Volumetric Analysis
Volumetric Analysis
net/publication/335101732
CITATIONS READS
0 4,588
1 author:
SEE PROFILE
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
All content following this page was uploaded by Ruba Fahmi Abbas on 10 August 2019.
Al-Mustansiriya University
Collage of Science
Department of Chemistry
Edited by
Ruba Fahmi Abbas
Supervised by
1
2
Rules for the handing of reagents and solutions:-
3. Hold stoppers of reagent bottles between the fingers, stoppers should never be set on
the desk top.
4. Unless specifically directed to the country, never return any excess reagent or solution
to a bottle. The minor saving represented by the return of an excess is overshadowed by
the risk of contaminating the entire bottle.
5. Again, unless specifically directed otherwise, do not insert spoons, spatulas, or knives
into a bottle containing a solid chemical. Instead, shake the capped these are used
wherever possible in analytical work. Some suppliers label their products with the
maximum limits of impurity allowed by these specifications, other print the actual results
of analyses for the various impurities.
Quantitative Analysis:-
3
mmol standard solution = mmol unknown solution
M1 * V1 = M2 * V2
4
Primary standard solutions:-
Primary standard solutions are used in analytical chemistry. Including dissolving, a
primary standard is typically a reagent which can be weighed easily, and which is so
pure that its weight is truly representative of the number of moles of substance contained.
Features of a primary standard include:
1//Acid–base titration:-It is acid react with base to obtain salt and water:-
5
Indicator color
Procedure:-
1. Preparing (50 ml) 0.1 M HCl Solution:38 % HCL shows density 1.19 g/mL
and we can find M by next : -
sp.gr * % * 1000
M=
M.wt
Calculate the volume of HCl (conc.):- We must dilute it to preparing 0.1 M HCl in 50 ml
from next: (M* V) conc. = (M * V) dilute
M * V ml = 0.1 * 50 ml
6
Transfer V ml by cylinder to clean and dry beaker containing 30 ml D.W, transfer the
solution to volumetric flask capacity 50 ml, and complete the volume to the mark by D.W.
2. Preparing (50 ml) 0.1 M Na2CO3 Solution:-calculate amount from sodium carbonate
for prepare 0.1 M in 50 ml -
Wt.(gm)
M= * 1000
M.Wt. V(ml)
Wt. =0.53 gm
Weigh 0.53 gm. from Na2CO3 in clean and dry beaker and dilute in 30 ml D.W, transfer
solution to volumetric flask capacity 50 ml and complete the volume to the mark by D.W.
(M * V) HCl = (M * V) Na2CO3 * 1
2
( M * V burette) = ( 0.1 * 5) * 12
Discussion:-
7
2. Calculate the volume of conc. HCl required for preparing 250 ml 0.1 M?
3. Calculate the weight of Na2CO3 required for preparing 100 ml 0.1 M?
4. Why is sodium carbonate primary solution?
5. Why standard solution should be colorless?
6. Why is HCl not primary solution?
7. What is the titration?
Experiment No.(2):- P reparation and standardization of 0.1 N sodium
hydroxide solution using Direct Titration
Theory:- Potassium hydrogen phthalate, often called simply KHP, is an acidic salt
Compound. It forms white powder, colorless crystals; it is solid and air-stable, making
it easy to weigh accurately. KHP is a useful standard for NaOH and Total Organic
Carbon (TOC) testing. Most TOC analyzers are based on the oxidation of organics to
carbon dioxide and water, with subsequent quantization of the carbon dioxide.
This experiment demonstrates the most common method for obtaining standard
solutions for titrimetric analysis. It involves preparation of a solution that has the
Approximate concentration desired determination of the concentration by direct
titration against a primary standard. We will standardize the 0.1 N NaOH solution
(the titrant) with potassium hydrogen phthalate (KHP, KC8H4O4H) using
phenolphthalein as the indicator. KHP is a weak acid and reacts with base in the
following way:-
Procedure:-
Wt.(gm) 1000
N= *
Eq.wt. V(ml)
Weigh 1.02 gm from KHP and dilute in 30 ml D.W, transfer solution to volumetric flask
capacity 50 ml and complete the volume to the mark by D.W.
8
2. Preparation (50 ml) 0.1 N NaOH :-
Wt.(gm) 1000
N= *
Eq.wt. V(ml)
Weigh 0.2 gm from NaOH and dilute in 30 ml D.W, transfer solution to volumetric flask
capacity 50 ml and complete the volume to the mark by D.W.
Wt.
Eq.Wt * 1000 = ( N * V) KHP
Wt. V1 * V2 * V3
* 1000 = 0.1 *
40
3
Wt.
% NaOH = * 100
Wt. of sample
Discussion:-
9
Experiment No (3):- Determination of Acetic Acid Content of Vinegar
Theory:- Determination of acetic acid concentration in commercially available white
vinegar is one of the simplest and easiest titrations. It is also possible to determine
concentration of acetic acid in other types of vinegar. The only problem is that the color
of the vinegar can make it difficult to spot the end point. However, in most cases even
vinegars made of red wine - after being diluted for titration - are pale enough so that the
phenolphthalein color at the end point can be easily spotted.
Vinegar can have different strengths. Most popular are concentrations between 4% and
15% In case of such concentrated solutions it may be impossible to simply take a single
sample for titration. We won't be able to measure such a volume of liquid with
reasonable accuracy, thus we are forced to dilute the original acid.
Colorless Red
Procedure:-
0
mole NaOH
m mol NaOH = m mol CH3COOH * mole CH COOH
3
Wt.
(M *Vburette ) NaOH = * 1000 * 1
M.Wt 1
Wt. CH3COOH
Wt.% CH3COOH in vingar = *100
V V of sample (vingar)
Discussion:-
Theory:-Acids are present in wine in many forms, but the largest percentage of acidity
comes from three primary types of acid: Tartaric acid, Malic acid, Citric acid. The chart
below provides guidelines for acidity based on the type of wine you are making.
Individual tastes vary, of course, so the information shown are recommendations only:-
Wt.
0.1 * V = *1000
Eq. Wt.
Discussion:-
1. What is the formula of tartaric acid, malic acid and citric acid?
2. What are the primary types of acid in wines?
3. Why choice the ph.ph indicator?
Experiment No.(5):- Determination of Malic acid in Tomatoes
Theory:- The type of acid is found in tomato sauce is mostly Citric acid
and Malic acid at a 1 to 0.6 ratio respectively in the ripe red fruit. In the
green fruit the ratio is 1 to 1.3 Malic acid is an organic compound with
the formula HO2CCH2CHOHCO2H. It is a dicarboxylic acid which is
made by all living organisms, contributes to the pleasantly sour taste of
fruits, and is used as a food additive.
Procedure :-
1. Use a clean and dry safety pipette. Draw up 10 ml of tomato sauce and discharge it
into a 50 ml volumetric flask, and complete the volume to the mark with D.W.
2. Transfer the solution to the conical flask, Add 3 drops of phenolphthalein indicator.
3. Titrate with standard 0.1 N NaOH until the color changes from colorless to pink
Calculation: Express the acidity of the tomatoes sauce as percent (w/v) Malic acid
C4H6O5 (fw= 134.09):-
Wt.
0.1 * V = *1000
Eq.Wt.
Discussion:-
hexa amine compound is weak base titrate with standard solution is NaOH.
Procedure:-
1. Weigh accurately 1 gm from ammonium chloride.
2. Dissolve salt in 100 ml D.W and transfer to conical flask capacity 200 ml, and
complete the volume to the mark.
3. Transfer 5 ml from solution, with a pipette, to a conical flask. Capacity 300 ml.
4. Add 25 ml from D.W with a pipette.
5. Add 3 -4 drops from ph.ph indicator, and titrate the solution against (0.1 N NaOH), till
the color change to pink.
6. Repeat the experiment three times and tabulate your results then take the mean of the
three readings.
Calculations:-Calculate the normality and % of ammonium chloride:-
(N * V)NaOH = (N * V) NH4Cl
Wt.
Wt. % NH3 = *100
Wt. Wt. of sample
Discussion:-
1. What is Ammonia?
2. What is hexa amine compound?
3. What is the different between ammonia and ammonium hydroxide?
Experiment No.(7):- Determination of the relative molecular mass of an
organic acid
Theory:- Many of the common carboxylic acids are readily soluble in water and can be
titrated with sodium hydroxide or potassium hydroxide solutions. For sparingly soluble
organic acids the necessary solution can be achieved by using a mixture of ethanol and
water as solvent. But for determinations carried out in aqueous solutions it is not
normally possible to differentiate easily between the end points for the individual
carboxylic acid groups in diprotic acids, such as succinic acid, as the dissociation
constants are too close together. In these cases the end points for titrations with sodium
4
hydroxide correspond to neutralization of all the acidic groups. As some organic acids
can be obtained in very high states of purity, sufficiently sharp end points can be
obtained to justify their use as standards,e.g. benzoic acid and succinic acid.
The titration procedure described in this section can be used to determine the relative
molecular mass (R.M.M.) of a pure carboxylic acid (if the number of acidic groups is
known) or the purity of an acid of known R.M.M.
Procedure:-
1. Weigh out accurately about 4 g of the pure organic acid, dissolve it in the minimum
volume of water (Note 1), or 1:1 (v/v) ethanol/water mixture, and transfer the solution to
a 250 mL graduated flask.
2. Ensure the solution is homogeneous and make up to the required volume. Use a
pipette to measure out accurately a 25 mL aliquot and transfer to a 250 mL conical flask.
3. Using two drops of phenolphthalein solution as indicator titrate with standard 0.2M
(approx.) sodium hydroxide solution (Note 2) until the colorless solution becomes faintly
pink.
4. Repeat with further 25 mL volumes of the acid solution until two results in agreement
are obtained.
1000 W * P
R.M.M =
10 V * M
Where:-
W= is the weight of the acid taken,
P= is the number of carboxylic acid groups,
M= is the molarity of the sodium hydroxide.
V= is the volume of sodium hydroxide used, and
**Notes. (1) In order to obtain sharp end points all de-ionized water used should be
carbon-dioxide-free, as far as is possible.
(2) Volumes of 0.2M sodium hydroxide required will normally be in the range from
about 15 mL to 30 mL depending upon the nature of the organic acid being
determined.
Discussion:-
1. What is the difference between R.M.M and molecular weight?
2. Why does the titration taken in (1:1) ethanol: water medium?
3. Write equation to express this titration?
Experiment No.(8):- Determination of the equivalent weight of a weak
acid
Theory:- The equivalent weight of an acid, which is an aid in establishing it is identity,
is readily determined by titrating a weighed quantity of the purified acid with standard
sodium hydroxide.
Procedure:-
M.Wt of acid
Eq. Wt. of acid =
no. of proton (H+)
**note: acids with limited solubility in water may dissolve more readily in ethanol
or an ethanol-water mixture. The alcohol may be measurably acidic and should be
rendered faintly alkaline to ph.ph before it is used as a solvent. As excess of
standard base, the excess being determined by back-titration with standard acid.
Discussion:-
1. The weight of H2C2O4 is 0.5 gm dissolved in 100 ml D.W, what the normality of
H2C2O4?
2. What are the Eq. Wt of acetic acid, H2SO4, oxalic acid and H3PO4?
3. What are the Eq. Wt. of malic acid, tartaric acid and arsenic acid?
6
Experiment No.(9):- Back titration
Theory:- Direct titration involves the direct and stepwise addition of a standard titrant to
the analyte whilst the back titration involves reacting a standard excess titrant with an
analyte solution of an unknown concentration, then reacting the excess (left over) titrant
with an analyte of known concentration to determine the concentration of excess titrant.
While In back titration we use two reagents (standard solution) - one, that reacts with
the original sample (let's call it A, first standard solution ), and second (lets call it B ,
second standard solution), that reacts with the first reagent, We add precisely measured
amount of reagent A to sample and once the reaction ends we titrate excess reagent A left
with reagent B. Knowing initial amount of reagent A and amount that was left after the
reaction (from titration) we can easily calculate how much reagent A was used for the
first reaction. In this test, we want to find normality for nitric acid, so we added excess
amount from NaOH , and the excess amount from NaOH back titration with standard
solution like HCl.
Procedure:-
1. Transfer 5 ml volume of the nitric acid solution to a conical flask.
2. Transfer 7 ml volume of the 0.1 N NaOH solutions to the same conical flask.
3. Add one or two drops of ph.ph to this solution and complete the titration with (0.1 N
HCl) comes from the burette until the color change from pink to colorless.
4. Repeat the experiment three times and tabulate your results then take the mean of the
three readings.
1. Weigh out accurately about 3.6 g of the washing-soda crystals, dissolve in water, and
make up to 250 mL in a graduated flask. Mix thoroughly.
106.01 2 x 36.46
The percentage of Na2CO3 can then be calculated from the known weight of washing
soda employed. A simpler and more general procedure is illustrated by the following
example.
Discussion:-
1. 0.2 g of NaOH pellets were placed in a 50mL volumetric flask and diluted to
the mark with distilled water to make an approximate 0.1M solution.
2. 25 mL of each cold, fresh soda was measured in a graduated cylinder.
3. The sample was then placed in a beaker
4. 5 drops of Methyl orange indicator was added to the solution
5. The solution was titrated with NaOH until Color of this indicator changes from
yellow to orange to red at pH between 3.1 and 4.4.
Calculations:-Calculate the normality of diprotic acid in soda:-
N * 25 = 0.1 * V burette
Discussion:-
While that between HCl(aq) and NaOH(aq) completes in only one step:-
Reactions (1) and (3) can be indicated by phenolphthalein and that of reaction (2) can
be indicated by methyl orange.
Reaction 1 and 3 Evidenced by the first equivalence point between standard solution
and both of OH- and half CO3-2 by using Ph.Ph. indicator, Directory where the color
changes from red to colorless. For The remaining half from CO3-2 , added to solution
M.O indicator and complete titration with HCl , the color change from yellow to pink
and we can see that in reaction (2).
In another method the total alkali (carbonate + hydroxide) is determined by titration with
standard acid, using methyl orange as indicator. In a second portion of solution the
carbonate is precipitated with a slight excess of barium chloride solution, and, without
filtering, the solution is titrated with standard acid using Ph.Ph as indicator. The latter
titration gives the hydroxide content, and by subtracting this from the first titration, the
Volume of acid required for the carbonate is obtained:-
0
Procedure:-
1. Transfer 5 ml volume of the mixture solution, with a pipette, to a conical flask then
add one or two drops of Ph.PH to this solution and titrate with ( 0.1N HCl) come from
the burette gradually with continuous swirling of the solution in the conical flask and
near the end point, the acid is added drop by drop. Continue the addition of the acid until
the color of the solution passes from red to colorless, record the volume for acid as V1.
2. add one or two drops of methyl orange to this solution and complete the titration
with ( 0.1 N HCl) come from the burette until the color change from yellow to pink ,
record the volume for acid as V2.
3. Repeat the experiment three times and tabulate your results then take the mean of the
three readings.
Calculations:-A-Calculate the normality and percentages of OH- in mixture:-
(N * V) HCl = (N * V) NaOH
N *Eq.Wt
% NaOH = * 100
Wt. of Sample
N *Eq.Wt
% Na2CO3 = * 100
Wt. of Sample
Discussion:-
1.What is the caustic soda?
2.What is double titration?
3.Why ph.ph indicator used first?
4. Why After addition barium chloride we just use ph.ph indicator ?
B:-Determination carbonate and bicarbonate in mixture:-
Sodium bicarbonate or sodium hydrogen carbonate is the chemical compound with the
formula Na HCO3. Sodium bicarbonate is a white solid that is crystalline but often
appears as a fine powder, the salt has many related names such as baking soda, bread
soda, cooking soda, and bicarbonate of soda.
This experiment Consider a mixture of carbonate and bicarbonate are titrating with
standard solution (0.1 N HCl) by using ph.ph and methyl orange as indicator , after
adding ph.ph indicator half of carbonate converted to bicarbonate, but after adding
M.O indicator the bicarbonate and half of carbonate converted to H2CO3 . The H2CO3
Disintegrate to CO2 and H2O.
NaHCO3 H2CO3
+ 2HCl + 2NaCl
NaHCO3 H2CO3
pH=8.4 yellow
pH=4.4 pink
Procedure:-
1. Transfer 5 ml volume of the mixture solution, with a pipette, to a conical flask then
add one or two drops of Ph. Ph to this solution and titrate with ( 0.1 N HCl) come from
the burette gradually with continuous swirling of the solution in the conical flask and
near the end point, the acid is added drop by drop. Continue the addition of the acid until
the color of the solution passes from red to colorless, record the volume for acid as V1.
2. add one or two drops of methyl orange to this solution and complete the titration
with ( 0.1 N HCl) come from the burette until the color change from yellow to pink ,
record the volume for acid as V2.
3. Repeat the experiment three times and tabulate your results then take the mean of the
three readings
Calculations:-
N *Eq.Wt
% NaHCO3 = * 100
Wt. of Sample
N *Eq.Wt
% Na2CO3 = * 100
Wt. of Sample
Discussion:-
1. What is Sodium bicarbonate? What is the basicity difference between NaHCO3 and
NaOH?
2. What is the difference between V1 and V2 in experiment A and experiment B?
3. Calculate the conc. Of Na2CO3 and NaHCO3 by ppm?
Experiment No.(13):-Determination of bicarbonate in blood by back
titration
Theory:- About 95% of the total carbon dioxide in human blood exists as HCO3-, the
remainder existing as dissolved CO2. The HCO3- concentration, for most clinical work,
can be used as a diagnostic aid. It is determined by adding an excess of 0.01 M HC1, to
volatilize the HCO3- as CO2, swirling to allow the CO2 to escape, and then back-titrating
the excess HC1 with 0.01 M NaOH. The 0.01 M HCI and, NaOH solutions are prepared
by diluting standardized 0.1 M solutions.
The work:-
4
2. Preparation of comparison solution. Prepare a standard for color comparison at the end
point as follows. Place 6 mL of 1% saline solution in a 25-ml conical flask and add 0.10
mL serum or plasma. Add two drops phenol red indicator, insert a stopper, and rotate
gently to mix the contents. The transition range of this indicator is pH 8.4 to 6.7 (yellow
to red). Because of the buffering capacity of the blood, the end point occurs in this range.
3. Titration of the sample. The pooled serum or plasma sample will have been prepared
by touching the end of a stirring rod and rotating it in the pooled sample. This will
prevent excess foaming when the sample is swirled. Place 0.100 mL of serum or plasma
a in a 25-mL Erlenmeyer.
Note: This determination may be performe d on a macro scale using 5.00 mL acid and 1.00 mL
sample, or using2.00 mL acid and 0.500 mL sample. In the former case, the back-titration will
require about 2.4 mL of 0.01M NaOH, and in the latter case, about 0.7 mL. Flask and add 1.00
mL of 0.01 M HC1 and 4 mL of 1% saline. Swirl the flask vigorously for at least 1 mm to allow
the CO2 to escape. Add two drops of indicator and then titrate with 0.01 M NaOH drop wise, but
rapidly, until a pink color matching the standard persists for at least 15 S. The NaOH may be
added carefully with a graduated 1-mL measuring pipet and read to the nearest 0.01 mL.
The normal value of blood bicarbonate is about 26 meq/L (25 to 32 meqlL), or 0.026 me q/mL.
Meq HCO3 = mmol HCO3 . Since 0.1 mL blood was taken for analysis, it should consume about
0.0026 mmol HC1, or 0.26 mL of 0.01 M HCI. Hence, since 1 mL of 0.01 M HC1 was taken, about
0.74 mL should re main unreacted, and the back-titration should take about 0.7 mL of 0.01 M
NaOH.
Discussion:-
Procedure:-
1-Standardization of silver nitrate solution:-Sodium chloride has a relative molecular
mass of 58.44. A 0.05 M solution is prepared by weighing out 0.29 g of the pure dry salt
and dissolving it in 50 mL of water in a volumetric flask.
Wt. 1000
N= *
Eq.Wt. V (ml)
Wt. * 1000
0.05 =
169 50
Weigh X g of AgNO3 in dry and clean beaker then transfer to 50 ml volumetric flask
and complete the volume to the mark with D.W.
3. Transfer 5 ml volume of the(0.02 N NaCl) solution, with a pipette, to a conical flask.
Capacity 300 ml.
4. Add 4-5 drops of potassium chromate indicator K2CrO4 to this solution.
5. Add (0.05 N AgNO3) from the burette gradually with continuous swirling of the
solution in the conical flask and near the end point, AgNO3 is added drop by drop.
Continue the addition of AgNO3 until appears red Precipitate.
6
6. Repeat step 2 three time to take the average of volume (V).
7. Find the error of titration process by Transfer 5 ml volume of the D.W, with a pipette,
to a conical flask. capacity 300 ml, add 4-5 drops of potassium chromate indicator
K2CrO4 to this solution, Add (0.05 N AgNO3) from the burette gradually with
continuous swirling of the solution in the conical flask and near the end point, AgNO3
is added drop by drop. Continue the addition of AgNO3 until upper red Precipitate
appears, Recorded the volume (V1).
Calculations :-Calculate the normality of Cl-:-
(N * V)NaCl = (N * V) AgNO3
(N * 5) = (0.05 *V -V1)
conc.(gm/L)Cl- = N * Eq.Wt
Discussion:-
The indicator Fe3+ (ferric ion) are then added and the solution is titrated with the
potassium thiocyanate solution. The titrate remains pale yellow as the excess (unreacted)
silver ions react with the thiocyanate ions to form a silver thiocyanate precipitate.
Once all the silver ions have reacted, the slightest excess of thiocyanate reacts with Fe3+ to
form a dark red complex.
Fe3+(aq) + SCN -(aq) [FeSCN]2+(aq)
Procedure:-
1. Weigh 0.2 mg NaCl or KCl, Transfer to a conical flask capacity 250 ml and Dissolve
in 50 ml D.W.
2. Added 5-6 drops (6N HNO3).
3. Added 2 ml nitrobenzene.
4. Add excess (V1 ml) 0.05 N AgNO3 by pipette.
5. Add to the conical flask 2 ml from (mohrs salt) Ferric ammonium sulfate solution
NH4Fe (SO4)2.12H2O, and titrate with 0.05 N potassium thiocyanate KSCN until upper
red/ bloody color appears, Record the volume (V2).
Wt.
*1000 = (N * V) - (N * V)
Eq.Wt
Wt.
*1000 = (0.05 * V1 pipette)
- (0.05 * V2 burette)
35.40
Wt. Cl-
%Cl - = * 100
Wt. sample
Wt.
= *100
0.2 g
Discussion:-
1. What is back titration?
2. Why nitro benzene is added?
3. What is indicator in this test?
4. Why the nitric acids are added?
5. What is the other name of this method?
Experiment No.(16):- Determination of Chloride by Fajan’s method
(Adsorption indictors)
Theory:-In Fajan method, the end point is detected with a dye that imparts a distinctive
color to the silver chloride precipitate. Dichlorofluorescein or Fluorescein (HIn) is
commonly used as indicator. As the surface equivalence point is approached and passed,
silver ion will become the primary adsorbed the surface of precipitate. The negatively
charged dichlorofluorescein or Fluorescein anion (In-) will then on displaces the nitrate
ion to become the countering. On being adsorbed, its electronic changes so that it
reflects reddish /pink light rather than yellow-green, this signals the end point.
Procedure:-
1. Transfer 25 ml volume of the NaCl or KCl solution, with a pipette, to a conical flask.
2. Add 5-10 drops Dichlorofluorescein or Fluorescein and 0.1 gm dextrin solution. The
color of solution becomes yellow-green.
3. Add 0.0.5 M AgNO3 from the burette gradually with continuous swirling of the
solution in the conical flask and near the end point, AgNO3 is added drop by drop.
Continue the addition of AgNO3 until appears reddish Precipitate
Calculations:-Calculate the molarity of chloride:-
(M * V)Cl- = (M * V) AgNO3
Calculate PCl:- PCl = - Log [Cl-]
-
Discussion:-
Procedure:-
2. Add about 1 g of moist aluminum hydroxide gel, and shake well at five-minute
intervals for about 20 minutes. Filter through a Whatman No. 40 filter paper, pouring
the first running's back through the filter if necessary, to ensure a clear filtrate.
5. Prepare the indicator solutions for the main titration by dissolving separately 5
g hydrated iron (III) nitrate in 100 mL of distilled water and filtering, and 0.08 g
sodium thiocyanate in 100 mL of distilled water.
0
volume of mercury (II) nitrate solution equivalent to 10.0 mL of the sodium
tetraphenylborate solution.
7. Pipette 25.0 mL of the potassium ion solution (about 10mg K+) into a 50 mL
graduated flask; add 0.5 mL 1 M nitric acid and mix. Introduce 20.0 mL of the sodium
tetraphenylborate solution, dilute to the mark, mix, and then pour the mixture into a
150 mL flask provided with a ground stopper. Shake the stoppered flask for 5 minutes
on a mechanical shaker to coagulate the precipitate, and then filter most of the solution
through a dry Whatman No. 40 filter paper into a dry beaker. Transfer 25.0 mL of the
filtrate into a 250 mL conical flask and add 75 mL of water, l.0mL of iron (III) nitrate
solution, and 1.0mL of sodium thiocyanate solution. Titrate with the mercury(II)
nitrate solution as described above.
**Note. This determination is only suitable for students with analytical experience and should
not be attempted by beginners.
Calculation:-
(M *V) = (M * V) - ( M * V)
Discussion:-
Wt.
* 1000 = M *V
A. Wt.
Wt.
* 1000 = 0.1 *V burette
A. Wt.
Wt. Ag
% Ag in Alloy = *1000
Wt. of sample
Discussion:-
3. Ag common with two metal in uses, what the other two metals?
2NaS2O3 + I2 starch
Na2S4O6 + 2NaI
The number of moles of iodine produced= the number of moles of dissolved oxygen
in freshwater.
Procedure:-A-Reagents:-
3. Add a few drops of starch solution and Titrate with 0.025M Na2S2O3⋅5H2O
solution; continue titration to first disappearance of blue color.
Calculations:-Calculate the conc. of D.O by ppm:-
DO as mg / L = ml of Na2S2O3.5H2O × 2
Discussion:-
1. What is the Winkler Method?
2. What are the redox indicators?
3. What is the Dissolved oxygen?
4. What the advantage is of applied this experiment?
4
Experiment No.(20):-Determination of available chloride in
hypochlorite
Theory:-Most hypochlorite's are normally obtained only in solution, but calcium
hypochlorite exists in the solid form in commercial bleaching powder which consists
essentially of a mixture of calcium hypochlorite Ca(OC1)2 and the basic chloride
CaC12,Ca(OH)2,H2O; some free slaked lime is usually present. The active constituent
is the hypochlorite, which is responsible for the bleaching action. Upon treating
bleaching powder with hydrochloric acid, chlorine is liberated: OCl - + Cl- + 2H+ =
C12 + H2O
The available chlorine refers to the chlorine liberated by the action of dilute acids on
the hypochlorite, and is expressed as the percentage by weight in the case of bleaching
powder. Commercial bleaching powder contains 36-38 per cent of available chlorine.
Two methods are in common use for the determination of the available chlorine. In the
first, the hypochlorite solution or suspension is treated with an excess of a solution of
potassium iodide, and strongly acidified with acetic acid:
1. Weigh out accurately about 5.0 g of the bleaching powder into a clean glass
mortar. Add a little water, and rub the mixture to a smooth paste. Add a little more
water, titration with the pestle, allow the mixture to settle, and pour off the milky
liquid into a 500 mL graduated flask.
2. Grind the residue with a little more water, and repeat the operation until the
whole of the sample has been transferred to the flask either in solution or in a state of
very fine suspension, and the mortar washed quite clean.
3. The flask is then filled to the mark with distilled water, well shaken, and 50.0
mL of the turbid liquid immediately withdrawn with a pipette. This is transferred to a
250 mL conical flask, 25 mL of water added, followed by 2 g of iodate-free potassium
iodide (or 20 mL of a 10 per cent solution) and 10 mL of glacial acetic acid.
4. Titrate the liberated iodine with standard 0.1M sodium thiosulphate solution.
Calculation:-
Wt.
* 1000 = N * V
At. Wt.
Wt. Cl2
% Cl2 = * 100
Wt. sample
Discussion:-
6
reacts with excess KI to produce I2, as shown in the equation below:
IO3− + 5 I– + 6 H3 O+ → 3 I2 + 9 H2 O
And titrate with the Na2S2O3 solution with starch indicator until the color change from
blue to colorless. I2 + 2 S2O32− → S4 O62- + 2 I-
The principal reaction is the reduction of iodine to iodide by thiosulfate, it is called
iodometric titration.
Procedure:-
1. Boil 250 ml of distilled H2O for several minutes, and then cool, for killing
bacteria.
2. Weigh 5 gm Na2S2O3•5H2O, add to 200 ml the boiled water. 0.5 gm Na2CO3
and store the solution in the dark a bottle, This solution will not be stable for more
than one week.
3. Weigh out approximately 0.15 g KIO3. Quantitatively transfer to a 300-mL
volumetric flask and dilute with 50 ml D.W., add 2 g KI and 10 mL of (1M HCl)
4. Fill the burette with Na2S2O3 solution and slowly titrate until the solution is pale
yellow. At this point, add 3-5 mL of starch solution and continue adding titrant
dropwise until the blue dark color just disappears.
Calculations:-
m eq Na2S2O3 = m eq KIO3
(N * V)Na2S2O3 = (N * Vburette)KIO3
Wt. of Na2S2O3
1000 * = (N * V) KIO3
Eq.Wt
Wt.
% Na2S2O3 = * 100
Wt. of sample
Discussion:-
1. Why is sodium carbonate used in the preparation of the sodium thiosulfate
solution?
2. What is the Iodometry?
3. Why is Boiling water before using it?
4. Is sodium thiosulfate primary standard solution? Why?
5. What is the difference between Iodimetry and Iodometry?
6. What is the difference between redox agent and oxidant agent?
Rather than titrating directly with iodine, a known excess of iodine will be generated
directly in the solution with the ascorbic acid, according to the following reaction:
Discussion:-
1. What is back-titration?
2. What is the L-ascorbic acid?
3. Why do you add oxalic acid to the stock solution of the vitamin C?
Experiment No.(23):-Iiodometric determination of copper in copper
sulfate
Theory:- Pure copper is used as a primary standard for sodium thiosulfate and is
recommended when the thiosulfate is to be used for the determination of copper. Upon
addition of excess iodide to a solution of Cu (II), a precipitate of CuI is formed along
with I2. The liberated iodine is then titrated with standard sodium thiosulfate.
2 Cu2+ + 4 I- 2 CuI(s) + I2
I2 + 2 S2 O3-2 2 I- + S4O6-2
Procedure:-
1. Weigh 0.6 gm CuSO4. 5H2O.
2. Dissolve in 25 ml D.W.
3. Added 2 ml (5N HCl)
4. Transfer the solution to the conical flask capacity 300 ml and add 75 ml D.W.
5. Add a 5 ml of starch solution and Titrate with 0.025M Na2S2O3⋅5H2O solution,
continue titration to first disappearance of blue color
6. Add 1 gm NH4SCN or KSCN. Mix well; if the blue color return again, adds
another amount from sodium thiosulphate till the white precipitate is appear.
7. Repeat step 7 and 8 three time.
Calculations:-Calculate the Rate percentages for Cu in salt:-
m eq CuSO4 = m eq Na2S2O3
(N * V) CuSO4 = (N * V) Na2S2O3
Wt. of Cu in salt
1000 * = (N *V )Na2S2O3
eq.Wt
Wt Cu in CuSO4
% Cu in CuSO4 = * 100
Wt. of Sample
0
Experiment No.(24):- Determination of Copper in Brass
Theory:- Brass (alloy) contains amounts of tin, lead, and zinc (and perhaps minor
amount of nickel and iron). The method is relatively simple and applicable to brasses
with less than 2% iron.
A weighed sample is treated with nitric acid, which causes the tin to precipitate as a
hydrated oxide of uncertain composition evaporation with sulfuric acid to the appearance
of sulfur trioxide eliminates the excess nitrate, redissolves the tin compound, and
possibly causes the formation of lead sulfate. The pH is adjusted amount of phosphoric
acid. An excess of potassium iodide is added, and the liberated iodine is titrated with
standard thiosulfate.
Procedure:-
1. If so directed, free the metal of foils by treated with an organic solvent, heat in an oven to
drive off the solvent.
2. Weight 0.1-0.3 mg sample into 250 ml conical flask, and introduce 5 ml of 6M HNO3 into
each.
3. Warm (HOOD) until solution is complete, add 10 ml of conc. H2SO4, and evaporate
(HOOD) until copious white fumes of SO3 are given off.
4. Allow the mixture to cool, cautiously add 30 ml of D.W, boil for 1-2 min, and again cool.
5. Add conc. NH3 dropwise and with thorough mixing to produce the intensely blue Cu
(NH3)4+2, the solution should smell faintly of ammonia (note).
6. Add with dropwise 3M H2SO4 until the color of the complex just disappear s , and then add
2 ml of 85% H3PO4. Cool to room temperature.
7. Treat each sample individually from this point on to minimize the air-oxidation of iodide
ion. Add 4 g of KI to the sample, and titrate with Na2S2O3 until the solution becomes pale
yellow.
8. Add 5 ml of starch indicator, and continue the titration until the blue color becomes faint.
Add 2 g of KSCN; swirl vigorously for 30 s. complete the titration, using the disappearance of
the blue starch/ I2 color as the end point.
Note: vapors should not be sniffed directly from the flask but instead should be wafted
toward the nose with a waving motion of one's hand.
Calculation:-
Wt. a
* 1000 = ( M * V) * b
At. Wt.
Wt.
Cu % = * 1000
Wt. sample
Discussion:-
Procedure:-
1. Weigh out accurately about 2.5 g of finely powdered mercury (II) chloride, and
dissolve it in 100 mL of water in a graduated flask.
2. Shake well. Transfer 25.0 mL of the solution to a conical flask; add 25 mL water, 2
mL 1M hydrochloric acid, and excess of 50 per cent phosphorous (III) acid solution.
3. Stir thoroughly and allow standing for 12 hours or more. Filter the precipitated
mercury (I) chloride through a quantitative filter paper and wash the precipitate
moderately with cold water.
4. Transfer the precipitate with the filter paper quantitatively to a 250 mL reagent bottle;
add 30 mL concentrated hydrochloric acid, 20 mL water, and 5 mL carbon tetrachloride
or chloroform.
5. Titrate the mixture with standard 0.025M potassium iodate in the usual manner
2HgC12 + H3PO3 + H2O = Hg2C12 + 2HC1 + H3PO4
Calculation:-
Discussion:-
The position of this equilibrium is strongly dependent upon the hydrogen ion
concentration. In order to force the reaction to the right, it is common practice to carry
out the titration in the presence of an excess of sodium hydrogen carbonate, which
consumes the hydrogen ions as they form.
Procedure:-
1. Dry the unknown at 110 oC for 1h, and allow it to cool in a desiccator.
2. Weigh individual samples (note1) into 500 ml conical flask.
3. Introduce 0.3 g of KCl and 10 ml of concentrated HCl to each flask.
4. Heat the mixture (HOOD) just below boiling until only white or slightly gray
residues of SiO2 remain.
5. Add 3 g of tartaric acid to each sample and heat for an additional 10 to 15 min.
6. With swirling, add water (note2) from a pipet or burette until the volume is about 100
ml.
7. If reddish Sb2S3 form, discontinue dilution and heat further to eliminate H2S,add
more HCl if necessary.
8. Add 3 drops of ph.ph indicator, and neutralize with 6 M NaOH to the first faint pink
of the indicator.
9. Discharge the color by the dropwise addition of 6 M HCl, and then add 1 ml in
excess.
10. Introduce 4 -5 g of NaHCO3 , taking care to avoid losses of solution by spattering
during the addition.
11. Add 5 ml of starch indicator, rine down the inside of the flask, and titrate with
standard 0.05 M I2 to the first blue color that persists for 30 S.
Note1: samples should contain between 1.5 and 2 mmol of antimony, consult with the instructor
for an appropriate sample size. Weight to the nearest milligram is adequate for samples larger
than 1 g.
Note2: the slow addition of water, with efficient stirring, is essential to prevent the formation of
SbOCl.
Calculation:-
a
mmol Sb = mmol I2 * b
Wt.
a
At. Wt. * 1000 = ( M * V) * b
Wt. Sb * 100
% Sb =
Wt. sample
Discussion:-
4
adequately protected from evaporation. Potassium dichromate is used only in acid
solution, and is reduced rapidly at the ordinary temperature to a green chromium (III)
salt. It is not reduced by cold hydrochloric acid. Potassium dichromate is therefore of
particular value in the determination of iron in iron ores: the ore is usually dissolved in
hydrochloric acid, the iron (III) reduced to iron (II), and the solution then titrated with
standard dichromate solution: Cr2O7 -2+ 6Fe+2 +14H+ = 2Cr+3 + 6Fe+3 +7H2O
Procedure:-
1. With metallic iron. Use iron wire of 99.9 per cent assay value (Note 1). Insert a well-
fitting rubber stopper provided with a bent delivery tube into a 500 mL conical flask and
clamp the flask in a retort stand in an inclined position, the tube being so bent as to dip
into a small beaker containing saturated sodium hydrogen carbonate solution or 20 per
cent potassium hydrogen carbonate solution (prepared from the solids) .
3. And add 0.5-1 g sodium hydrogen carbonate in two portions; the carbon dioxide
produced will drive out the air. Meanwhile, weigh out accurately about 0.2 g of iron
wire, place it quickly into the flask, replace the stopper and bent tube, and warm gently
until the iron has dissolved completely. Cool the flask rapidly under a stream of cold
water, with the delivery tube still dipping into the solution in the beaker (Note 2).
4. Titrate the cooled solution immediately with the dichromate solution, using either
sodium diphenylamine sulphonate or N-phenylanthranilic acid as indicator. If the former
is selected, add 6-8 drops of the indicator, followed by 5 mL of syrupy phosphoric (V)
acid: titrate slowly with the dichromate solution, stirring well, until the pure green colour
changes to a grey-green. Then add the dichromate solution drop wise until the first tinge
of blue-violet, which remains permanent on shaking, appears. If the latter indicator is
selected, add 200 mL of 1M sulphuric acid, then 0.5 mL of the indicator; add the
dichromate solution, with shaking until the color changes from green to violet-red (Note
3): 1 mole K2Cr2O7 = 6 moles Fe
**Notes. (1) Iron wire of 99.9 per cent purity is available commercially and is a suitable analytical
standard. If the wire exhibits any sign of rust, it should be drawn between two pieces of fine
emery cloth, and the n wiped with a clean; dry cloth before use.
(2) As the flask cools, the hydrogen carbonate solution is automatically drawn in until the
pressure of the carbon dioxide inside the flask is equal to the atmospheric pressure.
(3) The standardization may also be effected with ethylenediammonium iron (II) sulphate.
Calculation:-
Wt. Fe
% Fe in ore = * 100
Wt. of sample
Discussion:-
Procedure:-
1. Place a 50 mL volume of the water sample in a 250 mL conical flask with a ground-
glass neck which can be fitted with a water condenser for refluxing.
6
5. Add either diphenylamine indicator (1 mL) or ferroin indicator and titrate with
0.025M ammonium iron (II) sulphate solution (Note 3). Diphenylamine gives a color
changes from blue to green at the end-point, whilst that for ferroin is blue-green to red-
brown. Call this titration A mL.
6. Repeat the back-titration for the blank(Titration B mL). The difference between the
two values is the amount of potassium dichromate used up in the oxidation.
Calculation:-The C.O.D. is calculated from the relationship:
(2) The required concentration is obtained by weighing out 1.225 g of potassium dichromate and
diluting to 500 mL with de-ionized water in a graduated flask.
(3) Dissolve 4.9 g of ammonium iron (II) s ulphate heptahydrate in 150 mL of water and add 2.5
mL of concentrated sulphuric acid. Dilute the solution to 500 mL in a graduated flask.
(4) This method gives high results with samples possessing high chloride content due to reaction
between the mercury (II) sulphate and the chloride ions. In these cases the proble m can be
overcome by following a procedure using chromium(III) potassium sulphate, Cr(III)
K(SO4 )2 .12H2 O.
Discussion:-
Theory:-Standardization may also be carried out with sodium oxalate; in this case, an
indirect procedure must be used as the redox indicators are themselves oxidized at the
elevated temperatures which are necessary. The procedure, therefore, is to add an excess
of the cerium (IV) solution, and then, after cooling, the excess is determined by back-
titration with an iron(II) solution. It is possible to carry out a direct titration of the
sodium oxalate if a potentiometric procedure is used.
Procedure:-A:-Potentiometric method:-
Prepare an approximately 0.1 M solution of ammonium iron(II) sulphate in dilute
sulphuric acid and titrate with the cerium(IV) sulphate solution using ferroin indicator.
B-Titrimetric method:-
1. Weigh out accurately about 0.2 g sodium oxalate into a 250 mL conical flask and add
25-30mL 1M sulphuric acid.
2. Heat the solution to about 60°C and then add about 30 mL of the cerium(IV) solution
to be standardized drop wise, adding the solution as rapidly as possible consistent with
drop formation.
3. Re-heat the solution to 60 °C, and then add a further 10 mL of the cerium(IV)
solution. Allow to stand for three minutes, then cool and back-titrate the excess cerium
(IV) with the iron (II) solution using ferroin as indicator.
Calculation:-
A: m Eq Ce+4 = m Eq Fe+2
N * V = N* V
B: m Eq Na2C2O4 = m Eq Ce +4 - m Eq Fe+2
Wt.
* 1000 =(N * V) - ( N * V)
Eq. Wt
Discussion:-
Procedure:-
1. Weigh out accurately about 1.5 g of sodium nitrite and dissolve it in 500 mL of boiled-
out water in a graduated flask.
2. Shake thoroughly. Place 50 mL of standard 0.1M cerium (IV) sulphate in a conical
flask, and add l0 mL of 2M sulphuric acid.
3. Transfer 25 mL of the nitrite solution to this flask by means of a pipette, and keep the
tip of the pipette below the surface of the liquid during the addition.
4. Allow to stand for 5 minutes, and titrate the excess of cerium (IV) sulphate with
standard 0.1M ammonium iron (II) sulphate, using ferroin or N-phenylanthranilic acid as
indicator.
5. Repeat the titration with two further portions of the nitrite solution.
6. Standardize the iron solution by titrating 25 mL of it with the cerium(IV) solution in
the presence of dilute sulphuric acid.
7. Determine the volume of the standard cerium (IV) sulphate solution which has reacted
with the nitrite solution, and there from calculate the purity of the sodium nitrite
employed.
**Note. Cerium (IV) sulphate may also be used for the following analyses.
Hydrogen pe roxide . The diluted solution, which may contain nitric or hydrochloric acid in any
concentration between 0.5 and 3M or sulphuric acid in the concentration range 0.25 to 1.5M, is
titrated directly with standard cerium (IV) sulphate solution, using ferroin or N-phenylanthranilic
acid as indicator. The reaction is: 2Ce +4 + H2 O2 = 2Ce +3 + O2 + 2H+
An excess of a standard solution of iron (II) must therefore be added and the excess back-titrated
with standard cerium (IV) sulphate solution. Erratic results are obtained, depending upon the
exact experimental conditions, because of induced reactions leading to oxidation by air of iron (II)
ion or to decomposition of the persulphate; these induced reactions are inhibited by bromide ion
in concentrations not exceeding 1 M and, under these conditions, the determination may be
carried out in the presence of organic matter.
0
Calculation:-
Wt.
* 1000 = (N * V) - ( N* V)
Eq. Wt.
Wt. of NaNO3
purityvNaNO3 = *100
Wt. of sample
Discussion:-
Aqueous solution of permanganate is not stable because the ion tends to oxidize water:
Procedure:-
Wt. 1000
0.1 = *
Eq.Wt. 50
B-Prepare ( 50 ml) 0.1 N KMNO4:-
Wt. 1000
0.1 = *
Eq.Wt. 50
Weigh 0.6 g KMnO4. Dissolve with D.W in volumetric flask capacity 50 ml. Heat the
solution for one hour, filtrate the solution with glass wool.
C- Standarazation of KMNO4 solution:-
1. Transfer 5 ml from oxalic acid , with pipette, to conical flask capacity 300 ml
2. Add 5 ml dilute sulphuric acid.
3. Heat the mixture on the water bath for 5 min.
4. Titration against KMNO4 until the faint pink color is appear.
5. Repeat step 3 three time.
6. Calculate the normality of permanganate
(N * V) KMNO4 = (N * V )H2C2O4
N* V = 0.1 *5
(N * V) KMNO4 = (N * V )FeSO4
N* V = ? *10
Discussion:-
After the bromination is complete, the excess bromine is determined employing the
procedure used for the standardization.
Procedure:-
1. Transfer a sample containing between 1-1.5 mmol of phenol to 250 ml
volumetric flask, dilute to the mark with water.
2. Pipette 25 ml aliquots of the diluted sample into 250 ml conical flask, and add
25 ml aliquots of standard KBrO3 solution.
3. Add about 1 g of KBr and about 5 ml of 3 M H2SO4 to each flask. Stopper each
flask immediately after acidification to prevent the loss of Br2.mix and let stand for
about 10 min. swirl the solution until the KBr has dissolved.
4. Titrate with standard 0.05 M Na2S2O3 until the solution is pale yellow. Add 5
ml of starch indicator, and complete the titration.
Calculation:-
a
mmol phenol = mmol Na2S2O3 *
b
a
mmol phenol = (M *V)
b
Discussion:-
1. Form which organic compound phenol to be considered?
2. Calculate the normality of 10% KBr solution?
3. Why H2SO4, KBr, KI and KBrO3 are added?
M+n + nL MLn
complex
metal ligand
The coordination number of a cation is the number of covalent bonds that a cation
tends to form with electron donor groups.Titrimetric methods based upon complex
formation.A ligand that has more than two donor group chelating agents are known.
Like EDTA (Ethylene di amine tetra acetic acid)
HOOCH2C
CH2COOH
NCH2CH2N
CH2COOH
HOOCH2C
The use of a metal ion indicator in an EDTA titration may be written as:
4
Experiment No.(33):- Determination of water hardness
Theory:-Water hardness was defined in terms of the capacity of cation in the water to
replace the sodium or potassium in soaps and form sparingly soluble products.
Water hardness determined by an EDTA titration after the sample has been buffered to
pH 10. Mg, which forms the least stable EDTA complex of all of cation in water
sample, is not titrated untile enough reagent has been added to complex all of other
cation in the sample. Therefore, Mg ion indicator such as EBT, can serve as indicator
in water hardness titration. ( Indicator EBT = H3In , EDTA= H4Y).
Procedure:-
1. Dry 3 gm Na2EDTA.2H2O (Na2 H2Y. 2H2O) at 80 C0 for 2 hour, cold in dissector for
30 min.
(M * V)CaCO3 = (M * V)EDTA
Wt.(gm) * 1000
* V(sample) = (M * V) EDTA . ..2
M.Wt(CaCO3) V (ml)
ppm(mg/l) 1
* * V(sample) = (M * V) EDTA
103 M.Wt
Discussion:-
1. Why Mg-EDTA is added?
2. What is the de-ionized water?
3. What is the coordination number?
4. What is the EBT, EDTA, and ligand?
5. How many type of hardness and must be made?
6
Procedure:-
1. Prepare the indicator solution by dissolving 1 g variamine blue in 100 mL de-ionized
water: as already pointed out, variamine blue acts as a redox indicator.
2. Pipette 25 mL iron (III) solution (0.05M) into a conical flask and dilute to 100mL with
de-ionized water.
3. Adjust the pH to 2-3; Congo red paper may be used to the first perceptible color
change.
4. Add 5 drops of the indicator solution, warm the contents of the flask to 40 °C, and
titrate with standard (0.05M) EDTA solution until the initial blue colour of the solution
turns grey just before the end point, and with the final drop of reagent changes to yellow.
This particular titration is well adapted to be carried out potentiometrically.
Calculation:-
(M * V)Fe+3 = (M * V)EDTA
Discussion:-
1. What is the type indicator used?
2. How many donated electron in EDTA molecule?
3. Write chemical equations to express reaction the titration?
4. What is the chemical name of EDTA and it is acidic formula?
Wt. Ni
%Ni in Alloy = * 100
Wt. sample
Discussion:-
1. Why the EDTA does react with Ni but not with Fe+3?
2. What do you mean be the selective reaction (titration or determination)?
3. What is the type of indicator used in this titration?
4. Why CaCl2 ,HCl , and tri ethanol amine are added?
5. Write balance equation to express the titration reaction?
Experiment No.(36):-Determination of lead and tin in mixture :analysis of
solder
Theory:-A mixture of tin(IV) and lead(II) ions may be complexed by adding an excess of
standard EDTA solution, the excess EDTA being determined by titration with a standard
solution of lead nitrate; the total lead-plus-tin content of the solution is thus determined.
Sodium fluoride is then added and this displaces the EDTA from the tin (IV)-EDTA
complex; the liberated EDTA is determined by titration with a standard lead solution.
Procedure:-
1. Prepare a standard EDTA solution (0.2M), a standard lead solution (0.01 M), a 30 per
cent aqueous solution of hexamine, and a 0.2 per cent aqueous solution of xylenol
orange.
2. Dissolve a weighed amount (about 0.4 g) of solder in 10 mL of concentrated
hydrochloric acid and 2 mL of concentrated nitric acid; gentle warming is necessary.
3. Boil the solution gently for about 5 minutes to expel nitrous fumes and chlorine, and
allow cooling slightly, whereupon some lead chloride may separate.
4. Add 25.0 mL of standard 0.2M EDTA and boil for 1 minute; the lead chloride
dissolves and a clear solution is obtained. Dilute with 100 mL of de-ionized water, cool
and dilute to 250 mL in a graduated flask.
5. Without delay, pipette two or three 25.0 mL portions into separate conical flasks. To
each flask add l5mL hexamine solution, ll0 mL de-ionized water, and a few drops of
xylenol orange indicator.
6. Titrate with the standard lead nitrate solution until the color changes from yellow to
red.
7. Now add 2.0 g sodium fluoride; the solution acquires a yellow color owing to the
liberation of EDTA from its tin complex.
8. Titrate again with the standard lead nitrate solution until a permanent (i.e. stable for 1
minute) red color is obtained. Add the titrant drop wise near the end point; a temporary
pink or red color gradually reverting to yellow signals the approach of the end point.
Calculation:-
Wt. Pb
mmol Pb = *1000
A.Wt.
Wt. Pb
% Pb in mixture = Wt. sample *100
Wt. Sn
mmol Sn = A. Wt. *1000
Wt. Sn
% Sn in mixture = *100
Wt. sample
Discussion:-
0
Procedure:-
1. Prepare the indicator by grinding 0.1 g murexide with l0g of potassium nitrate; use
about 50 mg of the mixture for each titration.
2. And an ammonium chloride solution (1 M) by dissolving 26.75 g ammonium chloride
in de-ionized water in a 500 mL graduated flask.
3. The potassium tetracyanonickelate(II) which is required to be prepared as follows.
Dissolve 25 g of analytical grade NiSO4.7H2O in 50 mL distilled water and add portion
wise, with agitation, 25g potassium cyanide. (Caution: use a fume cupboard.) A yellow
solution forms and a white precipitate of potassium sulphate separates.
4. Gradually add, with stirring, 100 mL of 95 per cent ethanol, filter off the precipitated
potassium sulphate with suction, and wash twice with 2 mL ethanol.
5. Concentrate the filtrate at ‘about 70 °C an infrared heater is convenient for this
purpose. When crystals commence to separate, stir frequently. When the crystalline mass
becomes thick (without evaporating completely to dryness), allow cooling and mixing
the crystals with 50 mL ethanol. Separate the crystals by suction filtration and wash
twice with 5 mL portions ethanol. Spread the fine yellow crystals in thin layers upon
absorbent paper, and allow standing for 2-3 days in the air, adequately protected from
dust. During this period the excess of potassium cyanide is converted into potassium
carbonate. The preparation is then ready for use; it should be kept in a stoppered bottle.
7. Palladium (II) compounds can be determined by a similar procedure, but in this case,
after addition of the cyanonickelate, excess of standard (0.01 M) EDTA solution is
added, and the excess is back-titrated with standard (0.01M) manganese (II) sulphate
solution using solochrome black indicator. Gold may be titrated similarly.
Calculation:-
mole Ag+
mmo, Ag+ = mmol EDTA *
mole EDTA
Wt.
*1000 = (M * V) * 2
A.Wt
1
Wt.
% Ag = *100
Wt. sample
Discussion:-
1. Why ethanol is added?
2. What is the yellow perception?
3. Why NH4Cl, NiSO4.7H2O, and KCN are added?
4. Write chemical equation to express the titration reaction?
Experiment No.(38):- Determination of P rotein in Bread
Theory:-This quantitative method of analysis for proteins is based on a determination
of the %w/w N in the sample. Since different cereal proteins have similar amounts of
nitrogen, the experimentally determined %w/w N is multiplied by a factor of 5.7 to give
the %w/w protein in the sample (on average there are 5.7 g of cereal protein for every
gram of nitrogen). As described here, nitrogen is determined by the Kjeldahl method.
The protein in a sample of bread is oxidized in hot concentrated H2SO4, converting the
nitrogen to NH4 +. After making the solution alkaline, converting NH4+ to NH3, the
ammonia is distilled into a flask containing a known amount of standard strong acid.
Finally, the excess strong acid is determined by a back titration with a standard strong
base titrant.
Procedure:-
1. Transfer a 2.0-g sample of bread, which has previously been air dried and ground into
a powder.
2. To a suitable digestion flask, along with 0.7 g of HgO as a catalyst, 10 g of K2SO4, and
25 mL of concentrated H2SO4. Bring the solution to a boil, and continue boiling until the
solution turns clear, and for at least an additional 30 min.
3. After cooling to below room temperature, add 200 mL of H2O and 25 mL of 4% w/v
K2S to remove the Hg2+ catalyst. Add a few Zn granules to serve as boiling stones, and
25 g of NaOH.
4. Quickly connect the flask to a distillation apparatus, and distill the NH3 into a
collecting flask containing a known amount of standardized HCl. The tip of the
condenser should be placed below the surface of the strong acid.
5. After the distillation is complete, titrate the excess strong acid with a standard solution
of NaOH, using methyl red as a visual indicator.
Calculation:-
Discussion:-
1. Oxidizing the protein converts the nitrogen to NH4+. Why is the amount of nitrogen
not determined by titrating the NH4+ with a strong base?
2. Ammonia is a volatile compound as evidenced by the strong smell of even dilute
solutions. This volatility presents a possible source of determinate error. Will this
determinate error be negative or positive?
3. Discuss the steps taken in this procedure to minimize this determinate error?
4. How does K2S remove Hg2+, and why is this important?
Experiment No.(39):- Determination of Total Chlorine Residual
Theory:-The chlorination of public water supplies results in the formation of several
chlorine-containing species, the combined concentration of which is called the total
chlorine residual. Chlorine may be present in a variety of states including free residual
chlorine, consisting of Cl2, HOCl, and OCl–, and combined chlorine residual,
consisting of NH2Cl, NHCl2, and NCl3. The total chlorine residual is determined by
using the oxidizing power of chlorine to convert I– to I3–.
The amount of I3– formed is then determined by a redox titration using S2O32– as a
titrant and starch as an indicator. Regardless of its form, the total chlorine residual is
calculated as if all the chlorine were available as Cl2, and is reported as parts per
million of Cl.
Procedure:-
1. Select a volume of sample requiring less than 20 mL of S2O32– to reach the end
point.
2. Using glacial acetic acid, acidify the sample to a pH in the range of 3 to 4.
3. Add about 1 g of KI. And titrate with Na2S2O3 until the yellow color due to I3–
begins to disappear.
4. Add 1 mL of a starch indicator solution, and continue titrating until the blue color of
the starch–I3– complex disappears. The volume of titrant needed to reach the end point
should be corrected for reagent impurities by conducting a blank titration.
Calculation:-
Discussion:-
1. Is this an example of a direct or an indirect analysis?
2. Why is the procedure not carried out directly using KI as a titrant?
3. Both oxidizing and reducing agents can interfere with this analysis. Explain what
effect each of these interferes will have on the result of an analysis?
References:-
1-Douglas A. Skooge and Donald M. West, (analytical chemistry an
introduction) ,4th edition ,NY,1986.
2- Douglas A. Skooge, Donald M. West, and F. James Holler
,(fundamental of analytical chemistry) ,5th edition,1988.
3- Douglas A. Skooge, Donald M. West, F. James Holler , and Stanly R.
Crouch ,(analytical chemistry) ,8th edition ,Brooks/Cole ,2004.
4-Gary D. Christiane, (analytical chemistry) ,6th edition ,2004.
5-David Harvy, (analytical chemistry) , 2000.
6-G. H. Jeffery, J. Bassett, J. Mendham, and R. C. Denny, (quantitative
chemical analysis) (Vogles), 5th edition, 1989.
4
ﺟﻤﮭﻮرﯾﺔ اﻟﻌﺮاق
وزارة اﻟﺘﻌﻠﯿﻢ اﻟﻌﺎﻟﻲ واﻟﺒﺤﺚ اﻟﻌﻠﻤﻲ
اﻟﺠﺎﻣﻌﺔ اﻟﻤﺴﺘﻨﺼﺮﯾﺔ
ﻛﻠﯿﺔ اﻟﻌﻠﻮم
ﻗﺴﻢ اﻟﻜﯿﻤﯿﺎء
اﻋﺪاد
اﻟﻤﺪرس اﻟﻤﺴﺎﻋﺪ
رﺑﻰ ﻓﮭﻤﻲ ﻋﺒﺎس
اﺷﺮاف
اﻟﻤﺪرس اﻟﺪﻛﺘﻮر اﻟﻤﺪرس اﻟﺪﻛﺘﻮر
ﻋﺒﺎس ﺷﺒﯿﺐ ﺣﺴﻦ اﻟﻜﺎظﻤﻲ ﻣﺤﻤﺪ ﻋﺒﺪ اﻟﮭﺎدي ﺧﻠﯿﻞ اﻟﺴﻮز
Method 9.1