0% found this document useful (0 votes)
118 views27 pages

SEC - Facebook WB Re 2020 Electioms

See Substack Article https://file411.substack.com/p/the-actual-facebook-sec-whistleblower

Uploaded by

File 411
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
118 views27 pages

SEC - Facebook WB Re 2020 Electioms

See Substack Article https://file411.substack.com/p/the-actual-facebook-sec-whistleblower

Uploaded by

File 411
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 27
WHISTLEBLOWER ZO AID Report government and corporate lawbreaking. Without breoking the law. - REDACTED FOR CONGRESS - —ANONYMOUS WHISTLEBLOWER DISCLOSURE— | SEC Office of the Whistleblower Via Online Portal & Fax Re: Supplemental Disclosure of Securities Law Violations by Facebook, Inc. (NASDAQ: FB), SEC TCR Facebook misled investors and the public about its role perpetuating misinformation and violent extremism relating to the 2020 election and January 6th insurrection. To the SEC Office of the Whistleblower: 1. The instant letter is one of multiple disclosures related to the above-captioned matter. Our anonymous client is disclosing original evidence showing that Facebook, Inc. (NASDAQ: FB) has, for years past and ongoing, violated U.S, securities laws by making material misrepresentations and omissions in statements to investors and prospective investors, including, inter alia, through filings with the SEC, testimony to Congress, online statements and media stories. 2. On August 26, 2021, the U.S. House of Representatives Select Committee to Investigate the January 6 Attack on the United States Capitol requested from Facebook:* All internal or external reviews, studies, reports, data, analyses, and related communications regarding your platform(s) and: i. Misinformation, disinformation, and malinformation relating to the 2020 election; Whistleblower Aid is a U.S. tax-exempt, 501(c)(3) organization, EIN 26-4716045. hittpsi/WhistleblowerAic.org — I Hl Contact via SecureDrop over Tor: http://whistlebloweraid.s = 2) of a link or a photo, we find they are 4 times more likely to be seeing misinfo compared to when they see links or photos on News Feed in general. This increases to 5-10X at higher reshare depths. . . 30-70% of misinfo viewership occurs on reshares of reshares . . . In the US, that’s 65% for photo misinfo, and 35% for link misinfo . The reshare depth of a post is defined by how many reshares away it is from the original post. . . political operatives and publishers tell us that they rely more on negativity and sensationalism for distribution due to recent algorithmic changes that favor reshares."” » [Comparing the effects of misinfo rom polticians vs ordinary user sources, p 1 » 2020-08-18 Poca Influence on Content Poly. 9.4. » Effects of Poltcian Shared Misinformation. p. 34 » eshare ranking exp in nda Indonisia,p.1.&;soe also NN Reshare depth inca an indonesia. » [Deep Reshares end Misinformation 3. — ANONYMOUS WHISTLEBLOWER DISCLOSURE — 13 WHISTLEBLOWER - REDACTED FOR CONGRESS - ZOAID Report government and corporate lawbreaking. ‘Without breaking the law. “A ranking change which reduces ranking based on max reshare depth produces significant wins on a variety of integrity measures .. . Stemming from the initial finding that reshare depth is correlated with misinformation, subsequent research has found that other integrity harms also correlate with reshare depth... °° “70% of VPVs [View Port View, Facebook's term of art for a user impression] ‘on known link misinfo come from reshares . . . 50% to 80% of VPVs on known link misinfo come from the top 1K most seen links per day . Reshare depth appears to be an especially good signal for targeting link misinfo in India and the Philippines. . . misinfo prevalence is 15-25X higher among VPVs of depth 2+ reshares. ..” “An effective, content-agnostic approach to mitigate the harms posted by high-harm misinfo (e.g. civic or health) would be to dampen virality within these topics by hard demoting all deep reshares where the viewer is not a 0 “Political parties . . . claim that Facebook’s algorithm change in 2018 (MSI) has changed the nature of politics. For the worse. They argue that the isis on ‘reshareability’ systematically rewards provocative, low-quality content.”"’ “fin Myanmar] Misinformation, misrepresentation and account issues are a few known high-risk abuse areas that will be exacerbated by a second COVID outbreak ... The Reshare Depth demotion reduces the distribution of highly-viral content to give more distribution to content produced by friends or connections of friends . . [N.B.: Measures enacted to demote reshare depth to reduce the distribution of highly-viral content in fact reduced Viral Inflammatory Prevalence by 25.1% and Photo formation by 48.5% in Myanmar, Facebook sai We plan to roll back this intervention after the Myanmar election in November." 5 [Max Reshare Depth experiment, p. 1-2. 2 Further reading from Reshare Depth Article, p. 2. a Fighting high harm misinfo with deep reshare damping, p. 1; see also MEE Resinare depth by Pottical Party response to the 18 Algorithm change, p. 1. JReshare depth exp in Myanmar, p. 1 — ANONYMOUS WHISTLEBLOWER DISCLOSURE — 14 WHISTLEBLOWER - REDACTED FOR CONGRESS - ZOAID Report government and corporate lawbreaking. ‘Without breaking the law. 25. Facebook's failure to limit reshares is incredibly risky because under one percent of users drive haff of all the user impressions [called “VPVs"] on reshare posts: “Considering the 28 days from February 22 - March 21, 2021 2.82 B users were active on Facebook. 978 M users created at least one reshare post (34.6%). 37 M users (1.3% created half of all reshare posts. 21 Musers (0.7%) created reshapes accounting for half of all VPVs on reshare posts (within three days)."® 26.To avoid criticism resulting from inevitable false positives when removing harmful content, Facebook chooses to “demote” it instead, which it knows to be an ineffective response: “Due to the unboundedness of ranking scores, neither global all demotions nor viewed term demotions can effectively re-rank some content...[If we have some signal that a piece of content is low-quality or will cause a bad experience and we want to counter the engagement score, we have to apply a pretty big demotion . . . How big would the integrity demotion on global all have to be for a piece of content to be ranked X places lower? ... some 4 _ 90% ... .Let me make this last point clearer. If you demoted the top-ranked VPV by 10%, 74% of these VPVs would maintain their top spot. If you demoted the top-ranked VPV by 50%, 27% would be unmoved. 4.5% of VPs are impervious to even a 90% demotion.” 27. Facebook has avoided or rolled back interventions for “groups” and “narrow subpopulations” that it knew reduced misinformation, violence and incitement, because those interventions reduced the platform's growth: “Harmful communities have been seen to grow via using our platform affordances . .. the @Anon community relied on minimally-connecte less than 5 months! . . . The civic integrity team explored a variety of changes to the way civic content was ranked during US 2020 and identified several features which promoted a more healthy ecosystem . ..™° "Quantifying the Concentration of Reshares and their VPVs Among Users" p. 1. [Demotions in practice, p. 5, 9-10. Harmful Non- Violating Narratives, p.8, 10, 15, 19, 20. — ANONYMOUS WHISTLEBLOWER DISCLOSURE — 5 WHISTLEBLOWER - REDACTED FOR CONGRESS - x AID Report government and corporate lawbreaking. ‘Without breaking the law. [However] “We have rollk k election rate limit of 1 i ‘lhe ” i Gi = [which was implemented in October 2020 to reduce] joins to sensitive groups or groups that became sensitive.” “We've seen that integrity harms tend to be concentrated in a small number of User Interest Subpopulations, with 50% or more of a given harm often in 1% or less of Subpopulations . . . More than 50% of civic misinformation on Facebook is associated with a handful of highly-civic communities. . . Misinformation on Instagram is also disproportionally concentrated among a few Subpopulations. . . Over 50% of QAnon & MSM (Militarized Social Movements) Groups are associated with a single Subpopulation . ."” [March 2020] “{There are likely meaningful opportunities for impact via integrating Segmentation with either Voter Suppression or Hate Speech [] The majority of US Groups posts containing Voter Suppression over the past 2 months occurred in Groups associated with just 2 sociographic segments [ |] The Groups in segments with the highest prevalence experience 100x as many borderline hate speech posts as the overall average.”® [April 2020] “Disbelief comments are produced at disproportionate rates on civic content posted by extreme partisans. This suggests content posted by extreme partisans might be more likely to be false . . " Facebook's own tools are used to direct narrowcast misinformation: “Up to 64% of IRA [Internet Research Agency, a Russian troll farm] ads nay have en targeted using Facebook's automated targeting [From August 2020] “Many Users Are Repeat or Serial Offenders For Both Misinformation and Hate . . . surfaced a connection between misinformation and hate within the context of highly polarized communities along with patterns of serial offending and potential recidivism . . . There may be substantial intersections between hate and misinformation, which could be lswitch Plan for all Group Recommendation Surfaces, p. 3 ubpopulations: Segmentations Wiki, p. 1, 19-21 ‘ociagraphic Segments may be impactful for hate speech and voter suppression, p. 1 identifying Narrowcast Misinfo Hard because missing or miscalibrated doubt, p. 3 [Measuring Human Perception to Defend Democracy, p. 24 — ANONYMOUS WHISTLEBLOWER DISCLOSURE — 16 WHISTLEBLOWER - REDACTED FOR CONGRESS - x AID Report government and corporate lawbreaking. ‘Without breaking the law. an area for intervention . . . 59M users have posted or shared at least 3 pieces of predicted misinformation in the past 90d. (l)... 99% of these user accounts remain active, and some of them have passed dozens of authenticity checks.”*' 2020 Election & Capitol Insurrection 28. In April 2020, removing “Downstream MSI!" from Facebook's Meaningful Social Interactions algorithm (the News Feed's goaling mechanism) was suggested as a “soft action" that would significantly decrease the amount of hateful, polarization, or violence inciting content from the News Feed without doing any content based censorship. CEO Mark Zuckerberg rejected this intervention that could have reduced the risk of violence in the 2020 election: “Downstream model depreciation: Mark doesn’t think we could go broad . za Mt the in ic misinformation] if there was a material tradeoff with MSI impact [‘meaningful social interactions” ."° Note: The "Meaningful" part of Meaningful Social Interactions is more a flourish than substance - for example, all comments were considered "meaningful", even if they were hate speech or bullying (for six months after this memo). All likes were considered "meaningful" along with all reshares.® 29, Facebook's records state: [August 2020] “We should avoid making significant changes to the IFR [in feed recommendations] publisher ecosystem prior to the US 2020 election, if those changes will have a large impact on entity-level aistribution for political figures, commentators, or news organizations in the US... . FINAL DECISION . » we have decided to not make any changes until the election is over. We will revisit the issue after the election."** [August 2020] “I've seen promising interventions from integrity product teams, with strong research and data support, be prematurely stifled or severely constrained by key decision makers--often based on fears of ublic and policy stakeholder responses. . . . For example, we've known a Serial misinfo and hate offenders, p. 2.3. a Mark Feedback on Soft Action Proposal + Deck presented fo Mark, p. 1. 8 "Filtering out engagement-bait, bullying and excessive comments from MSI Deltold metric 11/1 onwards" “ (Update On Poitical Publisher Issues, p. 1-2. — ANONYMOUS WHISTLEBLOWER DISCLOSURE — ” WHISTLEBLOWER - REDACTED FOR CONGRESS - ZOAID Report government and corporate lawbreaking. ‘Without breaking the law. for over a year now that our recommendation systems can very quickly lead users down the path to conspiracy theories and groups. [] While the Recommendations integrity team has made impressive strides in cleaning up our recs, FB [Facebook] has been hesitant to outright ban/filter conspiracy groups like QAnon until just last week. [] In the meantime, this fringe group/set of beliefs has grown to national prominence with QAnon congressional candidates and QAnon hashtags and groups trending in the mainstream. We were willing to act only “after* things had spiraled into a dire state.* 30. Thus, Facebook allowed misinformation and harmful content to persist. “Through most of 2020, we saw non-violating content promoting QAnon spreading through our platforms. Belief in the QAnon conspiracy took hold in multiple communities, and we saw multiple cases in which such belief motivated people to kill or conspire to Kill perceived enemies . . . Policies don't fully cover harms [] We implement policies for many of these areas that limit our ability to act. . . high-profile entities were able to serially spread... . claims without crossing our falsifiable misinformation based lines for enforcement. . . we've often taken minimal action initially due to a combination [of] policy and product limitations making it extremely challenging to design, get approval for, and roll out new interventions quickly. Afterward, we've often been prompted by societal outcry at the resulting harms to implement entity takedowns. For instance, we've enacted this pattern with both QAnon and delegitimization, wherein we initially took limited or no action, and later decided to take down Groups, Pages, and even Users supporting these movements . . . Bringing problematic content prevalence [conspiracies about COVID and vaccine discouragement] in the top 2% of communities in line with average communities could reduce the size of the overall problem by up to ~80%. Based on our experiences with US 2020 election delegitimization, QAnon, and Dangerous Orgs, there are at least three conceptual roles we need to address... ."* 31.Only after and in response to the Capitol protest and public pressure did Facebook take certain steps related to the above items on a temporary basis, such as: ® Badge Post - DS Misinfo, p. 2-3. “| Harmful Non-Violating Narratives, p.8, 10, 15, 19, 20 — ANONYMOUS WHISTLEBLOWER DISCLOSURE — 18 WHISTLEBLOWER - REDACTED FOR CONGRESS - x AID Report government and corporate lawbreaking. ‘Without breaking the law. “Immediate response to Val [violence and inciting] risk in DC [] US2020 Levers, Previously Rolled Back . . . Increased [] ability to action more . Applied demotion to content deemed likely to violate our Community Standards in the areas of hate speech, graph violence, and violence & incitement. . Made users less likely to see content we expect them to report Require Admins review and approve posts in civic groups that accumulate four strikes . ..” “Reduced the strength of a LIVE video boost that was contributing to ultra-rapid virality for low-quality videos . . . removed 10 product boosts for civic and health content . . . Capped the strength which videos could be boosted . . . Explicitly include delegitimizing terms (ex. stop the steal) into the civic classifier .. . Lowered] threshold to demote hateful comments . . . Dropped the Groups invite rate limits from 100 to 30 to address evidence of concerning groups building growth through mass invitations . .."°” 32. Internal analysis also noted: “Early January 2021 had three events on the political calendar that deserved attention .. . we anticipated new, narrow-topic misinfo stories to appear and spread rapidly . . ."* IG iG ineteorar ve Capitol | Hill Violence | Data Oe = ta ees aad Teump or were videos of Donald Trump. Several of the top (reported) posts called for [violence], suggested the overthrow of the government would be [desirable] . . Top Reported User... . President Donald J. Trump [with 121 reports, compared with the second highest at 46 reports}.’? “[We should have adapted already long ago . the Steal groups active up until yesterday . resources we have, we should do better.” “We've been fueling this fire for a long time and we shouldn't be surprised it's now out of control.” There were dozens of Stop. . With the unprecedented “[DJo you genuinely think 24 hours is a meaningful ban? You mention the list of things we've changed in the past few years but how are we expected to Capitol Rots Breaks the Glass, pp 1-4 sponse to events in early January 2021 - lessons for algorithmic interventions, p. 3-4 “| 1G Jan 6 Capitol Riot Violence Update p. 1-2. — ANONYMOUS WHISTLEBLOWER DISCLOSURE — w - REDACTED FOR CONGRESS - WHISTLEBLOWER OND Report government and corporate lawbreaking. ‘Without breaking the law. “A 24-hour ban is nothing for Trump. His proxies on social media can easily keep the fires going during that time, and he will return...” “How about refusing to take another dime of Trump's advertising money? | do acknowledge that a 24-hour ban is a pretty big deal, but that’s only because up until now, our response has been completely tepid.” 33. Facebook acknowledged that how they resolved tradeoffs was dangerous, which is why they chose more conservative solutions for the US 2020 election. In contrast to their claims to their advertisers that they done all they could do to prevent the insurrection, they reverted back to these safer defaults only after the Insurrection flared up: “Action: CAP LVEQ (Live Video EQ) boost linearly for civic videos at max 83.5x instead of 850x - Return to original US2020 threshold Description: Reduced the strength of a LIVE video boost that was contributing to ultra-rapid vitality for low-quality videos."*" 'US2020 [election] Levers, Previously Rolled Back. ID Name [Description | \Val (Violence and Inciting): Cluster Increased our ability to action more similar | English hate speech |- Spanish hate speech '- Graphic violence - Violence & incitement RE45 [Val ignores and drive specialist [content in bulk, based on SME (subject matter} (PResc) Review at the cluster tlevel expert) review Use classifiers to demote content starting with a 5% demotion for [Applied demotion to content deemed likely to [content that has a 5% chance of \violate our Community Standards in areas of pe |veleting lhate speech, graphic violence, and violence & incitement; the demotion's strength is in lproportion to how confident we are that |content is violating, |Comments on Zuckerberg’s response to capitol riots, p. 4, 5,8, [Capitol Riots Breaks the Glass, pp 4 — ANONYMOUS WHISTLEBLOWER DISCLOSURE — 2 REDACTED FOR CONGRESS - WHISTLEBLOWER OND Report government and corporate lawbreaking. ‘Without breokng the law Increased the max strength of linear probable esq {V8I: Increase demotion strength cap_|volating Val demotion (PEt), allowing us to from 50% to 80% further downrank higher confidence (50-80% lconfidence) Vl content. 'V&l: Increase strength of p(report) to [Made users less likely to see content we E48 _|reduce visibilty of V&l posts likely to jexpect them to report to Facebook, be reported laddressing subjectively problematic content. [Require Admins review and approve posts in leivie groups that accumulate four strikes [strikes require admins to have ereated or ‘Turned on mandatory post approval ee, |p eens lapproved the violating content) as well as 57 eet fast-moving new groups, helping ensure that ne |Admins are properly policing and being held laccountable for serious violations during the election [Prevents commenting on Groups posts that teh tial sos wil |show a high rate of hate speech and violence incitement in associated comments, ‘groups that start to have a high rate u PE17 laddressing concer that group Admins and lof hate speech and violence and na Imembers are "baiting violating material and incitement comments. . : coordination of harm via otherwise lnon-violating posts. [Updated pre-emptive lever to disable 'V8l: Add reduced criteria to trigger [comments in group threads (PE17) that were ESS comment auto-disable in group starting to have too much hate speech or |comment threads (extension of PE17) |violence & incitement to better catch threads leary on. [Prevents groups from changing names to Prevent groups from changing their [8 28s0ciated with recent attempts to RES eaves a a a Pa a " ldelegitimize the US election results (Stop the gamer’ |Steal), helping to slow down abusive laudience building [Prevent Abusive Audience Building by ire-naming and re-purposing/arowth existing Ress [Preventing pages fom changing thelr Jpages associated with recent attempts to ali \delegitimize the US election results (Stop the Steal) a Fier entities with names matching "stop the REs7 _[Fiter deleattimizing entities from | 2" regex from recommendation surfaces recommendations lacross FB inc. — ANONYMOUS WHISTLEBLOWER DISCLOSURE — a WHISTLEBLOWER OND Report government and corporate lawbreaking. ‘Without breaking the law. - REDACTED FOR CONGRESS - [Addressed challenges with enforcing existing |scaled policy and a spike in violations of lescalations-only subsets of the V&l policy by Ire-reviewing and deleting more user reports. 'SEt up a special re-review queues for RE46 [high risk contents from our user reports with Risk & Response Increased the volume of user reported content \V8l: reduce reactive auto-delete lon the platform we were auto-deleting for {threshold from P90 to P70 \viotating our V8 policy, allowing us to Imanage the influx of repors. REAM TE 34. Invoking immunity under Section 230: Facebook has attempted to claim “immunity” for content under Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, as it did in a recent court case, arguing: “Section 230 requires dismissal of lawsuits like plaintiffs’ [victims of sex trafficking on Facebook and Instagram] that seek to impose liability on interactive computer services for harmful content posted or communicated on their platforms by third parties .. . Section 230’s plain text makes clear that it immunizes interactive service provides [i.e., Facebook] from suit, not just from liabilty.""° KNOWLEDGE OF MATERIALITY 35. Facebook has admitted investor risks with thes Facebook's recent 10-K™ acknowledged: “Our brands mi us negativel; the actions of thai are deemed to be hostile or inappropriate to other users, by the actions of users acting under false or inauthentic identities, by the use of our products or services to disseminate information that is deemed to be misleading (or intended to manipulate opinions) . . .” issues. For instance, 36. Likewise, Facebook's 10-Q* stated: 8 EIEN C2p101 Rts Breaks ine Glass, pg. +3 Facebook's Petition for Writ of Mandamus, In re Facebook, Inc. and Facebook, Inc. d/bva Instagram, Cause Nos. 2018-69816 & 2018-82214 et seq., (Supreme Court of Texas, Filed May 29, 2020). StpsilsecreportiDacumenv0004326801-2-0000141 ‘*hitpsileec.reporvDocumentv000132680!-21-000049), — ANONYMOUS WHISTLEBLOWER DISCLOSURE — 2 WHISTLEBLOWER - REDACTED FOR CONGRESS - ZOD Report government and corporate lawbreaking. ‘Without breaking the law. “In addition, we have been, and may in the future be, subject to negative publicity in connection with our handling of misinformation and other illicit or objectionable use of our products or services, including in connection with the COVID-19 pandemic and elections in the United States and around the world. Any such negative publicity could have an adverse effect on the size, engage: and loyalty of our user base and marketer demand for advertising on our products, which could result in decreased revenue and adversely affect our business and financial results, and we have experienced such adverse effects to varying degrees.” “For example, we have been the subject of significant media coverage involving concems around our handling of political speech and advertising, hate speech, and other content, and we continue to receive negative publicity related to these topics. ... Any such negative publicity could have an adverse effect on the size, engagement, and loyalty of our user base and marketer demand for advertising on our products, which could result in decreased revenue and adversely affect our business and financial results, and we have experienced such adverse effects to varying degrees from time to time.” 37.Role for the SEC. The SEC is charged with enforcing the laws that protect investors in public companies like Facebook. Facebook’s investors care about misrepresentations and omissions by Mark Zuckerberg and other Facebook ‘executives on the topic of misinformation relating to the insurrection for two reasons. First, to the extent that users become aware of the dangers that Facebook platforms present, they are likely to use the platforms less, leading to lower advertising revenue and lower profits. Second, some investors simply will not want to invest in a company that facilitates misinformation and violence on and off of the internet and then engages in misstatements and omissions on the topic. 38.Whistleblower Aid is a non-profit legal organization that helps workers report their concerns about violations of the law safely, lawfully, and responsibly. We respectiully request the SEC’s assistance ensuring that our client never faces retaliation — ANONYMOUS WHISTLEBLOWER DISCLOSURE — 2 WHISTLEBLOWER - REDACTED FOR CONGRESS - ZOAID Report government and corporate lawbreakin, Without breoking the aw 39.On information and belief, none of the documents enclosed here constitute attorney-client communications, were obtained during a meeting with an attorney, or otherwise indicate that they are in any way privileged. 40.We plan to continue supplementing this disclosure with additional information and evidence. Our client would be happy to meet with investigators at your convenience. Please feel free to contact us using the information below. 41, We are representing an anonymous whistleblower who is making the above disclosures solely for reporting the suspected violation of laws as outlined. Sincerely, yee John N. Tye, Attorney at Law Chief Disclosure Officer eT Andrew Bakaj, Attorney at Law Of Counsel — ANONYMOUS WHISTLEBLOWER DISCLOSURE — WHISTLEBLOWER - REDACTED FOR CONGRESS - ZO AID Report government and corporate lawbreakin, Without breoking the aw Enclosures: (ERE -acebo0k documents including — (EB Re share depth exp in Myanmar HER Capito! Protest Break The Glass (RR A Risk Countries Planning (ERE Comments on Zuck's response to capitol riots TER Capito! Riots Break the Glass EER 1G. Jan 6 Capitol Riot Violence Update Ee ER Sermtul Topic Communities HER Coordinated Social Harm EERE Visinfo got worse in 2019 ERR Harmiul Conspiracies GER | otus Mahal HER Aciversarial Harmful Networks - India Case study. GER What is Collateral damage? ER Anicrew Bosworth Thoughts for 2020 (ER Measuring Human Perception to Defend Democracy (ER Diverse Engagement May Identify Valuable Civic Comments EERE Visinfo in comments RR They used to post selfies, now they're trying to reverse the election ERE Comparing the effects of misinfo from politicians vs ordinary user sources — ANONYMOUS WHISTLEBLOWER DISCLOSURE —

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy