDUWLQJ WRUTXH UHTXLUHPHQW /LNH RWKHU KLJK
VSHHG VWLUUHG PLOOV ZLWK WKH UHFHQW H[FHSWLRQ RI WKH ,VD0LOO WKLV OLPLWV LWV SUDFWLFDO
DSSOLFDWLRQ RQ KDUG PLQHUDOV WR XOWUDÀQH JULQGLQJ DSSOLFDWLRQV SURGXFW VL]H EHORZ
P DQG VRIWIHHG PLQHUDOV 7DEOH SUHVHQWV WKH DYDLODEOH VL]H UDQJH DQG FDSDFLWLHV
RI WKH (L6$ PLOO
TABLE 8.2
Netzsch EiSA mill.
Chamber volume (L) Power (kW) Throughput (t/h solids) Throughput (t/h water equivalent)
0–3150 90–1000 3000–35 000 3–35
OLPLW ZHDU DQG DOORZ IRU KHDW GLVVLSDWLRQ LQ WKH FDVH RI D KLJKHQHUJ\ JULQG 7KH SRZHU
LQWHQVLW\ N:P LV UHODWLYHO\ KLJK FRPSDUHG WR RWKHU PLOO W\SHV EXW LV UHTXLUHG WR
JHQHUDWH D YRUWH[ RI PHGLD DQG VOXUU\ GXULQJ RSHUDWLRQ DQG EULQJ WKH SDUWLFOHV LQ FRQWDFW
ZLWK RQH DQRWKHU IRU HIÀFLHQW JULQGLQJ KRZHYHU WKH SRZHU LQWHQVLW\ LV QRW VR KLJK WKDW
D FRROLQJ V\VWHP ZRXOG EH UHTXLUHG WR GLVVLSDWH WKH KHDW JHQHUDWHG GXULQJ D KLJK HQHUJ\
JULQG $GGLWLRQDOO\ D ORZHU SRZHU LQWHQVLW\ OLPLWV WKH VKHHU IRUFH RI WKH PHGLDVOXUU\
RQ WKH OLQHUV DQG LPSHOORUV LPSURYLQJ ZHDU OLIH
6WLUUHG PLOOV KDYH EHHQ SURYHQ WR SURYLGH HQHUJ\ VDYLQJV FRPSDUHG WR WUDGLWLRQDO EDOO
PLOOV 7KH ÀQHU WKH SURGXFW UHTXLUHG WKH PRUH HIÀFLHQW VWLUUHG PLOOV DUH WR D EDOO PLOO
7KH DWWULWLRQ JULQGLQJ DFWLRQ YHUWLFDO DUUDQJHPHQW DQG ÀQHU PHGLD VL]H GLVWULEXWLRQ
FRQWULEXWH WR PDNLQJ VWLUUHG PLOOV PRUH HQHUJ\HIÀFLHQW JULQGLQJ PDFKLQHV 7\SLFDOO\
9HUWLPLOO HQHUJ\ VDYLQJV UDQJH IURP SHU FHQW WR JUHDWHU WKDQ SHU FHQW FRPSDUHG
ZLWK WUDGLWLRQDO EDOO PLOOV DQG WKH 60' HQHUJ\ VDYLQJV DUH IDU JUHDWHU WKDQ SHU FHQW
RI EDOO PLOO HQHUJ\ IRU ÀQH JULQGV
7KH WUDQVLWLRQ IURP WRZHU PLOOV WR 60'V W\SLFDOO\ RFFXUV DW SURGXFW VL]HV EHWZHHQ
DQG P 7DEOH VXPPDULVHV WKH FKDUDFWHULVWLFV RI WKH YDULRXV YHUWLFDO VWLUUHG
PLOOV DYDLODEOH LQ WKH PDUNHWSODFH
TABLE 8.3
Vertical stirred mills.
Manufacturer Motor power (kW) Feed size (mm) Product size (<μm)
TowerMill (Nissan Ehrich) 0.4–1120 10 15
Vertimill (Metso) 11–2237 6 15
Stirred Media Detritor (Metso) 185, 355, 1100 200 5
HIGmill (Outotec) 144–5500 500 20
EiSA mill (Netzsch) 90–710 250 10
IsaMill™
7KH RQO\ KRUL]RQWDO VWLUUHG JULQGLQJ PLOO XVHG H[WHQVLYHO\ LQ WKH PLQHUDOV LQGXVWU\ QRZ
LV WKH ,VD0LOO ,W RULJLQDWHG ZLWK WKH QHHG WR OLEHUDWH WKH VXOÀGHV LQ WKH YHU\ ÀQHJUDLQHG
OHDG]LQF RUHV WKDW 0RXQW ,VD 0LQHV 0,0 ZDV PLQLQJ DW 0RXQW ,VD DQG 0F$UWKXU
5LYHU 1RUWKHUQ 7HUULWRU\ 7XPEOLQJ PLOOV IDLOHG WR JULQG ÀQHO\ HQRXJK DQG \LHOGHG
SRRU ÁRWDWLRQ FRQFHQWUDWHV 0,0 DQG 1HW]VFK &RUSRUDWLRQ DGDSWHG WKH KLJKVSHHG
EDWFK VWLUUHG PLOOV ² XVHG WR JULQG SLJPHQWV ² WR FRQWLQXRXV PLOOV VXLWDEOH IRU KDUG
RUHV DQG QDPHG WKH QHZ PLOO WKH ,VD0LOO $W 0F$UWKXU 5LYHU WKH LQVWDOODWLRQ KDG IRXU
0V 0: HDFK WR JULQG EHORZ P (QGHUOH et al 6LQFH LWV GHYHORSPHQW
DW 0RXQW ,VD LQ LW KDV EHHQ ZLGHO\ DGRSWHG IRU D UDQJH RI PLQHUDO JULQGLQJ
DSSOLFDWLRQV ZRUOGZLGH $IWHU LWV RULJLQDO GHYHORSPHQW IRU XOWUDÀQH JULQGLQJ LW ZDV
IXUWKHU GHYHORSHG LQ WHUPV RI VFDOH DQG WKH DELOLW\ WR SURGXFH FRDUVHU JULQGV 6LQFH WKH
HDUO\ V LW KDV EHHQ DSSOLHG LQ FRQYHQWLRQDO JULQGLQJ DQG UHJULQGLQJ DSSOLFDWLRQV
ZLWK SURGXFW VL]HV DERYH P ZKLFK ZHUH QRW SUHYLRXVO\ FRQVLGHUHG WKH GRPDLQ RI
KLJKVSHHG VWLUUHG PLOOV
7KH ,VD0LOO LV D KLJKLQWHQVLW\ VWLUUHG PLOO XVLQJ VPDOO PHGLD VWLUUHG DW JUHDW VSHHG WR
FRPELQH KLJK HQHUJ\ HIÀFLHQF\ ZLWK KLJK EUHDNDJH UDWHV 7KH GLVWLQJXLVKLQJ IHDWXUHV
RI WKH ,VD0LOO DUH WKH KRUL]RQWDO FRQÀJXUDWLRQ WKH KLJKSRZHU LQWHQVLW\ WKH LQWHUQDO
FODVVLÀHU WKDW DFKLHYHV D VKDUS SURGXFW VL]H GLVWULEXWLRQ DQG WKH XVH RI LQHUW PHGLD
$V RI SHU FHQW RI LQVWDOOHG ,VD0LOOV DUH WDUJHWLQJ SURGXFW JULQG VL]HV RI P
EHWZHHQ DQG PLFURQV PRVWO\ RQ KDUG PLQHUDOV VXFK DV VSKDOHULWH S\ULWH DQG
JDOHQD
Operating principles
7KH ,VD0LOO VKRZQ LQ )LJXUH LV D KRUL]RQWDOO\ VWLUUHG PLOO FRQVLVWLQJ RI D VHULHV
RI VHYHQ WR HLJKW URWDWLQJ JULQGLQJ GLVFV PRXQWHG RQ D FDQWLOHYHUHG VKDIW LW LV GULYHQ
WKURXJK D PRWRU DQG JHDUER[ 7KH GLVFV RSHUDWH DW WLS VSHHGV RI ² PV UHVXOWLQJ LQ
HQHUJ\ LQWHQVLWLHV RI XS WR N:P
)LJXUH VKRZV WKH SULQFLSOH RI RSHUDWLRQ 7KH VKHOO LV VWDWLRQDU\ DQG WKH PLOO LV ÀOOHG
ZLWK D VXLWDEOH JULQGLQJ PHGLD 7KH DUHD EHWZHHQ HDFK GLVF LV HVVHQWLDOO\ DQ LQGLYLGXDO
JULQGLQJ FKDPEHU VR DV D UHVXOW WKH PLOO LV HIIHFWLYHO\ HLJKW JULQGLQJ FKDPEHUV LQ VHULHV
7KH PHGLD LV VHW LQ PRWLRQ E\ WKH DFWLRQ RI WKH JULQGLQJ GLVFV ZKLFK UDGLDOO\ DFFHOHUDWH
WKH PHGLD WRZDUGV WKH VKHOO %HWZHHQ WKH GLVFV ZKHUH WKH PHGLD LV QRW VXEMHFW WR WKH
KLJK RXWZDUGV DFFHOHUDWLRQ RI WKH GLVF IDFH WKH PHGLD LV IRUFHG EDFN LQ WRZDUGV WKH
VKDIW FUHDWLQJ D FLUFXODWLRQ RI PHGLD EHWZHHQ HDFK VHW RI GLVFV 7KH JULQGLQJ PHFKDQLVP
ZLWKLQ WKH ,VD0LOO LV RQH RI DWWULWLRQ DQG DEUDVLRQ ZKHUH SDUWLFOH VXUIDFHV DUH FKLSSHG
UHSHDWHGO\ 7KLV EUHDNDJH PRGH SURGXFHV YHU\ ÀQHVL]HG SDUWLFOHV DW D UHODWLYHO\ ORZ
SRZHU FRQVXPSWLRQ GXH WR WKH KLJK SUREDELOLW\ RI PHGLD²SDUWLFOH FROOLVLRQ
7KH HLJKW FKDPEHUV LQ VHULHV HQVXUH WKDW VKRUW FLUFXLWLQJ RI PLOO IHHG WR WKH GLVFKDUJH
LV YLUWXDOO\ LPSRVVLEOH 7KHUH LV D YHU\ KLJK SUREDELOLW\ RI PHGLD²SDUWLFOH FROOLVLRQ DV D
UHVXOW RI WKH KLJKHQHUJ\ LQWHQVLW\ DQG WKH HLJKW FKDPEHUV LQ VHULHV 7KH UHVLGHQFH WLPH
LQ WKH ,VD0LOO LV TXLWH VKRUW FRPSDUHG ZLWK RWKHU JULQGLQJ PLOOV ² W\SLFDOO\ DURXQG WR
VHFRQGV 7KLV FDQ KDYH DGYDQWDJHV LQ GRZQVWUHDP SURFHVVLQJ ZKHUH FOHDQ PLQHUDO
VXUIDFHV DUH SURGXFHG DQG TXLFNO\ SDVVHG WR WKH QH[W VWDJH RI SUHSDUDWLRQ
Energy intensity
7KH KLJK WLS VSHHG RI WKH ,VD0LOO UHVXOWV LQ D KLJKHQHUJ\LQWHQVLYH HQYLURQPHQW
(QHUJ\ LQWHQVLW\ RI WKH ,VD0LOO LV VLJQLÀFDQWO\ KLJKHU WKDQ DQ\ RWKHU FRPPHUFLDOO\
DYDLODEOH JULQGLQJ HTXLSPHQW DV VKRZQ LQ 7DEOH &RPELQLQJ WKH HQHUJ\ LQWHQVLW\
DQG WKH KLJKJULQGLQJ HIÀFLHQF\ OHDGV WR D FRPSDFW PLOO WKDW FDQ ÀW LQWR H[LVWLQJ
SODQWV ZKHUH ÁRRU VSDFH DQG FUDQDJH LV OLPLWHG 0LOOV FDQ EH GLVWULEXWHG WKURXJKRXW
WKH SURFHVVLQJ FLUFXLW DW WKH SRLQWV ZKHUH PLQHUDO OLEHUDWLRQ LV QHHGHG UDWKHU WKDQ
FHQWUDOLVHG LQ WKH JULQGLQJ FLUFXLW
Energy efficiency
7KH HQHUJ\ HIÀFLHQF\ RI WKH ,VD0LOO LV GXH WR LWV DELOLW\ WR XVH VPDOO PHGLD ZKLFK UHVXOWV
IURP VWLUULQJ PHGLD DW D KLJKHU VSHHG 6PDOOHU PHGLD JLYHV KLJKHU JULQGLQJ HIÀFLHQF\
GXH WR WKH KLJKHU VXUIDFH DUHD DYDLODEOH IRU JULQGLQJ 7DEOH +RZHYHU WKHUH DUH
WKUHH SUDFWLFDO OLPLWV WR XVLQJ VPDOO PHGLD WKH KLJK FRVW WKH DELOLW\ WR EUHDN WKH IHHG DW
DQ DGHTXDWH UDWH DQG WKH DELOLW\ WR UHWDLQ WKH PHGLD ZKLOH GLVFKDUJLQJ WKH SURGXFW
,VD0LOO DGGUHVVHV WKHVH WKUHH FRQVWUDLQWV E\ HPSOR\LQJ FHUDPLF PHGLD KLJKVSHHG
VWLUULQJ WR JHW KLJK EUHDNDJH UDWHV DQG WKH LQWHUQDO FHQWULIXJDO VHSDUDWRU
7KH VHSDUDWRU LV DW WKH GLVFKDUJH HQG RI WKH ,VD0LOO *URXQG VOXUU\ H[LWV WKH FHQWUH RI
WKH VHSDUDWRU DQG PHGLD LV FHQWULIXJHG WR WKH VKHOO DQG SXPSHG EDFN ZLWK VRPH RI WKH
VOXUU\ WR WKH IHHG HQG RI WKH PLOO 7KLV DFWLRQ UHWDLQV PHGLD LQ WKH PLOO ZLWKRXW WKH QHHG
IRU ÀQH VFUHHQV 7DEOH SUHVHQWV WKH FKDUDFWHULVWLFV RI WKH UDQJH RI ,VD0LOOV
TABLE 8.4
Comparative energy intensity of grinding technologies.
Mill type Installed power (kW) Mill volume (m³) Power intensity (kW/m³)
Autogenous mill 6400 353 18
Primary ball mill 2600 126 21
Regrind ball mill 740 39 19
Tower mill 1000 12 42
HIGmill 4378 27 160
IsaMill™ 3000 10 300
TABLE 8.5
Comparison of media size for different grinding methods.
Mill type Media size (mm) Number of media/m³ Media surface area (m2/m3)
Ball 20 177 000 222
Tower 12 818 000 370
IsaMill 2 176 500 000 2200
TABLE 8.6
Horizontal stirred mill – IsaMill.
Volume Power Capacity Feed size range Product size Power intensity
(L) (kW) (t/h) (mm) range (μm) (kW/m3)
100 75 8 <1 5–50 750
500 200 25 <1 5–50 400
1000 500 50 <1 5–50 500
5000 1500 150 <1 5–80 300
10 000 3000 300 <1 5–100 300
50 000 8000 800 <1 30–150 160
There is no such thing as a universal mill that optimally meets every requirement in terms
oI Àneness throughput energy eIÀciency Zear contaminationIree grinding and cleaning
etc For this reason $lpine oIIers a Zide spectrum oI diIIerent designs Zhich enaEles an
optimal solution to Ee Iound Ior each proElem speciÀcation +RVRNDZD $OSLQH
$OSLQH ODWHU +RVRNDZD $OSLQH KDV SURGXFHG WHQV RI WKRXVDQGV RI ÀQHJULQGLQJ PLOOV
DQG URWDU\ JUDQXODWRUV IRU SODVWLF UHF\FOLQJ IRU PRUH WKDQ \HDUV 'XULQJ WKH ODVW IHZ
GHFDGHV WKH FRPSDQ\ KDV VSHFLDOLVHG LQ ÀQHJULQGLQJ DSSOLFDWLRQV VPDOOHU WKDQ P
+RVRNDZD $OSLQH SURGXFHV PLOOV DQG FODVVLÀHUV IRU WKH SURGXFWLRQ RI PLQHUDO ÀOOHUV
:KLOH \HDUV DJR D ÀOOHU ZLWK D VL]H SHU FHQW SDVVLQJ P ZDV UHJDUGHG DV YHU\
ÀQH WRGD\ D VL]H RI P LV D VWDQGDUG UHTXLUHPHQW DQG VRPH SURGXFWV HYHQ KDYH D VL]H
RI P $V WKHVH ÀQH ÀOOHUV DUH JHQHUDOO\ XVHG DV GU\ SRZGHUV LW LV HVVHQWLDO WR XVH D GU\
ÀQHJULQGLQJ SURFHVV $ ZLGH YDULHW\ RI GLIIHUHQW DLU FODVVLÀHUV DUH DYDLODEOH WR DFKLHYH
WKHVH ÀQH VL]HV LQ GU\ JULQGLQJ SURFHVVHV
7KH PLOOV DQG FODVVLÀHUV DUH GLVFXVVHG LQ WKH +andEooN oI PoZder and Particle Processing
+RVRNDZD $OSLQH 7KUHH PLOOV WKDW DUH SDUWLFXODUO\ UHOHYDQW WR KLJKFDSDFLW\
PLQHUDO SODQWV ZLOO EH GLVFXVVHG LQ WKLV VHFWLRQ
FIG 8.14 – Horizontal stirred wet AHM mill and stirrer (images courtesy Hosokawa Alpine).
TABLE 8.7
Horizontal stirred Hosokawa Alpine AHM ball mill.
Chamber volume (L) Power (kW) Throughput (t/h)
5 7.5 0.01–0.05
17 22 0.04–0.2
65 45 0.08–0.4
132 75 0.15–0.8
221 110 0.2–1
516 200 0.4–2
1056 316 0.6–3
SHU FHQW SDVVLQJ P DQG LV FRDUVHU IRU ZHW JULQGLQJ 7KH RSHUDWLQJ PRGH DQG
GHVLJQ RI WKH $15 PLOO SHUPLW WKH SURGXFWLRQ RI KLJKTXDOLW\ OLPHVWRQH ZLWK UHJDUG WR
ÀQHQHVV GHJUHH RI ZKLWHQHVV DQG DEUDVLYHQHVV ,Q JHQHUDO WKH VOXUU\ LV GLUHFWO\ XVHG LQ
SDSHU SURGXFWLRQ
7KH ÁRZ SDWWHUQ WKURXJK WKH YHUWLFDOO\ FRQÀJXUHG $15 LV IURP ERWWRP WR WRS ZKHUHE\
WKH IHHG PDWHULDO LV JURXQG WR WKH UHTXLUHG ÀQH VL]LQJ ZLWK WKH DLG RI FHUDPLF JULQGLQJ
EHDGV ]LUFRQLXP VLOLFDWH RU ]LUFRQLXP R[LGH DV VKRZQ LQ )LJXUH 7KH JULQGLQJ
EHDGV DUH VHSDUDWHG IURP WKH GLVFKDUJLQJ VXVSHQVLRQ DW WKH PLOO KHDG 7KH ORZ
VSHHG DJLWDWRU HQVXUHV DQ H[FHHGLQJO\ ORZHQHUJ\ JULQGLQJ SURFHVV DW ORZ ZHDU UDWHV
DQG KLJK PLOO VHUYLFH OLIH DQG FRUUHVSRQGLQJO\ ORZ WKURXJKSXW UDWH FRPSDUHG ZLWK
PLQLQJ DSSOLFDWLRQV 7KH DJLWDWRU HOHPHQWV DQG WKH JULQGLQJ FKDPEHU ZDOO DUH PDGH
RI ZHDUUHVLVWDQW KDUGHQHG PDWHULDOV (IÀFLHQW FRROLQJ RI WKH PLOO VWDWRU UHPRYHV WKH
KHDW JHQHUDWHG GXULQJ JULQGLQJ 7KH JHRPHWU\ RI WKH PLOO SHUPLWV WURXEOHIUHH VFDOHXS
WR KLJK SURGXFWLRQVFDOH FDSDFLWLHV 7KH SURGXFW OLQH LQFOXGHV VPDOO SLORW PDFKLQHV RI
N: DQG SURGXFWLRQVFDOH PLOOV XS WR N: 7KH VSHFLÀF JULQGLQJ HQHUJLHV IRU
JURXQG FDOFLXP FDUERQDWH ÀOOHU ZKHQ WKHUH LV DSSUR[LPDWHO\ SHU FHQW SDVVLQJ P
LQ WKH IHHG DUH
• SHU FHQW SDVVLQJ P ² N:KW
• SHU FHQW SDVVLQJ P ² N:KW
• SHU FHQW SDVVLQJ P ² N:KW
$ W\SLFDO PLOO ZLWK D PP GLDPHWHU DQG N: GULYH ZLOO SURGXFH ² WK RI
SHU FHQW SDVVLQJ P SURGXFW
FIG 8.15 – Wet agitated ball mill ANR – schematic and production scale mill (images courtesy Hosokawa Alpine).
FIG 8.16 – Hosokawa Alpine dry vertical stirred ATR mill and the mill mechanism (images courtesy Hosokawa Alpine).
PLFURQV DQG JULQGLQJ EHDGV DUH LQWURGXFHG IURP DERYH $ GLVFKDUJH VFUHZ DW WKH
ORZHU HQG RI WKH PLOO H[WUDFWV JULQGLQJ EHDGV DQG SURGXFW ZKHUH WKH JULQGLQJ EHDGV DUH
VHSDUDWHG DQG UHWXUQHG WR WKH PLOO
3URGXFW VL]LQJ LV DV ÀQH DV SHU FHQW SDVVLQJ P ZKHQ WKH PLOO LV RSHUDWHG LQ FORVHG
FLUFXLW ZLWK DQ DLU FODVVLÀHU 7KH HQHUJ\ LQWHQVLW\ LV DSSUR[LPDWHO\ N:Pó DQG WKH
FDSDFLW\ LV KLJK LQ UHODWLRQ WR PDFKLQH VL]H 0LOO VL]H UDQJHV IURP D URWRU GLDPHWHU RI
PP WR PP WKH PLOO KHLJKW IURP WR P DQG WKH RYHUDOO KHLJKW IURP WR
P 7KH LQVWDOOHG SRZHUV DUH XS WR N: 7\SLFDO DSSOLFDWLRQV DUH OLPHVWRQH TXDUW]
DQG RWKHU KDUG PDWHULDOV
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Enderle, 8 :RRGDOO 3 'XII\ 0 DQG -RKQVRQ 1 : 6WLUUHG PLOO WHFKQRORJ\ IRU UHJULQGLQJ
0F$UWKXU 5LYHU DQG 0RXQW ,VD ]LQFOHDG RUHV LQ Proceedings XX International Mineral
Processing Congress $DFKHQ ² 6HSWHPEHU YROXPH SS *0'% *HUPDQ\
Hosokawa Alpine, +andEooN oI PoZder and Particle Processing S
Hosokawa Alpine, )LQH LPSDFW PLOOV DQG FODVVLÀHU PLOOV >RQOLQH@ $YDLODEOH IURP KWWSV
ZZZKRVRNDZDDOSLQHFRPSRZGHUSDUWLFOHSURFHVVLQJPDFKLQHVÀQHLPSDFWPLOOVDQG
FODVVLÀHUPLOOV! >$FFHVVHG -XQH @
Kwade, $ DQG 6FKZHGHV - :HW FRPPLQXWLRQ LQ VWLUUHG PHGLD PLOOV .21$ PoZder and
Particle Journal ²
Pease, - ' <RXQJ 0 ) &XUU\ ' DQG -RKQVRQ 1 : ,PSURYLQJ ÀQHV UHFRYHU\ E\ JULQGLQJ
ÀQHU LQ Proceedings MetPlant 2004 Conference SS ² 7KH $XVWUDODVLDQ ,QVWLWXWH RI 0LQLQJ
DQG 0HWDOOXUJ\ 0HOERXUQH
Rule, & 0 6WLUUHG PLOOLQJ ² QHZ FRPPLQXWLRQ WHFKQRORJ\ LQ WKH 3*0 LQGXVWU\ The Journal
of the 6outhern $frican Institute of Mining and Metallurgy ²
Rumpf, + 3UREOHPV RI VFLHQWLÀF GHYHORSPHQW LQ SDUWLFOH WHFKQRORJ\ ORRNHG XSRQ IURP D
SUDFWLFDO SRLQW RI YLHZ PoZder Technology ²
&DWDORJXHV IRU VWLUUHG PLOOV ÀQHJULQGLQJ PLOOV UHIHUUHG WR LQ WKLV FKDSWHU DUH DYDLODEOH RQ WKH
LQWHUQHW 7KH FRPSDQLHV DUH
• (&& VDQG PLOOV (QJOLVK &KLQD &OD\ PLOOV
• +,*PLOO
• +RVRNDZD $OSLQH PLOOV
• ,VD0LOO
• 7RZHU PLOOV YHUWLFDO VWLUUHG PLOOV
• 9HUWLPLOO
Chapter 9
MILL LINERS
Spike Taylor, Matthew Fitzsimons,
Cathy Hewett and John Russell
FIG 9.1 – Shell cracking that may develop with inadequate lining (image courtesy Metso).
/LQHUVSURYLGHWKHVDFULÀFLDOOD\HURIZHDUUHVLVWDQWVXUIDFHVLQPLOOV7KH\DUHXVXDOO\
PDGH RI VWHHO UXEEHU RU VWHHOFDSSHG UXEEHU DOVR NQRZQ DV FRPSRVLWH 5XEEHU
SURGXFWVDUHDWWUDFWLYHEHFDXVHRIWKHLUORZZHLJKWEXWWKH\FDQQRWEHXVHGDWWKHKLJK
WHPSHUDWXUHVWKDWRFFXULQFHPHQWPLOOVRULQYHU\ODUJHPLOOVDVWKHIRUFHVDUHWRRJUHDW
IRUWKHUXEEHUWRZLWKVWDQG
/LQHUVLQRUHJULQGLQJPLOOVDUHGHVLJQHGZLWKWKUHHREMHFWLYHV
SURWHFWWKHVKHOODQGWKHHQGVRIWKHPLOOIURPZHDURUGDPDJH
WUDQVIHUHQHUJ\HIÀFLHQWO\IURPWKHPRWRULQWRWKHPDVVRIRUHDQGJULQGLQJPHGLDVR
WKDWRUHEUHDNDJHLVRSWLPLVHG
UHPRYHWKHJURXQGFRQWHQWVHIÀFLHQWO\IURPWKHPLOODWWKHGLVFKDUJHHQG
7KH FRQÁLFWLQJ UHTXLUHPHQWV RI WKH OLQHU WR ERWK SURWHFW WKH PLOO VKHOO IURP LPSDFW
DQG ZHDU DQG WUDQVIHU URWDWLRQDO HQHUJ\ RI WKH PLOO WR WKH PHGLD DQG FKDUJH QHHG
WR EH FDUHIXOO\ EDODQFHG $Q H[DPSOH ZRXOG EH GHVLJQLQJ DQG LQVWDOOLQJ ODUJHU RU
WKLFNHU OLQHUV WR LQFUHDVH WKH OLQHU OLIH ZKLFK ZRXOG UHGXFH WKH PLOO YROXPH DQG
WKURXJKSXW 7KHUH DUH PDQ\ YDULDEOHV WKDW FDQ VLJQLÀFDQWO\ DIIHFW PLOO OLQHU GHVLJQ
DQG SRRU OLQHU GHVLJQ FDQ KDYH D GHWULPHQWDO HIIHFW RQ ERWK PLOOLQJ SHUIRUPDQFH
DQG OLQHU OLIH /LQHU GHVLJQ GUDZV SULPDULO\ RQ SUDFWLFDO H[SHULHQFH IURP PLOOLQJ
RSHUDWLRQV DORQJ ZLWK WKH HYHUGHYHORSLQJ FRPSXWHUEDVHG PRGHOOLQJ RI FKDUJH
PRWLRQ DQG WUDMHFWRULHV DQG ODWHO\ OLQHU ZHDU DQG HQHUJ\ XVDJH 7KH UHODWLYH
RSHUDWLQJ FRVW RI OLQHUV LQ FRPPLQXWLRQ LV JLYHQ LQ )LJXUH LW YDULHV IURP
²SHUFHQWZKHQQRVWHHOEDOOVDUHXVHGWRVL[SHUFHQWZKHQVWHHOEDOOVDUHXVHG
FIG 9.2 – The operating cost of liners relative to media and energy (image courtesy Metso).
This also allows the opportunity to reduce the number of bolts per liner. These designs
provide great cost beneÀts to the operation as lost operating time reduces production
and decreases revenue.
The four important process objectives in mill liner design are 5oyston, 200:
1. providing the key between the mill charge and the mill shell for charge motion
2. maximising the rate of delivery of thrown grinding media at the toe of the charge to
gain the best milling action
3. avoiding liner and ball damage
4. providing an economic linerwear life.
Shell liner design has been driven in the past by practical operating experiences; for
example, variations of lifter heights, liner spacing and lifter angles all change variables such
as grinding ball trajectories and chargelifting rates, each of which affects mill performance.
Many types of liners are currently available, some of which are now discussed.
MATERIALS OF CONSTRUCTION
The selection of material used for mill liners is dependent on the liner design and
application conditions such as ore type, size of the mill, corrosion environment, size of
balls or ore and mill speed. The most common materials used for mill liner construction
are pearliticchromium molybdenum steel, highchromium white iron, synthetic and
natural rubber and combinations of metallic and rubber materials. General properties
and corresponding applications for each of these are given.
Pearlitic-chromium molybdenum (Cr-Mo) steel has excellent wear characteristics with good
impactabrasion resistance and is generally used for semiautogenous grinding SAG
mill liners. The carbon content is at or slightly greater than the eutectoid composition on
the ironcarbon phase diagram, resulting in a microstructure of Ànegrained pearlite with
varying amounts of hypereutectoid carbides. Pearlitic &rMo steel reTuires controlled
cooling during heat treatment to avoid the formation of hard and brittle martensite or
bainite. Pearlitic &rMo steel work hardens slightly from impact in service, resulting
in a harder surface with a softer and tougher core of the casting. Pearlitic &rMo steel
can have a hardness from 300 to 400 %rinell hardness number %+1 due to variations
of carbon and chromium contents, which can be modiÀed to increase or decrease the
hardness and toughness. A lower carbon content is used when slightly greater impact
resistance is reTuired, such as for discharge grates. A higher carbon content is used for
thinner section liners and applications with less impact that reTuire a higher hardness
for abrasion resistance.
Steel liners have been used in ball mills since they became common in the late 19th
century. They are a medium cost and are the heaviest of all designs so they reTuire a
liner handler. An indication of the market size for these liners is that &,T,&+,& in &hina
has a dedicated factory to manufacture 50 000 t/a of chrome molybdenum steel liners.
High-chromium white iron is considered to have superior abrasion and corrosion
resistance, although it is considered a brittle material. +ighchromium white iron
has a microstructure consisting of iron and alloy carbides in a matrix of tempered
martensite. The hardness, abrasion resistance and fracture toughness depend on the
speciÀc chemical composition and heat treatment used in order to control the carbide
formation as well as the matrix structure and composition. +ighchromium white iron
generally has a hardness of 00 %+1 or greater resulting in superior abrasion resistance.
The excellent abrasion resistance results in a sacriÀce of toughness, so highchromium
white iron is generally used in autogenous grinding AG mills or ball mills where high
impact resistance is not reTuired.
Fabrication of steel mill liners is a broad subject that will not be covered in this book;
however, a few points concerning production processes will be mentioned because
they are necessary to ensure good Tuality liners. The mould designs are checked for
soundness of liner product using 3D modelling packages such as MAGMASOFT®,
which simulates both the Àlling of the mould plus the solidiÀcation pattern of the
molten metal. 8ltrasonic testing still needs to be used to conÀrm the absence of porosity
inside the liners. Chemical analyses are carried out as well as heat treatment to obtain
the correct microstructure and the best through hardness. Dimensional checks need to
be done to ensure ease of Àtment during the reline.
Rubber (elastomer) mill liners are lighter in weight than metal liners and are a wear
resistant alternative Figure 9.3a. 5ubber for a mill liner should have an elongation of
450 to 00 per cent, a tensile strength of around 1.5–20 MPa and a hardness of between
55 and 0 durometer on the A scale. The properties of rubber allow rubber mill liners to
process hard ore without cracking. The sound dampening effect results in the mill being
less noisy. Installation and the removal of rubber liners is considered easier and more
Áexible due to the weight of the liners. Attachment is done by using aluminium or steel
tracks moulded into the bottom of the lifter bars, which in turn clamp the plates into
place. Forged Tbolts speciÀc to the tracks bolt the rubber lifters to the mill shell. Design
of rubber mill liners can utilise the same methods and programs.
These type of liners were introduced in the late 1930s, and are the lightest of all designs
and have a relatively low to medium cost. They are used in small to mediumsized mills
and can be installed easily. Many improvements in rubber compounds have been made
over the years; nanotechnology research should further improve wear life in the future.
SpeciÀc formulations can be used for different applications, such as a chemicalresistant
rubber for mills that have diesel added to the pulp.
Composites utilising a steel insert achieve a combination of excellent overall toughness
with abrasion resistance in particular sections of the liner Figure 9.3b. These inserts can
be CrMo castings or Tuench and tempered plate, normally 5 mm thick. An increased
wear life for chromium molybdenum steel composite liners can be achieved using high
chromium white iron inserts in lowimpact areas. Metalfaced rubber liners with designs
A B
FIG 9.3 – Mills equipped with (A) rubber and (B) composite liners (image courtesy Metso).
resistant to damage through ball impacts are growing in applications in SAG mills.
They were developed in the 1980s, and are used in medium to large mills. Their cost
lies between rubber and steel linings. The larger composite lifter bars can reTuire lifting
lugs for installation using a mill liner handler.
Fabrication of rubber mill liners is a broad subject that will not be covered in this book.
The basic process is that uncured rubber of the reTuired formulation is put into custom
designed moulds and any metal inserts are prepared by grit blasting followed by the
application of a bonding agent. The rubber is then cured at a high temperature using
high pressure to keep the mould closed. The liners are trimmed to the Ànished size in a
postmoulding stage.
Combination linings incorporating steel lifter bars and rubber shell plates can be used for
weight reduction of the overall lining. A lining can also have steel lifters and rubber grates
to overcome blinding problems associated with steel grates in certain applications. 5ubber
pulp lifters can be installed behind steel grates for weight and cost considerations.
Peening on liners
A steel surface dimpled with impact craters, often called ¶orange peel·, can sometimes
be seen on steel liners and steel inserts in composite lifter bars. This is detrimental to the
liners· performance and conseTuently their life within the mill. Liners showing this type
of surface are the result of grinding media impacting on steel liners rather than the toe of
the charge. If the mill speed is too fast, the energy imparted to the balls/ore upon release
is too high and the trajectory takes it over the toe, hitting the liners. A slower mill speed
can move the impact point back to the toe. An alternative cause of these impacts is a low
charge volume, which is often associated with the commissioning of a mill. Increasing
the mill charge volume will increase the toe size thereby moving the toe position, so
the impact position returns to the toe.
Broken/damaged liners
These can result from media impacting directly on steel liners, especially in AG/SAG
mills as the energies of impact are Tuite high because rocks are large. If this still occurs
once the impacts have been resolved, the Tuality of the castings as well as the bolting
and torTuing regimen should be checked. In the case of rubber liners, gouging wear can
be Tuite damaging to their total life. 5ubber liners should therefore be inspected closely
for signs of gouging; for example, from material such as tramp metal.
TYPES OF LINERS
the corner segment, although this edge can be a saw-toothed shape if this is the profile
of the corner segment.
A B
FIG 9.4 – The (A) top-hat and (B) rail designs are two examples of solid/integral liners (images courtesy Cathy Hewett).
FIG 9.5 – Loose plates with a bolted lifter (image courtesy Cathy Hewett).
Wave liners
Wave liners are designed for ball mills to produce a cascading charge motion (see
Figure 9.6). The safety of the design ensures that there is no overthrow of the charge, so
high-chrome white iron can be used for its hardness and abrasion resistance.
FIG 9.7 – Metso Megaliner being placed by a Russell Mineral Equipment machine (image courtesy Metso).
Loose liners
5ubber liners are generally loose sections. The lifter bars are normally unidirectional
but bidirectional lifters can be supplied. Figure 9.8 shows rubber lifter bars and a shell
plate.
FIG 9.8 – Rubber lifter bars and shell plate (image courtesy Multotec).
Lifter bars
5ubber and composite liner bars can be moulded in multiple conÀgurations designed to
suit the application Figure 9.9. 4uench and tempered plate composite liners provide
good toughness on the lifting surface. Casting insert composites provide better cover for
the top surface of the lifter bars in highenergy applications Figure 9.9.
Plate liners
5ubber plate liners, seen in Figure 9.10, can be moulded to suit any application.
Composite plate liners can be designed to improve wear life costeffectively.
Discharge liners
5ubber discharge grates Figure 9.11 can demonstrate reduced ¶pegging· – that is, hole
blockage – during operation as the apertures are more Áexible than steel grates. Composite
material can be added to the grates for additional stiffness and wear resistance if reTuired.
(DEM) packages (Powell et al, 2006). Discharge liners are designed to optimise mill
WKURXJKSXWE\FRQWUROOLQJWKHWRWDORSHQDUHDRIWKHPLOODVZHOODVGHÀQLQJDSHUWXUH
size and shape.
FIG 9.13 – HiLo lifter bar profile (image courtesy Cathy Hewett).
Ball mills
Whilst AG and SAG mills function to break large feed size, the product is relatively
coarse and generally unsuitable for downstream equipment; this is where ball mills
come into the circuits.
If the mill is failing to grind finely enough, or under-grinding the ore, the product is
coarse and may have a low degree of liberation resulting in low recoveries. If the mill is
over-grinding, the efficiency of the mill is not balanced, increasing the power draw and
ultimately the cost. There can also be downstream problems such as sliming of the pulp,
reducing the recoveries.
The ball mill liners affect the way the charge behaves and as such have a significant
impact on the mill and grind efficiencies. Within a ball mill, the main modes of grinding
are attrition and abrasion rather than impact. These comminution modes are a result of
the cascading tumbling pattern that is most prevalent in ball mills. Cascading describes
the portion of the media that rolls down to the toe of the charge resulting in abrasion
and Àner grinding, but also increased liner wear. To generate this cascading motion,
the mill liners reÁect a more corrugated design with a larger face angle on each lifter,
accentuating the tumbling motion of the charge. 5ubber mill liners are designed to
impact the toe of the charge to provide a normal charge motion.
Rod mills
5od mill liners have a very conservative proÀle to minimise the risk of rod entanglement,
with the lift from the plate section to the top of the thicker wearresistant portion being
as gentle as possible.
The feed head liners are thicker than the discharge head liners as protection against
impact when the rods are introduced into the mill via the discharge trunnion using a
rod charger.
5ubber liners can be used on the shell of a rod mill for noise and weight considerations;
however, the lifter bars must have a rounded crosssection to provide a conservative
charge action. These lifter bars have to be asymmetrical with the track towards the rear
of the lifter bar as protection against the highimpact forces of the rods. The heads still
reTuire steel liners, as rubber liners would undergo too much spearing by the rods.
Scrubbers
Scrubber liners, especially in diamond mining, are rubberlined. The traditional lifter bar
proÀle has been sTuare, even though a cascading action is essential because of the low
rotational speed of scrubbers; however, there has been a move to design faster scrubbers,
so the trajectory needs to be checked in case chamfered lifter bars are reTuired. Scoops
can be supplied to the discharge head for clearing the scrubber of the complete charge
for improved security during relines.
FIG 9.14 – Two-compartment FLSmidth cement clinker ball mill showing the centre
diaphragm and liners in the two compartments (image courtesy FLSmidth).
FIG 9.15 – Xlift® liners made by Magotteaux. Cross-section of liners showing the three
types of plates and the liners in place (images courtesy Magotteaux).
ϲϬ
ϱϬ
Averageballsize(mm)
ϰϬ
ϯϬ
ϮϬ
ϭϬ
Ϭ
Ϭ ϭ Ϯ ϯ ϰ ϱ ϲ ϳ ϴ ϵ
Distancefromintermediategrate(m) /2ndchamber
FIG 9.16 – Magotteaux classifying liners and their effect on ball size distribution (images courtesy Magotteaux).
the second compartment to the feed end where they are most effective in breaking the
larger particles that pass through the diaphragm. This is done by deÁecting balls during
mill rotation towards the feed end. Each classifying liner has a base plate to protect the
mill shell, and a supporting plate to which the deÁector is attached. These liners weigh
25 kg. The standard dimensions of liner plates are 250 mm long and 314 mm around the
mill shell.
shutdowns and mill relines to be planned based on actual rather than historical data.
7KH\DOVRDOORZDQ\GDPDJHGRUFUDFNHGOLQHUVWREHLGHQWLÀHGDQGPRQLWRUHG
3D laser scanner
This technique is the basis of the Outotec® MillMapper. An output from the MillMapper
that comes from viewing the surface of worn liners is shown in Figure 9.17a. Colour is
A B
FIG 9.17 – (A) MillMapper scan of the feed end liners shown in colour and (B) liners in a tumbling mill (images courtesy Outotec).
used to identify the degrees of wear, while data for the colour image are also used for
wear analysis. It uses terrestrial laser scanners to measure in situ the condition of liners in
mills, and forecasts reline timing based on wear trend analysis using intelligent software
and 3D laser scan technology. The MillMapper helps minimise the risk of catastrophic
failure by scanning and modelling liner breakage or localised accelerated wear, and it
provides accurate measurement of liner thickness and the weight and condition of the
entire mill surface. Figure 9.17b shows a tumbling mill with liners worn through use.
The software tracks and forecasts wear on the shell liners and on the discharge and feed
end liners. It also provides accurate information on mill charge; and gives measurements
of all wear surfaces to an accuracy of ±3 mm. The software automatically detects high-
wear zones, asymmetric wear patterns, cracked liners, loose plates and broken grates.
With the information it provides, operators can make informed decisions based on
automated, consistent and repeatable measurements followed by rigorous statistical
analysis. $ppro[imately Àve minutes are needed for pure measurement, e[cluding the
time for entering and exiting the mill (Dandotiya et al, 2011).
CrusherMapper is a similar technique developed by Outotec for monitoring the
condition of crusher liners. It measures concave liner thickness, mantle thickness, open
and closed side settings and the thickness of the spider arm to within 3 mm. It is used
for planning liner change and optimising the use of current liners.
2D laser scanner
A relatively new technique being developed by Multotec is the MultoScan system. It uses
a line scanner to map a 2D slice of the mill liner proÀle that is perpendicular to its central
axis at predetermined points along the shell, as well as speciÀc liner measurements on
the heads. Data is compiled to map the proÀle of the mill liners over their operational
life and can be used to predict remaining liner life as well as perform mill trajectories
(see Figure 9.18).
FIG 9.18 – A plot generated using MultoScan software (image courtesy Multotec).
Vertical pins
The device consists of a frame and Àve, nine and 13 or more rods. An example of a Àve-
rod device can be seen in Figure 9.19. These proÀle gauges are used for rubber liners,
with nails being hit into the rubber until they contact the mill shell to provide the base
height for the measurements. It gives a measure of liner proÀle at the measurement
point using manual inspections. Approximately 30 minutes are required for measuring
12 important liners in the mill.
Acoustic monitoring
The noise emissions produced by steel balls when they collide with other balls or mill
liners and lifters are of speciÀc interest from a mill wear perspective because their
RELINING MILLS
Mill relining can only take place when the mill is shut down, and since the mine does not
earn revenue when the grinding circuit does not operate, it is essential that shutdowns
be as brief as possible while achieving the safest possible work practices.
Only basic mechanisation was used during relining in the 1950s when mill diameters
did not exceed 3 m. The work was labourintensive and timeconsuming, and reline
personnel resorted to a variety of methods to assist in removing and installing liners
including cranes, chains and pulleys. By the late 1960s the largest ball mills had more
than tripled in volume, liners were larger and heavier and mining companies were
devising techniTues to improve relining practices. For example, Bougainville Copper
Ltd had 15 mills that were 5.6 m × 6.4 m in the early 1980s and its staff developed
a relining system that used hydraulic tools, hydraulically powered access platforms
and a conventional liner handler. It resulted in faster and less onerous liner changes.
The use of AG and SAG mills was increasing and the heavy liners in them weighing
up to 8 t reinforced the need for better relining techniTues. Many companies now
provide specialist relining eTuipment and services with the objective of safe and
efÀcient relining practice. Mill relining occurs in two phases: worn liner removal and
new liner insertion.
FIG 9.20 – The Russell Mineral Equipment (RME) recoilless hammer is used to
remove and drive bolts into the mill (image courtesy RME).
A B
FIG 9.21 – Russell Mineral Equipment (RME) (A and B) single and twin mill liner handlers. Each handler has
three axes of movement. (C) Mill relining machine (images courtesy RME); it has seven or eight axes of movement.
FIG 9.22 – Maxitool liner handler – 1500 kg capacity. It can enter mills through
trunnions greater than 780 mm diameter (image courtesy Maxitool).
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Dandotiya, 5, Lundberg, -, Wijaya, A 5 and Parida, A, 2011. Evaluation of abrasive wear
measurement devices of mill liners, COMADEM, 142:3–1.
Magotteaux, n/d. Xclass® >online@. Available from: http://www.magotteaux.com/products
services/tubemillinternals/classifying/xclass/! >Accessed: August 2014@.
Maxitool Group, n/d. Mill relining [online]. Available from: <http://www.maxitool.com.au/
mining/millrelining/! [Accessed: August 2014].
Chapter 10
CLASSIFIERS
Alban Lynch, Mark Weaver, Hakan Dundar,
Hakan Benzer and Jobe Wheeler
FIG 10.1 – Simplified ore-crushing (top) and comminution circuits (bottom) (images courtesy Hakan Dundar).
Low-frequency screens are produced by many manufacturers and there are small
differences but the common factors are the vibrating mechanism, the screen media and
the rigid frame.
CLASSIFICATION
$FODVVLÀHULVGHVFULEHGE\LWVSDUWLWLRQFXUYHZKLFKVKRZVWKHSHUFHQWDJHRIHDFKVL]H
fraction in the feed that enters the coarse product. This is also known as the Tromp
FXUYHVKRZQLQ)LJXUH,QWKLVFKDSWHUWKHSDUWLWLRQFXUYHZLOOEHXVHGWRGHVFULEH
WKHUHVXOWVRIFODVVLÀFDWLRQ
ϭϬϬ
/ĚĞĂů
ϵϬ
ƐĞƉĂƌĂƚŝŽŶ ZĞĂů
ϴϬ
ƐĞƉĂƌĂƚŝŽŶ
ϳϬ
ƉĂƌƚŝƚŝŽŶй
ϲϬ
ϱϬ
ϰϬ
ϯϬ
ϮϬ
&ŝƐŚ,ŽŽŬ
ϭϬ
LJƉĂƐƐ
Ϭ
G
ϭ ϭϬ ϭϬϬ ϭϬϬϬ
ŵĞĂŶƉĂƌƚŝĐůĞƐŝnjĞ;ŵŝĐƌŽŶͿ
FIG 10.3 – Partition or Tromp curve for a classifier (image courtesy Hakan Dundar).
7KHSDUWLWLRQFXUYHLVGHÀQHGE\WKUHHYDULDEOHVWKHVORSHRUVKDUSQHVVRIWKHOLQHDU
section, the d50 YDOXHWKDWGHÀQHVLWVORFDWLRQRQWKHJUDSKDQGWKHE\SDVVZKLFKLVWKH
IUDFWLRQRISDUWLFOHVWKDWDUHPLVSODFHGLQWRWKHFRDUVHIUDFWLRQ7KHUHDVRQIRUDQLQHIÀFLHQW
closed-grinding circuit, which may be caused by high recirculation, can often be traced to
WKHVKDUSQHVVRUE\SDVVRIWKHSDUWLWLRQFXUYH,QZHWJULQGLQJFLUFXLWVK\GURF\FORQHV
UDNH DQG VSLUDO FODVVLÀHUV DQG ÀQH VFUHHQV DUH FRPPRQO\ XVHG DV FODVVLÀHUV EXW
LQ GU\ FLUFXLWV DLU F\FORQHV DOVR UHIHUUHG WR DV DLU VHSDUDWRUV KDYH OLWWOH FRPSHWLWLRQ
7KHGLVFXVVLRQRIFODVVLÀHUVLQWKLVFKDSWHUZLOOUHIHUWRWKHLUSDUWLWLRQFXUYHV
TROMMELS
7KH ZRUG ¶WURPPHO· LV *HUPDQ IRU ¶GUXP· 7URPPHOV DUH F\OLQGULFDO VWUXFWXUHV ZLWK
VFUHHQLQJ PHGLD IRUPLQJ WKH LQWHULRU VXUIDFH KHUHLQ UHIHUUHG WR DV WKH ¶ZRUNLQJ
VXUIDFH· 7URPPHOV FDQ EH PRXQWHG GLUHFWO\ WR WKH GLVFKDUJH HQG RI D JULQGLQJ PLOO
W\SLFDOIRUFRSSHUJROGDQGRWKHUPLQLQJLQGXVWULHVRUWKH\FDQEHPRXQWHGDQGXVHG
independently – sometimes portably – for many applications such as recycling plants.
Trommels come in a wide variety of sizes, as small as a few centimetres in diameter up
WRDVODUJHDVRUP/HQJWKVRIWURPPHOVDUHW\SLFDOO\EHWZHHQDQGWLPHVWKH
working surface diameter. The structural designs depend greatly on how the trommel
LVPRXQWHG,QPRVWFDVHVWKH\DUHPRXQWHGDWWKHLUIHHGHQGWRWKHGLVFKDUJHRIWKH
PLOO FUHDWLQJ D FDQWLOHYHUHG VWUXFWXUH WKDW PXVW EH VXIÀFLHQWO\ VWURQJ WR VXSSRUW
the trommel’s weight plus the weight of the slurry within it for the design life of the
trommel. Typical fatigue analyses are done for a fatigue life of seven years or more.
The wet surfaces of the trommel structure should be protected from wear by bonded
rubber lining or replaceable protectors.
$ WURPPHO·V ZRUNLQJ VXUIDFH ² WKH DFWXDO VFUHHQLQJ PHGLXP XVHG ² YDULHV JUHDWO\
GHSHQGLQJ RQ WKH QHHGV RI WKH DSSOLFDWLRQ /DUJH 6$* PLOO WURPPHOV PRVW RIWHQ XVH
modular moulded rubber panels. Ball mill and rod mill trommels typically use modular
SRO\XUHWKDQHSDQHOV)LJXUHSUHVHQWVVRPHH[DPSOHVRIWURPPHOV
6PDOO WURPPHOV ZLOO IUHTXHQWO\ XVH ZRYHQ ZLUH VFUHHQ ZHOGHG LQWR SODFH WKRXJK
modular polyurethane is gaining popularity. Modularity allows panels in high wear
]RQHVIHHGHQGWREHFKDQJHGZKLOHSDQHOVLQOHVVHUZHDUDUHDVFDQEHOHIWLQORQJHU
7KHZRYHQZLUHRSWLRQLVW\SLFDOO\RQO\XVHGZKHQWKHWURPPHO·VH[SHFWHGOLIHLVVKRUW
and the entire structure is replaced when worn out.
Ball mill and rod mill trommels are used to separate the slurry from the fragmented
JULQGLQJPHGLDUHPQDQWVEDOOVRUURGVWKDWPDNHWKHLUZD\LQWRWKHWURPPHO7KHVOXUU\
passes through the screening media while the remnants report to the discharge end.
7KLVLVGRQHSULPDULO\WRSURWHFWWKHGRZQVWUHDPSXPSVF\FORQHVIURPGDPDJHFDXVHG
E\WKHVWHHOUHPQDQWV6LQFHWURPPHOVDUHW\SLFDOO\PRXQWHGZLWKWKHLUD[LVKRUL]RQWDO
DGYDQFLQJPHFKDQLVPVFDOOHGVFUROOVDUHVRPHWLPHVDWWDFKHGWRWKHVFUHHQLQJPHGLD
to push the unwanted material from the feed end to the discharge end while the slurry
passes through the slotted openings in the screening panels. The direction of rotation is
something that must be known before designing a ball mill trommel as this determines
what orientation the scrolls must have to properly advance the materials.
6$*WURPPHOVDUHJHQHUDOO\XVHGWRVHSDUDWHODUJHURUHSDUWLFOHVWKDWDUHWRRELJIRU
the downstream ball or rod mills from the smaller ore particles that can be processed
GRZQVWUHDP7KHVPDOOHUSDUWLFOHVRUWKURXJKVJRWKURXJKWKHVFUHHQLQJPHGLDZKLOH
WKHODUJHUSDUWLFOHVRYHUVDUHHMHFWHGRXWRIWKHGLVFKDUJHHQGIUHTXHQWO\JRLQJWRD
FUXVKHU RU UHFLUFXODWHG EDFN LQWR WKH 6$* PLOO 6$* WURPPHOV RIWHQ KDYH UHWDUGLQJ
dams attached to the screening media to slow the material, allowing near-size and
XQGHUVL]HSDUWLFOHVWRGURSWKURXJKWKHVFUHHQLQJPHGLD,QFRPLQJRUHPRYHVWKHODUJHU
SDUWLFOHVWRZDUGDQGRXWRIWKHGLVFKDUJHHQG$VXFFHVVIXOWURPPHOGHVLJQZLOOODVWWKH
desired service life, enable easy installation and removal, allow easy maintenance of the
screening media and be sized to support the application’s production needs.
Trommels are usually washed with high-pressure water sprays. The sprays can be
mounted internally to promote material passing through to the undersize, or mounted
H[WHUQDOO\WRNHHSDSHUWXUHVFOHDQDQGIUHHPDWHULDOWRUHSRUWWRWKHRYHUVL]H
A B C
FIG 10.4 – Trommels. (A) Typical large trommel structure showing rings, structural tubes, diagonal supports and
circumferential modular panel fastening provisions; (B) typical ball mill trommel with advancing scroll panel
layout; (C) typical semi-autogenous trommel structure with flow-retarding dams (images courtesy Polydeck).
7URPPHOVDUHVRPHZKDWXQLTXHDPRQJVWFODVVLÀHUVLQWKDWWKH\FDQEHGHVLJQHGWR
JHQHUDWHPXOWLSOHSURGXFWVLQDVLQJOHSDVV$WURPPHOFDQEHÀWWHGZLWKVPDOOSDQHOV
DWWKHIHHGHQGDQGKDYHSURJUHVVLYHO\ODUJHUSDQHOVPRYLQJWRWKHGLVFKDUJHHQG6XFK
a trommel will usually have one product partition below each screen aperture size with
the smallest particles being collected closest to the feed end. This sort of trommel is
XVHIXOIRUVRUWLQJSHEEOHVLQWRVL]HUDQJHVDIWHU6$*PLOOLQJ
A B
FIG 10.5 – Spiral and rake classifiers. (A) Spiral classifier (image courtesy Metso), (B) rake classifiers (image courtesy FLSmidth).
Other classifiers
Many devices have been developed to separate particles that fall at different rates through
ZDWHUEHFDXVHRIGLIIHUHQWVL]HVRUVSHFLÀFJUDYLWLHVKRZHYHURQO\K\GURF\FORQHVUDNH
VSLUDOFODVVLÀHUVDQGÀQHVFUHHQVKDYHEHHQUHJXODUO\XVHGLQFORVHGÀQHJULQGLQJFLUFXLWV
$ UHFHQW GHYLFH LV WKH 5HÁX[TM &ODVVLÀHU ZKLFK VHSDUDWHV VPDOO SDUWLFOHV W\SLFDOO\
PPZLWKRXWWKHXVHRIH[FHVVLYHZDWHU7KLVLQYROYHVDSURFHVVLQDPL[LQJFKDPEHU
LQZKLFKSDUWLFOHVDUHVRUWHGE\WKHIRUFHRIJUDYLW\DQGWKHXSÁRZRIÁXLGLVDWLRQZDWHU
&RDUVHSDUWLFOHVPLJUDWHWRDFHQWUDOXQGHUÁRZYDOYHIURPZKLFKWKH\DUHGLVFKDUJHG
)LQH SDUWLFOHV PLJUDWH WR WKH ODPHOOD VHFWLRQ ZKHUH WKH FKDQQHOV HQKDQFH WKH VHWWOLQJ
rate of misplaced high-density solids that slide down the channels and return to the
PL[LQJ FKDPEHU 7KH RYHUÁRZ FRQWDLQV PRVW RI WKH SURFHVV ZDWHU DQG WKH ÀQH ORZ
density solids. Typical capacity of a large unit for treating iron ore particles in the size
UDQJHWRPPDVZHOODVRWKHULQGXVWULDOPLQHUDOVLVWK
HYDROCYCLONES
%\SXPSVKDGEHFRPHDYDLODEOHWKDWFRXOGPRYHPLQHUDOVOXUULHVDWKLJKYHORFLW\
DQGWKHÁRZVFRXOGEHFRQYHUWHGLQWRURWDU\PRWLRQE\GLUHFWLQJWKHPWKURXJKDWDQJHQWLDO
HQWU\LQWRWKHWRSRIWKHF\OLQGULFDOVHFWLRQRIDF\FORQH7ZRVSLUDOVZHUHIRUPHGDQRXWHU
spiral that moved down the cylinder wall and an inner reverse spiral that moved towards
WKHWRSRIWKHF\OLQGHU+HDY\SDUWLFOHV²E\VL]HRUVSHFLÀFJUDYLW\6*²ZHUHKHOGLQWKH
outer spiral by centrifugal action and discharged through the conical base of the cyclone
DSH[/LJKWHUSDUWLFOHVHQWHUHGWKHLQQHUVSLUDODQGZHUHGLVFKDUJHGWKURXJKDYRUWH[
ÀQGHU,QWKHV.HOO\.UHEVRI(TXLSPHQW(QJLQHHUVGHVLJQHGWKHLQYROXWHHQWU\WR
UHSODFHWKHWDQJHQWLDOHQWU\DQGWKHUHGXFHGWXUEXOHQFHDQGLPSURYHGHIÀFLHQF\PDGH
K\GURF\FORQHVWKHFODVVLÀHURIFKRLFHIRUZHWJULQGLQJFLUFXLWV)LJXUH7KHFXUUHQW
LQYROXWHGHVLJQKDVUHGXFHGWXUEXOHQFHIXUWKHU+\GURF\FORQHVPD\EHVLPSOHLQFRQFHSW
EXWWKHVHGD\VDUHLQHIÀFLHQWLQSUDFWLFHIRUWZRUHDVRQV
A B
WKHDSH[VWUHDPWKDWFDUULHVFRDUVHSDUWLFOHVZLOODOVRFDUU\VRPHÀQHSDUWLFOHVEHFDXVH
these are inevitably present in the water
WKHYRUWH[ÀQGHUVWUHDPFDUU\LQJWKHÀQHSDUWLFOHVZLOODOVRFDUU\VRPHFRDUVHSDUWLFOHV
WKDWKDYHDORZ6*RUKDYHEHHQPLVSODFHGE\WXUEXOHQFHRUURSLQJDOWKRXJKVFUROOHG
involute designs tend to minimise misreporting of coarse particles.
+\GURF\FORQHV DUH HDV\ WR XVH DQG FDQ KDQGOH WKH ZLGH UDQJH RI ÁRZV UHTXLUHG LQ
FORVHGJULQGLQJFLUFXLWVKHQFHGHVSLWHWKHLULQHIÀFLHQFLHVWKH\ZLOOFRQWLQXHWREHXVHG
DVFODVVLÀHUVIRUPDQ\\HDUV
7KH FDSDFLW\ RI WKH K\GURF\FORQH LV OLPLWHG E\ WKH DELOLW\ RI WKH DSH[ WR GLVFKDUJH
VROLGV,IWKHORDGLVWRRKLJKWKHFRQWHQWRIWKHXQGHUÁRZLQFUHDVHVDQGWKHXPEUHOOD
VKDSHGÁRZEHFRPHVDURSHOLNHVWUHDPRIGHQVHSXOS7KHSHUIRUPDQFHGHWHULRUDWHV
ZLWK FRDUVH SDUWLFOHV EHLQJ GLVSODFHG LQWR WKH ÀQH VSLUDO :KHQ D K\GURF\FORQH LV
RSHUDWLQJSURSHUO\WKHGLVFKDUJHVKRXOGÁDUHRXWLQDQXPEUHOODVKDSH:LWKVLOLFHRXV
RUHVURSLQJRFFXUVDWDERXW²SHUFHQWVROLGV
0DQ\ SDUDPHWHUV LQFOXGLQJ GHVLJQ DQG RSHUDWLQJ KDYH DQ LQÁXHQFH RQ WKH
performance of the hydrocyclones. Those parameters are designed or adjusted with
UHVSHFW WR WDUJHW SURGXFW VL]H LQ JULQGLQJ FLUFXLWV IRU D JLYHQ FDSDFLW\ 7DEOH
describes the interactions among the cyclone parameters.
Preliminary selection of hydrocyclones is usually done using manufacturers’ charts,
ZKLFKW\SLFDOO\FRQWDLQDUDQJHRIFXWVL]HVDVVRFLDWHGZLWKHDFKK\GURF\FORQH$FKDUW
IURP0LQFR7HFKLVVKRZQLQ)LJXUH7DEOHSURYLGHVVLPLODULQIRUPDWLRQIURP
Metso.
:KHQGHVLJQLQJDK\GURF\FORQHLQVWDOODWLRQWKHDSSUR[LPDWHFXWSRLQWDQGFLUFXODWLQJ
load are estimated by the circuit designer. Manufacturers’ charts are then used to make
a tentative selection of the size and number of the hydrocyclones and simulation can be
FDUULHGRXWWRDFKLHYHÀQDOVHOHFWLRQRIWKHK\GURF\FORQHFOXVWHU
:KHUHRSHUDWLQJÁH[LELOLW\DQGFRQWUROLVQHHGHGWKHQXPEHURIQRUPDOO\RSHUDWLQJ
F\FORQHV VKRXOG EH JUHDWHU WKDQ ÀYH RU VL[ )HZHU F\FORQHV WKDQ ÀYH ZLOO OHDG WR
TABLE 10.1
Interactions between hydrocyclone parameters.
Parameter Influence
Cyclone diameter Cyclone diameter refers to the inside diameter of the cylindrical part at the top. Larger cyclones result
in a low centrifugal force, so a coarser cut size is obtained.
Apex diameter The apex is the most widely replaced part of the cyclone to adjust the cut size. The smaller the apex
diameter, the coarser the cut size. A smaller apex also leads to a low water split to underflow, thus the
density of the underflow is increased.
Vortex finder diameter A smaller vortex finder results in reduced cut size and capacity. The larger the vortex finder, the lower
the water split to underflow.
Inlet pressure Higher inlet pressure leads to higher centrifugal force inside the cylindrical feed chamber, hence
reduced cut size and water split to underflow. The pressure can be increased by switching off one or
more cyclones in the cluster, so a number of the running cyclones determines the pressure.
Feed viscosity Increased viscosity (such as being due to the presence of clay) can dramatically increase the cyclone cut size.
Feed solids specific gravity (SG) High SG solids will cut at a finer size than low SG solids in the same cyclone conditions. In a mixed ore,
quartz and magnetite will have strikingly different partition curves.
FIG 10.7 – The links between hydrocyclone capacity and diameter, operating pressure and d50 (image courtesy Minco Tech).
TABLE 10.2
The links between hydrocyclone diameter, d50, and volumetric capacity (Metso).
Diameter (mm) d50 microns Capacity (US gallons/min) (L/min)
40 5–14 2.5–6 9.5–22.7
100 9–32 20–50 75.7–189.3
250 13–52 50–170 189.3–643.5
350 20–74 100–300 378–1134
420 23–83 200–500 757.1–1893
600 26–95 290–800 1098–3028
900 31–109 700–2100 2650–7949
1200 38–120 1100–3100 4164–11 735
H[FHVVLYHFKDQJHVLQRSHUDWLQJSUHVVXUHDQGÁRZZKHQDVLQJOHF\FORQHLVWXUQHGRQ
or off to enact control.
+\GURF\FORQHVFDQQRWDFKLHYHFXWSRLQWVFRDUVHUWKDQDERXWPXQOHVVWKHUHDUH
RUHFKDUDFWHULVWLFVVXFKDVORZ6*RUÁDWSDUWLFOHVKDSH
+\GURF\FORQHV LQ FORVHG FLUFXLW FDQQRW EH FRQVLGHUHG ZLWKRXW XQGHUVWDQGLQJ WKH
FRPPLQXWLRQ XQLW DV ZHOO VXFK DV EDOO PLOO SHEEOH PLOO RU URG PLOO )RU H[DPSOH
FKDQJLQJ DSH[ RU YRUWH[ ÀQGHU GLPHQVLRQVKDV OLWWOH HIIHFW RQ WKH XOWLPDWH JULQG VL]H
because the hydrocyclone changes that make separation coarser also make grinding
PRUHHIÀFLHQWDQGYLFHYHUVD7KLVLVZK\K\GURF\FORQHEDOOPLOORSWLPLVDWLRQLVEHVW
conducted by simulation.
7KH FODVVLÀFDWLRQ LV DIIHFWHG E\ SDUWLFOH 6* SDUWLFOH VKDSH DQG VOXUU\ YLVFRVLW\
$SDUWLFOHZLWKDKLJKHU6*QHHGVWREHPXFKÀQHULQRUGHUWRUHSRUWWRWKHK\GURF\FORQH
RYHUÁRZWKDQDSDUWLFOHZLWKDORZHU6*$VDQH[DPSOHIRUDK\GURF\FORQHZLWKDQ
RYHUÁRZFXWVL]HRIP80 PEDVHGRQWKHJDQJXHWKDWLVW\SLFDOO\VLOLFDEDVHGDQG
KDVDQ6*RIDJDOHQDSDUWLFOHZRXOGQHHGWRKDYHDP80 of 44 μm to report to the
RYHUÁRZZKLOHIRUJROGWKHP80ZRXOGEHP
&RQVHTXHQWO\PLQHUDOVVXFKDVEDVHPHWDOVXOÀGHVWHQGWREHFRPHRYHUJURXQGDV
WKH\ F\FOH DURXQG WKH PLOOLQJ FLUFXLW XQWLO ÀQH HQRXJK WR UHSRUW WR WKH K\GURF\FORQH
RYHUÁRZ7KLVLVZK\EDVHPHWDOVXOÀGHÁRWDWLRQÀQDOFRQFHQWUDWHVDUHVRPXFKÀQHU
WKDQ WKH SULPDU\ JULQG VL]H DQG IRU H[DPSOH OHDG ÁRWDWLRQ ÀQDO FRQFHQWUDWHV DUH
W\SLFDOO\ OHVV WKDQ P 7R WKDW HQG VFUHHQV KDYH EHHQ HPSOR\HG LQ FRPPLQXWLRQ
FLUFXLWV WUHDWLQJ KHDY\ DQG EULWWOH PLQHUDOV VXFK DV JDOHQD LQ RUGHU WR PLQLPLVH
RYHUJULQGLQJZLWKVRPHH[FHOOHQWUHVXOWVVHHWKHVHFWLRQRQKLJKIUHTXHQF\VFUHHQV
)LQDOO\ WKLV SURSHUW\ RI K\GURF\FORQHV WR FRQFHQWUDWH KHDYLHU PLQHUDOV LQ WKH
XQGHUÁRZ LV H[SORLWHG LQ FRPPLQXWLRQ FLUFXLWV WUHDWLQJ SUHFLRXV PHWDOV WKLV LV
SDUWLFXODUO\WKHFDVHZLWKJROGZKHUHDSRUWLRQRIWKHK\GURF\FORQHXQGHUÁRZWHQWR
SHUFHQWLVWUHDWHGLQDJUDYLW\FLUFXLW
FINE SCREENS
)LQHVFUHHQVDUHDOWHUQDWLYHVWRK\GURF\FORQHVIRUVHSDUDWLQJVPDOOSDUWLFOHVRQWKHEDVLV
RIVL]H)RUPDQ\\HDUVWKH\KDYHKDGOLPLWHGXVHLQRUHJULQGLQJFLUFXLWVGXHWRKLJK
VHSDUDWLQJVL]HVDQGORZVFUHHQFDSDFLWLHVKRZHYHUDGYDQFHVLQPDWHULDOWHFKQRORJ\
KDYHDOORZHGWKHPDQXIDFWXUHRIÁDWVFUHHQSDQHOVIURPZLUHYDU\LQJLQVL]HIURPP
WRPP$Q\VORWVL]HFDQEHVHOHFWHGIRUWKHVFUHHQDQGWKHWROHUDQFHZLOOEHP
GHSHQGLQJRQWKHVL]HRIWKHZLUH6FUHHQVDUHW\SLFDOO\XVHGWRPLQLPLVHRYHUJULQGLQJ
DQGGHFUHDVHFLUFXODWLQJORDGVZKHQRUHVFRQWDLQUHODWLYHO\VLJQLÀFDQWOHYHOVRIKLJK6*
DQGEULWWOHPLQHUDOVVXFKDVJDOHQD,QWKLVVHFWLRQVLHYHEHQGVDQGYLEUDWLQJVFUHHQV
including Derrick high frequency screens, will be discussed.
Sieve bends
$VLHYHEHQGFRQVLVWVRIDFRQFDYHFXUYHGVFUHHQPRXQWHGLQDIUDPHZLWKWKHVFUHHQ
RSHQLQJVSHUSHQGLFXODUWRWKHÁRZDVVKRZQLQ)LJXUH+RUL]RQWDOZHGJHZLUHV
form the screen.
$ FXUYHG VFUHHQ KDV D JUHDWHU FDSDFLW\ WKDQ D ÁDW VFUHHQ GXH WR IRUFHV H[HUWHG RQ
PDWHULDOÁRZDJDLQVWWKHFXUYHGVXUIDFH6LHYHEHQGVDUHDOVRNQRZQDV'60VFUHHQV
DIWHUWKH'XWFK6WDWH0LQHVZKRLQWURGXFHGWKHVLHYHEHQGDVDVWDWLFVL]LQJVFUHHQ
IRU ÀQH FRDO VOXUU\ DV LW KDG WHQ WLPHV JUHDWHU FDSDFLW\ WKDQ FRQYHQWLRQDO YLEUDWLQJ
VFUHHQV$VVOXUU\ÁRZVGRZQWKHVFUHHQWKHOHDGLQJHGJHRIHDFKZHGJHZLUHVOLFHV
away a thin layer of water and small-particle solids. Larger particles continue down
WKHVFUHHQVXUIDFHZLWKPXFKRIWKHOLTXLGUHPRYHG6HSDUDWLRQVL]HLVVPDOOHUWKDQ
screen aperture, the size of which will depend on the angle of the sieve bend chosen
for the application.
FIG 10.8 – Sieve bend screening mechanism (image courtesy Hakan Dundar).
Vibrating screens
Evolution of screens
6FUHHQLQJ LV WKH SURFHVV RI VHSDUDWLQJ ÀQH SDUWLFOHV IURP FRDUVHU SDUWLFOHV WKURXJK D
screen surface, with the separation size determined by the size of the apertures in the
surface. Screen separation is based primarily on particle size, unlike most other forms
RIFODVVLÀFDWLRQVXFKDVK\GURF\FORQHVZKHUHWKHVHSDUDWLRQLVODUJHO\LQÁXHQFHGE\
particle density. With proper selection of equipment, screens can achieve sharp size
VHSDUDWLRQVZLWKWLJKWWRSVL]HFRQWUROWRWKHXQGHUVL]HDQGPLQLPDOÀQHVE\SDVVWRWKH
RYHUVL]H7KHSUDFWLFHRIVFUHHQLQJLQFRPPLQXWLRQGDWHVEDFNWRWKHGD\VRIPXVFOH
SRZHUHG TXHUQVWRQHV ZKHQ VFUHHQV ZHUH PDGH RI ZRYHQ KD]HO WZLJV IRU FRDUVHU
VHSDUDWLRQVDQGKRUVHKDLUIRUÀQHUVHSDUDWLRQV7KHRYHUVL]HZDVPDQXDOO\UHWXUQHGWR
the querns for further size reduction. Tonnage rates increased when stamp mills began
to be powered by water, wind and then steam, and screen surfaces were constructed
IURP SHUIRUDWHG PHWDO SODWHV IRU GXUDELOLW\ DQG WKHQ IURP ZRYHQ ZLUH PHVK À[HG WR
ZRRGHQIUDPHVIRUÀQHUVHSDUDWLRQV
High-frequency screens
7KHVH ZHUH LQWURGXFHG E\ + : 'HUULFN LQ 7KH KLJKIUHTXHQF\ YLEUDWLRQ ZDV
REVHUYHG WR DFFHOHUDWH ÀQH SDUWLFOH VHSDUDWLRQ ZLWK UDSLG SDUWLFOH VWUDWLÀFDWLRQ ZKLOH
maintaining close contact with the screen surface. The development of blinding-resistant
OD\HUHGZLUHPHVK6DQGZLFKVFUHHQVXUIDFHVOHG'HUULFNWRGLVFRYHUZHWVFUHHQLQJFRXOG
be achieved in a relatively short screen length while water passes to undersize, and in
'HUULFNUHOHDVHGWKH0XOWLIHHGVFUHHQLQJPDFKLQHZLWKDÁRZGLVWULEXWRUVSOLWWLQJ
the feed to three short screen decks operating in parallel in a single vibrating frame.
Multifeeds were adopted into grinding circuits, often in conjunction with hydrocyclones
for ores with high-density differences between the valuable and gangue minerals and
HDVLO\ IULDEOH RUHV WKDW DUH GLIÀFXOW WR UHFRYHU DW ÀQHU VL]HV 7KH SUREOHP ZDV KLJK
consumption rates of screen surfaces.
%\ WKH V QHZ PDWHULDOV RI FRQVWUXFWLRQ VXFK DV UXEEHU DQG XUHWKDQH LPSURYHG
VFUHHQ VXUIDFH GXUDELOLW\ KRZHYHU WKHVH PRUH UREXVW VFUHHQ VXUIDFHV RIWHQ VXIIHUHG
IURPEOLQGLQJDQGDORZRSHQDUHD)LQHVL]LQJZLWKXUHWKDQHVFUHHQVXUIDFHVEHFDPH
more practical when Derrick introduced tensioned, blinding-resistant screen surfaces
ZLWKDKLJKRSHQDUHD6LPLODUWR'60VFUHHQVWKHVHVXUIDFHVXWLOLVHGDWDSHUHGUHOLHI
DQJOH WR SUHYHQW EOLQGLQJ EXW WKH DGGHG ÁH[LELOLW\ RI XUHWKDQH DQG D KLJKHU *IRUFH
YLEUDWLQJVFUHHQVXUIDFHGUDVWLFDOO\LPSURYHGWKURXJKSXW%\K\GURF\FORQHVZHUH
EHLQJUHSODFHGE\0XOWLIHHGVZLWKǍPVFUHHQVXUIDFHVRQODUJHUEDOOPLOOFLUFXLWV
,Q'HUULFNUHOHDVHGWKH6WDFN6L]HUVFUHHQ)LJXUHZLWKÀYHVWDFNHGVFUHHQ
GHFNVRSHUDWLQJLQSDUDOOHOZLWKDFRPSDFWIRRWSULQWPRIVFUHHQZLGWKDQGDKLJK
A B
FIG 10.9 – Derrick Stack Sizer screen: (A) operating principle and (B) a Stack Sizer ready for operation (images courtesy Derrick).
Screen characteristics
Screening equipment should be selected according to the application. Low-frequency
high-amplitude screens are best suited for coarse sizing (>6 mm) applications where
a long stroke is required to dislodge coarse particles from large openings. High-
frequency low-amplitude screens are ideal for Àner separations. 7he low amplitude
allows Àner particles to maintain closer contact with the screen surface for improved
Ànes recovery to undersize. )iner separations also require a thinner bed depth to
reduce Ànes bypass to oversize.
Equipment designs for wet screens are different to dry screens. In wet screening the
Ànes are carried to undersize by water or other Áuid. In general a screen feed density of
20 per cent solids with respect to volume, irrespective of the solids, is recommended.
7his allows for enough water to carry the Ànes to undersize without reducing machine
capacity due to volumetric constraints of the screen drainage rate. In wet screening,
width is more critical than overall screen area. Increased screen width not only reduces
bed depth but for most applications, free water should be drained to undersize within
1 m of screen length. Spray water can be added to improve undersize recovery with
longer screen designs, but without a thin bed, depth Ànes can remain trapped in the
oversize. 7he addition of spray water can also upset the water balance in downstream
operations.
Dry screening requires longer screening as the particles pass to undersize based on the
probability of passing a screen opening. An adequate bed depth should be maintained
to reduce the bouncing of Àne particles. Dry screening requires virtually no moisture
LQ WKH IHHG IRU HIÀFLHQW ÀQHV UHPRYDO (YHQ ORZ OHYHOV RI PRLVWXUH FDQ FDXVH ÀQHV WR
DJJORPHUDWHDQGPLVUHSRUWWRRYHUVL]H6FUHHQLQJEHORZǍPRIWHQUHTXLUHVPRLVWXUH
OHYHOVEHORZSHUFHQW
)DFWRUV WKDW GHWHUPLQH PDFKLQH FDSDFLW\ DUH GU\ VROLGV 6* SDUWLFOH VL]H GLVWULEXWLRQ
SDUWLFOHVKDSHVOXUU\UKHRORJ\YLVFRVLW\SHUFHQWVROLGVIRUZHWSURFHVVHVDQGORRVHEXON
density for dry applications. Manufacturers should be contacted to determine machine
UHTXLUHPHQWV IRU VSHFLÀF DSSOLFDWLRQV 7KLV LV HVSHFLDOO\ WUXH IRU ÀQHU VHSDUDWLRQV RU
PRUHGLIÀFXOWDSSOLFDWLRQVVXFKDVVWLFN\RUÀEURXVPDWHULDO)XOOVFDOHWHVWLQJLVDOZD\V
UHFRPPHQGHGIRUÀQHVFUHHQDSSOLFDWLRQVGXHWRWKHZLGHYDULDELOLW\RIPDFKLQHFDSDFLW\
FIG 10.10 – Apatit circuit flow sheet in ANOF-2 OJSC Apatit (image courtesy Hakan Dundar and Romke Kuyvenhoven).
ϭϬϬ
ϴϬ
ƉĂƌƚŝƚŝŽŶй
ϲϬ
ϰϬ
ƐƉŝƌĂů
ϮϬ
,ϭϬϬϬ
Ϭ
Ϭ͘Ϭϭ Ϭ͘ϭ ϭ ϭϬ ϭϬϬ
ŵĞĂŶƉ͘ƐŝnjĞ;ŵŵͿ
FIG 10.11 – Partition curves for spiral classifier and the main cyclone
at ANOF-2 (image courtesy Hakan Dundar and Romke Kuyvenhoven).
ϭϬϬ
ƐĐƌĞĞŶͲϮϵϳƚͬŚ&ĞĞĚ
ĐLJĐůŽŶĞͲϰϰϳƚͬŚ&ĞĞĚ
ϴϬ
ƉĂƌƚŝƚŝŽŶй
ϲϬ
ϰϬ
ϮϬ
Ϭ
Ϭ͘Ϭϭ Ϭ͘ϭ ϭ
FIG 10.12 – Partition curves for hydrocyclones and screens in the 3.6 × 4.0 m
mill circuit in ANOF-2 (image courtesy Hakan Dundar and Romke Kuyvenhoven).
ϭϬϬ
DͲƐĐƌĞĞŶͬϮϵϳƚͬŚDĨĞĞĚ
DͲĐLJĐͬ͘ϰϰϳƚͬŚDĨĞĞĚ
ϭϬ
ƌͬĚ
Ϭ͘ϭ
Ϭ͘ϭ ϭ Ɖ͘ƐŝnjĞ;ŵŵͿ ϭϬ ϭϬϬ
FIG 10.13 – Breakage rates in the 3.6 × 4.0 m ball mill in ANOF-2 when cyclones
and screens were used (image courtesy Hakan Dundar and Romke Kuyvenhoven).
7KLVFDVHVWXG\FRQÀUPHGRWKHUVWXGLHVWKDWVKRZHGWKDWEHWWHUSDUWLWLRQFXUYHVGXH
to screens led to smaller circulating loads, higher breakage rates, higher feed rates and
PRUH HIÀFLHQW FLUFXLWV 6FUHHQV GR KDYH GLVDGYDQWDJHV KRZHYHU WKH\ DUH ODUJHU DQG
KDYHDKLJKHUFRVWWKDQF\FORQHVÁRZGLVWULEXWRUVDUHH[SHQVLYHEHFDXVHWKH\UHTXLUH
FDUHIXOGHVLJQDQGFRQVWUXFWLRQDSHUWXUHVFDQEHEORFNHGE\ÀEUHVDQGWKHÁRZWRD
PDFKLQHVKRXOGQRWH[FHHGLWVFDSDFLW\RWKHUZLVHWKHSHUIRUPDQFHGHWHULRUDWHV
ϭϬϬ
ƐĐƌĞĞŶ
ϴϬ ĐLJĐůŽŶĞ
ƉĂƌƚŝƚŝŽŶй
ϲϬ
ϰϬ
ϮϬ
Ϭ
Ϭ͘Ϭϭ Ϭ͘ϭϬ ϭ͘ϬϬ
ŵĞĂŶƉ͘ƐŝnjĞ;ŵŵͿ
FIG 10.14 – Partition curves for hydrocyclones and screens in the 5.5 × 6.5 m
ball mill circuit in ANOF-3 (image courtesy Hakan Dundar and Romke Kuyvenhoven).
ϭϬϬ
DͲƐĐƌĞĞŶͬϰϬϬƚͬŚDĨĞĞĚ
DͲĐLJĐůŽŶĞͬϯϮϬƚͬŚDĨĞĞĚ
ϭϬ
ƌͬĚ
Ϭ͘ϭ
Ϭ͘ϭ ϭ ϭϬ ϭϬϬ
Ɖ͘ƐŝnjĞ;ŵŵͿ
FIG 10.15 – Breakage rates in the 5.5 × 6.5 m ball mills in ANOF-3 when cyclones
and screens were used (image courtesy Hakan Dundar and Romke Kuyvenhoven).
AIR CLASSIFIERS
7KH SULQFLSOH RI VHSDUDWLQJ ÀQH SDUWLFOHV LQ DLU OLHV LQ WKH XVH RI FHQWULIXJDO IRUFH
JHQHUDWHGE\DYRUWH[ZLWKVWDWLFFODVVLÀHUVRUDURWDWLQJWXUELQHZLWKG\QDPLFFODVVLÀHUV
,QDJULQGLQJFODVVLI\LQJFLUFXLWRQHFDQDVVXPHWKDWIRUSDUWLFOHVL]HVRIOHVVWKDQP
DSSUR[LPDWHO\WKHVDPHDPRXQWRIHQHUJ\LVQHFHVVDU\IRUFODVVLÀFDWLRQDVLVUHTXLUHG
for grinding.
,Q WKLV VHFWLRQ WKH W\SHV RI DLU FODVVLÀHUV WKDW DUH LQ XVH DUH VXPPDULVHG EULHÁ\
7KHPRVWSRSXODULVWKHWKLUGJHQHUDWLRQKLJKHIÀFLHQF\FODVVLÀHU$LUFODVVLÀHUVDUHPRVW
ZLGHO\XVHGLQFHPHQWJULQGLQJ,QVWDWLFDLUFODVVLÀHUVWKHUHDUHQRPRYLQJSDUWVDQG
WKHDGMXVWPHQWRIWKHFXWVL]HLVFRPSOHWHO\GHSHQGHQWRQWKHDLUÁRZUDWH,QG\QDPLF
FODVVLÀHUVWKHUHLVDURWDWLQJWDEOHRUDURWRUFDJHGHSHQGLQJRQWKHJHQHUDWLRQHQKDQFLQJ
WKH VHSDUDWLRQ HIÀFLHQF\ RI WKH FODVVLÀHU 7DEOH RXWOLQHV WKH HIIHFW RI GHVLJQ DQG
RSHUDWLQJSDUDPHWHUVRIWKHDLUFODVVLÀHUVRQWKHLUSHUIRUPDQFH
TABLE 10.3
Effect of parameters on air classifier performance.
Parameter Influence
Rotor size Rotor size determines the capacity that the air classifier can handle.
Rotor speed As the rotor spins faster, finer cut size is achieved while circulating load increases.
Airflow rate The airflow rate has a major effect on the bypass to the coarse product. More air reduces the bypass but coarsens the product.
Feed rate Increased feed rate to the separator leads to higher bypass and lower cut size.
FIG 10.16 – Schematic views of a conical type air classifier (images courtesy Fives FCB).
FIG 10.17 – Zigzag classifiers (image courtesy Shapiro and Galperin, 2005).
7KH PRVW UHFHQW ]LJ]DJ FODVVLÀHU LV WKH 9VHSDUDWRU WKDW ZDV GHYHORSHG E\ .+'
+XPEROGW :HGDJ $* IRU FORVHGFLUFXLW DSSOLFDWLRQV RI KLJKSUHVVXUH JULQGLQJ UROOV
+3*5)LJXUH0DWHULDOLVIHGDWWKHWRSRIWKHVHSDUDWRUDQGFDVFDGHVWKURXJK
WKHLQFOLQHGSODWHV7KHDLUÁRZIURPRQHVLGHRIWKHVHSDUDWRULVGLUHFWHGWRWKHFDVFDGLQJ
PDWHULDOE\WKHLQFOLQHGSODWHV7KHDLUZLWKÀQHVOHDYHVWKHVHSDUDWRUIURPWKHWRSZKLOH
WKHFRDUVHPDWHULDOLVGLVFKDUJHGDWWKHERWWRP7KH9VHSDUDWRUZDVGHVLJQHGWRKDQGOH
ODUJHDPRXQWVRIPDWHULDODVZHOODVKLJKPRLVWXUHFRQWHQWV
FIG 10.18 – KHD V-separator (image courtesy KHD Humboldt Wedag Group).
PDUNHGWKHVWDUWRIÀUVWJHQHUDWLRQG\QDPLFFODVVLÀHUV7KHVHFRQGDQGWKLUGJHQHUDWLRQV
DSSHDUHG LQ DQG UHVSHFWLYHO\ 7KH GHYHORSPHQW RI DLU FODVVLÀHUV KDV EHHQ
concerned with the reduction of d50, the improvement of partition curves and a smaller
E\SDVV7KHLPSURYHPHQWLQSHUIRUPDQFHLVUHFRUGHGLQ7DEOHDQG)LJXUH
TABLE 10.4
Improvement in performance of air classifiers.
Static First generation Second generation Third generation
(1890) (1960) (1980)
d50 (μm) Not applicable 20+ 15–20 10–15
Bypass (%) 60+ 50+ 15–35 5–15
Sharpness 0.65–0.75 0.80–0.85 0.85–0.90 0.95–1.20
FIG 10.19 – Typical partition curves for the three generations of air classifiers (image courtesy Fives FCB).
First generation
,QWKHÀUVWJHQHUDWLRQRIG\QDPLFVHSDUDWRUVWKHPDWHULDOLVIHGRQWRWKHGLVWULEXWLRQ
SODWHWKDWURWDWHVRQWKHVDPHVKDIWZLWKWKHIDQEODGHV)LJXUH
7KH DLUÁRZ LV VXSSOLHG E\ WKH LQWHUQDO IDQ 7KH PDWHULDO LV GLVWULEXWHG LQVLGH WKH
VHSDUDWLQJ FKDPEHU DQG WKH ÀQHV DUH FDUULHG XSZDUGV WKURXJK WKH IDQ EODGHV WR WKH
outer cone. The coarse particles that move towards the walls of the inner cone by means
RIFHQWULIXJDOIRUFHVIDOOWRWKHERWWRP7KHÀUVWJHQHUDWLRQDLUFODVVLÀHUVRSHUDWHZLWK
high bypass values due to the poor ventilation supplied by an internal fan inside the
VHSDUDWLQJFKDPEHUWKHUHIRUHWKH\DUHORZLQHIÀFLHQF\
Second generation
7KHVHFRQGJHQHUDWLRQG\QDPLFDLUFODVVLÀHUV)LJXUHDUHDOVRNQRZQDVF\FORQLF
VHSDUDWRUV8QOLNHWKHÀUVWJHQHUDWLRQWKHVHFRQGJHQHUDWLRQKDVDQH[WHUQDOIDQWKDW
VXSSOLHVDKLJKYROXPHRIDLUWRWKHFODVVLÀHU$VLQWKHÀUVWJHQHUDWLRQWKHPDWHULDOLV
FIG 10.20 – Schematic view of a first-generation dynamic air classifier (image courtesy Fives FCB).
FIG 10.21 – Schematic view of a second-generation dynamic air classifier (image courtesy Fives FCB).
fed to the distributing plate and the coarse particles moving towards the walls of the
LQQHUFRQHDUHFROOHFWHGIURPWKHERWWRP7KHÀQHSDUWLFOHVDUHFDUULHGWRWKHF\FORQHV
ZLWKWKHULVLQJDLUVXSSOLHGE\DQH[WHUQDOIDQ$VLQVWDWLFDLUFODVVLÀHUVDYRUWH[RFFXUV
LQWKHF\FORQHVDQGWKHÀQHSDUWLFOHVDUHVHSDUDWHGIURPWKHDLUDQGGLVFKDUJHGIURPWKH
ERWWRPRIWKHF\FORQHV7KHDLUH[LWLQJIURPWKHWRSRIWKHF\FORQHVLVUHFLUFXODWHG
Third generation
$ WKLUGJHQHUDWLRQ DLU FODVVLÀHU LV SUHVHQWHG LQ )LJXUH DQG LV NQRZQ DV D KLJK
HIÀFLHQF\VHSDUDWRU
7KHFODVVLÀHUIHHGLVGLVSHUVHGE\DVSLQQLQJGLVWULEXWLRQSODWHDQGIDOOVLQWRWKH]RQH
EHWZHHQVWDWLRQDU\JXLGHYDQHVDQGWKHURWRUFDJH7KHJXLGHYDQHVGLUHFWWKHDLUÁRZ
IURPWKHH[WHUQDOIDQVRWKDWLWWUDQVSRUWVWKHGLVSHUVHGPDWHULDOWRWKHURWRUFDJHZKHUH
FODVVLÀFDWLRQRFFXUV7KHDLUÁRZPD\HQWHUWKHFODVVLÀHUIURPWKHERWWRPRUWKHVLGH
7KH FRDUVHU SDUWLFOHV FROOLGH ZLWK WKH FDJH EODGHV DQG VHWWOH RXW RI WKH VWUHDP 6RPH
coarse material does not enter the cage and the stream leaving at the base of the cone
FRQVLVWVRIWKLVPDWHULDODQGWKHFRDUVHSDUWLFOHVIURPWKHFDJH7KHÀQHSDUWLFOHVOHDYH
from the top or base of the unit according to its design and are collected with cyclones
FIG 10.22 – Schematic views of third-generation dynamic air classifiers (images courtesy The Cement Grinding Office).
RUEDJÀOWHUV7KHLPSRUWDQWYDULDEOHVDUHWKHDLUÁRZDQGWKHFDJHVSHHG7KH26HSD®
VHSDUDWRUQRZEXLOWE\)/6PLGWKZDVWKHÀUVWKLJKHIÀFLHQF\VHSDUDWRUDQGZDVEXLOW
LQ-DSDQLQWKHODWHV,WVLPSRUWDQWIHDWXUHVZHUHORZE\SDVVDQGVKDUSVHSDUDWLRQ
'\QDPLF FODVVLÀHUV DUH QRZ PDGH E\ YDULRXV PDQXIDFWXUHUV ZKLOH WKH\ PD\ GLIIHU
VOLJKWO\WKH\DOOLQFRUSRUDWHWKHSULQFLSOHVXVHGLQWKH26HSDXQLW
$FRPSDULVRQZDVFRQGXFWHGRIDWKLUGJHQHUDWLRQFODVVLÀHU3RO\VLXV6HSROZLWKDQ
HDUOLHU JHQHUDWLRQ XQLW E\ VXEVWLWXWLRQ LQ D FRPPLQXWLRQ FLUFXLW ,W VKRZHG D VSHFLÀF
HQHUJ\VDYLQJRIEHWZHHQDQGSHUFHQWDQGDQLQFUHDVHLQRXWSXWEHWZHHQDQG
SHUFHQWLQIDYRXURIWKH6HSROXQLW7KLVXQLWKDGDZKHHOGLDPHWHURIPDQGD
GULYHSRZHURIN:7KHIDQGHOLYHUHGP3KRXURIDLUDQGKDGDN:PRWRU
6FKPLGW)XUFKQHUDQG=DPSLQL
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Allen,7Particle Size Measurement,S&KDSPDQDQG+DOO/RQGRQ
Bradley,'The HydrocycloneS3HUJDPRQ3UHVV2[IRUG
Duhamel,3K&RUGRQQLHU$DQG/HPDLUH'769®WKHKLJKHIÀFLHQF\G\QDPLFFODVVLÀHU
DQGLWVODWHVWGHYHORSPHQWV)&%5HVHDUFK&HQWUH&HPHQWDQG0LQHUDO,QGXVWULHV&5&0
Dündar,+.DOXJLQ$'HOJDGR03DORPLQR$7UNLVWDQO×$$TXLQR%DQG/\QFK$-
6FUHHQV DQG F\FORQHV LQ FORVHG JULQGLQJ FLUFXLWV LQ Proceedings XXVII International Mineral
Processing Congress (IMPC) 2014SDSHU6DQWLDJR*HFDPLQ
Fahlstrom, 3 + 6WXGLHV RI WKH K\GURF\FORQH DV D FODVVLÀHU LQ Proceedings Sixth IMPC,
&DQQHVSS²
Furchner,%DQG=DPSLQL6$LUFODVVLI\LQJLQUllmann’s Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry,
VHYHQWKHGLWLRQ:LOH\9&+9HUODJ*PE+ &R:HLQKHLP
Heiskanen,.Particle ClassiÀcationS&KDSPDQDQG+DOO/RQGRQ
Lynch,$-Mineral Crushing and Grinding Circuits, Their Simulation, Optimisation, Design and
ControlS(OVHYLHU$PVWHUGDP
Schmidt, ' +RFKOHLVWXQJVVLFKWHU +LJKHIÀFLHQF\ VHSDUDWRU 6(32/ Zement Kalk Gips,
²
Shapiro,0DQG*DOSHULQ9$LUFODVVLÀFDWLRQRIVROLGSDUWLFOHVDUHYLHZChemical Engineering
and Processing Process IntensiÀcation²
Svarovsky,/HydrocyclonesS+ROW5LQHKDUWDQG:LQVWRQ(DVWERXUQH
Wills, % $ DQG 1DSLHU0XQQ 7 - Mineral Processing Technology VHYHQWK HGLWLRQ S
%XWWHUZRUWK+HLQHPDQQ
&DWDORJXHVIRUZHWDQGGU\FODVVLÀHUVDUHDYDLODEOHRQWKHLQWHUQHWIURPVHYHUDOFRPSDQLHVVRPH
RIZKLFKKDYHEHHQUHIHUUHGWRLQWKLVFKDSWHU7KHVHFRPSDQLHVLQFOXGH
x 'HUULFN&RUSRUDWLRQ86$
x )LYHV)&%)UDQFH
x )/6PLGWK'HQPDUN86$
x .+'*HUPDQ\
x 0HWVR)LQODQG
x 0LQFR7HFK$XVWUDOLD
x 7K\VVHQ.UXSS*HUPDQ\
x :HLU0LQHUDOV$XVWUDOLD6FRWODQG
Chapter 11
Overview
A mining operation is essentially a series of interconnected processes, with the
performance of each one affecting those downstream. Optimising these processes in
isolation can lead to suboptimal overall performance, so it is important to analyse them
in the context of the whole operation. This is particularly relevant to blasting, crushing
and grinding. lasting is the rst stage of comminution in most mining operations.
t is an energy ef cient and cost effective way of preparing ore for crushing and
grinding in which the ne particles necessary for mineral liberation and separation
are produced.
Improving the overall mine and plant performance can often be achieved by
optimising blast fragmentation, using levels of blasting energy according to the ores
and downstream processes involved. There are many cases where the additional
costs of greater blasting energy and distribution are more than compensated for
by reducing total energy consumption and improving throughput and recovery.
Unfortunately this has resulted in the belief that increasing explosive consumption
necessarily results in optimising the entire value chain (mining and processing).
For true holistic optimisation, blast intensity is not always increased, but is adjusted
to suit the different types of ores as well as the circuit con guration, e uipment, and
installed power downstream. Table 11.1 shows the typical energy consumed and the
cost per tonne of ore breakage processes.
TABLE 11.1
Typical energy consumption and cost by unit operation in 2014 (A$).
Specific energy (kWh/t) Cost ($/t)
Drill and blast 0.1–0.25 0.1–0.25
Crushing 0.5–8 0.5–1
Grinding 10–35 2–5
Mine to Mill
The term ‘Mine to Mill’ has been widely used to describe initiatives by mining companies,
explosive suppliers and consultants to optimise mines and plants by changing the blast
intensity. Several ‘Mine to Mill’ initiatives have been implemented over the past 20 years
with varying degrees of success. A range of examples is provided in the AusIMM
Proceedings Mine to Mill Conference by Scott and Morrell (1998).
To be successful, Mine to Mill projects re uire a structured methodology supported by
auditing, surveys, data analysis and training. ene ts include
x maximising throughput (mine and mill)
x better overall process stabilisation and minimum operating cost with minimum
adverse impacts
x developing accurate throughput forecast models to establish optimum blending
strategies
x reducing energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions.
The methodology developed by Metso Process Technology and Innovation (PTI)
includes
x Scoping – historical information collected on-site to identify problems, bottlenecks
and opportunities.
x Ore characteristics – used to de ne ore domains that have similar fragmentation
properties based on rock structure and strength (see Table 11.2).
x Benchmarking, audits and surveys – audits and surveys are conducted for the key
processes of drill and blast, crushing, grinding, otation leaching and dewatering.
Tracking allows ore source and ore characteristics to be linked to process
performance. The SmartTag™ (Figure 11.1) ore tracking system uses robust passive
radio fre uency transponders ( FI tags) that are detected when they pass antennas
located at critical points in the process ahead of the milling circuit. Each tag has
TABLE 11.2
Ore characterisation measurements.
Rock structure – Rock strength – Floatability –
fragmentation modelling comminution modelling flotation modelling
tRock quality designation (RQD) tDrop weight parameters (A, b, ta) tAssay measurement
tFracture frequency tSMC Drop Weight Index (DWi) tLiberation measurement using
tJoint and plane mapping with Sirovision tUnconfined compressive strength (UCS) FEI’s Mineral Liberation Analyser or
system tPoint Load Index (PLi) QEMSCAN systems
tBond Ball Mill Work Index (BBMWi) tAssay by size
tLaboratory flotation tests
a uni ue code that allows it to be tracked from the mine to the primary grinding
mill feed. The data collected are analysed and compared with benchmark data from
mines and processing plants around the world.
x 'eveloping sitespeciÀc process models and simulations – data from benchmarking,
audits, surveys and ore characterisation are used to develop site-speci c models for
key processes, and are integrated to represent the total process.
x Validation and implementation – a detailed plan is developed to implement optimisation
strategies based on mine and plant constraints and cost bene t analysis.
x Sustaining the EeneÀts – incorporating the recommended process changes into
managerial and site operating procedures plus training of operators and engineers
ensures that the bene ts are maintained over the longer term.
Optimising blasting
An important component of the Mine to Mill approach is optimising drill and blast
practices. Better distribution of the energy used during blasting for certain ore types
will often produce a run-of-mine ( OM) si e distribution that has a controlled top
si e and more ne material. Blast intensity is not always increased it is adjusted to
suit different types of ores and provide a consistent and optimised fragmentation. As a
result the primary crusher gap may be reduced since ner OM enables this to be done
without compromising crusher throughput. For semi-autogenous grinding (SAG) mills,
higher throughput may be achieved when the SAG mill feed has as ne a top si e as
possible, the smallest possible amount of 2 to mm intermediate si e material and the
maximum amount of -10 mm nes. This is demonstrated in Figure 11.2.
FIG 11.2 – Schematic of ideal semi-autogenous grinding mill feed size distribution (image courtesy Walter Valery).
intensity blasts produced even ner OM fragmentation and subse uently ner feed
to the SAG mill. Additional adjustments were made to the crusher, and SAG and ball
mill circuits to achieve the best overall performance. The additional blasting energy was
more than compensated for by the large energy savings in the crushing and grinding
processes, thus minimising the speci c energy consumption of the entire operation.
At the beginning of the project in 2006, the throughput was 2600 t h with a speci c
energy consumption of 1 k h t. At the end of the project in 2010, the throughput
was 500 t h with a speci c energy of 10.5 k h t. This represents an energy saving of
25 per cent.
More detail on this project can be found in ybinski et al (2011) Samuel, alery and
ybinski (2012) and alery and ybinski (2012).
Cu Flotation
Zn Flotation
SAG Mill
Pyrite Flotation
Ore
Tailing
Thickener
HIG
Mill Py Cleaner
Flotation
Tailings
Py Thickener
Ball Mill Cu Cleaner
Flotation
TC2 Zn Cleaner
Flotation
Py Pressure Filter
Cu Thickener Zn Thickener
Cu Pressure Filter
Py Concentrate
Cu Concentrate Zn Concentrate
FIG 11.3 – Comminution by semi-autogenous grinding, ball and high intensity grinding
mills in a polymetallic sulfide ore flotation circuit (image courtesy Outotec).
Fine-grained ores may re uire more than one regrind mill if further liberation is
re uired for particles in several streams. ith complex, ne-grained ores becoming
an important source of metals, and with the development of mills that are able to grind
smaller than 5 μm, this type of circuit and more complex versions of it will become
increasingly important.
Cu Flotation
Ore
HIG Mill Tailings
SAG Mill Thickener
Ball Mill
Cu Cleaner Flotation
Tailings
Concentrate
Thickener
Cu Concentrate
Pressure Filter
FIG 11.4 – Comminution in a typical low-grade copper sulfide flotation circuit (image courtesy Outotec).
chemical composition of the kiln feed and the kiln operation itself are closely controlled,
reducing disturbances in the mill feed however, variations do occur and an automatic
control system is necessary to recognise and compensate for them.
FIG 11.5 – Single-stage ball mill and separator (image courtesy Hakan Dundar).
Hybrid grinding
Hybrid grinding refers to the recycling of a portion of the classi er coarse to the HPG
together with the portion of HPG product as shown in Figure 11.7. As in the open-
FIG 11.7 – High-pressure grinding rolls grinding some reject from the
separator in the ball mill separator circuit (image courtesy Hakan Dundar).
circuit pregrinding application, the HPG prepares the feed for downstream ball
milling. A proportion of classi er coarse product is also used to adjust the nes amount
in the HPG feed for effective grinding.
As in the open-circuit pregrinding application, the HPG prepares the feed for
downstream ball milling. A proportion of classi er coarse product is also used to adjust
the nes amount in the HPG feed for effective grinding.
Semi-finish grinding
In semi- nish grinding, the HPG is in closed circuit with the static air classi er, which
is shown as a ‘ -sep’ ( -separator) in Figure 11.8, and the ne product from the -sep
goes to the dynamic air classi er of the ball mill circuit.
The -sep is manufactured by H and is well suited to closed-circuit grinding
applications. Product from the HPG is fed into the top of the separator. While cascading
through the inclined plates it de-agglomerates. The nes are carried with the air ow to
the dynamic air classi er and coarse from the -sep is recycled to the HPG . Particles at
nal product si e in nes from the -sep are separated in the dynamic classi er hence,
some portion of the nal product comes from the HPG circuit as well as from the ball
mill circuit. Since the feed going into the ball mill is signi cantly ner in this case, there
is no need for a two-chamber ball mill.
FIG 11.8 – High-pressure grinding rolls separator circuit with fines going
to the separator in the ball mill circuit (image courtesy Hakan Dundar).
FIG 11.9 – High-pressure grinding rolls separator circuit with fines going
to the ball mill in the ball mill circuit (image courtesy Hakan Dundar).
FIG 11.10 – High-pressure grinding rolls in closed circuit with two separators
in series to produce finished cement (image courtesy Hakan Dundar).
FIG 11.11 – Finished cement produced by a vertical roller mill–separator in closed circuit.
In the coal industry this mill is known as a vertical spindle mill (image courtesy Hakan Dundar).
Overview
The extent of comminution in coal circuits depends on the coal type and its use. These
aspects are summarised in Figure 11.12.
Comminution for coal preparation plants is discussed in this section. E uipment for
breaking hard coal is discussed in this chapter, beater wheel mills for breaking lignite
are discussed in Chapter 7.
Coal is broken after mining to facilitate transport, and occasionally for direct use.
Metallurgical coal is prepared for use in ironmaking furnaces by being broken to liberate
the non-coal material and then separating this from the combustible material by gravity
and otation processes.
WŽǁĞƌ
/ŶĚƵƐƚƌŝĂů
Lignite
36%
Lowrankcoal WŽǁĞƌ
47% 64%
Subbitumenous
Anthracite
2% ŽŵĞƐƚŝĐ
Hardcoal /ŶĚƵƐƚƌŝĂů
53% dŚĞƌŵĂů
98% WŽǁĞƌ
Bitumenous /ŶĚƵƐƚƌŝĂů
DĞƚĂůůƵƌŐŝĐĂů
/ƌŽŶΘƐƚĞĞů
FIG 11.12 – Coal types – percentage of world resources and their uses
(image courtesy Hakan Dundar, drawn from data provided by Professor Alban Lynch).
A B
C D
E F
FIG 11.13 – Crushers for coarse coal (images courtesy Australian Coal Preparation Society). (A) Rotary breaker,
(B) hammer mill, (C) slow-speed high-torque sizer, (D) single rolls crusher, (E) double rolls crusher, (F) feeder breaker.
crushers tend to be any of the aforementioned devices while secondary units tend to be
rotary breakers or si ers. Additional stages are almost always si ers. Some mines utilise
only primary crushing while others have up to four stages of crushing. The nature of the
coal, the desired nal top si e of the particles and nes minimisation will determine the
e uipment selection.
the metallic cores are subject to more extensive crushing and grinding to liberate
the mineral. Initial coal testing identi es the type of properties that determine the
potential uses of the coal and those that indicate the best way to process the coal.
In one core it is possible to identify coal that has coking properties and coal that is
suitable for pulverised coal injection or thermal use. Because of their differences in
price, identifying how much of each can be recovered from the coal, as well as how
best to achieve it, is often critical to the nancial success of a project. etermining the
breakage pattern of the coal is critical to identifying potential products.
Because coal is relatively low priced, it must be processed as cheaply as practical.
The processing cost is cheaper for coarser coal and for simple processes. Therefore
crushing should be minimised to what is re uired to achieve the top si e that ensures
recovering the optimum product. A further complication in determining the optimum
top si e for some coals is that further crushing will often liberate particles with better
ualities, but the increased nes in the product may result in higher processing costs,
higher product moisture (that is, lower product values) and handling dif culties.
The nes may re uire special handling techni ues for storage and transport while the
high moisture level may result in market rejection of the product coal. Higher cost of
treatment and handling needs to be balanced by a higher coal selling price.
FIG 11.14 – Mill system arrangements (images courtesy Glenn Schumacher, AGL).
(A) Vertical spindle mill type (suction example), (B) ball/tube mill type (pressure example).
FIG 11.15 – Power plant coal mill inputs and outputs – vertical
spindle mill type (image courtesy Glenn Schumacher, AGL).
The ‘just-in-time’ nature of power station coal milling re uires a milling system that
incorporates classi ers to control the PF si ing. With some mill types (for example,
SMs) the classi er is enclosed within the mill body, but other mill types (such as ball
tube mills) use external classi ers. In addition to the classi cation that takes place within
the classi er itself, other classi cation processes occur within the mills. There can be
a number of recirculation loops within a mill or milling system, and the situation can
be further complicated by the existence of mill reject systems that reject undesirable
material (tramp metal and non-coal bearing rock) from the mill.
The recirculation circuits that exist within the mill are illustrated in Figure 11.16.
With vertical spindle mills the coal from the feeder enters the mill through a chute
passing down through the classi er and is delivered directly to the grinding one. ry,
hot air (primary air – PA) enters the mill through a plenum under the grinding table
and passes up through a port ring on the outer periphery of the grinding table. The PA
creates a uidising one that collects ne material from the grinding one and transports
the ground material upwards inside the mill body. Heavy non-coal material passes into
the mill rejects discharge system and is rejected from the mill. The ground coal collected
by the uidising PA travels upwards inside the mill however, the velocity decreases
above the direct uidising one and larger particles fall back to the grinding one.
Smaller particles are entrained in the PA ow and are classi ed. Particles in the coarse
stream are returned to the mill for regrinding those in the ne stream exit the mill and
ow through the system, which distributes the PF to the burners.
FIG 11.16 – Power plant coal mill internal circuits for coal and air (coal and
air enter through the same chute) (image courtesy Glenn Schumacher, AGL).
FIG 11.17 – The role of the milling system in power station operation (image courtesy Glenn Schumacher).
FIG 11.18 – Relationship between control elements and the milling system (image courtesy Glenn Schumacher).
FIG 11.19 – Control elements in the milling system (image courtesy Glenn Schumacher).
With power station units being built to operate for long, continuous periods (typically
two to four years before maintenance shutdowns), the plants are often designed with
an additional mill to ensure full output. This redundancy is to allow out-of-service
mill maintenance to be possible without interrupting the unit output however, mill
performance over the operating campaign between overhauls naturally deteriorates.
Whilst some online control mechanisms, such as classi er adjustments on SMs,
allow adaptation to varying mill performance, the fact remains that issues such as mill
wear create some control challenges. The introduction of additional parameters such as
variable speed mill drives may offer more adaptation capability however, such changes
are not common as they are seen as adding complexity to power station mill systems.
parameter used for control.1 In a typical plant the operators follow the results coming
from the laboratory on an hourly basis to control the production rate. The disadvantage
of this type of procedure is that the response time is too long and in most cases the
operators have to periodically adjust the production to compensate for the uctuations
in the cement uality.
Mill sound level is a measure of mill lling and can be monitored by microphones.
ecreasing sound amplitude and increasing power indicates that the mill is lling
conversely, increasing sound and decreasing power indicates that the level is falling.
This can be built into a control system if necessary.
In addition to feed rate control, the ratio of additives going in to the cement control is
critical for uality assurance and an automatic loop is used to keep the ratio constant as
advised by the laboratory manager. The PS of the nished cement can be measured on
a sample off-line using a laser si er or, more fre uently, by the amount retained on 32 or
45 microns using a rapid sieving techni ue such as an Alpine air jet sieve. The PS can also
be measured online using the Hosokawa Alpine Optisi er and it can be controlled by the
rotor speed. A PI controller is suitable for this loop. umerous control techni ues have
been developed to predict the PS of the cement and to use this as a basis for controlling
the mill and the separator processes simultaneously, but they are not widely adopted.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Duda, W H, 1985. Cement Data Book, three volumes, 444 p (Bauverlag GMBH Wiesbaden and Berlin).
National Instruments, 2011. PI theory explained online . Available from http www.
ni.com white-paper 3782 en Accessed 29 March 2011 .
Outotec Solutions, 2012. Outotec Mineral Processing Solutions online . Available from http
www.outotec.com .
Rybinski, E, Ghersi, , avila, F, inares, , alery, W, ankovic, A, alle, and ikmen, S,
2011. Optimisation and continuous improvement of the Antamina comminution circuit,
in Proceedings Fifth International Conference on Autogenous and Semi-Autogenous Grinding
Technology, SAG2011, paper #130.
Samuel, M, alery, W and ybinski, E, 2012. Mine-to-mill mastery Antamina boosts throughput
for hard ores with support from Metso PTI, CIM Magazine, 7(7) 44–46.
Scott, A and Morrell, S, 1998. Proceedings Mine to Mill Conference, 248 p (The Australasian Institute
of Mining and Metallurgy Melbourne).
Standards Australia, 2002. AS 1038.20-2002 Coal and coke – Analysis and testing – Higher rank
coal – Hardgrove grindability index, Part 20.
Swanson, A , Fletcher, I S and Partridge, A C, 1993. Improved prediction of si e distributions
and their effects in material handling and coal preparation, ACA P project 1290, uly.
Valery, W and ybinski, E, 2012. Optimisation process at Antamina boosts production and energy
ef ciency helping a large copper inc mine meet the economic challenge of processing harder
ore types, Engineering and Mining Journal (E&MJ), September, pp 116–120.
1. The Blaine test gives an indication of the surface area of cement particles, which is important because cement
works by adhering to sand and gravel. Grinding cement finer gives a higher surface area and produces a stronger
cement, but requires more energy.
Chapter 12
MILLING CIRCUIT
CALCULATIONS
Hakan Dundar, Don Burgess, Bianca Foggiatto,
Marcos Bueno, Eddie McLean and Greg Lane
INTRODUCTION
&RPPLQXWLRQ FLUFXLWV FRQWDLQ JULQGLQJ PLOOV DQG FODVVLÀHUV 7KH\ DUH OLQNHG E\ WKH
FLUFXODWLQJ ORDG ZKLFK LV WKH VWUHDP FRQWDLQLQJ WKH FRDUVHUVL]HG SDUWLFOHV IURP WKH
FODVVLÀHUV W\SLFDOO\ WKH XQGHUÁRZ WKDW LV UHWXUQHG WR WKH PLOOV IRU IXUWKHU JULQGLQJ
7KH FLUFXODWLQJ ORDG LV RIWHQ PXFK ODUJHU LQ WRQQHV SHU KRXU WKDQ WKH IUHVK IHHG VR
FDQ KDYH D VHULRXV HIIHFW RQ WKH HIÀFLHQF\ RI WKH PLOO DQG WKH FDSDFLW\ RI WKH FLUFXLW
'HWHUPLQLQJWKHFLUFXODWLQJORDGDQGWKHHQHUJ\UHTXLUHGSHUWRQQHWRJULQGPDWHULDO
IURPF80 to P80 DUH LPSoUtDQt FDOFXODtLoQV IoU HYHU\ PLOOLQJ FLUFXLt 7KH ÀUVt VHFtLoQ LQ tKLV
FKDStHU LV FoQFHUQHG ZLtK tKHVH FDOFXODtLoQV
K͕Ž
ŝ
&͕Ĩ
ŝ
h͕Ƶ
ŝ
FIG 12.1 – Hydrocyclone streams (image courtesy Hakan Dundar).
ZKHUH
F LV tKH FODVVLÀHU IHHG UDtH
U LV tKH FODVVLÀHU FoDUVH SUoGXFt ÁoZ UDtH
O LV tKH FODVVLÀHU ÀQH SUoGXFt ÁoZ UDtH
fi, ui, oi DUH tKH DVVD\ oU PDVV IUDFtLoQ LQ LtK VL]H UDQJH oI IHHG, XQGHUÁoZ DQG oYHUÁoZ
UHVSHFtLYHO\
&oPELQLQJ (TXDtLoQV DQG JLYHV tKH VLPSOLÀHG IoUP oI tKH oYHUÁoZIHHG
2) UDtLo, ZKLFK FDQ EH GHVLJQDtHG DV ǃ (TXDtLoQ 7KHQ, SUoYLGHG tKH VL]H
GLVtULEXtLoQV oU DVVD\V DUoXQG D FODVVLÀHU DQG tKH ÁoZ UDtH oI Dt OHDVt oQH VtUHDP DUH
NQoZQ, tKH PLVVLQJ ÁoZ UDtHV DUoXQG tKH FODVVLÀHU FDQ EH FDOFXODtHG 6oPH PLVVLQJ VL]H
GLVtULEXtLoQV DUoXQG tKH FLUFXLt FDQ DOVo EH FDOFXODtHG SUoYLGHG tKDt VXIÀFLHQt PHDVXUHG
YDOXHV DUH DYDLODEOH ([DPSOHV oI tKH PDVV EDODQFH HTXDtLoQV DUH DV IoOOoZV
)ƛIi )ƛXi²2ƛXi2ƛRi
)ƛIi²)ƛXi 2ƛRi²2ƛXi
)ƛIi – ui 2ƛRi – ui)
f-u
b= O = i i
F oi - ui
8VLQJ PHDVXUHG GDtD, (TXDtLoQ ZLOO JLYH D UDQJH oI YDOXHV IoU ǃ IoU HDFK VL]H
FODVV KoZHYHU, E\ GHÀQLtLoQ ǃ LV tKH IUDFtLoQ oI totDO IHHG UHSoUtLQJ to tKH oYHUÁoZ
VtUHDP DQG FDQ oQO\ KDYH oQH tUXH YDOXH 7KHUHIoUH, DV D VtDUtLQJ SoLQt LQ tKH PDVV
EDODQFLQJ SUoFHVV, (TXDtLoQ LV GHULYHG to FDOFXODtH tKH EHVt HVtLPDtHG YDOXH oI ǃ E\
FoQVLGHULQJ DOO VL]H FODVVHV toJHtKHU
7KH GLIIHUHQFH EHtZHHQ tKH IHHG DQG tKH VXP oI tKH SUoGXFtV IoU DQ\ VL]H FODVV LV tKH
PDVV ÁoZ HUUoU IoU tKDt VL]H FODVV, DV VKoZQ LQ (TXDtLoQ
Ti = fi ]1 - b g ui - boi
7o ÀQG tKH EHVt YDOXH oI ǃ tKDt PLQLPLVHV tKH totDO PDVV ÁoZ HUUoU, tKH GHULYDtLYH oI
tKH VTXDUHG HUUoU VXP LV VHt to ]HUo
d / T2i = 2 / _ f - ]1 - b gu - bo i_ - o + u i
i i i i i
db
b=
/ _oi - uii_ fi - uii
/ _oi - uii2
$ItHU tKH FDOFXODtLoQ oI ǃ, tKH VL]H GLVtULEXtLoQV FDQ EH DGMXVtHG E\ HOLPLQDtLQJ tKH
HUUoUV tKDt FDQ FoPH IUoP VDPSOLQJ DQG VL]H DQDO\VLV (TXDtLoQ FDOFXODtHV tKH HUUoU
ZKLOH tKH IoOOoZLQJ HTXDtLoQV DUH XVHG to GLVtULEXtH tKH HUUoU to tKH ZKoOH VL]LQJ GDtD
fti = fi - Ti
O
ut i = ui + b 1 - l Ti
F
O
oti = oi + b l Ti 8
F
ZKHUH
'i GHQotHV tKH HUUoU
tf LV tKH FoUUHFtHG SHU FHQt UHtDLQHG YDOXH IoU IHHG
i
ut i LV tKH FoUUHFtHG SHU FHQt UHtDLQHG YDOXH IoU XQGHUÁoZ
oti
LV tKH FoUUHFtHG SHU FHQt UHtDLQHG YDOXH IoU oYHUÁoZ
$ VLPSOH H[DPSOH LV SUoYLGHG LQ 7DEOH , ZKLFK JLYHV tKH PHDVXUHG SHU FHQt UHtDLQHG
YDOXHV DUoXQG D FODVVLÀHU ZLtK 0 tK IHHG UDtH
TABLE 12.1
Measured size distributions around the classifier (per cent retained).
Size class (mm) Classifier feed (f) Classifier underflow (u) Classifier overflow (o)
+0.177 0.00 0.00 0.00
-0.177/+0.125 5.68 7.78 0.04
-0.125/+0.088 12.19 16.52 0.47
-0.088/+0.063 19.90 26.15 2.98
-0.063/+0.044 19.47 29.10 9.64
-0.044/+0.031 12.38 11.18 15.64
-0.031/+0.022 8.30 4.68 18.11
-0.022/+0.016 4.48 1.78 11.98
-0.016 17.60 2.81 41.14
Total 100.00 100.00 100.00
7DEOH SUoYLGHV tKH PDVV EDODQFH FDOFXODtLoQV IoU HDFK VL]H FODVV 7KH VL]LQJV LQ HDFK
VtUHDP DUH FoUUHFtHG Vo tKDt FDOFXODtLoQV IoU HYHU\ VL]H FODVV \LHOGV tKH VDPH FLUFXODtLQJ
OoDG
TABLE 12.2
Mass balance calculations using Equations 12.4 to 12.8.
Size class oi-ui fi-ui (oi-ui) × (oi-ui)2 Di tf ut i ot i
i
(mm) ( fi-ui)
+0.177 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
-0.177/+0.125 -7.74 -2.10 16.25 59.91 0.65 5.03 8.20 0.27
[0.04–7.78] [5.68–7.78] [-7.74 × -2.10] [(-7.74)2] [5.68-(1–0.355) [5.68–0.65] [7.78 + [0.04 + 0.355
× 7.78- (1–0.355) × 0.65]
(0.355 × 0.04)] × 0.65]
-0.125/+0.088 -16.05 -4.33 69.50 257.60 1.36 10.83 17.40 0.95
-0.088/+0.063 -23.17 -6.25 144.81 536.85 1.97 17.93 27.42 3.68
-0.063/+0.044 -19.46 -9.63 187.40 378.69 -2.73 22.20 27.34 8.67
-0.044/+0.031 4.46 1.20 5.35 19.89 -0.38 12.76 10.93 15.51
-0.031/+0.022 13.43 3.62 48.62 180.36 -1.14 9.44 3.94 17.71
-0.022/+0.016 10.20 2.70 27.54 104.04 -0.92 5.40 1.19 11.65
-0.016 38.33 14.79 566.90 1469.19 1.19 16.41 3.58 41.56
∑1066.37 ∑3006.53 => β = O/F = 1066.37/3006.53 = 0.355
ϭϬϬ
ϴϬ
ůĂƐƐŝĨŝĞƌ
&ĞĞĚ
ƉĂƐƐŝŶŐй
ϲϬ
ůĂƐƐŝĨŝĞƌ
ŽĂƌƐĞ
ϰϬ
ůĂƐƐŝĨŝĞƌ
&ŝŶĞ
ϮϬ
ĐŽƌƌĞĐƚĞĚ
Ϭ
Ϭ͘Ϭϭ Ϭ͘ϭ ϭ
Ɖ͘ƐŝnjĞ;ŵŝĐƌŽŶͿ
FIG 12.2 – Measured and corrected size distributions around the classifier (image courtesy Hakan Dundar).
U $ ui
Pui = # 100
F $ fi
O $ oi
Poi = # 100 0
F $ fi
ZKHUH
Pui LV tKH DFtXDO SHUFHQtDJH oI VL]H IUDFtLoQ i LQ tKH IHHG tKDt UHSoUtV to FoDUVH SUoGXFt
Poi LV tKH DFtXDO SHUFHQtDJH to tKH ÀQH SUoGXFt
7KHUHIoUH
Pui = 00 ² Poi
&DOFXODtLoQ VtHSV IoU DQ DFtXDO SDUtLtLoQ FXUYH IoU D PDVV EDODQFHG GDtD VHt DUH JLYHQ LQ
7DEOH ,Q tKLV H[DPSOH tKH IHHG to tKH FODVVLÀHU LV tK, FoDUVH SUoGXFt LV 08 tK
DQG ÀQH SUoGXFt LV 8 tK 7KH VL]H GLVtULEXtLoQV DUoXQG tKH FLUFXLt DUH DOVo JLYHQ
$FtXDO SDUtLtLoQ FXUYHV to FoDUVH DQG ÀQH SUoGXFt DUH JLYHQ LQ )LJXUH , ZKLFK
VKoZV tKDt tKH FXUYHV LQtHUVHFt Dt 0 SHU FHQt
TABLE 12.3
Partition curve calculations.
Size range Feed Underflow Overflow Actual Pui Actual Poi
(μm) fi (%) F × fi ui (%) U × ui oi (%) O × oi (U × ui/F × fi) × 100 (O × oi/F × fi) × 100
+425 0.00 - 0.00 - 0.00 - - -
-425/+300 2.39 3.66 3.48 3.65 0.02 0.01 99.74 0.26
-300/+212 2.15 3.29 3.13 3.28 0.02 0.01 99.72 0.29
-212/+150 4.32 6.61 6.25 6.55 0.12 0.06 99.10 0.88
-150/+106 12.55 19.20 17.96 18.82 0.79 0.38 98.02 1.98
-106/+74 15.39 23.55 21.33 22.35 2.47 1.19 94.93 5.06
-74/+53 17.04 26.07 21.80 22.85 6.69 3.22 87.63 12.37
-53/+38 12.31 18.83 12.80 13.41 11.24 5.42 71.22 28.76
-38/+25 9.19 14.06 6.19 6.49 15.71 7.57 46.14 53.85
-25/+18 5.70 8.72 2.06 2.16 13.61 6.56 24.75 75.22
-18/+12 5.50 8.42 1.32 1.38 14.59 7.03 16.44 83.57
-12/+8.6 3.38 5.17 0.72 0.75 9.16 4.42 14.59 85.38
-8.6/+6.2 2.23 3.41 0.52 0.54 5.95 2.87 15.97 84.06
-6.2/+3 3.13 4.79 0.93 0.97 7.91 3.81 20.35 79.61
-3/+1.8 1.80 2.75 0.61 0.64 4.39 2.12 23.21 76.83
-1.8 2.92 4.47 0.90 0.94 7.33 3.53 - -
Total 100 153.00 100 104.80 100.00 48.20 - -
100
80
WĂƌƚŝƚŝŽŶй
60
ActualPui
40 ActualPoi
20
0
1 10 100 1000
DĞĂŶƉĂƌƚŝĐůĞ ƐŝnjĞ;ђŵͿ
FIG 12.3 – Actual partition curves for the coarse and fine products (image courtesy Hakan Dundar).
)oU tKH XQGHUÁoZ oU FoDUVH SUoGXFt, tKH SDUtLtLoQ FoHIÀFLHQt GHFUHDVHV ZLtK GHFUHDVLQJ
SDUtLFOH VL]H to D PLQLPXP DQG tKHQ PD\ VtDUt LQFUHDVLQJ 7KLV SKHQoPHQoQ LV tHUPHG
¶E\SDVV· 6oPH SoUtLoQ oI tKH IHHG PDtHULDO E\SDVVHV to tKH FoDUVH SUoGXFt UDtKHU tKDQ
SDVVLQJ tKUoXJK tKH VHSDUDtLoQ ]oQH IoU H[DPSOH, E\ EHLQJ HQtUDLQHG EHtZHHQ ODUJHU
SDUtLFOHV DQG Qot KDYLQJ tKH oSSoUtXQLt\ to EH FODVVLÀHG 7KH E\SDVV FoQtDLQV VoPH
ÀQHU SDUtLFOHV tKDt VKoXOG UHSoUt to tKH ÀQH SUoGXFt VtUHDP EXt DFtXDOO\ UHSoUt to tKH
FoDUVH SUoGXFt VtUHDP DQG, DV D UHVXOt, tKH SDUtLtLoQ FoHIÀFLHQt LQFUHDVHV Dt tKHVH VL]HV
,Q tKH QXPHULFDO H[DPSOH tKH E\SDVV LV SHU FHQt, ZKLFK LV tKH PLQLPXP YDOXH
oI tKH SDUtLtLoQ FoHIÀFLHQt 7KH DVVXPStLoQ LV tKDt LI tKH E\SDVV LV SHU FHQt, tKHQ
SHU FHQt oI HYHU\ VL]H IUDFtLoQ LQ tKH IHHG JoHV to tKH FoDUVH SUoGXFt GXH to tKH
E\SDVV PHFKDQLVP ,t LV DOVo QotHG tKDt ¶E\SDVV· LV VoPHtLPHV FDOOHG ¶ZDtHU VSOLt· VLQFH
tKH IUDFtLoQ oI ZDtHU tKDt UHSoUtV GLUHFtO\ to tKH FoDUVH SUoGXFt ZLtKoXt FODVVLÀFDtLoQ LV
DSSUo[LPDtHO\ SUoSoUtLoQDO to tKH IUDFtLoQ oI ÀQHV tKDt Go tKH VDPH
7KH QH[t VtHS LQ tKH SDUtLtLoQ FXUYH FDOFXODtLoQ LV to tDNH tKH E\SDVV oXt oI tKH DFtXDO
SDUtLtLoQ FXUYH 7KH QHZ FXUYH LV FDOOHG tKH ¶FoUUHFtHG SDUtLtLoQ FXUYH· DQG Lt toXFKHV
tKH [D[LV Dt LtV PLQLPXP YDOXH 7KH FoUUHFtHG SDUtLtLoQ FXUYH LV FDOFXODtHG XVLQJ
(TXDtLoQ )LJXUH JLYHV tKH FoUUHFtHG SDUtLtLoQ FXUYH FDOFXODtLoQ
7KH SDUtLtLoQ YDOXHV PXVt EH SOottHG DJDLQVt tKH PHDQ VL]H oI tKH SDUtLFOHV LQ HDFK VL]H
LQtHUYDO $V tKH VLHYHV XVHG DUH LQ D JHoPHtULF SUoJUHVVLoQ, tKH JHoPHtULF PHDQ VL]H LV
XVHG
U $ ui - _F $ fi ) bypassi P - bypass
Puci = # 100 or Puci = ui # 100
F $ f - _ F $ fi ) bypassi
i
100 - bypass
100
ActualPui
80
CorrectedPuci
WĂƌƚŝƚŝŽŶй
60
40
20
0
1 10 100 1000
DĞĂŶƉĂƌƚŝĐůĞ ƐŝnjĞ;ђŵͿ
FIG 12.4 – Actual and corrected partition curves for the coarse product (image courtesy Hakan Dundar).
ÀQH SUoGXFt tKH VKDUSQHVV oI tKH VHSDUDtLoQ LV UHIHUUHG to DV tKH VOoSH oI tKH OLQHDU
SDUt oI tKH SDUtLtLoQ FXUYH $V tKH SDUtLtLoQ FXUYH VtHHSHQV, tKH FODVVLÀHU PoYHV toZDUG
LGHDO VHSDUDtLoQ LQ tHUPV oI HIÀFLHQF\ ,Q LGHDO VHSDUDtLoQ, ZKLFK PHDQV 00 SHU FHQt
HIÀFLHQF\, DOO SDUtLFOHV DEoYH tKH FXt VL]H DUH FODVVLÀHG DV FoDUVH ZKLOH DOO SDUtLFOHV EHOoZ
DUH FODVVHG DV ÀQH )LJXUH JLYHV tKH DFtXDO DQG FoUUHFtHG SDUtLtLoQ FXUYHV DQG LGHDO
VHSDUDtLoQ IoU tKH FXt VL]H oI DUoXQG 0 P, ZKLFK ZDV GHtHUPLQHG IoU tKH QXPHULFDO
H[DPSOH 7KH ÀJXUH DOVo VKoZV tKH FoUUHFtHG SDUtLtLoQ FXUYH DV GHVFULEHG 7KH FoUUHFtHG
d0 UHIHUUHd to DV d0F LV DOZD\V FoDUVHU tKDQ tKH DFtXDO d0
Ideal
separation
Partition %
Corrected
curve
Actual
separation
)LVK
+RRN
%\SDVV
G GF
Mean particle size (micron)
FIG 12.5 – Actual and ideal efficiency curves (image courtesy Hakan Dundar).
JULQdLQJ $* DQd VHPLDXtoJHQoXV JULQdLQJ 6$* PLOOV (DFK PHtKod LQYoOYHV XVLQJ
ODEoUDtoU\ tHVtV to dHtHUPLQH tKH PDtHULDO JULQdDELOLt\ dHVFULEHd LQ &KDStHU %DVHd
oQ tKH PDtHULDO JULQdDELOLtLHV DQd HPSLULFDO IoUPXODH, tKH VSHFLÀF HQHUJ\ oI PLOOLQJ
FLUFXLtV LV FDOFXODtHd
%oQd·V LQYHVtLJDtLoQV tDUJHtHd XQdHUVtDQdLQJ tKH UHODtLoQVKLS EHtZHHQ tKH
FoPPLQXtLoQ HQHUJ\ DQd tKH SUodXFt VL]H oEtDLQHd IoU D JLYHQ IHHd VL]H +H dHYHOoSHd
DQ HTXDtLoQ %oQd, tKDt FDQ EH DSSOLHd to FUXVKHUV DQd Uod DQd EDOO PLOOV ,Q ,
%oQd SXEOLVKHd HTXDtLoQV IoU FDOFXODtLQJ tKH :oUN ,QdH[ :L IUoP ODEoUDtoU\ tHVt
UHVXOtV 7KH &UXVKLQJ :oUN ,QdH[ LV oEtDLQHd IUoP OoZHQHUJ\ LPSDFt tHVtV, ZKLOH Uod
DQd EDOO PLOO ZoUN LQdLFHV DUH oEtDLQHd ZKHQ HTXLOLEULXP LV UHDFKHd LQ D OoFNHdF\FOH
tHVt, DV dHVFULEHd LQ &KDStHU 7\SLFDO YDOXHV oI tKHVH ZoUN LQdLFHV ZHUH SXEOLVKHd
E\ %oQd DQd DUH SUHVHQtHd LQ &KDStHU 7KH DSSUoDFK FoQVLVtV oI tKH IoOOoZLQJ
VtHSV
dHtHUPLQH tKH oUH FKDUDFtHULVtLFV :L YLD D VtDQdDUdLVHd ODEoUDtoU\ tHVt
SUHdLFt tKH VSHFLÀF HQHUJ\ DQd tKH SoZHU dUDZ oI tKH LQdXVtULDO PDFKLQH
oEtDLQ tKH SoZHU dUDZ IoU tKH UHTXLUHd tKUoXJKSXt IUoP tKH UHODtLoQVKLS
P=TðW
ZKHUH
P LV tKH SoZHU dUDZ N:
W LV tKH VSHFLÀF HQHUJ\ N:Kt
T LV tKH VoOLdV tKUoXJKSXt tK
$FFoUdLQJ to %oQd, tKH VSHFLÀF HQHUJ\ W LV SUoSoUtLoQDO to tKH QHZ FUDFN tLS OHQJtK
JHQHUDtHd LQ SDUtLFOH EUHDNDJH DQd LV HTXDO to tKH ZoUN UHSUHVHQtHd E\ tKH SUodXFt
PLQXV tKDt UHSUHVHQtHd E\ tKH IHHd 7KLV UHODtLoQVKLS LV H[SUHVVHd DV IoOOoZV
10 - 10
W = Wi e P80 F80 o # 1.1 (Wi = kWh/st)
7KH &UXVKLQJ :oUN ,QdH[ FDQ DOVo EH XVHd to dHtHUPLQH tKH UHTXLUHd oSHQVLdH
VHttLQJV 266 IoU MDZ FUXVKHUV DQd J\UDtoU\ FUXVKHUV, oU FOoVHdVLdH VHttLQJV &66 IoU
FoQH FUXVKHUV IoU D JLYHQ SUodXFt VL]H
7KH VSHFLÀF HQHUJLHV FDOFXODtHd IoU Uod DQd EDOO PLOOV UHTXLUH FoUUHFtLoQV to DYoLd
LQFoUUHFtO\ HVtLPDtLQJ tKH ZoUN LQSXt SHU toQQH oI PDtHULDO ,QLtLDOO\, %oQd SUoSoVHd
FoUUHFtLoQV IoU FDVHV ZKHUH tKH IHHd ZDV VFDOSHd SULoU to JULQdLQJ /DtHU, LQ ,
5oZODQd DQd .MoV UHYLHZHd %oQd·V FoUUHFtLoQV DQd UHFoPPHQdHd tKH XVH oI HLJKt
HIÀFLHQF\ IDFtoUV IoU oSHUDtLoQV tKDt dLIIHU IUoP tKH VSHFLÀHd FoQdLtLoQV DQd oStLPXP
IHHd VL]HV oI D Uod DQd EDOO PLOOLQJ FLUFXLt 5oZODQd DQd .MoV, 80 7KHVH LQFOXdH
x () ² dU\ JULQdLQJ
x () ² oSHQ FLUFXLt
x () ² PLOO dLDPHtHU
x () ² FoDUVH IHHd
x () ² ÀQH IHHd
x () ² UHdXFtLoQ UDtLo IoU Uod PLOOV
x () ² UHdXFtLoQ UDtLo IoU EDOO PLOOV
x ()8 ² Uod PLOO LQHIÀFLHQF\
7KH UHTXLUHd SoZHU dUDZ LV FoUUHFtHd E\ PXOtLSO\LQJ tKH FDOFXODtHd SoZHU dUDZ E\
tKH HIÀFLHQF\ IDFtoUV
Efficiency factors
7KH QDtXUH DQd YDOXH oI HDFK IDFtoU LV DV IoOOoZV 5oZODQd DQd .MoV, 80
x () LV XVHd ZKHQ dU\ JULQdLQJ LV FoQVLdHUHd 3oZHU PXVt EH LQFUHDVHd EHFDXVH dU\
JULQdLQJ FoQVXPHV 0 SHU FHQt PoUH SoZHU tKDQ ZHt JULQdLQJ () =
x () LV DSSOLHd ZKHQ D EDOO PLOO LV oSHUDtHd LQ DQ oSHQ FLUFXLt 9DOXHV IoU () DUH
OLVtHd LQ 7DEOH
x () LV tKH PLOO dLDPHtHU HIÀFLHQF\ IDFtoU DQd Lt XVHV D EDVH PLOO LQtHUQDO dLDPHtHU oI
8 It P DV UHIHUHQFH () YDOXHV DUH FDOFXODtHd IUoP tKH IoOOoZLQJ HTXDtLoQV
8 0.2
EF3 = b IoU ' LQ IHHt 8 = 8 It LQVLdH OLQHUV
Dl
2.44 0.2
EF3 = b IoU ' LQ PHtUHV
D l
,I ' 8 P It, tKHQ () = 0 PD[LPXP
x () LV XtLOLVHd ZKHQ H[tUD SoZHU LV UHTXLUHd IoU oYHUVL]Hd IHHdV 7KH UHIHUHQFH IHHd
VL]H LV JLYHQ E\ tZo HTXDtLoQV
TABLE 12.4
EF2 values.
Product size control reference EF2 Product size control reference EF2
% passing % passing
50 1.035 90 1.40
60 1.05 92 1.46
70 1.10 95 1.57
80 1.20 98 1.70
x () LV tKH ÀnHnHVV oI JULnd IaFtoU ,t LV aSSOLHd ZKHn P80 LV ÀnHU tKan P
x () LV XVHd ZKHn tKH Uod PLOO UHdXFtLon UatLo 5U LV not oStLPXP tKat LV, tKH
UHdXFtLon UatLo LV OoZHU tKan oStLPXP 7KH oStLPXP UHdXFtLon UatLo LV FaOFXOatHd
XVLnJ tKH IoOOoZLnJ HTXatLon
L
Rr0 = 8 + b 5 #
Dl
ZKHUH
L LV tKH Uod OHnJtK
D LV tKH PLOO LnVLdH OLnHU dLaPHtHU Ln It
,I Rr0 ² < Rr < Rr0 + , Lt PHanV tKat () LV not aSSOLHd
2tKHUZLVH
2
_ Rr - Rr0i
EF6 = 1 +
150
x () LV XVHd ZKHn tKH EaOO PLOO UHdXFtLon UatLo LV OHVV tKan VL[ 7KLV oFFXUV SaUtLFXOaUO\
Ln UHJULndLnJ
EF7 = Rr - 1.22
Rr - 1.35
x ()8 FonVLdHUV tKH Uod PLOO LnHIÀFLHnF\ ZKHn Ln dLIIHUHnt FLUFXLt FonÀJXUatLonV
x ()8 = LI a VLnJOH Uod PLOO FLUFXLt IoOOoZV an oSHn FUXVKLnJ FLUFXLt
x ()8 = LI a VLnJOH Uod PLOO FLUFXLt IoOOoZV a FOoVHd FUXVKLnJ FLUFXLt
x ()8 = LI a UodEaOO PLOO FLUFXLt IoOOoZV an oSHn FUXVKLnJ FLUFXLt
x ()8 = 0 LI a UodEaOO PLOO FLUFXLt IoOOoZV a FOoVHd FUXVKLnJ FLUFXLt
Mill power calculations using the Bond method and efficiency factors
3oZHU FaOFXOatLonV dLVFXVVHd Ln tKLV VHFtLon aUH EaVHd on %ond·V PHtKod, ZKLFK LV
dHVFULEHd Ln &KaStHU and UHIHUUHd to Ln &KaStHUV and 7KH IoOOoZLnJ FLUFXLtV aUH
dLVFXVVHd
x oSHnFLUFXLt Uod PLOO &aVH $
x Uod PLOO EaOO PLOO FLUFXLt &aVH %
x FOoVHdFLUFXLt VLnJOHVtaJH EaOO PLOO &aVH &
x oSHnFLUFXLt VLnJOHVtaJH EaOO PLOO &aVH '
x IHHd FontaLnLnJ H[FHVVLYH ÀnHV &aVH (
x 6$* PLOO EaOO PLOO FLUFXLt at tKH &adLa OoZJUadH FonFHntUatoU &aVH )
:oUN ,ndH[ LV dHÀnHd aV tKH energy required in kWh/t to UHGXFHDSDUWLFOHRILQÀQLWHVL]H
to 380 of 100 μm ,I tKH NnoZn :oUN ,ndH[ LV 0 N:Kt, tKH tKHoUHtLFaO VSHFLÀF HnHUJ\ LV
aOVo 0 N:Kt %Xt aOO PatHULaOV KaYH an HnHUJ\ YaOXH dHSHndLnJ on SaUtLFOH VL]H %ond,
Vo tKHUH LV aOZa\V HnHUJ\ FUHdLtHd to F80 tKat ZLOO UHdXFH tKH ÀnaO VSHFLÀF HnHUJ\
FaOFXOatLon
Alternative 1
7KH SUHOLPLnaU\ PLOO VHOHFtLon PadH IUoP a taEOH oI PLOO VL]HV 5oZOand and .MoV,
80 LV
x ,' = 0 It P, / = 00 It P
x () = 0 FaOFXOatHd aFFoUdLnJ to tKH SUHOLPLnaU\ VHOHFtLon oI PLOO dLaPHtHU
x nHZ SLnLon SoZHU = 0 ð 0 = 88 KS
x PLOO VHOHFtLon IUoP taEOH LV It P ,', / = 00 It HIIHFtLYH JULndLnJ OHnJtK (*/
at 0 SHU FHnt Uod FKaUJH ZLtK 80 N: PotoU
x () = FaOFXOatHd aFFoUdLnJ to tKH VHOHFtHd PLOO dLPHnVLonV
x VHOHFtHd PLOO It ,', 0 It (*/ oSHUatLnJ at 0 SHU FHnt Uod FKaUJH FonVXPLnJ
0 N: at tKH SLnLon
Alternative 2
7KH SUHOLPLnaU\ PLOO VHOHFtLon PadH IUoP tKH taEOH LV
x ,' = 0 It P, / = 0 It (*/ 8 P
x tZo PLOOV ZLOO EH UHTXLUHd, aUoXnd 000 N: HaFK
x () = 0 FaOFXOatHd aFFoUdLnJ to tKH SUHOLPLnaU\ VHOHFtLon oI PLOO dLaPHtHU
x nHZ SLnLon SoZHU = 0 ð 0 = KS oU KS HaFK
x PLOOV VHOHFtHd IUoP taEOH aUH tZo at 0 It ,', / = 0 It 8 P (*/ at 0 SHU FHnt
Uod FKaUJH and 8 N: PotoUV tKH totaO SoZHU aYaLOaEOH LV LnVXIÀFLHnt
x to aFKLHYH tKH UHTXLUHd SoZHU dUaZ tKH PLOO OHnJtK LV LnFUHaVHd aV IoOOoZV OHnJtK to
It 8 P and dLaPHtHU IUoP It to 0 It P
x () = FaOFXOatHd aFFoUdLnJ to tKH VHOHFtHd PLOO dLPHnVLonV
x VHOHFtHd PLOOV tZo at It ,' E\ It (*/ at 0 SHU FHnt Uod FKaUJH and 0 N: PotoUV
totaO SoZHU LV 00 N:, FoPSaUHd to onH PLOO at 80 N:
x VHOHFtHd PLOO It ,', It (*/ at SHU FHnt Uod FKaUJH FonVXPLnJ 8 N: at tKH
SLnLon
x () = 1$, () = 0, () = 0, () = 1$, () = 0, () = 1$, ()8 = 0 rod
mill IHHd iV VFrHHn XndHrVi]H
x Sinion SoZHr = 0 N: at SHr FHnt rod FKarJH ZitK a dHnVit\ oI tm 0 mm
diamHtHr rodV at 0 SHr FHnt FritiFal VSHHd ZitK nHZ linHrV
x mill Vi]H inVtall a It m ,' ð 0 It m (*/ oYHrÁoZ rod mill ZitK a
00 N: motor
TABLE 12.5
Efficiency factors.
Product size % passing Efficiency multiplier Product size % passing Efficiency multiplier
50 1.035 90 1.40
60 1.05 92 1.46
70 1.10 95 1.57
80 1.20 98 1.70
ϯϬϬϬ
ϮϳϱϬ
ϮϱϬϬ
ϮϮϱϬ
ϮϬϬϬ
ϭϳϱϬ
T80μm
ϭϱϬϬ
ϭϮϱϬ
ϭϬϬϬ
ϳϱϬ
ϱϬϬ
ϮϱϬ
Ϭ
ϭ ϭ͘ϱ Ϯ Ϯ͘ϱ
A B DBCFACTOR
FIG 12.6 – (A) DBC graph to convert Ab values to equivalent Rod Mill Work Indices (RMWi) for the 25 000 μm to
3000 μm SG calculation; (B) DBC factors for given transfer size T80 (μm) (images courtesy Don Burgess Consulting).
7KH sXEsFriSts 6$*, &, 5 and % rHIHr to 6$* mills, FrXsKHrs, rod mills and Eall mills,
rHsSHFtiYHl\
6inFH tKHn, otKHr mHtKodoloJiHs KaYH EHHn dHYHloSHd Ior FalFXlatinJ sSHFiÀF HnHrJ\
Ior $* and 6$* mills 6omH oI tKHsH mHtKodoloJiHs arH dHsFriEHd, ZitK mHtKods XsHd
E\ 60&& 0orrHll, 00 and $XsHnFo /anH, )oJJiatto and %XHno, 0 dHsFriEHd in
dHtail 7KH sHlHFtHd mHtKodoloJiHs arH XsHd in ZorNHd H[amSlHs SrHsHntHd in &KaStHr
MacPherson
0aF3KHrson 8 FrHatHd a JrindinJ tHst tKat Zas FondXFtHd in a FontinXoXs laEorator\
mill in FlosHd FirFXit ZitK a FlassiÀHr Xntil stHad\statH Zas aFKiHYHd $t tHst FomSlHtion,
si]H anal\sHs ZHrH FarriHd oXt and tKH sSHFiÀF HnHrJ\ FalFXlatHd XsinJ SoZHr draZ and
tKroXJKSXt inIormation 7KH tHst also SroYidHd insiJKt into KoZ tKH KardHr FomSonHnts
EXild XS in tKH mill FKarJH (mSiriFal ForrHFtions ZHrH aSSliHd to tKH laEorator\ mill
:orN ,ndH[ to dHÀnH tKH :orN ,ndH[ Ior Slant dHsiJn
GrindPower
7KH mHtKodoloJ\ SroSosHd E\ %arratt and $llan 8 Zas inForSoratHd into a
FomSXtHrEasHd SroJram Ior tKH si]inJ and sHlHFtion oI JrindinJ FirFXits FallHd
*rind3oZHr 0attKHZs and %arratt,
mill FomminXtion tHst 60& morH rHFHntl\, Irom tKH rotar\ ErHaNaJH tHst -.5%7 7KH
6$* mill and Eall mill SoZHr draZs arH FalFXlatHd indHSHndHntl\ XsinJ sHmiHmSiriFal
HTXations as a IXnFtion oI mill JHomHtr\, sSHHd and load
SAGDesign™
7KH 6$*'HsiJn tHst Zas dHYHloSHd E\ 6tarNH\ and sXSSortHd E\ 'aZson /aE and
2XtoNXmSX noZ NnoZn as 2XtotHF to oYHrFomH tHFKniFal limitations oI tKH 63, tHst
6tarNH\, +indstrom and 1adasd\, 00 $FFordinJ to tKH aXtKors, its main limitation
Zas tKat tKH 63, tHst rHTXirHd onl\ a NJ tHst, so man\ samSlHs ZHrH nHFHssar\ to
aFKiHYH dHsirHd aFFXraF\ lHYHls 7KH 6$*'HsiJn tHst SroFHdXrH XsHs a larJHr laEorator\
6$* mill tKan tKH 63, tHst and rHTXirHs aSSro[imatHl\ 0 NJ oI samSlH ZitK FoarsHr toS
si]H 7KH JroXnd matHrial JHnHratHd E\ tKH 6$* mill is XsHd in a sXEsHTXHnt Eall mill
%ondst\lH :orN ,ndH[ tHst %\ FondXFtinJ tKHsH tZo tHsts, tKH total JrindinJ HnHrJ\ Fan
EH FalFXlatHd
OMC’s method
6idall and 3Xtland 00 SXElisKHd tKH 20& 2rZa\ 0inHral &onsXltants mHtKod to
FalFXlatH JrindinJ SoZHr rHTXirHmHnt EasHd on laEorator\ tHsts tKat dHÀnH tKH FoarsH
and ÀnH KiJK and loZHnHrJ\ ErHaNaJH FKaraFtHristiFs +iJKHnHrJ\ ErHaNaJH tHsts
sXFK as tKH aXtoJHnoXs mHdia FomSHtHnF\ tHst $0&7, -.':7, 63, or 6$*'HsiJn
tHst arH tZinnHd ZitK a loZHnHrJ\ ErHaNaJH tHst sXFK as %ond %all 0ill :orN ,ndH[
%0:i 6tandardisHd IHHd and SrodXFt si]Hs arH XsHd to FalFXlatH tKH oYHrall HnHrJ\
rHTXirHmHnts XsinJ %ond·s IormXla and an I6$* HIÀFiHnF\ IaFtor 7KH 20& dataEasH is
tKHn XsHd to sHlHFt YiaElH oStions oI FirFXit FonÀJXration Ior dHtailHd anal\sis
DBC’s method
%XrJHss 0 dHYHloSHd '%&·s 'on %XrJHss &onsXltinJ mHtKodoloJ\ Ior FalFXlatinJ
JrindinJ HnHrJ\ XsinJ %ond·s FomminXtion tKHor\ 7Kis is tKHn XsHd to FalFXlatH tKH
sSHFiÀF HnHrJ\ oI indiYidXal FomminXtion ranJHs XsinJ ErHaNaJH FKaraFtHrisation
indiFHs oEtainHd Irom %ond·s FrXsKHr tHsts, rod and Eall mill tHsts and tKH -.':7
7KH SaramHtHrs oEtainHd Irom tKH -.':7 arH FonYHrtHd to JrindaEilit\ :orN ,ndiFHs
and $* or 6$* mill sSHFiÀF HnHrJ\ is FalFXlatHd 7Kis is ForrHFtHd ZKHn Yariations
oFFXr to standard SaramHtHrs sXFK as 6*, $ðE YalXHs and mill asSHFt ratio
Morrell’s method
$FFordinJ to 0orrHll 00, tKH sloSH oI tKH Slot Irom an 60& 7Hst Ior EroNHn SrodXFt
SHr FHnt oI XndHrsi]H aJainst tKH inSXt HnHrJ\ is rHlatHd to tKH strHnJtK oI tKH roFN 7Kis
is tKHn XsHd to JHnHratH a strHnJtK indH[ ':i, ZKiFK is XsHd to HstimatH tKH sSHFiÀF
HnHrJ\ oI a ZidH ranJH oI FomminXtion FirFXits
7KH sSHFiÀF HnHrJ\ oI tKH $* or 6$* mill Fan EH dHtHrminHd XsinJ tKH IolloZinJ
HTXation
a
S = KF80 DWi b ^1 + c ]1 - e-dJ gh-1s e f ^ Ar h
ZKHrH
S is tKH sSHFiÀF HnHrJ\ at tKH Sinion
F80 is 80 SHr FHnt SassinJ si]H oI tKH IHHd
DWi is tKH strHnJtK indH[
J is tKH YolXmH oI Ealls SHr FHnt
s is tKH mill sSHHd SHr FHnt oI FritiFal sSHHd
fAr is a IXnFtion oI mill asSHFt ratio
a, b, c, d and e arH Fonstants
K is a IXnFtion ZKosH YalXH dHSHnds on ZKHtKHr a SHEElH FrXsKHr is in tKH
circuit
7KH sSHciÀc HnHrJ\ oI tKH $* or 6$* mill can EH dHtHrminHd E\ comSarinJ tKH
oSHratinJ conditions Ior tKH circuit undHr considHration ZitK a larJH dataEasH oI
oSHratinJ $* and 6$* mills 7KH si[ constants and tKH Iunction fAr, ZKicK arH usHd to
coYHr diIIHrHnt oSHratinJ conditions in tKH HTuation, arH SroSriHtar\
7KH 60& SoZHrEasHd aSSroacK usHs :orN ,ndicHs rHlatHd to conYHntional crusKHrs,
KiJKSrHssurH JrindinJ rolls +3*5s and tumElinJ mill SroSHrtiHs 0orrHll, 00,
00 7Kis is donH usinJ tKH SoZHrEasHd si]H rHduction HTuation
- x f (x1)k
x i
W = 4 # Mi # a x 2f_ 2
1
ZKHrH
W is tKH circuit sSHciÀc HnHrJ\ N:Kt
Mi is an indH[ rHlatHd to tKH ErHaNaJH SroSHrt\ oI an orH and is dHtHrminHd
E\ tKH 60& 7Hst N:Kt
x and x arH tKH 80 SHr cHnt SassinJ si]Hs in μm Ior tKH circuit Sroduct and IHHd
7KH Iunction is dHSHndHnt on tKH P80 and can EH calculatHd usinJ tKH IolloZinJ HTuation
0orrHll, 00
f _ x j i = - _0.295 + x j 1000000i
Mi SaramHtHrs arH JHnHratHd E\ tKH 60& 7Hst Mic is tKH indH[ Ior conYHntional
crusKinJ and Mih is tKH indH[ Ior +3*5 si]H rHduction Mia is tKH :orN ,ndH[ rHlatHd
to coarsH JrindinJ, sucK as Iound in rod, $* and 6$* mills 7KH %0:i tHst raZ data
is usHd to H[traSolatH tKH :orN ,ndH[ rHlatHd to ÀnH JrindinJ, Mib 7KH coarsH ranJH
coYHrs tKH staJHs Srior to Eall millinJ and ÀnH ranJH rHlatHs to conYHntional Eall millinJ
7KH si]H sHlHctHd as tKH diYision EHtZHHn coarsH and ÀnH JrindinJ Zas 0 mm
Mi SaramHtHrs arH usHd to SrHdict total sSHciÀc HnHrJ\ oI tKH comminution circuit
7KH sum oI Wc, Wh, Wa and Wb rHsults in tKH total sSHciÀc HnHrJ\ to oEtain a Ànal Sroduct
)or H[amSlH, iI tKH circuit contains an $* or 6$* mill and a Eall mill, tKH mHtKodoloJ\
SrHdicts tKH comEinHd sSHciÀc HnHrJ\ oI tKH mills 7KH total sSHciÀc HnHrJ\ WT to
rHducH Srimar\ crusKHr Sroduct to Ànal Sroduct in si]H is JiYHn E\
WT = Wa + Wb + Wc + Wh + Ws
ZKHrH
Wa is tKH sSHciÀc HnHrJ\ to Jrind coarsHr SarticlHs in tumElinJ mills
Wb is tKH sSHciÀc HnHrJ\ to Jrind ÀnHr SarticlHs in tumElinJ mills
Wc is tKH sSHciÀc HnHrJ\ Ior conYHntional crusKinJ
Wh is tKH sSHciÀc HnHrJ\ Ior +3*5s
WV is tKH sSHciÀc HnHrJ\ corrHction Ior si]H distriEution
0orrHll 0 SuElisKHd YaluHs attriEutHd to tKH constants as IolloZs
x K = 0 Ior all circuits tKat do not contain a rHc\clH SHEElH crusKHr and 0 ZKHrH
circuits KaYH a SHEElH crusKHr 7Kis SaramHtHr is onl\ usHd Ior coarsH SarticlH JrindinJ
in tumElinJ mills
x K = 0 Ior all crusKHrs oSHratinJ in closHd circuit ZitK a classiI\inJ scrHHn ,I tKH
crusKHr is in oSHn circuit Ior H[amSlH, +3*5s and SHEElH crusKHrs in an $*6$*
circuit, K taNHs tKH YaluH oI
x Sc is a coarsH orH KardnHss SaramHtHr tKat is usHd in Srimar\ and sHcondar\ crusKinJ
situations 7Kis SaramHtHr Zas includHd to alloZ Ior tKH dHcrHasH in orH KardnHss
tKat EHcomHs siJniÀcant in rHlatiYHl\ coarsH crusKinJ aSSlications sucK as Srimar\
and sHcondar\ conHJ\rator\ circuits ,n tHrtiar\ and SHEElHcrusKinJ circuits, it is
normall\ unnHcHssar\ and taNHs tKH YaluH oI unit\ ,n IullscalH +3*5 circuits ZKHrH
IHHd si]Hs tHnd to EH coarsHr tKan usHd in laEorator\ and SilotscalH macKinHs, tKH
SaramHtHr Kas also EHHn Iound to imSroYH SrHdictiYH accurac\ 7KH SaramHtHr is
dHÀnHd E\ tKH IolloZinJ HTuation
0.2
Sc = Ks # ^ k1 # k2h-
ZKHrH
Ks is a macKinHsSHciÀc constant tKat taNHs tKH YaluH oI Ior conYHntional crusKHrs
and in tKH casH oI +3*5s
Ausgrind
/anH, )oJJiatto and %uHno 0 dHscriEHd a comminution mHtKodoloJ\ usinJ $usJrind
$usHnco·s inKousH mHtKod to dHsiJn comminution circuits 7KH SroJram t\Sicall\
usHs %ond :orN ,ndH[Hs, 60& 7Hsts andor -K':7s as inSut SaramHtHrs ,I ErHaNaJH
cKaractHrisation tHst ZorN Zas conductHd usinJ otKHr mHtKodoloJiHs sucK as 0ac3KHrson
or 63,, HmSirical IormulaH arH usHd to corrHlatH ZitK $usJrind modHl inSut SaramHtHrs
7KH JrindinJ circuit sSHciÀc HnHrJ\ is calculatHd usinJ tKH %ond Iormula and
an HIÀciHnc\ Iactor, I6$*, ZKicK is sSHciÀc to tKH sHlHctHd circuit conÀJuration and
orHdHSHndHnt 7KH HmSirical HTuations Ior dHtHrmininJ tKH HIÀciHnc\ Iactor I6$* in
$usJrind calculations ZHrH dHriYHd Irom $usHnco·s dataEasH %uHno and /anH, 0
7KH I6$* rHlationsKiSs ma\ also EH adMustHd ZKHn sHcondar\ crusKinJ or intHnsiYH
ElastinJ SracticHs arH in SlacH tKat is, Ior ÀnHr circuit IHHd si]Hs, F80 )iJurH sKoZs
tKH $usJrind I6$* rHlationsKiSs Ior diIIHrHnt circuit conÀJurations and IHHd si]Hs
7KH %ond sSHciÀc HnHrJ\ is calculatHd usinJ tKH &:i, &rusKinJ :orN ,ndH[ 5:i 5od
0ill :orN ,ndH[, and %:i to dHtHrminH tKH sSHciÀc HnHrJ\ rHTuirHmHnts oI a crusKHr
² rod mill ² Eall mill circuit Ior a Sroduct si]H P80 oI 0 μm as SHr tKH %ond IormulaH
ZitKout an\ corrHction Iactors listHd E\ %ond, 5oZland and otKHrs ,I tKH Sroduct si]H P80
is diIIHrHnt Irom 0 μm, tKH HnHrJ\ diIIHrHncH is calculatHd as SHr tKH %ond rHlationsKiS
7KH $usJrind total sSHciÀc HnHrJ\ calculation is dHscriEHd in tKH IolloZinJ HTuation
7otal (cs = >%ond (cs to 0 m
fSAG ² F80-HIIHct@ >%ond (cs to Ànal P80@
ZKHrH
7otal (cs is tKH circuit sSHciÀc HnHrJ\
%ond (cs is tKH sSHciÀc HnHrJ\ calculatHd as SHr tKH %ond rHlationsKiS
7KH EasH casH 6$* mill sSHciÀc HnHrJ\ is calculatHd as a Iunction oI orH comSHtHnc\ in
tKis casH mHasurHd E\ ':i &KanJH in ':i ErinJs a SroSortionatH cKanJH in 6$* (cs
$ sHriHs oI Iactors arH tKHn aSSliHd to adMust tKH EasH casH 6$* sSHciÀc HnHrJ\ Ior orH
JHotHcKnical SroSHrtiHs, tKH oSHratinJ conditions, mill dimHnsions Ior H[amSlH, asSHct
FIG 12.7 – Ausgrind fSAG and efficiency improvement due to size reduction (image courtesy Ausenco).
ratio and otKHrs 6omH oI tKHsH adMustinJ Iactors arH sKoZn in )iJurH 8 7KH 6$*
sSHciÀc HnHrJ\ calculation is dHscriEHd in tKH IolloZinJ HTuation
6$* (cs = >%asH &asH 6$* (cs@
>adMustinJ Iactors@
ZKHrH
6$* (cs is tKH 6$* mill sSHciÀc HnHrJ\
7KH SHEElH crusKHr sSHciÀc HnHrJ\ is calculatHd sHSaratHl\ and YHndor data is usHd Ior
HTuiSmHnt sHlHction 7KH Eall mill sSHciÀc HnHrJ\ is calculatHd as tKH rHsidual usinJ tKH
IolloZinJ HTuation
%all mill (cs = 7otal (cs ² 6$* (cs
)or circuits ZitKout a 6$* mill, tKH Eall mill sSHciÀc HnHrJ\ is HTual to tKH total
JrindinJ circuit sSHciÀc HnHrJ\ 6imilarl\, Ior circuits ZitKout Eall mills, tKH 6$* mill
sSHciÀc HnHrJ\ HTuals tKH total JrindinJ circuit sSHciÀc HnHrJ\ 0ill sKHll and motor si]H
sHlHction considHrs tKH sSHciÀc HnHrJ\ rHTuirHmHnts and tKH sSHciÀHd Slant tKrouJKSut,
toJHtKHr ZitK tKH H[SHctHd oSHratinJ HnYHloSH oI HacK mill
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Barratt, ' -, 8 $n uSdatH on tHstinJ, scalHuS and si]inJ HTuiSmHnt Ior autoJHnous and
sHmiautoJHnous JrindinJ circuits, in 3URFHHGLQJV$GYDQFHVLQ$XWRJHQRXVDQG6HPLDXWRJHQRXV
Grinding Technology (SAG 1989) Hds $ / 0ular and * ( $Jar, SS ² 8niYHrsit\ oI %ritisK
&olumEia 9ancouYHr
Barratt, ' - and $llan, 0 -, 8 7HstinJ Ior autoJHnous and sHmiautoJHnous JrindinJ a
dHsiJnHr·s Soint oI YiHZ, 0LQHUDOVDQG0HWDOOXUJLFDO3URFHVVLQJ, 80²
Bond, ) &, 7KH tKird tKHor\ oI comminution, 7UDQVDFWLRQRIWKH$,0(, 8²
Bond, ) &, :orN indH[Hs taEulatHd, 0LQLQJ(QJLQHHULQJ, ²
Bond, ) &, &rusKinJ and JrindinJ calculations, Sart ,, %ULWLVK&KHPLFDO(QJLQHHULQJ, 8²8
Bueno, 0 and /anH, *, 0 $ rHYiHZ oI 0 \Hars oI $*6$* Silot trials, in 3URFHHGLQJV
,QWHUQDWLRQDO $XWRJHQRXV *ULQGLQJ 6HPLDXWRJHQRXV *ULQGLQJ DQG +LJK 3UHVVXUH *ULQGLQJ 5ROO
Technology (SAG 2011) Hds K 0aMor, % & )lintoII, % KlHin and K 0c/Hod, 9ancouYHr
Burgess, ', 0 $ mHtKod oI calculatinJ autoJHnoussHmiautoJHnous JrindinJ mill sSHciÀc
HnHrJiHs usinJ a comEination oI %ond ZorN indicHs and -ulius KruttscKnitt SaramHtHrs, tKHn
aSSl\inJ HIÀciHnc\ Iactors, in 3URFHHGLQJV WK $XV,00 0LOO 2SHUDWRUV· &RQIHUHQFH, SS ²
7KH $ustralasian ,nstitutH oI 0ininJ and 0HtallurJ\ 0HlEournH
Dunne, 5, &KittHndHn, 5, /anH, * and 0orrHll, 6, 7KH &adia Jold coSSHr SroMHct H[Sloration
to startuS, SaSHr SrHsHntHd at 60( $nnual &onIHrHncH, 'HnYHr, 0arcK
Dunne, 5, 0orrHll, 6, /anH, *, 9alHr\, : and +art, 6, 00 'HsiJn oI tKH 0Ioot 6$* mill
installHd at tKH &adia Jold coSSHr minH, in 3URFHHGLQJV,QWHUQDWLRQDO&RQIHUHQFHRQ$XWRJHQRXV
DQG 6HPLDXWRJHQRXV *ULQGLQJ 7HFKQRORJ\ 6$* Hds ' - %arratt, 0 - $llan and
$ / 0ular, SS ² 8niYHrsit\ oI %ritisK &olumEia 9ancouYHr
Hart, 6, 9alHr\, :, &lHmHnts, %, 5HHd, 0, 6onJ, 0 and 'unnH, 5, 00 2Stimi]ation oI tKH
&adia +ill 6$* mill circuit, in 3URFHHGLQJV ,QWHUQDWLRQDO &RQIHUHQFH RQ $XWRJHQRXV DQG 6HPL
DXWRJHQRXV *ULQGLQJ 7HFKQRORJ\ 6$* Hds ' - %arratt, 0 - $llan and $ / 0ular,
SS ²0 8niYHrsit\ oI %ritisK &olumEia 9ancouYHr
Kosick, *, 'oEE\, * and %HnnHtt, &, 00 &((7 comminution Hconomic HYaluation tool Ior
comminution circuit dHsiJn and Sroduction SlanninJ, in 60($QQXDO0HHWLQJ, SrHSrint 0²
6ociHt\ Ior 0ininJ, 0HtallurJ\, and ([Sloration /ittlHton
Lane, *, )oJJiatto, % and %uHno, 0 3, 0 3oZHrEasHd comminution calculations usinJ
$usJrind, in 3URFHHGLQJV 7HQWK ,QWHUQDWLRQDO 0LQHUDO 3URFHVVLQJ &RQIHUHQFH (Procemin 2013)
Hds 0 $lYarH], $ 'oll, : KracKt and 5 Ku\YHnKoYHn, SS 8² *Hcamin
MacPherson, $ 5, 8 $ simSlH mHtKod to SrHdict tKH autoJHnous JrindinJ mill rHTuirHmHnts
Ior SrocHssinJ orH Irom a nHZ dHSosit, 7UDQVDFWLRQVRIWKH$,0(, ²0
Matthews, % ' and %arratt, ' -, *rindSoZHr comSutHr EasHd SroJram Ior tKH si]inJ and
sHlHction oI JrindinJ circuits, in 3URFHHGLQJV6HFRQG&DQDGLDQ&RQIHUHQFHRQ&RPSXWHU$SSOLFDWLRQV
LQWKH0LQHUDO,QGXVWU\ Hds 5 3oulin, 5 & 7 3aNalnis and $ / 0ular, SS ² &anadian
,nstitutH oI 0ininJ, 0HtallurJ\ and 3HtrolHum 0ontrHal
Morrell, 6, 00 3rHdictinJ tKH sSHciÀc HnHrJ\ oI autoJHnous and sHmiautoJHnous mills Irom
small diamHtHr drill corH samSlHs, 0LQHUDOV(QJLQHHULQJ, ²
Morrell, 6, 00 5ocN cKaractHrisation Ior KiJK SrHssurH JrindinJ rolls circuit dHsiJn, in 3URFHHGLQJV
,QWHUQDWLRQDO$XWRJHQRXVDQG6HPLDXWRJHQRXV*ULQGLQJ7HFKQRORJ\, 9ancouYHr, SS ²8
Morrell, 6, 00 3rHdictinJ tKH oYHrall sSHciÀc HnHrJ\ rHTuirHmHnt oI crusKinJ, KiJK SrHssurH
JrindinJ roll and tumElinJ mill circuits,0LQHUDOV(QJLQHHULQJ, ²
Morrell, 6, 00 3rHdictinJ tKH sSHciÀc HnHrJ\ rHTuirHd Ior si]H rHduction oI rHlatiYHl\ coarsH IHHds
in conYHntional crusKHrs and KiJK SrHssurH JrindinJ rolls, 0LQHUDOV(QJLQHHULQJ, ²
Morrell, 6, 0 8sinJ tKH 60& 7Hst® to SrHdict comminution circuit SHrIormancH >onlinH@
$YailaElH Irom <KttSZZZsmctHstinJcomdocumHnts8sinJBtKHB60&B7HstSdI!
>$ccHssHd $uJust 0@
Morrison, 5 ' and 5icKardson, - 0, 00 -K6im0Ht a simulator Ior anal\sis, oStimisation
and dHsiJn oI comminution circuits, in 0LQHUDO 3URFHVVLQJ 3ODQW 'HVLJQ 3UDFWLFH DQG &RQWURO
3URFHHGLQJV Hds $ / 0ular, ' 1 +alEH and ' - %arratt, SS ²0 6ociHt\ Ior 0ininJ,
0HtallurJ\, and ([Sloration /ittlHton
Napier-Munn, 7 -, 0orrHll, 6, 0orrison, 5 ' and KoMoYic, 7, 00 0LQHUDO&RPPLQXWLRQ&LUFXLWV
7KHLU2SHUDWLRQDQG2SWLPLVDWLRQ -ulius KruttscKnitt 0inHral 5HsHarcK &HntrH %risEanH
Rowland Jr, & $ and KMos, ' 0, 80 5od and Eall mills, in 0LQHUDO 3URFHVVLQJ 3ODQW 'HVLJQ
Hds $ / 0ular and 5 % %KaSSu, sHcond Hdition, cKaStHr 6ociHt\ Ior 0ininJ, 0HtallurJ\,
and ([Sloration /ittlHton
Siddall, % and 3utland, %, 00 3rocHss dHsiJn and imSlHmHntation tHcKniTuHs Ior sHcondar\
crusKinJ to incrHasH millinJ caSacit\, in 60( $QQXDO 0HHWLQJ, SrHSrint 0²0 6ociHt\ Ior
0ininJ, 0HtallurJ\, and ([Sloration /ittlHton
Starkey, - and 'oEE\, *, $SSlication oI tKH 0innoYH[ 6$* 3oZHr ,ndH[ at ÀYH &anadian
6$* Slants, in 3URFHHGLQJV,QWHUQDWLRQDO&RQIHUHQFHRQ$XWRJHQRXVDQG6HPLDXWRJHQRXV*ULQGLQJ
Technology (SAG 1996) Hds $ / 0ular, ' - %arratt and ' $ KniJKt, SS ²0 8niYHrsit\ oI
%ritisK &olumEia 9ancouYHr
Starkey, -, +indstrom, 6 and 1adasd\, *, 00 6$*'HsiJn tHstinJ ² ZKat it is and ZK\ it ZorNs,
in 3URFHHGLQJV,QWHUQDWLRQDO&RQIHUHQFHRQ$XWRJHQRXVDQG6HPLDXWRJHQRXV*ULQGLQJ7HFKQRORJ\
(SAG 2006) Hds 0 - $llan, K 0aMor, % & )lintoII, % KlHin and $ / 0ular, SS 0²
8niYHrsit\ oI %ritisK &olumEia 9ancouYHr
Chapter 13
MODELLING
COMMINUTION CIRCUITS
Hakan Dundar
INTRODUCTION
To carry out a simulation of a comminution circuit, the usual practice is to link the models
of each process unit together using a process model of each individual stream. A typical
simulation model of a stream contains, as an e[ample, the ÁoZ rates of each component
of interest. )or instance, typical components might Ee the ÁoZ rates of the Zater and the
mass for each si]e fraction of ore. )or convenience, the user interface might shoZ the total
mass ÁoZ of the dry solids, per cent solids and the si]e distriEution of the ore in per cent
retained. +ence to simulate the ÁoZ sheet, start Ey converting the feed stream into ÁoZ
rates Ey si]e and Zater ÁoZ. As ÁoZ rates can simply Ee added at a node, the Eall mill
product from the last iteration can Ee added to the feed stream Zith additional Zater if
reTuired and the total ÁoZ passed to the hydrocyclone model as its feed stream. ,n this
manner, a complete circuit simulation can be carried out and iterated to a numerical steady
state. This simulation strategy is called ‘sequential modular’. Another effective strategy is
to split the recycle streams into an input and an output version and iterate the circuit
until the tZo streams match. This strategy is called ‘tearing’. 0ular and 5ichardson
provide a good description of various strategies for simulation. The rest of this chapter
describes some typical models and hoZ their parameters can be ‘Àtted’ or derived from
measured data.
considers the mill as a perfectly mi[ed volume Zhere breakage occurs and the product
discharged from the mill is a function of the particle size. As shoZn in )igure .,
continuous breakage of the particles in a mill can be deÀned as
x breakage of the coarser particles into a particular size fraction
x further breakage of the particles in the particular size fraction
x particles at a particular size comes into the system Zith the neZ feed
x discharge of the particular size from the mill.
For a particular size fraction of i, transport into a breakage zone, breakage and transport
out for continuous milling is represented in Figure ..
A simple mass balance equation can be Zritten for a particular size fraction of i as
folloZs
i
pi = fi + / aijrjs j - risi ;i $ j .
j=1
Zhere
pi is the amount of i size product from the mill
fi is the amount of i size material in neZ feed
aij is the breakage function (generation of i size material after the breakage of coarser
j size material)
rj is the breakage rate of j size
sj is the amount of j size material Zithin the mill
ri is the breakage rate of i size
si is the amount of i size material Zithin the mill
The product from the mill is deÀned as a function of size. ,f the mill content is knoZn,
the product can be calculated using the folloZing equation (di is the discharge rate for
the i size material)
pi = di $ si (.)
FIG 13.1 – Product generation in a population balance model (image courtesy Tim Napier-Munn).
,n most of the cases Zhere the mill content cannot be measured, the ratio rd can be
calculated for the given feed and product size distributions, and the breakage function.
The rd is regarded as tonnes per hour broken per tonne in the mill. The equations
beloZ shoZ the mass balances around some size intervals
r1 r
For i p1 = f1 + >a1,1 p1H - 1 p1
d1 d1
r1 r r
For i p2 = f2 + >a2, 1 p1 + a2, 2 2 p2H - 2 p2
d1 d2 d2
$ $
$ $
$ $
r1 r2 r r
For i = n p n = fn + >a n, 1 p +a p + g + a n, n n p nH - n p n (.)
d1 1 n, 2 d2 2 dn dn
2nly the rd parameters need to be knoZn to provide a complete Zay of calculating
the product sizes from a feed sizing and a suitable appearance function. This Zill be
demonstrated in the example given in the section titled ‘Fitting example for ball mill –
hydrocyclone circuit’.
ϭϬϬ
/ĚĞĂů
ϵϬ
ƐĞƉĂƌĂƚŝŽŶ ZĞĂů
ϴϬ
ƐĞƉĂƌĂƚŝŽŶ
ϳϬ
ƉĂƌƚŝƚŝŽŶй
ϲϬ
ϱϬ
ϰϬ
ϯϬ
ϮϬ
&ŝƐŚ,ŽŽŬ
ϭϬ
LJƉĂƐƐ
Ϭ
G
ϭ ϭϬ ϭϬϬ ϭϬϬϬ
ŵĞĂŶƉĂƌƚŝĐůĞƐŝnjĞ;PŵͿ
FIG 13.2 – A typical partition curve for classifiers showing the parameters (image courtesy Hakan Dundar).
Whiten (1966) modelled the partition curve with the following equation:
R V
S 1 + b $ b) $ di $ a W
S f
d50c ]e - 1g W
p
Pi = 100 - R S W
S )
a$b $ i
d
W
S e d +e -2
50c
a
W
T X
where:
R indicates the bypass of the separator
a is the sharpness of the separation
ǃ LVWKHÀVKKRRNEHKDYLRXURIWKHFODVVLÀFDWLRQ
di is the mean particle size
d50c is the corrected cut size
ǃ* is the parameter that protects the d50c; that is, for Pi = 0.5(100-R) then di = d50c. Bypass
PHDQVWKHSURSRUWLRQRIWKHIHHGWKDWLVQRWFODVVLÀHGDQGLVVLPSO\WUDQVIHUUHGWRWKH
FRDUVHXQGHUÁRZSURGXFW$W\SLFDOK\GURF\FORQHE\SDVVLVSHUFHQWWRSHUFHQW
The sharpness of the separation ǂLVUHSUHVHQWHGE\WKHOLQHDUVHFWLRQLQ)LJXUH
,WLVUHDGIURPWKHHIÀFLHQF\FXUYHDQGLVW\SLFDOO\WZRWR$QLGHDOVHSDUDWLRQZRXOG
have an ǂYDOXHRIWHQRUJUHDWHUKRZHYHUZKHQWKHÀVKKRRNHIIHFWLVSUHVHQWWKHǃ
value interacts with the ǂ value.
7KHÀVKKRRNREVHUYHGLQWKHÀQHHQGRIWKHSDUWLWLRQFXUYHLVWKHSRUWLRQRIWKHYHU\
ÀQHSDUWLFOHVLQIHHGUHSRUWLQJWKHFRDUVHSURGXFW7KHÀVKKRRNLVUHSUHVHQWHGE\WKH
parameter ‘ǃ·LQWKH:KLWHQHIÀFLHQF\FXUYHPRGHODQGLWLVEDFNFDOFXODWHGE\GDWDÀW
8QOLNHWKHE\SDVVWKHǃ does not indicate a real value that is shown on the curve; it only
FRUUHVSRQGVWRWKDWYDOXH,IWKHUHLVQRÀVKKRRNǃ is zero. In some cases it can go up
to three or four.
7KLVPRGHOFDQEHH[WHQGHGWRK\GURF\FORQHFODVVLÀHUVXVLQJWKHDSSURDFKRI/\QFK
and Rao (1975).
FIG 13.3 – Ball mill – hydrocyclone flow sheet and mass balanced tonnages.
Water is added at the sump (image courtesy Hakan Dundar).
TABLE 13.1
Mass-balanced size distributions around the circuit.
Cumulative passing %
Size range class Hydrocyclone Hydrocyclone Hydrocyclone Ball mill
(μm) feed overflow underflow discharge
-3350/+2360 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00
-2360/+1700 98.95 99.99 98.64 99.61
-1700/+1180 97.28 99.95 96.51 99.30
-1180/+850 94.46 99.89 92.90 98.80
-850/+600 91.37 99.82 88.95 98.06
-600/+425 88.21 99.77 84.91 96.80
-425/+300 84.52 99.71 80.19 94.38
-300/+212 79.11 99.55 73.29 89.43
-212/+150 73.08 99.38 65.59 83.29
-150/+106 63.27 99.22 53.04 71.99
-106/+74 51.10 97.49 37.89 57.45
-74/+53 38.35 89.91 23.68 42.06
-53/+38 29.29 78.48 15.00 31.32
-38/+25.5 23.31 66.76 10.05 24.41
-25.5/+18 19.45 56.97 7.40 20.04
-18/+12.5 16.56 48.32 5.75 16.94
-12.5/+9 14.33 41.90 4.55 14.56
-9 12.46 36.67 3.40 12.45
TABLE 13.2
Calculation of the f and p values for each size class.
Size range class (μm) Size interval, i fi (t/h) pi (t/h)
-3350/+2360 1 2.44 = (100 – 98.64)/100 × 179.3 0.70 = (100 – 99.61)/100 × 179.3
-2360/+1700 2 3.82 = (98.64 – 96.51)/100 × 179.3 0.56 = (99.61 – 99.30)/100 × 179.3
-1700/+1180 3 6.47 0.90
-1180/+850 4 7.08 1.33
-850/+600 5 7.24 2.26
-600/+425 6 8.46 4.34
-425/+300 7 12.37 8.88
-300/+212 8 13.81 11.01
-212/+150 9 22.50 20.26
-150/+106 10 27.16 26.07
-106/+74 11 25.48 27.59
-74/+53 12 15.56 19.26
-53/+38 13 8.88 12.39
-38/+25.5 14 4.75 7.84
-25.5/+18 15 2.96 5.56
-18/+12.5 16 2.15 4.27
-12.5/+9 17 2.06 3.78
-9 Subsieve 6.10 22.32
Total 179.3 179.3
TABLE 13.3
Size-independent breakage function.
i j 1 2 . . 14 15 16 17
1 0
2 0.193 0
3 0.157 0.193 .
4 0.126 0.157 .
5 0.101 0.126 .
6 0.082 0.101 .
7 0.066 0.082 .
8 0.053 0.066 .
9 0.043 0.053 .
10 0.035 0.043 .
11 0.028 0.035 .
12 0.022 0.028 .
13 0.018 0.022 . .
14 0.015 0.018 . . 0
TABLE 13.4
Calculation of r/d values for each size class using mass balance equation.
Size interval, i ri/di Mass balance equation for the given feed and product
particle size distribution and breakage function
r r
1 2.49 0.70 = 2.44 + <0 $ 1
d
$ 0.70F - d
1
$ 0.70
1 1
r r
2 6.42 0.56 = 3.82 + <0.193 $ 2.49 $ 0.70 + 0 $ d
2
$ 0.56F - 2
d
$ 0.56
2 2
3 7.26
4 5.86
5 3.60
6 1.90
7 0.85
8 0.66
9 0.35
Similar calculations to sizing interval -1700/+9 μm
10 0.24
11 0.11
12 0.05
13 0.04
14 0.02
15 0.011
16 0.008
r r
17 0.006 3.78 = 2.06 + <0.008 $ 2.49 $ 0.70 + 0.010 $ 6.42 $ 0.56 + g + 0 $ d
17
$ 3.78F - 17
d
$ 3.78
17 17
The operating variables of the mill have an impact on the breakage rate. Depending on
the operating variables the rd curve shifts upZards, doZnZards, leftZards, rightZards
and so on. Therefore a smooth rd curve is required for simulation purposes. 6ince it
is not possible to deÀne the rd curve Zith one unique equation, cubic spline function
is used to obtain a smooth curve. 6imply, three or four data points on the curve are
determined and used as an input to the cubic spline function. The data points are varied
in order to achieve the best Àt. Figure . gives the smoothed (Àtted) rd curve after
cubic spline. An example of calculating a cubic spline function is provided in 1apier
0unnHWDO (). Table . gives the calculated and Àtted rd values.
ϭϬ
ϭ
ƌͬĚ
Ϭ͘ϭ
Ϭ͘Ϭϭ
DƌͬĚ
Ϭ͘ϬϬϭ
ϭϬ ϭϬϬ ϭϬϬϬ ϭϬϬϬϬ
ŵĞĂŶƉĂƌƚŝĐůĞƐŝnjĞ;PŵͿ
ϭϬ
ϭ
ƌͬĚ
Ϭ͘ϭ
Ϭ͘Ϭϭ ĐĂůĐƵůĂƚĞĚƌͬĚ
ĨŝƚƚĞĚƌͬĚ
Ϭ͘ϬϬϭ
ϭϬ ϭϬϬ ϭϬϬϬ ϭϬϬϬϬ
ŵĞĂŶƉĂƌƚŝĐůĞƐŝnjĞ;PŵͿ
TABLE 13.5
Calculated and fitted r/d values.
Size interval, i Calculated ri/di Fitted ri/di
1 2.49 2.80
2 6.42 6.30
3 7.26 8.00
4 5.86 6.44
5 3.60 3.64
6 1.90 2.07
7 0.85 1.17
8 0.66 0.66
9 0.35 0.37
10 0.24 0.21
11 0.11 0.12
12 0.05 0.07
According to the Àtted rd values the product from the ball mill is backcalculated to
check the Àt quality. Table . gives the calculation steps of the product and the results
are plotted in Figure ..
As can be seen from Figure . the predicted product size distribution is a bit coarser
than the experimental one at Àne sizes. This results from the poor Àtting of rd at Àne
sizes in Figure ..
Hydrocyclone fitting
The actual and corrected partition curves for the hydrocyclone are calculated as
discussed in previous sections (Table .). 3artition curves Zere plotted starting from
TABLE 13.6
Prediction of the product using fitted r/d.
Size interval, i Calculated pi Mass balance equation for the given feed particle
(t/h) size distribution, breakage function and fitted r/d
1 0.64 p1 = 2.44 + [0 $ 2.80 $ p1] - 2.80 $ p1
3 0.83
4 1.23
5 2.25
6 4.12
7 8.02
8 11.84
9 20.90
Similar calculations to sizing interval -1700/+9 μm
10 27.81
11 28.47
12 20.04
13 13.33
14 8.68
15 6.24
16 4.84
17 4.24 p17 = 2.06 + [0.008 $ 2.80 $ 0.64 + 0.010 $ 6.30 $ 0.57 + g + 0 $ 0.004 $ p17] - 0.004 $ p17
17
Subsieve 15.27 = 179.3 - / pi
i=1
ϭϬϬ
ϵϬ
ϴϬ
ϳϬ
ƉĂƐƐŝŶŐй ϲϬ
ϱϬ
ϰϬ
ϯϬ
ϮϬ DĚŝƐĐŚ͘
ϭϬ ĐĂůĐ͘DĚŝƐĐŚ͘
Ϭ
ϭ ϭϬ ϭϬϬ ϭϬϬϬ ϭϬϬϬϬ
FIG 13.6 – Experimental and calculated (predicted) product size distributions (image courtesy Hakan Dundar).
TABLE 13.7
Actual and corrected partitions.
Size class (μm) Mean size Partition (Uu/Ff) Corrected partition
-3350/+2360 2811.76 = 3350 # 2360 100.00 100.00
-2360/+1700 2003.00 99.30 98.80
-1700/+1180 1416.33 99.67 99.43
-1180/+850 1001.50 99.52 99.17
-850/+600 714.14 99.54 99.21
-600/+425 504.98 99.59 99.29
-425/+300 357.07 99.30 98.80
-300/+212 252.19 99.42 99.00
-212/+150 178.33 99.60 99.31
-150/+106 126.10 96.92 94.70
-106/+75 89.16 86.77 77.23
-75/+53 63.05 74.59 56.27
-53/+38 44.88 64.45 38.81
-38/+25.5 31.13 53.45 19.88
-25.5/+18 21.42 44.45 4.39
-18/+12.5 15.00 41.90 0.00
-12.5/+9 10.61 47.88 10.29
microns to eliminate the scatter at coarser sizes (Figure .). As can be seen
from Figure . the bypass of the hydrocyclone exceeds per cent and dc is less
than microns.
The actual partition curve is then Àtted to an efÀciency curve model to backcalculate
the model parameters such as ǂ, ǃ and ǃ
by iterative solution. Table . gives the
calculation of the Àtted partition curve using model parameters. Figure . gives the
actual and Àtted partition curves for the hydrocyclone.
ϭϬϬ
ϵϬ
ϴϬ
ϳϬ 3350 ) 2360
ƉĂƌƚŝƚŝŽŶ й
ϲϬ
ϱϬ
ϰϬ
ϯϬ
ϮϬ ĂĐƚƵĂů
ϭϬ ĐŽƌƌĞĐƚĞĚ
Ϭ
ϭ ϭϬ ϭϬϬ ϭϬϬϬ
ŵĞĂŶƉĂƌƚŝĐůĞƐŝnjĞ;PŵͿ
FIG 13.7 – Actual and corrected partition curves for the hydrocyclone (image courtesy Hakan Dundar).
TABLE 13.8
Fitted partition curve and model parameters.
Mean size Fitted partition Fitted parameters
R V R = 41.90
S b1 + 1.65 $ 3.40 $ 2811.76 l $ ^e 0.64 - 1h W
100.00 = 100 - 41.90 $ S
56.52 W α = 0.64
2811.76 S 2811.76 W
S e0.64 $ 3.40 $ 56.52 + e0.64 - 2 W β = 1.65
T X β* = 3.40
2003.00 100.00 d50c = 56.52
1416.33 100.00
1001.50 100.00
714.14 100.00
504.98 100.00
357.07 100.00
252.19 99.94
178.33 99.27
R V
S b1 + 1.65 $ 3.40 $ 126.10 l $ ^e 0.64 - 1h W
S 56.52 W
126.10 96.04 = 100 - 41.90 $
S 0.64 $ 3.40 $ 126.10 W
S e 0.64
56.52 + e - 2 W
T X
89.16 88.01
63.05 75.71
44.88 62.91
31.13 52.16
21.42 46.08
15.00 44.29
10.61 44.96
The sharpness of the efÀciency curve is Zidely used to assess the performance of the
separation; hoZever, the correlation betZeen the operating variables and the model
parameters should be assessed in order to use it for simulation purposes.
ϭϬϬ
ϵϬ
ϴϬ
ƉĂƌƚŝƚŝŽŶ й ϳϬ
ϲϬ
ϱϬ
ϰϬ
ϯϬ
ϮϬ ĂĐƚƵĂů
ϭϬ ĨŝƚƚĞĚ
Ϭ
ϭ ϭϬ ϭϬϬ ϭϬϬϬ
ŵĞĂŶƉĂƌƚŝĐůĞƐŝnjĞ;PŵͿ
FIG 13.8 – Actual and fitted partition curves (image courtesy Hakan Dundar).
CONCLUSIONS
The techniques outlined in this chapter provide poZerful tools for modelling and
optimising simple existing circuits based on Zellmeasured data. The use of such models
for design requires a substantial collection of measured data (or orespeciÀc pilot plant
data) and extensive experience in operations as Zell as modelling of comminution
processes.
For complex circuits, ÁoZ sheet based systems Zith integrated data analysis and
modelling capabilities are available commercially. Training in hoZ to use these systems
is also essential.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Lynch, A - and 5ao, T &, . 0odelling and scale up of hydrocyclone classiÀers, in PURcHHdiQJV
;,,QWHUQDWiRQDO0iQHUDOPURcHVViQJ&RQJUHVV, &aglari, paper .
Mular, A / and 5ichardson, - 0, . 0etallurgical balances, in 'HViJQ DQd ,QVWDOODWiRQ RI
&RQcHQWUDWiRQDQd'HZDWHUiQJ&iUcXiWV, chapter , pp – (6ociety for 0ining, 0etallurgy,
and (xploration /ittleton).
Napier-Munn, T -, 0orrell, 6, 0orrison, 5 D and .ojovic, T, . 0iQHUDO&RPPiQXWiRQ&iUcXiWV
7KHiU2SHUDWiRQDQd2SWiPiVDWiRQ, p (-ulius .ruttschnitt 0ineral 5esearch &entre Brisbane).
Whiten, : -, . /ecture notes for :inter 6chool on 0ineral 3rocessing, Department of 0ining
and 0etallurgical (ngineering, University of 4ueensland (unpublished).
Whiten, : -, . A matrix theory of comminution machines, &KHP(QJ6ci, –.
Whiten, : -, . Ball mill simulation using small calculators, 7KH$XV,00PURcHHdiQJV, –.
Chapter 14
PROCESS CONTROL
Bob Yench, Gunter Metzner and Alban Lynch
INTRODUCTION
Every process plant involves process control. Process control can be manual, automatic
or, as is usually the case, a mixture of both. The process engineer designs the process
to meet the production requirements of the plant. It is then arranged into a coherent
SODQW IRUPDW DV GHSLFWHG E\ WKH SURFHVV ÁRZ GLDJUDP 3)' 7KH SULPDU\ DLP RI
SURFHVVFRQWUROLVWRPD[LPLVHHIÀFLHQF\LQWKHSURFHVVZKLFKFDQEHGHÀQHGDVVDIHO\
DFKLHYLQJPD[LPXPSURGXFWLRQDWPLQLPXPFRVWZLWKPLQLPXP¶RIIVSHF·SURGXFW
,QGHFLGLQJZKLFKRSHUDWLRQVZLWKLQWKHSODQWZLOOEHPDQXDOO\RSHUDWHGDQGZKLFK
ZLOO EH XQGHU DXWRPDWLF FRQWURO WKH SURFHVV HQJLQHHU ² SHUKDSV LQ FRQVXOWDWLRQ ZLWK
SODQWRSHUDWRUVDQGLQVWUXPHQWHQJLQHHUV²ZLOOZHLJKXSPDQ\IDFWRUVLQFOXGLQJWKH
FULWLFDOLW\RIWKDWSRUWLRQRIWKHSURFHVVDKLJKFULWLFDOLW\SRLQWVWRDXWRPDWLFFRQWURO
DQGWKHQHHGIRUWKHRSHUDWRUWRPDLQWDLQDKDQGVRQIHHOIRUWKHSURFHVVZKHUHDKLJK
QHHGSRLQWVWRPDQXDOFRQWURO,GHDOO\RSHUDWLQJPHWDOOXUJLVWVVKRXOGIROORZWKHSODQW
FRQWUROV\VWHPGHYHORSPHQWIURPFRQFHSWWRFRPPLVVLRQLQJDQGEH\RQG7KH\QHHG
WRKDYHHQRXJKNQRZOHGJHWRDVNSHUWLQHQWTXHVWLRQVWKURXJKRXWWKLVSURFHVVEHFDXVH
the plant control system is the single most important tool available in getting the best
RXWRIWKHSODQW8QIRUWXQDWHO\IHZPHWDOOXUJLVWVDUHJLYHQWKHRSSRUWXQLW\WRWDNHD
FRQWURO V\VWHP IURP FRQFHSW WR RSHUDWLRQ ZLWK GHVLJQ DQG LPSOHPHQWDWLRQ QRUPDOO\
handled by a separate project team and then given to operations.
)LJXUH VKRZV WKH OD\HUV LQ FRQWURO IXQFWLRQV 6RPH RI WKH IXQFWLRQV LQ WKH
OD\HUVDUHSHUIRUPHGDXWRPDWLFDOO\ZKLOHRWKHUVDUHSHUIRUPHGPDQXDOO\E\SHRSOH
At the top of the hierarchy of controls for a grinding circuit is, for example, senior
PDQDJHPHQWDQGDWWKHERWWRPLVÀHOGLQVWUXPHQWDWLRQ7KHEDVHRIWKHKLHUDUFK\LV
the grinding circuit.
Plant operators and metallurgists are often required to operate over several layers
RI WKH KLHUDUFK\ RI FRQWUROV SDUWLFXODUO\ LQ D SODQW ZLWK PLQLPDO SURFHVV FRQWURO DQG
DXWRPDWLRQ6LQFHWKHFRQWUROV\VWHPLVWKHSULPDU\WRROIRUPDQDJLQJWKHRSHUDWLRQRI
WKHSODQWPHWDOOXUJLVWVPXVWKDYHNQRZOHGJHDQGSUDFWLFDOVNLOOLQDQXPEHURIDUHDV
LQFOXGLQJ
x the process that is being controlled
x ÀHOGLQVWUXPHQWDWLRQDQGDFWXDWRUV
x relevant process control techniques and skills; for example, loop tuning
x capability of the plant control systems; for example, distributed control system
'&6
0DQDJLQJ RSHUDWLQJ DQG PDLQWDLQLQJ D SODQW SURFHVV FRQWURO V\VWHP LV D WHDP
EDVHG XQGHUWDNLQJ UHTXLULQJ NQRZOHGJH LQ SURFHVV FRQWURO WHFKQLTXHV DQG ÀHOG
LQVWUXPHQWDWLRQDVZHOODVVNLOOVLQSURJUDPPLQJGDWDDQDO\VLVDQGRSHUDWRUWUDLQLQJ
,QDGGLWLRQWKHSODQWPHWDOOXUJLVWPXVWKDYHWKHSURFHVVFRQWURONQRZOHGJHWRHQVXUH
process performance is optimised.
PROCESS MEASUREMENT
To control a process it must be possible to measure relevant parameters of the process.
7KHVH FRPPRQO\ LQFOXGH ÁRZ WHPSHUDWXUH SUHVVXUH DQG GHQVLW\ IRU YDULRXV SDUWV
RIWKHSURFHVV)RUPDQ\RIWKHVHSDUDPHWHUVWKHUHZLOOEHDFKRLFHRIPHDVXUHPHQW
techniques, so it pays to take care in selecting the best device for the purpose. It is
critical that issues such as sizing, materials, environmental protection, installation
requirements and access for maintenance are fully considered for each installation.
2QO\ZKHQDOORIWKHVHPDWWHUVDUHFRQVLGHUHGZLOOWKHUHEHFRQÀGHQFHLQORQJWHUP
reliable and repeatable measurements.
Process measurement techniques do not focus on ultimate accuracy. Good accuracy
is important but repeatability is essential. Repeatable measurements provide the
FRQWUROV\VWHPZLWKLQIRUPDWLRQIRUDVWDEOHRSHUDWLRQ,WLVDFRPPRQPLVFRQFHSWLRQ
DPRQJSODQWRSHUDWRUVWKDWIRUH[DPSOHLI\RXDUHZHLJKLQJPLOOIHHGRQDFRQYH\RU
ZHLJKWRPHWHUWKHWRWDOWRQQHVFDQEHXVHGIRUPHWDOEDODQFHDFFRXQWLQJRUFXVWRG\
transfer purposes. In general, a different class of instrumentation is required for these
purposes.
Flow measurement
6LQFH ÁRZ LV RQH RI WKH PRVW FRPPRQ PHDVXUHPHQWV UHTXLUHG LQ PLQHUDO SURFHVVLQJ
DQGWKHUHLVDZLGHYDULDWLRQLQSULQFLSOHVHPSOR\HGZKDWIROORZVLVDVKRUWGLVFXVVLRQ
RQVRPHFRPPRQÁRZPHDVXUHPHQWSULQFLSOHV
7KHIROORZLQJ¶FRQWLQXRXV·ÁRZPHDVXUHPHQWGHYLFHVDQGWHFKQLTXHVDUHFRPPRQO\
XVHGIRUSURFHVVPHDVXUHPHQWDQGFRQWURO$OOFRQWLQXRXVÁRZPHDVXUHPHQWWHFKQLTXHV
DUH DSSOLFDWLRQVSHFLÀF DQG UHTXLUH FDUHIXO VHOHFWLRQ VL]LQJ DQG SRVLWLRQLQJ LQ WKH
SURFHVVWRDFKLHYHWKHLUGHVLJQVSHFLÀFDWLRQV7KHUHDUHDOVRSRVLWLYHGLVSODFHPHQWÁRZ
PHDVXUHPHQWGHYLFHVVXFKDVGRVLQJSXPSVRUSDGGOHW\SHÁRZPHWHUVZKLFKDUHPRUH
commonly used in chemical dosing or batch systems.
0DJnHtLFÁoZPHtHU²FRPPRQO\XVHGIRUFRQGXFWLYHOLTXLGVVXFKDVZDWHURUPLQHUDO
VOXUU\ 7KH FRQGXFWLYH OLTXLG ÁRZLQJ WKURXJK DQ HOHFWURPDJQHWLF ÀHOG FUHDWHV DQ
HOHFWULFDORXWSXWWKDWLVSURSRUWLRQDOWRWKHDYHUDJHÁRZUDWH,WPXVWEHLQVWDOOHGLQD
ULVLQJOLQHWRHQVXUHDIXOOSLSHDQGKDVDQRUPDOÁRZUDQJHWXUQGRZQRI
2ULÀFHSODtH²XVHGRQJDVHVDQGQRQDEUDVLYHOLTXLGV7KHSODWHREVWUXFWVWKHÁRZDQG
FUHDWHVDSUHVVXUHGURSWKDWLVSURSRUWLRQDOWRWKHÁRZUDWH,WPXVWEHRQDULVLQJOLQHIRU
OLTXLGDSSOLFDWLRQVDQGKDVDQRUPDOÁRZUDQJHWXUQGRZQRI
$YHUDJLnJSLtot²XVHGRQJDVHVDQGFOHDQOLTXLGV7KLVFRQVLVWVRIDKROORZEDULQVWDOOHG
across a diameter of the process pipe. The bar creates a pressure drop proportional to
WKHÁRZUDWH6XSSOLHUVFODLPWXUQGRZQFDSDELOLW\EXWLQSUDFWLFHWKLVLVGLIÀFXOWWR
DFKLHYHEHFDXVHRIWKHORZGLIIHUHQWLDOSUHVVXUHJHQHUDWHGE\WKHVHGHYLFHV
9oUtH[ÁoZPHtHU²WKHPRVWFRPPRQW\SHRIYRUWH[PHWHULQWKHPLQHUDOSURFHVVLQJ
LQGXVWU\LVWKHYRUWH[VKHGGLQJGHYLFHZKLFKXWLOLVHVDVSHFLDOO\VKDSHGEDUDFURVVWKH
GLDPHWHURIWKHSLSHWR¶VKHG·YRUWLFHVLQWKHÁRZLQJOLTXLG7KHVHYRUWLFHVDUHGHWHFWHG
E\VHQVRUVRQWKHEDFNRIWKHVKHGGHUEDU7KH\DUHUHODWLYHO\FKHDSDQGUREXVWZLWK
D JRRG WXUQGRZQ EXW DUH QRW VXLWDEOH IRU YLVFRXV RU GLUW\ ÁXLGV 7KH\ DUH JHQHUDOO\
XQVXLWDEOHIRUOLQHVODUJHUWKDQPPGLDPHWHU
&oULoOLV PHtHU ² D UHODWLYHO\ UHFHQW GHYLFH WKDW LV FDSDEOH RI PHDVXULQJ PDVV ÁRZ RI
OLTXLGV VOXUULHV DQG KLJKSUHVVXUH JDVHV ZLWK D ODUJH GHJUHH RI DFFXUDF\ DQG D WXUQ
GRZQRI7KHÁXLGSDVVHVWKURXJKDWXEHWKDWLVVXEMHFWHGWRDYLEUDWLQJIRUFHDQG
WKHUHVLVWDQFHWRWKHYLEUDWLQJIRUFHLVSURSRUWLRQDOWRWKHPDVVÁRZRIÁXLGWKURXJKWKH
WXEHV,WLVOLPLWHGWRDPD[LPXPRIDURXQGPPGLDPHWHUOLQHDQGLVEHVWVXLWHG
to clean liquids.
CONTROL ELEMENTS
7KHFRQWUROV\VWHP¶SURFHVVHV·WKHLQSXWVLJQDOVIURPWKHPHDVXUHPHQWGHYLFHVDSSOLHV
the logic that is programmed into its processors and then sends signals out to the plant
¶FRQWUROHOHPHQWV·WRFRQWLQXHRUPRGLI\WKHSURFHVVRSHUDWLRQ0RVWFRPPRQO\WKHVH
DFWXDWRUVIDOOLQWRRQHRIWZRFDWHJRULHVYDULDEOHVSHHGGULYHVRUDFWXDWRUVIRUYDOYHVRU
dampers. Variable speed drives are used to control conveyors, mills, pumps and fans
ZKLOHDFWXDWRUVFRQWUROYDOYHDQGGDPSHUSRVLWLRQVWRYDU\WKHÁRZRIÁXLGVDQGJDVHV
$VKRUWGLVFXVVLRQRQWKHUROHRIDFWXDWRUVLQDSURFHVVSODQWIROORZV
Actuators
Processes are regulated by applying a control signal to an actuator in the process.
7KHÁRZRIOLTXLGVRUJDVHVLQWKHSURFHVVSLSHZRUNPD\EHUHJXODWHGE\DFRQWURO
valve that is automatically positioned by the control system. In every case a device
DFWXDWRULVUHTXLUHGWRDPSOLI\WKHORZOHYHOFRQWUROVLJQDOWRDOHYHOWKDWFDQFRQWURO
WKHSURFHVV7KHSRZHUVRXUFHIRUDFWXDWRUVFDQEHSQHXPDWLFFRPSUHVVHGDLULVPRVW
FRPPRQK\GUDXOLFRUHOHFWULF
0RVWYDOYHVZLWKDFWXDWRUVDUHDOVRÀWWHGZLWKDFXUUHQWWRSQHXPDWLFYDOYHSRVLWLRQHU
This device regulates the supply of air to the actuator in response to an electrical current
signal from the control system. It also incorporates mechanical feedback to ensure that
WKHDFWXDWRULVSRVLWLRQHGLQSURSRUWLRQWRWKHFXUUHQWVLJQDO7ZRW\SHVRIDLUDFWXDWRU
are available.
&\OLnGHU DFtXDtoUV ² WKLV DFWXDWRU LV QRZ WKH PRVW FRPPRQO\ XVHG DLU DFWXDWRU LQ
WKH SURFHVV LQGXVWULHV 7KH SRVLWLRQLQJ IRUFH LV FUHDWHG E\ D SLVWRQ RSHUDWLQJ ZLWKLQ
D F\OLQGHU 7KH\ DUH JHQHUDOO\ GRXEOH DFWLQJ ZKHUH VXSSO\ SUHVVXUH DLU LV DSSOLHG WR
HDFKHQGRIWKHF\OLQGHU7KH\UHVSRQGTXLFNO\DUHKLJKO\SRZHUIXODQGDUHVLPSOHWR
FRQVWUXFWDVZHOODVEHLQJHDV\WRPDLQWDLQDQGFDOLEUDWH
'LDSKUDJPDFtXDtoUV²WKHVHZHUHSRSXODULQWKHHDUOLHUGD\VRISQHXPDWLFWUDQVPLVVLRQ
ZKHUHWKHVLJQDOZDVSUHVHQWHGGLUHFWO\WRWKHGLDSKUDJPZLWKRXWDQ\FRQYHUVLRQRU
DPSOLÀFDWLRQ7KHIRUFHFUHDWHGE\WKHGLDSKUDJPLVRSSRVHGE\DVXEVWDQWLDOVSULQJE\
ZKLFKPHDQVWKHVKDIWWDNHVXSDSRVLWLRQLQSURSRUWLRQWRWKHVLJQDOSUHVVXUH$VHSDUDWH
,3FXUUHQWWRSQHXPDWLFFRQYHUWHUPXVWEHXVHGLIDIHHGEDFNSRVLWLRQHULVQRWÀWWHG
(OHFtULFDFtXDtoUV²WKHVHDUHFRPPRQLQWKHSRZHULQGXVWU\$QHOHFWULFPRWRUSRZHUHG
by mains voltage is used as the driving component. This motor is reversible and is
controlled by a converter/positioner using mechanical feedback. Electric actuators are
uncommon in the process industries due to their high initial cost.
9DOYHV²WKHVHGHYLFHVLQVRPHIRUPDUHWKHSULPDU\SURFHVVFRQWUROGHYLFHLQWKHSURFHVV
industries. There are many types of valves available, and industry itself has an even
JUHDWHUQXPEHURIGLIIHUHQWDSSOLFDWLRQVIRUWKHVHGHYLFHV7KH\IDOOLQWRWZRFDWHJRULHV
on/off valves or regulatory valves. The interests of the measurement and control industry
DUHODUJHO\FRQÀQHGWRWKRVHRQRIIRUUHJXODWRU\YDOYHVWKDWDUHRSHUDWHGE\DUHPRWHO\
JHQHUDWHGVLJQDODQGQRWKDQGRSHUDWHG7KHPDMRUW\SHVRIYDOYHVXVHGLQWKHSURFHVV
LQGXVWULHVLQFOXGHEDOOEXWWHUÁ\JOREHGLDSKUDJPSLQFKSOXJDQGJDWHYDOYHV(DFKLV
suited to a particular range of applications according to the process conditions. A poor
choice in valve type, sizing, construction materials or positioning in the process for
DQ\ JLYHQ DSSOLFDWLRQ FDQ UHVXOW LQ DQ\WKLQJ IURP LQHIÀFLHQW SURFHVV FRQWURO DQG KLJK
maintenance costs through to catastrophic failure in critical applications.
TRANSMISSION
:KLOHWKHUHDUHPDQ\¶ORFDO·PHDVXUHPHQWGHYLFHVIRUH[DPSOHSUHVVXUHJDXJHVDQG
¶ORFDO· FRQWURO HOHPHQWV IRU H[DPSOH KDQGRSHUDWHG YDOYHV LQ HYHU\ SURFHVV SODQW
there are also many measurement and control devices that are required to either send or
UHFHLYHVLJQDOVWRIURPDFHQWUDOLVHGFRQWUROV\VWHP6XFKFRPPXQLFDWLRQVDUHDFKLHYHG
by producing a robust signal at the sending end and conveying it over one of a number
of transmission mediums to the receiving device.
Many modes of transmission have been developed and employed over the years.
$SRSXODUPHGLXPXSWRWKHPLGVZDVSQHXPDWLFXVLQJFRPSUHVVHGDLULQDUDQJH
RI ² SVL SRXQGV SHU VTXDUH LQFK 9DULRXV HOHFWULFDO FXUUHQW DQG YROWDJH VLJQDOV
ZHUH VRPHWLPHV XVHG 7KHVH GD\V PRVW VLJQDOV DUH WUDQVPLWWHG HOHFWULFDOO\ XVLQJ WKH
XQLYHUVDOO\DFFHSWHG²P$WUDQVPLVVLRQVLJQDO$SURFHVVSUHVVXUHLQWKHUDQJHRI
VD\²N3DZRXOGEHFRQYHUWHGLQWRDQHTXLYDOHQW²P$3QHXPDWLFVLJQDOVDUH
VWLOOXVHGLQPDQ\LQVWDQFHVWRDFWXDWHUHJXODWLQJGHYLFHVVXFKDVGLDSKUDJPDFWXDWHG
FRQWUROYDOYHV7KHFRPPDQGVLJQDOLVFRQYH\HGHOHFWULFDOO\WRWKHÀHOGXVLQJ²P$
WUDQVPLVVLRQ$WWKHGLDSKUDJPDFWXDWRUWKHVLJQDOZLOOEHFRQYHUWHGE\DQ,3FXUUHQW
WRSQHXPDWLFFRQYHUWHUWRDSQHXPDWLFVLJQDOLQWKHUDQJHRI²N3D
As has been noted, compressed air is used in many instances to provide the actuating
SRZHUIRUUHJXODWLQJGHYLFHVVXFKDVDXWRPDWLFFRQWUROYDOYHVDQGSRVLWLRQLQJDFWXDWRUV
7KHVH GHYLFHV UHTXLUH GU\ FOHDQ DLU WR ZRUN HIÀFLHQWO\ &RPSUHVVHG DLU SURGXFHG
IRUJHQHUDOSODQWXVHLVQRWVXLWDEOHIRUXVHZLWKLQVWUXPHQWDWLRQHTXLSPHQW*HQHUDO
SODQWFRPSUHVVHGDLUPXVWEHIXUWKHUÀOWHUHGDQGGULHGEHIRUHXVHIRULQVWUXPHQWDWLRQ
SXUSRVHVDQGWKHQRUPDOSUDFWLFHLVIRUDVHSDUDWHÀOWHUGU\HUXQLWWREHLQVWDOOHGDQG
air to be reticulated via a dedicated instrument air ring main. Instrument air systems
QHHGWREHFDUHIXOO\GHVLJQHGIRUH[DPSOHKDYLQJWKHDSSURSULDWHÀOWHUVDQGGU\LQJ
HOHPHQWVIRUWKHDPELHQWFOLPDWHLQVWDOOHGVXFKDVOLQHVEHLQJVORSHGWRZDWHUWUDSV
DQGFRPPLVVLRQHGWKRURXJKFOHDQLQJEHIRUHFRQQHFWLRQWRLQVWUXPHQWDWLRQWRSURYLGH
ORQJWHUPUHOLDEOHVHUYLFH
7KH GHYHORSPHQW RI GLJLWDO QHWZRUNV LV VHHLQJ UDSLG FKDQJHV LQ WKH PRGHV RI
GDWD WUDQVPLVVLRQ 0DQ\ FKDQQHOV RI LQIRUPDWLRQ FDQ QRZ EH TXLFNO\ DQG FKHDSO\
WUDQVPLWWHG DFURVV D VLQJOH FRQGXFWRU WKXV VLJQLÀFDQWO\ UHGXFLQJ WKH EXON DQG FRVW
RI ÀHOG ZLULQJ 7KH DSSDUHQW EHQHÀWV RI VXFK V\VWHPV ZLOO QRW EH UHDOLVHG LQ DOO
applications and the need for a higher level of trade skills to install, maintain and
IDXOWÀQGPHDQVWKDWWKH\VKRXOGEHFRQVLGHUHGRQDFDVHE\FDVHEDVLV7KHSURFHVV
DQGLQVWUXPHQWDWLRQGLDJUDP3 ,'XVHVGLIIHUHQWOLQHVW\OHVWRGLIIHUHQWLDWHVLJQDO
WUDQVPLVVLRQ W\SHV 7KHVH VW\OHV KDYH LQWHUQDWLRQDO VWDQGDUGV IRU DXWRPDWLRQ ,6$
applied to them.
One group represented the process industries that relied heavily on regulatory
RU DQDORJXH FRQWURO 6RPH RI WKHVH LQGXVWULHV LQFOXGH WKH SHWURFKHPLFDO JHQHUDO
FKHPLFDOSXOSDQGSDSHUSRZHUDQGVWHDPUDLVLQJLQGXVWULHV$OORIWKHVHUHTXLUHG
WKH PRGXODWLQJ RI YDULDEOHV WR ÀQLWH YDOXHV DQG FRQWLQXRXV RSHUDWLRQ $QDORJXH
IXQFWLRQV SUHYLRXVO\ FDUULHG RXW LQ SDQHOPRXQWHG HTXLSPHQW ZHUH UHÁHFWHG LQ WKH
ORJLFRIWKHQHZPLFURSURFHVVRUGHYLFHVDQGWKHGHYHORSPHQWZDVLQÁXHQFHGJUHDWO\
E\ WKH LQSXW IURP SURFHVV FRQWURO SHRSOH 7KXV WKH '&6 HYROYHG %HLQJ EDVLFDOO\
D GLJLWDO GHYLFH LW ZDV HDV\ WR LQFRUSRUDWH VHTXHQWLDO ORJLF DQG WHFKQLTXHV VXFK DV
PRWRU FRQWURO KRZHYHU LWV SULQFLSDO SXUSRVH ZDV SURFHVVLQJ DQDORJXH VLJQDOV DQG
providing modulating control.
The second group evolved from the electrical engineering task of automated plant
FRQWURO ZKHUH WKH UHTXLUHPHQW ZDV SULPDULO\ WR VZLWFK LQGXVWULDO FRPSRQHQWV RQ RU
RII DQG LQWHUORFN WKH FRQWURO DFFRUGLQJO\ 7KH SURJUDPPDEOH ORJLF FRQWUROOHU 3/&
ZDVGHYHORSHGWRXVHWKHVSHHGDQGUHOLDELOLW\RIWKHPLFURSURFHVVRUWRUHSODFHUHOD\V
WLPHUVDQGLQWHUFRQQHFWLQJZLULQJ7KHVHTXHQWLDOFRQWUROIHDWXUHVZHUHGHYHORSHGDQG
UHÀQHGWRDKLJKGHJUHHDQGWKH3/&EHFDPHDSRZHUIXODQGUHOLDEOHUHSODFHPHQWIRU
HOHFWULFDOKDUGZDUH6RPHDQDORJXHSURFHVVLQJDELOLW\ZDVGHVLJQHGLQWRWKHHDUOLHU3/&
GHYLFHVEXWWKHUDQJHRIIXQFWLRQVZDVOLPLWHGDQGUHJXODWRU\WHFKQLTXHVZHUHGLIÀFXOW
to implement.
2YHUUHFHQW\HDUVWKH3/&KDVGHYHORSHGUDSLGO\LQSRZHUYHUVDWLOLW\DQGUHOLDELOLW\
7KH FRVW SHU XQLW RI DQDORJXH LQSXWRXWSXW ,2 KDV UHGXFHG VLJQLÀFDQWO\ DQG WKH
UHJXODWRU\ FRQWURO FDSDELOLW\ DQG HDVH RI FRQÀJXUDWLRQ KDV LPSURYHG GUDVWLFDOO\
The operator interface devices these days are mostly standard personal computers
ZLWKDSSURSULDWHVXSHUYLVRU\FRQWURODQGGDWDDFTXLVLWLRQ6&$'$VRIWZDUHLQVWDOOHG
7KHDELOLW\WRLQWHJUDWHWKHVHTXHQWLDODQGUHJXODWRU\FRQWUROORJLFKDVVHHQWKH3/&JDLQ
VLJQLÀFDQWDFFHSWDQFHIRUPDQ\VPDOOWRPHGLXPVL]HGSODQWVQHHGLQJERWKVHTXHQWLDO
and regulatory control.
)RUVPDOOHUDSSOLFDWLRQVVRIWZDUHLVDYDLODEOHWKDWDOORZVFRQWURORIDVLPLODUFDSDELOLW\
WR WKH 3/& WR EH LQFRUSRUDWHG LQWR WKH VWDQGDUG SHUVRQDO FRPSXWHU ZLWK D QHWZRUN
connection to a related I/O device.
Things to remember
x /RRNDWWKHSURFHVVDVDZKROHZKHQDVVHVVLQJWKHFRQWUROUHTXLUHPHQWV&RQVLGHU
WKDWWKHSODQWPXVWRXWSXWDSURGXFWGHULYHGIURPUDZPDWHULDOSUHVHQWHGDWWKHLQSXW
and recognise the control as an overall system rather than a collection of individual
SURSRUWLRQDOLQWHJUDOGHULYDWLYH3,'ORRSV
x )RFXVRQLGHQWLI\LQJWKHFULWLFDOSURFHVVSDUDPHWHUVWKDWUHTXLUHPHDVXUHPHQWDQG
control.
x 2SHUDWH \RXU SODQW ZLWK WKH EDVLF FRQWUROV LQ SODFH IRU D SHULRG RI WLPH DIWHU
FRPPLVVLRQLQJ,URQRXWEDVLFRSHUDWLQJLVVXHVDQGWKHQZKHQWKHSODQWKDVVHWWOHG
GRZQUHYLVLWWKHFRQWUROV\VWHPFRQÀJXUDWLRQDQGWXQLQJDQGFRQVLGHUWKHQHHGIRU
KLJKHUOHYHOFRQWURO
x The advanced regulatory control or advanced control systems may be included in
WKHXSIURQWGHVLJQ7KLVHQVXUHVWKDWWKHUHJXODWRU\FRQWUROOD\HUZLOOLQWHUIDFHZHOO
ZLWKWKHDGYDQFHGSURFHVVFRQWURO$3&OD\HU<RXUSULPDU\SODQWFRQWUROV\VWHP
'&6 RU 3/& ZLOO FRPH ZLWK WKH IDFLOLWLHV DQG FDSDELOLWLHV WR IXOÀO YLUWXDOO\ DOO RI
\RXU FRQWURO UHTXLUHPHQWV 'R QRW FRPPLW WR DGGLQJ ¶VPDUW· RU ¶H[SHUW· FRQWURO
packages to your plant unless you have exhausted the capability of your installed
FRQWUROV\VWHP<RXKDYHSDLGIRUWKHLQVWDOOHGV\VWHPZLWKZKLFK\RXURSHUDWRUV
DQG PDLQWHQDQFH SHRSOH DUH IDPLOLDU DYRLG LQWURGXFLQJ DQRWKHU V\VWHP ZLWKRXW
exhausting the possibilities of the incumbent system.
x <RXUSODQWFRQWUROV\VWHPLVWKHVLQJOHPRVWLPSRUWDQWWRRO\RXKDYHWRJHWWKHEHVW
out of your plant. Take the time and trouble to understand it.
x Process measurement techniques do not focus on ultimate accuracy. Good accuracy
is important but repeatability is essential. Repeatable measurements provide the
FRQWUROV\VWHPZLWKWKHLQIRUPDWLRQIRUDVWDEOHRSHUDWLRQ6WDELOLW\LVNH\WR\RXU
operation.
x 'UDZ XSRQ WKH H[SHULHQFH RI WKH RSHUDWRUV 7KH\ DUH RIWHQ D JRRG VRXUFH RI
NQRZOHGJH RI WKH SODQW·V LQWULFDFLHV DQG WKHLU PDQXDO RSHUDWLQJ WHFKQLTXHV FDQ
inform selecting an appropriate control strategy.
ToFlotation
FromMine
Cyclones
Loader (onlyoneshown)
(Scats) PT
Coarse Loader
Ore Stockpile (COS)
(COS) *
FC SAGMill DT
COSFeed (variablespeed)
FT Trommel MF
Hopper Feed
ApronFeeder Water Screens JT
(variableSpeed) FT
ControlValve
FeedConveyor
WT2 BallMill
FeedChute
JT
WC
WT1
LT LC *
AT
*
/ŶƐƚƌƵŵĞŶƚƐĂŶĚŽŶƚƌŽůůĞƌƐ *
PT Ͳ Cyclonefeedpressure(kPa)
DT Ͳ Cyclonefeeddensity(%solids) FC CycloneFeed
FT Ͳ Volumetricflow(m3/h) CycloneFeed Pump(variableSpeed)
MF Ͳ Solidsflowcalculation(t/h) Hopper FT Hopper
LT Ͳ Hopperlevel(%) Water
LC Ͳ Hopperlevelcontroller ControlValve
FC Ͳ Waterflowcontroller
JT Ͳ SAG/BallMillpower(kW)
WT1 Ͳ SAGload/weight(tonnes)
AT Ͳ SAGnoiselevel(dB)
WT2 Ͳ SAGfeedrate(t/h)
WC Ͳ SAGfeedratecontroller
* Ͳ Operatorsetpoint
FIG 14.2 – Instruments and controllers installed on a circuit containing a semi-autogenous grinding (SAG) mill and a ball mill.
point that is the desired feed rate. If the feed rate is above the set point the feed rate
FRQWUROOHUUHGXFHVWKHVSHHGRIWKHDSURQIHHGHUDQGLIWKHIHHGUDWHLVEHORZWKHVHW
point the apron feeder speed is increased. The signal from the controller sent to the
DSURQ IHHG UDWH FRQWUROOHU LV FDOOHG WKH PDQLSXODWHG YDULDEOH ,QIRUPDWLRQ IURP ÀHOG
LQVWUXPHQWV DQG WR DFWXDWRUV FDQ EH WUDQVPLWWHG E\ ² P$ VLJQDOV RU GLJLWDOO\ YLD
VSHFLDOLVHGGLJLWDOQHWZRUNV
7KLV FRQWURO ORRS DOVR FRXQWHUDFWV GLVWXUEDQFHV WR WKH PLOO IHHG UDWH ,I WKHUH ZHUH
QRGLVWXUEDQFHVWKHFRQWUROOHUZRXOGVLPSO\DGMXVWWKHDSURQIHHGHUVSHHGXQWLOWKH
IHHG UDWH ZDV HTXDO WR WKH VHW SRLQW DQG QR IXUWKHU DGMXVWPHQWV ZRXOG EH UHTXLUHG
KRZHYHUWKHUHDUHGLVWXUEDQFHVWKDWDIIHFWWKHFRQWURORIHYHQWKLVUHODWLYHO\VLPSOH
SURFHVV7KH\DUH
x VKRUWWHUP ² VHFonGV to PLnXtHV ² ZKLFK LQFOXGH YDULDWLRQV LQ EXON GHQVLW\ DQG
particle size
x longer term ²KoXUVtoZHHNV²ZKLFKLQFOXGHZHDUDQGRUHW\SHFKDQJHV
The feed rate controller is required to counteract all these disturbances and keep the
feed rate as close as possible to the set point.
DQRWKHUH[DPSOHRIDEDVLFUHJXODWRU\FRQWUROOHU,IWKHZDWHUÁRZUDWHLVDERYHWKHVHW
SRLQWWKHFRQWUROOHUFORVHVWKHFRQWUROYDOYHDQGLILWLVEHORZWKHVHWSRLQWWKHFRQWUROOHU
opens the control valve.
:KLOHWKHZDWHUÁRZUDWHFRQWUROORRSLVVLPSOHLWLVVWLOOVXEMHFWWRGLVWXUEDQFHVWKH
PRVWFRPPRQRIZKLFKLVFDXVHGE\FKDQJLQJOLQHSUHVVXUHGXHWRRWKHUSODQWVHFWLRQV
UHTXLULQJPRUHRUOHVVZDWHU7KHRUHIHHGUDWHDQGZDWHUÁRZUDWHFRQWUROORRSVPXVW
EH OLQNHG WRJHWKHU WR HQVXUH WKDW WKH GHQVLW\ SHU FHQW VROLGV E\ ZHLJKW HQWHULQJ WKH
6$*PLOOUHPDLQVFRQVWDQW6LQFHGHQVLW\RIWKHPLOOIHHGFDQQRWEHGLUHFWO\PHDVXUHGLW
PXVWEHLQIHUUHGIURPH[LVWLQJPHDVXUHPHQWV8VLQJWKLVDSSURDFKWKHDPRXQWRIZDWHU
UHTXLUHGWRDFKLHYHDWDUJHWIHHGGHQVLW\FDQEHFDOFXODWHGXVLQJWKHIROORZLQJHTXDWLRQV
ZKHUH
)Z LVWKHUHTXLUHGIHHGZDWHUÁRZUDWHPKWRDFKLHYHDWDUJHWGHQVLW\ 't
Wd LVWKHIHHGUDWHRIGU\VROLGVJRLQJWRWKH6$*PLOOWK
Wt LVWKHWRWDOIHHGUDWHRIVROLGVSOXVZDWHUPHDVXUHGE\WKHZHLJKWRPHWHUWK
)m LVWKHDVVXPHGIHHGPRLVWXUHSHUFHQWZDWHUE\ZHLJKW
' f LVWKHFDOFXODWHGIHHGGHQVLW\SHUFHQWVROLGVE\ZHLJKW
't LVWKHWDUJHWRUUHTXLUHGIHHGGHQVLW\SHUFHQWVROLGVE\ZHLJKW
7R LPSOHPHQW (TXDWLRQ LQ D FRQWURO V\VWHP D FDOFXODWLRQ EORFN LV XVHG 7KLV
EORFNXVHVWKHPHDVXUHG6$*IHHGUDWHWKHDVVXPHGIHHGPRLVWXUHDQGWKHWDUJHWIHHG
GHQVLW\WRFDOFXODWHWKHUHTXLUHGIHHGZDWHUÁRZUDWH1RUPDOO\FDOFXODWLRQEORFNVDUH
SURJUDPPHGXVLQJDVLPSOLÀHGFRPSXWHUODQJXDJHZLWKD%$6,&OLNHV\QWD[7KHOLQHV
of computer code in these calculation blocks are often limited in number and complexity,
ZKLFK LV GRQH GHOLEHUDWHO\ WR DYRLG RYHUORDGLQJ WKH V\VWHP &DOFXODWLRQ EORFNV DUH
LQWHQGHGIRUVPDOOVLPSOHFDOFXODWLRQVVXFKDV(TXDWLRQ
)LJXUH DOVR VKRZV WKH FRQWURO VWUDWHJ\ IRU WKH 6$* PLOO WKDW FRPSULVHV WKH
IROORZLQJFRQWUROORRSVDQGFDOFXODWLRQV
x 6$*PLOOIHHGUDWHFRQWUROORRS
x 6$*PLOOIHHGZDWHUFRQWUROORRS
x IHHGZDWHUFDOFXODWLRQEORFNZKLFKOLQNVWKHPHDVXUHGIHHGUDWHWRWKHIHHGZDWHU
ÁRZUDWHVHWSRLQW
This simple example indicates the type of regulatory control used in comminution
FLUFXLWV ,Q D W\SLFDO ZHW JULQGLQJ SURFHVV WKHUH DUH PDQ\ VXFK FRQWURO VWUDWHJLHV
SHUIRUPLQJERWKVLPSOHDQGPRUHFRPSOH[FRQWUROIXQFWLRQVZKLFKFDQEHFRQWUROORRSV
and calculations.
Logic-based control
$QRWKHU LPSRUWDQW FRQWURO V\VWHP IXQFWLRQ LV ORJLFEDVHG FRQWURO VXFK DV VHTXHQFHV
DQG LQWHUORFNV ZKLFK LV XVHG WR VWRSVWDUW SODQWV IRU H[DPSOH D JULQGLQJ FLUFXLW
VWRSVWDUWLQGLYLGXDOXQLWVRIHTXLSPHQWDSXPSRUSURWHFWHTXLSPHQWIURPGDPDJH
VWRSDSXPSLIKRW/RJLFFRQWUROLVLPSOHPHQWHGLQWKHSODQWFRQWUROV\VWHPWRJHWKHU
ZLWK²EXWDWDORZHUOHYHOWKDQ²FRQWUROORRSVDQGFDOFXODWLRQV
FIG 14.3 – The relationships between feed rate, power and load in a semi-autogenous
grinding mill (image courtesy Jeff McKay; adapted from Williamson, 1960).
CONTROL OF A CRUSHER
The feed rate to the primary grinding circuit is the critical variable in a concentrator
since it determines the economics of the entire mineral processing enterprise.
3ULPDU\ JULQGLQJ LV SUHFHGHG E\ FUXVKLQJ VR FUXVKHU FRQWURO LV UHIHUUHG WR EULHÁ\
7KHUHJXODWRU\FRQWURORIDFUXVKHULQYROYHV
x maintaining feed rate at the desired set point
x starting and stopping the crusher
x protecting the crusher from metal or other damage
x choke feeding the crusher.
$FRQHFUXVKHUPD\EHOLPLWHGE\WKHYROXPHRIIHHGFRPLQJWRLWERZOOHYHOWKH
KDUGQHVVRIWKHRUHSRZHUGUDZRUWKHSK\VLFDOOLPLWDWLRQVRIWKHFUXVKHUK\GUDXOLF
SUHVVXUH RU PRWRU DPSV &UXVKHU ORJLF PXVW WKHQ GHWHUPLQH ZKHQ WR LQFUHDVH RU
GHFUHDVHIHHGUDWHEDVHGRQ
x ERZOOHYHO
x SRZHUGUDZ
x K\GUDXOLFSUHVVXUHLIWKHFUXVKHULVDK\GURVHWFUXVKHUDQGWLJKWHQRUORRVHQWKHJDS
RIWKHFUXVKHUGHSHQGLQJXSRQWKHGHVLUHGSURGXFWVL]HDQGKRZKDUGWKHFUXVKHU
LVZRUNLQJ
$GMXVWPHQWRIWKHJDSVHWWLQJZRXOGWKHUHIRUHLQYROYHORRNLQJDWFUXVKHUDPSVDQG
the rock size distribution generated by the crusher.
7KXVWKHUHLVDJDLQDQRQOLQHDUFRQWUROZLWKPXOWLSOHLQSXWVDQGPXOWLSOHRXWSXWV
x 5HJXODtoU\FontUoO²DVRXQGNQRZOHGJHRIERWKEDVLFDQGDGYDQFHGUHJXODWRU\FRQWURO
WHFKQLTXHVLVUHTXLUHGWRGHVLJQDQGLPSOHPHQWFRQWUROVWUDWHJLHV6SLW]HUOLVWV
regulatory control techniques and explains them in more detail.
x &DSDELOLt\ oI tKH SODnt FontUoO V\VtHP 3&6 ² WKH 3&6 LV WKH WRRO XVHG WR LPSOHPHQW
control strategies. These systems provide more than just regulatory control; they also
SURYLGHDJUDSKLFDOLQWHUIDFHIRUWKHRSHUDWRUDQGWKHDELOLW\WRLPSOHPHQWORJLFEDVHG
FRQWURO([SHULHQFHGSURFHVVFRQWUROPHWDOOXUJLVWVPXVWKDYHDWKRURXJKNQRZOHGJH
RIWKHFDSDELOLW\RIWKHLU3&6SDUWLFXODUO\WKHUHJXODWRU\FRQWUROFDSDELOLW\
1. The most widely used expert systems in mineral processing include Gensym’s G2© software, KnowledgeScape’s
KSX© product and Metso’s OCS© and OCS-4D© software tools. All of these have been utilised for many years,
decades even, and have solid track records at plants around the world. Most DCS vendors also have some APC
tools embedded in or offered with their control systems, but these may be limited in scope or accessibility to
process personnel.
LQFUHDVHG SURGXFWLRQ RI VDOHDEOH SURGXFW ZLWK UHGXFHG FRQVXPSWLRQ RI SODQW
FRQVXPDEOHVVXFKDVUHDJHQWVDQGEDOOFKDUJHDQGRULQFUHDVHGSURGXFWTXDOLW\
([SHUWV\VWHPVDUHUXOHEDVHGDSSOLFDWLRQVHPSOR\LQJ¶LI«WKHQ«·ORJLFWRSHUIRUP
anything from simple to complex actions. While virtually all expert systems utilise an
¶LI«WKHQ«·VWUXFWXUHWKHH[DFWV\QWD[IRUFRQVWUXFWLQJFRQWUROORJLFGHSHQGVXSRQ
WKHVSHFLÀFWRROHPSOR\HG([SHUWV\VWHPVW\SLFDOO\IXQFWLRQRQDPDFURVHFRQGWLPH
VFDOHPRUHWKDQRQHVHFRQGVFDQWLPHVDQGDUHWKXVEHVWVXLWHGIRUDFWLRQVW\SLFDOO\
WDNHQE\RSHUDWRUVUDWKHUWKDQUHSODFLQJ3,'RUUHJXODWRU\FRQWUROORRSV%HFDXVHRIWKH
UHODWLYHO\VLPSOHSURJUDPPLQJODQJXDJHLI«WKHQ«H[SHUWV\VWHPVFDQEHTXLFNO\
learnt and utilised by process engineers and process control personnel.
([SHUW V\VWHPV SURYLGH D WRRO WKDW QRW RQO\ DLGV LQ SURJUDPPLQJ FRPSOH[ PXOWL
LQSXWPXOWLRXWSXWVWUDWHJLHVEXWDOVRSURPRWHVWKHORQJHYLW\DQGVXUYLYDELOLW\RIWKH
system after its development. This is due to plant personnel being able to understand
DQG PRGLI\ WKH H[LVWLQJ ORJLF ZLWK PLQLPDO WUDLQLQJ $QRWKHU VWURQJ DGYDQWDJH RI
expert systems is their inherent ability to explain their actions. As they use a humanistic
DSSURDFKWRGHFLVLRQPDNLQJLILVWUXHWKHQGRWKHIROORZLQJWKHH[HFXWLRQRIWKHLU
ORJLFVKRZVH[DFWO\KRZWKHDSSOLFDWLRQUHDFKHGDGHFLVLRQ6RPHH[SHUWV\VWHPVHYHQ
VDYHWKLVORJLFVRWKDWWKHXVHUFDQJREDFNLQWLPHDQGVHHMXVWZKDWKDSSHQHGDQGZK\
at any given moment in the recent past. This feature is particularly useful as it is rare for
VRPHRQHWREHPRQLWRULQJWKHFRQWUROORJLFZKHQLQWHUHVWLQJHYHQWVRFFXU
Logic types
7KHW\SHRIORJLFXWLOLVHGE\PRVWH[SHUWV\VWHPVPD\EHFDWHJRULVHGDV¶FULVS·RU¶IX]]\·
ORJLF 7KH PRVW ZLGHO\ XVHG H[SHUW V\VWHPV HPSOR\ D FRPELQDWLRQ RI ERWK FULVS DQG
fuzzy logic.
&ULVSORJLFDVWKHQDPHLPSOLHVLVORJLFZKHUHWKHSUHPLVHLISDUWRIDUXOHLVHLWKHU
SHU FHQW WUXH RU SHU FHQW IDOVH RU 7KLV UHVXOWV LQ GLVWLQFW EODFN RU ZKLWH
DFWLRQV$QH[DPSOHRIFULVSORJLFLV
,I6$*SRZHU!6$*SRZHUKLJKOLPLWDQG6$*SRZHUUDWHRIFKDQJH!
7KHQ6$*IHHGUDWHVHWSRLQW63FKDQJH WK
,Q IX]]\ ORJLF WKH SUHPLVH RI D UXOH FDQ KDYH D GHJUHH RI WUXWK EHWZHHQ ]HUR DQG
SHUFHQWDQGWKLVGHJUHHRIWUXWKIXOQHVVLVXVHGWRZHLJKWWKHFRQFOXVLRQFRPSDUHG
WR FRQFOXVLRQV IURP RWKHU UXOHV )X]]\ ORJLF DOORZV WKH SURJUDPPHU WR H[SUHVV WKH
control strategy in easily understood and agreed upon terminology and therefore is
PXFKHDVLHUWRXQGHUVWDQGZKHQUHDGLQJWKHFRQWUROORJLF)RUH[DPSOHDIX]]\UXOH
PLJKWVWDWHWKHIROORZLQJ
,I6$*SRZHULVKLJKDQG6$*SRZHUUDWHRIFKDQJHLVQRWGHFUHDVLQJ
7KHQWKHIHHGUDWH63FKDQJHLVDODUJHGHFUHDVH
7KH GLIIHUHQFH EHWZHHQ WKH WZR UXOHV LV WKDW WKH FKDQJH DSSOLHG LQ WKH VHFRQG UXOH
PD\YDU\IURPDVPDOODPRXQWWRDODUJHDPRXQWGHSHQGLQJRQWKHGHJUHHWRZKLFKWKH
SUHPLVHLVWUXH6$*SRZHULVKLJKDQGQRWGHFUHDVLQJ,QWKHÀUVWUXOHDWKIHHG
UDWHFXWZLOORFFXUQRPDWWHULIWKHSRZHUDQGLWVUDWHRIFKDQJHLVEDUHO\RYHUWKHOLPLWV
KLJKOLPLWDQGUDWHRIFKDQJHRI]HURRUIDULQH[FHVVRIWKHOLPLWV
7KHÁRZRIORJLFLQDQH[SHUWV\VWHPLVW\SLFDOO\DUHVXOWRIHLWKHUFRQFOXVLRQVIURP
RQHUXOHEHLQJXVHGLQWKHSUHPLVHRIDQRWKHUUXOHRULQJUDSKLFDOFRQQHFWLRQVEHWZHHQ
blocks of logic.
Model-based control
Process models can be used as soft sensors to provide the necessary estimation for a
FRQWUROOHGYDULDEOHWKDWLVQRWDFWXDOO\PHDVXUHGLQWKHÀHOGVHHVHFWLRQRQ¶6RIWVHQVRU
LQ2&6·LQ&KDSWHU0RGHOVFDQDOVREHLQYROYHGLQSURFHVVFRQWUROLQDPXFKVLPSOHU
RUPRUHFRPSOH[ZD\
On the simpler side, regulatory control and advanced regulatory control make use
RIPRGHOVIRUDQXPEHURIWHFKQLTXHV,QIHHGIRUZDUGFRQWUROIRULQVWDQFHDQLQYHUVH
DQGRIWHQVLPSOLÀHGPRGHORIWKHSURFHVVFDQEHXVHGWRFDOFXODWHVRPHSDUWRIWKH
FRQWURODFWLRQOHDYLQJWKHWULPPLQJWRWKHIHHGEDFNFRQWUROOHU'HDGWLPHFRPSHQVDWLRQ
DOVRPDNHVXVHRIDVLPSOLÀHGSURFHVVPRGHOWRSUHGLFWDFRQWUROOHGYDULDEOHDQGKHOS
VWDELOLVH FORVHGORRS V\VWHPV ZLWK SXUH GHOD\V EHWZHHQ WKH DFWLRQ DQG WKH PHDVXUH
RILWVHIIHFWV7KLVLVIRUH[DPSOHWKHFDVHRIPDWHULDOÁRZFRQWURORQEHOWFRQYH\RUV
ZKHUHWKHUHLVDSXUHWUDQVSRUWGHOD\EHWZHHQWKHDFWXDWRUVIHHGHUVDQGWKHVHQVRU
EHOWVFDOH'HDGWLPHFRPSHQVDWLRQLVDSDUWLFXODUFDVHRIWKHPRUHJHQHUDOLQWHUQDO
PRGHOFRQWUROWHFKQLTXHIRUZKLFKWKHFRQWUROOHUHPEHGVDPRGHORIWKHV\VWHP
,QDGYDQFHGSURFHVVFRQWUROWKHSUHGLFWLYHFDSDELOLW\RIPRGHOVLVPDLQO\XVHGLQWZR
FRQWUROWHFKQLTXHV
PRGHOEDVHGRSWLPLVLQJFRQWURO
2. model predictive control.
7\SLFDO PRGHOEDVHG RSWLPLVLQJ FRQWURO DSSOLFDWLRQV ZLOO PDNH XVH RI D PRGHO DQG
RSWLPLVDWLRQDOJRULWKPWRÀQGWKHEHVWVHWRIPDQLSXODWHGYDULDEOHYDOXHVWRPD[LPLVH
DQHFRQRPLFIXQFWLRQXQGHUDVHWRIFRQVWUDLQWV)RUD6$*PLOOWKLVZRXOGWUDQVODWHLQWR
ÀQGLQJ WKH EHVW IHHG UDWH IHHG GHQVLW\ DQG PLOO VSHHG WR PD[LPLVH WKURXJKSXW ZKLOH
NHHSLQJSURGXFWVL]HSHEEOHVSURGXFWLRQSRZHUGUDZDQGPLOOORDGLQUHDVRQDEOHUDQJHV
Model predictive controllers have found good success in chemical and petrochemical
industries, but their application in minerals processing has been less pervasive.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Dunn,:& )XnGDPHntDOV oI ,nGXVtULDO ,nVtUXPHntDtLon DnG 3UoFHVV &ontUoOS0F*UDZ
+LOO%RRN&RPSDQ\1HZ<RUN
McMillan, * . 7XnLnJ DnG &ontUoO /ooS 3HUIoUPDnFH $ 3UDFtLtLonHU·V *XLGH, third edition,
$SSHQGL[.S,QWHUQDWLRQDO6RFLHW\RI$XWRPDWLRQ1RUWK&DUROLQD
Spitzer,':$GYDnFHG 5HJXODtoU\ &ontUoO $SSOLFDtLonV DnG 7HFKnLTXHVS0RPHQWXP
3UHVV1HZ<RUN
Williamson,-(7KHDXWRPDWLFFRQWURORIJULQGLQJPHGLDLQSHEEOHPLOOV-oXUnDO oI tKH 6oXtK
$IULFDn ,nVtLtXtH oI 0LnLnJ DnG 0HtDOOXUJ\²
Chapter 15
CASE STUDIES OF
CONTROL SYSTEMS
Dirk Baas, Duncan Bennett and Peter Walker1
Alain Broussaud, Geoffrey Legrand, Deon Kok,
Etienne Roux, Olivier Guyot and Marc Revalor2
INTRODUCTION
(YHU\ FRPPLQXWLRQ FLUFXLW FDQ EHQHÀW IURP HIIHFWLYH SURFHVV FRQWURO 7KH FRQWURO
V\VWHPVDW3KX.KDPDQG$KDIRGLVFXVVHGLQWKLVFKDSWHUDUHFRQFHUQHGZLWKORZ
JUDGHJROGRUHDQGORZJUDGHFRSSHURUHFLUFXLWVZKLFKPXVWKDYHKLJKWKURXJKSXWV
WR JHQHUDWH VXIÀFLHQW UHYHQXH LI PLQLQJ RSHUDWLRQV DUH WR EH YLDEOH 7KH FRQWURO RI
FRPPLQXWLRQFLUFXLWVIRUFRDOLQSRZHUVWDWLRQVZKLFKPXVWEHJURXQGÀQHHQRXJKWR
EXUQUDSLGO\LQWKHIXUQDFHDQGFHPHQWFOLQNHUZKLFKPXVWEHJURXQGÀQHHQRXJK
WRPDNHFRQFUHWHWKDWPHHWVVWDWXWRU\VWUHQJWKUHTXLUHPHQWVDUHGLVFXVVHGEULHÁ\LQ
&KDSWHU
&RPPLQXWLRQFLUFXLWVIRUORZJUDGHFRSSHUDQGJROGRUHVXVXDOO\FRQWDLQERWKVHPL
DXWRJHQRXVJULQGLQJ6$*PLOOVDQGEDOOPLOOVDQGRIWHQSURFHVVRUHVIURPGLIIHUHQW
GHSRVLWV 7KH FRPPLQXWLRQ UDWHV RI SDUWLFOHV LQ 6$* PLOOV GHSHQG RQ WKH RUH LQ WKH
PLOODQGFKDQJHLQRUHW\SHLQHYLWDEO\FKDQJHVWKHKDUGQHVVDQGIHHGVL]HRIWKHRUH
1. Phu Kham case study: this case study was originally published as: Baas, D, Bennett, D and Walker, P, 2014.
Developing process control standards for optimal plant performance at PanAust Limited, in Proceedings 12th
AusIMM Mill Operators’ Conference, pp 325–334 (The Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy: Melbourne).
2. Ahafo case study: this case study is a modified version of a paper originally published as: Broussaud, A, Legrand, G,
Kok, D, Roux, E, Guyot, O and Revalor, M, 2011. Integrated advanced grinding control system at Newmont Ahafo,
in Proceedings SAG Conference 2011. It is reproduced here with the kind permission of the Canadian Institute of
Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum.
7KH WKHPH RI WKH $KDIR FDVH VWXG\ LV PLQLPLVLQJ WKH HIIHFW RI YDULDWLRQV LQ WKH
SURSHUWLHV RIRUHW\SHVZKLOHWKHFDVHVWXG\DW3KX.KDPOLQNVFRPPLQXWLRQFLUFXLW
FRQWUROZLWKWKHFRQWURORIWKHHQWLUHPLQLQJDQGSURFHVVLQJRSHUDWLRQ
3URFHVVFRQWUROLVDUDSLGO\PRYLQJWHFKQRORJ\EHFDXVHQHZPDWKHPDWLFDOWHFKQLTXHV
DUH EHLQJ GHYHORSHG IRU XVH LQ FRQWURO V\VWHPV QHZ VHQVRUV DUH EHFRPLQJ DYDLODEOH
DQG WKH FDSDFLW\ RI FRPSXWHUV LV LQFUHDVLQJ &RQWURO WHFKQLTXHV EDVHG RQ VHQVRUV
DQG PDWKHPDWLFDO WHFKQLTXHV WKDW KDYH EHHQ DYDLODEOH IRU \HDUV DUH UHIHUUHG WR DV
FRQYHQWLRQDOFRQWUROZKLOHWKRVHWKDWKDYHEHHQGHYHORSHGUHFHQWO\DUHUHIHUUHGWRDV
DGYDQFHGFRQWURO7KHDGYDQFHGFRQWUROV\VWHPDW$KDIRLVGLVFXVVHGDVDQH[DPSOHRI
WKHW\SHRIFRQWUROV\VWHPDSSOLHGWRODUJHVFDOHPLQHUDOSURFHVVLQJRSHUDWLRQV
RSHQSLWPLQHDQGDQ0WDFRQFHQWUDWRU7KHRSHUDWLRQXWLOLVHVFRQYHQWLRQDOVKRYHO
PLQLQJDQGWUXFNKDXODJHWRWKHSURFHVVLQJIDFLOLWLHV
7KH 3KX .KDP FRSSHU²JROG GHSRVLW LV D FRPSOH[ PLQHUDORJLFDO V\VWHP ZLWK
PLQHUDOLVDWLRQSUHVHQWLQLURQULFKVNDUQVVLOLFDULFKVWRFNZRUNDQGDOWHUHGGLVVHPLQDWHG
VW\OHV 7KH GHSRVLW KDV XQGHUJRQH QXPHURXV IDXOWLQJ IROGLQJ DQG DOWHUDWLRQ HYHQWV
FUHDWLQJ VLJQLÀFDQW YDULDELOLW\ LQ PLQHUDORJ\ DQG KDUGQHVV ZLWKLQ RUH EORFNV
7KH JHRORJ\ DQG PLQHUDORJ\ LQFOXGLQJ JDQJXH PLQHUDOV DUH GHVFULEHG LQ PRUH
GHWDLOE\%HQQHWW&UQNRYLFDQG:DONHU
7KH 3KX .KDP FLUFXLW FRQVLVWV RI D SULPDU\ J\UDWRU\ FUXVKHU ð P
ð LQFKHV IHG GLUHFWO\ E\ ' KDXO WUXFNV &UXVKHU GLVFKDUJH UHSRUWV WR D
FUXVKHGRUHVWRFNSLOHZLWKDQDSSUR[LPDWHOLYHFDSDFLW\RI0WYLDDQRYHUODQG
FRQYH\RU5HFODLPHGRUHIURPWKHVWRFNSLOHIHHGVWKH0:PGLDPHWHUðP
HIIHFWLYH JULQGLQJ OHQJWK (*/ IW Ǘ ð IW (*/ 6$* PLOO RSHUDWLQJ LQ FORVHG
FLUFXLWZLWKSHEEOHVUHF\FOHGEDFNWRWKH6$*IHHG1RSHEEOHFUXVKLQJLVLQVWDOOHG
'RZQVWUHDPRIWKH6$*PLOOLVWKHEDOOPLOO²F\FORQHFLUFXLWFRQVLVWLQJRIWZR0:
P GLDPHWHU ð P (*/ IW Ǘ ð IW (*/ EDOO PLOOV RSHUDWLQJ LQ FORVHG
FLUFXLWZLWKWZRFOXVWHUVRIPPGLDPHWHUF\FORQHV
&\FORQHRYHUÁRZVUHSRUWWRWKHÁRWDWLRQFLUFXLWZKLFKFRQVLVWVRIDEDQNRIWHQP
WDQN FHOO URXJKHUV DQG D EDQN RI ÀYH Pó 5RXJKHU WDLOV DUH PL[HG ZLWK WKH FOHDQHU
VWDJH WDLOLQJV DQG IRUP WKH ÀQDO FRPELQHG WDLOLQJV VWUHDP ZKLFK ÁRZV E\ JUDYLW\ LQWR
D VXEDTXHRXV WDLOLQJV VWRUDJH IDFLOLW\ 5RXJKHU FRQFHQWUDWH LV FODVVLÀHG LQ D FOXVWHU RI
PP UHJULQG F\FORQHV ZLWK RYHUÁRZ UHSRUWLQJ WR D -DPHVRQ &HOO XVHG LQ D FOHDQHU
IHHG VFDOSLQJ GXW\ 8QGHUÁRZ LV UHJURXQG LQ WZR RSHQFLUFXLW 0 ,VD0LOO UHJULQG
PLOOV DQG UHMRLQV WKH RYHUÁRZ VWUHDP &RQFHQWUDWH IURP WKH -DPHVRQ &HOO UHSRUWV WR WKH
ÀQDO FRQFHQWUDWH WKLFNHQHU -DPHVRQ &HOO WDLOLQJV IHHG D FRQYHQWLRQDO WKUHHVWDJH FOHDQLQJ
FLUFXLW ZLWK WKH ÀUVW VWDJH LQ RSHQ FLUFXLW &LUFXLW GHWDLOV DQG SURFHVV GHYHORSPHQW
LQIRUPDWLRQ DUH SURYLGHG E\ %HQQHWW &UQNRYLF DQG :DONHU
7KH 3KX .KDP FLUFXLW LV VKRZQ VFKHPDWLFDOO\ LQ )LJXUH
3DQ$XVW KDV UHFRJQLVHG WKH EHQHÀWV RI XVLQJ SURFHVV FRQWURO DFURVV DOO IDFHWV RI LWV
RSHUDWLRQV LQ RUGHU WR PD[LPLVH FDSLWDO HIÀFLHQF\ DQG DVVHW XWLOLVDWLRQ 3URFHVV FRQWURO
VWUDWHJLHV FRQWURO PHWKRG GHYHORSPHQWV DQG VWDQGDUGV IRU SURGXFWLRQ FRQWURO DQG
UHSRUWLQJ DUH DSSOLHG WR H[LVWLQJ VLWHV DQG QHZ SURMHFWV
FIG 15.2 – Phu Kham simplified process flow diagram (image courtesy PanAust Ltd).
3ULRU WR WKH FRQWURO URRP RSHUDWRU ZRXOG EH JLYHQ D VHW RI UHJXODWRU\ ORRS VHW
SRLQWV RU UDQJHV DV D JXLGH WR DFKLHYH WKH SODQW VKLIW REMHFWLYHV RU WDUJHWV 7KH RSHUDWRU
ZRXOG FRQWLQXDOO\ UHHYDOXDWH WKH VHW SRLQWV WR HQVXUH WKH SODQW SHUIRUPDQFH ZDV ZLWKLQ
WKH UHTXLUHG UDQJH DV ZHOO DV PRQLWRU WKH SHUIRUPDQFH RI WKH UHJXODWRU\ ORRSV ,Q HIIHFW
WKH RSHUDWRU ZDV DQ LQWHJUDO SDUW RI WKH SURFHVV FRQWURO V\VWHP ZKLFK OHDGV WR FRQVLGHUDEOH
FRQWURO YDULDELOLW\ ERWK ZLWKLQ DQG DFURVV VKLIWV DV RSHUDWRUV DUH XQDEOH WR PRQLWRU WKH
SURFHVV FRQWLQXDOO\ DQG RSHUDWRU UHVSRQVH WR D JLYHQ VLWXDWLRQ FDQ EH LQFRQVLVWHQW
%\ OLIWLQJ WKH OHYHO RI DXWRPDWHG FRQWURO WKURXJK UHOLDEOH GDWD DFTXLVLWLRQ DQG FRQWURO
RI WKH SURFHVV WKH RSHUDWRU LV UHPRYHG IURP UHJXODWRU\ FRQWURO GHFLVLRQV DQG LV RQO\
UHTXLUHG WR PRQLWRU WKH SHUIRUPDQFH RI WKH DGYDQFHG FRQWUROOHUV (OHYDWLQJ WKH UROH RI
WKH RSHUDWRU UHTXLUHV WKH SURFHVVLQJ SODQW WR EH HIIHFWLYHO\ DQG UHOLDEO\ DXWRPDWHG ZLWK
WKH LQWHUIDFH GHVLJQHG WR LQFUHDVH WKH RSHUDWRU·V VLWXDWLRQDO DZDUHQHVV RI WKH SODQW ZKLOH
QRW EHLQJ ÁRRGHG ZLWK H[FHVVLYH LQIRUPDWLRQ RU ZDUQLQJV
6WDUWLQJ DQ RSHUDWLRQ ZLWK WKH EHVW FRQWURO PHWKRGRORJLHV GHYHORSV D FXOWXUH WKDW
DFFHSWV DXWRPDWLRQ DQG FRQWURO ,QWURGXFLQJ DGYDQFHG FRQWURO PHWKRGV GXULQJ DQ
RSHUDWLRQ·V OLIH F\FOH UHTXLUHV ZLQGRZV RI RSSRUWXQLW\ IRU LPSOHPHQWDWLRQ DQG PXFK
FKDQJH PDQDJHPHQW LQSXW DQG RSHUDWRU WUDLQLQJ WR DYRLG SXVKEDFN LQ DGRSWLQJ WKH QHZ
PHWKRGV $OO RI WKHVH VWHSV LQFUHDVH WKH WLPH WR DFKLHYH FRQWURO EHQHÀWV DQG ZLWKRXW
VLJQLÀFDQW UHVRXUFHV DSSOLHG WR EHGGLQJLQ DGYDQFHG FRQWURO WKH RSHUDWLRQ ZLOO TXLFNO\
UHWXUQ WR LWV IRUPHU VWDWH
7KH ÀUVW SKDVH RI WKH ERWWRPXS SURFHVV ZDV WR HQDEOH VLPSOH VLQJOHORRS FRQWUROOHUV
WR RSHUDWH DV SHU GHVLJQ 7KH SUHPLVH ZDV WKDW UHJXODWRU\ DQG VWDELOLVLQJ DGYDQFHG
FRQWURO FDQ RQO\ EH LPSOHPHQWHG LI WKH LQVWUXPHQWDWLRQ DQG EDVLF FRQWURO LV IXQFWLRQLQJ
HQKDQFHPHQW ZLWK VWDQGDUG WHFKQLTXHV VXFK DV IHHG IRUZDUG UDWLR FRQWURO DQG GHDG
WLPH FRPSHQVDWLRQ EHFDPH SRVVLEOH
7KH VHFRQG SKDVH ZDV WR DSSO\ PHWKRGV RI VWDELOLVLQJ DGYDQFHG FRQWURO WR LPSURYH
WKH SHUIRUPDQFH RI WKH SODQW·V NH\ DUHDV VXFK DV FUXVKLQJ FRQYH\LQJ JULQGLQJ ÁRWDWLRQ
DQG WKLFNHQLQJ ,PSURYHPHQWV LQ DUFKLWHFWXUH DQG GDWD VWRUDJH V\VWHPV ZHUH DOVR
LPSOHPHQWHG DOORZLQJ GHWDLOHG SURFHVV DQDO\VLV WR EH XQGHUWDNHQ RYHU ORQJ WLPH
SHULRGV $SSO\LQJ DGYDQFHG FRQWURO DQG GDWD DQDO\VLV KDV UHGXFHG YDULDELOLW\ LQ SURFHVV
RXWSXWV DQG GLVWXUEDQFH WR LQSXWV WR GRZQVWUHDP XQLWV RI WKH SURFHVV :KHUH FRPPRQ
SURFHVVHV H[LVW EHWZHHQ RSHUDWLQJ VLWHV VXFK DV 6$* PLOOLQJ DGYDQFHG FRQWURO VWUDWHJLHV
KDYH EHHQ XWLOLVHG UHJDUGOHVV RI GLIIHUHQFHV LQ KDUGZDUH DQG VRIWZDUH SODWIRUPV
7KH VXFFHVV RI DSSO\LQJ LPSURYHG DXWRPDWLRQ KDV SURPSWHG 3DQ$XVW WR GHYHORS
SURFHVV FRQWURO VWUDWHJLHV DQG VWDQGDUGV WKDW ZLOO EH XVHG IRU DOO SURMHFWV 7KH VWUDWHJLHV
DUH LQWHQGHG WR EH DSSOLHG DFURVV DOO SURGXFWLRQ DQG SURGXFW ORJLVWLFV DFWLYLWLHV WR
LQWHJUDWH DQG FRQWURO HDFK OLQN LQ WKH EXVLQHVV FKDLQ
System design
(DFK XQLW RI WKH SURFHVV KDV LQSXWV DQG RXWSXWV GHÀQHG LQ PHDVXUDEOH WHUPV VXFK DV
WRQQHV WKURXJKSXW SDUWLFOH VL]H DQG JUDGH ZKLFK GHWHUPLQH WKH OHYHO RI LQVWUXPHQWDWLRQ
UHTXLUHG 7KH XQLW·V VWUDWHJLHV VKRXOG DOVR EH ÁH[LEOH VR DV WR PHHW WKH ÀQDO SURGXFWLRQ
TXDQWLW\ DQG TXDOLW\ WDUJHWV 'XULQJ SURFHVV FRQWURO GHVLJQ WKH SURFHVV REMHFWLYHV DQG
VWUDWHJLHV IRU FRQWURO PXVW EH GHÀQHG 7KH FRQWURO VWUDWHJ\ WKHQ GHWHUPLQHV WKH SK\VLFDO
PHDVXUHPHQWV DQG ORFDWLRQ RI LQVWUXPHQWDWLRQ RQOLQH VDPSOLQJ DVVD\V GDWD FROOHFWLRQ
DQG UHWHQWLRQ UHSRUWLQJ DQG WKH FRQWURO V\VWHP UHTXLUHG 7KH VDPH SURFHVV DSSOLHV WR
DOO IXQFWLRQDO XQLWV RI WKH RSHUDWLRQ 8VLQJ VWDQGDUGV GXULQJ GHVLJQ HQVXUHV WKDW SURYHQ
HTXLSPHQW LV VHOHFWHG DQG LQVWDOOHG FRUUHFWO\ RU WKDW DOORZDQFH LV PDGH IRU HTXLSPHQW
FIG 15.4 – Flexible operating strategies and objectives (image courtesy PanAust Ltd).
WR EH UHWURÀWWHG LI MXVWLÀHG E\ VLWH FRQGLWLRQV 7KH GHWDLOHG UHTXLUHPHQWV HQVXUH WKDW WKH
SURFHVV FRQWURO ZLOO EH DXWRPDWHG DFFRUGLQJ WR WKH GHVLJQ DQG IXQFWLRQLQJ DV VRRQ DV
FRPPLVVLRQLQJ KDV EHHQ FRPSOHWHG
Equipment
7KH GHVLJQ VWDQGDUGV DUH DSSOLHG WR WKUHH EURDG JURXSV RI LQVWUXPHQWDWLRQ DQG
HTXLSPHQW
*URXS $ 0DQGDWRU\ PLQLPXP HTXLSPHQW IRU DOO SURMHFWV UHTXLUHG WR PHHW FRQWURO
VWDQGDUGV
*URXS % 3URFHVVVSHFLÀF HTXLSPHQW WKDW LV PDQGDWRU\ IRU VRPH SURFHVVHV EXW QRW
RWKHUV
*URXS & 1RQPDQGDWRU\ HTXLSPHQW WKDW PD\ EH HFRQRPLFDOO\ MXVWLÀDEOH EDVHG RQ
VLWHVSHFLÀF UHTXLUHPHQWV RU QRW UHTXLUHG GXULQJ HDUO\ \HDUV DQG LQVWDOOHG DW
D ODWHU GDWH
Reliability
$ FRPPRQ IDLOLQJ UHFRJQLVHG GXULQJ FRQWURO VWDQGDUGV GHYHORSPHQW DQG UHFRUGHG
GXULQJ WKH 3KX .KDP DXGLW LV WKDW ÀHOG LQVWUXPHQWDWLRQ IRU SURFHVV FRQWURO LV
RIWHQ QRW FRQVLGHUHG FULWLFDO UHFHLYLQJ D ORZ PDLQWHQDQFH SULRULW\ EHFDXVH LW GRHV QRW
DFWXDOO\ VWRS WKH SURFHVV 7KH UHVXOW RI GHJUDGLQJ ÀHOG LQVWUXPHQWDWLRQ LV LQFUHDVLQJ
RSHUDWRU LQSXW DQG D PRYHPHQW WRZDUG PDQXDO FRQWURO LQFUHDVLQJ SURFHVV YDULDELOLW\
7KH DFFXUDF\ DYDLODELOLW\ DQG FRQVHTXHQFH RI IDLOXUH IRU HDFK PHDVXUHPHQW DQG
LQVWUXPHQW QHFHVVDU\ IRU FRQWURO PXVW EH VSHFLÀHG GXULQJ GHVLJQ DFFRUGLQJ WR WKH
LPSDFW RQ FRQWUROOHG RXWSXWV RI UDWH DQG TXDOLW\ 7KLV ZLOO GHWHUPLQH WKH W\SHV RI
LQVWUXPHQWV LQVWDOOHG ZKHWKHU EXLOWLQ UHGXQGDQF\ LV UHTXLUHG DQG D PDLQWHQDQFH
FULWLFDOLW\ UDWLQJ
5HOLDELOLW\ DQG SHUIRUPDQFH LV DFKLHYHG E\ VHOHFWLQJ ÀWIRUSXUSRVH DQG KLJKTXDOLW\
HTXLSPHQW WKDW LV FRUUHFWO\ LQVWDOOHG FDOLEUDWHG DQG PDLQWDLQHG &RQWURO PRGHOV
DUH GHVLJQHG ZLWK LQVWUXPHQW IDLOXUH FRQVLGHUDWLRQV LQ SODFH ,I DQ LQVWUXPHQW IDLOV
WKH FRQWURO PRGHO VKRXOG DGDSW WR WKH ORVV RI D PHDVXUHPHQW DQG QRW UHVSRQG ZLWK
LQDSSURSULDWH YLJRXU 'LIÀFXOWWRPDLQWDLQ HTXLSPHQW VXFK DV 6$* PLOO ORDG FHOOV FDQ
EH EDFNHG XS ZLWK EHDULQJ RLO SUHVVXUH WUDQVPLWWHUV WR HQVXUH FRQWURO LV PDLQWDLQHG
RWKHUZLVH UHGXQGDQW HTXLSPHQW PD\ EH MXVWLÀHG WR NHHS FULWLFDO FRQWURO IXQFWLRQV
RSHUDWLQJ
Control rooms
7KH 3KX .KDP SURFHVVLQJ RSHUDWLRQV ZHUH LQLWLDOO\ FRQWUROOHG E\ SODQW FRQWURO URRPV
ORFDWHG LQ WKH SODQW DUHDV 7KH PDLQ FRQWURO URRP ZDV ORFDWHG DW D FHQWUDO SRVLWLRQ QHDU
WKH JULQGLQJ FLUFXLW DQG RSHUDWRUV ZHUH DQ LQWHJUDO SDUW RI WKH SURFHVV FRQWURO V\VWHP
E\ ZDONLQJ WKH SODQW $W 3KX .KDP WKH FUXVKLQJ DQG ÁRWDWLRQ FLUFXLWV ZHUH FRQWUROOHG
IURP VPDOO FRQWURO KXWV ZLWKLQ WKH DUHD ZLWK RSHUDWRUV VSHQGLQJ WLPH RXW LQ WKH ÀHOG
DQG FRPLQJ EDFN WR PDNH FRQWURO DGMXVWPHQWV 7KH GLVDGYDQWDJHV RI ORFDO FRQWURO DUH
WKDW HDFK SURGXFWLRQ XQLW LV UXQ LQGHSHQGHQWO\ ZLWK PLQLPDO LQWHUDFWLRQ ZLWK RWKHU
SURGXFWLRQ XQLWV HYHQ ZLWKLQ WKH SURFHVV SODQW $Q\ FKDQJHV WR RUH EOHQGV ZHUH XVXDOO\
D VXUSULVH DQG FRQWURO ZDV UHDFWLYH %HQFKPDUNLQJ RI RWKHU RSHUDWLRQV VKRZHG WKDW
VLJQLÀFDQW DGYDQWDJHV ZHUH DFKLHYDEOH E\ KDYLQJ D FRPPRQ FHQWUDO FRQWURO URRP %RWK
3KX .KDP DQG %DQ +RXD\[DL QRZ KDYH D FHQWUDO FRQWURO URRP ZKHUH WKH PLQLQJ ÁHHW
PDQDJHPHQW V\VWHP DQG SURFHVVLQJ SODQW FRQWURO V\VWHPV DUH ORFDWHG
7KH FHQWUDOLVHG FRQWURO IDFLOLWLHV DUH ORFDWHG LQ QHXWUDO JURXQG ZLWKLQ WKH DGPLQ
LVWUDWLRQ EXLOGLQJ DQG DUH GHVLJQHG WR HQKDQFH FRPPXQLFDWLRQ EHWZHHQ EXVLQHVV XQLWV
DQG HQDEOH KROLVWLF RSHUDWLRQV FRQWURO DQG UHSRUWLQJ )LJXUH VKRZV WKH 3KX .KDP
FHQWUDOLVHG FRQWURO URRP WKDW DOORZV GLUHFW LQWHUDFWLRQ EHWZHHQ PLQLQJ DQG SURFHVVLQJ
DQG DUHD VXSHUYLVRUV $W IXWXUH RSHUDWLRQV WKH XVH RI UHPRWH FRQWURO URRPV PD\ EH
FRQVLGHUHG WR DYRLG WKH FRVWV RI WUDQVSRUWLQJ DQG DFFRPPRGDWLQJ RSHUDWRUV DW VLWH
FIG 15.5 – Phu Kham central control room (image courtesy PanAust Ltd).
Crushing
7KH SULPDU\ REMHFWLYH RI WKH FUXVKHU FRQWURO VWUDWHJ\ LV WR PRYH WKH RUH WKURXJK WKH
FUXVKHU WR WKH FRDUVH RUH VWRFNSLOH ZLWK PLQLPDO UDWH YDULDWLRQ 7KH FUXVKHU FDQ EH VHW
XS WR DFKLHYH WKH UHTXLUHG SDUWLFOH VL]H GLVWULEXWLRQ DQG IRUVDNH WKURXJKSXW E\ VKXWWLQJ
WKH FORVHG VLGH VHWWLQJ RU PD[LPLVH WKURXJKSXW E\ RSHQLQJ WKH FORVHG VLGH VHWWLQJ
7KH FUXVKHG RUH YDXOW XQGHU WKH J\UDWRU\ FUXVKHU LV ÀWWHG ZLWK D UHOLDEOH OHYHO VHQVRU
DQG WKH FUXVKHG RUH FRQYH\RU LV ÀWWHG ZLWK D ZHLJKWRPHWHU ZKLFK LV ORFDWHG DV FORVH
DV PHFKDQLFDOO\ SRVVLEOH WR WKH FUXVKHG RUH YDXOW GLVFKDUJH DSURQ IHHGHU 7KH FUXVKHG
RUH ZHLJKW FRQWUROOHU PDNHV XVH RI GHDG WLPH FRPSHQVDWLRQ WR FRQWURO WKH ORDGLQJ UDWH
RQWR WKH RYHUODQG FRQYH\RU HQVXULQJ WKH PD[LPXP UDWH LV PDLQWDLQHG ZLWKRXW WKH EHOW
EHLQJ RYHUORDGHG WKLV LPSURYHV FRQYH\RU DYDLODELOLW\ WKURXJK UHGXFHG VSLOODJH DQG EHOW
GDPDJH 7KH PLQLQJ ÁHHW PDQDJHPHQW V\VWHP UHFHLYHV LQIRUPDWLRQ IURP WKH FUXVKHU
LQFOXGLQJ WKH FXUUHQW FUXVKHU WKURXJKSXW VHW SRLQW WR SURYLGH LQSXW LQWR WUXFN QXPEHUV
IRU WKH FUXVKHU WR PHHW SURGXFWLRQ WDUJHWV
Grinding control
7KH 0: 3KX .KDP 6$* PLOO LV XVHG LQ D VWDQGDUG 6$* DQG EDOO PLOO FRQÀJXUDWLRQ
DV GHVFULEHG E\ &UQNRYLF et al ZLWK WKH 6$* PLOO SHEEOHV UHFLUFXODWLQJ WR 6$*
PLOO IHHG ,QLWLDOO\ WKH RQO\ DXWRPDWLF ORRSV LQVWDOOHG ZHUH 6$* PLOO WRQQHV IHHG UDWH DQG
ZDWHU DGGLWLRQ 7KH RSHUDWRU ZRXOG FRQWLQXDOO\ DGMXVW WKH IHHG UDWH VHW SRLQW PLOO VSHHG
DQG 6$* PLOO GHQVLW\ WR FRQWURO WKH 6$* PLOO ZHLJKW 7KH IHHG UDWH FRQWUROOHU GLG QRW
SURYLGH D VWDEOH RXWSXW DQG ZRXOG RVFLOODWH LI WKH RSHUDWRU FKDQJHG WKH VHW SRLQW RU WKH
VSHHG UDWLR EHWZHHQ WKH WZR IHHGHUV ORFDWHG XQGHU WKH FRDUVH RUH VWRFNSLOH
7KH GHYHORSHG JULQGLQJ FLUFXLW FRQWURO VWUDWHJ\ LV WR PD[LPLVH WKURXJKSXW ZKLOH
NHHSLQJ WKH SURGXFW JULQG VL]H DV ÀQH DV SRVVLEOH 6$* DQG EDOO PLOO 6$% FLUFXLWV DUH
XVHG DW ERWK WKH 3KX .KDP DQG %DQ +RXD\[DL RSHUDWLRQV ZLWK WKH FRQWURO VWUDWHJLHV
LGHQWLFDO DW ERWK SODQWV GHVSLWH GLIIHUHQW KDUGZDUH DQG VRIWZDUH SODWIRUPV 7KH 6$*
PLOO FRQWURO PRGHO ZLOO YDU\ WKH 6$* PLOO IHHG UDWH DQG VSHHG WR PDLQWDLQ WKH UHTXLUHG
PLOO ZHLJKW VHW SRLQW 7KH RSWLPDO PLOO ZHLJKW LV VHW DFFRUGLQJ WR PLOO YROXPH ZLWK
FRPSHQVDWLRQ PDGH IRU OLQHU ZHDU
$ FULWLFDO FRPSRQHQW WR DFKLHYLQJ JRRG 6$* PLOO FRQWURO LV WR KDYH VWDEOH DQG IDVW
DFWLQJ FRQWURO RI WKH IHHG UDWH 'XULQJ LQLWLDO PRGHO GHYHORSPHQW WKH ZHLJKWRPHWHU
RXWSXW ZDV IRXQG WR KDYH D VHFRQG ODJ ÀOWHU 7KLV ZDV UHPRYHG WKH IHHGHU UDWLR
FRQWURO ORJLF FKDQJHG DQG GHDGWLPH FRPSHQVDWRUV LQFOXGHG UHVXOWLQJ LQ D IDVWDFWLQJ
VWDEOH IHHG UDWH FRQWUROOHU
7KH G\QDPLFV RI WKH 3KX .KDP 6$* PLOO ZHUH WKHQ LGHQWLÀHG E\ XVLQJ WKH PHWKRGV
GHÀQHG E\ =KX ZKHUH WKH EHKDYLRXU RI WKH SURFHVV LV XVHG WR LGHQWLI\ G\QDPLF
UHVSRQVH UDWKHU WKDQ GHULYDWLRQ IURP ÀUVW SULQFLSOHV 7KH DQDO\VLV XVHG KLVWRULFDO
GDWD IURP DOO VHW SRLQW FKDQJHV WKH RSHUDWRUV KDG PDGH RYHU D VL[PRQWK SHULRG
7KH EHKDYLRXU RI WKH PLOO LQ UHVSRQVH WR FKDQJHV LQ PLOO VSHHG IHHG UDWH DQG PLOO GHQVLW\
YDULDEOHV XQGHU GLIIHUHQW FRQGLWLRQV ZDV DQDO\VHG WR GHYHORS WKH FRQWURO PRGHO IRU WKH
6$* PLOO 7KH FRQWURO PRGHO ZDV LPSOHPHQWHG LQ -DQXDU\ DQG RQO\ UHTXLUHG PLQRU
WXQLQJ FKDQJHV EHIRUH JDLQLQJ RSHUDWRU FRQÀGHQFH 7KH XWLOLVDWLRQ RI WKH PRGHO ZDV
WUDFNHG E\ WKH '&6 DQG UHFRUGHG LQ WKH KLVWRU\ WR HQVXUH WKH UHDVRQV IRU WXUQLQJ RII WKH
FRQWURO PRGHO FRXOG EH UHYLHZHG ZLWK WKH RSHUDWRU UHVSRQVLEOH
$Q DQDO\VLV RI WKH SHUIRUPDQFH RI WKH 3KX .KDP 6$* PLOO FRQWURO ZDV SHUIRUPHG E\
FRPSDULQJ WZR KRXU SHULRGV EHIRUH 1RYHPEHU DQG DIWHU )HEUXDU\ WKH
FRQWURO PRGHO ZDV LPSOHPHQWHG ZLWK GDWD EHLQJ ORJJHG HYHU\ ÀYH VHFRQGV 'XH WR
FKDQJHV LQ RUH FKDUDFWHULVWLFV RYHU VKRUW SHULRGV DW 3KX .KDP WKH PHDVXUH RI FRQWURO
SHUIRUPDQFH XVHG ZDV FRHIÀFLHQW RI YDULDQFH ZKLFK LV WKH VWDQGDUG GHYLDWLRQ YDOXH DV
D SHUFHQWDJH RI WKH PHDQ YDOXH
3ULRU WR LPSOHPHQWDWLRQ RI WKH FRQWURO PRGHO WKH 6$* PLOO ZHLJKW WHQGHG WR GULIW
DFURVV D EURDG UDQJH DV VKRZQ LQ WKH IUHTXHQF\ KLVWRJUDP LQ )LJXUH 7KH DYHUDJH
PLOO ZHLJKW FKDQJHG IURP W EHIRUH LPSOHPHQWDWLRQ WR W DIWHU LPSOHPHQWDWLRQ
ZKLOH WKH VWDQGDUG GHYLDWLRQ IURP WKH DYHUDJH ZHLJKW UHGXFHG IURP W SHU FHQW
FRHIÀFLHQW RI YDULDQFH WR W SHU FHQW FRHIÀFLHQW RI YDULDQFH LQGLFDWLQJ D VLJQLÀFDQW
LPSURYHPHQW LQ FRQWURO
7KH 6$* PLOO SRZHU VKRZQ LQ WKH )LJXUH IUHTXHQF\ KLVWRJUDP GHPRQVWUDWHV
WKH LPSURYHG SRZHU GUDZ FRQWURO ZLWK UHGXFHG GHYLDWLRQ IURP WKH PHDQ 3ULRU WR
LPSOHPHQWDWLRQ RI WKH FRQWURO PRGHO WKH PHDQ 6$* SRZHU GUDZ ZDV N: ZLWK
D VWDQGDUG GHYLDWLRQ RI N: SHU FHQW FRHIÀFLHQW RI YDULDQFH $IWHUZDUGV 6$*
PLOO PHDQ SRZHU GUDZ ZDV N: ZLWK D VWDQGDUG GHYLDWLRQ RI N: SHU FHQW
FRHIÀFLHQW RI YDULDQFH 7KH UHGXFHG VWDQGDUG GHYLDWLRQ ZDV DJDLQ DQ LQGLFDWLRQ RI
LPSURYHG 6$* PLOO FRQWURO
7KH 6$* PLOO FRQWURO V\VWHP WKURXJKSXW SHUIRUPDQFH UHYLHZ SUHVHQWHG LQ )LJXUH
LQGLFDWHV WKDW SULRU WR LPSOHPHQWDWLRQ RI WKH PRGHOEDVHG FRQWURO WKH WKURXJKSXW
DYHUDJH ZDV WK ZLWK D VWDQGDUG GHYLDWLRQ RI WK SHU FHQW FRHIÀFLHQW RI
YDULDQFH )ROORZLQJ FRQWURO PRGHO LPSOHPHQWDWLRQ WKH IHHG UDWH LQFUHDVHG WR WK
ZLWK D VWDQGDUG GHYLDWLRQ RI WK SHU FHQW FRHIÀFLHQW RI YDULDQFH
6000
5000
Frequency
4000
3000
Before
2000
After
1000
0
300
315
330
345
360
375
390
405
420
435
450
465
480
SAGMillWeight(tonnes)
FIG 15.6 – Semi-autogenous grinding (SAG) mill weight histogram (image courtesy PanAust Ltd).
5000
4000
Frequency
3000
2000 Before
1000 After
0
6000
6800
7600
8400
9200
10000
10800
11600
12400
13200
14000
14800
SAGMillPower(kW)
FIG 15.7 – Semi-autogenous grinding (SAG) mill power histogram (image courtesy PanAust Ltd).
2000
1500
Frequency
1000
Before
500 After
0 1100
1175
1250
1325
1400
1475
1550
1625
1700
1775
1850
1925
2000
2075
2150
SAGMillFeedRate(t/h)
FIG 15.8 – Semi-autogenous grinding (SAG) mill feed rate histogram (image courtesy PanAust Ltd).
$V LV ZHOO NQRZQ PD[LPLVLQJ PLOO SRZHU PHDQV LQFUHDVHG WKURXJKSXW ZKLFK ORZHUV
RSHUDWLQJ FRVWV DQG LPSURYHV FRQFHQWUDWH SURGXFWLRQ WKDW LV UHYHQXH DOO RWKHU WKLQJV
EHLQJ HTXDO 7KH GDWD SUHVHQWHG LQ )LJXUHV DQG FOHDUO\ GHPRQVWUDWHV WKLV
LPSURYHPHQW DQG WKH EHQHÀWV RI FRQWUROOLQJ SURFHVVLQJ RSHUDWLRQV
Conclusions
3URFHVV FRQWURO DFURVV DOO IDFHWV RI SURGXFWLRQ RSHUDWLRQV KDV EHHQ UHFRJQLVHG WR
PD[LPLVH FDSLWDO HIÀFLHQF\ SURGXFWLYLW\ SURGXFW TXDOLW\ DQG DVVHW XWLOLVDWLRQ 3URFHVV
FRQWURO VWUDWHJLHV FRQWURO PHWKRG GHYHORSPHQW DQG VWDQGDUGV IRU SURGXFWLRQ FRQWURO
DQG UHSRUWLQJ DUH DSSOLHG WR H[LVWLQJ VLWHV DQG QHZ SURMHFWV UHJDUGOHVV RI SURFHVV DQG
VLWHVSHFLÀF GLIIHUHQFHV LQ FRQWURO KDUGZDUH DQG VRIWZDUH
7KH GHYHORSPHQW RI RSHUDWLRQDO FRQWURO VWUDWHJLHV DQG FRQWURO VWDQGDUGV KDV IROORZHG
D WRSGRZQ DSSURDFK EDVHG RQ DXWRPDWLRQ DQG FRQWURO RI DOO NH\ LQSXWV DQG RXWSXWV
WKURXJK WKH SURGXFWLRQ FKDLQ WR PHHW ÀQDO SURGXFW TXDQWLW\ DQG TXDOLW\ WDUJHWV
'HYHORSLQJ VWDQGDUG SURFHVV FRQWURO VWUDWHJLHV DQG VSHFLÀFDWLRQ RI WKH HTXLSPHQW DQG
LQVWUXPHQWDWLRQ UHTXLUHG IRU FRQWURO GXULQJ GHVLJQ KDV SURYHQ WR UHDOLVH SURGXFWLRQ
EHQHÀWV DOPRVW DV VRRQ DV FRPPLVVLRQLQJ KDV EHHQ FRPSOHWHG
7KH LPSURYHPHQW DQG GHYHORSPHQW RI SURFHVV FRQWURO KDV IROORZHG D ERWWRPXS
DSSURDFK RI JHWWLQJ WKH ULJKW HTXLSPHQW DQG EDVLF FRQWURO LQ SODFH DQG RSHUDWLQJ UHOLDEO\
EHIRUH LQFUHDVLQJ DXWRPDWLRQ ZLWKLQ DQG EHWZHHQ SURGXFWLRQ XQLWV %\ HIIHFWLYHO\
DSSO\LQJ DGYDQFHG FRQWURO PRGHOV WR LQGLYLGXDO XQLWV RI SODQW WKH YDULDELOLW\ LQ WKHLU
PHDVXUDEOH RXWSXWV KDV EHHQ UHGXFHG 7KLV DOORZV HDFK XQLW WR PD[LPLVH SURGXFWLYLW\
DQG UXQ FRQVLVWHQWO\ WR WKH SK\VLFDO DQG TXDOLW\ FRQVWUDLQWV RI WKH SURGXFWLRQ XQLWV
7KH UHGXFHG YDULDELOLW\ LQ HDFK SURFHVVLQJ XQLW KDV EHHQ GHPRQVWUDWHG WR LPSURYH WKH
SHUIRUPDQFH RI GRZQVWUHDP XQLWV
Acknowledgements
7KH DXWKRUV DFNQRZOHGJH WKH VXSSRUW RI 3DQ$XVW PDQDJHPHQW DQG WKH FRQWULEXWLRQ
RI RSHUDWRUV DQG PHWDOOXUJLVWV DW 3KX .KDP DQG %DQ +RXD\[DL ZKR SURYLGHG YDOXDEOH
IHHGEDFN GXULQJ GHYHORSPHQW RI WKH DGYDQFHG FRQWURO PRGHOV LPSOHPHQWHG :LWKRXW
WKH SRVLWLYH GDLO\ LQSXW DQG LQVLJKW LQWR WKH SURFHVV WKH FRQWURO PRGHOV FRXOG QRW KDYH
SURYLGHG WKH UREXVW OHYHO RI FRQWURO DFKLHYHG
Priŵary
Kre
Kdžide
Kre
FIG 15.10 – Ahafo comminution circuit (MMD Sizer, gyratory/pebble crushers and mills) (image courtesy Hakan Dundar).
GLVFKDUJH RQWR WKH 6$* IHHG FRQYH\RU 7KH JULQGLQJ FLUFXLW FRQVLVWV RI D P ¡ ð
P (*/ IW ¡ ð IW > IW (*/@ 0HWVR 6$* PLOO ZLWK D N: GXDO SLQLRQ
GULYH DQG D IW ¡ ð IW 0HWVR EDOO PLOO DOVR ZLWK D N: GULYH LQ FORVHG FLUFXLW
ZLWK D FOXVWHU RI ð PP ¡ LQ ¡ F\FORQHV 3HEEOHV DUH UHF\FOHG WR EXIIHU ELQV DQG
FUXVKHG E\ D KHDY\GXW\ 0HWVR 03 FUXVKHU
7KH SURSRUWLRQ RI RUH H[WUDFWHG IURP GLIIHUHQW SLWV YDULHV RYHU WLPH 7KH $SHQVX
RUH LV ÀQHU DQG VRIWHU DQG WKH SODQW WHQGV WR EH PRUH RIWHQ EDOO PLOO OLPLWHG ZKHQ WKH
SURSRUWLRQ RI $SHQVX RUH LV KLJKHU 7KH 6XELND RUH LV JHQHUDOO\ KDUGHU LW UHTXLUHV
PRUH 6$* PLOOLQJ DQG LV NQRZQ WR \LHOG KLJKHU JROG UHFRYHULHV 7KH R[LGH RUH FRPHV
IURP WKH XSSHU OHYHOV RI WKH GHSRVLW ,W LV FRQYHQLHQW WR SURFHVV PRUH R[LGH RUH ZKHQ
WKH FLUFXLW EHFRPHV 6$* PLOO OLPLWHG *ULQGLQJ LV D FULWLFDO SDUW RI WKH SURFHVV VLQFH
JROG UHFRYHU\ LV YHU\ VHQVLWLYH WR JULQG VL]H ,Q RUGHU WR DFKLHYH D JRRG JROG UHFRYHU\
LW LV QHFHVVDU\ WR SURGXFH D SDUWLFOH VL]H GLVWULEXWLRQ 36' ZLWK SHU FHQW RU PRUH
SDVVLQJ ǍP
Conventional controls
7KH LQVWUXPHQWDWLRQ RI WKH JULQGLQJ FLUFXLW LV FRPSUHKHQVLYH DQG ZHOO PDLQWDLQHG
7KHUH DUH IRXU ZHLJKWRPHWHUV PHDVXULQJ WRQQDJH RI R[LGH RUH WRWDO IUHVK IHHG R[LGH
SOXV SULPDU\ RUH WRWDO PLOO IHHG LQFOXGLQJ UHF\FOHG SHEEOHV OLPH DQG JULQGLQJ EDOOV
DQG SHEEOHV SURGXFHG E\ WKH 6$* PLOO 0RVW ZDWHU DGGLWLRQV DUH PHDVXUHG DV ZHOO DV
WKH SRZHU ORDG FDOFXODWHG IURP EHDULQJ SUHVVXUH DQG URWDWLRQDO VSHHG RI WKH 6$*
PLOO 6$* VSHHG LV FRQWUROOHG ZLWK D OLTXLG UHVLVWDQFH VWDUWHU /56 EXW DV IUHTXHQWO\
UHTXLUHG E\ /56 WKH PLOO VSHHG VKRXOG QRW EH PRGLÀHG FRQWLQXRXVO\ RU IUHTXHQWO\
7KH VXPS LQWR ZKLFK ERWK PLOOV GLVFKDUJH LV HTXLSSHG ZLWK D YDULDEOH VSHHG SXPS
DQG D OHYHO SUREH +\GURF\FORQH IHHG UDWH GHQVLW\ DQG SUHVVXUH DUH PHDVXUHG DQG WKH
K\GURF\FORQHV DUH DXWRPDWHG
7KLV LQLWLDO LQVWUXPHQWDWLRQ ZDV VXSSOHPHQWHG DW WKH VWDUW RI WKH DGYDQFHG FRQWURO
SURMHFW ZLWK 9LVLR5RFN FDPHUDV WR PHDVXUH RUH VL]H GLVWULEXWLRQ RQOLQH DQG DQ
$XGLR0LOO PLFURSKRQH WR DQDO\VH WKH VRXQG JHQHUDWHG E\ WKH 6$* PLOO DQG GHWHFW
GLUHFW LPSDFWV RI PDWHULDO RQ WKH OLQHUV $Q 2XWRWHF 36,® VHQVRU PHDVXUHV WKH 36' RI
F\FORQHV RYHUÁRZ DQG WKH UHVXOW LV LQWHJUDWHG LQWR WKH FRQWURO ORJLF 7KH FRQWURO URRP
LV ORFDWHG QHDU WKH PLOOV
Disturbances
7KH W\SLFDO IXQFWLRQ RI DQ $3& V\VWHP LV WR UHDFW WR GLVWXUEDQFHV VR WKDW PD[LPXP
WKURXJKSXW UHDVRQDEO\ VWDEOH RSHUDWLRQ DQG VXLWDEOH SURGXFW TXDOLW\ DUH FRQWLQXRXVO\
DFKLHYHG 7KH PDLQ GLVWXUEDQFHV DW $KDIR DUH
x Changes in ore type, hardness and size distribution 7KLV UHVXOWV IURP WKH KHWHURJHQHLW\
RI WKH GHSRVLW DQG WKH LQHYLWDEOH GLVFRQWLQXLWLHV DGGHG E\ WKH RSHUDWLRQ RI WKH PLQH
EODVWLQJ DQG WUXFN WUDQVSRUWDWLRQ DUH GLVFRQWLQXRXV E\ WKHLU QDWXUH
x Segregation in the stockpile 7KH FRDUVHVW URFNV WHQG WR UROO GRZQ WR WKH SHULSKHUDO
SDUWV RI WKH VWRFNSLOH $OWKRXJK VRRQHU RU ODWHU DOO SDUWLFOHV RI RUH DUH SURFHVVHG
WKH SURSRUWLRQ RI URFNV DQG ÀQH SDUWLFOHV LQ WKH PDWHULDO H[WUDFWHG E\ WKH DSURQ
IHHGHUV FKDQJH RYHU WLPH DQG DUH PRUH YDULDEOH WKDQ WKH SURSRUWLRQ SURGXFHG E\
WKH SULPDU\ FUXVKHU
x Availability of oxide ore 7KH DYDLODELOLW\ RI R[LGH RUH LV OLPLWHG E\ WKH RSHUDWLRQ RI WKH
PLQH $IWHU KHDY\ UDLQV LW FDQ EH WHPSRUDULO\ LPSRVVLEOH WR IHHG R[LGH RUH QRUPDOO\
x On/off operation of the pebble crushers 7KH LQVWDQWDQHRXV FDSDFLW\ RI DQ 03 SHEEOH
FUXVKHU H[FHHGV WKH W\SLFDO RSHUDWLQJ IHHG UDWH ZKLFK OHDGV WR RSHUDWLQJ WKH FUXVKHUV
GLVFRQWLQXRXVO\ 7KLV PDMRU LQFRQYHQLHQFH LV DWWHQXDWHG E\ FUXVKLQJ DV ÀQH DV
SRVVLEOH EXW LQ SUDFWLFH WKH RSHUDWLRQ UHPDLQV F\FOLF ZLWK RQH FUXVKHU RQ IRU WHQ
PLQXWHV DQG ERWK FUXVKHUV RII IRU ÀYH PLQXWHV DQG VR RQ
7KHVH GLVWXUEDQFHV PDNH LW GLIÀFXOW WR RSHUDWH WKH SODQW VDWLVIDFWRULO\ HLWKHU PDQXDOO\
RU ZLWK D VLPSOH FRQWURO ORJLF DQG WKXV MXVWLI\ WKH GHFLVLRQ WR LPSOHPHQW DQ $3&
V\VWHP
VisioRock, AudioMill and the soft sensor generate information that complements
data collected by conventional sensors. VisioRock provides information to the soft
sensor and directly to the expert system, while AudioMill and the soft sensor provide
information to the expert system.
VisioRock system
The main physical components of the VisioRock system (seen in Figure 15.11) are:
x a camera, which is installed above the SAG feed conveyor belt (before any addition
of recycled pebbles, lime or grinding media) and connected to a LAN (local area
network)
x a shielding and lighting system to protect the area of the conveyor observed by the
camera from the light of the day and to light it optimally
x DÀHOGFDELQHWORFDWHGQHDUWKHFDPHUDDUHD
VisioRock analyses several images of the belt per second, estimates particle size
distribution for each image and delivers an average estimate every 20 seconds. In the
case of Ahafo, VisioRock estimates 13 size classes from -6 mm to +225 mm and computes
special points of the PSD; that is, P20, P40, P60, P80 and P100 (top size) and proportions of
PPÀQHV²PPDQG!PPURFNV6RPHRIWKHVHGDWDDUHXVHGLQWKH
control logic and others are stored in the information system.
AudioMill system
The physical components of the AudioMill system are:
x an industrially hardened microphone installed at a distance of a few tens of
centimetres from the mill shell, near the area of the toe of the charge
x a junction box with a local antenna and a source of power, to power the microphone
and emit the signal; mill sound is transmitted from the mill area to the control room
wirelessly
x D rHcHStiRQ DQtHQQD DQG D rHcHiYHr iQ tKH cRQtrRO rRRP OiQNHG tR D VuitDEOH DuGiR
cDrG iQ tKH cRPSutHr
6SHDNHrSKRQHV iQ tKH cRQtrRO rRRP PDNH it SRVViEOH IRr RSHrDtRrV tR OiVtHQ tR tKH
RriJiQDO QRQÀOtHrHG QRiVH RI tKH PiOO IrRP tKH cRQtrRO rRRP $uGiR0iOO cRQtiQuRuVO\
PHDVurHV tKH VRuQG iQtHQVit\ IRr PDQ\ IrHTuHQciHV DQG cDOcuODtHV DQ iPSDct OHYHO
$YHrDJH YDOuHV DrH VHQt tR tKH cRQtrRO ORJic HYHr\ tHQ VHcRQGV ,Q RrGHr tR GHtHrPiQH tKH
iPSDct OHYHO $uGiR0iOO ¶OiVtHQV· tR KRZ tKH PDtHriDO tKrRZQ E\ HDcK OiItHr IDOOV ,I it IDOOV
RYHr tKH cKDrJH tKH VRuQG iV rDtKHr cRQtiQuRuV ,I it IDOOV RYHr tKH OiQHrV it IDOOV DV ZDYHV
² RQH ZDYH SHr OiItHr $t $KDIR tKHrH DrH KiJK OiItHr EDrV DQG ORZ OiItHr EDrV DQG
$uGiR0iOO GiVcriPiQDtHV EHtZHHQ tKH iPSDctV JHQHrDtHG E\ HDcK t\SH
Control strategy
General
7KH cRQtrRO VtrDtHJ\ uVHV iQIRrPDtiRQ JHQHrDtHG E\ cRQYHQtiRQDO iQVtruPHQtDtiRQ tKH
9iViR5RcN DQG $uGiR0iOO V\VtHPV DQG tKH 2&6 VRIt VHQVRr tR DQDO\VH tKH SrRcHVV
DQG ZritH VHt SRiQtV iQ tKH SrRJrDPPDEOH ORJic cRQtrROOHrV 3/&V HYHr\ tHQ VHcRQGV
7KH cRQtrRO VtrDtHJ\ iV cRQÀJurHG DV VHtV RI Iu]]\ ORJic DQG criVS ruOHV iQ tKH 2&6
H[SHrt V\VtHP PRGuOH 7KH VtrDtHJ\ cKHcNV tKH crHGiEiOit\ RI tKH GDtD rHcHiYHG IrRP
tKH VHQVRrV DQG DQDO\VHV tKH SrRcHVV tR GHtHct HPHrJHQc\ VituDtiRQV tKDt rHTuirH
iPPHGiDtH rHDctiRQV tR DYRiG PDMRr SrREOHPV Rr SODQt VtRSV VucK DV 6$* PiOO RYHrORDG
tKH SRZHr EHiQJ tRR KiJK IRr VRPH PRtRrV DQG tKH SDcNiQJ RI cOD\ PDtHriDO EHtZHHQ
tKH OiItHr EDrV 7KH rHVSRQVHV tR HPHrJHQc\ VituDtiRQV cRQViVt RI ViJQiÀcDQt cKDQJHV iQ
ZDtHr DGGitiRQV DQG iQ IHHG rDtH RI SriPDr\ RrH Rr R[iGH RrH
7KH HTuiYDOHQt SriPDr\ IHHG (3) rDtH iV DQ iPSRrtDQt cRQcHSt iQ tKH $3& VtrDtHJ\
Dt $KDIR ZKHrH it cRPEiQHV IHHGIRrZDrG DQG IHHGEDcN DctiRQV tR DQticiSDtH tKH
cRQVHTuHQcHV RI GiVturEDQcHV VucK DV cKDQJHV iQ DYDiODEiOit\ RI R[iGH RrH 7KH IHHG
rDtH RStiPiViQJ VtrDtHJ\ GRHV QRt PDQiSuODtH tKH SriPDr\ RrH IHHG rDtH GirHctO\ it
PDQiSuODtHV tKH (3) ZKicK iV DQ iQtHrQDO VHt SRiQt 7KH VHt SRiQt IRr tKH SriPDr\ RrH
IHHG rDtH iV cRPSutHG DV D IuQctiRQ RI tKH (3) VHt SRiQt tKH tRQQDJH RI rHc\cOHG SHEEOHV
tKH 36' RI SriPDr\ IHHG PHDVurHG E\ 9iViR5RcN DQG tKH tRQQDJH RI R[iGHV 7KH ORJic
tDNHV iQtR DccRuQt tKH QuPHrRuV GHDG tiPHV tKDt rHVuOt IrRP tKH OHQJtK RI tKH EHOtV )Rr
iQVtDQcH tKH GHDG tiPH EHtZHHQ tKH tKirG IHHGHr DQG 6$* iQOHt iV DrRuQG tKrHH PiQutHV
ZKicK iV ViJQiÀcDQt cRPSDrHG tR D IRurPiQutH PHDQ rHViGHQcH tiPH iQ tKH 6$* PiOO
7KiV iQtHrQDO VHt SRiQt KHOSV tR DGGrHVV GiVturEDQcHV VucK DV cKDQJH iQ IHHG 36' ODcN RI
DYDiODEiOit\ RI R[iGH RrH DQG GiVcRQtiQuRuV rHc\cOiQJ RI SHEEOHV
iQViGH tKH PiOO iV RQH RI tKH EHQHÀtV RI D VRIt VHQVRr 7KH VOurr\ VROiGV GHQVit\ IHHGiQJ
tKH K\GrRc\cORQHV iV cRQtrROOHG Dt D À[HG VHt SRiQt ZKHQ tKH circuit iV EDOO PiOO OiPitHG
DQG iV DutRPDticDOO\ GHcrHDVHG ZKHQ tKH circuit iV 6$* PiOO OiPitHG iQ RrGHr tR DcKiHYH
D VtHHSHr DQG ÀQHr cut ZitK tKH K\GrRc\cORQHV
Project implementation
7KH SrRMHct ZDV VuccHVVIuO EHcDuVH RI tKH VtrRQJ iQYROYHPHQt E\ VtDII Dt 1HZPRQt DQG
0HtVR 1HZPRQt·V DctiYH iQYROYHPHQt cRYHrHG DVSHctV DV GiYHrVH DV iQVtDOOiQJ YiViRQ
DQG DcRuVticV KDrGZDrH PDNiQJ VurH NH\ 1HZPRQt rHVRurcHV ZHrH DYDiODEOH Dt tKH riJKt
tiPH cRQtriEutiQJ tR tKH GHViJQ RI tKH cRQtrRO VtrDtHJ\ DOORZiQJ rHPRtH DccHVV tR tKH
2&6 cRPSutHr tKrRuJK tKH VHcurit\ V\VtHP DQG HQcRurDJiQJ RSHrDtRrV tR uQGHrVtDQG
DQG uOtiPDtHO\ truVt tKH 2&6 V\VtHP
$Q iQitiDO cRQtrRO VtrDtHJ\ ZDV GHÀQHG MRiQtO\ E\ 1HZPRQt VtDII DQG 0HtVR VSHciDOiVtV
DQG tKHQ cRQÀJurHG iQ 2&6 ,Q SDrDOOHO 0HtVR cRQÀJurHG DQG tuQHG tKH VRIt VHQVRr
7KH cRQtrRO VtrDtHJ\ ZDV tKHQ tHVtHG DQG rHÀQHG EDVHG RQ SODQt REVHrYDtiRQV DQG tKH
V\VtHP ZDV RSHrDtiRQDO OHVV tKDQ Vi[ PRQtKV DItHr ViJQDturH RI tKH cRQtrDct 5HPRtH
DccHVV ZDV HVtDEOiVKHG HDrO\ iQ tKH SrRMHct 7KH cROODERrDtiRQ ViJQiÀcDQtO\ cRQtriEutHG tR
tKH JRRG DccHStDQcH RI tKH $3& V\VtHP E\ tKH RSHrDtRrV
System performance
$ \HDr DItHr tKH $3& V\VtHP ZDV Sut iQ RSHrDtiRQ itV DYDiODEiOit\ iV QHDr SHr cHQt IRr
H[DPSOH EHtZHHQ 'HcHPEHr DQG 0D\ 2&6 cRQtrROOHG tKH SODQt SHr cHQt
RI tKH tiPH 7KH YHr\ IHZ tiPHV tKDt tKH $3& V\VtHP ZDV QRt DYDiODEOH ZDV cDuVHG E\
SrREOHPV ZitK tKH 23& VHrYHr OicHQcH iQGHSHQGHQt RI 2&6 DQG ZKHQ 9iViR5RcN ZDV
tHPSRrDriO\ uQDYDiODEOH DItHr D SrREOHP ZitK tKH SrHVVurH DQG TuDOit\ RI tKH cRPSrHVVHG
Dir IRr tKH Dir EDrriHr tKDt NHHSV tKH cDPHrD ZiQGRZ cOHDQ SHrPDQHQtO\
1HZPRQt·V HYDOuDtiRQ iV tKDt tKH $3& V\VtHP DORQH JHQHrDtHV D SHr cHQt iQcrHDVH
iQ tRQQDJH SOuV D SHr cHQt iQcrHDVH iQ rHcRYHr\ 7KH tZR IDctRrV cRPEiQHG JiYH D
SHr cHQt iQcrHDVH iQ RuQcHV
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Chapter 16
CIRCUIT DESIGN
Bianca Foggiatto, Marcos Bueno,
Eddie McLean, Greg Lane and Chris Morley
PROJECT DEFINITION
Determining the project concept precedes all other tasks in the design of a comminution
circuit. Factors to be taken into account include the:
x location of the orebody
x nature of the ore (geological and mineral characteristics)
x local environmental restrictions
x SURGXFWVSHFLÀFDWLRQVZKHUHWKHVHLQÁXHQFHSURFHVVLQJVWUDWHJ\
x ZDWHUDQGHQHUJ\DYDLODELOLW\DQGFRVWV
7KHSURFHVVWRREWDLQWKHÀQDOSURGXFWPXVWEHHVWDEOLVKHGRIZKLFKFRPPLQXWLRQLV
DQLPSRUWDQWSDUW$OWHUQDWLYHVIRUFRPPLQXWLRQFLUFXLWGHVLJQDUHLQWHJUDOWRÁRZVKHHW
development.
TABLE 16.1
Required number of samples during feasibility studies (modified from Lane, Foggiatto and Bueno, 2013).
Basis Number of samples Comments
Spatial representativity >100 Includes samples from Phase 1 and 2
Hard-wired ore types 10 to 30 Includes samples from Phase 1 and 2
Mine period production 5 to 8 Includes samples from Phase 3
DESIGN CRITERIA
In the early stages of project development only limited data are available and
FDOFXODWLRQVRIHTXLSPHQWVL]HXVHWKHPD[LPXPRUDYHUDJHRIWKHUDQJH7UHQGVLQRUH
hardness are assessed by making incremental increases in data values and repeating
WKHFDOFXODWLRQV&RPSDUDEOHLQGXVWU\GDWDRULQKRXVHGDWDIURPVLPLODURUHW\SHVDUH
XVHGIRUEHQFKPDUNLQJ$VWKHSURMHFWGHYHORSVWKHYROXPHDQGFRPSOH[LW\RIGDWD
WKDW GHVFULEH RUH FKDUDFWHULVWLFV DQG YDULDELOLW\ LQFUHDVH DQG SODQW IHHG VFKHGXOHV ²
ZKLFKLQFOXGHYDU\LQJWRQQDJHJHRWHFKQLFDOGDWDJUDGHOLWKRORJ\DQGPLQHUDOLVDWLRQ
DQG RUH H[SORLWDWLRQ VHTXHQFH ² FDQ EH FRQVLGHUHG ,QSXW GDWD DQG LQIRUPDWLRQ IRU
VWXGLHVIURPFRQFHSWWRÀQDOIHDVLELOLW\FRPHIURPVHYHUDOVRXUFHVDQGFDQEHJURXSHG
DVIROORZV
x 3URMHFWRSHUDWLQJDQGSURGXFWLRQSDUDPHWHUVZKLFKDUHW\SLFDOO\VHWE\WKHSURMHFW
RZQHU7KHVHIRUPSDUWRIWKHGHVLJQEDVLVVXFKDVRSHUDWLQJVFKHGXOHDQGDYDLODELOLWLHV
x 7HVW ZRUN E\ ODERUDWRULHV YHQGRUV DQG FRQVXOWDQWV UHVRXUFH PRGHOV DQG
FRQVXOWDQWV·UHSRUWV7KHVHDUHWKHPDLQVRXUFHVRIGDWDIRUWKHSURMHFWDVWKH\FRQWDLQ
GHWDLOHGWHVWZRUNDQGDQDO\VHVIRUWKHUHVRXUFHLWVJHRORJ\JHRWHFKQLFDOGDWDPLQH
SODQDOOXQLWSURFHVVHVWKHZDWHUTXDOLW\DQGHQYLURQPHQWDOFRQWUROV
x 2SHUDWLQJSUDFWLFHDQGLQGXVWU\VWDQGDUGV6RXUFHVRIGDWDDUHLQKRXVHH[SHULHQFH
RSHUDWLQJKLVWRU\RQVLPLODUWUHDWPHQWSODQWVDQGSXEOLVKHGRUFRQÀUPHGRSHUDWLQJ
information.
x 9HQGRUGDWDKDQGERRNDQGUHJXODWRU\DQGHQYLURQPHQWDOVWDQGDUGV
x ,QKRXVHGHVLJQDQGRSHUDWLQJDQGFRPPLVVLRQLQJGDWDEDVHV
Purpose
The design criteria value:
x LVDQLQGLYLGXDOUDWHRUXQLWXVHGIRUVL]LQJHTXLSPHQW
x is attainable at the stated operating conditions
x H[FOXGHV DGGLWLRQDO GHVLJQ DOORZDQFHV E\ WKH HQJLQHHU RU YHQGRU WR HQVXUH
attainment.
The design criteria values are used for four main purposes:
input data for process calculations
2. LQSXWGDWDIRUPDVVZDWHUDQGHQHUJ\EDODQFHV
3. XQLWGHVLJQSDUDPHWHUVIRUHTXLSPHQWVL]LQJ
data essential for design or to prevent ambiguity.
Function
7KH VFKHPDWLF ÁRZ FKDUW RI DFWLYLWLHV LQ )LJXUH LOOXVWUDWHV WKH SLYRWDO UROH RI WKH
design criteria in collating data from several sources and channelling this data for mass
EDODQFHZRUNDQGIRURWKHUFDOFXODWLRQV'HULYHGYDOXHVIURPPDVVEDODQFHVFDOFXODWLRQV
DQGHTXLSPHQWVL]LQJDUHQRWLQFOXGHGLQWKHGHVLJQFULWHULDH[FHSWWRSURYLGHFODULW\
and avoid ambiguity.
Codes
7KHGHVLJQFULWHULDDQGYDOXHVDUHSURMHFWVSHFLÀFDQGFRPHIURPVHYHUDOVRXUFHV7KHGDWD
DQGUHIHUHQFHVDUHFRGHGWRUHDGLO\LGHQWLI\WKHLUVRXUFHW\SLFDOO\DVVKRZQLQ7DEOH
FIG 16.2 – Schematic logic showing role of design criteria (image courtesy Ausenco).
TABLE 16.2
Coded sources of data for design criteria (provided by Ausenco).
Code Source of data or information for design criteria
1 Data provided by client (client or owner documents that nominate project parameters; and written instructions or formal
responses that contain decisions for the project)
2 Test work data
3 Reports and supporting studies (consultants’ reports; and analyses and studies, the outcomes from which are validated
data and defined parameters)
4 Standard industry practice, acceptable operating practice
5 Vendor data that nominates specific information relating to the design
6 Engineering handbook, textbook data
7 Regulatory standards, codes and compliance – operational and environmental, nominated in project documents or
governed by conditions of contract
8 Recommendation, standard procedures or in-house data from engineer
9 Not available – to be provided from test work and/or others when available; assumed value, to be confirmed by client
Regrind
This circuit is used to grind the rougher
concentrate Àner to enhance mineral
liberation and improve grades in
cleaner Áotation stages. Ball mills can
be followed by tertiary milling using
vertical mills.
&ircuit selection may be inÁuenced by plant capacity and ore competency, as shown
in Table 16.3.
2ther factors considered as part of circuit selection include nature of the ore, test
work and sample requirements (for example, pilot trials if required), client preference,
location and terrain (layout issues), local and international practice based on scale of
operations and ore characteristics, energy cost and circuit energy efÀciency.
TABLE 16.3
Selection of circuit type by ore competency and throughput (adapted from Lane, Foggiatto and Bueno, 2013).
Throughput High competency Moderate competency Low competency
<0.5 Mt/a 2CB or 3CB 1C-SAG or 2C-SAG or 2CB or 3CB SS-SAG
0.5–2 Mt/a 2CB or 3CB or SABC SAB SS-SAG or SAB
1–5 Mt/a SABC SAB or ABC SS-SAG or SAB
5–10 Mt/a SABC SAB or ABC SAB
>10 Mt/a SABC or 2C-HPGRB SABC SAB
2CB – 2 crushers, 1 ball mill SAG – semi-autogenous grinding
SAB – SAG and ball mill circuit SABC – SAG and ball mill with pebble crusher circuit
ABC – AG and ball mill with pebble crusher circuit HPGR – high-pressure grinding rolls
SS – single stage
Total Ecs = 9]Bond Ecs to 150 nmg # a fSAG - F80effect kC ! 7Bond Ecs to final P80A
7KHRYHUDOOVSHFLÀFJULQGLQJHQHUJ\WRUHGXFHDSULPDU\FUXVKHUSURGXFWZLWKP of
PPWRDÀQDOSURGXFWPRIPLVHVWLPDWHGIRUWKUHHFLUFXLWFRQÀJXUDWLRQVLQ
WKHIROORZLQJH[DPSOHV
SABC circuit
%RQGSRZHUFDOFXODWLRQVDUHFRQGXFWHGIRUHDFK:RUN,QGH[
x &UXVKLQJVSHFLÀFHQHUJ\IURPFRIPPWRPRIPP
10 - 10 10 10
-
C Ecs = CWi # e P80 F80 o = 15.0 # c 10 000 100 000
m = 1.0 kWh/t
x 5RGPLOOVSHFLÀFHQHUJ\IURPFRIPPWRP of 2 mm
10 - 10 10 - 10
R Ecs = RWi # e P80 F80 o = 16.5 # c 2000 10 000
m = 2.0 kWh/t
x %DOOPLOOVSHFLÀFHQHUJ\IURPF of 2 mm to PRIPP
10 - 10 10 - 10
B Ecs = BWi # e P80 F80 o = 15.1 # c 150 2000
m = 9.0 kWh/t
x %DOOPLOOVSHFLÀFHQHUJ\IURPFRIPPWRÀQDOPRIPP
10 - 10 10 - 10
B Ecs = BWi # e P80 F80 o = 15.1 # c 106 150
m = 2.3 kWh/t
FIG 16.3 – SAG Ecs relationship with ore hardness – DWi (image courtesy Ausenco).
The main variables affecting the adjusting factors selected for the Ausgrind base case
DUHDVIROORZV
x $VSHFWUDWLR ńfaspect ratio
7KHDVSHFWUDWLRIDFWRULVVHWWRDQGLQFUHDVHVDVWKHDVSHFWUDWLRLQFUHDVHV
x %DOOORDG WHQSHUFHQWńfball load
The ball load factor changes as a function of ball load. Higher ball loads result in
ORZHU6$*PLOOVSHFLÀFHQHUJ\
x Feed size (F PPń fF 80
The feed size factor is set at unity as a function of ore competency. It changes
EDVHGRQPLQHEODVWGHVLJQJHRWHFKQLFDOIDFWRUVSUHFUXVKHUVHWWLQJVDQGRWKHU
DVSHFWVRIGHVLJQWKDWLPSDFWRQ6$*PLOOIHHGVL]H*HQHUDOO\DPPUHGXFWLRQ
in FUHVXOWVLQDWKUHHWRÀYHSHUFHQWUHGXFWLRQLQ6$*PLOOVSHFLÀFHQHUJ\
x 3HEEOHUHF\FOH SHUFHQWńfpebble recycle
The pebble recycle factor is set to unity for a standard pebble recycle condition.
7KHVWDQGDUGFRQGLWLRQLVDIXQFWLRQRIRUHFRPSHWHQF\DQG6$*PLOOEDOOORDG
,QWKLVFDVHDOOWKHFRUUHFWLRQIDFWRUVDUHHTXDOWRRQHEHFDXVHVWDQGDUGFRQGLWLRQVZHUH
VHOHFWHGKRZHYHULIWKHDIRUHPHQWLRQHGYDOXHVGHVFULEHGYDU\IURPWKHVHOHFWHGUDQJH
WKHVH IDFWRUV ZRXOG YDU\ DFFRUGLQJ WR )LJXUHV DQG SUHVHQWHG LQ &KDSWHU
7KHZRUNHGH[DPSOHVWKDWIROORZVKRZKRZWKHVHYDOXHVPD\YDU\
SAG mill ECS = 5Base Case SAG Ecs? # 6adjusting factors@ = 8.1 # 1.0 = 8.1 kWh/t
Ball mill ECS = Total Ecs - SAG mill Ecs = 18.1 - 8.1 = 10.0 kWh/t
x 5RGPLOOVSHFLÀFHQHUJ\IURPFRIPPWRP of 2 mm
x %DOOPLOOVSHFLÀFHQHUJ\IURPF of 2 mm to PRIPP
x %DOOPLOOVSHFLÀFHQHUJ\IURPFRIPPWRÀQDOPRIPP
Ball mill Ecs = Total Ecs - HPGR Ecs = 13.5 - 2.5 = 11.0 kWh/t
10 - 10 10 10
-
C Ecs = CWi # e P80 F80 o = 15.0 # c 10 000 20 000
m = 0.4 kWh/t
x 5RGPLOOVSHFLÀFHQHUJ\IURPFRIPPWRP of 2 mm
x %DOOPLOOVSHFLÀFHQHUJ\IURPF of 2 mm to PRIPP
x %DOOPLOOVSHFLÀFHQHUJ\IURPFRIPPWRÀQDOPRIPP
B Ecs = 2.3 kWh/t
,Q WKLV FDVH WKH EDOO PLOO VSHFLÀF HQHUJ\ LV HTXDO WR WKH FRUUHFWHG JULQGLQJ VSHFLÀF
HQHUJ\7KHWKUHHFUXVKHUV·VSHFLÀFHQHUJLHVDUHFDOFXODWHGVHSDUDWHO\
7KUHH FLUFXLWV DUH HYDOXDWHG 6$%& +3*5EDOO PLOO DQG FRQYHQWLRQDO VWDJH FUXVK
IROORZHGE\EDOOPLOO7KHRYHUDOOVSHFLÀFJULQGLQJHQHUJ\WRUHGXFHDSULPDU\FUXVKHU
SURGXFWDVWKHIHHGWRJULQGLQJZLWKDPRIPPWRDÀQDOSURGXFWPRIPP
LVGHWHUPLQHGDVIROORZV
7KHIROORZLQJJHQHUDOVL]HUHGXFWLRQHTXDWLRQSURSRVHGE\0RUUHOOLVXWLOLVHGWR
FDOFXODWHWKHVSHFLÀFHQHUJ\
x i x
Wi = 4 # Mi # ` x2f_ 2 - x1f_ 1ij
ZKHUH
Wi LVWKHVSHFLÀFHQHUJ\N:KW
x and x2 DUHWKHSHUFHQWSDVVLQJVL]HIRUWKHSURGXFWDQGIHHGPUHVSHFWLYHO\
Ki is a constant for open and closed circuits
SABC circuit
Coarse particle tumbling mill specific energy
Wa = 4 # 0.95 # 19.4 # `750-]0.295 + 750/1000 000g - 100 000-]0.295 + 100000/1000 000gj = 9.6 kWh/t
Wc = 4 # 1.19 # 7.2 # `12 000-]0.295 + 12 000/1000 000g - 52 500-]0.295 + 52 500/1000 000gj = 1.12 kWh/t
7KH SHEEOH FUXVKHU IHHG UDWH LV H[SHFWHG WR EH SHU FHQW RI QHZ IHHG WRQQDJH
,IH[SUHVVHGLQWHUPVRIWKH6$%&FLUFXLWQHZIHHGWKHQ
WT = / Wi = 18.3 kWh/t
Wa = 4 # 1.0 # 19.4 # ]750-]0.295 + 750/1000 000g - 4000-]0.295 + 4000/1000 000gg = 4.5 kWh/t
Wb = 4 # 1.0 # 18.8 # ]106-]0.295 + 106/1000 000g - 750-]0.295 + 750/1000 000gg = 8.4 kWh/t
WT = / Wi = 15.7 kWh/t
Wc = 4 # 1.0 # 7.2 # ]6500-]0.295 + 6500/1000 000g - 100 000-]0.295 + 100 000/1000 000gg = 1.7 kWh/t
Wa = 4 # 1.0 # 19.4 # ]750-]0.295 + 750/1000 000g - 6500-]0.295 + 6500/1000 000gg = 5.5 kWh/t
Wb = 4 # 1.0 # 18.8 # ]106-]0.295 + 106/1000 000g - 750-]0.295 + 750/1000 000gg = 8.4 kWh/t
Crushers
7KHVHOHFWLRQRIFUXVKHUVLVLQÁXHQFHGE\URFNFKDUDFWHULVWLFVDQGFDSDFLW\7KHPDLQ
URFNFKDUDFWHULVWLFVWKDWDUHWDNHQLQWRDFFRXQWDUHIHHGWRSVL]HPD[LPXPHQGSURGXFW
VL]HKDUGQHVVDEUDVLYHQHVVSUHVHQFHRIFOD\PLQHUDOVDQGPRLVWXUH
$FFRUGLQJ WR FUXVKHU YHQGRUV WKH FUXVKHG SURGXFW FKDUDFWHULVWLFV GHSHQG RQ WKH
combined impact of the rock characteristics and the crusher operational parameters.
7DEOH VKRZV D EDVLF JXLGHOLQH IRU FUXVKHU DSSOLFDWLRQV SURSRVHG E\ 0HWVR
0LQHUDOV
TABLE 16.4
Guidelines for crusher application (adapted from Metso Minerals, 2008).
Major crusher type Typical process Maximum Typical maximum Typical Amount
stage feed size end product size capacities of fines
(mm) (mm) (t/h) produced
Gyratory crusher Primary 1500 200–300 Over 1200 Low
Jaw crusher Primary 1400 200–300 Up to 1600a Low
Horizontal impact crusher Primary/secondary 1300 200–300 Up to 1800 Medium/high
Cone crusher Secondary 450 60–80 Up to 1200 Low
Cone crusher Tertiary 300 10–30 Up to 1000 Low/medium
Vertical-shaft impactors Secondary/tertiary 150 5–20 Up to 600 High
a. When installed with a preceding grizzly to remove fines.
7KHÀUVWVWHSLQVHOHFWLQJDFUXVKHULVWRGHÀQHWKHDVUHFHLYHGRUHWRSVL]HUHODWHGWR
RUHSURSHUWLHVDQGEODVWLQJDQGWKHUHTXLUHGFUXVKHUJDSHIHHGRSHQLQJ7KHJDSHLV
related to the maximum particle size in the feed to the crusher by:
7KHQH[WVWHSLVWRGHÀQHWKHGHVLUHGSURGXFWFKDUDFWHULVWLFV%DVHGRQWKHUHGXFWLRQ
ratio and feed size F WKH GHVLUHG SURGXFW P is calculated. Reduction ratios for
FUXVKLQJDUHORZDQGYDU\DFFRUGLQJWRWKHFUXVKLQJVWDJH7KHIROORZLQJUDQJHVDUH
FRPPRQO\XVHGDGDSWHGIURP&KDYHVDQG3HUHV0XFNHUPDQQ
x SULPDU\FUXVKLQJ²W\SLFDOO\DURXQGEXWXSWRLQVSHFLÀFFDVHV
x VHFRQGDU\FUXVKLQJ²W\SLFDOO\EXWXSWRZKHQSURFHVVLQJVPDOOWKURXJKSXWV
x WHUWLDU\FUXVKLQJ²EHWZHHQDQG
x TXDWHUQDU\FUXVKLQJ²
$VFUXVKHUFDSDFLW\GHSHQGVRQRSHUDWLRQDOFRQGLWLRQVLWLVQHFHVVDU\WRGHÀQHWKH
FORVHG VLGH VHWWLQJ &66 9HQGRUV· WDEOHV DUH XVHG IRU WKLV SXUSRVH 7KH\ LQGLFDWH
FUXVKHG SURGXFW VL]H GLVWULEXWLRQV REWDLQHG IRU GLIIHUHQW &66 RIWHQ FDOOHG JUDGDWLRQ
curves). The crusher selection is based on capacity tables provided by vendors. These
FDSDFLWLHVDUHXVXDOO\IRUPDWHULDOVZLWKDEXONGHQVLW\RIWP3. The effective crusher
FDSDFLW\LVFDOFXODWHGE\FRUUHFWLQJWKHVWDQGDUGYDOXHV&RUUHFWLRQIDFWRUVIRUGHQVLW\
KDUGQHVV &UXVKLQJ :RUN ,QGH[ IHHG VL]H GLVWULEXWLRQ DQG PRLVWXUH DUH QRUPDOO\
provided by vendors according to crusher type.
Screens
7KH VFUHHQ W\SH LV VHOHFWHG DFFRUGLQJ WR WKH GXW\ LW ZLOO SHUIRUP $ JXLGHOLQH LV
SUHVHQWHGLQ7DEOH7KHVHOHFWLRQRIDVFUHHQVL]HLVEDVHGRQWKHUHTXLUHGVFUHHQLQJ
DUHD DQG WKH EHG WKLFNQHVV FRPSDWLEOH ZLWK WKH VFUHHQ DSHUWXUH WR JXDUDQWHH WKH
PDWHULDOVWUDWLÀFDWLRQ$OWKRXJKLWYDULHVZLWKWKHRUHGHQVLW\WKHPD[LPXPIHHGVL]H
YDOXHLVXVXDOO\IRXUWLPHVWKHVFUHHQDSHUWXUH,QWKHOLWHUDWXUHVHYHUDOHTXDWLRQVIRU
VFUHHQDUHDFDOFXODWLRQWKDWZHUHGHYHORSHGE\VFUHHQYHQGRUVPD\EHIRXQGWKHVHDUH
1. Assume a prescreened feed. Adjustment is required for direct feed with no prescreening.
TABLE 16.5
Guidelines for screen application (Metso Minerals, 2008).
Service Maximum Separation Applicable screentype Capacity
feed size size range
(mm) (mm) (m3/h)
Large material intermediate classification 400 100–200 Primary screens 300–1500
Medium material classification 250 50–100 Inclined and banana screens 100–1300
Fine material classification 200 2–50 Horizontal, inclined and banana screens 50–400
Extra-fine classification 25 0.2–6 High-frequency screens 10–40
Dewatering 13 0.5 Counter-slope screen with linear motion 100–250
ZKHUH
Qu is the amount of undersize in the feed (t/h)
Qspec LVWKHVSHFLÀFVFUHHQLQJFDSDFLW\WKP2)
Qbasic is the basic capacity (t/h/m2 GHWHUPLQHG JUDSKLFDOO\ EDVHG RQ WKH GHVLUHG
separation size
CFs are correction factors
6RPHH[DPSOHVRIIDFWRUVFRQVLGHUHGZKHQFDOFXODWLQJVFUHHQLQJDUHDVDUHSHUFHQW
RI RYHUVL]H IUDFWLRQV SHU FHQW RI PDWHULDO LQ WKH IHHG VPDOOHU WKDQ WKH VHSDUDWLRQ
VL]H GHFN SRVLWLRQ ZHW RU GU\ VFUHHQLQJ VROLGV GHQVLW\ VXUIDFH RSHQ DUHD VKDSH
RI VXUIDFH RSHQLQJ SDUWLFOH VKDSH VHSDUDWLRQ HIÀFLHQF\ VFUHHQ W\SH DQG PRLVWXUH
content.
7KLV WHFKQLTXH LPSOLHV WKDW WKH DFWLYH VFUHHQ DUHD LV LQLWLDOO\ FDOFXODWHG DQG WKH
VFUHHQ VL]H LV WKHQ FKRVHQ EDVHG RQ PLQLPXP VFUHHQ ZLGWK IRU DQ DGHTXDWH IHHG
OD\HU WKLFNQHVV 7KH VFUHHQ ZLGWK LV FDOFXODWHG XVLQJ WKH IROORZLQJ HTXDWLRQ 0HWVR
0LQHUDOV
Q
B= + 0.15
3.6 # v # d
ZKHUH
Q LVRYHUVL]HYROXPHWULFÁRZUDWHP3/h)
v is the material transport speed (m/s)
d LVWKHPDWHULDOOD\HUWKLFNQHVVPPZKLFKLVGHWHUPLQHGJUDSKLFDOO\DFFRUGLQJ
WRWKHYHQGRU·VUHFRPPHQGDWLRQV
7KH PDWHULDO WUDQVSRUW VSHHG LV XVXDOO\ GHÀQHG E\ YHQGRUV DFFRUGLQJ WR WKH VFUHHQ
W\SHDQGLWVVORSH&KDYHVDQG3HUHVVXJJHVWHGWKDWWKHPD[LPXPPDWHULDOOD\HU
WKLFNQHVVLVSURSRUWLRQDOWRWKHDSSDUHQWGHQVLW\DVSUHVHQWHGLQ7DEOH
TABLE 16.6
Maximum material layer thicknesses (Chaves and Peres, 2009).
Apparent density (t/m3) Maximum layer thickness (mm)
>1.6 4 × screen aperture
1.6–0.8 3 × screen aperture
<0.8 2.5 × screen aperture
TABLE 16.7
Typical parameters and operating conditions for designing a 22 MW semi-autogenous (SAG) mill.
Mill data Value Unit Comments
Diameter (inside shell) 12.2 m 40 ft
Liner thickness 0.15 m Suggest 0.10–0.15 m
Aspect ratio (L/D) 0.55 - Typically 0.5 to 0.6 for a high aspect mill
Effective grinding length (EGL) 7.5 m 22 ft
Feed cone angle 15 degree Typically 15
Discharge cone angle 15 degree Typically 15
Trunnion diameter 2.7 m
Fraction of critical speed 0.74 - Suggest 0.72 to 0.78 (0.80 maximum)
Ball volume nominal design 12 % v/v Suggest 10–15% for design
Ball volume maximum operating 16 % v/v Typically 0–20%
Ball volume structural design 20 % v/v Suggest 2–5% above maximum operating
Total filling nominal design 26 % v/v Suggest 26% for SAG, 28% for AG
Total filling maximum operating 35 % v/v Suggest 30–35%
Discharge slurry pulp density 70 % w/w Suggest 65% to 78%, typically 70%
Discharge mechanism Grate - Grate discharge for SAG or AG mill
Discharge screen Trommel - Trommel may be required for large flows and/or pebble cleaning
TABLE 16.8
Guidelines for rod / ball mill application (modified from Chaves and Peres, 2009).
Parameter Rod mills Ball mills
Length/diameter (L/D) ratio 1.4 to 1.6 1 to 2
Diameter (m/ft) <3.81/12.5 <8.53/28
Length (m/ft) >6.1/20 See note
Mill filling (% v/v) 35–40 28–45
Rotation speed (% of critical speed) 65–75 65–80
Mill power (kW) <2000 <22 000
Note: Ball mill length is normally limited by structural issues. The largest ball mill currently in operation (2015) has a diameter of 8.5 m (28 ft) and length of
13.4 m (44 ft).
0LOOOHQJWKLVLQFUHDVHGSURSRUWLRQDOO\WRWKHSRZHUGLIIHUHQFHWRDFKLHYHWKHUHTXLUHG
SRZHUXVLQJWKHIROORZLQJHTXDWLRQ
Pcorrected
Lcorrected # Ltable
Ptable
(TXDWLRQVUHODWLQJURGDQGEDOOPLOOSRZHUGUDZZLWKGLDPHWHUPLOOÀOOLQJDQGURWDWLRQ
VSHHGZHUHSURSRVHGE\5RZODQGDQG.MRV
0.1
Ball mills P = 4.879D0.3 _ 3.2 - 3Vp i f cs b 1 - l S kW/t of balls charged
2]9 - 10f csg + s
ZKHUH
P LVWKHSRZHUGUDZSHUPHWULFWRQRIPHGLDN:W
D is the mill diameter (m)
Vp LVWKHIUDFWLRQRIPLOOYROXPHÀOOHGZLWKJULQGLQJPHGLD
fcs is the fraction of critical speed
Ss is a correction factor (Ss is used only if the mill diameter is larger than 3.3 m and if
the maximum ball diameter (BPPLVVPDOOHUWKDQD
]B - 12.5Dg
Ss = 1.103
50.8
5RGPLOORSHUDWLRQFDQEHFODVVLÀHGDVÀQHFUXVKLQJRUFRDUVHJULQGLQJDVLWSURGXFHVD
relatively coarse product. Rod mills have limits on their shell length as rods tend to bend
if too long. The discharge of rod mill product occurs through openings in a discharge
WUXQQLRQRUWKURXJKSRUWVLQWKHSHULSKHU\RIWKHPLOOVKHOODVLOOXVWUDWHGLQ)LJXUH
The types of discharge are:
x FHQWUHSHULSKHUDOGLVFKDUJHZKLFKQRUPDOO\JLYHVPLQLPXPÀQHVFRQWHQW
x HQGSHULSKHUDOGLVFKDUJHZKLFKLVPDLQO\IRUGU\FRDUVHJULQGLQJ
x RYHUÁRZ GLVFKDUJH ZKLFK LV WKH PRVW ZLGHO\ XVHG DQG XVXDOO\ ZLWK D WURPPHO
screen attached to the trunnion.
%DOO PLOOV DUH DOVR FODVVLÀHG DFFRUGLQJ WR WZR W\SHV RI GLVFKDUJH PHFKDQLVP JUDWH
GLVFKDUJH RU RYHUÁRZ GLVFKDUJH $ PLOO ÀWWHG ZLWK WKH GLVFKDUJH JUDWH EHWZHHQ
A B C
FIG 16.4 – Rod and ball mill discharge arrangements (image courtesy Metso).
(A) Centre peripheral discharge; (B) end peripheral discharge; (C) overflow discharge.
WKH F\OLQGULFDO VKHOO DQG WKH GLVFKDUJH WUXQQLRQ XVXDOO\ UHVXOWV LQ OHVV RYHUJULQGLQJ
KRZHYHUWKLVGLVFKDUJHVDODUJHUIUDFWLRQRIFRDUVHSDUWLFOHV7KHUHIRUHWKLVW\SHRIEDOO
PLOOXVXDOO\RSHUDWHVLQFORVHGFLUFXLW7KHRYHUÁRZGLVFKDUJHEDOOPLOOLVVLPLODUWRWKH
URGPLOOZLWKDGYDQWDJHVRIEHLQJVLPSOHWRRSHUDWHDQGUHTXLULQJOHVVHQHUJ\WKDQD
grate discharge mill.
Classification
&ODVVLÀFDWLRQ LV WKH VHSDUDWLRQ RI SDUWLFOHV DFFRUGLQJ WR WKHLU VHWWOLQJ UDWH XVXDOO\ LQ
ZDWHU7ZRSURGXFWVDUHREWDLQHGRQHUHODWLYHO\FRDUVHUDQGWKHRWKHUUHODWLYHO\ÀQH
$JXLGHOLQHIRUVHOHFWLQJFODVVLÀFDWLRQHTXLSPHQWLVVKRZQLQ7DEOH
$VF\FORQHVDUHWKHPDLQFODVVLÀFDWLRQHTXLSPHQWXVHGLQPLQHUDOSURFHVVLQJSODQWV
WKLVVHFWLRQZLOOGHVFULEHWKHVHOHFWLRQDQGVL]LQJRIK\GURF\FORQHVRQO\
TABLE 16.9
Guidelines for classification (adapted from Kelly and Spottiswood, 1995).
Major classifier types Maximum feed size (mm) Power (kW) Capacity range (t/h)
Spiral, rake, drag 25 0.4–110 5–850
Log washer 100 7.5–60 40–450
Hydraulic bowl 12 2.2–15 5–225
Cone classifier 6 None 2–100
Hydrocyclone 12.5 (pumps) Up to 50 m3/min per hydrocyclone
Elutriator 7.5 (valves) 4–120
Hydrocyclones
$UWHUEXUQ SXEOLVKHG D VLPSOH PHWKRG IRU HVWLPDWLQJ K\GURF\FORQH
GLPHQVLRQVQXPEHURIK\GURF\FORQHVDQGRSHUDWLQJFRQGLWLRQV7KH$UWHUEXUQPHWKRG
LV DSSOLHG WR D ¶W\SLFDO K\GURF\FORQH· ZKLFK KDV WKH SURSHU JHRPHWULFDO UHODWLRQVKLS
EHWZHHQWKHK\GURF\FORQHGLDPHWHUDQGRWKHUGLPHQVLRQV
7KH K\GURF\FORQH GLDPHWHU LV EDVHG RQ WKH UHTXLUHG SURGXFW VL]H RYHUÁRZ
7KHSURGXFWVL]HLVQRUPDOO\GHÀQHGDVDJLYHQSHUFHQWSDVVLQJDVSHFLÀHGPLFURQ
VL]H ZKLFK FDQ EH UHODWHG WR WKH dc UHTXLUHG WR SURGXFH WKH VSHFLÀHG VHSDUDWLRQ
7DEOH
Three correction factors that take into account operating conditions are applied
to dc(application) to calculate dc(base). The dc(application LV WKH FXW VL]H UHTXLUHG
WR SURGXFH WKH VSHFLÀHG VHSDUDWLRQ ZKLOVW WKH dc(base LV WKH VL]H LQ PLFURQV WKDW D
¶VWDQGDUGK\GURF\FORQH·FDQDFKLHYHXQGHUWKHVHOHFWHGFRQGLWLRQV7KHHTXDWLRQDQG
FRUUHFWLRQIDFWRUVDUHDVGHVFULEHGLQWKHHTXDWLRQVIROORZLQJ
TABLE 16.10
Relationship of d50c to overflow size distribution (Arterburn, 1982).
Per cent passing a specified micron size Multiplier
98.8 0.54
95.0 0.73
90.0 0.91
80.0 1.25
70.0 1.67
60.0 2.08
50.0 2.78
d50c ^ applicationh
d50c ]baseg
C1 # C2 # C3
&RQFHQWUDWLRQRIVROLGVLQWKHIHHGVOXUU\
53 - V -1.43
C1 = b
53 l
ZKHUH
C is the correction factor
V is the per cent solids by volume of hydrocyclone feed
2. Pressure drop across the hydrocyclone:
C2 = 3.27 ]TPg-0.28
ZKHUH
C2 is the correction factor
ƦP is the pressure drop in kPa
3. 6SHFLÀFJUDYLW\RIWKHVROLGV
1.65 0.5
C3 = d g - g n
S L
ZKHUH
C3 is the correction factor
gs LVWKHVROLGVVSHFLÀFJUDYLW\
gL LVWKHOLTXLGVSHFLÀFJUDYLW\QRUPDOO\
The hydrocyclone diameter operated in the base conditions is then calculated using
WKHIROORZLQJUHODWLRQVKLS
7KHDSH[GLDPHWHULVGHWHUPLQHGEDVHGRQWKHXQGHUÁRZÁRZUDWHZKLOHWKHLQOHWDQG
YRUWH[VL]HVDUHVHOHFWHGEDVHGRQYHQGRUK\GURF\FORQHFRQÀJXUDWLRQV
7KH ZRUNHG H[DPSOH LQ 7DEOH ZDV SUHVHQWHG E\ $UWHUEXUQ LQ ,Q WKLV
H[DPSOHWKHK\GURF\FORQHVL]HDQGQXPEHURIK\GURF\FORQHVZHUHVHOHFWHGIRUDURGPLOO
EDOOPLOOFLUFXLWZKHUHQHZIHHGWRWKHURGPLOOZDVWKVROLGV%RWKPLOOGLVFKDUJHV
MRLQHG WRJHWKHU DW K\GURF\FORQH IHHG VXPS DQG ZHUH SXPSHG WR K\GURF\FORQHV
8QGHUÁRZEHFDPHEDOOPLOOIHHG7KHIROORZLQJLQIRUPDWLRQZDVSURYLGHG
x VSHFLÀFJUDYLW\RIVROLGV
x RYHUÁRZVL]HGLVWULEXWLRQ SHUFHQWSDVVLQJPP
x RYHUÁRZSHUFHQWVROLGVE\ZHLJKW SHUFHQW
x XQGHUÁRZSHUFHQWVROLGVE\ZHLJKW SHUFHQW
x HVWLPDWHGFLUFXODWLQJORDG SHUFHQW
7KHÀUVWVWHSZDVWRFDOFXODWHPDVVEDODQFHIURPWKHLQIRUPDWLRQSURYLGHG
1H[WWKHUHTXLUHGdcZDVFDOFXODWHGIRUWKHVSHFLÀHGRYHUÁRZ)URP7DEOHWKH
LQWHUSRODWHGPXOWLSOLHUDWSHUFHQWSDVVLQJZRXOGEH
,QLWLDOO\ WKH FRUUHFWLRQ IDFWRUV ZHUH FDOFXODWHG DQG WKHQ WKH K\GURF\FORQH GLDPHWHU
ZDVGHWHUPLQHGDVIROORZV
&RQFHQWUDWLRQRIVROLGVLQWKHIHHGVOXUU\
TABLE 16.11
Mass balance for the hydrocyclone worked example (adapted from Arterburn, 1982).
Parameter Feed Overflow Underflow
Solid rate (t/h) 812 250 562
Water rate (t/h) 562 375 187
Slurry rate (t/h) 1374 625 749
Per cent solids by weight (%) 59.1 40.0 75.0
Slurry density 1.632 1.355 1.966
Slurry volumetric rate (L/s) 234 128 106
3. 6SHFLÀFJUDYLW\RIWKHVROLGV
1.65 0.5 1.65 0.5
C3 = d g - g n = b 0.93
S L 2 .9 - 1.0 l =
)URP)LJXUHVHOHFWHGGLDPHWHULVLQFKHVFP
7KH QXPEHU RI XQLWV UHTXLUHG FDQ EH REWDLQHG XWLOLVLQJ WKH FKDUW SUHVHQWHG LQ
)LJXUH
7KHVWDQGDUGK\GURF\FORQHYROXPHWULFFDSDFLW\LVSUHVHQWHGLQ86JDOORQVSHUPLQXWH
LQ)LJXUH86JDOPLQ /V,QWKLVÀJXUHWKHYROXPHWULFÁRZUDWHIRU
DLQFKGLDPHWHUK\GURF\FORQHDWN3DZRXOGEH/V7KHUHIRUHWKHQXPEHURI
units is:
Q
N = t = 234 = 5.85
Qu 40
6L[K\GURF\FORQHVLQRSHUDWLRQZRXOGEHUHTXLUHG
&DOFXODWHDSH[VL]H
7KH SURSHU DSH[ VL]H LV REWDLQHG IURP DSH[ FDSDFLW\ FXUYHV VXFK DV WKH RQH
SUHVHQWHGLQ)LJXUH)RUVL[K\GURF\FORQHVWKHXQGHUÁRZYROXPHWULFÁRZSHU
XQLWZRXOGEH
QUF = 106 = 18 L/s
6
)URP)LJXUHHDFKDSH[VKRXOGEHFPöLQ
FIG 16.5 – Typical cyclone diameters (image courtesy Society of Mining, Metallurgy, and Exploration).
FIG 16.6 – Volumetric capacity for standard cyclones (image courtesy Society of Mining, Metallurgy, and Exploration).
FIG 16.7 – Apex capacity curves (image courtesy Society of Mining, Metallurgy, and Exploration).
TABLE 16.12
Typical value ranges of high-pressure grinding rolls parameters (Ausenco, 2014).
Parameter Symbol Typical value range
Specific throughput (ts/hm )3
mo 150–300
Throughput (t/h) M 50–3000
Roll diameter (m) D 0.95–2.6
Roll width (m) L 0.4–2.3
Roll peripheral speed (m/s) μ 0.95–2.6
Roll angular velocity (rev/min) 19–21
Operating gap (mm) s 20–80
Flake density (kg/L) ρg 2–3
Specific energy (kWh/t) 1.2–2.0
Motor power per roll (kW) 280–3300
Specific throughput
7KH VSHFLÀF WKURXJKSXW mo ) is a normalised parameter representing the capacity of an
+3*5XQLWZLWKDUROOGLDPHWHUDRIPDUROOZLGWKLRIPDQGDUROOFLUFXPIHUHQWLDO
VSHHGRIPV,WLVH[SUHVVHGE\WKHIROORZLQJHTXDWLRQYRQ6HHEDFK
mo M/ ]DLng
Angular velocity
7KH VSHFLÀF WKURXJKSXW mo LV REWDLQHG IURP ODERUDWRU\ RU SLORWVFDOH +3*5 WHVW
ZRUN%DVHGRQWKHYDOXHRI mo DQGWKHWKURXJKSXWUHTXLUHPHQWWKHUROOJHRPHWU\
FDQEHFKRVHQIURPVWDQGDUG+3*5YHQGRUVL]HV7KHUHTXLUHGUROOSHULSKHUDOVSHHG
is calculated and the resulting roll angular velocity determined. Roll geometry and
VSHHGDUHLWHUDWHGXQWLODQDQJXODUYHORFLW\LQWKHUDQJHRI²UHYPLQLVREWDLQHG
The angular velocity is calculated using the selected roll diameter and peripheral
VSHHGDVIROORZV
60n
Angular velocity =
rD
Operating gap
The operating gap is determined predominantly by the roll diameter and roll surface
WH[WXUHIRUH[DPSOHVPRRWK1L+DUGSURÀOHGVWXGGHGWKHSDUWLFOHVL]LQJRIWKHRUH
EHLQJ SURFHVVHG DQG PRVW LPSRUWDQWO\ ZKHWKHU WKH IHHG LV IXOOÀQHV RU WUXQFDWHG ²
WKDW LV ZLWK ÀQH PDWHULDO VFUHHQHG RXW LQ DQ XSVWUHDP RSHUDWLRQ 7KH PRVW FRPPRQ
roll surface used in hard rock applications comprises hard alloy studs in a cast steel
VXEVWUDWH:LWKWKLVVXUIDFHW\SLFDOYDOXHVIRUWKHRSHUDWLQJJDSDUH²SHUFHQWDQG
²SHUFHQWRIWKHUROOGLDPHWHUIRUIXOOÀQHVDQGWUXQFDWHGIHHGVUHVSHFWLYHO\
$VDFKHFNRQWKHUHTXLUHGFDSDFLW\DQGVHOHFWHGUROOJHRPHWU\DQGVSHHGWKHRSHUDWLQJ
JDS LV FDOFXODWHG XVLQJ WKH FRQWLQXLW\ HTXDWLRQ :KLWH ZLWK DQ +3*5 SURGXFW
ÁDNHGHQVLW\DVGHWHUPLQHGLQWHVWZRUNXVXDOO\LQWKHRUGHURISHUFHQWRIWKHRUH
SDUWLFOHVSHFLÀFJUDYLW\6*
M = 3.6Lsnt g
$YDOXHVLJQLÀFDQWO\RXWVLGHWKHUDQJHVQRWHGLQGLFDWHVDQHHGWRUHYLHZWKHVHOHFWLRQ
Edge effect
7KH¶HGJHHIIHFW·LVDWHUPXVHGWRGHVFULEHWKHLPSDLUHGFRPPLQXWLRQSHUIRUPDQFHLQ
WKH]RQHDWWKHHGJHRIWKHUROOVGXHWRWKHUHGXFHGFRPSUHVVLYHIRUFHVDWZRUNLQWKLV
]RQH7KH¶HGJH·IUDFWLRQLVFRUUHVSRQGLQJO\FRDUVHUWKDQWKHFHQWUHPDWHULDOGXHWRWKH
reduced energy input.
The edge effect is related to the operating gap (and therefore by extension to the roll
GLDPHWHU DQG WKH HGJH IUDFWLRQ DV D SURSRUWLRQ RI WRWDO SURGXFW LV GHWHUPLQHG DV
IROORZV
f = 2.4s
1000L
7KHHGJHPDWHULDOPD\EHKDQGOHGLQRQHRIVHYHUDOZD\VGHSHQGLQJRQWKHÁRZVKHHW
design:
x IRU VLQJOHSDVV RSHQFLUFXLW +3*5 RSHUDWLRQ LW VLPSO\ DFFRPSDQLHV WKH FHQWUH
material as a part of the total product
x IRUFORVHGFLUFXLWRSHUDWLRQWKHPDMRULW\RIWKHHGJHPDWHULDOZLOOUHSRUWDVVFUHHQ
RYHUVL]HDQGUHWXUQWR+3*5IHHG
x LQHGJHUHF\FOHPRGHWKHHGJHIUDFWLRQLVVHSDUDWHGIURPWKHFHQWUHSURGXFWXVLQJ
VSOLWWHUJDWHVLQWKHGLVFKDUJHFKXWHDQGUHWXUQHGWR+3*5IHHG
)RU RSHQFLUFXLW RSHUDWLRQ VLQJOHSDVV +3*5 WHVWLQJ LV VXIÀFLHQW WR GHWHUPLQH WKH
DSSOLFDEOHVSHFLÀFWKURXJKSXWYDOXHKRZHYHUWKHXVHRIFORVHGFLUFXLWRUHGJHUHF\FOH
PRGHDIIHFWVWKHVSHFLÀFWKURXJKSXWE\FKDQJLQJWKH+3*5IHHGSDUWLFOHVL]LQJDQG
WKHWHVWSURJUDPLQWKHVHFDVHVPXVWLQFOXGHORFNHGF\FOHWHVWVWRUHSOLFDWHWKHIXOOVFDOH
plant design.
Power requirements
:KHQ WKH +3*5 UHTXLUHG FDSDFLW\ VSHFLÀF WKURXJKSXW UROO JHRPHWU\ VSHHG DQG
RSHUDWLQJ SDUDPHWHUV DUH GHÀQHG WKH SRZHU UHTXLUHPHQW FDQ EH GHWHUPLQHG
7KHVSHFLÀFHQHUJ\LVREWDLQHGIURP+3*5WHVWZRUNXVLQJVLQJOHSDVVRUORFNHGF\FOH
WHVWV DV DSSURSULDWH 6SHFLÀF HQHUJ\ LV UHODWHG WR +3*5 QHZ IHHG LQ FRPPLQXWLRQ
energy calculations and to total feed (including any closed circuit or edge recycle) to
GHWHUPLQHPDFKLQHSRZHUUHTXLUHPHQWV7KHDEVRUEHGSRZHUFDOFXODWHGLVWKHQXVHG
IRUVHOHFWLRQRIDVXLWDEOHPRWRUVL]HWDNLQJLQWRDFFRXQWWKHPRWRUHIÀFLHQF\IDFWRUDQG
GULYHWUDLQORVVHVDQGWKHGHUDWLQJIDFWRUDSSOLFDEOHWRDFFRPPRGDWHWKHYDULDEOHVSHHG
GULYHIDFLOLW\WKDWLVQRUPDOO\XVHGLQPRVWPRGHUQ+3*5LQVWDOODWLRQV
PLANT LAYOUT
WROHDFKLQJRUÁRWDWLRQDLUDQGZDWHUVHUYLFHVFORVHWRWKHSODQWELJPRWRUVFORVHWR
WKHVZLWFKURRP
x .HHSHOHYDWLRQRIWKHHTXLSPHQWWRDZRUNDEOHPLQLPXP7KHHOHYDWLRQRIUXQRI
PLQHELQVPLOOVF\FORQHVÁRWDWLRQFHOOVDQGWKLFNHQHUVDUHNH\GHWHUPLQDQWV/DQH
et al
x Avoid use of dominating pipe racks or large platform areas.
x 8VHFRPPRQSODWIRUPVVWDLUVDQGSLSHDQGFDEOHODGGHUVXSSRUWV
x 3ODWHZRUNDQGOLQLQJVKRXOGEHNHSWOHDQIRULQVWDQFHRQO\SXWZHDUOLQHUVLQWKH
FKXWHDUHDVH[SRVHGWRZHDUDQGQRWDOOLQWHUQDOV
x 'HVLJQZLWKDÀWIRUSXUSRVHDWWLWXGHDVWKRXJKLWLV\RXUPRQH\\RXDUHVSHQGLQJ
6RPH¶UXOHVRIWKXPE·DSSO\VXFKDV
x WKHH[HFXWLRQVWUDWHJ\DQGSODQVKRXOGEHVLPSOHZLWK¶EDJJDJH·VLIWHGIURPWKHIDFWV
early and the agreed plan adopted and adhered to
x PLQLPLVLQJ WKH QXPEHU RI LQWHUIDFHV DFURVV DOO SDUWLHV DV HDFK LQWHUIDFH UHTXLUHV
PDQDJLQJDQGLVDSRWHQWLDOVRXUFHRILQHIÀFLHQWFRPPXQLFDWLRQV
x LQYHVWLQJLQSURYHQDQGUHOLDEOHHTXLSPHQWDVLWJHQHUDOO\VDYHVPRQH\LQWKHORQJHU
term
x UHGXFLQJ IRRWSULQW DV FDSLWDO DQG RSHUDWLQJ FRVWV WHQG WR LQFUHDVH SURSRUWLRQDOO\
ZLWKIRRWSULQWDQGSODQWFRPSOH[LW\
End-to-end configuration
7KHIHDWXUHVRIWKLVFRQÀJXUDWLRQDUHDVIROORZV
x UHTXLUHVWZRRYHUKHDGFUDQHVGHSHQGLQJRQWKHPLOOVSHFLÀFV
x DFFHVV LV GLIÀFXOW IRU VHUYLFLQJ WKH SXPSV ZKLFK DUH ORFDWHG DW WKH FHQWUH RI WKH
building
x QHHGV PRUH UHOLQLQJ ÁRRU DUHD EHFDXVH 6$* DQG EDOO PLOOV KDYH LQGHSHQGHQW
UHOLQLQJÁRRUV
x K\GURF\FORQHXQGHUÁRZFDQQRWEHHDVLO\UHWXUQHGWRWKH6$*PLOOLIQHFHVVDU\
Side-by-side configuration
7KHIHDWXUHVRIWKLVFRQÀJXUDWLRQDUHDVIROORZV
x typically produces a smaller building footprint and consolidated overhead crane
span
x DEOHWREHVHUYLFHGZLWKRQHFUDQHLQPRVWDSSOLFDWLRQV
x HQDEOHVHDVLHUDFFHVVIRUVHUYLFLQJWKHSXPSVZKLFKDUHORFDWHGDWWKHSHULSKHU\RI
the building
x KDV D FRPPRQ UHOLQLQJ ÁRRU IRU ERWK 6$* DQG EDOO PLOOV ZKLFK FDQ UHGXFH WKH
EXLOGLQJDUHDKHQFHDVPDOOHUIRRWSULQW
FIG 16.8 – Semi-autogenous grinding and ball mills: end-to-end (top) and side-by-side (bottom) configurations
(Dufour et al, 2011; published with the permission of the Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum (CIM)).
WZRZD\GLVWULEXWLRQGHYLFHVKRZHYHUWKHIHHGWRWKH+3*5IHHGELQLVDV\PPHWULF
DQGWKHQDWXUDOVHJUHJDWLRQRIWKHIUHHWUDMHFWRU\ZLOOFDXVHDFRDUVHÀQHELDVQRWRQO\
EHWZHHQPRGXOHVEXWDOVRDFURVVWKHUROOZLGWKRIHDFK+3*5XQLWFDXVLQJUROOVNHZ
DQGXQHYHQZHDU
6XLWDEOHVXUJHELQVDUHSURYLGHGDKHDGRIWKHVHFRQGDU\FUXVKHUV+3*5VDQG+3*5
ÀQHVFUHHQVEXWQRWDKHDGRIWKHFRQHFUXVKHUFRDUVHVFUHHQV7KHOLNHO\RSHUDWLRQRI
WKHVHFRQGDU\FUXVKHUVLQVWDUW²VWRSPRGH²DVLVW\SLFDOLQDQ\VWDJHFUXVKLQJSODQW²
ZRXOGPHDQWKDWWKHWKHVHVFUHHQVZRXOGRSHUDWHZLWKDF\FOLFIHHGOHDGLQJWRLQHIÀFLHQW
operation and possible overloading.
7KHOD\RXWLQFOXGHVVXEVWDQWLDOVWRUDJHEHWZHHQVHFRQGDU\FUXVKLQJDQG+3*5EXW
QRQHEHWZHHQ+3*5DQGPLOOLQJWKHVPDOOVXUJHELQVQRWSURYLGLQJDQ\PHDVXUDEOH
storage per se7KLVUHVXOWVLQWKH+3*5VÀQHVFUHHQVPLOOLQJDQGHQWLUHGRZQVWUHDP
SODQWDUUDQJHGLQDQXQLQWHUUXSWHGWUDLQ7KLVFORVHOLQNLQJRIWKHFRPPLQXWLRQVWHSV
LQ SDUWLFXODU PHDQV WKDW LPSDLUHG SODQW XWLOLVDWLRQ IDFWRUV ZRXOG DSSO\ 7KH UHGXFHG
DYDLODELOLW\ GXH WR WKH +3*5 PHDQV WKDW ODUJHU HTXLSPHQW ZRXOG EH QHHGHG IRU D
QRPLQDWHGDQQXDOLVHGWKURXJKSXWRUWKDWUHGXFHGWKURXJKSXWZRXOGRFFXUXVLQJWKH
VDPHHTXLSPHQWVL]HV
3. +3*5
ÀQHVFUHHQLQJDQGPLOOLQJ
The disadvantage is that operations have been decentralised. The major ore storage
IDFLOLW\ KDV EHHQ UHORFDWHG IURP XSVWUHDP RI +3*5 WR XSVWUHDP RI ÀQH VFUHHQLQJ WR
PD[LPLVHPLOOLQJXWLOLVDWLRQIDFWRUV7KHIUHHWUDMHFWRU\VSOLWRIIHHGLQWRWKHVHFRQGDU\
crusher and coarse screen feed bins is considered acceptable:
x VHFRQGDU\FUXVKHUIHHGLVWUXQFDWHGWKDWLVÀQHVIUHHDQGVHJUHJDWLRQLVOHVVRIDQ
LVVXHWKDQZLWKDIXOOÀQHVIHHG
x WKHFRDUVHVFUHHQLQJVHSDUDWLRQHIÀFLHQF\LVQRWFULWLFDODQGWKHH[SHFWHGVHJUHJDWLRQ
DFURVVWKHZLGWKRIHDFKVFUHHQLVFRQVLGHUHGWROHUDEOH
<HWWKLVLVQRWWKHFDVHIRUWKH+3*5DQGÀQHVFUHHQLQJGXWLHV
x 8QVHJUHJDWHG IHHG DFURVV WKH +3*5 UROO ZLGWK DV QRWHG SUHYLRXVO\ LV HVVHQWLDO
KRZHYHUWKLVOD\RXWZRXOGIDLOWRDFKLHYHWKHREMHFWLYHDVWKHRXWHUHGJHVRIWKHUROOV
UHFHLYHSUHGRPLQDQWO\FRDUVHPDWHULDODQGWKHLQQHUHGJHVWKHÀQHV
x 7KHIRXUÀQHVFUHHQVSURSRVHGZRXOGUHFHLYHELDVHGIHHGZKLOHWKHRXWHUWZRVFUHHQV
ZRXOGUHFHLYHFRDUVHUIHHGDQGWKHLQQHURQHVWKHÀQHV7KHVHVFUHHQVDUHEHGGHSWK
OLPLWHGDQGLWFRXOGEHH[SHFWHGWKDWVXFKDELDVZRXOGOHDGWRRYHUORDGLQJRIWKH
outer screens.
6RPHRIWKHVHGHÀFLHQFLHVDUHDGGUHVVHGLQ/D\RXW&
,QWKLVDUUDQJHPHQWZLWKDKLJKHUWKURXJKSXWWKDQWKHSUHYLRXVYHUVLRQVDOOJRRG
SUDFWLFH PDWHULDOVKDQGOLQJ UHTXLUHPHQWV DUH PHW ZKLOH DOVR DFKLHYLQJ D VLJQLÀFDQW
UHGXFWLRQLQFRQYH\RUQXPEHUV7KLVUHSUHVHQWVDVLJQLÀFDQWRSHUDELOLW\DQGPDLQWHQDQFH
advantage.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Arterburn,5$The Sizing of Hydrocyclones.UHEV(QJLQHHUV0HQOR3DUN
Arterburn, 5 $ 7KH VL]LQJ DQG VHOHFWLRQ RI K\GURF\FORQHV LQ Design and Installation of
Comminution CircuitVHGV$/0XODUDQG*9-HUJHQVHQFKDSWHUSS²6RFLHW\IRU
0LQLQJ0HWDOOXUJ\DQG([SORUDWLRQ/LWWOHWRQ
Ausenco,$XVJULQGSURJUDPPHLQWHUQDOQRWHV
Austin, / $ PLOO SRZHU HTXDWLRQ IRU 6$* PLOOV Minerals and Metallurgical Processing
SS²
Barratt,'-$QXSGDWHRQWHVWLQJVFDOHXSDQGVL]LQJHTXLSPHQWIRUDXWRJHQRXVDQGVHPL
DXWRJHQRXV JULQGLQJ FLUFXLWV LQ Proceedings Advances in Autogenous and Semi-Autogenous
Grinding Technology: SAG 1989HGV$/0XODUDQG*($JDUSS²8QLYHUVLW\RI%ULWLVK
&ROXPELD9DQFRXYHU
Barratt, ' - DQG $OODQ 0 - 7HVWLQJ IRU DXWRJHQRXV DQG VHPLDXWRJHQRXV JULQGLQJ D
GHVLJQHU·VSRLQWRIYLHZMinerals and Metallurgical Processing²
Barratt,'-DQG%URGLH07KH¶WHQW·GLDJUDPZKDWLWPHDQVLQProceedings International
Autogenous and Semi-autogenous Grinding Technology (SAG 2001) HGV0DMRUet al&DQDGLDQ
,QVWLWXWHRI0LQLQJ0HWDOOXUJ\DQG3HWUROHXP0RQWUHDO
Chaves,$3DQG3HUHV$(&Teoria e Prática do Tratamento de MinériosYROXPH6LJQXVHGLWRUD
Dufour,/0F9H\.3HUNLQV65RODQGL/DQG<RXQJ(6$*DQGEDOOPLOOFLUFXLWOD\RXW
DQGGHVLJQLQProceedings International Conference on Autogenous and Semiautogenous Grinding
Technology (SAG 2011)HGV.0DMRU%&)OLQWRII%.OHLQDQG.0F/HRG&DQDGLDQ,QVWLWXWH
RI0LQLQJ0HWDOOXUJ\DQG3HWUROHXP0RQWUHDO
Kelly,(*DQG6SRWWLVZRRG'-Introduction to Mineral ProcessingS-RKQ:LOH\DQG6RQV
Lane,*%ULQGOH\6*UHHQ6DQG0F/HRG''HVLJQDQGHQJLQHHULQJRIÁRWDWLRQFLUFXLWV
LQ$XVWUDOLDLQProceedings Centenary of Flotation SymposiumSS²7KH$XVWUDODVLDQ
,QVWLWXWHRI0LQLQJDQG0HWDOOXUJ\0HOERXUQH
Lane,*'DNLQ3DQG(OZLQ'&RVWHIIHFWLYHFRQFHQWUDWRUGHVLJQLQProceedings Metallurgical
Plant Design and Operating Strategies (MetPlant) 2011SS²7KH$XVWUDODVLDQ,QVWLWXWHRI
0LQLQJDQG0HWDOOXUJ\0HOERXUQH
Lane, * )RJJLDWWR % DQG %XHQR 0 3 3RZHUEDVHG FRPPLQXWLRQ FDOFXODWLRQV XVLQJ
$XVJULQGLQProceedings Tenth International Mineral Processing Conference*HFDPLQ
Loveday,%.3UHGLFWLRQRIDXWRJHQRXVPLOOLQJIURPSLORWSODQWWHVWVLQProceedings 11th
Commonwealth Mining and Metallurgical Congress HG 0 - -RQHV ,QVWLWXWLRQ RI 0LQLQJ DQG
0HWDOOXUJ\
McIvor, 5 ( $ PDWHULDO EDODQFH FDOFXODWLRQ SURFHGXUH IRU JULQGLQJ FLUFXLW K\GURF\FORQH
VHOHFWLRQCIM BulletinSS²
McLean,(-:H·UHPHWDOOXUJLVWVQRWPDJLFLDQVLQProceedings Metallurgical Plant Design
and Operating Strategies (MetPlant) 2011SS²7KH$XVWUDODVLDQ,QVWLWXWHRI0LQLQJDQG
0HWDOOXUJ\0HOERXUQH
Metso Minerals,Crushing and Screening HandbookWKLUGHGLWLRQ
APPENDIX 16.1
Example of comminution circuit design criteria (Ausenco, 2015).
COMPANY NAME
PROJECT NAME
Project Number: PROCESS DESIGN CRITERIA
Revision:
Date:
000 GENERAL
Primary Crushing
Operating days per year d/y 365 1
Shifts per day 2 1
Hours per shift h 12 1
Operational availability, annual % 68.5 1
Operating hours per year h/y 6,000 1
Comminution Characteristics
Unconfined compressive strength - maximum for design MPa 190 2
Bond Crushing Work Index kWh/t 8.5 2
Bond Impact Work Index, design kWh/t 15.0 2
Bond Rod Mill Work Index, design kWh/t 16.5 2
Bond Ball Mill Work Index, design kWh/t 17.5 2
JK/SMC parameter A 80 2
JK/SMC parameter b 0.8 2
Drop Weight Index 4.5 2
Abrasion Index, range - 0.06 - 0.30 1
Abrasion Index, for design - 0.30 8
020 CRUSHING
Crushing Capacity
Throughput - average t/h 670 1
Throughput - maximum for design t/h 775 8
ROM Ore
ROM ore maximum lump size, ) 100 mm 1,000 3
ROM ore typical lump size, ) 65 mm 210 3
Load capacity of haul truck to ROM pad t 92 1
Wheel loader to dump hopper, type - TBA 9
ROM dump pocket live capacity, number of truck loads - 2.0 4
ROM bin grizzly aperture mm x mm 800 4
Primary Crusher
Product size 3 99 mm 220 5
Product size 3 80 mm 130 5
Crusher closed side setting mm 150 5
Maximum capacity at closed side setting t/h 440 8
Secondary Crusher
Product size 3 99 mm 125 5
Product size 3 80 mm 80 5
Crusher closed side setting mm 70 5
Maximum capacity at closed side setting t/h 340 8
Reclaim Feeders
Number of feeders - 2 1
Design capacity, % total SAG feed % 75 8
030 GRINDING
Type of circuit
Single stage SAG mill, closed circuit 8
(provision future pebble recycle crusher)
Circuit Capacity
Grinding circuit throughput - nominal t/h 495 1
Grinding circuit throughput - maximum t/h 530 8
SAG Mill
SAG mill feed ) 100 mm 150 4
SAG mill feed ) 80 mm 80 5
SAG mill discharge slurry density % w/w 72 8
Cyclones
Cyclone underflow pulp density % w/w 75 4
Cyclone overflow pulp density % w/w 42 4
Code Source
1. Client supplied data
2. Testwork - metallurgical, process
3. Consultant report, data
4. Operating practice, industry standard
5. Vendor data
6. Engineering handbook, Regulatory Standards, Codes
7. Environmental
8. Recommended by Engineer
9. Not available. To be provided by Client, test work, others - as available.
Glossary
The following are terms common to comminution that may be found in the text, but this
list is by no means exhaustive. Further information can be obtained from sources such
as infomine.com or insidemetals.com and industry brochures such as that produced by
Russell Mineral Equipment or JKSimMet. Many terms may have different meanings
when used in non-mineral processing contexts.
80 per cent This indicates the mesh size of a milling screen of which 80 per cent of the
passing size – particles in a sample will pass through. F80 refers to a feed size distribution
F80 or P80 while P80 refers to product size distribution. See particle size distribution.
apex 7KHFRQHDWWKHEDVHRIDF\FORQHFODVVLÀHUWKURXJKZKLFKFRDUVHVROLGVDUH
discharged in accordance with its minimum cross-section.
autogenous A mill where all the grinding is done by the impact of the ore on itself,
grinding (AG) mill rather than introduced grinding media such as steel balls, pellets or rods.
ball milling A method of grinding a substance with or without liquid using media
such as balls or pebbles. It typically takes place in a rotating cylinder or
conical mill.
Bond Work Index An ore hardness index developed by Fred Bond in the 1950s used to
predict the breakage energy required for a certain size reduction. It can
be conducted using traditional rod mill (BRMWi) or ball mill (BBMWi)
circuits closed with hydrocyclones.
cement A substance that binds sedimentary rock to form a solid mass. Common
cements include carbonates, silica and certain iron oxides.
charge The steel balls and ore in a mill at a given time. It may also be the balls and
rocks remaining once the mill has stopped.
circulating load Material returned to a ball mill for further grinding because it is either
oversized or fails to meet the conditions for the next treatment stage.
classification The process of taking particles too small to be screened and using their
VL]HVKDSHRUGHQVLW\FKDUDFWHULVWLFVWRFDXVHGLIIHUHQWLDOVHWWOLQJLQDÁXLG
medium such as air or water.
closed circuit Part of the machine product is recycled to the machine for further
processing because the original processing was incomplete. In a
comminution process this usually refers to the coarse fraction from the
FODVVLÀHUSee open circuit.
coal Rock that contains more than 50 per cent carbonaceous material (weight-
wise) and more than 70 per cent in volume, including moisture. It is
formed from the hardening and condensing of living plant remains
similar to those found in peat.
coking coal Coal with a high carbon content and minimal impurities that can be
converted into coke for fuel. Generally, the best coking coals are 80 per cent
to 90 per cent carbon.
concentrator An industrial plant where ore is divided into values and rejects, or an
instrument in such a plant where the ores are mechanically cleaned using
either water, air or gravity.
cone crusher A machine that breaks rock by compression between a gyrating cone and
a stationary inverted cone.
crushing Reducing the size of ore into relatively coarse particles by stamps, crushers
or rolls. Crushers can be primary, secondary, tertiary and quaternary, with
primary crushers handling larger and coarser materials, and quaternary
FUXVKHUVKDQGOLQJWKHÀQHUSDUWLFOHVSee Symons crusher.
drilling A comminution process where narrow diameter holes in rock are formed
by high-speed cutting tools.
entrainment 7KHSURFHVVLQEHQHÀFLDWLRQE\ZKLFKSDUWLFOHVHQWHUDSURGXFWZLWKÁXLG
(such as air or water) without being subject to the mechanisms involved
LQUHGXFWLRQFODVVLÀFDWLRQRUFRQFHQWUDWLRQ
fines Small particles for grinding where size depends on its context; for instance,
1 mm is regarded as small for blasting and crushing, while 100 microns is
regarded as small for grinding.
grain A single piece of mineral that may form part of a particle or larger body
of material.
grindability The ease in which a substance may be ground, assessed by its reduced
size and the power used.
grinding aid A chemical agent added to the charge in a ball mill or rod mill to assist the
grinding process.
grizzly A steel grate placed over a chute or pass to stop large pieces of rock from
passing.
gyratory crusher A machine that compresses and breaks ore using an offset crushing cone
DQGDÀ[HGFUXVKLQJWKURDW
hydraulic A tank that sorts ore pulp using a stream of hydraulic water at a steadily
classifier rising rate. Heavier, coarser particles fall and are discharged at the bottom,
while lighter particles rise up and are removed.
hydrocyclone A device in which particles are suspended in water and centrifugal forces
classifier are applied; coarse fragments are discharged from the vessel’s apex, while
ÀQHUSDUWLFOHVDUHGLVFKDUJHGZLWKWKHZDWHU
jaw crusher $ FUXVKLQJ PDFKLQH FRQVLVWLQJ RI D À[HG SODWH DQG DQ RVFLOODWLQJ SODWH
forming a tapered-jaw effect.
liberated mineral 0LQHUDOV WKDW KDYH KDG WKHLU VXUIDFHV H[SRVHG WR D VXIÀFLHQW GHJUHH WR
allow them to be affected by surface chemistry or other mineral recovery
processes.
mill A processing facility where ore is cleaned and concentrated before being
VHQWWRDUHÀQHU\RUVPHOWHU
mill availability The amount of time over a year when there is no hindrance to a mill’s
production. It can refer to a grinding mill’s availability but is more likely
to be about a concentrator plant’s availability.
milling In a power plant milling is grinding. In an ore plant it may refer to grinding
or to the entire circuit.
mineralogy A branch of geology that deals in the study of minerals, including how they
DUHIRUPHGWKHLUSK\VLFDOSURSHUWLHVDQGXVHDQGKRZWKH\DUHFODVVLÀHG
open circuit When the entire product from a mineral processing machine moves to
the next downstream process rather than being recycled for further
processing. See closed circuit.
optimisation +DYLQJDVHWRIFRQGLWLRQVWRDFKLHYHPD[LPXPRSHUDWLRQDOHIÀFLHQF\
overgrinding Grinding an ore to a smaller particle size than necessary to liberate the
mineral. Not only does this waste energy, but can result in minerals being
GLIÀFXOWWRSURFHVV
recovery The amount of value gained from an ore, which in turn measures the
PLOO·VHIÀFLHQF\
reduction ratio Calculates the ratio of F80 to P80, thereby determining how size reduction
has taken place in processing.
rod milling Grinding that employs rods of a small diameter that run the length of the
mill.
rolls crusher A machine comprising one or two rollers made of steel or iron that are
placed at a certain distance apart so that thick substances are crushed as
they pass through.
run-of-mine ore Untreated ore straight from the mine before undergoing processing of
any sort.
scats The particles ejected from a tumbling mill, which may be ore or broken
grinding media.
screens :LUHPHVKSDUWLWLRQVZLWKRSHQLQJVRIDVSHFLÀFVL]HGHVLJQHGIRUJUDGLQJ
particles.
semi-autogenous A combination of AG milling (using rock grinding media) and ball milling,
grinding (SAG) with the aim of improving breakage rates.
mill
sizer A crusher that uses a multistage system to break the rock down to the
required size. It then separates the undersized rock from the oversized
rock, the latter of which is fed back into the system.
slime 2UHWKDWLVSURFHVVHGWRVXFKDÀQHSRZGHUDVWREHVXVSHQGHGLQZDWHU
forming a kind of thin mud.
stirred milling *ULQGLQJ WKDW WDNHV SODFH ZKHUH WKH F\OLQGHU LV À[HG DQG WKH PHGLD LV
moved by stirrers. These mills may be vertical or horizontal.
Symons crusher $ PRGLÀHG J\UDWRU\ FUXVKHU ZLWK D GRZQZDUG ÁDULQJ ERZO ZLWKLQ
which features a conical crushing head. The main gyrating shaft is driven
by bevel gears. There are two types of Symons crushers: the Standard
Symons is designed to crush coarser than the Shorthead Symons.
texture The physical appearance of a rock, including the size and form of its
mineral grains.
tumbling mill A horizontal cylindrical mill in which contents are tumbled and particles
are broken while it rotates.
vortex finder $ WXEH SURMHFWLQJ LQWR D K\GURF\FORQH·V YRUWH[ WKURXJK ZKLFK ÀQHU RU
lighter pulp is removed.
Index
abrasion resistance, 44
abrasiveness, 44
actuators, 230
advanced process control (APC) systems, 241–3, 259–61, 263
DLUFODVVLÀHUV159–64
conical, 160
dynamic, 161–4
static, 159–61
zigzag, 160–1
DLUMHWPLOODQGFODVVLÀHUZKHHOV110–12
Airmet Dusttrak II 8530, 36
$WULWDPLOOVFRPELQHGKDPPHUDQGDWWULWLRQPLOOV103–4
AudioMill
PLOOVRXQGFRQWUROZLWK262
system, 260–1, 263
Ausgrind, 209–12, 272–6
autogenous/semi-autogenous grinding mills, 68–71, 281–2
mill liners, 135
automated mineralogy systems (mineral liberation), 18–19
averaging pitot, 229
EDOOFKDUJHVL]HLQVHPLDXWRJHQRXVJULQGLQJPLOOV68–9
ball mill, 61
for cement, 62–4
circuit, 200, 202–3, 204, 274–6, 277, 278
and circuit design, 282–4
circuit layout, 293–7
ÀWWLQJ219–23
open-circuit single-stage, 200, 203
for ores, 66–8
mill liners, 135–6
VSHFLÀFHQHUJ\204
EDOOPLOO²K\GURF\FORQHFLUFXLWÀWWLQJH[DPSOHIRU218–26
ball milling, single-stage, 173, 175–6
ball/tube mills for coal, 65–6
EHDWHUZKHHOPLOOV104–6
EHGEUHDNDJHFUXVKHUV85–7
%ODLQHPHWKRG41
%RQG%DOO0LOO:RUN,QGH[%%0:L5, 6, 46, 50, 52, 54, 55
%RQG)UHG&KHVWHU44–5, 198
%RQGJULQGDELOLWLHVSRZHUFDOFXODWLRQVXVLQJ197–212
Bond grindability test, 44–6
%RQG5RG0LOO:RUN,QGH[%50:L46, 272
%RQG:RUN,QGH[WHVWUHVXOWV272
%RQG:RUN,QGH[YDOXHV57–8
bore core testing (coal), 179–80
EUHDNDJHGHÀQLWLRQV43–4
EUHDNDJHPHFKDQLVPV7
%UXQDXHU²(PPHWW²7HOOHUWKHRU\40–1
EXONODERUDWRU\WHFKQLTXHVPLQHUDOOLEHUDWLRQ17
burner management system (BMS), 185
comminution, 1–10
background, 2–3
EUHDNDJHPHFKDQLVPV7
FODVVLÀFDWLRQPHFKDQLVPV7–8
FRQWH[W1–2
design criteria, 269
energy calculations, 272
fundamentals, 3–6
grindability, 6
K\GUDXOLFDQGSQHXPDWLFVHSDUDWLRQ8
introduction, 1
PDFKLQHV3, 8–10
principles, 4–5
screening, 7–8
size separation in comminution processes, 145–6
in stirred mills, 108–13
WKHRU\5–6
comminution circuits
cement clinker, 172–7
cement plants, control of, 188–9
coal preparation plants, control of, 187–8
ÁRWDWLRQRIORZJUDGHFRSSHUVXOÀGHRUHV172
ores, 167–72
SRO\PHWDOOLFVXOÀGHÁRWDWLRQ171–2
comminution circuits, modelling, 215–26
EDOOPLOOÀWWLQJ219–23
HIÀFLHQF\FXUYHPRGHOIRUFODVVLÀHUV217–18
ÀWWLQJH[DPSOHIRUEDOOPLOO²K\GURF\FORQHFLUFXLW218–26
K\GURF\FORQHÀWWLQJ223–6
SHUIHFWPL[LQJEDOOPLOOPRGHO215–17
comminution for coal preparation plants, 177–84
comminution processes, modelling mineral liberation in, 19–21
KHXULVWLFPRGHOV19
PDWKHPDWLFDOPRGHOV19–21
Compañía Minera Antamina 170–1
competence, 43–4
FRPSUHVVLRQPDFKLQHV79–98
EHGEUHDNDJHFUXVKHUV85–7
FRQYHQWLRQDOFRQHFUXVKHUV82–4
energy used in different circuits, 96–7
J\UDWRU\FUXVKHU79–80, 81–2
KLJKFDSDFLW\FUXVKLQJFLUFXLWV84–5
KLJKSUHVVXUHJULQGLQJUROOV+3*587, 90–3
+RURPLOOV95–6
MDZFUXVKHU80–2
HIÀFLHQF\FXUYHPRGHOIRUFODVVLÀHUV217–18
electrical actuators, 230
electron microscopy, 38–9
energy-intensive stirred agitator (EiSA) mill, 115–16
IHHGJUDGDWLRQFRQWDLQLQJH[FHVVLYHÀQHV200, 204
ÀQHVFUHHQV153–4
ÀQLVKJULQGLQJXVLQJKLJKSUHVVXUHJULQGLQJUROOV176
ÀQLVKJULQGLQJXVLQJDYHUWLFDOUROOHUPLOO177
ÁRZVKHHWRSWLRQVFLUFXLWGHVLJQ269–71
)/6PLGWKJ\UDWRU\FUXVKHU79–80, 82
)ULWVFK$QDO\VHWWHPRGHOV, 33
KDPPHUPLOOV101–3
+DUGJURYH*ULQGDELOLW\,QGH[+*,WHVW46–7
+DUGJURYH5DOSK46–7
KDUGQHVV43
+DYHUDQG%RHFNHU&3$38
+LDF5R\FRSDUWLFOHFRXQWHU35
KLJKFDSDFLW\FUXVKLQJFLUFXLWV84–5
KLJKFKURPLXPZKLWHLURQPLOOOLQHUV127–8
KLJKIUHTXHQF\VFUHHQV
DQGFRPSDULQJK\GURF\FORQHVLQFORVHGJULQGLQJFLUFXLWV157–9
KLJKSUHVVXUHJULQGLQJUROOV+3*587, 90–3, 274–5, 277, 289–91, 293–7
KLJKVSHHGLPSDFWPLOOV99–106
$WULWDPLOOVFRPELQHGKDPPHUDQGDWWULWLRQPLOOV103–4
EHDWHUZKHHOPLOOV104–6
KDPPHUPLOOV101–3
YHUWLFDOVKDIWLPSDFWFUXVKHUV99–101
+,*PLOO114–15
KRUL]RQWDOVWLUUHGPLOOV118–20
KRUL]RQWDOVWLUUHGZHW$+0PLOO121
+RURPLOOV95–6
+RVRNDZD$OSLQHGU\YHUWLFDOVWLUUHG$75PLOO123–4
+RVRNDZD$OSLQHÀQHJULQGLQJPLOOV120–4
KRUL]RQWDOVWLUUHGZHW$+0PLOO121
ZHWYHUWLFDOVWLUUHG$15PLOO121–3
K\EULGJULQGLQJFHPHQW173–5
K\GUDXOLFDQGSQHXPDWLFVHSDUDWLRQ8
K\GURF\FORQHFLUFXLWÀWWLQJH[DPSOHIRU218–26
K\GURF\FORQHÀWWLQJ223–5
K\GURF\FORQHPHWKRGV34–5
K\GURF\FORQHV34, 150–3, 284–8
FRPSDULQJKLJKIUHTXHQF\VFUHHQVLQFORVHGJULQGLQJFLUFXLWV157–9
IsaMill, 118–20
MDZFUXVKHU80–2
-.'URS:HLJKW7HVW-.':748–51, 52, 206, 272
-XOLXV.UXWWVFKQLWW0LQHUDO5HVHDUFK&HQWUH-.05&206–7, 272
0DF3KHUVRQ$5206
PDJQHWLFÁRZPHWHU229
0DOYHUQ,QVWUXPHQWV0RUSKRORJL37–8
Malvern Instruments MS2000, 32
mass balancing, 191–7
Matec Applied Sciences (MAS), 37
metallurgist, process control, 239–40
0HWVRFRQHFUXVKHU82
0HWVR3URFHVV7HFKQRORJ\DQG,QQRYDWLRQ37,168
Micromeritics Saturn Digisizer, 33
0LFURPHULWLFV6HGL*UDSK34
PLOOKHDGVWXPEOLQJPLOOV75
FDOFXODWLRQRIDFWXDODQGFRUUHFWHGSDUWLWLRQFRHIÀFLHQWV195–6
FDOFXODWLRQRIPLOOSRZHU205–6
FODVVLÀHUFDOFXODWLRQV²PDVVEDODQFLQJDQGFLUFXODWLRQORDG191–7
FRPSDULVRQRIWKHDFWXDODQGLGHDOHIÀFLHQF\FXUYH196–7
SRZHUFDOFXODWLRQVXVLQJ%RQGJULQGDELOLWLHV197–212
PLOOLQJV\VWHPFRQWUROZLWKLQ186–7
PLOOLQJV\VWHPVSRZHUSODQW181–4
MillMapper, 139–40
Mine to Mill, 168–9
mineral liberation, 11–22
automated mineralogy systems, 18–19
EXONODERUDWRU\WHFKQLTXHV17
GHÀQLWLRQ11
during breakage, 12
KHXULVWLFPRGHOV19
KRZLWKDSSHQV14–17
OLEHUDWLRQVHSDUDWLRQÁRZVKHHWVKRZLQJPXOWLSOHVWDJHV16
PDWKHPDWLFDOPRGHOV19–21
measuring, 17–19
modelling in comminution processes, 19–21
optical microscopy, 17
in separation processes, 21–2
terminology, 12
;UD\WRPRJUDSK\19
ZK\LWLVQHFHVVDU\12–14
mineral sizers, 88–9
PL[LQJEDOOPLOOPRGHOSHUIHFWFRPPLQXWLRQFLUFXLWV215–17
0RUUHOO·VPHWKRG208–9
3DQ$XVW/LPLWHG246–56
particle counting, 35–6
SDUWLFOHPHDVXUHPHQWWHFKQLTXHV25–41
electron microscopy, 38–9
K\GURF\FORQHPHWKRGV34–5
laser diffraction particle size analysis, 31–3
particle counting, 35–6
SKRWRPLFURVFRS\RSWLFDO37–8
sampling, 25–30
VHGLPHQWDWLRQVHGLJUDSKDQGFROXPQVHWWOLQJ33–4
surface area analysis, 40–1
VXUIDFHFKDUJHWHFKQLTXHV36–7
ZHWGU\VLHYLQJ30–1
X-ray diffraction, 39–40
SHDUOLWLFFKURPLXPPRO\EGHQXP&U0RVWHHOPLOOOLQHUV127
SHUIHFWPL[LQJEDOOPLOOPRGHOFRPPLQXWLRQFLUFXLWV215–17
SKRWRPLFURVFRS\RSWLFDO37–8
EDVLFWHFKQLTXH37
manufacturers, 37–8
3KX.KDPPLQH/DRVJULQGLQJFLUFXLWFRQWURO245, 246–56
control rooms, 252–3
FUXVKLQJ253–4
HTXLSPHQW251–2
ÁHHWFRQWURODQGUHSRUWLQJ253
grinding control, 254–6
introduction, 246–7
operational control design, 251
RSHUDWLRQDOV\VWHPVRYHUYLHZ253
operations management strategy, 250–6
SURFHVVFRQWUROVWUDWHJ\DQGDSSURDFK247–50
reliability, 252
system design, 250–1
plant layout, 291–7
ball mill circuit layout, 293–7
KLJKSUHVVXUHJULQGLQJUROOV293–7
RYHUYLHZDQGREMHFWLYHV291–2
SAB/SABC, 292–3
pneumatic separation, 8
Polysius double rotator mills, 62
SRZHUFDOFXODWLRQVXVLQJ%RQGJULQGDELOLWLHV197–212
HIÀFLHQF\IDFWRUV199–200, 201–2
PLOOSRZHUFDOFXODWLRQVXVLQJWKH%RQGPHWKRGDQGHIÀFLHQF\IDFWRUV200–12
SRZHUSODQWPLOOLQJV\VWHPV181–4
SRZHUVWDWLRQVFRQWURORIFRDOPLOOVLQ184–7
SULPDU\FUXVKHUV79–82
J\UDWRU\FUXVKHU79–80, 81–2
MDZFUXVKHU80–2
process control, 227–43
advanced process control (APC) systems, 241–3, 259–61, 263
control elements, 229–30
FRQWURORIDFUXVKHU238–9
grinding circuit control, 234–7
PHDVXUHPHQWDQGFRQWUROFRVWV²¶UXOHRIWKXPE·233–4
metallurgist, role of, 239–40
model-based control, 243
objectives, 239
SURFHVVFRQWUROWHFKQLTXHVDQGVNLOOV240–1
process measurement, 228–9
UHVSRQVHRIWKH6$*PLOOWRFKDQJHLQIHHGUDWH237–8
UXOHEDVHGH[SHUWV\VWHPVIX]]\DQGFULVS241–3
VWUDWHJ\DQGDSSURDFK3KX.KDPPLQH/DRV247–50
WHFKQLTXHVDQGVNLOOV240–1
transmission, 230–1
process control systems, 231–3
distributed control system (DCS), 232
1HZPRQW$KDIRJROGPLQH*KDQD245, 246, 257–63
3KX.KDPPLQH/DRV245, 246–56
SURJUDPPDEOHORJLFFRQWUROOHU3/&233
process development and circuit design, 265–6
SURFHVVÁRZGLDJUDP3)'227
process measurement, 228–9
ÁRZPHDVXUHPHQW229
SURJUDPPDEOHORJLFFRQWUROOHU3/&233
proportional-integral-derivative (PID) control, 188
UDNHDQGVSLUDOFODVVLÀHUV149
5HÁX[&ODVVLÀHU150
representative subsampling, 27–30
FKXWHVDPSOLQJ28
FRQLQJDQGTXDUWHULQJ29
URWDU\ULIÁHU29–30
scoop sampling, 28
spear sampling, 28–9
5HWVFK&DPVL]HU37
5HWVFK+RULED/$33
5KRGD[FUXVKHU85–6
rod mill circuit, 200, 202–3
rod mill in open-circuit, 200, 201–2
rod mills, 71–2
and circuit design, 282–4
mill liners, 136
vertical roller mills (VRMs), 93–5
roller mills, 89–90
UROOVFUXVKHU87
rotary breakers for coal, 71–3
URWDU\ULIÁHU29–30
5XPSI+DQV108
scoop sampling, 28
screening, 7–8, 154–5
dry, 156–7
screens
FKDUDFWHULVWLFV156–7
and circuit design, 279–81
evolution of, 154–5
ÀQH153–4
KLJKIUHTXHQF\155–6
KLJKIUHTXHQF\FRPSDUHGZLWKK\GURF\FORQHV157–9
Stack Sizer, 155–6
vibrating, 154–7
ZLUHPHVK155
see also sieving
scrubbers, 73–4
6HGL*UDSK34
VHGLPHQWDWLRQVHGLJUDSKDQGFROXPQVHWWOLQJ33–4
basic principles, 33
0LFURPHULWLFV6HGL*UDSK34
VHPLDXWRJHQRXVJULQGLQJPLOOV6$*PLOOV1, 54, 68–71, 281–2
EDOOFKDUJH68–9
ball size, 69
FKDUDFWHULVWLFV69–71
circuits, 200, 204
mill liners, 127, 135
optimised blasting, 169–70
UHVSRQVHWRFKDQJHIHHGUDWH237–8
VSHFLÀFHQHUJ\205
VHPLÀQLVKJULQGLQJ175
separation processes, mineral liberation in, 21–2
settling column, 34
VKHOOVWXPEOLQJPLOOV76
sieve bends, 153–4
sieving
VWDLQOHVVVWHHOYHUVXVEUDVVYHUVXVQ\ORQPHVKVLHYHV31
WHFKQLTXH301
ZHWGU\30–1
see also screens
single-stage ball milling (cement), 173, 175–6
size separation in comminution processes, 145–6
SMC Test, 51–3, 276
60&ZRUNHGH[DPSOHVFLUFXLWGHVLJQ276–8
spear sampling, 28–9
SPI test, 53–4
VSLUDOFODVVLÀHUV149
7K\VVHQ.UXSS'RXEOH5RWDWRU62
WRZHUPLOOV113
transmission, 230–1
trommels, 147–9
trunnions (tumbling mills), 76
tumbling mills, 61–76, 107
autogenous/semi-autogenous grinding mills, 68–71
ball mills for cement, 62–4
ball mills for ores, 66–8
ball/tube mills for coal, 65–6
building large, 75–6
components, 75–6
grinding balls, 74
rod mills, 71–2
role of liners in, 125–6
rotary breakers for coal, 71–3
scrubbers, 73–4
Tyler, W S, 155
valves, 230
vertical roller mills (VRMs), 93–5
YHUWLFDOVKDIWLPSDFWFUXVKHUV99–101
vertical stirred mills, 113–17
energy-intensive stirred agitator (EiSA) mill, 115–16
+,*PLOO114–15
+RVRNDZD$OSLQHGU\YHUWLFDOVWLUUHG$75PLOO123–4
stirred media detritor, 116–17
WRZHUPLOOV113
Vertimill, 113–14
ZHWYHUWLFDOVWLUUHG$15PLOO121–3
Vertimill, 113–14
vibrating screens, 154–7
9LEURFRQHFUXVKHU86–7
VisioRock
IHHGHUVFRQWUROZLWK262
system, 260, 263
YRUWH[ÁRZPHWHU229
Warman Cyclosizer, 35
ZDVWHEUHDNDJH4
ZDWHUIHHGUDWHFRQWUROORRSV235–6
ZHWGU\VLHYLQJ30–1