1-Sm EVTOL 2019 UAM-Jacobson
1-Sm EVTOL 2019 UAM-Jacobson
Realistically, this means most will likely start out with a human “flying” the airplane with a great deal of automation
assistance from software. In this case, the system is using autonomy in many areas but the on-board human pilot is
performing a lot of the perception and planning tasks and is actively involved with handling any emergency or
anomalous conditions that arise.
But as soon as we can, we start to pull the human “pilot” out of the loop. This can be accomplished by:
• Using a human “operator” on a Ground Control Station over a C2 link (1:1), then;
• Evolve to a human “supervisor” on a Ground Control Station over the C2 link (1:1), then;
• Move to a human “dispatcher” monitoring multiple flights on Ground Control Station (1:Many), and;
• Possibly end up with little to no human monitoring (but that’s a long way down the road, if ever).
In the meantime, we start with using software to assist a conventional pilot, and we are datalogging everything in the
expectation that the ensuing database of performance can be used as part of a field service history certification input.
We are in active discussions with the FAA on what it means to “certify” a control station and are active in industry
working groups to facilitate unrestricted flight in the National Airspace System for unmanned, or non-traditionally
piloted aircraft.
3
Our Contribution to UAM & OPV
A myriad of automation and autonomy technology and subsystems are required to permit success in Urban Air
Mobility (UAM) and Optionally Piloted Vehicles (OPV). We have, or are working on:
5
Certification in the National Airspace System
• Early and frequent communication with the FAA certification authorities
• Drawing on our 20+ year history of certifying advanced avionics in traditional manned flight
• Use of hardware and software partitioning
• Emphasis on Run-Time Assurance and Monitoring techniques such as kinematic comparators
• Fail-functional – no human backup required
• Extensive data logging for post anomaly analysis and corrective action
• Designs that support both “Micro STCs” in our Cessna 182 and Cirrus SR22 – frequent & incremental
certifications using more and more automation (logical and approvable baby steps)
• Start with existing in-cockpit iPad app fully interactive with certified panel avionics
• Then tablet is outside of aircraft and used for enroute operations
• Then add servos to throttle, mixture, brakes
• Etc
And
• Fully autonomous systems with operational constraints that are gradually reduced over time.
• Pre-defined routes only
• Pre-defined contingency behaviors
• Autopilot is always on and has no mode control panel
• Deterministic loss-link behavior
• Etc
OPV Projects
• We have converted company C-182 to an
Optionally Piloted Vehicle (OPV) use as a test
bed for Control Station and Autonomy software
development.