0% found this document useful (0 votes)
84 views18 pages

RPMS Tool For Teacher I-III: (Proficient Teachers) S.Y. 2020-2021

This document provides the position and competency profile for teachers levels I-III in the Department of Education for the 2020-2021 school year. It outlines the job summary, qualification standards including education, experience and eligibility requirements, duties and responsibilities, and performance indicators for evaluating teachers on their content knowledge and pedagogy. Teachers are evaluated on their mastery of content knowledge across learning areas, use of teaching strategies and classroom management, environment conducive for learning, addressing learner diversity, curriculum implementation, monitoring learner progress, and personal and professional growth.

Uploaded by

Keara Mhie
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
84 views18 pages

RPMS Tool For Teacher I-III: (Proficient Teachers) S.Y. 2020-2021

This document provides the position and competency profile for teachers levels I-III in the Department of Education for the 2020-2021 school year. It outlines the job summary, qualification standards including education, experience and eligibility requirements, duties and responsibilities, and performance indicators for evaluating teachers on their content knowledge and pedagogy. Teachers are evaluated on their mastery of content knowledge across learning areas, use of teaching strategies and classroom management, environment conducive for learning, addressing learner diversity, curriculum implementation, monitoring learner progress, and personal and professional growth.

Uploaded by

Keara Mhie
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 18

RPMS Tool for Teacher I-III

(Proficient Teachers)
S.Y. 2020-2021
POSITION AND COMPETENCY PROFILE PCP No. ______ Revision Code: 00

Department of Education

Position Title Teacher I - III Salary Grade

Parenthetical Title

Office Unit Effectivity Date

Reports to Principal/School Heads Page/s

Position Supervised

JOB SUMMARY

QUALIFICATION STANDARDS
A. CSC Prescribed Qualifications (For Senior High School Teachers, please refer to: DO 3, s. 2016; DO 27, s. 2016; and DO 51, s. 2017)

Position Title Teacher I Teacher II Teacher III

Education For Elementary School – Bachelor of Elementary Education (BEEd) or Bachelor’s degree plus 18 professional units in Education,
or Bachelor in Secondary Education, or its equivalent

For Secondary School – Bachelor of Secondary Education (BSEd) or Bachelor’s degree plus 18 professional units in Education
with appropriate major or Bachelor in Secondary Education, or its equivalent

Experience None required 1 year relevant experience 2 years relevant experience

Eligibility RA 1080 RA 1080 RA 1080


Trainings None required None required None required

B. Preferred Qualifications

Education BSE/BSEEd/College Graduate with Education units (18-21), at least 18 MA units

Experience

Eligibility PBET/LET/BLEPT Passer

Trainings In-service training

1
RPMS Tool for S.Y. 2020-2021 | Proficient Teachers

DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES

1. Applies mastery of content knowledge and its application across learning areas

2. Facilitates learning using appropriate and innovative teaching strategies and classroom management practices

3. Manages an environment conducive to learning

4. Addresses learner diversity

5. Implements and supervises curricular and co-curricular programs to support learning

6. Monitors and evaluates learner progress and undertakes activities to improve learner performance

7. Maintains updated records of learners’ progress

8. Counsels and guides learners

9. Works with relevant stakeholders, both internal and external, to promote learning and improve school performance

10. Undertakes activities towards personal and professional growth

11. Does related work

2
RPMS Tool for S.Y. 2020-2021 | Proficient Teachers
KRA 1: Content Knowledge and Pedagogy
OBJECTIVE MEANS OF PERFORMANCE INDICATOR
VERIFICATION
QET Outstanding Very Satisfactory Unsatisfact Poor
(5) Satisfactory (3) ory (2) (1)
(4)

1. Applied Main MOV: Quality Demonstrat Demonstrat Demonstrat Demonstrat Demonstrated


knowledge Classroom ed Level 7 ed Level 6 ed Level 5 ed Level 4 Level 3 in
of content Observation in in in in Objective 1 as
within and Tool (COT) rating Objective 1 as Objective 1 as Objective 1 as Objective 1 as shown in COTs
across sheet or inter- shown in shown in shown in shown in with an average
curriculum observer agreement COTs with an COTs with an COTs with an COTs with an transmuted
teaching areas form on knowledge average average average average rating ranging
of content within transmuted transmuted transmuted transmuted from
and across rating ranging rating rating rating ranging 1.000-1.499
curriculum from 4.500- ranging ranging from 1.500-
teaching areas 5.000 from 3.500- from 2.500- 2.499 or
4.499 3.499
Supporting MOV: No acceptable
Any 1 used evidence was
during shown
observation that
highlights Efficiency Submitted 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No acceptable
application of COT rating COT rating COT rating COT rating evidence was
knowledge of sheets/inter sheets/inter sheets/inter sheet/inter shown
content within observer observer observer observer
and across agreement agreement agreement agreement
curriculum forms, each forms, each forms, each form with any
teaching areas with any 1 of with any 1 of with any 1 of 1 of the
• Lesson plan the the the Supporting
• Instructional Supporting MOV Supporting Supporting MOV
material MOV MOV
• Performance task
• Test material Timeliness COT rating COT rating COT rating COT rating No acceptable
• Activity sheet sheets/inter sheets/inter sheets/inter sheet(s)/inter evidence was
• Others (Please observer observer observer observer shown
specify and agreement agreement agreement agreement
provide forms forms forms form(s)
annotations) submitted were submitted submitted submitted in
distributed were were 1 quarter
across 4 distributed distributed
quarters across 3 across 2
quarters quarters

RPMS Tool for S.Y. 2020-2021 | Proficient Teachers


KRA 1: Content Knowledge and Pedagogy
OBJECTIVE MEANS OF PERFORMANCE INDICATOR
VERIFICATION
QET Outstanding Very Satisfactory Unsatisfact Poor
(5) Satisfactory (3) ory (2) (1)
(4)

2. Ensured Main MOV: Quality Demonstrat Demonstrat Demonstrat Demonstrat Demonstrated


the positive Classroom ed Level 7 ed Level 6 ed Level 5 ed Level 4 Level 3 in
use of ICT to Observation Tool in in in in Objective 2 as
facilitate (COT) rating sheet Objective 2 as Objective 2 as Objective 2 as Objective 2 as shown in COTs
the or inter-observer shown in shown in shown in shown in with an average
teaching agreement form on COTs with an COTs with an COTs with an COTs with an transmuted
and the positive use of average average average average rating ranging
learning ICT to facilitate the transmuted transmuted transmuted transmuted from
process teaching and rating ranging rating rating rating ranging 1.000-1.499
learning process from 4.500- ranging ranging from 1.500-
5.000 from 3.500- from 2.500- 2.499 or
Supporting MOV: 4.499 3.499
Any 1 used No acceptable
during evidence was
observation that shown
highlights positive
use of ICT (i.e. Efficiency Submitted 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No acceptable
safe, legal and COT rating COT rating COT rating COT rating evidence was
ethical use of sheets/inter sheets/inter sheets/inter sheet/inter shown
digital information) observer observer observer observer
to facilitate the agreement agreement agreement agreement
teaching and forms, each forms, each forms, each form with any
learning process • with any 1 of with any 1 of with any 1 of 1 of the
Lesson plan the the the Supporting
• Instructional Supporting MOV Supporting Supporting MOV
material MOV MOV
• Performance task Timeliness COT rating COT rating COT rating COT rating No acceptable
• Test material sheets/inter sheets/inter sheets/inter sheet(s)/inter evidence was
• Activity sheet observer observer observer observer shown
• Others (Please agreement agreement agreement agreement
specify and forms forms forms form(s)
provide submitted were submitted submitted submitted in
annotations) distributed were were 1 quarter
across 4 distributed distributed
quarters across 3 across 2
quarters quarters

RPMS Tool for S.Y. 2020-2021 | Proficient Teachers


KRA 1: Content Knowledge and Pedagogy
OBJECTIVE MEANS OF PERFORMANCE INDICATOR
VERIFICATION
QET Outstanding Very Satisfactory Unsatisfact Poor
(5) Satisfactory (3) ory (2) (1)
(4)

3. Displayed Classroom Quality Demonstrat Demonstrat Demonstrat Demonstrat Demonstrated


proficient Observation Tool ed Level 7 ed Level 6 ed Level 5 ed Level 4 Level 3 in
use of (COT) rating sheet in in in in Objective 3 as
Mother or inter-observer Objective 3 as Objective 3 as Objective 3 as Objective 3 as shown in COTs
Tongue, agreement form shown in shown in shown in shown in with an average
Filipino and on the use of COTs with an COTs with an COTs with an COTs with an transmuted
English to Mother average average average average rating ranging
facilitate Tongue, Filipino, transmuted transmuted transmuted transmuted from
teaching and English to rating ranging rating rating rating ranging 1.000-1.499
and facilitate teaching from 4.500- ranging ranging from 1.500-
learning and learning 5.000 from 3.500- from 2.500- 2.499 or
4.499 3.499
No acceptable
evidence was
shown

Efficiency Submitted 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No acceptable


COT rating COT rating COT rating COT rating evidence was
sheets/inter sheets/inter sheets/inter sheet/inter shown
observer observer observer observer
agreement agreement agreement agreement form
forms forms forms

Timeliness COT rating COT rating COT rating COT rating No acceptable
sheets/inter sheets/inter sheets/inter sheet(s)/inter evidence was
observer observer observer observer shown
agreement agreement agreement agreement
forms forms forms form(s)
submitted were submitted submitted submitted in
distributed were were 1 quarter
across 4 distributed distributed
quarters across 3 across 2
quarters quarters

RPMS Tool for S.Y. 2020-2021 | Proficient Teachers


KRA 2: Learning Environment & Diversity of Learners
OBJECTIVE MEANS OF PERFORMANCE INDICATOR
VERIFICATION
QET Outstanding Very Satisfactory Unsatisfact Poor
(5) Satisfactory (3) ory (2) (1)
(4)

4. Established Classroom Quality Demonstrat Demonstrat Demonstrat Demonstrat Demonstrated


safe and Observation ed Level 7 ed Level 6 ed Level 5 ed Level 4 Level 3 in
secure Tool (COT) in in in in Objective 4 as
learning rating sheet or Objective 4 as Objective 4 as Objective 4 as Objective 4 as shown in COTs
environments inter-observer shown in shown in shown in shown in with an average
to enhance agreement form COTs with an COTs with an COTs with an COTs with an transmuted
learning on safe and average average average average rating ranging
through the secure transmuted transmuted transmuted transmuted from
consistent learning rating ranging rating rating rating ranging 1.000-1.499
implementatio environments to from 4.500- ranging ranging from 1.500-
n of policies, enhance 5.000 from 3.500- from 2.500- 2.499 or
guidelines learning 4.499 3.499
and through the No acceptable
procedures consistent evidence was
implementation shown
of policies,
guidelines and Efficiency Submitted 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No acceptable
procedures COT rating COT rating COT rating COT rating evidence was
sheets/inter sheets/inter sheets/inter sheet/inter shown
observer observer observer observer
agreement agreement agreement agreement form
forms forms forms

Timeliness COT rating COT rating COT rating COT rating No acceptable
sheets/inter sheets/inter sheets/inter sheet(s)/inter evidence was
observer observer observer observer shown
agreement agreement agreement agreement
forms forms forms form(s)
submitted were submitted submitted submitted in
distributed were were 1 quarter
across 4 distributed distributed
quarters across 3 across 2
quarters quarters

RPMS Tool for S.Y. 2020-2021 | Proficient Teachers


KRA 2: Learning Environment & Diversity of Learners
OBJECTIVE MEANS OF PERFORMANCE INDICATOR
VERIFICATION
QET Outstandi Very Satisfactory Unsatisfact Poor
ng (5) Satisfactory (3) ory (2) (1)
(4)
5. Main MOV: Quality Demonstrat Demonstrat Demonstrat Demonstrat Demonstrated
Maintained Classroom ed Level 7 ed Level 6 ed Level 5 ed Level 4 Level 3 in
supportive Observation Tool in in in in Objective 5 as
learning (COT) rating sheet or Objective 5 Objective 5 as Objective 5 as Objective 5 as shown in COTs
environmen inter-observer as shown in shown in shown in shown in with an average
ts that agreement form on COTs with COTs with an COTs with an COTs with an transmuted
nurture supportive learning an average average average average rating ranging
and inspire environments that transmuted transmuted transmuted transmuted from
learners to nurture and inspire rating rating rating rating ranging 1.000-1.499
participate, learners to ranging ranging ranging from 1.500-
cooperate participate, from 4.500- from 3.500- from 2.500- 2.499 or
and cooperate and 5.000 4.499 3.499
collaborate collaborate in No acceptable
in continued learning evidence was
continued shown
learning Supporting MOV:
Any 1 used during Efficiency Submitted 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No acceptable
observation that COT rating COT rating COT rating COT rating evidence was
highlights supportive sheets/int sheets/inter sheets/inter sheet/inter shown
learning er observer observer observer
environments that observer agreement agreement agreement
nurture and inspire agreement forms, each forms, each form with any
learners to forms, each with any 1 of with any 1 of 1 of the
participate, with any 1 of the the Supporting
cooperate and the Supporting Supporting MOV
collaborate in Supporting MOV MOV
continued learning MOV
• Lesson plan
• Instructional Timeliness COT rating COT rating COT rating COT rating No acceptable
material sheets/inter sheets/inter sheets/inter sheet(s)/inter evidence was
• Performance task observer observer observer observer shown
• Test material agreement agreement agreement agreement
• Activity sheet forms forms forms form(s)
• Others (Please submitted submitted submitted submitted in
were were were 1 quarter
specify and provide
distributed distributed distributed
annotations)
across 4 across 3 across 2
quarters quarters quarters

7
RPMS Tool for S.Y. 2020-2021 | Proficient Teachers
KRA 2: Learning Environment & Diversity of Learners
OBJECTIVE MEANS OF PERFORMANCE INDICATOR
VERIFICATION
QET Outstanding Very Satisfactory Unsatisfact Poor
(5) Satisfactory (3) ory (2) (1)
(4)

6. Main MOV: Quality Demonstrat Demonstrat Demonstrat Demonstrat Demonstrated


Established Classroom ed Level 7 ed Level 6 ed Level 5 ed Level 4 Level 3 in
a learner Observation Tool in in in in Objective 6 as
centered (COT) rating Objective 6 as Objective 6 as Objective 6 as Objective 6 as shown in COTs
culture by sheet or inter- shown in shown in shown in shown in with an average
using observer agreement COTs with an COTs with an COTs with an COTs with an transmuted
teaching form on the use of average average average average rating ranging
strategies teaching transmuted transmuted transmuted transmuted from
that respond strategies that rating rating rating rating ranging 1.000-1.499
to respond to learners’ ranging ranging ranging from 1.500-
their linguistic, cultural, from 4.500- from 3.500- from 2.500- 2.499 or
linguistic, socio 5.000 4.499 3.499
cultural, economic, and No acceptable
socio religious background evidence was
economic shown
and Supporting MOV:
religious Any 1 used Efficiency Submitted 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No acceptable
backgrounds during COT rating COT rating COT rating COT rating evidence was
observation that sheets/inter sheets/inter sheets/inter sheet/inter shown
highlights the use of observer observer observer observer
teaching strategies agreement agreement agreement agreement
that respond to forms, each forms, each forms, each form with any
learners’ linguistic, 1 of the
with any 1 of with any 1 of with any 1 of
cultural, Supporting
the the the
socio-economic MOV
Supporting Supporting Supporting
and/or religious MOV MOV MOV
backgrounds •
Lesson plan Timeliness COT rating COT rating COT rating COT rating No acceptable
• Instructional sheets/inter sheets/inter sheets/inter sheet(s)/inter evidence was
material observer observer observer observer shown
• Performance task agreement agreement agreement agreement
• Test material forms forms forms form(s)
• Activity sheet submitted submitted submitted submitted in
• Others (Please were were were 1 quarter
specify and distributed distributed distributed
provide across 4 across 3 across 2
annotations) quarters quarters quarters

RPMS Tool for S.Y. 2020-2021 | Proficient Teachers


KRA 3: Curriculum and Planning & Assessment and Reporting
OBJECTIVE MEANS OF PERFORMANCE INDICATOR
VERIFICATION
QET Outstanding Very Satisfactory Unsatisfact Poor
(5) Satisfactory (3) ory (2) (1)
(4)

7. Used Classroom Quality Demonstrat Demonstrat Demonstrat Demonstrat Demonstrated


strategies Observation Tool ed Level 7 ed Level 6 ed Level 5 ed Level 4 Level 3 in
for (COT) rating sheet in in in in Objective 7 as
providing or inter-observer Objective 7 as Objective 7 as Objective 7 as Objective 7 as shown in COTs
timely, agreement form shown in shown in shown in shown in with an average
accurate on the use of COTs with an COTs with an COTs with an COTs with an transmuted
and strategies for average average average average rating ranging
constructiv providing timely, transmuted transmuted transmuted transmuted from
e feedback accurate and rating ranging rating rating rating ranging 1.000-1.499
to constructive from 4.500- ranging ranging from 1.500-
improve feedback to 5.000 from 3.500- from 2.500- 2.499 or
learner improve learner 4.499 3.499
performance performance No acceptable
evidence was
shown

Efficiency Submitted 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No acceptable


COT rating COT rating COT rating COT rating evidence was
sheets/inter sheets/inter sheets/inter sheet/inter shown
observer observer observer observer
agreement agreement agreement agreement form
forms forms forms
Timeliness COT rating COT rating COT rating COT rating No acceptable
sheets/inter sheets/inter sheets/inter sheet(s)/inter evidence was
observer observer observer observer shown
agreement agreement agreement agreement
forms forms forms form(s)
submitted were submitted submitted submitted in
distributed were were 1 quarter
across 4 distributed distributed
quarters across 3 across 2
quarters quarters

RPMS Tool for S.Y. 2020-2021 | Proficient Teachers


KRA 3: Curriculum and Planning & Assessment and Reporting
OBJECTIVE MEANS OF VERIFICATION PERFORMANCE INDICATOR

QET Outstandi Very Satisfactory Unsatisfact Poor


ng (5) Satisfactory (3) ory (2) (1)
(4)

8. Utilized Main MOV: Quality Implemente Developed Planned Analyzed No


assessment List of identified least/most d a teaching materials for a learners’ acceptable
data to mastered skills based on and learning based on teaching mastered evidence
inform the the frequency of strategy/ learners’ and skills based was shown
modification errors/correct responses program assessment learning on the
of teaching using data as strategy frequency of
and learning Supporting MOV: materials and/or
Any document that used the evidenced errors and
practices based on by the Main program correct
Main MOV submitted to inform the
and modification of teaching and learners’ MOV and based on responses as
programs learning practices and programs assessment Supporting learners’ evidenced by
1. Lesson plan/Activity log for data as MOV No. 2 assessment the Main MOV
remediation/enhancement evidenced data as
utilizing of assessment data evidenced
to modify teaching and
by the Main
MOV and by the Main
learning practices or
programs Supporting MOV and
2. Intervention material used for MOV No. 3 Supporting
remediation/reinforcement/ MOV No. 1
enhancement Efficiency Submitted Submitted Submitted Submitted the No
3. Accomplishment report the Main the Main the Main Main MOV acceptable
for remedial/enhancement MOV MOV MOV with any 1 of evidence
activities (e.g. remedial with any 4 with any 3 with any 2 the was shown
sessions, Summer Reading
Camp, Phil-IRI-based
of the of the of the acceptable
reading program) acceptable acceptable acceptable Supporting
Supporting Supporting Supporting MOV
MOV MOV MOV

Timeliness

10

RPMS Tool for S.Y. 2020-2021 | Proficient Teachers


KRA 3: Curriculum and Planning & Assessment and Reporting
OBJECTIVE MEANS OF VERIFICATION PERFORMANCE INDICATOR

QET Outstandi Very Satisfactory Unsatisfact Poor


ng (5) Satisfactory (3) ory (2) (1)
(4)

9. Set Main MOV: Quality Learning Learning Learning Learning No


achievable One (1) lesson plan with outcomes set outcomes outcomes outcomes set acceptable
and achievable and are all set are set are are not evidence
appropriate appropriate learning aligned with mostly occasiona aligned with was shown
learning outcomes that are the aligned with lly aligned the learning
outcomes aligned with learning learning the learning with competencies
that are competencies competencies competencies the learning
aligned competencies
with Efficiency Submitted Submitted Submitted Submitted No
learning Supporting MOV: lesson plan lesson plan lesson plan lesson plan acceptable
competenci Any 1 that shows with any 4 with any 3 with any 2 with any 1 of evidence
es alignment of learning of the of the of the the was shown
outcomes with the learning Supporting Supporting Supporting Supporting
competencies MOV MOV MOV MOV
• performance task
• rubric for assessing
performance using
criteria that
appropriately describe the Timeliness
target output • tiered
activity
• sample of an
accomplished checklist
of target skills learned
by a learner
• others (Please specify
and provide
annotations)

11

RPMS Tool for S.Y. 2020-2021 | Proficient Teachers


KRA 4: Community Linkages and Professional Engagement & Personal Growth and Professional Development
OBJECTIVE MEANS OF PERFORMANCE INDICATOR
VERIFICATION
QET Outstanding Very Satisfactory Unsatisfact Poor
(5) Satisfactory (3) ory (2) (1)
(4)
10. Built 1. Communication Quality Implemented Planned Communicat Communicat No
relationship letter with reply slip program/proje program/ ed and ed with acceptable
s with 2. Parent-teacher ct with project with obtained parents/ evidence
parents/ log/ Minutes of parents/ parents/ response guardians was shown
guardians parent guardians from parents/ and/or wider
guardians
and the teacher and/or wider guardians school
and/or wider
wider conference/proof of school and/or wider community to
school
school other stakeholders community school facilitate
community
community meeting to facilitate community to involvement
to facilitate
to facilitate 3. Minutes of the involvement facilitate in the
stakeholders involvement
involvement in the in the involvement educative
in the meeting with proof in the
educative educative process as
of
educative process as process as educative evidenced by
process attendance
4. Proof of involvement evidenced by evidenced process as MOV No. 1
in school and wider MOV No. 4 by MOV evidenced by but no
community or MOV No. 2 or MOV No. 1 response/reply
partnerships (e.g. No. 5 MOV No. 3
certificate,
narrative report,
MOU/MOA or Deed
of Donation) Efficiency Submitted Submitted Submitted Submitted No
5. Proof of participation any 4 of the any 3 of the any 2 of the any 1 of the acceptable
in activities for evidence
acceptable acceptable acceptable MOV acceptable MOV
improved access to was shown
education MOV MOV
such as
• Child Mapping
Form • Child Find
Form Timeliness
(SPED)
• Literacy Mapping
Form (ALS)

12

RPMS Tool for S.Y. 2020-2021 | Proficient Teachers


KRA 4: Community Linkages and Professional Engagement & Personal Growth and Professional Development
OBJECTIVE MEANS OF PERFORMANCE INDICATOR
VERIFICATION QET Outstanding Very Satisfactory Unsatisfact Poor
(5) Satisfactory (3) ory (2) (1)
(4)

11. • Certificate of Quality Participated Participated Participated Participated No


Participated participation in a in in in in acceptable
in training, seminar, professional professional professional professional evidence
professional workshop, writeshop, was shown
or symposium
networks at networks at networks at networks at
networks to • Certificate of recognition least once least once least once least once
share in a training, seminar, in the in the in the in the grade
knowledge workshop, writeshop, division/ district/ departme level to share
and to or symposium regional/ cluster level nt/ knowledge
enhance • Certificate of national/ to share school and to
practice membership/officersh international knowledge level enhance
ip in any and to to share practice as
level to
registered/accredited enhance knowledge
educational/ share evidenced by
professional knowledge practice as and to any 1 of the
organization or DepEd and to evidenced by enhance submitted MOV
recognized enhance any 1 of the practice as
club/organization practice as submitted MOV evidenced
• Any proof of participation evidenced by by any 1 of
to a benchmarking the
activity
any 1 of the
submitted MOV submitted
• Any proof of committee
involvement as MOV
chairperson/member in
a training, seminar, Efficiency Submitted 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted No
workshop, writeshop, or different different different any 1 of the acceptable
symposium (e.g. kinds of kinds of kinds of acceptable evidence
working committee acceptable acceptable MOV was shown
noted by
acceptable
MOV MOV MOV
proponent/certification)
• Any proof of utilization of
published articles or
downloaded teaching
and learning
Timeliness
resources (e.g.
lesson plan)
• Others (Please specify
and provide
annotations)

13
RPMS Tool for S.Y. 2020-2021 | Proficient Teachers
KRA 4: Community Linkages and Professional Engagement & Personal Growth and Professional Development
OBJECTIVE MEANS OF PERFORMANCE INDICATOR
VERIFICATION
QET Outstanding Very Satisfactory Unsatisfact Poor
(5) Satisfactory (3) ory (2) (1)
(4)

12. Developed Main MOV: Quality Updated the Planned for Formulated Accomplish No
a personal Individual Performance Developme interventio learning ed the acceptable
improvemen Commitment and nt Plan ns to satisfy objectives Strengths evidence
t plan Review Form- during the in the and was shown
based on Development Plan Phase IV of given Developme Development
reflection of (IPCRF-DP) the RPMS objectives in nt Plan to Needs portion
one’s cycle the address of the
practice Supporting MOV: Development
Development Developme
and ongoing Any document aligned Plan after self
Plan nt Needs
professional with the IPCRF-DP such assessment at
learning as • Reflection on LAC the beginning
sessions with proof of of the school
attendance year
• Personal notes journal
on division/school-
led
INSET with proof of
attendance Efficiency Submitted Submitted Submitted Submitted the No
• Certificate of enrolment/ the IPCRF- the IPCRF- the IPCRF- IPCRF-DP acceptable
registration form/class DP with any DP with any DP with any with any 1 evidence
card in graduate/post 4 of the 3 of the 2 of the of the was shown
grad school/on-line Supporting Supporting Supporting Supporting
courses MOV MOV MOV MOV
• Lesson plan
highlighting the
improvement done
based on
accomplished
“reflection” section
• Others (Please specify Timeliness
and provide
annotations)

14
RPMS Tool for S.Y. 2020-2021 | Proficient Teachers
KRA 5: Plus Factor
OBJECTIVE MEANS OF PERFORMANCE INDICATOR
VERIFICATION
QET Outstanding Very Satisfactory Unsatisfact Poor
(5) Satisfactory (3) ory (2) (1)
(4)

13. Performed Proof of: Quality Performed at Performed at Performed Performed at No


various • committee least 1 least 1 at least 1 least 1 related acceptable
related related related related work/activity evidence
involvement
works/activiti work/activity work/activity work/activity that was shown
es that • advisorship of co that that that contributed to
contribute to curricular activities contributed contributed contributed the teaching
the teaching • book or journal to the to the to the learning
learning authorship/ teaching teaching teaching process
process learning learning learning within the
contributorship
process process process class as
• coordinatorship/ beyond the within the within the evidenced by
chairpersonship school/ school/ learning submitted
• coaching and Community Community area/ MOV
mentoring learners Learning Learning department
Center Center as
in competitions
(CLC) as (CLC) as evidenced by
• serving as reliever evidenced submitted
evidenced
of classes in the by submitted by submitted MOV
absence of MOV MOV
teachers • mentoring
pre-service teachers Efficiency Submitted Submitted Submitted Submitted No
• participation in any 4 of the any 3 of the any 2 of the any 1 of the acceptable
acceptable acceptable acceptable acceptable MOV evidence
demonstrations was shown
MOV MOV MOV
teaching
• others (Please
specify and provide
annotations)
Timeliness

15
RPMS Tool for S.Y. 2020-2021 | Proficient Teachers

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy