Reaction Paper On Victimology
Reaction Paper On Victimology
Assignment Topics:
1. Students are required to make summary of the topic, comments, evaluation and
recommendations in writing of every topic presented supported with related
literature with references.
I. Summary of the Topics
It is only within the recent past that domestic violence has been considered a crime
justifying the intervention of Criminal Justice System. Way back, much of what
we considered and categorized a domestic violence were once viewed as “normal”
in the society, a part of a marriage life or in any relationship that one should
expect, accept and bear with. “In medieval times, husbands had the power over the
life and death of their dependents and the unrestrained right to physical
chastisement of members of the household including their wives and children”.
(Pleck, 1987)
For so many years, the liberty of the perpetrators of gender violence has been
challenged and questioned sending a clear message that domestic violence is a
serious offense. Domestic violence was redefined from what was once private
issue as public concern warranting the involvement from the Criminal Justice
System. The effort of women’s movement has yield results such as assault and
raped now formally defined as criminal offense even though the perpetrator is the
victim’s husband.
Just as the public has slowly become more conscientious of domestic violence in
the community and the police response has developed gradually, the court has also
established principles relating to reparation, including compensation and
rehabilitation of victims. The RA 7309 –the law which creates the Board of Claims
that incorporates the victims’ compensation program which can be applied through
Secretariat of the Board of Claims, Department of Justice (DOJ) within 6 months
from when the victim suffered damage or injury were also established. Nowadays,
the courts in its decision may either upon request or on its own motion in
exceptional circumstances, may determine the scope and extent of any damage,
loss and injury to, or in respect of victims and will state the principles on which it
is acting. (Victims’ Rights in “Philippines - Crimes Act,” n.d.)
II. Reactions
The Criminal Justice System has historically served as the main vehicle in
community’s response to domestic violence. Throughout reading of different
materials, there are learnings on how it gradually transform from one that was
reserve in terms to tackling issues on domestic violence or intimate-partner
violence to one that seeks out to reduce the harmful consequences of act (s) after it
has occurred and prevent further violence from occurring once identified. To
which in my thoughts, this new approaches of CJS to domestic violence have
progressively changed the way government agencies including in our country
interact with the public. That, it is noteworthy to see the sense of urgency to take
appropriate measures to address the victims’ fear of retaliation or further violence
or escalation of violence has been slowly considered and incorporated in our legal
framework and legislation.
On Victim Reparation
The question of what is reparation simultaneously gives rise to the question
what should be the aim of the reparation. Victims of crimes including domestic
violence which involved shattered trust and feelings of security must not only be
given monetary claims. It should also aim to heal and allow victims to cope form
with the past as well as the future.
Victims are generally unable to return to their original condition and they are
often changed by their experience. Having these in mind, it is significant to have
continuous process-oriented approach to reparation that involves corresponding
awareness of public and organizations in term of determining or improving
reparation for the harm inflicted to the victims. It is like having symbolic
reparation which intends to restore the victim’s dignity by acknowledging the harm
done in a transformative way.
III. Comments
IV. Evaluation
Previously the Criminal Justice System has focused mainly on the most
serious cases of domestic violence. Traditionally CJS has its eyes fixed on cases
involving serious injuries that require hospitalization. However it is edifying to
know that through the years, the emphasis has shifted from the traditional to
strategies that include victim-centered approach following the Philippine
adaptation to restorative justice that reinforces the importance of understanding the
victim, the dynamics of victimization and trauma-informed responses.
Over decades and coming from various countries, the major area of concern by the
activists and academicians included the response of Criminal Justice system to
Domestic violence. It can be observe that CJS has gone to drastic change and
reformation over time in dealing with domestic violence. Especially during this
progressive age of technology where information dissemination are far-reaching
and the audience comes from diversity of people.
The new approaches of the criminal justptice system to IPV have changed the way
agencies interact with the public.
The criminal justice system has historically served as the main vehicle in a
community's response to domestic violence. This approach contrasts with other
prevention efforts that seek to reduce the harmful consequences of an act of
violence after it has occurred, or to prevent further acts of violence from occurring
once violence has been identified. Primary prevention relies on identification of the
underlying, or “upstream”, risk and protective factors for intimate-partner violence
and/or sexual violence, and action to address those factors. Its aim is to reduce
rates of intimate partner violence and sexual violence.
VI. Recommendation