Scribd
Upload
61 views1 page

PFR Assignment 2

This document assigns a reading on human relations law from the New Civil Code of the Philippines. It lists 20 court cases organized under 7 topics: A) Principle of Abuse of Rights, B) On Unjust Enrichment, C) On Privacy and Human Dignity, D) Nonfeasance of Public Officials/Employees & Unfair Competition, E) On the Civil Action for Civil Liability Ex-Delicto, F) On Independent Civil Actions, and G) Prejudicial Question. The cases are to be read and studied as part of a law school assignment on human relations and the articles of the New Civil Code.

Uploaded by

Dei Gioerel Garbosa Balindoa
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
61 views1 page

PFR Assignment 2

This document assigns a reading on human relations law from the New Civil Code of the Philippines. It lists 20 court cases organized under 7 topics: A) Principle of Abuse of Rights, B) On Unjust Enrichment, C) On Privacy and Human Dignity, D) Nonfeasance of Public Officials/Employees & Unfair Competition, E) On the Civil Action for Civil Liability Ex-Delicto, F) On Independent Civil Actions, and G) Prejudicial Question. The cases are to be read and studied as part of a law school assignment on human relations and the articles of the New Civil Code.

Uploaded by

Dei Gioerel Garbosa Balindoa
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

PERSONS & FAMILY RELATIONS

LAW 100

PART II- ASSIGNMENT—HUMAN RELATIONS (Articles 19-36, NCC)

Read and Study the following cases:


A- Principle of Abuse of Rights [Arts. 19-21, CC]
1. Pro Line Sports Center, Inc. v. CA, G.R. No. 118192, Oct. 23, 1997;
2. Globe Mackay Cable and Radio Corp. v. CA, G.R. No. 81262, Aug. 25,
1989;
3. Wassmer v. Velez, G.R. No. L-20089, Dec. 26, 1964
4. Bunag, Jr. v. CA, G.R. No. 101749, July 10, 1992
5. Gashem Shookat Baksh v. CA, G.R. No. 97336, Feb. 19, 1993
6. Llorente v. Sandiganbayan, G.R. No. 85464, Oct. 3, 1991
7. MWSS v. Act Theater, Inc., G.R. No. 147076, June 17, 2004
8. Carpio v. Valmonte, G.R. No. 151866, Sept. 9, 2004
9. Coco-Cola Bottlers Phils. v. Bernardo, G.R. No. 190667, Nov. 7, 2016

B- On Unjust Enrichment [Arts. 22-23, CC]


10.Republic v. Ballocanag, G.R. No. 163794, Nov. 28, 2008
11.Loria v. Muñoz, Jr., G.R. No. 187240, Oct. 15, 2014
12.Republic v. Lacap, G.R. No. 158253, March 2, 2007

C- On Privacy and Human Dignity [Art. 26, CC]


13.RCPI v. Verchez, G.R. No. 164349, Jan. 31, 2006
14.Hing v. Choachuy, G.R. No. 179736, June 26, 2013

D- Nonfeasance of Public Officials/Employees & Unfair Competition [Arts. 27-28, CC]


15.Willaware Products Corp. v. Jesichris Manufacturing Corp., G.R. No.
195549, Sept. 3, 2014

E- On the Civil Action for Civil Liability Ex-Delicto [Arts. 29-30, 35, CC]
16.Dy v. People, G.R. No. 189081, Aug. 10, 2016
17.Daluraya v. Oliva, G.R. No. 210148, Dec. 08, 2014

F- On Independent Civil Actions [Arts. 32-34, 31 CC]


18.People v. Gerry Lipata y Ortiza, G.R. No. 200302, April 20, 2016

G- Prejudicial Question [Art. 36, CC; Rule 111, Sec. 6-7, RRCP]

19.Zapanta v. Montesa, G.R. No. L-14534. February 28, 1962.


20.Pimentel v. Pimentel, G.R. No. 172060, Sept. 13, 2010

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy