Case Analysis - Group9 - New-Balance-Athletic
Case Analysis - Group9 - New-Balance-Athletic
GROUP
9
The value of strategy depends not only on
the elegance of its conception but fully as
much as whether the company proposing
the strategy can really execute it.
❑In 1980’s it setup a new manufacturing facility in New England and signed many international distributors.
❑Advertising and marketing were not their strong suit and their spending on marketing and advertisements.
was quite low as compared to the competitors.
❑US footwear industry was highly competitive with multiple players in the market.
❑Majorly the market was dominated by Nike and followed by Adidas and Reebok. In 2005, acquisition of
Reebok by Adidas was set to change the market dynamics.
❑ New balance now had to compete with two big competitors instead of one. This posed question for the
company on how to react to the change in the market.
Strategy
Skills Structure
Shared
Values
Staff
In 2004, proposal was to follow Toyota Production System (TPS) as per New
Balance Executional Excellence (NB2E). Instead of batch basis production to
follow pair-by –pair / continuous flow.
Product focused strategy - Energies and investment into research, design and
domestic manufacturing
Skills Structure
Shared
Values
Staff
Soft •
performance and manufacturing’s
Endorsement not done by athletes
• Unique in manufacturing and
operations based not marking
•
•
Team is oriented and empowered
Employees are organized and in
• Continuous improvement is the
mantra at management level.
based. • Buddy concept adopted for
Elements • Shoe in multiple width-fit is a critical
performance characteristic. • Company's culture is
entrepreneurial
•
cross functional team’s
New Balance screened employees mentoring new professionals
for their professional and personal withhold one for 6/8 week’s
• Strong focus on R&D,Designs and experience in team-based • Team based organisation of work
Domestic manufacturing environments. force.
• Endorsed by No One. • Flexible to take up multitasking
• 75% outsourced production activities based on hourly
activities’ compensation model.
Case Analysis -SWOT
INTERNAL FACTORS New Balance Opportunities Threats
STRENGTHS (+) WEAKNESSES (–) TOWS
US Branding – New Balance manufactures its Expensive – Manufacturing in America is costlier
shoes in America, unlike its competitors compared to outsourcing it
Strength Strength Opportunities (SO) Strength Threats (ST) Strategy
Strategy
Customization & Differentiation – One of the Customization Cost – Feature rich shoes are
first brands to manufacture customized shoes. more expensive to manufacture
Customers can custom design their shoes and
✓Consolidate and expand the ✓NB can build on present
have them delivered within a day Influencer preferences – Teenagers are more
market position. strengths
inclined towards pop culture and internet
Strong Association with Top Players – influences. They are turning towards European
✓Superior product and services ✓Analyze the trend and build
Association with major baseball leagues and brands more now than ever, which affects New
quality can help NB to further processes to two pronged
sponsoring prestigious sporting events has balance sales
increase its market share as the market penetration approach.
increased New Balance’s popularity
current customer are particularly
loyal to it.
Brand Placement – Strategic brand placement in
movies has improved popularity
Weakness Weakness Opportunity (WO) Weakness Threats (WT)
Strategy Strategy
EXTERNAL FACTORS
OPPORTUNITIES (+) THREATS (–) ✓Building strategies based on ✓NB should get out of the
Changing preferences - With a growing Competition: New Balance competitors are Nike, consumer oriented product business areas which do not
power to spend, the customer preferences Adidas, and Puma development and marketing have a good ROI and focus on
are also changing. Customers are willing to approach. strength and threats box , or on
invest more in custom-designed shoes. Piracy: Cheap fake imitations of leading footwear weakness and opportunities
New Balance is one of the first companies brands which are sold at a very low price has always box.
to make custom shoes and they have ✓NB should incorporate
been a threat. Most customers want the look and not
fundamental changes to
captured this trend proficiently which makes the quality and they purchase the fakes which leads to
business model rather than
them a forerunner the brand missing out.
cosmetic changes.
Case Analysis – VRIN MODEL
Resource/ Capability Is it Valuable? Is it Rare? Is it Inimitable? Is it Non- Substitutable? Comments
Core Competency th at provide competitive advantages?
Technological Resources(T)
YES
Pate nts, trade m ark s
-Uni que i n m anufacturi ng and ope rati ons base d not m ark i ng
Copyri ghts
base d.
Producti on te chnology
YES YES YES YES -Sale s force autom ati on syste m for supply chai n proce ss to
i m prove sale s pe rform ance .
-Product Strate gy –De di cate d de si gn focusi ng on wi dth si zi ng and
fi t.
Relationships (IT) NO
T he trust e stabli she d wi th vari ous partne rs -Sale s and Di stri buti ons- Focuse d m ai nly i n sm all re tai le r’s
Re tai le rs YES NO YES NO ,spe ci alty store s and fam i ly footwe ar shop’s
Sale s Age nts -Re tai le r’s – Di vi de d i nto 2 group (Ke y Account & Spe ci alty de ale r’s
De ale rs )