Steel Design
Steel Design
COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING
CIVIL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
SUBMITTED TO:
ENGR. JAKE MARAMOT
HEAD, CIVIL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
BY:
DOTE, DEXTER S.
SILANG, JANINA RUZZEL B.
VILLARAN, IRVIN JAY
MAY 2020
i
APPROVAL SHEET
In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the subject CE 20L (Structural Design
2 – Steel and Timber Design) Lab, this thesis entitled Structural Analysis and Design of
a Night Market has been prepared and submitted by Jessica C. Aloya, Reynand P.
Amada, and Carmela Angela R. Montalbo.
Recommending Approval:
_______________________
Engr. Jake Maramot
Insructor, CE 20 / Department Head, Civil Engineering Dept.
ii
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
This Thesis may not be accomplished without the support and guidance of several
persons who contributed their knowledge all throughout this research study.
First we would like to thank God, our main contributor to this thesis, for the strength
and wisdom that He has given to me. Without His help we may not have the strength to
even start this study
To our family, for the undying support to our dream and to their understanding the
needs that can help us with this study.
And lastly, for our CE professors and instructors, to their guidance and and
encouragement that help us understand more about the subject.
iii
DEDICATION
It is with our sincerest thanks to all the people who in those times of needs, trials
and confusion have engaged to finish this study.
This piece of work is wholeheartedly dedicated to all people who helped and guided
me in those times of needs, trials and confusion have engaged to finish this study.
To our parents, , who have given us the drive and discipline to tackle any task with
enthusiasm and determination. Without their love and support, this thesis would not
have been made possible;
To our friends for their help, support, concern, and encouragement and for believing
that we could do it.
Lastly and above all, to God for giving us strength and courage throughout this
journey, without Him this thesis would not have been made possible
iv
ARCHITECTURAL PLAN
12m
5m
5m
20m
5m
m
5m
m
SPECIFICATIONS
II. SPECIFICATIONS
DESIGN CRITERIA
Use A-36 steel grade with a minimum yield stress of 248 MPa.
Allowable Stress: Strong Axis Bending of I-Shape Member and Channels
(NSCP 506.2)
For members with compact sections (excluding hybrid beams and members with
yield point greater than 448 MPa) symmetrical about, and loaded in, the plane of their
minor axis the allowable stress is:
Fb = 0.66Fy
Provided the flanges are connected continuously to the web or webs and the
laterally unsupported length of the compression flange Lb does not exceed the value Lc,
as given by the smaller of:
200bf 137900bftf
or
Fy dFy
For members meeting the requirements of non-compact sections except that their flanges
are non-compact sections and their webs are compact or non-compact, (excluding hybrid
girders and members with yield points greater than 448 MPa) the allowable stress is:
bf
Fb Fy (.79 .00762 Fy )
2tf
Where:
4.05
Kc
h
( )(.45)
tw
if h/tw > 70 otherwise Kc = 1.0.
For members with a non-compact section, but not included above, and loaded
through the shear center and braced laterally in the region of compression stress at
intervals not exceeding:
200bf
Fy
Fb = 0.60Fy
When:
703270Cb L 3516330Cb
Fy rt Fy
l
Fy ( ) 2 (506-6)
2 rt
Fb Fy ( ) .60 Fy
3 10550 x103 Cb
When:
703270Cb L 3516330Cb
Fy rt Fy
1172100Cb (506-7)
Fb 2
0.60 Fy
l
rt
1172100Cb
Fb 2
0.60 Fy
l
For any value of :
rt
82740
Fb 0.60 Fy (506-8)
ld
Af
The member shall be design on the basis of the gross area unless
otherwise specified. Due to the tendency to bend or to buckle the safe load on
column depends not only on area but also on the safe load of the section. The
most economical section is H and w-sections where the radiuses of gyration
about each axis are equal. Axially loaded columns with unsupported lengths kill
buck or bend in a plane perpendicular to the weaker axis.
DESIGN PROCEDURE:
1. Determine the minimum radius of gyration assuming:
KL KL
200; r
r 200
Fa = 0.45Fy
3. Determine the minimum width b and t thickness for bolted or riveted connections
on sp.
b 4Ø
b = 1/4 or its equivalent in metric for building
t = 5/10 for bridges
AISC SPECIFICATIONS
KL
Cc
r
1 KL / r 2
1
2 Cc
Fa Fy
3
5 3 KL / r 1 KL / r
3 8 Cc 8 Cc
Where:
L
= slenderness ration of any unbraced segment with largest effective value r
r
I min
r
A
2 2 E
Cc
Fy
E = modulus of elasticity,
Es = 200 GPa
KL
120
r
Fa
Fas
L
1 .6
200r
Where:
KL
Fa = value in (2)when Cc
r
Fas = value in (3)when
When:
KL
Cc
r
12 2 E
Fas 2
KL
23
r
Where:
Fas = axial compressive stress permitted in the absence of bending for bracing and
other secondary members
P
GROSS AREA 0.45 Fy ;0.45 Fy Fa
FINAL CONDITIONS:
1.One end is fixed, the other is hinged; k = 0.8, effective length, Le = 0.8L
2.Both ends are fixed, k = 0, Le = 0.65L
3.Both ends are hinged, k = 1, Le = L
4.One end fixed and the other is free, k = 2.1 and Le = 2.1L
UNSYMMETRICAL BENDING
The stress maybe calculated separately for bending about each axis and added
algebraically, thus,
Mx My
fb
Sx Sy
The ± sign indicated that the stresses maybe additive (both tension or both
compression or they maybe subtractive).
In most cases applied load will not be positioned so that its line of action passes through
the centroid of the cross section. It is most common for the load applied at the top of
flange when it occurs the top flange must resist most of the lateral force component.
Actually, this situation results in twisting of bar. The formula for bending stress in the top
becomes:
Mx My
fb
Sx Sy
For typical wide flange shapes the section modulus of the top flange about the y −
axis Sy (top flange) is approximately equal to Sy; hence the formula is:
Mx My
fb
Sx 0.5Sy
Since the allowable bending stress with respect to x − axis and y − axis are different
the AsDs; utilizes an interaction formula of stress ratios for the purpose of establishing a
design interior.
fa
0.15
Fa
The applicable formula is:
f a f bx f by
1 .0
Fa Fbx Fby
Where:
fa = computed axial stress
Fa = computed axial stress
For beam that will be considered; hence, the axial stress will be zero, therefore:
f bx f by
1 .0
Fbx Fby
To utilize the interaction formula for design or unsymmetrical loaded beam, a trial
and error process must be used. The beam size must be estimated; check by the
interaction and revise if necessary.
FV 0.22 Fu
2
Minimum spacing of bolt(s) = 2 3 d ; d = diameter of bolt
Minimum edge distance from center to center of standard hole to edge of connected
part: heared edges = 30 mm; plates/shapes = 22 mm
For wielded connection: use E70 Electrodes, Fu = 483 MPa
Load N/m
Normal 1246.687382
Tangential 415.5624608
DESIGN OF PURLINS WITH NO SAG RODS
DESIGN OF PURLINS WITH NO SAG RODS
Formula Value (N-mm)
Moment wL /8
2
4106637.144
Normal Moment McosØ 3895898.07
Tangential Moment MsinØ 1298632.69
Windload Reference
P = qh(Gcpf – Gcpi)
Wind Pressure NSCP 2001 Section 207.5.1
qh = 47.3x10-6 KzKztV2Iw
Distributed
Dead and Wind Load Details Reference
Load (N/m)
18.97 kg/m 186.0957 ASEP Steel
Weight of Purlins
Handbook 2004
Dead Load
Roofing: Galvanized 7.15 kg/m2 73.93563283
Table 1
Steel Gauge 21
1.9839512
Wind Load 2091.268185
kpa
2183.299518
Load N/m
Normal 2071.259787
Tangential 690.419929
DESIGN OF PURLINS WITH NO SAG RODS
DESIGN OF PURLINS WITH NO SAG RODS
Formula Value (N-mm)
Moment wL2/8 6822810.994
Fb Fb = 0.66Fy 163.944
Therefore SAFE
Fb Fb = 0.66Fy 163.944
Therefore SAFE
LOAD COMBINATIONS
Tributary Area
Concentrated Load, N
Node 1 Node 2 Node 3 Node 4 Node 5 Node 6 Node 7
BN 0 0 0 BN 0 0 0 0
- -
GS 2600 10600 GS 13200 2975.99821 2975.99821
5586.690531 2986.690531
LX 0 0 0 LX 0 0 0 0
Member Member Load, N Member Load Combination, N
Maximum
Bottom Bottom DL+0.75(LL+ Load, N
DL LL WL DL + LL DL + WL
Chord Chord WL)
DESIGN LOAD, N
Top Chord 38585.06481
LIVE LOAD
WIND LOAD
DESIGN OF CHORDS
DESIGN OF TOP CHORD
DESIGN CONDITIONS
Fy A36 Carbon Steel in MPa 248.4
Design Load Pmax in Newtons 38585.06481
Design Length in meters 1.1
Trial Section
Member L 50 X 50 X 6
Weight 4.47 kg/m
Area 569 mm2
Depth 50 mm
Base 50 mm
Thickness 5 mm
Ix, Iy 128 x 103 mm4
rx, ry 15.02 mm
Sx, Sy 3.61 x 103 mm3
Stiffness Factor, K 1
Modulus of Elasticity, E 200,000 MPa
Reference Formula Value
NSCP 2001, Section 505.2.2 Slenderness Ratio 73.23568575
Critical Slenderness
NSCP 2001, Section 505.3.1 126.0677706
Ratio, Cc
Therefore, CASE 1
Therefore, Fa 111.0135564
Mpa
Case 1 CASE 2
If
Trial Section
Member L 50 X 50 X 6
Area 569 mm2
Actual Stress
33.90603235 Mpa
Checking
fa 33.90603235 Mpa
Fa 111.0135564 Mpa
Therefore SAFE
DESIGN OF Diagonal CHORD
DESIGN CONDITIONS
Fy A36 Carbon Steel in MPa 248.4
Design Load Pmax in Newtons 7369.150841
Design Length in meters 2
Trial Section
Member L 40 X 40 X 6
Weight 3.52 kg/m
Area 448 mm2
Depth 40 mm
Base 40 mm
Thickness 6 mm
Ix, Iy 63 x 103 mm4
rx, ry 11.87 mm
Sx, Sy 2.26 x 103 mm3
Stiffness Factor, K 1
Modulus of Elasticity, E 200,000 MPa
Reference Formula Value
NSCP 2001, Section 505.2.2 Slenderness Ratio 168.4919966
Critical Slenderness
NSCP 2001, Section 505.3.1 126.0677706
Ratio, Cc
Therefore, CASE 1
Therefore, Fa 36.27643472 MPa
40
Case 1 CASE 2
If
Trial Section
Member L 40 X 40 X 6
Area 448 mm2
Actual Stress
8.224498706 MPa
Checking
fa 8.224498706 MPa
Fa 36.27643472 MPa
Therefore SAFE
41
DESIGN OF Vertical CHORD
DESIGN CONDITIONS
Fy A36 Carbon Steel in MPa 248.4
Design Load Pmax in Newtons 5055.195772
Design Length in meters 1.7
Trial Section
Member L 40 X 40 X 6
Weight 3.52 kg/m
Area 448 mm2
Depth 40 mm
Base 40 mm
Thickness 6 mm
Ix, Iy 63 x 103 mm4
rx, ry 11.87 mm
Sx, Sy 2.26 x 103 mm3
Stiffness Factor, K 1
Modulus of Elasticity, E 200,000 MPa
Reference Formula Value
NSCP 2001, Section 505.2.2 Slenderness Ratio 143.2181971
Critical Slenderness
NSCP 2001, Section 505.3.1 126.0677706
Ratio, Cc
Therefore, CASE 2
Therefore, Fa 50.20959823 MPa
42
Case 1 CASE 2
If
3
Trial Section
Member L 40 X 40 X 6
Area 448 mm2
Actual Stress
5.641959567 MPa
Checking
Fa 5.641959567 MPa
Fa 50.20959823 MPa
Therefore SAFE
43
DESIGN OF Bottom CHORD
DESIGN CONDITIONS
Fy A36 Carbon Steel in MPa 248.4
Design Load Pmax in Newtons 37975.8539
Design Length in meters 1
Trial Section
Member L 50 X 50 X 6
Weight 4.47 kg/m
Area 569 mm2
Depth 50 mm
Base 50 mm
Thickness 5 mm
Ix, Iy 128 x 103 mm4
rx, ry 15.02 mm
Sx, Sy 3.61 x 103 mm3
Stiffness Factor, K 1
Modulus of Elasticity, E 200,000 MPa
Reference Formula Value
NSCP 2001, Section 505.2.2 Slenderness Ratio 84.24599832
44
Case 1 CASE 2
If
3
Trial Section
Member L 50 X 50 X 6
Area 569 mm2
Actual Stress
33.37069763 MPa
Checking
Fa 33.37069763 MPa
Fa 102.6276126 MPa
Therefore SAFE
45
DESIGN OF COLUMNS
46
DESIGN OF COLUMN
Design Conditions
Column Height in m 5.5
Critical Vertical Reaction in kN
R Dead Load 8.35
R Live Load 31.85
R Wind Load 43.23360608
R Total 83.43360608
Critical Horizontal Reaction in kN
R Wind Load 19.95397204
R Total 19.95397204
Stiffness Factor, k 0.7
Cb 1.00
Design Conditions
Fy A36 Carbon Steel in MPa 248.4
Design Load Pmax in Newtons 83.43360608
Design Length in meters 5.5
Design Moment in kNm 109.7468462
Design Requirements
For Required Area
Reference Formula Value
NSCP 2001, Fa = 0.60Fy 149.04
Section 504.2.1 Required Area 559.8068041
For min
NSCP 2001 Section 502.8.1 rmin = kl/200 19.25
47
Trial Section
Member W 10 x 49
Depth 253.49 mm
Base 254 mm
Thickness, w 8.64 mm
48
For Allowable Axial Stress
Reference Formula Value
NSCP 2001, Slenderness 75.94544327
Section 505.2.2 Ratio
NSCP 2001, Critical Slenderness 126.0677706
Section 505.3.1 Ratio, Cc
Use Case 1
therefore, Fa 109.0081427 MPa
Case 1 Case 2
If
If
r
Checking
fa 8.981012495 MPa
Fa 109.0081427 MPa
Therefore SAFE
49
For Allowable Axial Stress
Lb 5500 mm
Lc 3223.204914 mm
Lu 7910.157963 mm
Case 1
Case 2
Lc<Lb<Lu Reference
Case 3
M
Fa =
Sx
50
Checking
fb 122.6221745 MPa
Fb 149.04 MPa
Therefore OKAY!
Therefore, adopt W 10 X 49
51
DESIGN OF WELDS
52
Design of Welds for Top Chord
Member Details
Member L40 x 40 x 6
Base 40.00 mm
Length 40.00 mm
Thickness 6.00 mm
Area 448.00 mm2
Centroid, x 12.02 mm
Centroid, y 12.02 mm
Design Condition
Design Load 39 kN
Electrode 40 276.00 MPa
P-1 13640.25 kN
P-2 5859.75 kN
L-1 38.83482292 mm
L-2 16.68315123 mm
L-1 65 mm
Therefore use,
L-2 65 mm
53
Design of Welds for Diagonal
Chord
Member Details
Member L40 x 40 x 6
Base 40.00 mm
Length 40.00 mm
Thickness 6.00 mm
Area 448.00 mm2
Centroid, x 12.02 mm
Centroid, y 12.02 mm
Design Condition
Design Load 7.4 kN
Electrode 40 276.00 MPa
P-1 2.58815 kN
P-2 1.11185 kN
L-1 7.368658709 mm
L-2 3.165521003 mm
L-1 65 mm
Therefore use,
L-2 65 mm
54
Design of Welds for Diagonal
Chord
Member Details
Member L40 x 40 x 6
Base 40.00 mm
Length 40.00 mm
Thickness 6.00 mm
Area 448.00 mm2
Centroid, x 12.02 mm
Centroid, y 12.02 mm
Design Condition
Design Load 5.1 kN
Electrode 40 276.00 MPa
P-1 1.783725 kN
P-2 0.766275
L-1 5.078399921 mm
L-2 2.181642854 mm
L-1 65 mm
Therefore use,
L-2 65 mm
55
Design of Welds for Bottom
Chord
Member Details
Member L50 x 50 x 6
Base 50.00 mm
Length 50.00 mm
Thickness 6.00 mm
Area 569.00 mm2
Centroid, x 14.45 mm
Centroid, y 14.45 mm
Design Condition
Design Load 38 kN
Electrode 40 276.00 MPa
Weld Load 19 kN
P-1 13.509 kN
P-2 5.491kN
L-1 38.46114425 mm
L-2 15.63329211 mm
L-1 65 mm
Therefore use,
L-2 65 mm
56
SUMMARY OF DESIGNS
57
SUMMARY
58