Rubric for Assessing Projects/ Outputs

Dimensions Level 5 Level 4 Level 3 Level 2 Level 1

(94-100 pts) (88-93 pts) (81-87 pts) (17-80 pts) (74 below pts)

1. Content Addresses the topic Addresses the topic very Addresses the topic Addresses the topic Addresses the topic
excellently; full satisfactorily less than satisfactorily; partial fairly; limited coverage poorly; limited the
coverage of content full coverage of content; coverage of content of content coverage of content;
content is focused on essentials are not dealt
the basics with

2. Organization Organizes ideas logically Organizes ideas Organizes ideas a little Organizes ideas very Organizes ideas with no
and precisely somewhat logically and logically lacking in little logically and logic nor precision
precisely precision lacking in precision

3. Mechanics Observes correct Observes correct Observes correct Observes correct Never observes correct
spelling, punctuation, spelling, punctuation, spelling, punctuation, spelling, punctuation, spelling, punctuation,
grammar and sentence grammar and sentence grammar and sentence grammar and sentence grammar and sentence
structure always structure often structure sometimes structure rarely structure

4. Package and Is very creative that all Is creative that some Is not so creative that a Is not creative that few Is not creative that all
Presentation entries are displayed entries are displayed few entries are entries are displayed entries are displayed
Creativity in lay- artistically artistically displayed artistically ordinarily ordinarily
out of entries

5. Neatness of Presents the project Presents the project Presents the project Manifests little evidence Manifest no evidence of
work very neatly in all entries neatly in all entries neatly in few entries of neatness in some neatness in all entries
entries
 Rubric for Assessing Participation
(English)

Possible Points Criteria

90-100 Clear language. Demonstrate a complete understanding of subject matter. Language is precise and varied. Speak in
clear, correct English appropriate to the solution

80-89 Clear language. Demonstrate a good understanding of the key concepts, but explanation could be more detailed.
Adequate vocabulary is used fairly.

70-79 Adequate oral skills but sometimes indicate confused thinking about a concept.

60-69 Language vocabulary is marginal. Inadequate and incomplete explanation, indicating poor understanding of the subject
matter.
 Rubric for Assessing Assignments

A. Content

5 81 – 100% of the task required is correctly answered with supporting evidences/ explanations
4 61 – 80% of the task required is correctly answered with supporting evidences/ explanations
3 41 – 60% of the task required is correctly answered with supporting evidences/ explanations
2 21 – 40% of the task required is correctly answered with supporting evidences/ explanations
1 1 – 20% of the task required is correctly answered with supporting evidences/ explanations
0 No correct answer or no task was accomplished
B. Organization

5 Answers/ ideas are clearly stated and logical sequence

4 Answer/ ideas are clearly but with not more than 25% errors in sequencing
3 Up to 75% of the answers/ ideas are clearly stated and with not more than 50% errors in sequencing
2 Up to 50% of the answer/ ideas are clearly stated and with not more than 75% errors in sequencing
1 Less than 50% of the answer/ ideas are clearly stated and with major errors in sequencing
0 No answers at all
C. Sources of Information
(Optional)
5 With 9 – 10 sources of information
4 With 7 - 8sources of information
3 With 6 – 5 sources of information
2 With 4 - 3sources of information
1 With 2- 1 sources of information
0 None at all
 Rubric for Assessing Projects/ Outputs

Levels Points % Indicators

Exemplary 6 93 – 100 Work/ project is exceptional and impressive. A distinctive and sophisticated application of
knowledge and skills are evident

Strong 5 87 – 92 Work/ project exceeds the standard; thorough and effective application of knowledge and skills
are evident.

Proficient 4 83 – 86 Work/ project meets the standard; acceptable and it displays the application of essential
knowledge and skills.

Developing 3 80 – 82 Work/ project does not yet meet the standard; show basic, but inconsistent application of
knowledge and skills; work needs further development.

Emerging 2 76 – 79 Work/ project shows partial application of knowledge and skills; lacks depth or incomplete and
needs considerable development; errors and omissions are present.

Learning 1 75 BELOW No work presented.

 Rubric for Assessing Participation
5 90-100 4 85-89 3 80-84 2 75-79 1 74 BELOW
Dimensions Pts. % Pts. % Pts. % Pts. % Pts. %

Quality of Inputs Knowledge shared is Knowledge shared is Knowledge shared is Knowledge shared is Attempted to share
accurate and broad accurate but limited somewhat accurate inaccurate and limited knowledge
and limited

Attitude Manifested Participates Participates Participates Participates hesitantly Participates only when
voluntarily, actively, voluntarily, actively, somewhat actively with no enthusiasm compelled to do so
enthusiastically in enthusiastically in and enthusiastically and with little
activities with activities with little with little consideration for the
consideration for the consideration for the consideration for the feelings/ opinions of
feelings/ opinions of feelings/ opinions of feelings/ opinions of others
others others others

Task Performance Performs tasks (as Performs tasks (as Performs tasks (as Performs tasks ( as Attempted to perform
leader/ member) leader/ member) with leader/ member) with leader/ member) with task
without errors minor errors some errors many errors
 Rubric for Assessing Participation
5 90-100 4 85-89 3 80-84 2 75-79 1 74 BELOW
Criteria Pts. % Pts. % Pts. % Pts. % Pts. %

Understanding 5 correct answers 4 correct answers 2 – 3 correct answers 0 - 1correct answers

Concept within the time limit within the time limit within the time limit within the time limit

5 correct answers 3 – 4 correct answers 1 – 2 correct answers No correct answers

beyond the time limit beyond the time limit beyond the time limit beyond the time limit

Teamwork and All members of the 4 out of the 5 3 out of the 5 2 out of the 5 Only the leader
Cooperation group participated members of the group members of the group members of the group performed the task
actively participated actively participated actively participated actively
 Rubric for Assessing Performance
(Mathematics)

Points % Description of Responses

1. Uses correct and work is presented in logical order, expressed clearly and with correct answer.
5 90-100%
2. Correct solution but used other problem solving strategy and correct answer.

1. Has presented strategies in solving the problem but has not obtained the final correct answer.
4 85-89%
2. Complete and correct method of solution but wrong answer.

3 80-84% The work is presented systematically but with errors in computation leading to incorrect answer.

2 75-79% Suggest good mathematical thinking but with incomplete solution and no answer.

1 70-74% No solution/ wrong solution but with correct answer.

0 69 BELOW No attempt.
 Rubric sa Pagtataya ng Partisipasyon
4 3 2 1
Dimensyon Napakahusay Mahusay Katamtaman Nangangailangang
Pagpapabuti
A. Pagkakaisa (teamwork) Aktibong nakilahok ang Aktibong nakilahok ang Aktibong nakilahok ang Walang namsid na
Paano nagtrabaho ng lahat ng kasapi nakararami sa mga kasapi ilan sa mga kasapi aktibong pakikilahok sa
sama-sama ang mga mga kasapi
kasapi ng pangkat? Nanatiling nakatuon sa Nanatiling nakatuon sa Nanatiling nakatuon sa
gawain ang lahat ng kasapi gawain ang nakararami sa gawain ang ilan sa mga Hindi nakatuon sa Gawain
hanggang sa matapos ito mga kasapi hanggang sa kasapi hanggang sa ang lahat ng kasapi
matapos ito matapos ito
Mataas ang antas ng
pagkakaisa Nakapagpamalas ng Mababa ang antas nga Walang pagkakaisang
pagkakaisa ang pangkat ipinamalas na pagkakaisa ipinamalas
B. Aktibong Pagkatuto Nakahanap ng 3 o mahigit Nakahanap ng 2 paraan Nakahanap ng 1 lamang Hindi natapos ang Gawain
(Active Learning) pang paraan upang upang matapos ang na paraan upang matapos at walang nahanap na
matapos ang gawain o Gawain o malutas ang ang Gawain o malutas ang solusyon sa suliranin
malutas ang suliranin suliranin suliranin
C. Pakikipagtalastasan
Gaano kahusay ang Gumamit ng 4 o higit pa sa Gumamit ng 3 paraan ng Gumamit lamang ng 2 Hindi nagging maayos ang
pakikipagtalastasan ng mga mga inaasahang paraan ng pakikipagtalastasan paraan ng paraan ng
sumusunod na aspeto: pakikipagtalastasan pakikipagtalastasan pakikipagtalastasan ng
1. pagtatanong mga kasapi ng pangkat
2. pagtatalakay sa mga
kaisipan
3. pakikinig
4. pagbibigay ng
konstruktibong puna
5. paghahalaw ng mga
natuklasan at
natutuhan
 Rubric sa Pagtataya ng Performans

4 3 2 1
Dimension Puntos Puntos Puntos Puntos

Pagkamalikhain Lubos na nagpamalas ng Naging malikhain sa Di-gaanong nagging Walang pinamalas na

pagkamalikhain sa paghahanda malikhain sa paghahanda pagkamalikhain sa
paghahanda paghahanda

Pagganap Lubos na nagging Nagging makatotohan at Di-gaanong Hindi nagging

makatotohanan at makatarungan sa pagganap makatotohanan at makatotohanan at
makatarungan ang makatarungan sa pagganap makatarungan sa pagganap
pagganap

Pagsasalita at Pagbigkas Lubhang nagging malinaw Naging malinaw ang Di-gaanong malinaw ang Hindi nagging malinawa
ang pagbigkas at pagbigkas at paghahatid ng pagbigkas at paghahatid ng ang pagbigkas at
paghahatid ng mensahe mensahe mensahe paghahatid ng mensahe

Kagamitan Angkop na angkop ang Angkop ang mga ginamit Di-gaanong angkop ang Hindi angkop ang mga
(props/ costume) ginamit na kagamitan na kagamitan ginamit na mga kagamitan ginamit na mga kagamitan
 Rubric sa Pagtataya ng Proyekto / Output

Puntos % Lebel Katangian ng Isinulat na komposisyon

9-10 90-100% Napakahusay Buo ang kaisipan, consistent, kumpleto ang detalye
Malinaw (hindi na manghuhula pa ang babasa kung ano ang layunin ng sumulat)
Gumamit ng wastong bantas

7-8 85-89% Mahusay May kaisahan at may sapat na detalye

May malinaw na intension
Gumamit ng wastong bantas

5-6 80-84% Katamtaman Konsistent, may kaisahan, kulang sa detalye

Di-gaanong malinaw ang intension
Gumamit ng wastong bantas

3-4 75-79% Mahina Hindi ganap ang pagkabuo

Kulang ang detalye
Di-malinaw ang intension
Hindi wasto ang bantas na ginagamit

0-2 74 Pababa Napakahina Hindi buo ang consistent, walang sapat na detalye
Malabo ang intension
Di-wasto ang bantas