SOAP Notes: History
SOAP Notes: History
Introduction
SOAP notes are a highly structured format for documenting the progress of a patient
during treatment and is only one of many possible formats that could be used by a health
History
SOAP notes were developed by Dr. Lawrence Weed in the 1960's at the University of
Vermont as part of the Problem-orientated medical record (POMR). Each SOAP note
would be associated with one of the problems identified by the primary physician, and so
formed only one part of the documentation process. However, various disciplines began
using only the "SOAP" aspect of the format, the "POMR" was not as widely adopted and
Quinn and Gordon (20o3) suggest that the major advantage of the SOAP documentation
format is its widespread adoption, leading to general familiarity with the concept within
the field of healthcare. It also emphasizes clear and well-organized documentation of
findings with a natural progression from the collection of relevant information to the
assessment to the plan on how to proceed.
However, the format has also been accused of encouraging documentation that is too
concise, overuse of abbreviations and acronyms, and that it is sometimes difficult for
non-professionals to decipher. Delitto and Snyder-Mackler (1995) have also suggested
that a sequential, rather than an integrative approach to clinical reasoning is encouraged,
as there is a tendency by the health professional to merely collect information and not
assess itl3l, They feel that the emphasis on the problem-orientated approach to
documentation is misplaced and that it is not conducive to clinical decision-making.
One major difficulty with SOAP notes for physiotherapists is the lack of guidance on how
to address functional outcomes or goals. Having said that, the format is not so rigid that
it cannot be adapted to take this into account.
Subjective
This component is ina detailed, narrative format and describes the patient's self-report
environmental history. It may also include information from the family or caregivers
and if exact phrasing is used, should be enclosed in quotation marks. The patient's goals
and prior response to treatment intervention are also included. Medical information
obtained from the patient's chart can also be included the therapist has not directly
observed these findings. 5
It allows the therapist to document the patient's perception of their condition as it relates
to their progress in rehabilitation, functional performance, or quality of life.
Common errors:
therapist.
Objectivee
This section outlines what the therapist observes, tests, and measures. Objective
The objective results of the re-assessment help to determine the progress towards
functional goals, and the effect of treatment. The therapist should indicate changes in the
patient's status, as well as communication with colleagues, family, or carers.
Common errors:
This is potentially the most important legal note because this is the therapist's
professional opinion in light of the subjective and objective findings. It should explain the
reasoning behind the decisions taken and clarify and support the analytical thinking
behind the problem-solving process. A prioritized problems list is generated with
impairments linked to functional limitations. International Classification of Functioning,
Disability, and Health (ICF) is very useful to determine and prioritized problem lists and
Progress towards the stated goals is indicated, as well as any factors affecting it that may
require modification of the frequency, duration or intervention itself. Adverse, as well as
Common errors:
Plan
The final component of the note includes anticipated goals and expected outcomes and
outlines the planned interventions to be used. Information should be provided
Common errors:
Goals 1. Pt. will demonstrate productive cough in seated position, 3/4 trials. 2. Pt. will
ambulate 15oft with supervision, no assistive device, on level indoor surfaces.
O: Auscultation findings: scattered rhonchi all lung fields. Chest PT was performed in
sitting lant. and post.). Techniques included percussion, vibration, and shaking. Pt.
performed a weak combined abdominal and upper costal cough that was non-
bronchospastic, congested, and non-productive. The cough/huff was performed with VC.
Pectoral stretch/thoracic cage mobilizations performed in seated position. Pt. given towel
roll placed in back of seat to open up ant. chest wall. Strengthening exercises in standing
pt. performed hip flexion, extension, and abduction; knee flexion 10 reps x 1 set B. Pt.
performs HEP with supervision (in evenings with wife). Pt. instructed to hold tissue over
trach when speaking to prevent infection and explained importance of drinking enough
water.
A: Pt. continues to present with congestion and limitations in coughing productivity. Pt.
has been compliant with evening exercise program, which has results in increased tol to
therapeutic exercise regime and an increase in LE strength. Amb. not attempted to 2° to
pt. report of fatigue. Pt. should be able to tolerate short distance ambulation within the