Cutting Costs Prior To Cutting Metal' in The Nonwovens Industry
Cutting Costs Prior To Cutting Metal' in The Nonwovens Industry
impact on the manufacturing process and product perfor- than the numerical techniques
mance. Table 1 shows a summary of flow related aspects in the • Extension of CFD capabilities to go far beyond hydrody-
NW industry. Using traditional experiments and testing namics:
In this paper, specific examples
are given to illustrate the cost- TABLE 1
effective deployment of CFD tools Nonwovens fabric making processes and sub-processes where CFD has been success-
to reduce the overall design time fully used for cost-effective design analysis and process optimization methods to quan-
and production costs. In the next tify and improve these processes is either infeasible or extraordinarily expensive for a
section, a general introduction to number of reasons: the measurements themselves are so intrusive that they distort the
CFD will be given. In the third sec- flows being measured; the opacity of the flowing fluid may hinder visualization; the
tion, two specific examples are pre- process transients (or flow instabilities) may be too fast to practically measure. In
sented to demonstrate the utility of response to these difficulties, polymer-oriented industries in general (and the NW
CFD. industry in particular) have adopted high tech tools like Computational Fluid
Dynamics (CFD) along with CAD and structural analysis to reduce the time to market
for new products, and to aid in troubleshooting and scale up of process lines [4-6].
Introduction to CFD
Notably, CFD analysis precedes any pilot testing or experiments involving so called
Computational Fluid Dynamics
"metal cutting" tasks.
(CFD) is an engineering tool used
for conducting virtual experiments
with significant time and cost sav-
ings. It complements and reduces NW Process Sub-processes
physical testing. CFD models fluid Upstream polymer Mixing, pelletizing, polymerization, extruders, gear pumps,
flow and heat transfer problems by processing melt flow distribution
solving the equations governing Spunbond Spin packs, bi-co spinnerets, quench box, diffusers,
conservation of mass, momentum, attenuators, aspirators, fiber laydown, thermal bonding
and energy, given a set of material Meltblown Dies, air delivery systems, Coanda devices, blower/
properties and operating condi- compressor designs, fiber laydown, suction box,
tions. Recent trends have con- thermal bonding
tributed to the rapid growth and Finishing Thermal bonding, air knives, carding, fluff making,
widespread adoption of CFD: fiber shred transport, hydroentanglement
• Easy-to-use Graphical user Product forming Diaper making, web handling, folding, vacuum assisted
interfaces (GUIs) transport, composite lines (SMS…), coating, ink jet printing,
• Dramatic increase in comput- gluing, drying
ing power and substantially lower End Use Moisture and liquid transport, capillarity, wicking, diffusion,
cost! sorption, saturation analysis, breathability,
• Shift of focus to understanding filtration, hydrophilicity
the engineering processes rather
Figure 4 Figure 6
POWER VS. FLOW COEFFICIENT CONTOURS OF STATIC PRESSURE
(INCHES OF WATER)
sity of 1%, viscosity ratio (turbulent/laminar) of 1.
• Outlet: Uniform velocity corresponding to a desired vol- • Efficiency: η = ΨΦ/Λ
ume flowrate (velocity equals volume flowrate/outlet area), In the above, Q is the volume flow rate, N is the rotational
with a direction pointing out of the domain, normal to the speed, D is the fan diameter, ρ is the density, ∆pt is the total
outlet surface. pressure rise, and P is the shaft power. For the CFD solutions,
• Inlet wall, casing: no slip in absolute frame the shaft power is computed as the product of the rotor torque
• Rotor walls: no slip in relative frame and the rotational speed. Also, static pressures were area aver-
Solutions were obtained for a range of flow rates so that fan aged at the inlet and outlet surfaces, and the total pressure
performance data could be generated and compared with the derived by adding the dynamic pressure based on the given
available test data. The following non-dimensional parame- flow rate to the static pressure.
ters were used to characterize the fan performance: A comparison of the predicted pressure rise coefficient,
• Flow Coefficient: Φ = Q/ND3 power coefficient, and efficiency versus flow rate with the
• Pressure Rise Coefficient: Ψ = ∆pt/ρN2D2 data is presented in Figures. 3 - 5. These results show excellent
• Power Coefficient: Λ= P/ρN3D5 agreement over the entire flowrate range. Figure 6 illustrates
Figure 10 Figure 11
TIME-AVERAGED VELOCITY VECTORS IN INSTANTANEOUS VELOCITY VEC-
A PLANAR TURBULENT JET TORS IN A PLANAR TURBULENT JET
Figure 13
FLOW FIELD IN DIFFERENT DIFFUSERS: (A) AN UNSTALLED DIFFUSER; (B) A DIFFUSER WITH
TRANSIENT STALL CONDITIONS; (C) A DIFFUSER WITH FULLY STALLED CONDITIONS
Conclusion
In recent years, CFD has been established as an effective
engineering tool that complements traditional design, analy-
sis and testing activities. Along with other CAE software
tools, CFD can provide significant cost and time savings dur-
Figure 17 ing the product life cycle. More specifically, as these tools
INSTANTANEOUS FLOW RESISTANCE MAP mainly impact pre-market activities, they can reduce both
ON THE FILTER MEDIUM time to market, as well as overall product development
investment.
Figure 18
RESISTANCE ALONG A DIAMETER (Z=0) OF THE PIPE ON THE FILTER SURFACE