Scribd
Upload
776 views1 page

Comparison SAP ATTP Vs Trace Links

ATTP integrates SAP master data and transactions directly, supports various EPCIS standards for tracking serialized data, and provides extensive country-specific reporting capabilities. In contrast, Tracelink requires manual master data maintenance, lacks standard SAP integration interfaces, and has more limited EPCIS and country reporting support. Additionally, ATTP can leverage the in-memory capabilities of SAP HANA while Tracelink uses a NoSQL database with no other options.

Uploaded by

ravinash1986
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
776 views1 page

Comparison SAP ATTP Vs Trace Links

ATTP integrates SAP master data and transactions directly, supports various EPCIS standards for tracking serialized data, and provides extensive country-specific reporting capabilities. In contrast, Tracelink requires manual master data maintenance, lacks standard SAP integration interfaces, and has more limited EPCIS and country reporting support. Additionally, ATTP can leverage the in-memory capabilities of SAP HANA while Tracelink uses a NoSQL database with no other options.

Uploaded by

ravinash1986
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

Comparison SAP ATTP Vs Trace Links

ATTP Tracelink
Business Partner, Locations (Plant/Storage Location), Requires manual efforts for master data maintenance
Master Master
Product master data and batch (lot) information can be
Data integrated in bulk or real-time from SAP out of the box
Data

SAP delivered interfaces for validating/processing No standard interfaces delivered for integrating
Warehouse SCWM/WM transactions in S4/ECC/EWM instances
Warehouse warehouse transactions in SAP S4/ECC/EWM
Integratio against serialized data in ATTP Integratio
n n
Supports EPCIS 1.0, 1.1, 1.2 formats, with the ability to Limited support for EPCIS formats both for inbound and
EPCIS process inbound data in all three formats and report EPCIS outbound scenarios
Standard outbound notifications in any format required by a Standard
s partner s
Extensive country specific reporting in latest versions Limited country specific reporting
Country for US (DSCSA lot, item), EU, India (Dava 2.0), Russia Country
Reporting (1.34), Brazil, Argentina, China, Turkey and South Korea Reporting

Can be deployed on HANA, bringing with it all the Uses No SQL database with no other alternatives
In- advantages and benefits of an in-memory database for In-
Memory a data intensive serialization environment Memory
Database Database

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy