Notes For Audit by Chapters
Notes For Audit by Chapters
-Assurance Standards:
Assertion: A statement about some aspect of a subject matter. (triangle- three party)
-Unwritten — direct reporting engagements
-Written assertions— attest engagements: Audits and reviews
Ch 3: Auditors’ Ethical and Legal Responsibilities CH4: Reports on Audited Financial Statements
3-1, 3-3, DC 3-3, DC 3-4, DC 3-6 4-1, 4-2, 4-7, 4-12, 4-13, 4-15, 4-16, 4-22,
Auditors have three areas of responsibility to society.
1)Moral Responsibilities
2)Professional Responsibilities -Forming an audit opinion is the ultimate goal of audits
3)Legal Responsibilities • Unmodified / Unqualified or Clean Opinion: Required by securities regulations
• Modified opinion
– Due to GAAP violations that affect fair presentation OR
Ethical dilemma is a problem that arises when a reason to act in a certain – Due to scope limitations that impair auditor’s ability to fully comply with GAAS
way is offset by a reason to not act in that way. -Qualified opinion “except for…” or
-Denial of opinion “I am unable to express an opinion….”.
Critical thinking can help identify and resolve ethical dilemmas.
– A reservation paragraph is added after the scope paragraph to describe the
departure from GAAP. (major variations on standard audit report)
Ethical behaviour behavior that produces the greatest good. – “Except for” opinion with reference to reservation paragraph.
– Introductory and scope paragraphs are unchanged.
Professional judgment in auditing is essentially critical thinking on
accounting issues and the evidence related to them. This reasoning • Disclaimer of opinion no opinion because it was impossible to get the audit
should be documented. evidence required
– Identifying the crucial issues • Adverse audit report: Departures from GAAP in the statements are:
– Gathering information on all the significant - “super-material”
assertions - pervasive, affecting numerous accounts and financial statement
– Identifying possible alternative courses of action relationships.
– Evaluating the alternative courses of actions - Reservation paragraph added describing the situation
– Deciding on the best course of action - Adverse opinion “…statements do not present fairly...
6) Inquiry: Involves the collection of oral evidence from the client and Recalculation / reperformance (test of • Auditor’s calculations or performance
independent third parties. Audit standards now put more reliance ctrl) (Substantive) (dual purpose)
on inquiry as a means to understanding strategy and risks and
controls. Analysis • Data interrelationships
For example:
Inquire about frequency of bank reconciliation procedures Inquiry (test of ctrl) (dual purpose) • Statements by auditee personnel
(understanding controls for risk assessment).
Dual-purpose audit procedures: procedures that are designed to meet 1) Inspection: Looking at records, documents, or assets having physical substance.
the purpose of a control test and the purpose of a substantive test. • Reliable evidence for existence, supports valuation.
• Documents can be prepared by independent outside parties
Business Information Sources and Methods • Documents can also be prepared by the entity under audit.
For continuing audits, information about the client is available in the For example:
permanent files.
• Read the terms of the lease agreement for the lessee (understanding business)
The auditor will interview client management and directors
• Test counts of a sample of physical inventory quantities on hand at year-end
to learn of any changes in the business or industry.
(substantive verification of account balance).
The auditor will assess relevance of prior period
information for the current audit.
Vouching: Information is selected from an account or other summary of information and the
1)Obtaining Information from Observation and Research Databases: auditor goes back through the control system to find the source documentation. Vouching
can study and review research databases, published materials, guides, supports existence. (backward)
and other reference materials on the industry and the client (exhibit 8-
2) Tracing: Auditor selects source documents and proceeds (forward) through the control system
to the final recording of the transaction. Tracing supports completeness.
2) Obtaining Information from Internal Auditors and Experts: Internal
auditors can assist by providing information about systems and Scanning: Does not produce direct evidence, but can raise questions. Computers can be used to
controls. scan electronic data files. Scanning can be used to reduce sampling risk by scanning the items
not selected.
Sufficient Appropriate Evidence in Auditing For example: (same example above)
- Accounting records are evidence but are not sufficient appropriate
evidence for an audit opinion. 2) Observation: Looking at the application of policy or procedures by others.
-Corroborating evidence needs to be obtained.
Reliable evidence as to performance at the time of observation.
1)Appropriateness of Evidence Produces a general awareness of events.
evidence must be relevant and reliable. For example:
Relevant: audit evidence must relate to one of the management Observe petty cash control procedures (understanding controls and control testing).
assertions (exhibit 8-3) Observe auditee’s inventory-counting procedures (understanding controls and
Reliable: reliability of audit evidence depends on nature and source. control testing).
(Exhibit 8-4)
The following hierarchy of evidence can be used to judge reliability 3) External Confirmation: Consists of (written) enquiry to verify accounting records.
Most reliable Confirmation with independent parties for a variety of transactions and balances.
Physical inspection Confirmation can produce evidence regarding existence, ownership, valuation and
Confirmation cut-off.
External documentation For example:
Recalculation / reperformance Obtain written confirmation of accounts receivable balance from a sample of
Less reliable customers (substantive verification of account balance).
External-internal documentation Obtain written confirmation of loan amount, interest, collateral, and payment dates
Internal documentation (with good internal controls) from lender (substantive verification of account balance).
Observation
Analytical procedures with specific data Confirmation procedures:
– Confirmations should be printed on the client’s letterhead, signed by a client
officer.
Least reliable
– Auditor needs to ensure that the address on the confirmation is legitimate.
Internal documentation (if poor internal controls)
– The recipient should be able to provide the information.
Inquiry
– The auditor must mail the confirmations.
Broad analytical procedures
– Responses must be returned directly to the auditor.
Positive confirmations: request a reply in all cases. Follow-up is required for all exceptions
2) Sufficiency of Evidence: Test of sufficiency is whether you can
persuade someone else that you have collected enough evidence to
reported, and for all unreturned confirmations.
support your conclusion. In order to reduce audit risk, only detection Negative confirmations: request a reply only where information is incorrect.
risk can be affected by the auditor, so more evidence is required to Only exceptions need to be followed up.
support an opinion.
Audit planning:
The planning memorandum is a summarization of the preliminary
analytical review and the materiality and risk assessment with
specific directions about the effect on the audit.
-All planning becomes the basis for the audit program. The audit
program specifies procedures the auditor will use to guide the
work of inherent control and control risk assessment and to
obtain sufficient competent evidence as a basis for the audit
report.
4. Consider whether the engagement requires special attention or involves unusual risks
1) Understanding the auditee business
5. For new audits, communicate with the previous auditor
2) Risk Assessment: Risk of material misstatement in the financial statements is
used to describe the possibility that business or environmental risks have resulted
Determining Auditability
in the financial statements not being a fair representation of the company’s
-Whether the financial statements presented in accordance with GAAP.
economic realities.
-Whether management understands its responsibility for preparing the financial statements,
The auditor’s risk assessments will identify the key risk areas in the
and for designing and implementing adequate internal controls.
audit.
-Management’s commitment to providing written representations or other scope limitations
The audit team will emphasize those areas
Auditee Retention
3) Materiality refers to a monetary amount that auditors believe financial
– The public accounting firm will have more first-hand experience with
statement users would find significant, or material, to their decision making.
the auditee.
– Used for planning how to perform the audit
– Annual retention reviews take into account changes for the auditee.
– Used for concluding whether financial statements are materially
misstated
Communication Between Predecessor and Successor Auditors
4)Documentation of the planning process: Record all deliberations and decisions Auditor’s Risk From Accepting An Audit Engagement
in planning in the document called Overall Audit Strategy – How widely distributed are the audited financial statements?
Overall Audit Strategy: – How strong is the financial condition of the auditee?
-The preliminary planning activities are the basis for the overall audit strategy. – How trustworthy is auditee’s management?
-The audit strategy guides development of the detailed audit plan, which details – How complex is the financial reporting required?
the nature, extent and timing of the audit procedures. – How knowledgeable are the people using the financial statements
-The auditor shall establish an overall audit strategy that sets the scope, timing, likely to be?
and direction of the audit, and that guides the development of the audit plan.
Independent Financial Stat Audit Process: Engagement Letter: When a new audit client is accepted an engagement letter must be
obtained.
– The engagement letter forms the contract for the audit.
Steps: Elements Standards require the auditor and management to agree on the terms of the
audit engagement.
Pre-engagement activities – A new engagement letter should be obtained every year of a
continuing audit.
Risk
Preliminary audit planning: Risk Identification
Assessment
Risk assessment procedures to plan audit
Staff Assignment
Time Budget
Internal control documentation and testing
Understanding the Auditee’s Business, Environment and Risks
Response to
– It helps to assess the risk that financial statements might contain
Assessed Sampling decisions
material misstatements. Used to establish and overall audit strategy, design the audit plan and
Risks
Substantive procedures audit programs. (exhibit 5-3)
Concluding Review audit findings Business environment risks: related to Industry, regulatory, economy-related, and other
& Reporting external factors
Form opinion and issue report Business operational risks: related to Strategy and related business processes, investments,
financing, and performance measures
Communications among audit team members throughout the process Analytical Procedures Requirements
Documentation of the audit decisions and findings Compare current-year account balances with one or more comparable periods.
Revisions to risk assessments and planned responses if appropriate due to Compare current-year account balances and financial relationships with similar information
knowledge obtained during audit process for the auditee’s industry.
Communications with those charged with the auditee’s governance and its Compare current-year account balances with the company’s anticipated results.
management Evaluate the relationships of current-year balances to other current-year balances for
conformity to predictable patterns.
Independent Audit Engagement Characteristics Study the relationships of current-year balances to relevant nonfinancial information.
it is important for the auditors to understand what kind of entity is being audited, Preliminary Analytical Procedures
who the people are who are charged with governance of the entity, the Review of accounting misstatements discovered in prior years
stakeholders to whom they are accountable, and the client’s reasons for wanting Conversations with the auditee personnel
an audit. Review of corporate charter and bylaws (or partnership agreement)
Acceptance Decision: Pre-engagement Activities Review of contracts, agreements, and legal proceedings
Risk management: Reading and study of the minutes of meetings
Auditors try to reduce the risk (probability of something going wrong) by carefully Horizontal analysis: examination of numbers and ratios across two or more years.
managing the engagement. Vertical analysis: examination of amounts expressed each year as proportions of a
Quality management:
base (sales or total assets).
Auditors manage audit in accordance with quality control standards.
Materiality Levels for Audit Planning
Materiality is one of the first important judgments the auditor must make, since it affects every
other planning, examination, and reporting decision.
-Materiality is the largest amount of uncorrected misstatement that might exist in financial
statements that still fairly present the company’s financial position and results of operations.
Performance materiality: leave room for error and reduce the probability that the total
misstatement exceeds materiality.
Materiality Judgment Criteria: Small misstatements may be material in some cases.
For example:
masks a change in earnings or other trends,
hides a failure to meet analysts’ consensus expectations for the auditee,
changes a loss into net income or vice versa,
concerns a segment of the business that is considered significant,
affects the auditee’s compliance with regulatory requirements,
involves concealment of an unlawful transaction or fraud, or
has the effect of increasing management compensation
Quantitative guidelines:
5% of income from continuing operations,
5% of net income before bonus,
½ to 2% of revenues or expenses for non-for profit entities,
½ to 1% of net asset value for the mutual fund industry, or
1% of revenue for the real estate industry.
Business Process Analysis illegal act (CAS 240 and 250) is an act of non-compliance with the laws and regulations of
Business process analysis deepens the auditor’s understanding of the client’s operations.
the country or countries in which the auditee organization operates. Auditors are concerned
It may also highlight risks and possible note disclosures.
Business processes should also be designed to ensure compliance with laws and regulations. with suspicions of illegal acts that can directly or ultimately affect financial statements.
-More involvement in e-commerce and more complex information systems create new business risks.
-The auditor needs to understand how e-commerce and IT integrate into the business processes.
The auditors’ knowledge of the business and enquiries of management help to
identify laws and regulations that, if violated and not reported, could result in
Financial Performance Analysis material misstatements.
Examine significant accounting policies
In addition, auditors should enquire and obtain representations about
Interrelationship between ratios
Any evidence of earnings manipulation awareness and disclosure of possibly illegal acts.
Consider quality of earnings Material, possibly illegal, acts should be communicated to the audit committee
Communication with the Audit Committee and appropriate levels of management.
o Impact on earnings of implementing changes in accounting policies
o Effect of significant accounting policies in controversial areas
Fraud auditing is defined as a proactive approach to detect financial frauds using accounting
o Estimates, judgments, and uncertainties
o Existence of acceptable alternative policies and methods records and information, analytical relationships, and an awareness of fraud perpetration
o Unusual transactions and concealment schemes.
o Timing of transactions that affect the recognition of revenues or avoid
recognition of expenses
Financial Statement Assertions and Audit Objectives Auditor responsibility to consider Fraud:
Assertions are claims management makes in financial statements. The auditor shall make inquiries of management regarding:
Managements accounting system produces a trial balance. a) Management’s assessment of the risk that the financial statements may be
Management arranges the trial balance in financial statements, making assertions. materially misstated due to fraud, including the nature, extent and frequency
Auditors take the assertions as focal points for audit work.
of such assessments;
The practical audit objectives are to obtain and evaluate evidence about assertions made by
management in financial statements. b) Management’s process for identifying and responding to the risks of fraud in
Five principal assertions cover the claims made by management in the financial statements: the entity, including any specific risks of fraud that management has identified
Existence (occurrence) or that have been brought to its attention, or classes of transactions, account
Completeness balances, or disclosures for which a risk of fraud is likely to exist;
Ownership (rights and obligations) c) Management’s communication, if any, to those charged with governance
Valuation (measurement and allocation)
regarding its processes for identifying and responding to the risks of fraud in
Presentation (classification and disclosure)
Existence: the entity; and
-assets, liabilities and equities actually exist, d) Management’s communication, if any, to employees regarding its views on
-that revenue and expense transactions actually occurred as of a proper date, and business practices and ethical behaviour.
-there are cut-off considerations to existence: no transactions from the next period should be
recorded at the statement date How does the auditor justify that the fraud risk is low?
Completeness:
If the auditors cannot justify that the fraud risk is low, then they need to raise the matter
-No items belonging to the financial statement have been missed.
-There are cut-off considerations: with the audit committee.
All transactions from the period are actually recorded in the period. Perform analytical procedures of revenues, make enquiries, and scan for
Ownership: Establish with evidence that amounts reported as assets of the company represent unusual entries (especially at year-end),
property rights and the amounts reported as liabilities represent obligations. The audit team should have brainstorming sessions to identify and share
Valuation: Determine whether proper values have been assigned to assets, liabilities, equities, information on fraud risk factors during the audit.
revenues, and expenses.
Identify biases in management accounting estimates and be able to understand
Presentation: Determine whether the accounting principles are properly selected and applied and
whether disclosures are adequate the business rationale of transactions.
Immaterial errors are supposed to be reported to management at least one level above the
Misstatement at the Assertion Level: They are the focal point for all audit procedures. people involved.
The auditor uses the assertion to ask “what could go wrong?” and how likely it is to happen
Evidence produced by each procedure must relate to one or more of the specific assertions.
The auditors should inform the audit committee of all suspected fraud and illegal acts,
except those that are “clearly inconsequential.” Those involving senior management are
Audit Risk Assessment: never inconsequential.
Audit risk: The probability that an auditor will fail to express a reservation that financial statements are
materially misstated is audit risk.
The “Fraud Triangle”
Audit risk is greater if there is poor planning or poor execution of the audit.
Audit risk is inversely proportionate to risk of getting sued. Fraud Incentive
Audit risk is dependent on user reliance. Fraud Opportunity
Fraud Rationalization
Auditing by process: For fraud to occur, all three types of factors need to be present.
To simplify the audit plan, auditors typically group the accounts into several accounting processes.
(1) revenues and collection
(2) acquisition and expenditure
(3) production and conversion
(4) finance and investment
The purpose of using business processes is to group together related accounts by transactions that
normally affect them.